August 13th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 18 Comments
We must plan for freedom, and not only for security, if for no other reason than only freedom can make security more secure.
Karl Popper
| N |
North |
| Both |
♠ 10 7 5 4
♥ A K
♦ K 8
♣ Q J 9 7 6 |
| West |
East |
♠ J 3
♥ 10 8 5 4
♦ J 4 3 2
♣ K 8 3 |
♠ A Q 9 8 2
♥ 9 7 6
♦ Q 9 6 5
♣ 4 |
| South |
♠ K 6
♥ Q J 3 2
♦ A 10 7
♣ A 10 5 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♣ |
1 ♠ |
| 2 ♠ |
Pass |
3 ♣ |
Pass |
| 3 NT |
All pass |
|
|
♠J
Your partner rates to have four spades and four hearts, perhaps with a 4=4=2=3 pattern. So I can see the logic in leading a heart to try to set up tricks there. If you need to set up a slow spade winner, there may still be time, but this might be your last chance to lead hearts through declarer.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 9 8 4
♥ 8 5 4
♦ Q 7 3 2
♣ J 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♦ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
Pass |
2 ♣ |
| Pass |
Pass |
2 ♠ |
Pass |
| Pass |
3 ♣ |
All pass |
|
August 12th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 9 Comments
|
What are your favorite cities for the national and regional tournaments in the U.S.? I have decided to try to play seriously, but am not sure where to get my feet wet.
Pizza Man, Bristol, Va.
You just missed out on Philadelphia, a great venue and a city my wife loves. Hawaii this fall is an atypical venue, but a great locale nonetheless. Seattle and Vancouver for West Coast fans are certainly worth considering. And New Orleans (if not in midsummer) has much to recommend it because of the food and music.
I always have assumed that when a card becomes visible to the whole table, you have to play it. Is that right for both declarer and defenders?
Penang Lawyer, Corpus Christi, Texas
The defenders are held to higher standards than declarer because their partner may receive unauthorized information from a half-played card. If your partner could see the card, it must be played. Declarer’s card will be deemed played when declarer deliberately plays a card that either touches or nearly touches the table. There may be some ambiguity if a card is detached but the play of the card is not complete.
Can you give me a general approach to responding to a strong no-trump with an 8-count and zero, one or two majors? Should you invite game — and does it matter whether you use Stayman or raise to two no-trump?
High Heels, Torrance, Calif.
I try to avoid using Stayman to invite game without a major. It gives so much information to the hand on lead that I tend to pass with 8 and drive to game with a decent 9-count. With both majors, using Stayman has three upsides: finding a fit in either suit or reaching game facing a maximum. With only one major, especially at pairs, I tend to pass unless short in clubs. In that case, I could pass and play diamonds or the 4-3 fit in the other major.
|
What is your view on opening two diamonds, holding: ♠ 10-8, ♥ Q-7-4-2, ♦ A-J-9-5-3-2, ♣ 4? Does your opinion change depending on whether you are in first, second or third seat, and does the vulnerability matter?
Silent Speaker, Twin Falls, Idaho
My arbitrary cut-off point for opening a weak two with a side four-card major is Q-10-3-2. I would not want to lose a fit with a side suit that good, but if I did conceal the major, my minor suit would have to be a good one. That means either two top honors or one honor with great intermediates. This applies in any seat or at any vulnerability, but the expected high-card point count in second seat, or vulnerable, is slightly higher.
I’m confused by responsive doubles, when the opponents have bid and raised a suit around a double from my partner. What does the call say about bid and unbid majors? I’m especially flummoxed by what happens when the opponents bid and raise spades.
Muddling Through, Lakeland, Fla.
After a minor is bid and raised, you play natural methods, and that includes two no-trump. After hearts are bid and raised, double typically shows both majors, all calls including two no-trump are natural. After spades are bid and raised, bid hearts if you have them, using a direct call of three hearts as a mild invitation, and double for the minors (or a purely competitive hand with hearts). You can, if you want, consider using two no-trump as artificial when the majors are bid and raised. This would be an extension of the Lebensohl concept. I’ll go into that next month.
|
August 11th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 5 Comments
There will always be a part, and always a very large part of every community, that have no care but for themselves, and whose care for themselves reaches little further than impatience of immediate pain, and eagerness for the nearest good.
Samuel Johnson
| N |
North |
| None |
♠ K J 7 4 3
♥ 5 3
♦ A J 10 4
♣ J 10 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q 9 8 6
♥ Q 6 4
♦ K 9 7 2
♣ 6 2 |
♠ A 10 5 2
♥ J 9
♦ Q 6
♣ K Q 9 8 7 |
| South |
♠ —
♥ A K 10 8 7 2
♦ 8 5 3
♣ A 5 4 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♠ |
Pass |
| 2 ♥ |
Pass |
2 ♠ |
Pass |
| 4 ♥ |
All pass |
|
|
♦7
Just because East has shown spades doesn’t mean you cannot develop your hand straightforwardly by bidding your spade suit. Your partner knows you are a passed hand, so he won’t be playing you for a spectacular suit if you bid one spade. But this way, you get to show your values and suit lengths.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K J 7 4 3
♥ 5 3
♦ A J 10 4
♣ J 10 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| Pass |
1 ♣ |
1 ♥ |
Dbl. |
| ? |
|
|
|
August 10th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
The real hero is always a hero by mistake; he dreams of being an honest coward like everybody else. If it had been possible, he would have settled the matter otherwise, and without bloodshed.
Umberto Eco
| S |
North |
| Both |
♠ A K 7
♥ 9 8 5 3
♦ 10 6
♣ K 9 3 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ —
♥ J 10 6
♦ A 9 8 5 2
♣ Q J 10 5 4 |
♠ J 8 6 5 2
♥ A K 7 2
♦ J 7 3
♣ 8 |
| South |
♠ Q 10 9 4 3
♥ Q 4
♦ K Q 4
♣ A 7 6 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
1 NT * |
Pass |
| 2 ♣ |
Pass |
3 ♠ |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
*Forcing
♣Q
I am normally an aggressive overcaller, especially when bidding spades over a minor. Here, though, when facing a passed hand with a weak suit and a hand so playable in suits other than spades, I would tend to pass first and plan to back in if the opponents limit themselves or find a fit. Give me a top honor in spades instead of hearts, and I would feel differently.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ J 8 6 5 2
♥ A K 7 2
♦ J 7 3
♣ 8 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
Pass |
1 ♣ |
| ? |
|
|
|
August 9th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
The notion that one can discover large patterns or regularities in the procession of historical events is naturally attractive to those who are impressed by the success of the natural sciences in classifying, correlating and, above all, predicting.
Isaiah Berlin
| S |
North |
| E-W |
♠ A K Q 6
♥ Q J 3
♦ 9 7 5 2
♣ 6 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ 9 8
♥ 7 5 4 2
♦ A Q 4
♣ Q 5 3 2 |
♠ J 7 5 3
♥ K 10 9 8
♦ J 6
♣ J 10 9 |
| South |
♠ 10 4 2
♥ A 6
♦ K 10 8 3
♣ A K 8 7 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♦ |
Pass |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
2 NT |
Pass |
| 3 NT |
All pass |
|
|
♣2
You have the right shape for a takeout double, promising both majors. All that is standing between you and action is the absence of high cards, but should that matter? I don’t think so. You would have gladly responded to one club, so you should equally gladly double here and get your partner into the action. You’d rather have a better hand, but if wishes were horses…
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ J 7 5 3
♥ K 10 9 8
♦ J 6
♣ J 10 9 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♣ |
1 ♦ |
| ? |
|
|
|
August 8th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 13 Comments
Those who invoke history will certainly be heard by history. And they will have to accept its verdict.
Dag Hammarskjold (on Nikita Khruschev)
| S |
North |
| None |
♠ A 8 4 2
♥ A 7 5
♦ A 10 8 4
♣ 5 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q 10 5
♥ K J 9 4 2
♦ 6
♣ Q 10 9 2 |
♠ 3
♥ 10 3
♦ Q J 7 5 3
♣ K J 7 6 4 |
| South |
♠ K J 9 7 6
♥ Q 8 6
♦ K 9 2
♣ A 8 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
2 NT * |
Pass |
| 4 ♠ |
All pass |
|
|
*Forcing spade raise
♦6
The double of a four-heart opening (or any auction where the opponents bid hearts and raise to four hearts) is primarily for take-out. It is less clear how to play a similar sequence where the opponents get to four spades — I personally believe that is takeout-optional. But here you should have no problem bidding four no-trump to get partner to choose between the minors.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 3
♥ 10 3
♦ Q J 7 5 3
♣ K J 7 6 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
4 ♥ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
August 7th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 1 Comment
Wit is the salt of conversation, not the food.
William Hazlitt
| S |
North |
| Both |
♠ Q 8
♥ 5 4 2
♦ K 8 6 5
♣ A 9 8 6 |
| West |
East |
♠ K 6 3 2
♥ K Q
♦ Q J 10 3 2
♣ J 2 |
♠ J 9 5
♥ A 10 9 7 6
♦ 9 7 4
♣ K 7 |
| South |
♠ A 10 7 4
♥ J 8 3
♦ A
♣ Q 10 5 4 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♣ |
1 ♦ |
1 NT |
2 ♦ |
| Pass |
Pass |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| 2 ♠ |
Pass |
3 ♣ |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♥K
You have enough to force to game here, but no clear direction to go in. The simplest way to force to game is to start with a cue-bid of three diamonds. If partner bids three hearts, you can bid three spades and let partner decide where to go from there.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A 10 7 4
♥ J 8 3
♦ A
♣ Q 10 5 4 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
2 ♦ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
August 6th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 17 Comments
When you pay too much, you lose a little money — that is all. When you pay too little, you sometimes lose everything, because the thing you bought was incapable of doing the thing it was bought to do.
John Ruskin
| W |
North |
| None |
♠ 9 3 2
♥ Q 10 9 7 5
♦ A 3 2
♣ J 6 |
| West |
East |
♠ K 10 5
♥ K 6 4
♦ 6 5
♣ K 10 8 7 5 |
♠ A Q 7
♥ J 3
♦ Q 9 8 7
♣ Q 9 3 2 |
| South |
♠ J 8 6 4
♥ A 8 2
♦ K J 10 4
♣ A 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
Pass |
Pass |
| 1 ♦ |
Pass |
1 ♥ |
Pass |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
Pass |
1 NT |
| Pass |
Pass |
2 ♦ |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♣7
Clearly a club lead looks unattractive; the choice is to lead your suit, diamonds, or to try to open up one major or the other in the attempt to find partner’s suit, or at least to avoid giving up a trick unnecessarily. Since both opponents appear to be relatively balanced, I want to try to set up tricks for partner by leading spades. My choice would be the eight.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ 8 6 2
♥ Q 8 2
♦ J 9 5 4
♣ K 8 6 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♣ |
Pass |
1 NT |
| Pass |
2 NT |
All pass |
|
August 5th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 15 Comments
|
I held ♠ Q-3, ♥ A-J-9, ♦ K-J-10-2, ♣ J-10-6-2, and opened one diamond. When my partner responded one spade, I rebid one no-trump, and now my partner bid two hearts, natural and non-forcing. What would you do now?
Settling Down, Muncie, Ind.
The choice is between giving preference to two spades and passing two hearts. I think your good hearts and weak spades argue for passing; after all, you might even be in a 5-3 fit, in which case you would certainly be pleased with your decision.
I’m about to start directing at my club, and I would welcome a little help. When a director is called to the table after a break in tempo, what is the standard procedure to follow?
Beri-Beri, Kenosha, Wis.
Ask the player who called you to the table to set out the facts. Then ask the other players to make sure you have the facts right. Decide whether a break in tempo took place (or at least was established to your satisfaction). Let the play proceed, and tell the players to call you back if they aren’t happy. If they do, and you determined that there was indeed a break, then you must decide whether it could demonstrably have suggested the action chosen by the partner of the hesitator. If it did, consider adjusting the score.
In second seat, I opened one no-trump with ♠ K-3, ♥ A-10-7-3-2, ♦ K-Q-3, ♣ A-10-4. I heard an overcall of two clubs on my left, showing clubs and a major. When that was passed around to me, I tried two hearts; was that too aggressive? Anyway, now my partner bid two spades. Should I bid or pass?
Lucy Locket, Galveston, Texas
The two-heart call was a little aggressive, but I suspect I would have done the same. Your partner’s decision to bid two spades might be based on a 4-1-4-4 pattern, but more likely he has five or more spades and fewer than 5 HCP, with at most a doubleton heart. So I would pass. The good news is that while you have only two spades, your cards in the side suits should work reasonably well.
|
How far should you compete with a fit when the opponents get in your face? I held ♠ A-10-9-7, ♥ K-5-3, ♦ A-J-4-3, ♣ J-9, and opened one diamond; my partner responded one spade. I was planning to raise to two, when the next hand preempted in hearts. Given that I have a minimum hand, it is easy to raise to two spades, but should I compete to three spades over a three-heart call?
Mumbles, Bellingham, Wash.
My general rule is that in competition you can be forced to give support one level higher than you wanted to go, but not two. So bid three spades over a three-heart pre-empt since, as these things go, your hand has decent controls. With the heart queen instead of the king, pass three hearts. With a real invitation to three spades, it follows that you must jump to four spades.
I need help understanding what sort of hand allows you to raise partner’s suit (be it an opening or overcall) and then double at your next turn. Is this penalty, cards or take-out?
Fruit-loops, Indianapolis, Ind.
If the opponents come in with an unsupported suit, then a double by either hand sounds like a defensive holding. Conversely, if the opponents have raised a suit, the double sounds like extras in high cards, typically with the minimum number of trumps for the action thus far.
|
August 4th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 8 Comments
I often say that when you can measure what you are speaking about and express it in numbers, you know something about it; but when you cannot … your knowledge is of a meagre and unsatisfactory kind.
William Thomson
| E |
North |
| N-S |
♠ J 8
♥ A K J 4
♦ A K Q
♣ Q 7 4 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q 10 5 3
♥ 9 7 3
♦ 10 9 8 7 6 4
♣ — |
♠ 9 7 4
♥ 10 2
♦ 3
♣ K J 10 9 8 6 3 |
| South |
♠ A K 6 2
♥ Q 8 6 5
♦ J 5 2
♣ A 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
3 ♣ |
| Dbl. |
Pass |
4 ♣ |
Pass |
| 4 ♥ |
Pass |
5 ♥ |
Pass |
| 6 ♥ |
All pass |
|
|
♦10
This sequence is best played as artificial. (With four spades, North would bid three or four no-trump; with five spades, he would have transferred.) The call should show slam interest with a heart fit. Your honor location and minimum values are not strong enough for a four-diamond cue-bid. But if you feel too good to sign off in four hearts now, you might use three no-trump as artificial here.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ J 8
♥ A K J 4
♦ A K Q
♣ Q 7 4 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 2 NT |
Pass |
3 ♣ |
Pass |
| 3 ♥ |
Pass |
3 ♠ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
|
In today’s deal, you appear to have nine tricks ready to run once clubs have been established. So what is the danger? Clearly, the defenders might be able to run the spades. If you win the spade king, then arrange to finesse in clubs, West may get in with the club king and lead a spade through dummy’s remaining 10-third of spades. Now East-West can cash out for down one.
So your target is to hold up or protect your spade stopper. You can accomplish this by the somewhat unnatural move of ducking the spade at trick one.
The defense will almost certainly clear spades. If East does not play a third and fourth round of the suit, you will have tricks to burn. But if he does, then after taking his spade trick, declarer should take the club finesse, confident that West will be out of spades when he gains the lead in clubs.
The holdup is correct because you know that it is only West (the safe hand) who can gain the lead in clubs. If the clubs honors were reversed, with the ace in dummy, winning the spade king at once would be correct, since East couldn’t play spades without setting up dummy’s 10. And if you are missing the club ace instead of the king, it is a blind guess as to whether to win or duck the first trick.
Strangely, if North declares three no-trump on a low spade lead, the winning play of ducking at trick one becomes even harder to find, doesn’t it?