April 10th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 1 Comment
The poet must become more comprehensive, more allusive, more indirect, in order to force, to dislocate if necessary, language into its meaning.
T.S. Eliot
| S |
North |
| Both |
♠ J 7 4 2
♥ 8 5
♦ K J 10 9
♣ A Q 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ 6
♥ Q J 10 7
♦ 7 6 5 2
♣ J 10 9 6 |
♠ 8 5
♥ A K 9 2
♦ A Q 4
♣ 8 7 5 2 |
| South |
♠ A K Q 10 9 3
♥ 6 4 3
♦ 8 3
♣ K 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
3 ♠ |
Pass |
| 4 ♠ |
All pass |
|
|
♥Q
I might not open this hand in first or second seat, but in third seat I would open one diamond and try to get my best suit into play. I see no reason to be ashamed of my values, and anytime I have spades, I always feel like I have to contribute my two cents’ worth.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ J 7 4 2
♥ 8 5
♦ K J 10 9
♣ A Q 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
Pass |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
April 9th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 29 Comments
However entrancing it is to wander unchecked through a garden of bright images, are we not enticing your mind from another subject of almost equal importance?
Ernest Bramah
| S |
North |
| Both |
♠ K Q 9
♥ 8 6 2
♦ 6
♣ A K Q 7 6 5 |
| West |
East |
♠ 7 6 3
♥ K J 9 4 3
♦ K J 8 5
♣ 4 |
♠ —
♥ 10 7 5
♦ 9 7 4 3 2
♣ J 10 9 8 3 |
| South |
♠ A J 10 8 5 4 2
♥ A Q
♦ A Q 10
♣ 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
2 ♣ |
Pass |
| 2 ♠ |
Pass |
4 ♦ |
Pass |
| 4 ♥ |
Pass |
5 ♣ |
Pass |
| 7 ♠ |
All pass |
|
|
♠7
The question is whether we need to lead diamonds to set up the suit before declarer gets rid of his losers in that suit, or whether now is the time to lead a top spade, since it might be our last chance. Even a trump lead might be right if clubs aren’t running. I’d go for a diamond, but without much confidence in my choice.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ Q J 6
♥ 9 8 2
♦ 6 5 4
♣ Q 10 6 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| Pass |
1 ♣ |
1 ♦ |
1 ♥ |
| Pass |
2 ♣ |
Pass |
2 ♥ |
| Pass |
3 ♥ |
All pass |
|
April 8th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 7 Comments
|
You recently ran a bidding problem where responder had replied one spade to one diamond with ace-fourth of spades, and had heard his partner raise him. You suggested offering a choice of games in case partner had only three spades; but with just three spades here, wouldn’t opener rebid at no-trump, expecting the fit to come to light after a New Minor Forcing-type sequence?
Ray of Sunshine, Pueblo, Colo.
My style isn’t necessarily U.S. mainstream standard when it comes to opener raising with three trumps. For example, a 3-2-5-3 or 3-3-5-2 pattern with a small doubleton looks like a raise of one spade to two spades to me whenever your trumps are better than Q-10-x. Three moderate trumps plus a ruffing value equals a raise.
Holding ♠ J-2, ♥ A-7-6, ♦ A-Q-8-3, ♣ K-9-4-2, would you open one diamond or one club? After a onespade overcall and a negative double from your partner, what would you do? My partner told me that opening one diamond and rebidding two clubs guarantees at least nine cards in the minors. Is this true — and if so, why?
Pokemon, Richmond, Va.
I like to open good suits if I can, so I would open one diamond. Then I would rebid two clubs just as you did. If there had been no opposition bidding and my partner had responded in a major, I would bid one no-trump without much of a qualm.
It seems that modern experts have changed the requirements for opening no-trump bids, especially the two no-trump opening bid showing 20-22. How do you personally deal with all the balanced ranges with a strong hand? My reasoning is that with most of the high cards in one hand, the hand won’t play as well as when the high cards are split between the two hands. So I’d prefer to downgrade my 20-HCP hands.
Frere Jacques, Newark, Calif.
Working backward, I don’t want to drive to game with fewer than 25 points. That means with 20-24 (in other words, a 5-point range), we go through a direct or indirect two no-trump call. Working back one more step, I think that means 22 goes up or down as you see fit. So the ranges are really 20 to a weak 22, a strong 22 to 24, and a strong 24 to 26 for opening two no-trump, opening two clubs and then rebidding no-trump, and jumping in no-trump, respectively.
|
Holding ♠ A-J-7-3-2, ♥ 9, ♦ Q-J-7-4, ♣ Q-10-4, would you overcall two spades over one no-trump in balancing seat? Would the vulnerability matter, and would you be affected by whether you were a passed hand?
Baby Back Ribs, Kingston, Ontario
There is much to be said for being able to show a two-suited hand here. Either way, though, you must come in to show spades. Yes, it might end in disaster, but that should not stop you from competing over one no-trump at the slightest opportunity, especially when you know partner is sure to find the wrong lead if you don’t help him.
What advice would you give me as a newbie to duplicate bridge in terms of counting the hand? Should I try on every hand, or just when I think it important?
Learning Curve, Huntsville, Ala.
As declarer, always count trumps. (Add up yours and dummy’s to tell you how many the opponents have, then just focus on that number.) As defender, work out from the auction how many points you expect declarer to have (or if you can’t do that, try to make the calculation for your partner’s hand). For side suits, start small; focus on the one suit you regard as critical and work your way up from there.
|
April 7th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 8 Comments
The worst moment for the atheist is when he is really thankful and has nobody to thank.
Dante Gabriel Rossetti
| W |
North |
| None |
♠ A Q J 3
♥ 3 2
♦ 9 7
♣ A K 8 6 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ K 7 5
♥ K Q J 6 5 4
♦ A Q
♣ 10 5 |
♠ 8 4
♥ 10 9 8 7
♦ 6 4 3
♣ Q J 9 7 |
| South |
♠ 10 9 6 2
♥ A
♦ K J 10 8 5 2
♣ 4 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♥ |
Dbl. |
3 ♥ |
| 3 ♠ |
4 ♥ |
4 ♠ |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♥K
This looks like an easy problem, but it may have hidden depths. A simple bid of one spade shows four spades (a three-card suit is possible, but unlikely) but is most consistent with a balanced 12-14, and this hand is surely too strong for that. I would bid two spades, intending to show some extras. Even a call of three spades is not absurd.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A Q J 3
♥ 3 2
♦ 9 7
♣ A K 8 6 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♣ |
1 ♦ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
April 6th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
Life is the game that must be played.
Edwin Arlington Robinson
| E |
North |
| E-W |
♠ 10 7 3
♥ A K 8 7
♦ K 7
♣ A Q 5 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ 5
♥ J 10 4 3 2
♦ 10 8 6 4 2
♣ 7 4 |
♠ K Q J 9 8 6
♥ 5
♦ 9 5 3
♣ 9 6 2 |
| South |
♠ A 4 2
♥ Q 9 6
♦ A Q J
♣ K J 10 8 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
2 ♠ |
| 2 NT |
Pass |
4 NT |
Pass |
| 5 NT* |
Pass |
6 NT |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
*Pick a slam
♠5
Your extra shape suggests you should play game here. You can make a good case for playing hearts rather than no-trump, since almost no matter what hand partner has, you might find ten tricks in hearts easier than nine in no-trump. If you believe that, and I do, then transfer into four hearts by whatever method your partnership uses, rather than transferring to hearts and bidding three no-trump.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 5
♥ J 10 4 3 2
♦ 10 8 6 4 2
♣ 7 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
2 ♣ |
Pass |
| 2 ♦ |
Pass |
2 NT |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
April 5th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Thursday, March 22nd, 2018
The universe is not hostile, nor yet is it friendly. It is simply indifferent.
Revenred John H. Holmes
| S |
North |
| E-W |
♠ Q 9 8 4 3
♥ A 7
♦ K 3
♣ K 4 3 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ A 10 2
♥ K Q J 8 3
♦ Q 10 6 5
♣ 8 |
♠ K J 7 5
♥ 10 9 4 2
♦ 9 2
♣ 9 7 5 |
| South |
♠ 6
♥ 6 5
♦ A J 8 7 4
♣ A Q J 10 6 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♦ |
1 ♥ |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
| 2 ♣ |
Pass |
2 ♥ |
Pass |
| 3 ♣ |
Pass |
5 ♣ |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♥K
This hand warrants a sensible response of one spade to the take-out double. Your plan would be to compete to two hearts if the opponents bid to two clubs or two diamonds. You do not have a strong hand, but you have just enough to feel comfortable playing a 4-4 major suit at the two-level. You bid spades first so as to get the two suits in efficiently.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K J 7 5
♥ 10 9 4 2
♦ 9 2
♣ 9 7 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♦ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
April 4th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
If ‘pro’ is the opposite of ‘con,’ is ‘progress’ the opposite of ‘congress’?
Gallagher
| W |
North |
| E-W |
♠ A 10 6 2
♥ 10 2
♦ K Q J 10 9 5 2
♣ — |
| West |
East |
♠ Q 8 7 5
♥ K 8 4 3
♦ 6
♣ K J 7 2 |
♠ 4
♥ A J 9 5
♦ 8 4 3
♣ A Q 8 5 4 |
| South |
♠ K J 9 3
♥ Q 7 6
♦ A 7
♣ 10 9 6 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
1 ♦ |
Pass |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
3 ♠ |
Pass |
| 4 ♠ |
All pass |
|
|
♥3
My suggestion here is certainly not without risk, but if you want to come back into this auction, you can double two spades to suggest a hand like this. Since the auction is still live (in that West could have a decent hand), your double should show an opening bid short in spades. A little pushy, but faint heart never won fair lady.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 4
♥ A J 9 5
♦ 8 4 3
♣ A Q 8 5 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
Pass |
1 ♦ |
| Pass |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
2 ♠ |
| ? |
|
|
|
April 3rd, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 12 Comments
All true believers shall break their eggs at the convenient end: and which is the convenient end, seems, to my humble opinion, to be left to every man’s conscience.
Jonathan Swift
| S |
North |
| Both |
♠ 9 5
♥ A 5 3 2
♦ A 8 6 4
♣ A 6 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ K 10 7 4 2
♥ 8 7 4
♦ K J 9
♣ 7 2 |
♠ Q J 3
♥ 10 9 6
♦ 10 7 2
♣ K 8 5 3 |
| South |
♠ A 8 6
♥ K Q J
♦ Q 5 3
♣ Q J 10 9 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
2 ♣ |
Pass |
| 2 ♦ |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♠4
You have enough to force to game, but it seems premature to drive to four hearts, since you might miss slam or end up playing a 4-3 fit when three no-trump is a better game. Start with a two-diamond cue-bid and see if partner produces a heart suit or a diamond stopper.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 9 5
♥ A 5 3 2
♦ A 8 6 4
♣ A 6 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♦ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
April 2nd, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Monday, March 19th, 2018
Tempt not the stars, young man; thou canst not play with the severity of fate.
John Ford
| S |
North |
| Both |
♠ K J 4
♥ A 6 4
♦ K 7 5 4
♣ K 7 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ 10 6 2
♥ K 10
♦ J 9 8 3
♣ J 9 6 4 |
♠ Q 9 8 3
♥ Q 9 7 5
♦ Q 10
♣ 10 8 5 |
| South |
♠ A 7 5
♥ J 8 3 2
♦ A 6 2
♣ A Q 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♦3
It definitely feels right to lead spades, not diamonds. With a five-card suit and respectable spot cards, you need far less from your partner in the way of spade length and honors to get tricks going for the defense. (Plus, you have a sure entry to get you in.)
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 9 5 4 3
♥ 9 5
♦ A 5 3 2
♣ 6 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♣ |
Pass |
1 ♠ |
| Pass |
2 ♣ |
Pass |
3 NT |
| All pass |
|
|
|
April 1st, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
|
My partner and I play Bergen raises. Would you still use Bergen facing a third- or fourth-hand opener, or would you prefer to play Drury?
SuperMac, Doylestown, Pa.
My natural dislike of Bergen is as nothing to my hatred of the idea of playing it by a passed hand. Drury is fine, though not in competition, please, and I prefer to use fit-jumps by passed hands whether in competition or not. A jump raise by a passed hand should therefore be mixed values — four trumps and a singleton or five trumps with weaker values than a Drury hand.
Playing pairs with both sides vulnerable, I held in fourth seat: ♠ Q-9-4-2, ♥ K-7-6, ♦ 9-7, ♣ A-10-6-4. I heard three clubs opened on my left and a double from partner. Would you pass, bid three no-trump or bid some number of spades?
So Many Choices, Eau Claire, Wis.
I do not have a sensible answer for you here! I suspect game our way has no better than a 50 percent chance, and that we will defeat three clubs more often than not. Given the vulnerability, I would pass and cross my fingers. Give me the club eight instead of the four, and I’m a little happier with that call. If I were to bid game, I’d have a sneaking admiration for a call of three no-trump.
I am having trouble distinguishing between responsive and penalty doubles facing a take-out double from my partner and a call on my right. What is the definition of a responsive double? How does it work if the opponents open one of a suit (doubled by my partner), and my RHO bids a new suit?
Whacked Out, Princeton, N.J.
No matter what level the opponents open at, a responsive double — which is for take-out, suggesting a relatively balanced hand — only applies to the double of an agreed suit. A responsive double suggests a balanced hand with both unbid majors if they bid and raise a minor — though you may have just spades and a good hand. A double of a bid and raised heart suit tends to deny spades — you would bid them if you had them. Double of a new suit by RHO is penalty.
|
Is there a defined rule about how to penalize slow play at the club? If a director takes away a board, what is the fair way to handle such deals when only one side wants to play that board at the end of the game?
Patient Grizelda, Fredericksburg, Va.
Most clubs hate to assign penalties to players for any reason. I’d expect an average for both sides for an unplayed deal, unless one side was blameless for the delay and is willing to play the deal, while the other side is not. In that case, the non-offenders might get average-plus. Continued slow play should be punished by an average minus on an unplayed deal; but I wouldn’t hold my breath for that to happen.
I have read your recent strictures on overcalling with weak five-card suits at the two-level. A related question is whether to come in when a passed hand or between bidding opponents. How much should this be about bidding for the lead? Would you come in with two clubs after hearing one diamond to your right and one spade to your left with ♠ J-8-2, ♥ 3-2, ♦ Q-5-3, ♣ A-Q-10-9-4?
Extenuating Circumstances, Palm Springs, Calif.
You are right that I’m strongly opposed to bidding at the two-level with a poor suit. So it may appear illogical that I would act when non-vulnerable as a passed hand, and maybe even when vulnerable with the hand you quote. Getting “Center Hand Opponent” off to the correct lead and coming in cheaply seem like reasonable ideas, especially when your partner is unlikely to take you too seriously.
|
|
This is another deal from Kit Woolsey’s excellent new book, “The Language of Bridge.”
As East, you see your partner lead the heart queen; how do you get him to do the right thing after that?
You know the correct defense is for partner to lead a diamond through dummy so that the defense can take their four red-suit tricks, assuming declarer has at least two cards in each red suit — if he doesn’t, you surely have no chance to set the game.
The problem is that a club shift may look more attractive to partner than a diamond shift. So you need to help partner with suit-preference signals.
The answer is to win the heart ace at trick one and return the heart nine. Partner will know that you have the heart king when declarer doesn’t win the second trick, and he will also know that you clearly want him to shift to a minor. Since you had the choice between the heart ace and the heart king at trick one, the combination of your play of the heart ace plus the nine should be suit preference for the higher suit, diamonds. As you can see, the diamond shift is necessary if declarer has the club king and is 2-2 in the minors.
Had you wanted a club shift (switch the diamond queen and club king), you would have taken the heart king at trick one and returned the heart two, again using suit preference to distinguish between the two minors.