Aces on Bridge — Daily Columns

The Aces on Bridge: Tuesday, March 27th, 2018

The poet must become more comprehensive, more allusive, more indirect, in order to force, to dislocate if necessary, language into its meaning.

T.S. Eliot


S North
Both ♠ J 7 4 2
 8 5
 K J 10 9
♣ A Q 3
West East
♠ 6
 Q J 10 7
 7 6 5 2
♣ J 10 9 6
♠ 8 5
 A K 9 2
 A Q 4
♣ 8 7 5 2
South
♠ A K Q 10 9 3
 6 4 3
 8 3
♣ K 4
South West North East
1 ♠ Pass 3 ♠ Pass
4 ♠ All pass    

Q

This is another deal from Kit Woolsey’s excellent new book, “The Language of Bridge.”

As East, you see your partner lead the heart queen; how do you get him to do the right thing after that?

You know the correct defense is for partner to lead a diamond through dummy so that the defense can take their four red-suit tricks, assuming declarer has at least two cards in each red suit — if he doesn’t, you surely have no chance to set the game.

The problem is that a club shift may look more attractive to partner than a diamond shift. So you need to help partner with suit-preference signals.

The answer is to win the heart ace at trick one and return the heart nine. Partner will know that you have the heart king when declarer doesn’t win the second trick, and he will also know that you clearly want him to shift to a minor. Since you had the choice between the heart ace and the heart king at trick one, the combination of your play of the heart ace plus the nine should be suit preference for the higher suit, diamonds. As you can see, the diamond shift is necessary if declarer has the club king and is 2-2 in the minors.

Had you wanted a club shift (switch the diamond queen and club king), you would have taken the heart king at trick one and returned the heart two, again using suit preference to distinguish between the two minors.


I might not open this hand in first or second seat, but in third seat I would open one diamond and try to get my best suit into play. I see no reason to be ashamed of my values, and anytime I have spades, I always feel like I have to contribute my two cents’ worth.

BID WITH THE ACES

♠ J 7 4 2
 8 5
 K J 10 9
♣ A Q 3
South West North East
    Pass Pass
?      

For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog.
Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2018. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Monday, March 26th, 2018

However entrancing it is to wander unchecked through a garden of bright images, are we not enticing your mind from another subject of almost equal importance?

Ernest Bramah


S North
Both ♠ K Q 9
 8 6 2
 6
♣ A K Q 7 6 5
West East
♠ 7 6 3
 K J 9 4 3
 K J 8 5
♣ 4
♠ —
 10 7 5
 9 7 4 3 2
♣ J 10 9 8 3
South
♠ A J 10 8 5 4 2
 A Q
 A Q 10
♣ 2
South West North East
1 ♠ Pass 2 ♣ Pass
2 ♠ Pass 4 Pass
4 Pass 5 ♣ Pass
7 ♠ All pass    

♠7

It never ceases to amaze me that declarers so often rush the play in a grand slam. After all, if a grand slam isn’t worth thinking about for a few extra seconds, what contract will you consider worthy of reflection?

In today’s deal, an efficient bidding sequence led to seven spades, and West led a trump. Declarer reasoned that as long as clubs broke no worse than 4-2, he was home free. So he took the trump lead in dummy, played a diamond to the ace and ruffed a diamond on board. A heart to the ace was followed by the ruff of declarer’s last diamond with dummy’s final trump. Then came the club ace for a heart discard, which passed off peacefully, but when he continued with the club king, on which he threw the heart queen, West unkindly ruffed.

What South had not noticed was that he could have coped with the 5-1 club break. Although it is not strictly a dummy reversal, if declarer had used dummy’s high trumps for the purposes of drawing trumps and use South’s high trumps for ruffing, he could have found his way to 13 tricks without any real problem.

Win the trump lead in dummy and ruff a club high. Play a spade to dummy and ruff a second club high. A third spade to the table draws the last trump, and now the clubs are established, allowing all of South’s red-suit losers to be discarded. He ends up with four clubs, two aces and seven trump tricks.


The question is whether we need to lead diamonds to set up the suit before declarer gets rid of his losers in that suit, or whether now is the time to lead a top spade, since it might be our last chance. Even a trump lead might be right if clubs aren’t running. I’d go for a diamond, but without much confidence in my choice.

LEAD WITH THE ACES

♠ Q J 6
 9 8 2
 6 5 4
♣ Q 10 6 3
South West North East
Pass 1 ♣ 1 1
Pass 2 ♣ Pass 2
Pass 3 All pass  

For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog.
Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2018. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Sunday, March 25th, 2018

You recently ran a bidding problem where responder had replied one spade to one diamond with ace-fourth of spades, and had heard his partner raise him. You suggested offering a choice of games in case partner had only three spades; but with just three spades here, wouldn’t opener rebid at no-trump, expecting the fit to come to light after a New Minor Forcing-type sequence?

Ray of Sunshine, Pueblo, Colo.

My style isn’t necessarily U.S. mainstream standard when it comes to opener raising with three trumps. For example, a 3-2-5-3 or 3-3-5-2 pattern with a small doubleton looks like a raise of one spade to two spades to me whenever your trumps are better than Q-10-x. Three moderate trumps plus a ruffing value equals a raise.

Holding ♠ J-2,  A-7-6,  A-Q-8-3, ♣ K-9-4-2, would you open one diamond or one club? After a onespade overcall and a negative double from your partner, what would you do? My partner told me that opening one diamond and rebidding two clubs guarantees at least nine cards in the minors. Is this true — and if so, why?

Pokemon, Richmond, Va.

I like to open good suits if I can, so I would open one diamond. Then I would rebid two clubs just as you did. If there had been no opposition bidding and my partner had responded in a major, I would bid one no-trump without much of a qualm.

It seems that modern experts have changed the requirements for opening no-trump bids, especially the two no-trump opening bid showing 20-22. How do you personally deal with all the balanced ranges with a strong hand? My reasoning is that with most of the high cards in one hand, the hand won’t play as well as when the high cards are split between the two hands. So I’d prefer to downgrade my 20-HCP hands.

Frere Jacques, Newark, Calif.

Working backward, I don’t want to drive to game with fewer than 25 points. That means with 20-24 (in other words, a 5-point range), we go through a direct or indirect two no-trump call. Working back one more step, I think that means 22 goes up or down as you see fit. So the ranges are really 20 to a weak 22, a strong 22 to 24, and a strong 24 to 26 for opening two no-trump, opening two clubs and then rebidding no-trump, and jumping in no-trump, respectively.

Holding ♠ A-J-7-3-2,  9,  Q-J-7-4, ♣ Q-10-4, would you overcall two spades over one no-trump in balancing seat? Would the vulnerability matter, and would you be affected by whether you were a passed hand?

Baby Back Ribs, Kingston, Ontario

There is much to be said for being able to show a two-suited hand here. Either way, though, you must come in to show spades. Yes, it might end in disaster, but that should not stop you from competing over one no-trump at the slightest opportunity, especially when you know partner is sure to find the wrong lead if you don’t help him.

What advice would you give me as a newbie to duplicate bridge in terms of counting the hand? Should I try on every hand, or just when I think it important?

Learning Curve, Huntsville, Ala.

As declarer, always count trumps. (Add up yours and dummy’s to tell you how many the opponents have, then just focus on that number.) As defender, work out from the auction how many points you expect declarer to have (or if you can’t do that, try to make the calculation for your partner’s hand). For side suits, start small; focus on the one suit you regard as critical and work your way up from there.


For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog.
Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2018. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Saturday, March 24th, 2018

The worst moment for the atheist is when he is really thankful and has nobody to thank.

Dante Gabriel Rossetti


W North
None ♠ A Q J 3
 3 2
 9 7
♣ A K 8 6 2
West East
♠ K 7 5
 K Q J 6 5 4
 A Q
♣ 10 5
♠ 8 4
 10 9 8 7
 6 4 3
♣ Q J 9 7
South
♠ 10 9 6 2
 A
 K J 10 8 5 2
♣ 4 3
South West North East
  1 Dbl. 3
3 ♠ 4 4 ♠ All pass
       

K

Today’s deal produced a bizarre flat board in a teams game where both declarers played four spades. I’m fairly confident there were two rather relieved Souths.

In each room, West led the heart king, won by declarer’s ace. The first South ran the spade 10, which held the trick. Next came a spade to the queen and the ace, East pitching a heart. South now ran the diamond nine, and West won his queen and played the heart king. South ruffed this trick and tried to bring in the club suit, hoping for a 3-3 break. When his second chance failed, declarer had only eight tricks. In retrospect South was kicking himself; all he had to do was to discard on the heart king, and he would have had a sure route to 10 tricks.

In the other room, the lead and play to the first four tricks were identical. But at that table, West was a very tricky customer. When declarer passed the diamond nine, East gave count, and West realized that South was either 6-2 or 4-4 in the minors. Since he had no realistic chance to set the game in the second case, West decided to give declarer an additional losing option by winning the diamond ace at his first turn!

When West returned a heart, declarer did not see any danger; he ruffed in hand, crossed to a top club, then finessed in diamonds and went down the same humiliating two tricks as had happened in the other room.


This looks like an easy problem, but it may have hidden depths. A simple bid of one spade shows four spades (a three-card suit is possible, but unlikely) but is most consistent with a balanced 12-14, and this hand is surely too strong for that. I would bid two spades, intending to show some extras. Even a call of three spades is not absurd.

BID WITH THE ACES

♠ A Q J 3
 3 2
 9 7
♣ A K 8 6 2
South West North East
1 ♣ 1 Dbl. Pass
?      

For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog.
Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2018. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Friday, March 23rd, 2018

Life is the game that must be played.

Edwin Arlington Robinson


E North
E-W ♠ 10 7 3
 A K 8 7
 K 7
♣ A Q 5 3
West East
♠ 5
 J 10 4 3 2
 10 8 6 4 2
♣ 7 4
♠ K Q J 9 8 6
 5
 9 5 3
♣ 9 6 2
South
♠ A 4 2
 Q 9 6
 A Q J
♣ K J 10 8
South West North East
      2 ♠
2 NT Pass 4 NT Pass
5 NT* Pass 6 NT All pass
       

*Pick a slam

♠5

When South heard his partner invite slam, his call of five no-trump was intended to offer a choice of slams. Even at matchpoint pairs, maybe North should have bid six clubs to look for a 4-4 minor-suit fit. That contract would be easy to bring home today, but North was worried that facing king-jack-third or king-queen-third of spades, six clubs would go down on a spade ruff, so the inferior slam was reached.

After a spade lead to East’s jack, South had to recover from his partner’s indelicate bidding. He ducked the spade lead and won the next, then played three rounds of clubs, leaving himself an entry to his hand in that suit. Next came the three top diamonds, and when East followed to all six of those leads, that player was marked with a singleton heart.

So South cashed the heart queen and led the nine from hand. When West followed small (knowing if he covered that declarer would have crossed back to hand by leading to his club winner, then taken the heart finesse on the third round), South let the nine run and claimed his contract.

For the record, even if the count had not produced such a definitive answer (say, if East appeared to have a doubleton heart), it would be right to lead the nine to the king, then cross back to the heart queen and finesse if East had produced the jack or 10 on the second round of the suit.


Your extra shape suggests you should play game here. You can make a good case for playing hearts rather than no-trump, since almost no matter what hand partner has, you might find ten tricks in hearts easier than nine in no-trump. If you believe that, and I do, then transfer into four hearts by whatever method your partnership uses, rather than transferring to hearts and bidding three no-trump.

BID WITH THE ACES

♠ 5
 J 10 4 3 2
 10 8 6 4 2
♣ 7 4
South West North East
    2 ♣ Pass
2 Pass 2 NT Pass
?      

For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog.
Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2018. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Thursday, March 22nd, 2018

The universe is not hostile, nor yet is it friendly. It is simply indifferent.

Revenred John H. Holmes


S North
E-W ♠ Q 9 8 4 3
 A 7
 K 3
♣ K 4 3 2
West East
♠ A 10 2
 K Q J 8 3
 Q 10 6 5
♣ 8
♠ K J 7 5
 10 9 4 2
 9 2
♣ 9 7 5
South
♠ 6
 6 5
 A J 8 7 4
♣ A Q J 10 6
South West North East
1 1 1 ♠ Pass
2 ♣ Pass 2 Pass
3 ♣ Pass 5 ♣ All pass
       

K

Today’s deal shows a technique of declarer play that everyone should have at their disposal.

When the heart king is led against five clubs, South wins the trick and plans how to develop diamonds to maximum efficiency.

Declarer sees that he must establish the suit without losing out to a ruff or over-ruff. If the adverse diamonds split 3-3, one ruff will establish the suit, and it will be smooth sailing. The major worry is a diamond split of 4-2 or worse, with possible over-ruffs of dummy to contend with. The first issue is how many rounds of trumps to draw. Since the likelihood on this auction that anyone has one diamond and two or fewer trumps is nonexistent, it seems wise to go after diamonds relatively early.

Happily, declarer can play the diamonds so as to need only one ruff in dummy, allowing him to negotiate any 4-2 split. The first move is to lead a low trump, won by South, to be sure that the trumps do not split 4-0. Declarer then cashes the diamond king and ace, and leads a third round of the suit. If West discards or ruffs in, the cross-ruff is assured. If West produces the queen, South can ruff high and draw trumps, but when West follows with the diamond 10, it is essential today to discard the losing heart from dummy.

As the cards lie, West can do no better than return a heart; declarer ruffs low in dummy, gives up a spade, then ruffs the fourth diamond high in dummy, and claims the rest.


This hand warrants a sensible response of one spade to the take-out double. Your plan would be to compete to two hearts if the opponents bid to two clubs or two diamonds. You do not have a strong hand, but you have just enough to feel comfortable playing a 4-4 major suit at the two-level. You bid spades first so as to get the two suits in efficiently.

BID WITH THE ACES

♠ K J 7 5
 10 9 4 2
 9 2
♣ 9 7 5
South West North East
  1 Dbl. Pass
?      

For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog.
Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2018. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Wednesday, March 21st, 2018

If ‘pro’ is the opposite of ‘con,’ is ‘progress’ the opposite of ‘congress’?

Gallagher


W North
E-W ♠ A 10 6 2
 10 2
 K Q J 10 9 5 2
♣ —
West East
♠ Q 8 7 5
 K 8 4 3
 6
♣ K J 7 2
♠ 4
 A J 9 5
 8 4 3
♣ A Q 8 5 4
South
♠ K J 9 3
 Q 7 6
 A 7
♣ 10 9 6 3
South West North East
  Pass 1 Pass
1 ♠ Pass 3 ♠ Pass
4 ♠ All pass    

3

Today’s hand came up in the second International Olympic Committee Grand Prix, which was held in the Olympic Museum in Lausanne, Switzerland, in 1999.

Contradictory as it may sound, it may become necessary to finesse for the trump queen in both directions in order to retain control. In certain circles this is known as the Anne Gallagher finesse.

Try the play as South, declarer in four spades, on the lead of a small heart to the ace, followed by the return of the jack, which holds the trick. Now comes yet another heart. You ruff in dummy, of course, but what next?

If you play the ace and king of spades, the 4-1 break means that you lose control — you are unable to complete the drawing of trumps without being forced. One declarer cashed the trump ace, and when he played a trump to the jack, West thoughtfully let it hold. The end result was down three, since West could now kill the diamond suit.

Instead, at trick four try a small trump from dummy and finesse the nine or jack. Should West win, you are in control on any return. On a club or heart return, you can safely trump in dummy, cash the spade ace, then enter hand with the diamond ace to draw the remaining trumps before running the diamonds.

Should West not take his spade queen, you must find the counterintuitive move of finessing in trumps the other way. When the 10 holds, cash the ace, enter hand with the diamond ace, draw the last trump and run the diamonds, for 11 tricks.


My suggestion here is certainly not without risk, but if you want to come back into this auction, you can double two spades to suggest a hand like this. Since the auction is still live (in that West could have a decent hand), your double should show an opening bid short in spades. A little pushy, but faint heart never won fair lady.

BID WITH THE ACES

♠ 4
 A J 9 5
 8 4 3
♣ A Q 8 5 4
South West North East
  Pass Pass 1
Pass 1 ♠ Pass 2 ♠
?      

For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog.
Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2018. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Tuesday, March 20th, 2018

All true believers shall break their eggs at the convenient end: and which is the convenient end, seems, to my humble opinion, to be left to every man’s conscience.

Jonathan Swift


S North
Both ♠ 9 5
 A 5 3 2
 A 8 6 4
♣ A 6 4
West East
♠ K 10 7 4 2
 8 7 4
 K J 9
♣ 7 2
♠ Q J 3
 10 9 6
 10 7 2
♣ K 8 5 3
South
♠ A 8 6
 K Q J
 Q 5 3
♣ Q J 10 9
South West North East
1 NT Pass 2 ♣ Pass
2 Pass 3 NT All pass
       

♠4

Today’s deal comes from “The Language of Bridge” by Kit Woolsey. The author framed it as a defensive problem: I’m going to give you a slightly different take on the deal by asking you just to look at the East cards, not the West cards, as Woolsey posed.

After an abortive Stayman sequence, your partner leads a fourth-highest spade four. You win the spade jack as declarer plays the spade six. Under your spade queen, declarer plays the spade eight, partner the seven. What should you do, and why?

Clearly declarer started with precisely A-8-6 of spades, since he denied a four-card major. If your partner had started with ace-king-fifth of spades, he would have overtaken the queen and cashed out the spades.

Also, if he had wanted spades continued, he would have seized control by overtaking the second spade and leading a third spade. When he didn’t do this, he must have wanted to leave you on lead to do something else.

Since we know West began with K-10-7-4-2, he had three small spades to choose from at trick two. Playing the seven, the middle spade out of these three spots, should call for the middle suit, diamonds. Your partner must have three decent diamonds and be hoping you can lead the suit, and that you have the 10 or that declarer has only two diamonds.

If you shift to a diamond now, then when you get back on lead with the club king, another diamond play will give the defense five tricks.


You have enough to force to game, but it seems premature to drive to four hearts, since you might miss slam or end up playing a 4-3 fit when three no-trump is a better game. Start with a two-diamond cue-bid and see if partner produces a heart suit or a diamond stopper.

BID WITH THE ACES

♠ 9 5
 A 5 3 2
 A 8 6 4
♣ A 6 4
South West North East
  1 Dbl. Pass
?      

For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog.
Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2018. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Monday, March 19th, 2018

Tempt not the stars, young man; thou canst not play with the severity of fate.

John Ford


S North
Both ♠ K J 4
 A 6 4
 K 7 5 4
♣ K 7 3
West East
♠ 10 6 2
 K 10
 J 9 8 3
♣ J 9 6 4
♠ Q 9 8 3
 Q 9 7 5
 Q 10
♣ 10 8 5
South
♠ A 7 5
 J 8 3 2
 A 6 2
♣ A Q 2
South West North East
1 NT Pass 3 NT All pass
       

3

Today’s deal saw a relatively experienced declarer missing his best chance in three no-trump. He ducked the opening diamond lead and won the next diamond in hand, then took a spade finesse and found that when East won and returned the suit, the defenders could get spades going before he could find a ninth trick.

Ducking the first diamond looks right, since there is no shift you fear. But next win the diamond king and lead a low heart from dummy, planning to duck if East follows low in unconcerned fashion. West will win his 10 and clear diamonds; you win in hand and cross to the heart ace to lead a heart toward your hand.

The advantage of playing on hearts before spades is that this line lets you fall back on the spade finesse as a last resort; the defenders surely cannot take more than two tricks in either red suit. However there are plenty of lies of the cards where an unsuccessful spade finesse will set up an extra winner for the defense, which prevents you from playing effectively on the red suits.

One of the most important strategies as declarer is to take your chances in the right order. If the spade finesse is working at the start of the hand, it will still be working at the end of the hand. But when you have to duck tricks in side suits in order to test them to maximum efficiency, you generally need to make those plays earlier rather than later.


It definitely feels right to lead spades, not diamonds. With a five-card suit and respectable spot cards, you need far less from your partner in the way of spade length and honors to get tricks going for the defense. (Plus, you have a sure entry to get you in.)

LEAD WITH THE ACES

♠ Q 9 5 4 3
 9 5
 A 5 3 2
♣ 6 4
South West North East
  1 ♣ Pass 1 ♠
Pass 2 ♣ Pass 3 NT
All pass      

For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog.
Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2018. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Sunday, March 18th, 2018

My partner and I play Bergen raises. Would you still use Bergen facing a third- or fourth-hand opener, or would you prefer to play Drury?

SuperMac, Doylestown, Pa.

My natural dislike of Bergen is as nothing to my hatred of the idea of playing it by a passed hand. Drury is fine, though not in competition, please, and I prefer to use fit-jumps by passed hands whether in competition or not. A jump raise by a passed hand should therefore be mixed values — four trumps and a singleton or five trumps with weaker values than a Drury hand.

Playing pairs with both sides vulnerable, I held in fourth seat: ♠ Q-9-4-2,  K-7-6,  9-7, ♣ A-10-6-4. I heard three clubs opened on my left and a double from partner. Would you pass, bid three no-trump or bid some number of spades?

So Many Choices, Eau Claire, Wis.

I do not have a sensible answer for you here! I suspect game our way has no better than a 50 percent chance, and that we will defeat three clubs more often than not. Given the vulnerability, I would pass and cross my fingers. Give me the club eight instead of the four, and I’m a little happier with that call. If I were to bid game, I’d have a sneaking admiration for a call of three no-trump.

I am having trouble distinguishing between responsive and penalty doubles facing a take-out double from my partner and a call on my right. What is the definition of a responsive double? How does it work if the opponents open one of a suit (doubled by my partner), and my RHO bids a new suit?

Whacked Out, Princeton, N.J.

No matter what level the opponents open at, a responsive double — which is for take-out, suggesting a relatively balanced hand — only applies to the double of an agreed suit. A responsive double suggests a balanced hand with both unbid majors if they bid and raise a minor — though you may have just spades and a good hand. A double of a bid and raised heart suit tends to deny spades — you would bid them if you had them. Double of a new suit by RHO is penalty.

Is there a defined rule about how to penalize slow play at the club? If a director takes away a board, what is the fair way to handle such deals when only one side wants to play that board at the end of the game?

Patient Grizelda, Fredericksburg, Va.

Most clubs hate to assign penalties to players for any reason. I’d expect an average for both sides for an unplayed deal, unless one side was blameless for the delay and is willing to play the deal, while the other side is not. In that case, the non-offenders might get average-plus. Continued slow play should be punished by an average minus on an unplayed deal; but I wouldn’t hold my breath for that to happen.

I have read your recent strictures on overcalling with weak five-card suits at the two-level. A related question is whether to come in when a passed hand or between bidding opponents. How much should this be about bidding for the lead? Would you come in with two clubs after hearing one diamond to your right and one spade to your left with ♠ J-8-2,  3-2,  Q-5-3, ♣ A-Q-10-9-4?

Extenuating Circumstances, Palm Springs, Calif.

You are right that I’m strongly opposed to bidding at the two-level with a poor suit. So it may appear illogical that I would act when non-vulnerable as a passed hand, and maybe even when vulnerable with the hand you quote. Getting “Center Hand Opponent” off to the correct lead and coming in cheaply seem like reasonable ideas, especially when your partner is unlikely to take you too seriously.


For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog.
Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2018. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].