July 24th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 5 Comments
Fairy tales are more than true — not because they tell us dragons exist, but because they tell us dragons can be beaten.
Neil Gaiman
| N |
North |
| N-S |
♠ 8
♥ J 8 6 2
♦ A K J 10 9 6
♣ A J |
| West |
East |
♠ 9 6 2
♥ A Q 9 7
♦ 7
♣ Q 9 6 3 2 |
♠ Q 10 7 5 4 3
♥ K 3
♦ Q 4 3
♣ K 10 |
| South |
♠ A K J
♥ 10 5 4
♦ 8 5 2
♣ 8 7 5 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♦ |
1 ♠ |
| 1 NT |
2 ♠ |
3 NT |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♠2
Despite your sixth spade, you essentially have a run-of-the-mill overcall with no extra values or shape. The question is whether to rebid two spades or pass the auction to your partner to describe his hand. It feels right to pass to me; but give me the spade jack instead of a small spade, and I’d rebid two spades. If the redouble shows two spades, bidding two spades now seems reasonable.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 10 7 5 4 3
♥ K 3
♦ Q 4 3
♣ K 10 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
1 ♣ |
| 1 ♠ |
Dbl. |
Rdbl. |
2 ♣ |
| ? |
|
|
|
July 23rd, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Monday, July 9th, 2018
Technique in a pianist never impressed me. I never in my life heard a pianist whom I liked just because of his technique. The moment they start to play very fast I want to go home.
Vladimir Horowitz on Heinrich Neuhaus
| W |
North |
| Both |
♠ J 7
♥ 7 5 3
♦ Q J 7
♣ K J 9 7 5 |
| West |
East |
♠ A K 6 4 3
♥ Q 8 6 2
♦ 10 9 6
♣ 4 |
♠ Q 5 2
♥ 9
♦ A 3 2
♣ Q 10 8 6 3 2 |
| South |
♠ 10 9 8
♥ A K J 10 4
♦ K 8 5 4
♣ A |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
Pass |
Pass |
| 1 ♥ |
1 ♠ |
2 ♥ |
2 ♠ |
| 3 ♦ |
Pass |
3 ♥ |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♠K
We’ll see later this week what works here. You’d expect dummy to have big trump support plus maybe a club void and a source of tricks. The choice seems to be between spades and diamonds, and my instincts are that dummy is more likely to have long spades than diamonds, making a diamond lead more attractive. (It would have been the winner today.)
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ 9 5 3
♥ Q 2
♦ 10 8 3
♣ Q 10 7 4 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♣ |
1 ♥ |
| Pass |
6 ♥ |
All pass |
|
July 22nd, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
|
I understand that opener’s jump shift at his second turn is forcing to game. Is there a way for responder to hit the brakes after this start to a sequence?
Trapper John, Atlantic City, N.J.
Some people use the same basic idea that they employ over a reverse, a call that is forcing for one round but not to game. They play that responder’s only weak action is the cheaper of fourth suit and two no-trump. So after opener opens one club and jumps to two spades over a one-diamond response, responder’s two no-trump call is artificial and weak. Over opener’s jump to two hearts, a call of two spades would similarly be weak.
In a recent article, you described dealing and picking up a hand of ♠ K-J-9-8-3, ♥ A-9, ♦ J-6, ♣ Q-7-4-2. Passing worked well with this hand, but I must admit I would have opened the bidding with one spade. What are the precise criteria for bidding or passing here?
Fishhooks Miami, Fla.
This hand is a marginal opening bid. While opening would not be out of line, the possibly awkward rebid over a response of two diamonds or two hearts argue against bidding. With a side suit of hearts or even possibly diamonds, the rebid problem looks less awkward. Non-vulnerable at pairs, I might open, but I would surely pass if vulnerable.
Please discuss how modern experts use a jump to five no-trump these days. Has the grand slam force gone the way of the landline telephone?
Old-fashioned, Newport News, Va.
The use of Key-card Blackwood among many experts has led many top players to use the call of five no-trump as a maneuver to try to locate the right strain, a “choice-of-slam” request. This helps the partnership identify strong or long suits when there is some ambiguity about the best fit.
|
Is there a role for asking bids, as opposed to cue-bids, these days?
Filet Mignon, Washington, D.C.
Asking bids fit well into a strong club base, but (with the exception of some Danish experts) top players tend to use a cue-bidding style instead. The closest thing to asking bids in common usage might be fourthsuit calls to look for a stopper, not a control.
When you play two-over-one and a semi-forcing no-trump with ♠ A-K-7-3, ♥ K-J-4-3-2, ♦ Q-6-4, ♣ 9, you would open one heart, I assume. But if you hear a one-no-trump response, do you pass or rebid two diamonds, two hearts or two spades?
Blinky Bill, Selma, Ala.
Clearly, a two-spade rebid is out; that shows at least an ace more than your current hand. Rebidding two hearts with a weak suit is unattractive, so the choice is to pass (which I would do if the diamond four were the club four) or bid two diamonds, which suggests but does not guarantee four. I prefer to bid two diamonds, but on the actual hand I’d be more likely to pass if my partner were a passed hand, since I won’t be facing a limit raise in hearts. And since a response of two clubs would be artificial (Drury), that means he is more likely to have length in clubs than any other suit.
|
July 21st, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 8 Comments
That wild-goose chase of yours is going to lay an egg.— Lou Costello in “The Wistful
Wagon Gap”
| S |
North |
| Both |
♠ K 3 2
♥ A 5 2
♦ Q J 4 2
♣ Q 10 8 |
| West |
East |
♠ 8 6 4
♥ J 10 4 3
♦ 10 9 6
♣ 9 4 2 |
♠ A Q J 10 7 5
♥ K
♦ A 8 7 5
♣ 7 5 |
| South |
♠ 9
♥ Q 9 8 7 6
♦ K 3
♣ A K J 6 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♥ |
Pass |
2 ♦ |
2 ♠ |
| 3 ♣ |
Pass |
3 ♥ |
Pass |
| 4 ♥ |
All pass |
|
|
♠4
This hand is not really worth a drive to game. The choice is whether to cue-bid two clubs en route to two no-trump, or just to jump directly to two no-trump. I prefer the latter route, since the first sequence might suggest a four-card major. I only want to play a major if my partner can introduce it voluntarily, suggesting a five-card suit.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K 3 2
♥ A 5 2
♦ Q J 4 2
♣ Q 10 8 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♣ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
July 20th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 5 Comments
As distrust, in some sense, is the mother of safety, so security is the gate of danger. A man had need to fear this most of all, that he fears not at all.
Thomas Brooks
| N |
North |
| E-W |
♠ K 7 6
♥ A 4
♦ A K 8 7 6 5 3
♣ 6 |
| West |
East |
♠ J 9 8 2
♥ K J 6 2
♦ 2
♣ A 9 8 4 |
♠ 3
♥ Q 9 7 5
♦ J 9 4
♣ K Q J 10 5 |
| South |
♠ A Q 10 5 4
♥ 10 8 3
♦ Q 10
♣ 7 3 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♦ |
Pass |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
3 ♦ |
Pass |
| 3 ♠ |
Pass |
4 ♣ |
Pass |
| 4 ♠ |
All pass |
|
|
♦2
Illogical as it might seem, this hand is closer to driving to three no-trump than it is to a pass of two spades. Your intermediates, especially the spade 10, suggest that you might make game on very few values altogether if you can set up spades. I would bid two no-trump, but would have sympathy for a jump to three no-trump.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A Q 10 5 4
♥ 10 8 3
♦ Q 10
♣ 7 3 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 NT |
Pass |
| 2 ♥ |
Pass |
2 ♠ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
July 19th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
The need for mystery is greater than the need for an answer.
Ken Kesey
| S |
North |
| E-W |
♠ Q 6
♥ A 8 5 4
♦ 10 6 4
♣ K 7 6 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ K 8 5 4 3
♥ K J 9 3
♦ 7
♣ A 9 3 |
♠ 7
♥ 10 6
♦ Q J 9 5 3 2
♣ J 10 8 4 |
| South |
♠ A J 10 9 2
♥ Q 7 2
♦ A K 8
♣ Q 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 NT |
2 ♣ * |
3 NT |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
*Majors
♠4
Although your heart honors are well placed, you can see that you have no real fit for partner’s suits, so no source of tricks. It looks logical here to bid two no-trump, the value of your hand, rather than jump to the no-trump game. If partner passes, I’d expect you to struggle to come to eight tricks.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K 8 5 4 3
♥ K J 9 3
♦ 7
♣ A 9 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♦ |
1 ♥ |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
2 ♣ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
July 18th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 15 Comments
Never wrestle with a pig. You’ll both get dirty, but the pig will like it.
Irish proverb
| S |
North |
| Both |
♠ K Q J 10
♥ J 2
♦ 10 7 5 2
♣ Q 8 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ 7 3 2
♥ 10 9 7
♦ Q J 8 4
♣ K 9 5 |
♠ 9 8 6 4
♥ 8 6 5 3
♦ 6
♣ J 10 4 2 |
| South |
♠ A 5
♥ A K Q 4
♦ A K 9 3
♣ A 7 6 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 2 ♣ |
Pass |
2 ♦ |
Pass |
| 2 NT |
Pass |
4 NT |
Pass |
| 5 NT * |
Pass |
6 ♠ |
Pass |
| 6 NT |
All pass |
|
|
*Pick a slam
♥10
Facing what you hope is a maximum pass, you should try to compete in a major suit. It looks sensible to try to make partner declarer to protect his tenaces, and you want to try to find a 4-4 major-suit fit. The easiest way here is to cue-bid two diamonds to get your partner to pick a major.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K Q J 10
♥ 10 7 5 2
♦ J 2
♣ Q 8 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
Pass |
1 ♦ |
| Pass |
Pass |
Dbl. |
1 NT |
| ? |
|
|
|
July 17th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 24 Comments
Science has taught us how to put the atom to work. But to make it work for good instead of for evil lies in the domain dealing with the principles of human duty. We are now facing a problem more of ethics than physics.
Bernard Baruch
| S |
North |
| N-S |
♠ K 4 3
♥ 5 3
♦ 9 8 7 3 2
♣ A Q J |
| West |
East |
♠ 9
♥ A K Q J 7
♦ K J 6
♣ 9 6 4 3 |
♠ 10 7 6 2
♥ 9 6
♦ 10 5 4
♣ 10 8 7 2 |
| South |
♠ A Q J 8 5
♥ 10 8 4 2
♦ A Q
♣ K 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♠ |
2 ♥ |
2 ♠ |
Pass |
| 2 NT |
Pass |
4 ♠ |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♥K
Your partner has a minimum take-out double, and you have a hand with no clear direction, but your trumps are too weak to consider defending. I’d bid two no-trump, which is not to play (though if partner forgets, you won’t mind too much!), but suggests partner bid a minor. You surely have longer diamonds than clubs, or you would bid three clubs yourself.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K 4 3
♥ 5 3
♦ 9 8 7 3 2
♣ A Q J |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
1 ♦ |
| Pass |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
1 NT |
| Pass |
2 ♠ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
July 16th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 13 Comments
The fundamental principles and indispensable postulates of every genuinely productive science are not based on pure logic but rather on the metaphysical hypothesis — which no rules of logic can refute — that there exists an outer world which is entirely independent of ourselves.
Max Planck
| S |
North |
| N-S |
♠ 6 2
♥ Q 8 2
♦ Q 10 8 7 6 2
♣ J 7 |
| West |
East |
♠ 10 8 7 4 3
♥ A 6 5
♦ 5
♣ K 10 9 5 |
♠ J 5
♥ K 10 7 3
♦ A J 3
♣ Q 8 6 2 |
| South |
♠ A K Q 9
♥ J 9 4
♦ K 9 4
♣ A 4 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 NT |
All pass |
|
|
♠4
While you might engineer a trump promotion by leading hearts, that’s likely to set up discards for declarer. It is simpler and more logical to lead the diamond jack to try to set up tricks or force declarer to trump. If in doubt, assume that when you have been dealt a sequence, you should lead it, hoping that your problem will come at trick two, not trick one.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ 10 7 6 2
♥ 9 6
♦ J 10 4
♣ 10 8 7 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♥ |
Pass |
1 ♠ |
| Pass |
3 ♠ |
Pass |
4 ♠ |
| All pass |
|
|
|
July 15th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 7 Comments
|
I held ♠ K-9-4-3, ♥ 10-5-3, ♦ Q-10-4-2, ♣ J-4 and raised my partner’s opening bid of one spade to two. What is the right continuation over a call of three diamonds from my partner?
Phoenix Rising, Grenada, Miss.
My partnership style is to use new suits here as a game try. Typically, the call is based on length, with a holding of three or four cards to an honor, so your hand has two big plusses: one based on your decent long trumps, and the other your useful diamond holding, which rates to cover some of your partner’s losers. So I would bid game. By the way, with the club ace instead of the jack, I would raise to four diamonds or cuebid four clubs, in case partner has a slam try.
My partner suggested to me that we play fit jumps, which I am happy with. He also suggested that new suits in response to pre-empts be based on fit, not a single-suited hand. I’m not sure I buy into that. Do you?
Assister Sledge, Chicago, Ill.
I will say that as a passed hand (which has therefore almost denied a decent onesuiter), a new suit in response to a pre-empt ought to be lead-directing. By an unpassed hand, especially if your RHO has passed, I think a new suit should be natural and forcing.
I held: ♠ K-4, ♥ A-9-8-3-2, ♦ 9, ♣ A-Q-7-5-4 and opened one heart, then rebid two clubs over a one-spade response. Now I heard my partner rebid two no-trump, and I was not sure whether to bid or pass. If I did bid, what call would describe my hand best?
Flower Power, Atlanta, Ga.
I wouldn’t pass, but I believe that three clubs should show a minimum hand with 5-5 shape, a non-forcing call. So I would either raise to three no-trump or, if feeling scientific, I might experiment with a call of three diamonds, which I believe should be reserved for a forcing hand with 5-5 shape. A rebid of three hearts here shows a 6-4 pattern, and would also be forcing.
|
What is the right approach to playing the combination of four small cards facing A-J-9-x-x in dummy, assuming you have plenty of entries back and forth? I can see three sensible ways of playing the suit: starting with the ace, leading to the jack or leading to the nine. Which is the odds-on play?
Math Observation, Little Rock, Ark.
Cashing the ace loses to a void or singleton small card to your left. Low to the jack loses to a void or singleton honor to your left. Low to the nine and finessing a second time loses to the singleton 10 or K-Q doubleton on your left, but not to the 4-0 break, so it is the right play.
Do you prefer to play jump raises of partner’s opening bid or overcall as weak, mixed or invitational? Does it matter whether the opponents have bid (either to your left or right)? And is the vulnerability critical?
Razor Sharp, San Luis Obispo, Calif.
In non-competitive auctions, a raise to three seems best as a limit raise (though playing it as mixed is acceptable). I don’t like a pre-emptive raise with silent opponents. After partner opens and you hear a double or an overcall, I can understand having the raise as pre-emptive — as long as you have a way to show a mixed raise. If partner overcalls, using the raise as pre-emptive makes sense.
|
|
In today’s deal, the Three Little Pigs were all declarers in three no-trump on broadly similar auctions, but with very different results.
At each table, East and West bid and raised spades, but North put his partner into three no-trump. Both the spade two and nine make sense on opening lead here — I prefer the nine. In order to succeed, South must carefully decide on a way forward.
The first little pig cashed his three spade winners, pitching a heart and club from dummy. When he played on diamonds, East could win and cash out the spades, then the hearts for down four.
The second little pig was more cautious. He won the first spade and played on diamonds at once from the top, expecting the defenders to continue spades. But West discarded a spade and a club on the second and third diamonds. East shifted to the heart king, and that let West take the top hearts and exit in clubs, for down one.
The third little pig found the golden mean between cashing spades and abandoning them. He cashed precisely one more spade, discarding a club, then led a diamond to the jack. If that held the trick, the diamonds would run; if it lost, the diamond eight would serve as a re-entry to the South hand to allow him to cash the last spade winner.
Have you notice what might happen if South finesses in diamonds at trick two? At double-dummy, East can duck the first diamond. Now declarer has no reentry to his hand and only eight tricks.