May 30th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 10 Comments
No lesson seems to be so deeply inculcated by the experience of life as that you should never trust experts. If you believe doctors, nothing is wholesome; if you believe the theologians, nothing is innocent; if you believe the soldiers, nothing is safe.
Third Marquess of Salisbury
| S |
North |
| N-S |
♠ Q 9 8 5 2
♥ K 9
♦ J 5 4
♣ Q J 6 |
| West |
East |
♠ J 7 6
♥ 10 8 7 4
♦ 10 3
♣ 10 8 4 3 |
♠ K 4 3
♥ Q J 6
♦ Q 9 8 7 6
♣ 9 2 |
| South |
♠ A 10
♥ A 5 3 2
♦ A K 2
♣ A K 7 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 2 ♣ |
Pass |
2 ♦ |
Pass |
| 2 NT |
Pass |
3 ♥ |
Pass |
| 3 ♠ |
Pass |
5 NT |
Pass |
| 6 NT |
All pass |
|
|
♥8
This hand is worth a jump to three spades, which should be played as invitational, not forcing. Note: Many people play two no-trump as artificial here, an extension of Lebensohl. If you do that, the jump to three spades shows five, while going through two no-trump to three spades shows four.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 9 8 5 2
♥ K 9
♦ J 5 4
♣ Q J 6 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
2 ♥ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
May 29th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 3 Comments
Stealing, of course, is a crime. … But if you were very, very hungry, and you had no way of obtaining money, it would be excusable to grab (a) painting, take it to your house, and eat it.
Lemony Snicket
| S |
North |
| Both |
♠ J 5 3
♥ 9 8 3
♦ K Q 10 9 3
♣ Q 8 |
| West |
East |
♠ K Q 4
♥ Q 10 4 2
♦ A 2
♣ K 10 7 4 |
♠ 10 9 8 7
♥ J 7 6
♦ 7 6 5
♣ 6 5 2 |
| South |
♠ A 6 2
♥ A K 5
♦ J 8 4
♣ A J 9 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
♥4
Your partner has made a game try, and your hand is neither a clear acceptance nor rejection. A lot depends on whether your partner is short in hearts or in diamonds. Bid three diamonds to show this sort of diamond holding, and let your partner decide whether he wants to play game — and if so, which one.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ J 5 3
♥ 9 8 3
♦ K Q 10 9 3
♣ Q 8 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♠ |
2 ♥ |
| 2 ♠ |
Pass |
3 ♣ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
May 28th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
You need to try to do the impossible, to anticipate the unexpected. And when the unexpected happens, you should double the efforts to make order from the disorder it creates in your life.
A.S. Grove
| N |
North |
| Both |
♠ A 10 9 6 4 2
♥ —
♦ 10 9 7
♣ A 10 7 6 |
| West |
East |
♠ 3
♥ K Q 7 6 4
♦ K Q 8 5 4 3
♣ Q |
♠ K Q J 8 7 5
♥ A J 8 2
♦ J 6
♣ J |
| South |
♠ —
♥ 10 9 5 3
♦ A 2
♣ K 9 8 5 4 3 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
Pass |
1 ♠ |
| 3 ♣ |
3 ♥ |
5 ♣ |
5 ♥ |
| Pass |
Pass |
6 ♣ |
Dbl. |
| All pass |
|
|
|
♠3
The simple choice is between the red suits. With what looks like a natural trump trick, you don’t seem to need ruffs. My instinct is to lead the sequence and try to develop tricks in diamonds, since leading hearts may set up a slow winner for the opponents.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ Q J 8
♥ 5
♦ J 10 9 6 2
♣ J 9 5 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
1 ♥ |
Dbl. |
| Pass |
1 NT |
Pass |
4 ♠ |
| All pass |
|
|
|
May 27th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 2 Comments
|
What should be the range associated with a jump overcall of a pre-emptive opener, or a jump in the balancing seat? And what about the situation when you are in sandwich seat, and the opponents open and respond, either in a new suit or with a raise of opener’s suit?
Leapy Lee, Augusta, Maine
Play strong jumps over pre-empts, while if the opponents pass an opening round to you, a jump should be something like an opening bid plus a good six-card suit. If the opponents bid and raise a suit, a jump by you at the three-level can by agreement be played as strong, not weak. However, if the opponents respond in a new suit, I’d advocate still playing weak jump overcalls. Next month, I’ll expound on the subject of Leaping and Non-Leaping Michaels.
Please clarify the meaning of bidding a suit an opponent has bid. I take it to mean a cue-bid, showing strength and asking partner to bid. When should one make this bid rather than doubling? I would only consider it following an opening bid; should it ever be considered over a response or an overcall?
Burton Ernie, Dallas, Texas
Let’s assume that, as an overcaller over an opening, you play Michaels or whatever two-suiter you agree. As third hand, your cue-bid of RHO’s suit shows fit and high cards, whereas a jump shows shape, not HCP. As fourth hand, the cue-bid shows a raise of overcaller’s suit. Once opener and responder haven’t set a trump suit, a cue-bid by either player below three no-trump tends to be a probe for three no-trump until proven to be a slam try with implicit or explicit fit.
Just about everybody I play bridge with has a different opinion on how to respond to a possibly short opening bid of one club. Some partners invent a one-diamond response with a weak hand. How do you feel about that?
Cave Canem, Grenada, Miss.
Even if you regularly open one club with a doubleton, I don’t see any reason to alter the structure of natural responses and to bid with fewer than, say, 4 HCP. As before, major-suit bids show four or more cards, while one no-trump is 6-10. It is only if you chose to play the one no-trump call as showing 8-10, rather than 6-10, that you might opt to invent a one-diamond response from time to time.
|
I picked up ♠ Q-8-4-2, ♥ K-9-2, ♦ 10-7-4, ♣ Q-8-3, and heard my partner open one club. I bid one spade, and my partner then bid three spades. Was I wrong to pass, as opposed to raising to four spades? My partner had a singleton diamond, so game was good — but if he had had three diamonds and one heart, game would have been hopeless.
Just-So Stories, Durango, Colo.
This hand is on the cusp. Two of your three honors are surely working, but it is a 50-50 shot as to whether the heart king will play a part in the hand. I guess I would pass because of the lack of spade intermediates. Had partner opened one diamond instead of one club, I would pass three spades more happily.
We had a dispute in my regular partnership. I held ♠ Q-10, ♥ 10-8-4-2, ♦ K-5-3, ♣ J-9-8-3 and heard my LHO open one diamond; my RHO responded one spade. When my LHO rebid no-trump, this came back to my partner, who doubled. What should this show?
A La Mode, Honolulu, Hawaii
Your partner’s double can sensibly be played in two ways. The first is my choice: It is a penalty double of spades with at least an opening bid. The second is to play the double as limited and take-out, but your spade shortness argues against that. I suppose you could even play it as either one or the other, requiring you to work out from your spade length which it is. Here, I would pass and lead the spade queen.
|
May 26th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 11 Comments
They constantly try to escape From the darkness outside and within By dreaming of systems so perfect that no one will need to be good.
T.S. Eliot
| N |
North |
| N-S |
♠ 9 5
♥ 10 2
♦ K Q 6
♣ A K 10 9 4 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ K Q 3
♥ Q
♦ A J 9 8 7
♣ 7 6 5 3 |
♠ J 2
♥ K J 9 6 5 3
♦ 10 5 4
♣ Q 8 |
| South |
♠ A 10 8 7 6 4
♥ A 8 7 4
♦ 3 2
♣ J |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♣ |
2 ♥ |
| 2 ♠ |
Pass |
3 ♣ |
Pass |
| 3 ♠ |
Pass |
4 ♠ |
All pass |
♥Q
In a game-forcing auction, every partnership must agree whether a jump to four spades here is minimum or indicates fitting cards in spades and diamonds; both treatments are playable, of course. In either event, a jump to four hearts by you should be shortage. If it shows extras, the hand might not be worth the call, but my instincts are that you should make it even with a minimum hand here.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K Q 3
♥ Q
♦ A J 9 8 7
♣ 7 6 5 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♠ |
Pass |
| 2 ♦ |
Pass |
2 ♠ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
May 25th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 12 Comments
Does the end justify the means? That is possible. But what will justify the end? To that question, which historical thought leaves pending, rebellion replies: the means.
Albert Camus
| N |
North |
| Both |
♠ A K Q 9 8 7 4
♥ 5
♦ 5
♣ A J 9 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ J 10 5 3 2
♥ 8 3 2
♦ 9 6 4
♣ K 4 |
♠ 6
♥ Q J 9 7 6
♦ A 10
♣ Q 8 7 6 3 |
| South |
♠ —
♥ A K 10 4
♦ K Q J 8 7 3 2
♣ 10 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♠ |
Pass |
| 2 ♦ |
Pass |
3 ♠ |
Pass |
| 4 ♥ |
Pass |
5 ♣ |
Pass |
| 6 ♦ |
All pass |
|
|
♣K
While your hand might not be worth a call of two hearts, you expect the opponents to bounce to at least the three-level in spades, and you therefore need to get your hand off your chest at your first turn. Bid hearts, then raise clubs, which will at least get the basic nature of your hand across to your partner at the cost of a mild overbid.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 6
♥ Q J 9 7 6
♦ A 10
♣ Q 8 7 6 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♣ |
1 ♠ |
| ? |
|
|
|
May 24th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
I’m a games player by nature. Don’t get me wrong. Nothing that involves movement. Like leaving my chair.
Maureen Lipman
| S |
North |
| Both |
♠ A 8 6 4 2
♥ K 5
♦ 8 5 4
♣ A 7 5 |
| West |
East |
♠ K J 9 3
♥ 2
♦ A 10 7 2
♣ J 9 3 2 |
♠ Q 10 7
♥ J 9 8 6
♦ 9 6 3
♣ 10 6 4 |
| South |
♠ 5
♥ A Q 10 7 4 3
♦ K Q J
♣ K Q 8 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♥ |
Pass |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
| 3 ♥ |
Pass |
4 ♣ |
Pass |
| 4 NT |
Pass |
5 ♦* |
Pass |
| 6 ♥ |
All pass |
|
|
*Three keycards
♦A
This is a problem with no sensible answer. If you bid two diamonds, you will force the hand to game without any real confidence in a fit or source of tricks. You could raise either clubs or hearts to the three-level to invite game, which somewhat overstates your trump support in either case, or you could go very low by bidding only two hearts. If you twisted my arm, I would bid three hearts, but don’t expect me to like it.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A 8 6 4 2
♥ K 5
♦ 8 5 4
♣ A 7 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♥ |
Pass |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
2 ♣ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
May 23rd, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 24 Comments
Self-sacrifice is a thing that should be put down by law. It is so demoralizing to the people for whom one sacrifices oneself. They always go to the bad.
Oscar Wilde
| S |
North |
| N-S |
♠ 7 6 3 2
♥ 7 6 2
♦ A K 5 4
♣ 8 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ K Q J 9 4
♥ Q J 9 8 4
♦ 9 7 2
♣ — |
♠ 8 5
♥ 5
♦ Q J 10 8 6 3
♣ 10 9 5 3 |
| South |
♠ A 10
♥ A K 10 3
♦ —
♣ A K Q J 7 6 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♣ |
2 ♣* |
Pass |
2 ♦ |
| 2 ♥ |
3 ♦ |
3 NT |
4 ♦ |
| 5 ♣ |
All pass |
|
|
*Majors
♠K
The simplest path is to raise to two spades, since you have bad trumps and good defense. You might compete to three spades later, depending on how the auction works out. An immediate jump to three spades would be a pre-emptive raise, and this hand is too strong for that. A fit jump to three diamonds, showing a spade fit and a diamond suit you want partner to lead, would be possible if you had a fifth diamond.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 7 6 3 2
♥ 7 6 2
♦ A K 5 4
♣ 8 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| Pass |
1 ♣ |
1 ♠ |
Dbl. |
| ? |
|
|
|
May 22nd, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 13 Comments
Clever men will recognize and tolerate nothing but cleverness; every authority rouses their ridicule, every superstition amuses them, every convention moves them to contradiction.
Henri-Frederic Amiel
| N |
North |
| Both |
♠ A 9 6
♥ A 10 7 2
♦ A K
♣ 10 9 8 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q 8 7 4 3
♥ K J 8
♦ 10 8
♣ K J 7 |
♠ K 5 2
♥ 6 4 3
♦ 7 6 4 3 2
♣ 5 2 |
| South |
♠ J 10
♥ Q 9 5
♦ Q J 9 5
♣ A Q 6 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♣ |
Pass |
| 2 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
♠4
This auction is maybe more about partnership agreement than it is about judgment. I play that when the opponents respond in a new suit after my partner has doubled, a double by me is penalty, not responsive, and a call of two spades says “That is what I would have bid without intervention.” Either of those actions is possible, but the simple two-spade call has a lot to recommend it.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 8 7 4 3
♥ K J 8
♦ 10 8
♣ K J 7 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♦ |
Dbl. |
1 ♠ |
| ? |
|
|
|
May 21st, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 3 Comments
The better part of valor is discretion, in the which better part I have saved my life.
Falstaff
| S |
North |
| None |
♠ Q 4
♥ J 8 7 4 3
♦ A 7 5
♣ A 10 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ K 8 6 3
♥ K 6
♦ 10 9 6
♣ 9 7 6 2 |
♠ 10 9 7 5 2
♥ Q
♦ J 8 4 3
♣ K Q 8 |
| South |
♠ A J
♥ A 10 9 5 2
♦ K Q 2
♣ J 5 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♥ |
Pass |
3 ♥ |
Pass |
| 4 ♥ |
All pass |
|
|
♦10
Even though the opponents’ auction here would tend to get you to look at majors rather than minors, jack-fourth is hardly the most attractive of options. So I would lead from my five-card suit as being a far more promising line of attack than a four-card suit.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ J 8 4 2
♥ 10 8
♦ Q 7 4 3 2
♣ A 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
1 NT |
| Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
|
|
The Cavendish Invitational brings together the world’s best pairs and teams for a week of competition with some of the largest cash prizes in bridge. It is currently held in Monaco, but for many years it was organized in Las Vegas. One of the favorites in those years was the partnership of Brad Moss and Fred Gitelman, who had considerable success both as a partnership and individually. Gitelman combines a talent for playing the game with a real acumen for marketing the game through computers and the internet.
Gitelman is the developer of Bridge Master, educational software that features many useful elements of technique to improve the game of everyone from beginners to experts. It was therefore especially piquant that today’s deal cropped up as a problem for Gitelman in the 2001 Cavendish Pairs.
Of all the little-known percentage plays, one of the most obscure is featured in the spade suit on this deal. There might be something to be said for playing six clubs here, but six no-trump looks like the more normal spot. How should you play the key suit of spades to maximize your chances for four tricks?
The answer is to run the spade queen! If the suit is 3-3, you have a blind guess; if the suit is 4-2, you can pick up three of the four honor-doubletons by leading the queen. No other play achieves that result. It is only fitting that when Gitelman was faced with the challenge in six no-trump, he duly made the right play and was rewarded when the cards cooperated.