March 31st, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 8 Comments
The riddles of God are more satisfying than the solutions of man.
G.K. Chesterton
| N |
North |
| None |
♠ Q 9
♥ Q 10 5
♦ Q 6 4 2
♣ A K J 5 |
| West |
East |
♠ K J 8 6 4 2
♥ J 4 3 2
♦ K 7
♣ 4 |
♠ A 10 7 5 3
♥ 9 7 6
♦ A
♣ Q 10 6 2 |
| South |
♠ —
♥ A K 8
♦ J 10 9 8 5 3
♣ 9 8 7 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♣ |
1 ♠ |
| 2 ♦ |
4 ♠ |
5 ♦ |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♠K
Everyone has their own set of rules to live by, in life as in bridge. One of my personal principles is that when opening a hand 4-4 in the minors, I bid the suit I want partner to lead. I don’t care which suit I bid when I have equal suits, but I feel very strongly that if defending here, I want partner to lead clubs, not diamonds. Does your partner always lead the right thing? If not, help him out!
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 9
♥ Q 10 5
♦ Q 6 4 2
♣ A K J 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
March 30th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 8 Comments
This is not the end; it is not the beginning of the end. But it is perhaps the end of the beginning.
William Churchill
| N |
North |
| Both |
♠ Q J 10 2
♥ A 9
♦ K 7 6 5
♣ Q J 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ 6
♥ K Q J 8 3
♦ Q J 9 8 3
♣ A 7 |
♠ K 7 5 3
♥ 7 4 2
♦ 10
♣ 10 9 8 5 3 |
| South |
♠ A 9 8 4
♥ 10 6 5
♦ A 4 2
♣ K 6 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♦ |
Pass |
| 1 ♠ |
2 ♥ |
2 ♠ |
3 ♥ |
| 4 ♠ |
All pass |
|
|
♥K
Facing a balancing double, the cue-bid does not normally promise a second call facing any minimum action by the doubler. So here, a call of two spades by you would not be forcing, and since you do not have anything more than a minimum opener, there is no reason to drive to game. With an extra queen you might cue-bid to set up a game force.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ Q J 10 2
♥ A 9
♦ K 7 6 5
♣ Q J 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♥ |
Pass |
Pass |
| Dbl. |
Pass |
2 ♥ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
March 29th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
Every advantage in the past is judged in the light of the final issue.
Demosthenes
| E |
North |
| None |
♠ J 8 7 4
♥ A
♦ A 8 2
♣ A 9 8 5 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ K 10 6 5 2
♥ 5
♦ Q 10 6 3
♣ J 6 3 |
♠ A Q 9 3
♥ K 9 7 4 3 2
♦ 9
♣ 10 4 |
| South |
♠ —
♥ Q J 10 8 6
♦ K J 7 5 4
♣ K Q 7 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
1 ♥ |
| Pass |
1 NT* |
2 ♣ |
2 ♠ |
| 3 ♦ |
Pass |
5 ♦ |
Pass |
| Pass |
Dbl. |
All pass |
|
*Spades
♠2
The traditional methods in use here mean that your two-diamond cue-bid is forcing to suit agreement. This means that (for example) if you raised two hearts to three hearts here, it would be non-forcing. If, however, you bid two spades, that is natural and forcing for one round. Your partner could make a non-forcing call of two no-trump or three spades, but you will drive to game one way or another.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ J 8 7 4
♥ A
♦ A 8 2
♣ A 9 8 5 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♦ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| 2 ♦ |
Pass |
2 ♥ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
March 28th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
The capacity to contemplate … the harmonious elegance in Nature’s manifestations, is one of the most satisfactory experiences of which man is capable.
Dr. Hans Selye
| N |
North |
| N-S |
♠ J 4
♥ A Q 7 3
♦ Q J 5 2
♣ 10 6 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ K 9 3
♥ J 10 5 4
♦ K
♣ K Q J 9 7 |
♠ Q 8 7 6
♥ 9 8 2
♦ 10 9 8 7 3
♣ 3 |
| South |
♠ A 10 5 2
♥ K 6
♦ A 6 4
♣ A 8 5 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
Pass |
Pass |
| 1 NT |
Dbl.* |
2 ♣ |
Pass |
| 2 ♠ |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
*Long minor plus a major
♣K
Your hand is on the cusp of inviting game, but with all your values in the suits where partner is short, the more discreet action is simply to bid two spades rather than to invite game with a call of two no-trump. You might tip me the other way if you had the spade 10 in addition to your other values.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ J 4
♥ A Q 7 3
♦ Q J 5 2
♣ 10 6 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♠ |
Pass |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
2 ♣ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
March 27th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 5 Comments
I wasn’t lurking. I was standing about. It’s a whole different vibe.
Steven S. DeKnight
| W |
North |
| E-W |
♠ Q 6 5 2
♥ —
♦ K 9 6 5 3
♣ J 10 6 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ A K J 10 7 4
♥ A K 10 8 7
♦ 4
♣ 3 |
♠ 9 3
♥ 5 4 3 2
♦ Q 10 8 2
♣ Q 5 4 |
| South |
♠ 8
♥ Q J 9 6
♦ A J 7
♣ A K 9 8 7 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
Pass |
| Dbl. |
3 ♥ |
Pass |
4 ♥ |
| Pass |
Pass |
4 NT |
Pass |
| 5 ♣ |
Dbl. |
All pass |
|
♠K
The question is whether to pass and leave well enough alone, or raise to three clubs. I think passing is right since you are not especially worried about the opponents competing, plus your soft honors in spades and diamonds are not ideal for play in clubs. I’d consider raising if partner had responded two diamonds, not two clubs — or if the spade queen were the ace.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 6 5 2
♥ —
♦ K 9 6 5 3
♣ J 10 6 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♥ |
Pass |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
2 ♣ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
March 26th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 13 Comments
Take note, take note, O world! To be direct and honest is not safe.
William Shakespeare
| W |
North |
| Both |
♠ K J 6 5 2
♥ 5
♦ Q 10 9 5 4
♣ J 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ A 9 7 4
♥ J 9
♦ J 6 3 2
♣ 7 5 4 |
♠ Q 10 8
♥ Q 10 8 6 4 2
♦ 8 7
♣ Q 9 |
| South |
♠ 3
♥ A K 7 3
♦ A K
♣ A K 10 8 6 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
Pass |
2 ♥ |
| Dbl. |
Pass |
3 ♠ |
Pass |
| 6 ♣ |
All pass |
|
|
♥J
Even though declarer rates to be relatively long in clubs, it still feels logical to lead that suit, since partner can hardly have a decent five-card major without having overcalled. Partner’s failure to act means that the best bet to set the game may be to find dummy with both majors, relatively short in clubs.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 4
♥ J 5 3
♦ J 10 6 2
♣ Q 10 5 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♦ |
Pass |
1 NT |
| Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
|
March 25th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
|
Now that we have been granted the right to open one no-trump with a singleton, does that require us to make some changes in our styles to respond to one no-trump? One example might be not using a Texas transfer with six weak trumps, and generally not jumping to game in a major, since you do not know if opener has a singleton in your six-card major. What do you suggest in such cases?
Keeping Count, Cedar Rapids, Iowa
Generally, a singleton honor facing a reasonable six-card suit won’t be too bad. So no changes are really necessary, except maybe to treat six small cards as a five-card suit. But my advice regarding singleton honors and no-trump openers coincides with Punch’s advice to men considering marriage: “Don’t!”
Holding ♠ Q-10-7-3-2, ♥ A-4, ♦ K-7-4, ♣ 10-9-3, I passed initially and responded one spade to my partner’s one-heart bid. When he raised to two spades, was I supposed to make a game-try? I passed, and although my partner had only three spades, he had a singleton club, so four spades would have been easy to make.
Hindsight, Monterey, Calif.
You certainly had an awkward decision. Your partner will quite often raise one spade to two (even facing a passed hand) with three trumps in an unbalanced or semi-balanced hand. I think you are close to a three-diamond game try, and if vulnerable at teams, I would indeed bid on. At pairs, I suspect I’m supposed to be trying to ensure the plus score here, so I would pass.
Please explain my ethical obligations when my LHO opens with a pre-empt and I judge that my partner has been thinking of acting. When the auction comes back to me and I have either a clear action or a marginal one, what should I do?
Straight and Narrow, Springfield, Mass.
If you judge that your partner’s demeanor or tempo points you in a specific direction, you are not supposed to take that action — unless you believe there are no logical alternatives to that action. Hence, in your example, bid if you have a clear action, but pass with any action you deem marginal. If you have a choice of calls, take the action that you consider counterindicated by your partner’s tempo.
|
With neither side vulnerable, my partner in a teams game decided to open one diamond rather than one no-trump, holding ♠ K-Q, ♥ K-9, ♦ K-9-7-4-3, ♣ K-Q-10-4. Do you agree? I responded one spade, and she rebid two clubs, at which point I raised to three clubs. Is it better to pass or bid now, and if the latter, what call is most appropriate?
Movin’ on Up, Sedona, Ariz.
The auction is fine as far as it goes, though no one could argue against a no-trump opener. But your partner is missing four aces and the minor trump honors, which argues for caution, not aggression. You must surely have two aces, so how could game be much worse than a finesse in a red suit? With the heart king protected, I might gamble on five clubs rather than three no-trump.
You often recommend books on bridge play and bidding. I’m about to order my first. Which do you recommend? I’m playing duplicate now, and I want to improve.
Vampire Slayer, Texarkana, Texas
For an early duplicate book, I suggest Norman Kay’s “The Complete Book of Duplicate Bridge.” Mike Lawrence’s books on play, bidding and competitive auctions are also excellent. You have read Watson’s “Play of the Hand,” I assume? That is one of the best books written on bridge, more than 80 years ago.
|
March 24th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Saturday, March 10th, 2018
Out of the crooked timber of humanity, no straight thing was ever made.
Immanuel Kant
| S |
North |
| E-W |
♠ A
♥ 10 9 8 6 3
♦ A 10 5 2
♣ Q 10 7 |
| West |
East |
♠ K Q J 10 8 6 2
♥ 5
♦ 9
♣ J 6 5 2 |
♠ 9 5 3
♥ 7 4 2
♦ Q J 8 7
♣ 9 8 3 |
| South |
♠ 7 4
♥ A K Q J
♦ K 6 4 3
♣ A K 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♣* |
3 ♠ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| 4 ♥ |
Pass |
4 ♠ |
Pass |
| 6 ♦ |
Pass |
6 ♥ |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
*16 or more
♠K
While it is perfectly possible that nine tricks are the limit of the hand in spades, you certainly have enough to move on to game. The question is which game to attempt. I think four spades will play better facing any hand that has a singleton — be it in hearts, diamonds or clubs. So I would bid four spades, not three no-trump.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A
♥ 10 9 8 6 3
♦ A 10 5 2
♣ Q 10 7 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♠ |
Pass |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
3 ♠ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
March 23rd, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 8 Comments
Made it, Ma! Top of the world!
Cody Jarrett, in “White Heat”
| E |
North |
| N-S |
♠ J 9
♥ A K Q J 9 8 3
♦ 7 4
♣ 9 5 |
| West |
East |
♠ 10 6 5 3
♥ 7
♦ 10 9 8 6 5 2
♣ K 8 |
♠ Q 8 2
♥ 10 6 5
♦ A K J 3
♣ 7 6 4 |
| South |
♠ A K 7 4
♥ 4 2
♦ Q
♣ A Q J 10 3 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
Pass |
| 1 ♣ |
Pass |
4 ♦* |
Pass |
| 4 NT |
Pass |
5 ♠ |
Pass |
| 6 ♥ |
All pass |
|
|
*Strong heart single-suiter
♦10
Should you simply drive to three no-trump here and rely on finding a club stopper opposite? The wiser call of three clubs will ask your partner to bid three no-trump if he can, since the opponents have announced clubs as the danger suit. Incidentally, it makes sense here to play that the no-trump opener should pass the double without a club stopper, then describe his hand if his partner redoubles.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 8 2
♥ 10 6 5
♦ A K J 3
♣ 7 6 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 NT |
Pass |
| 2 ♣ |
Dbl. |
2 ♦ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
March 22nd, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 5 Comments
For evil news rides post, while good news baits.
John Milton
| S |
North |
| None |
♠ 8 6 4 3 2
♥ A 10 5
♦ 10 2
♣ Q 6 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ 7
♥ Q J 8 7 2
♦ K 8 4 3
♣ 9 7 3 |
♠ Q 10 5
♥ K 3
♦ J 9 6 5
♣ J 10 8 2 |
| South |
♠ A K J 9
♥ 9 6 4
♦ A Q 7
♣ A K 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 2 NT |
Pass |
3 ♣ |
Pass |
| 3 ♠ |
Pass |
4 ♠ |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♥Q
You could make a sensible case for bidding one no-trump here to try to make it more difficult for the opponents to compete. On the other hand, if they do bid two of a major, will you or your partner know whether to bid on to three diamonds? This is a strong argument for raising to two diamonds at once, and letting partner raise if the opponents compete in a major.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 10 5
♥ K 3
♦ J 9 6 5
♣ J 10 8 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♦ |
Dbl. |
| ? |
|
|
|
|
Today’s deal comes from the second round of the 2017 Vanderbilt Trophy in Kansas City, Missouri, in which Johan Sylvan and Frederic Wrang faced Tor Helness and Geir Helgemo of Pierre Zimmermann’s squad.
Helgemo stretched to introduce his diamonds at his first turn to speak, making the overbid because he knew the opponents were about to up the ante in spades. A moment later, he found himself in five diamonds, against which West led the spade king, ruffed. Take a look at all four hands, and you will see that the defenders appear to have two diamond tricks and two club tricks. What could go wrong for them?
Declarer crossed to the heart queen, ruffed dummy’s remaining spade and cashed the heart ace-king. When both defenders followed, declarer played dummy’s diamond queen to East’s ace.
At this point, East was down to all black cards, so he exited with a spade — as good as anything. Helgemo ruffed in dummy and carefully cashed the ace and king of clubs before playing another trump. West was endplayed whether he ruffed in on the club king or not. When he won his diamond king, he had to concede a second ruff-sluff, and declarer ruffed in dummy again, pitching his last club loser.
This pretty line would only fail under one circumstance: If East had started with four hearts (giving West a 5=4=2=2 pattern), East could defeat the contract by playing the last heart when in with the trump ace, as West would then have been able to ruff with the diamond king and exit in clubs.