April 23rd, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 9 Comments
When vain desire at last and vain regret Go hand in hand to death and all is vain, What shall assuage the unforgotten pain And teach the unforgetful to forget?
Dante Gabriel Rossetti
| N |
North |
| None |
♠ J
♥ Q 8 5 3
♦ A K Q 9 8 6 5
♣ 5 |
| West |
East |
♠ A K Q 10 7 6 3
♥ K 7 4
♦ 2
♣ 3 2 |
♠ 9 8 5 4 2
♥ A J 2
♦ J 3
♣ 8 7 6 |
| South |
♠ —
♥ 10 9 6
♦ 10 7 4
♣ A K Q J 10 9 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♦ |
Pass |
| 2 ♣ |
2 ♠ |
3 ♦ |
4 ♠ |
| 5 ♣ |
5 ♠ |
Pass |
Pass |
| 6 ♣ |
6 ♠ |
Pass |
Pass |
| 7 ♣ |
All pass |
|
|
♦2
I could imagine leading the diamond king, trying to cash two or three tricks in the suit on the go, but dummy rates to be relatively short in diamonds, so I might not accomplish much by this lead. An alternative approach, which I prefer, might be to lead trumps, hoping the hearts will not run for declarer, and that I can stop the cross-ruff.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ 10 4 3
♥ J 5 3 2
♦ K 7
♣ Q 10 8 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♥ |
Pass |
1 ♠ |
| Pass |
2 ♠ |
Pass |
3 ♣ |
| Pass |
4 ♠ |
All pass |
|
April 22nd, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 2 Comments
|
Holding ♠ A-9-3, ♥ A-Q-4-2, ♦ 4, ♣ A-Q-7-3-2, I opened one club and raised the response of one heart to three. When my partner bid three spades, I cooperated with four clubs, and my partner now went back to four hearts. Should I have bid on — and if so, with what?
On My Uppers, Tucson, Ariz.
Your partner’s initial cue-bid promised at least slam interest (or else he would simply have signed off in game), but he rates to have no diamond control. Since you have diamonds controlled, I would trot out Blackwood, or Key-Card Blackwood if that is in your armory. Because your partner made a slam try, apparently without any aces, he is guaranteed to hold strong trumps.
At the start of play, what characteristics of either declarer’s or dummy’s hand might call your attention to the possibility of a squeeze?
Bridge Nut, Arlington, Texas
Typically, the possibilities for a squeeze exist when declarer arrives at a point where he has top winners, but slow rather than fast losers, and is one trick short of having the rest of the tricks. If you are simply missing an ace, you normally have to lose it. When you have all but one of the tricks in top winners, or can arrange to reach such a position, the possibility of legitimate (or illegitimate) pressure should be uppermost in your mind.
In New Minor (or checkback Stayman after opener’s rebid of one no-trump), can or should opener jump after his partner uses the relay? For example, with ♠ Q-10-2, ♥ K-5, ♦ A-8-7-3-2, ♣ K-10-4, if you rebid one no-trump after your partner’s one-spade response, might you jump to three spades over a two-club relay using two spades for a minimum hand with three spades?
Fine Weather Friend, Boise, Idaho
Absolutely yes. I often think that opener should take more advantage of the three-level responses, in some cases to show both minors when appropriate, but also to bid out hand pattern when he has had to rebid one no-trump with a singleton in partner’s suit.
|
I read your column online, and I am interested in how the expert players differ from us mortals. Do any of the top bridge players possess photographic memories?
Snapping Turtle, Cape Town, South Africa
I don’t know of any, but among past players, Oswald Jacoby had an eidetic memory, able to recall everything he saw, including bridge hands. Al Roth and Australian Tim Seres had similarly great recall, but there is also much to be said for the ability to forget every deal instantaneously once it is over. That way you focus on the new one with full concentration.
Holding ♠ K-2, ♥ Q-7-2, ♦ A-Q-9-8-4, ♣ Q-5-2, I opened one diamond, and my partner responded one heart. The next player bid two clubs, and I passed because although I might raise with three, I did not like my club or heart holding. My partner sold out (he had 4-4-3-2 pattern and eight points), and the opponents made two clubs when we could have made at least eight tricks in diamonds. Who, if anyone, was to blame?
Undercooked, Grand Junction, Colo.
If not playing support doubles — which I am lukewarm about — where your double would show three-card trump support, your action was surely correct. While you are allowed to raise with three trumps, I would need the heart jack to make that call. Conversely, your partner had just enough to bid over two clubs — the choice being between a take-out double or a raise to two diamonds. Neither is perfect, though, I admit.
|
April 21st, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
Good luck in most cases comes through the misfortune of others.
Jackie Stewart
| N |
North |
| E-W |
♠ A 4 2
♥ J 6 2
♦ J 8
♣ A K 8 4 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ 9 7
♥ 10 9 8 4
♦ A 10 9 6 4 3
♣ 7 |
♠ Q 10 3
♥ K Q 5
♦ K 5 2
♣ J 10 9 5 |
| South |
♠ K J 8 6 5
♥ A 7 3
♦ Q 7
♣ Q 6 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♣ |
Pass |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
2 ♠ |
Pass |
| 4 ♠ |
All pass |
|
|
♥10
When your partner has two equivalent cue-bids available (two diamonds and two hearts), the higher cue-bid should show four trumps, and the lower should show three. It is technically possible that your partner has six diamonds here, but let’s not confuse “technically possible” with the more normal hand type we see here. I’d bid two spades since I have nothing to spare for my earlier action.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K J 8 5 3
♥ A 7 3
♦ Q 7
♣ Q 6 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♦ |
Pass |
1 ♥ |
| 1 ♠ |
2 ♣ |
2 ♦ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
April 20th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 8 Comments
Thus happiness depends, as Nature shows, Less on exterior things than most suppose.
William Cowper
| W |
North |
| None |
♠ A K Q 4 3 2
♥ Q 4 2
♦ Q 4 2
♣ 8 |
| West |
East |
♠ 10 8 5
♥ J 9 3
♦ 10 7 6
♣ J 5 4 2 |
♠ J 9 7 6
♥ 8 6
♦ K J 3
♣ K Q 6 3 |
| South |
♠ —
♥ A K 10 7 5
♦ A 9 8 5
♣ A 10 9 7 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
| 2 ♥ |
Pass |
2 ♠ |
Pass |
| 3 ♣ |
Pass |
3 ♥ |
Pass |
| 3 NT |
Pass |
4 ♣ |
Pass |
| 4 ♦ |
Pass |
4 ♠ |
Pass |
| 6 ♣ |
Pass |
6 ♥ |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♥3
Your side does not appear to have an eight-card fit, and your partner surely rates to have a minimum opener, or he would have found a call at his second turn. While defending two clubs undoubled may not be your best possible score, it may well be the best result possible that you can achieve. So I would pass now.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ J 9 7 6
♥ 8 6
♦ K J 3
♣ K Q 6 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
1 ♥ |
Pass |
| 1 ♠ |
2 ♣ |
Pass |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
April 19th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 3 Comments
When I play with my cat, who knows whether she is amusing herself more with me than I am with her?
Montesquieu
| S |
North |
| None |
♠ A J 8 7 6
♥ K J 7
♦ K J
♣ 8 7 5 |
| West |
East |
♠ 10 4
♥ 10 3
♦ Q 7 2
♣ Q J 10 9 6 2 |
♠ 9
♥ Q 9 4 2
♦ A 9 8 6 5 3
♣ A 4 |
| South |
♠ K Q 5 3 2
♥ A 8 6 5
♦ 10 4
♣ K 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♠ |
3 ♣ |
4 ♣ |
Pass |
| 4 ♠ |
All pass |
|
|
♣Q
Had your RHO not doubled, you would have bid two hearts, of course. So should you now ignore the likelihood that there is heart length on your right and make the two-heart bid anyway? I’m not sure of the answer here. I’d certainly bid a better heart suit, but that doesn’t feel necessary here. I think I would pass and await further developments.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K Q 5 3 2
♥ A 8 6 5
♦ 10 4
♣ K 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
1 NT |
Dbl. |
| ? |
|
|
|
April 18th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 5 Comments
many languages fly around the world producing sparks when they collide sometimes of hate sometimes of love
Bei Dao
| E |
North |
| None |
♠ Q 8 7
♥ 9 7 3
♦ Q 9 5 2
♣ A Q J |
| West |
East |
♠ J 9 5
♥ A 2
♦ A 8 7 4 3
♣ 8 6 2 |
♠ 4
♥ K J 10 8 5 4
♦ K 10 6
♣ 9 5 4 |
| South |
♠ A K 10 6 3 2
♥ Q 6
♦ J
♣ K 10 7 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
2 ♥ |
| 2 ♠ |
Pass |
4 ♠ |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♥A
You described your hand perfectly at your first turn; if your partner wanted to play hearts, he would have passed when doubled. But he decided to run, and who are you to say that he is wrong? The optimal way to get to the better minor suit fit is to bid two no-trump and redouble if doubled. The additional bonus is that this way you ensure that your partner becomes declarer!
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 4
♥ K J 10 8 5 4
♦ K 10 6
♣ 9 5 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
1 ♣ |
| 2 ♥ |
Pass |
Pass |
Dbl. |
| Pass |
Pass |
Rdbl. |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
April 17th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 2 Comments
Our ship of state, which recent storms have threatened to destroy, has come safely to harbor at last.
Sophocles
| N |
North |
| Both |
♠ K 9 5
♥ K Q 6
♦ Q J 10 7 3
♣ A 10 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q J 10 6 2
♥ 5 2
♦ K 6 2
♣ 9 4 3 |
♠ 8 4
♥ 10 8 7 4 3
♦ A
♣ J 8 7 5 2 |
| South |
♠ A 7 3
♥ A J 9
♦ 9 8 5 4
♣ K Q 6 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♦ |
Pass |
| 2 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♠Q
You have three plausible actions here. You can overcall one diamond, perhaps planning to double if the opponents agree a suit cheaply. You can double, making sure you find a major-suit fit cheaply, if you have one, and perhaps minimizing the risk for your side, while possibly missing no-trump. Or, my choice, you can overcall one no-trump — the path with the highest risk but largest reward.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K 9 5
♥ K Q 6
♦ Q J 10 7 3
♣ A 10 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
1 ♣ |
| ? |
|
|
|
April 16th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 5 Comments
Laces for a lady; letters for a spy, Watch the wall my darling while the Gentlemen go by!
Rudyard Kipling
| S |
North |
| None |
♠ J 8 7 5 4
♥ 5
♦ J 8 5 4
♣ K 7 6 |
| West |
East |
♠ K 9 2
♥ A 10 7 6 3 2
♦ 7 6
♣ 8 3 |
♠ A 6
♥ J 8
♦ A K 10 9 2
♣ J 5 4 2 |
| South |
♠ Q 10 3
♥ K Q 9 4
♦ Q 3
♣ A Q 10 9 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
2 ♥ |
Pass |
| 2 ♠ |
All pass |
|
|
♦7
Here your partner has doubled for take-out. You can simply bid either minor, but I’d suggest a call of two no-trump to show both minors. Since you did not bid two no-trump over two hearts, this should not be read as natural. The question is whether you should try for game by raising the Sminor selected by partner. You have just enough to do that if you believe partner has promised extras.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ 10 2
♥ 9 5
♦ Q 6 5 3
♣ A 10 7 5 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♥ |
Dbl. |
2 ♥ |
| Pass |
Pass |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
April 15th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Sunday, April 1st, 2018
|
Please explain to a complete beginner why we are supposed to lead fourth highest from long suits. How does it gain, and what inferences can we draw from the small cards?
Gone to Grass, Union City, Tenn.
The answer comes in two parts, one of which is the rule of 11, which I’ll deal with in response to another letter later this month. You can often infer partner’s precise length in the suit led. For example: If he leads the two, he cannot have five cards (or the two would not be fourth highest). Similarly, if he leads the three and you can see the two, the same logic applies. If you cannot see the two, your partner may have led from three, four or five cards.
I recently led a king from K-Q-7-2 against a suit contract, and dummy had jack-third. My partner took forever to contribute the two, and my king held the trick. Can you tell me my rights and obligations in this situation in regard to continuing the suit?
Truthful James, Sunbury, Pa.
When partner breaks tempo, you must try to ignore it and make the bid or play that you would have done without that unauthorized information. Here that might mean shifting to the logical suit, but at the same time, you are not required to “stop playing bridge.” When your own hand and common sense tell you that it is right to continue the suit (as it might do here, since if declarer had the ace, he would definitely have taken it), you may do so.
When holding ♠ K-9-4-3, ♥ J-8-7, ♦ Q-10-7-4, ♣ A-6, I’ve been taught that if my partner opens one spade and the next hand doubles, it is correct to jump to two no-trump, suggesting a limit raise or better in spades. When I did so, I was greeted by a jump to four hearts by my partner. What should this mean — and what should I do at my next turn?
Tony the Tortoise, Marco Island, Fla.
When a new suit would be forcing, as here, a jump is known as a splinter; it shows shortage and is implicitly a slam try. With no wasted values in hearts, you have just enough for a cue-bid of five clubs. One slam try is clearly enough in this case; you will let your partner take over from here.
|
How much do you need to double a strong no-trump? Is any hand at the top of the range of the no-trump opener good enough, or do you need a long suit? Recently, I held ♠ K-J-2, ♥ A-Q-2, ♦ K-Q-4, ♣ Q-10-3-2, and doubled a no-trump, but despite partner having the club king, we could not set it.
Dumpster Dan, White Plains, N.Y.
Do not let the result on one deal change a sensible policy. While many these days do not play penalty doubles here, there is nothing wrong with your approach. If you have a respectable lead and a prime 16- or 17-count, do not hesitate to double. If they aren’t making their contract from time to time, you may not be doubling enough.
We play a strong no-trump and transfers. What method would you suggest we use when a Jacoby transfer call is doubled by the next hand?
Trumping Voluntary, Midland, Mich.
Let’s keep it simple, though I imagine more complex meanings can be assigned to the calls. Pass shows two trumps; over this, partner’s redouble is a re-transfer, with the auction continuing as it would have without intervention. Any other action by responder is less than invitational but suggesting extra shape, to help in the competitive auctions. Completing the transfer shows three trumps; other calls show values in the bid suit with a good fit for partner.
|
April 14th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 5 Comments
Truth gains more even by the errors of one who, with due study and preparation, thinks for himself, than by the true opinions of those who only hold them because they do not suffer themselves to think.
John Stuart Mill
| S |
North |
| E-W |
♠ A 10 7 4
♥ 6 3
♦ K 6 5
♣ A K 10 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ 6 3
♥ Q J 10 8 4
♦ Q J 9 2
♣ 6 3 |
♠ Q 9 8 5 2
♥ A 7 5
♦ 8
♣ Q J 9 2 |
| South |
♠ K J
♥ K 9 2
♦ A 10 7 4 3
♣ 8 7 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♦ |
1 ♥ |
Dbl. |
2 ♦* |
| Pass |
2 ♥ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| 2 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
*Heart support
♥Q
Should you raise to two spades here? Had your RHO passed, you would surely have left your partner in one spade, but in competition, a simple raise here does not guarantee great extras. It suggests either real shape suitability or decent extras with four spades. This hand just about qualifies by virtue of the nice controls.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A 10 7 4
♥ 6 3
♦ K 6 5
♣ A K 10 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
1 ♥ |
| Dbl. |
Pass |
1 ♠ |
2 ♥ |
| ? |
|
|
|
|
All the deals this week come from last year’s Gold Coast tournament in Brisbane, Australia. Our first deal features a great rarity, where a director call cost 25 IMPs. Cometh the hour, cometh the hand …
Good news: You are in a grand slam. Bad news: They lead an ace in the suit where you have a singleton. Good news: The lead is out of turn! Do you call the director or accept the lead?
Before I give you the denouement, when Molly O’Donohue and Philip Thompson were North-South, they also bid to the delicate grand slam, but in clubs, on the auction shown.
Maybe West should have known not to lead spades — but surely the diamond ace was never going to get away! Be that as it may, while a heart lead might have been the killer for one side or the other, a diamond was led, and O’Donohue wrapped up 13 tricks.
Back to our director call, where our players are veiled in the concealing gauze of anonymity that only a willfully forgetful tournament director can provide. He was summoned to another table where (on an auction similar to the one shown) it was North at the helm in seven diamonds, after East had overcalled one spade. However, West led the spade king out of turn.
North was given his options and, rejecting Goldwater’s Rule (“If they don’t know whose lead it is, they are probably leading the wrong thing”), triumphantly banned the spade lead. So East led the heart ace and continued the suit, to cash out for down two.