June 14th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 15 Comments
It is impossible to live without failing at something, unless you live so cautiously that you might as well not have lived at all — in which case, you fail by default.
J.K. Rowling
| S |
North |
| Both |
♠ Q 10
♥ 8 6
♦ K 9 7 6 2
♣ A 8 7 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ K 2
♥ K J 10 5 4
♦ Q 10 5
♣ J 9 3 |
♠ 8 7 6 4
♥ Q 9 7 3 2
♦ J 8 3
♣ Q |
| South |
♠ A J 9 5 3
♥ A
♦ A 4
♣ K 10 6 5 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♠ |
2 ♥ |
2 ♠ |
4 ♥ |
| 4 ♠ |
All pass |
|
|
♥J
It may be a little bit of a push, but you are just about worth a jump to three diamonds. You have high offense, and it is easy to imagine coming to nine tricks in no-trump or 11 in a minor if partner has any extras in shape or high cards. Make the diamond king the queen, and two diamonds would certainly be enough.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 10
♥ 8 6
♦ K 9 7 6 2
♣ A 8 7 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♥ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
June 13th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 15 Comments
Fortunate people seldom mend their ways, for when good luck crowns their misdeeds with success, they think it is because they are right.
François de la Rochefoucauld
| S |
North |
| E-W |
♠ K Q 7
♥ 8 6 3
♦ A K 5 3
♣ K J 7 |
| West |
East |
♠ J 9 8 5 2
♥ 10 9
♦ J 9 8 4
♣ 8 3 |
♠ 10
♥ Q J 7 5 4
♦ 10 2
♣ 9 6 5 4 2 |
| South |
♠ A 6 4 3
♥ A K 2
♦ Q 7 6
♣ A Q 10 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♣ |
Pass |
1 ♦ |
Pass |
| 2 NT |
Pass |
6 NT |
All pass |
♥10
You are going to have to guess whether to play part-score or game — and which game to head for. My instincts tell me hearts must play better than no-trump, so I would transfer to hearts and play game, either using a Texas transfer or transferring and raising to game, depending on what methods are available.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 10
♥ Q J 7 5 4
♦ 10 2
♣ 9 6 5 4 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
2 NT |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
June 12th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 9 Comments
To do a great and important work, two things are necessary: a definite plan, and not quite enough time.
Anonymous
| S |
North |
| N-S |
♠ A Q 9 4
♥ A 6 5
♦ K 9 3
♣ 9 3 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ —
♥ K Q J 9 2
♦ 7 6 2
♣ Q 10 7 6 4 |
♠ 10 8 7 2
♥ 10 8 7 4
♦ 10 5 4
♣ J 8 |
| South |
♠ K J 6 5 3
♥ 3
♦ A Q J 8
♣ A K 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♠ |
2 ♠ |
3 ♥* |
Pass |
| 4 NT |
Pass |
5 ♠** |
Pass |
| 5 NT |
Pass |
6 ♦ |
Pass |
| 7 ♦ |
Pass |
7 ♠ |
All pass |
*Limit raise or better in spades
**Two key-cards and the trump queen
♥K
There is a simple choice between bidding one spade and one no-trump here. In favor of bidding the four-card major is that you might miss the fit if you don’t. Against it is that when partner responds one diamond, he probably does not have a major suit unless he has enough values to bid again over one no-trump. I would prefer to have real clubs before introducing spades in this auction.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A Q 9 4
♥ A 6 5
♦ K 9 3
♣ 9 3 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♣ |
Pass |
1 ♦ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
June 11th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
You touch on a disheartening truth. People never want to be told anything they do not believe already.
James Branch Cabell
| E |
North |
| None |
♠ 6 4 2
♥ K 8 7
♦ K J 6
♣ 8 6 5 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ K 9 8 5 3
♥ 3 2
♦ 10 9 8 3
♣ 10 9 |
♠ Q J 10
♥ Q 6 4
♦ A Q 7 5
♣ Q 7 3 |
| South |
♠ A 7
♥ A J 10 9 5
♦ 4 2
♣ A K J 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
1 ♦ |
| 1 ♥ |
1 ♠ |
2 ♥ |
Dbl. |
| 4 ♥ |
All pass |
|
|
♦10
Partner did not double the two-spade cue-bid, so there is an argument that he is not loaded for bear in spades. I would lead a heart, since dummy surely doesn’t have length there, or he might have bid two hearts rather than two spades, and declarer didn’t make a negative double. Thus, you have a decent chance to find your partner with heart length or an honor.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ 3
♥ A J 7 6 4
♦ 9 8 3
♣ J 10 6 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♣ |
1 ♠ |
2 ♦ |
| Pass |
2 ♠ |
Pass |
2 NT |
| Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
|
June 10th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 5 Comments
|
In duplicate bridge, when should third hand (the partner of the opening leader) break the rule of third hand high? Is there a simple set of guidelines to follow?
Gasoline Alley, Grand Forks, N.D.
You must try to avoid finessing against partner unnecessarily, so when dummy has nothing, third hand must almost always play high to keep declarer from scoring a cheap trick. But say, for example, in a suit contract, dummy has J-7-2 in the suit partner leads and you have K-9-3 or Q-9-3. When dummy plays a small card, you should surely follow with the nine (which is the right play whenever partner has the 10). Of course, if your holding were Q-10-2 or K-10-2, you’d insert the 10 without needing to think about it.
I was dealt ♠ K-10-9-7-2 , ♥ K-J-5-3, ♦ A-8, ♣ 9-4, and my partner opened one diamond, which was doubled on my right. I redoubled to show 10 HCP, thinking that I could bid my suits later on, but my LHO jumped to three clubs, meaning it as pre-emptive. I could still bid my spades, but we never got hearts into play. What are your thoughts on our bidding?
Quick Fix, Syracuse, N.Y.
It is a good rule to bid out a one-suiter after a double, regardless of strength. Only redouble when you can handle all likely actions by your LHO in response to the double. Having said that, I do have sympathy with redoubling here, since the opponents tend to bid the majors after this start.
In a suit contract, what factors should I consider when faced with the choice of leading the top of a small doubleton or leading from four to an honor?
Just the Fax, Bay City, Mich.
I tend to be slightly more in favor than most of leading from the doubleton here, regardless of my trump holding, if I think passive defense is called for. Four to an unsupported honor is less appealing, but give me a suit headed by a two-card sequence, and I tend to go for that instead. Of course, a ruff may be counter-effective if I surrender a trump trick, or trump control, in the process.
|
I was in third seat when my partner opened one heart. The next hand bid two hearts to show spades and a minor, and I had ♠ K-5-4, ♥ A-K-10-9-2, ♦ 8-5, ♣ 10-8-3. What were my bidding options?
Rocking Rooster, Phoenix, Ariz.
The logic here is that a bid of three hearts is competitive, not a limit raise. This means that you have to use the cue-bid of two spades to show a good hand with hearts. Double by you shows a good hand, typically without real fit, but that wouldn’t be suitable in this case. The real issue is whether you will stay out of game if partner signs off over your cue-bid. I’m on the fence!
My partner explained to me that all jump bids by opener at his second turn are forcing to game. If the bid is a jump-shift, then I can understand it being forcing to game; but if the jump is in a bid suit, I don’t believe that rule applies. Do you? Also, is the jump shift in a new suit forcing for one round or game forcing?
Truly Scrumptious, Shreveport, La.
A jump-shift shows a game force. But as opener, it is important to distinguish such a thing from jump rebids either in your own suit or in support of partner’s suit, neither of which is forcing. Once responder has shown limit-plus values, perhaps by something like a two-level response, these auctions do become forcing. One further caveat: In response to a negative double, jumps in a new suit show extras, but are not forcing. A cue-bid sets up the game force.
|
June 9th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
All things that can be known have number; for it is not possible that without number anything can be either conceived or known.
Philolaus
| S |
North |
| E-W |
♠ 5 3
♥ A Q 7
♦ K 8 6 3
♣ K J 8 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ K Q 10 9 6
♥ J 9 6 4 3
♦ A Q
♣ 2 |
♠ J 8 4 2
♥ 8
♦ 7 5 4
♣ 9 7 6 5 3 |
| South |
♠ A 7
♥ K 10 5 2
♦ J 10 9 2
♣ A Q 10 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♦ |
2 ♦* |
2 ♠ |
3 ♠ |
| Pass |
Pass |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| 3 NT |
All pass |
|
|
*Majors
♠K
When the opponents intervene and you can see the possibility that they will raise their suit, it is a good idea to support your partner, assuming you have the option to do so. Here, I prefer to cue-bid two spades to show a club raise rather than bidding diamonds. The latter would be natural and forcing, but would not promise support.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 5 3
♥ A Q 7
♦ K 8 6 3
♣ K J 8 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♣ |
1 ♠ |
| ? |
|
|
|
June 8th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 3 Comments
I’ve been in office and I’ve been out of office. And if I were to choose, I’d rather be in office.
Jerry Brown
| S |
North |
| N-S |
♠ K 9 7 3
♥ A K 8
♦ K J 10 2
♣ 10 8 |
| West |
East |
♠ 5
♥ J 9 6 4
♦ A Q 9 7 5 3
♣ 5 2 |
♠ Q 10 8 6
♥ 10 5
♦ 8 6
♣ K Q J 7 4 |
| South |
♠ A J 4 2
♥ Q 7 3 2
♦ 4
♣ A 9 6 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♣ |
1 ♦ |
1 ♥* |
Pass |
| 2 ♠ |
Pass |
3 NT |
Pass |
| 4 ♠ |
All pass |
|
|
*Spades
♥6
You may have a dead-minimum hand, but you do have extra shape, and your partner has volunteered a call, so he won’t have a complete bust. Even if you are outgunned on high cards, you may still make a surprising number of tricks, since you have aces, and you may be able to engineer a cross-ruff. So raise to two spades.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A J 4 2
♥ Q 7 3 2
♦ 4
♣ A 9 6 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
1 ♦ |
| Dbl. |
1 ♥ |
1 ♠ |
2 ♦ |
| ? |
|
|
|
June 7th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
Evil communication corrupts good manners. I hope to live to hear that good communication corrects bad manners.
Benjamin Banneker
| E |
North |
| None |
♠ 3
♥ J 5 4 2
♦ A K 7
♣ A Q J 6 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ K 7
♥ 10 9 3
♦ 9 4 3
♣ K 10 9 7 5 |
♠ A 10 9 8 5 4 2
♥ A K
♦ 10 5 2
♣ 8 |
| South |
♠ Q J 6
♥ Q 8 7 6
♦ Q J 8 6
♣ 4 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
1 ♠ |
| Pass |
1 NT |
Dbl |
2 ♠ |
| 3 ♥ |
3 ♠ |
4 ♥ |
All pass |
♠K
Your double of four spades is card-showing, not penalty. Your partner’s four-no-trump call suggests two places to play; and when he corrects five clubs to five diamonds, he is showing the red suits. You should bid five hearts now, to play the longer, if not necessarily stronger, trump suit.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 3
♥ J 5 4 2
♦ A K 7
♣ A Q J 6 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
4 ♠ |
| Dbl. |
Pass |
4 NT |
Pass |
| 5 ♣ |
Pass |
5 ♦ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
June 6th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 2 Comments
If the waiter in the restaurant stumbles and spills a gill of coffee down the back of your neck, he says, ‘For lagniappe, sir,’ and gets you another cup without extra charge.
Mark Twain
| E |
North |
| Both |
♠ 10 8 3 2
♥ Q 8 7
♦ A K 6
♣ A K J |
| West |
East |
♠ Q 7
♥ 6
♦ 9 8 5 3
♣ 10 8 7 5 4 2 |
♠ 6
♥ K J 10 9 5 4
♦ Q J 10 7
♣ Q 9 |
| South |
♠ A K J 9 5 4
♥ A 3 2
♦ 4 2
♣ 6 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
2 ♥ |
| 2 ♠ |
Pass |
3 ♥ |
Pass |
| 3 NT |
Pass |
4 ♣ |
Pass |
| 4 ♥ |
Pass |
5 ♦ |
Pass |
| 5 ♠ |
Pass |
6 ♠ |
All pass |
♥6
You already denied four hearts when you bid two spades over two diamonds. (Yes, you could be 7-4, but in practical terms, you would surely never bypass even a moderate four-card major when in a game force). So you can bid three hearts to temporize and let partner support spades or try for three no-trump.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A K J 9 5 4
♥ A 6 2
♦ 4 2
♣ 6 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
2 ♣ |
2 ♦ |
| 2 ♠ |
Pass |
3 ♦ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
June 5th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
Greed is all right, by the way. I think greed is healthy. You can be greedy and still feel good about yourself.
Ivan Boesky
| S |
North |
| E-W |
♠ A J 5
♥ 9 7
♦ A J 10 8 6 5
♣ 8 6 |
| West |
East |
♠ 10 8 4 2
♥ K 8 3
♦ 3
♣ Q 10 9 4 2 |
♠ K 7 6 3
♥ Q J 10 6 4
♦ K 7 4
♣ 7 |
| South |
♠ Q 9
♥ A 5 2
♦ Q 9 2
♣ A K J 5 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
♠2
Whether or not you think this hand is too good for a two-diamond opener (I could go either way), over your partner’s forcing two-heart call you should bid two spades now. This is natural in principle, suggesting either a four-card suit or a holding like this one.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A J 5
♥ 9 7
♦ A J 10 8 6 5
♣ 8 6 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
Pass |
| 2 ♦ |
Pass |
2 ♥ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
|
When I saw a close variant of this deal from the Common Game in 2017, I thought it had the makings of a good problem. At the table, most North-South pairs played five clubs on a deal where slam seemed highly likely to make. But with neither spades nor clubs behaving, the limit on the hand turned out to be 11 tricks.
However, imagine that North finds a slightly off-center raise to two spades rather than a negative double. This is sensible enough, since a decent hand with Q-10 of spades plus short hearts virtually corresponds to a three-card raise. Can you imagine how the defense would go against four spades?
West leads from his heart sequence. Declarer wins and crosses to the diamond king to run the spade queen to West, who forces declarer with a second heart. Now declarer must be careful not to draw any more trumps. Instead, he plays a club to the ace and a second club. East will probably discard, and declarer will clear the clubs. He can now ruff the next heart in dummy and come to hand in diamonds to draw trumps, then claim the rest. Note that had declarer drawn trumps before playing on clubs, the combination of bad breaks in the minors would sink him, since he runs out of trumps.
Still, I wonder if the defenders might have prevailed by following a more devious line. If West can duck the first trump smoothly, declarer will probably repeat the spade finesse. Now the force in hearts will work, since dummy is out of trumps.