May 20th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
|
Do you have any plans for a follow-up to “The Lone Wolff”? Would you ever do a book consisting of bridge hands as opposed to an autobiography?
Bookworm, Duluth, Minn.
My book is far more about my life and times than it is about bridge hands. Almost every deal in the book (of which there are very few) is there to advance the story or to make a point. Yes, if asked, I would consider trying to put together hands from the columns for a book. But nobody has been beating down my door with lucrative offers recently.
In a recent column, you have a player with 12 points and 4-4 in the minors opening the bidding with one club. However, in a bidding problem, you suggest opening one diamond. Which is your recommended strategy?
Desperate Dan, Virginia City, Nev.
Much inappropriate and misdirected thought has been wasted on this question; I’m sorry if I innocently added to the confusion. There is no technically superior answer to the question of which suit to bid, but there is a practical answer: I’d recommend always opening the better suit. The reason is that if the opponents end up declaring the hand, you’d rather your partner led your good suit, not your bad one. This also applies when a hand is too strong to open one no-trump.
Have you ever played a forcing pass method or a system that didn’t conform to a standard base? If so, did you enjoy the process?
Lumpfish, Trenton, N.J.
We were all young once, but ever since I grew up, I have tended to follow normal methods. However, that does remind me that 40 years ago it took a lot of persuading to convince one of the top American women that if her opponents played an opening pass as a strong hand, she could not double the pass to show a good hand herself!
|
At my local club, I picked up ♠ A-Q-3, ♥ 10-5-3-2, ♦ A-Q-7-4, ♣ Q-3 and responded with a two-no-trump call to my partner’s opening bid of one heart, to show a forcing raise. When my partner bid three hearts, showing extras but no shortage, what should I have done?
Half Mast, Harrisburg, Pa.
In context, you have nothing to spare. You have bad trumps and at most a queen more than a dead minimum, so I would sign off now. If all your partner needs is two aces, he can use Blackwood to find out more. For the record, if your hearts were J-10-x-x, you might bid three no-trump, meaning it as having nothing to spare, and not being unsuitable for slam but without extras.
What scheme of responses to weak twos do you recommend? Does it depend on the degree of discipline your partnership imposes on pre-empts? If you ask for features, what holding outside the trump suit is needed for the weak-two opener to treat his hand as maximum?
Forward Progress, Portland, Ore.
Briefly, if playing Ogust (which assumes a pre-empt may be on only a moderate suit — or worse), what constitutes a good suit and a good hand may still depend a little on the vulnerability. A good suit should have decent play for one loser facing a doubleton (a minimum of six to the king-queen). The range is 6-10, no matter what style of responses you play; and if you have a maximum, show a feature with an ace, king or guarded queen.
|
May 19th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 8 Comments
As man under pressure tends to give in to physical and intellectual weakness, only great strength of will can lead to the objective.
Carl von Clausewitz
| W |
North |
| None |
♠ K 2
♥ K 10 9 7 6 4
♦ J 4 2
♣ 9 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q 9 7 4
♥ 8
♦ A 9 7 3
♣ K Q 6 3 |
♠ J 8 5
♥ J 5 3
♦ K 10 6
♣ 10 8 7 5 |
| South |
♠ A 10 6 3
♥ A Q 2
♦ Q 8 5
♣ A J 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
Pass |
Pass |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
2 ♦ |
Pass |
| 2 ♥ |
Dbl. |
3 ♥ |
Pass |
| 4 ♥ |
All pass |
|
|
♣K
Are you a man or a mouse? Most experts would re-open with a double with barely a second thought. If West has been lurking with a powerhouse, you might regret it. But say your partner has five spades to the king and three little hearts. Then no matter what the rest of his hand is, either four spades should come close or the opponents can make game — and sometimes both games will make.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 9 7 4
♥ 8
♦ A 9 7 3
♣ K J 6 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
Pass |
| Pass |
4 ♥ |
Pass |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
May 18th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 5 Comments
Sole survivor, cursed with second sight Haunted savior, cried into the night.
Eric Bloom
| E |
North |
| None |
♠ A 7
♥ Q 9 2
♦ K 5 4
♣ A Q 10 9 5 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q 9 8 6 3 2
♥ 10 8 6 4
♦ A 10 7
♣ — |
♠ 10 5 4
♥ A 3
♦ Q 8 6
♣ J 7 6 4 3 |
| South |
♠ K J
♥ K J 7 5
♦ J 9 3 2
♣ K 8 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
Pass |
| 1 ♦ |
2 ♠ |
3 ♣ |
Pass |
| 3 NT |
All pass |
|
|
♠6
You showed 15-17 at your first turn. Then completing the transfer showed three trumps. In context, you have a minimum, plus soft cards in the opponents’ suit. You have absolutely no reason to think of bidding now. Partner is in control of the auction, and he wants to sell out. Respect his authority.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A 7
♥ Q 9 2
♦ K 5 4
♣ A Q 10 9 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
2 ♦ |
Dbl. |
| 2 ♥ |
3 ♦ |
Pass |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
May 17th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 19 Comments
The fixation on school has become a class trait. It manifests itself as a mixture of incurious piety and parlor game.
V.S. Pritchett
| S |
North |
| None |
♠ 9 8 3
♥ A K J 7
♦ K 8 6 4
♣ A 5 |
| West |
East |
♠ A 10 7 4 2
♥ 9
♦ J 9 2
♣ J 8 4 3 |
♠ K 5
♥ Q 10 4 3 2
♦ Q 5
♣ 10 7 6 2 |
| South |
♠ Q J 6
♥ 8 6 5
♦ A 10 7 3
♣ K Q 9 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♦ |
Pass |
1 ♥ |
Pass |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♠4
This sort of deal demonstrates why it is a good idea for the opener to be allowed to break the transfer whenever he has four trumps and anything but a dead minimum, and also perhaps when he has three good trumps and a maximum. The point is that when opener doesn’t break the transfer, you can pass two hearts and not risk going overboard, since game is unlikely to be good.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K 5
♥ Q 10 4 3 2
♦ Q 5
♣ 10 7 6 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 NT |
Pass |
| 2 ♦ |
Pass |
2 ♥ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
May 16th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 3 Comments
Brazil? He twirled a button Without a glance my way: But, madam, is there nothing else That we can show today?
Emily Dickinson
| E |
North |
| E-W |
♠ Q 9 2
♥ 6 5 4
♦ A Q 3
♣ K 8 4 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ 10 6
♥ 10 9 8 2
♦ 5 4
♣ 10 9 7 5 2 |
♠ K J 7
♥ A K Q J
♦ 10 9 7 6
♣ Q J |
| South |
♠ A 8 5 4 3
♥ 7 3
♦ K J 8 2
♣ A 6 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
1 NT |
| 2 ♠* |
Pass |
2 NT |
Pass |
| 3 ♦ |
Pass |
3 ♠ |
Pass |
| 4 ♠ |
All pass |
|
|
*Spades and a minor
♥10
This hand comes down to the Law of Total Tricks. When you cue-bid two hearts, you showed a limit raise with at least three trumps. (Some pairs might have a way to show a limit raise with four trumps, but we do not.) You should assume your partner does not have enough to bid to three spades, and your balanced hand argues for defending, as you have only three trumps. So pass three hearts.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 9 2
♥ 6 5 4
♦ A Q 3
♣ K 8 4 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♥ |
1 ♠ |
Dbl. |
| 2 ♥ |
3 ♥ |
Pass |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
May 15th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 8 Comments
Art is not a mirror to hold up to society, but a hammer with which to shape it.
Bertolt Brecht
| S |
North |
| None |
♠ 9 7 4 3
♥ 10 5
♦ A J 9 5
♣ A J 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ K 5
♥ J 9 6 4 2
♦ K 10 2
♣ 9 5 4 |
♠ 10 8 6 2
♥ K Q 3
♦ 7 6 4
♣ 8 6 2 |
| South |
♠ A Q J
♥ A 8 7
♦ Q 8 3
♣ K Q 10 7 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♣ |
Pass |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
| 2 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♥4
Had East not bid one heart, you would probably have bid two spades. As it is, should you bid two spades anyway, or is one spade enough? I think it is right to bid two spades, since you would compete to one spade on the same hand without one of the aces — that call really doesn’t show anything more than fourplus spades, though it denies weakness.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 9 7 4 3
♥ 10 5
♦ A J 9 5
♣ A J 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♣ |
Dbl. |
1 ♥ |
| ? |
|
|
|
May 14th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 10 Comments
Work without hope draws nectar in a sieve, And hope without an object cannot live.
Samuel Taylor Coleridge
| N |
North |
| N-S |
♠ 8 4
♥ A Q J
♦ A Q 9 8 3
♣ J 7 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q 10 6 5 2
♥ 8 7 3
♦ 7 2
♣ K 9 5 |
♠ K 9 3
♥ 9 6 5 4
♦ K 4
♣ 10 8 6 2 |
| South |
♠ A J 7
♥ K 10 2
♦ J 10 6 5
♣ A Q 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♦ |
Pass |
| 2 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♠Q
If you lead a top spade, you need partner to have the suit run on defense — the chance that partner will have a high-card entry is quite small. If you lead a small diamond, you have a decent chance of establishing the suit, since you do have the side entries. With fewer high cards on the side, the spade lead becomes more attractive.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ A K 5
♥ Q 8 6
♦ Q 7 5 3 2
♣ 9 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
Pass |
1 NT |
| Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
|
May 13th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 13 Comments
|
My partner tells me that it is consistent with Standard American to use the short club or short diamond opening bid in hopes of finding a fit in a major suit. What should the minimum holding be to make such a bid? And what should my minimum support (and high cards) be to respond, assuming no intervening bid?
Get Shorty, Ketchikan, Alaska
Playing standard, with 3-3 in the minors, I always open one club, regardless of suit quality, unless in third seat with really good diamonds. With 4-4, I open the better minor, more for the lead than for any other reason. As responder, assume partner always has four diamonds and rates to have four clubs for the opening bid. Assume that you can raise with four trumps (whether or not you are in a competitive auction) if nothing else seems appropriate.
I have a lot of trouble understanding and remembering the rule of 11; could you explain it to me — in words of one syllable?
Gobstopper, Danville, Ill.
When your partner leads a fourth-highest card, count up how many higher cards in that suit are unaccounted for. (For example, on the lead of a five, the six through ace represent the nine missing cards.) Since your partner’s hand holds three of them (she led her fourth-highest, so she has three bigger), the remaining (9 – 3 = 6) six higher cards are held by you, dummy and declarer. Subtract dummy’s and your own to know how many declarer has. A shortcut is to subtract the card led from 11: 11 minus five equals six.
Holding ♠ 6, ♥ J-9-7-2, ♦ 10-8, ♣ K-Q-10-7-5-4, when would you open three clubs, and when would the vulnerability or scoring persuade you to stay silent? Would you ever make a jump overcall here?
Lumpfish, San Juan, P.R.
I might open three clubs non-vulnerable in first chair, despite the weak four-card major on the side. Beef up that major to include a top honor, and I’d leave well enough alone and pass. In third seat, opening three clubs looks reasonable at any vulnerability, as does a jump overcall; mixing up your partnership pre-empting style is a perfectly reasonable policy. Many do it and don’t admit it.
|
I was on opening lead against a confidently bid slam, holding ♠ 6, ♥ Q-10-8-4, ♦ K-5-4-3, ♣ J-9-7-2. My RHO had opened and rebid spades; my LHO had bid diamonds then used key-card and driven to six spades after a response showing two key-cards and no trump queen. What are your thoughts on how I should approach the problem?
Catch-22, Woodland Hills, Calif.
There are two schools of thought: Try to set up a heart or club winner and hope partner has a sure winner somewhere so you can cash it. Or lead a diamond in an attempt to set up that suit or put declarer off the finesse (maybe before he knows spades aren’t breaking). For me, it comes down to a red suit, and I slightly favor a heart over a diamond.
When should opener rebid a five-card suit after a one-level response, as opposed to bidding one no-trump? What about over a two-level response?
Bucket List, Miami, Fla.
In my book, the answer to the second question is: Whenever no other attractive option presents itself. Unless the suit is headed by two top honors, I generally will strive not to do it, though. After a one-level response you’d prefer not to rebid a five-card suit but to raise partner with three trumps or rebid one no-trump if possible. But often a shape like 2-4-5-2 or 2-4-2-5 presents problems after you open your minor and hear a one-spade response, I admit.
|
May 12th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 17 Comments
It is really quite impossible to say anything with absolute precision, unless that thing is so abstracted from the real world as to not represent any real thing.
Richard Feynman
| S |
North |
| N-S |
♠ A 7
♥ K J 6
♦ A 9 8 2
♣ A K 9 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ K 9
♥ 4 2
♦ K J 7 4
♣ Q J 8 5 2 |
♠ Q J 6 4 3
♥ 9 7
♦ Q 10 5 3
♣ 10 6 |
| South |
♠ 10 8 5 2
♥ A Q 10 8 5 3
♦ 6
♣ 7 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 2 ♥ |
Pass |
6 ♥ |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♥2
I have never been a big fan of upgrading a 19-count into a two-no-trump opening bid. This hand feels rather suit-oriented, so opening one club, planning a two-no-trump rebid, seems like the normal action. Sometimes the opponents will help us steer clear of three no-trump when it is right to do so.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A 7
♥ K J 6
♦ A 9 8 2
♣ A K 9 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
Pass |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
May 11th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 9 Comments
A schoolboy’s tale, the wonder of an hour!
Lord Byron
| S |
North |
| E-W |
♠ J 10 9
♥ A K 7 4 2
♦ 8 6
♣ 9 7 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q 8 7
♥ J 6
♦ J 10 3 2
♣ Q J 10 2 |
♠ 4
♥ Q 10 8 3
♦ Q 9 7 5 4
♣ 8 5 3 |
| South |
♠ A K 6 5 3 2
♥ 9 5
♦ A K
♣ A K 6 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 2 ♣ |
Pass |
2 ♥ |
Pass |
| 2 ♠ |
Pass |
3 ♠ |
Pass |
| 4 NT |
Pass |
5 ♦ |
Pass |
| 5 ♥* |
Pass |
5 ♠ |
Pass |
| 6 ♠ |
All pass |
|
|
*Asking for the spade queen
♣Q
Your partner rates to be relatively short in both majors, so I can see some logic in raising to two clubs as opposed to rebidding one no-trump. Nonetheless, I think the one no-trump call suggests your values nicely, and lets partner rebid two clubs if appropriate. He surely won’t have six clubs, will he?
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ J 10 9
♥ A K 7 4 2
♦ 8 6
♣ 9 7 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
1 ♣ |
Dbl. |
| 1 ♥ |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
|
In today’s deal, you reach a delicate four-heart game after West has suggested a three-suiter and a maximum for his original pass. You duck the lead of the club king, and West accurately shifts to a trump.
It may be hard to see how to avoid the loss of three diamond tricks, since the top honors appear to be split, but you can exert a fair amount of pressure if you run five rounds of hearts. You keep all four spades and your top clubs in hand, coming down to the bare diamond queen. But what does West keep?
If he pitches a spade, you ruff out that suit while you still have a club re-entry to hand; while if he comes down to one club, your clubs will be good. So West also must come down to one diamond. That has to be the king (or ace), or you can establish a diamond trick.
Now you cash the sixth trump and pitch your last diamond, and West must again keep all his spades and clubs to keep you from establishing either suit. So he, too, discards his last diamond, and that lets you lead the king and another spade, aiming to cover East’s card to keep him off lead.
West wins cheaply and must play back a low spade, but you win that, then endplay him in spades to lead clubs into your tenace. Your initial goal on the deal was to avoid losing three diamond winners; in fact, you ended up losing no diamond tricks at all!