June 24th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 16 Comments
|
Can the dummy revoke, with the consequence of the opponents subsequently receiving one or two tricks? I would have thought that since everyone can see the dummy, there can be no revoke penalty. If declarer attempts not to follow suit in dummy, what can dummy do about that?
Right or Wrong, Bellevue, Wash.
There is no formal penalty for a revoke by dummy, but the director can restore equity by reversing the effect of the revoke. This is one area where dummy may speak, as well as being allowed to prevent declarer from leading out of the wrong hand. Additionally, at the end of the hand, he may draw attention to other irregularities.
You recently ran a deal in “Bid with The Aces” where you raised an opening bid of one heart to two, holding ♠ J-4, ♥ Q-7-4, ♦ A-9-4-3, ♣ Q-10-6-4. After your raise to two hearts, what would it mean if you doubled East’s balancing two-spade bid instead of passing? Would it suggest to your partner that you have some values in the minors and perhaps not the right point count or shape to bid three hearts, but you don’t want to give up the fight?
King of the Hill, Laredo, Texas
I think not. I’d expect, once we die in two hearts, that a double should be penalty-oriented. That doesn’t necessarily mean a vast trump stack — maybe Q-10-x-x and a trick-and-a-half on the side would suffice.
I have a question about Standard American opening style. I say that we should not open a four-card major (unless absolutely no other bid makes sense, typically in third seat). If you rebid a major, it should guarantee six cards or a very strong five. My friends say that you can open a four-card major, and a rebid shows five. Who is right?
Seconds Out, Lorain, Ohio
This is a question of system, not right or wrong. Opening a four-card major is not standard in ACBL. Opening a major normally shows five, and rebidding it generally shows six. Even if playing four-card majors, you try hard to avoid repeating a five-carder over a one-level response. In sharp distinction though, after a two-level response, rebidding a strong five-card major is perfectly fine if your hand is unsuitable for a bid of two no-trump.
|
After my partner opened one no-trump, the next hand overcalled two spades. Holding ♠ J, ♥ 10-8-7-5-3, ♦ K-10-4, ♣ A-J-4-2, I didn’t feel that I had enough to force to game in hearts. So I went through Lebensohl (by bidding two no-trump to puppet three clubs) and then bid hearts. But we missed a game when my partner had a maximum hand. What do you think of our bidding?
Walk-away Renee, Newark, N.J.
When the opponents prevent you from inviting game, you sometimes have to decide with invitational values to go high or low. With 9 HCP, I’d drive to game (expecting not to be alone in this decision). I’d bid three hearts; the choice of starting with a take-out double isn’t terrible, but here you might miss the 5-3 heart fit.
Yesterday we had a sequence in which my partner opened one diamond and the next hand overcalled one no-trump. I had a flat hand with two hearts and 11 points, so I doubled, and now my LHO escaped by transferring to two hearts. If I pass that call, is my partner forced to bid again?
Armed Forces, Pittsburgh, Pa.
A simple agreement is to play that the double of one no-trump sets up a forcing pass through two of your suit, but not higher. So in the sequence shown here, a pass would not be forcing. If your partner had opened one spade, your pass would be forcing.
|
June 23rd, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 14 Comments
The valiant knight of Triermain Rung forth his challenge-blast again, But answer came there none.
Sir Walter Scott
| N |
North |
| Both |
♠ Q
♥ 8 7 2
♦ Q 9 7 3
♣ Q J 10 7 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ A 8 5 4 2
♥ A 10 9 6 3
♦ J 4
♣ 5 |
♠ K 9 3
♥ 5 4
♦ 10 8 6 5
♣ A 9 6 2 |
| South |
♠ J 10 7 6
♥ K Q J
♦ A K 2
♣ K 8 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
Pass |
Pass |
| 1 NT |
2 ♣* |
Pass |
2 ♠ |
| Pass |
Pass |
2 NT** |
Pass |
| 3 ♣ |
All pass |
|
|
*Majors
**Minors
♥A
Given that two diamonds is a transfer to hearts, should you simply complete the transfer or do more? If you play a call of two no-trump here as a maximum hand with three good hearts headed by two top honors or better, that call would be ideal. I recommend it as simple and easily remembered; it might get you to three no-trump facing the right balanced 7- or 8-count.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ J 10 7 6
♥ K Q J
♦ A K 2
♣ K 8 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
2 ♦ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
June 22nd, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 8 Comments
Is there no respect of place, persons, nor time in you?
William Shakespeare
| E |
North |
| Both |
♠ A 8 5
♥ A K J 8 7
♦ A
♣ K J 5 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ K Q J 10 9 7
♥ 10 9 5
♦ 8 5 4
♣ 7 |
♠ 4
♥ 2
♦ K J 10 9 7 6 2
♣ Q 9 6 4 |
| South |
♠ 6 3 2
♥ Q 6 4 3
♦ Q 3
♣ A 10 8 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
3 ♦ |
| Pass |
Pass |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| 3 ♥ |
Pass |
4 ♦ |
All pass |
| 5 ♣ |
Pass |
6 ♥ |
All pass |
♠K
You do not have enough to drive to game here, so the question is whether you need to do more than bid two hearts. Since you would expect partner to find another call with, for example, the heart queen and a black major honor, a bid of two hearts looks sufficient.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A 8 5
♥ A K J 8 7
♦ A
♣ K J 5 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
1 ♦ |
| Dbl. |
Pass |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
June 21st, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 2 Comments
The degree of civilization which a people has reached, no doubt, is marked by their anxiety to do as they would be done by.
Oliver Wendell Holmes
| S |
North |
| None |
♠ K J 7 3
♥ K J 6 2
♦ A J
♣ K J 6 |
| West |
East |
♠ 10 8
♥ A 9 7
♦ Q 10 7 4 3
♣ 10 8 2 |
♠ 9 6 5 4 2
♥ 10 8 4 3
♦ K 6
♣ Q 5 |
| South |
♠ A Q
♥ Q 5
♦ 9 8 5 2
♣ A 9 7 4 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♣ |
Pass |
1 ♥ |
Pass |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
♦4
Not all bad hands oblige you to pass at every turn. Here, your shape requires you to compete to two hearts, even if your partnership doesn’t rate to have more than half the deck between you. With your extra shape, you shouldn’t worry about your honor location. Let the opponents worry about it instead.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 9 6 5 4 2
♥ 10 8 4 3
♦ K 6
♣ Q 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♦ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
Pass |
2 ♦ |
| ? |
|
|
|
June 20th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 5 Comments
One man is as good as another until he has written a book.
Benjamin Jowett
| S |
North |
| Both |
♠ J 2
♥ A 7 6 3
♦ Q J 7 4 2
♣ 7 6 |
| West |
East |
♠ A 6 5 3
♥ J 5 2
♦ 10 5
♣ K 10 9 5 |
♠ 10 8 4
♥ K 9 4
♦ K 9 3
♣ J 8 4 3 |
| South |
♠ K Q 9 7
♥ Q 10 8
♦ A 8 6
♣ A Q 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
2 ♣ |
Pass |
| 2 ♠ |
Pass |
2 NT |
Pass |
| 3 NT |
All pass |
|
|
♣10
Your partner’s raise to two spades suggests some extras in the form of four trumps, but not necessarily real extras in high cards. Though you have a fine hand in context, you do not really have enough to drive to game; but surely the three-level should be safe. I would bid three clubs now and be prepared to drive to game if given the slightest encouragement.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A 6 5 3
♥ J 5 2
♦ 10 5
♣ K 10 9 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♦ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| 1 ♠ |
2 ♦ |
2 ♠ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
June 19th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 2 Comments
Cowardice, as distinguished from panic, is almost always simply a lack of ability to suspend the functioning of the imagination.
Ernest Hemingway
| S |
North |
| E-W |
♠ A K 4 3
♥ A 7 4
♦ 10 4
♣ 7 5 3 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q 10 8 7
♥ K J 8 5 3
♦ —
♣ A K Q 9 |
♠ 6 5 2
♥ 10 9 6
♦ Q J 9 8
♣ 10 6 4 |
| South |
♠ J 9
♥ Q 2
♦ A K 7 6 5 3 2
♣ J 8 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♦ |
Dbl. |
Rdbl. |
1 NT |
| 2 ♦ |
2 ♥ |
2 ♠ |
Pass |
| 3 ♦ |
All pass |
|
|
♣K
There is no correct answer to the question of whether a new suit by advancer, the partner of the overcaller, should guarantee five cards, or of whether it should be forcing by an unpassed hand. I argue that it is better for constructive bidding to play it as “intended as forcing.” And even if it should be a five-card suit, what else can you do here but bid one spade?
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A K 4 3
♥ A 7 4
♦ 10 4
♣ 7 5 3 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♣ |
1 ♦ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
June 18th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 3 Comments
Now, it is true that the nature of society is to create, among its citizens, an illusion of safety; but it is also absolutely true that the safety is always necessarily an illusion. Artists are here to disturb the peace.
James Baldwin
| S |
North |
| N-S |
♠ K 5
♥ 8 7 4 3
♦ K 10 9 6 5
♣ 6 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q 10 8 4 3
♥ J 2
♦ 8 3
♣ K 10 7 4 |
♠ 9 7 6 2
♥ Q 10 9 6
♦ J 7 4 2
♣ J |
| South |
♠ A J
♥ A K 5
♦ A Q
♣ A Q 9 8 5 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 2 ♣ |
Pass |
2 ♦ |
Pass |
| 3 ♣ |
Pass |
3 ♦ |
Pass |
| 3 NT |
All pass |
|
|
♠4
On an auction of this sort, your partner will not have club length, so he surely has a balanced 12-14, and there is no reason that anyone but declarer will have a long suit. Since your side has half the deck, you might look for a lead that gives away the least. All things considered, a top heart seems less likely to do damage than either black suit, so I would lead the heart jack.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ K 9 5
♥ J 10 4
♦ J 9 2
♣ Q 10 8 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♣ |
1 ♠ |
| 2 ♣ |
2 ♠ |
All pass |
|
June 17th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 1 Comment
|
I have come across the idea that an opening lead of a low card means that you would like that suit led back to you; while a high spot-card opening lead means that you would not like that suit led back to you. Do you agree with that guideline — and should it apply in suit contracts as well as no-trump?
Lorna Doone, Fort Walton Beach, Fla.
At suits, I think a strict fourth-highest or third-and-fifth approach is best. From four or five cards at no-trump, second-highest from a suit with no honors may make sense. In the mid-hand, shifting to a high card from a bad suit makes equally good sense. But remember to play only those spot cards you can afford! And try to avoid leading the middle card from three; lead either top or bottom of three small.
I was in fourth seat and heard my LHO open one diamond. My partner doubled, and I jumped to two spades with ♠ A-Q-3-2, ♥ K-5-3, ♦ J-10, ♣ J-9-4-2. Now my LHO bid three diamonds, and my partner bid four diamonds. What would you recommend?
Acrophobic, Ketchikan, Alaska.
The four-diamond call should show a diamond control with spade fit, and a slam-try. You have enough to bid four hearts now; but if your partner signs off in four spades, it isn’t clear to me that you have enough to bid on. Your trumps are good, but you do have only four.
When your partner bids one diamond and you hold ♠ 8-4, ♥ K-7-3-2, ♦ Q-6, ♣ A-Q-9-6-4, would you respond one heart or two clubs? What factors are at issue?
Sound Bites, Dallas, Texas
This is very close. I’d normally bid one heart to avoid missing the fit in a major. I think if two clubs is absolutely game-forcing, I’d bid one heart. With game-forcing values, I’d bid two clubs and then introduce hearts later. It is a good rule to bid your longest suit first when you plan to force to game.
|
I can’t find any consistency in the literature as to which suit the “transfer suit” is. Many refer to it as the suit the transferee bids, while some others say it is the suit transferred to. What is your opinion?
Champion the Wonder Horse, Boston, Mass.
I wish I had a firm opinion to offer you. My instinct is that when there is a response of two diamonds to one no-trump, hearts is the transfer suit. Therefore, a call of two diamonds is the suit named or called, and hearts is the transfer suit or suit shown or promised. I hope that helps!
My partner opened one club, and the next hand bid two diamonds. I was looking at ♠ J-9, ♥ A-Q-3-2, ♦ Q-5-3-2, ♣ K-10-4, and didn’t want to make a negative double for fear of hearing spade bids. If I jumped in no-trump, I was worried that spades might be a problem. What would you have done here? I chose to bid hearts, and this did not work well.
Lost in Space, Casper, Wyo.
A call of two no-trump is possible here, since your partner can explore below three no-trump if he is short in diamonds. Even if he makes a non-forcing three-club call, you might be able to bid on (with a call of three diamonds or three hearts, perhaps). A heart call shows five cards. Incidentally, a negative double with 9 or more HCP and one major plus support for partner’s minor may work out. And double may be the least lie when you have five spades but not enough to invite game, say 8-10.
|
June 16th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 3 Comments
What is the answer? … In that case, what is the question?
Gertrude Stein’s last words
| S |
North |
| None |
♠ Q 7 6 4
♥ K 7 3
♦ K 5
♣ Q 10 9 5 |
| West |
East |
♠ A J 3
♥ J 5
♦ A 8 6 2
♣ K J 8 4 |
♠ —
♥ Q 10 9 8 2
♦ Q J 9 7 4
♣ A 7 3 |
| South |
♠ K 10 9 8 5 2
♥ A 6 4
♦ 10 3
♣ 6 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 2 ♠ |
Pass |
2 NT |
Pass |
| 3 ♥* |
Pass |
3 ♠ |
All pass |
*Feature
♣8
Your partner has suggested a good hand with short spades, or he could not back into an auction where he was unable to overcall at the one-level. He must surely also have club length.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 7 6 4
♥ K 7 3
♦ K 5
♣ Q 10 9 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♣ |
Pass |
1 ♠ |
| Pass |
2 ♠ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
June 15th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
One of the greatest pains to human nature is the pain of a new idea.
Walter Bagehot
| S |
North |
| N-S |
♠ A K 8 6 3 2
♥ K 8
♦ K Q
♣ K 7 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ 4
♥ 6 3 2
♦ 10 9 5 2
♣ Q 10 9 6 2 |
♠ Q J 10 5
♥ 7 5
♦ A J 6
♣ J 8 5 3 |
| South |
♠ 9 7
♥ A Q J 10 9 4
♦ 8 7 4 3
♣ A |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♥ |
Pass |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
| 2 ♥ |
Pass |
4 NT |
Pass |
| 5 ♠* |
Pass |
6 ♥ |
All pass |
*Two key-cards and the trump queen
♠4
It is tempting to force to game, but you don’t know which game you want to play. However, if you invite game in spades or no-trump, you are somewhat misrepresenting your assets. I suspect the least lie is to raise to two no-trump to show a balanced 18-count. This may lead to your missing a spade contract, but it still looks sensible enough. My second choice might be to invent a force to three clubs.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A K 8 6 3 2
♥ K 8
♦ K Q
♣ K 7 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
1 NT |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
|
The NEC tournament in Japan was recently won by a squad made up of one pair from Australia and one from New Zealand. In the finals, Tony Nunn from the winning Down Under team had to work very hard to generate a small swing for his side.
In one room, with two spades relatively comfortable for East-West, the Down Under team had sold out to one no-trump after West had shown the majors over a strong club.
Against one no-trump, the defenders led a spade to the queen and king; the spade nine came back and was covered and ducked. The defense could now take their four spades and two aces, but declarer had his seven tricks.
In our featured room, Tony Nunn played in three clubs after the auction shown, and West found the thoughtful lead of the heart ace and a second heart. Nunn won and played a trump to dummy, which was ducked, and a second trump to hand. When West discarded, declarer played a third trump to East, who led a spade to his partner for the heart ruff.
East now found the diamond shift, and Nunn read the position perfectly when he won in dummy and cashed one more trump. East was now subjected to an unusual squeeze: He chose to pitch a spade, so declarer came to hand with a diamond and ruffed out the spade king, with a diamond entry left in hand to cash his spade winner. Had East pitched a diamond, that suit would have run for declarer.
Making 110 was worth 1 hard-earned IMP.