March 11th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 15 Comments
|
I picked up ♠ J-9-2, ♥ J-10-8-7, ♦ J-5-3, ♣ A-10-8 and heard my partner open one diamond in third seat. The next player overcalled two clubs, and I wasn’t sure whether to make a negative double, raise diamonds or pass. What do you think?
Rumble Fish, Newport News, Va.
This is not a terrible example of an off-shape double, but you should reflect on the fact that partner did open in third chair, so there is always some question of whether he has a full opener. If you pass two clubs and your partner sells out as well, you probably have no great fit. If partner is short in clubs, he will reopen with a double or suit bid.
When is it prudent or acceptable to pass your partner’s one-club or one-diamond opening bid? Does the form of scoring matter for this decision?
Vacuum Cleaner, Hot Springs Village, Ark.
With balanced subminimum hands vulnerable, there is little merit in responding. With six HCP or more, you always respond; so it is the 4-6 HCP hands with a major and no fit where you would tend to respond to a minor. Similarly, you might pass a major-suit opener, since you already have found a playable spot. Non-vulnerable, the upsides of bidding include the tactical (stealing the hand or having them miss a game), finding a better fit or reaching game, or reducing your minus score.
I have a theoretical problem when holding 5-6 pattern with a longer minor. Holding, for example, ♠ Q-6, ♥ A-J-9-5-3, ♦ —, ♣ K-Q-9-8-3-2, should I include distribution points to make this hand strong enough for a reverse, or should I take a pragmatic approach by opening one heart and then repeating the clubs if necessary?
Going for Broke, Victoria, British Columbia
Reverses do not specifically guarantee a great hand; extra shape may allow you to upgrade certain hands. With a touching two-suiter and 5-6 shape with a minimum opening, I would tend to open the higher suit. When the six-carder is good and the five-carder bad, and the suits are non-touching, that may be too much of a distortion. Here, I might start with one club — who’s to say partner won’t start by bidding diamonds?
|
My question is about how much stock to put in shape as opposed to high cards when considering inviting game as responder. I recently picked up ♠ Q-10-4-2, ♥ J-8-5-2, ♦ —, ♣ A-Q-10-3-2 and responded one heart to my partner’s one-diamond opening. When he raised to two hearts, should I have bid on or passed?
Reach for the Skies, Juneau, Alaska
Vulnerable at teams, I would feel obliged to try for game. At pairs, my void in partner’s suit would be a negative in the context of only holding four trumps, as opposed to five or more. For the record, switch the hearts and clubs, and this hand is at least worth a try for game.
I am about to start working with a group of students who will begin bridge, and some of them have not played cards before. Do you think I should mention transfers in the beginning or introduce them later on? What about weak two-bids, or strong twos?
Tortoise Shell, Sacramento, Calif.
The most important concept is to understand what a trick is and what trumps are. Get them playing the cards before they learn to bid, and begin with Knock-out Whist if necessary. Weak twos are best, I think; they are just as “natural” as the strong variety. As for transfers, they can wait a while.
|
March 10th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 3 Comments
Human institutions depend for their existence and stability on the impulse of self-preservation and its close associate, the fear instinct.
Boris Sidis
| S |
North |
| E-W |
♠ A Q 2
♥ A Q 5 4
♦ J 5
♣ J 10 5 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ 10 9 8 4
♥ 9 7 2
♦ K 8 4
♣ Q 7 6 |
♠ K 6 3
♥ K J 10 6
♦ 6 3
♣ K 9 8 3 |
| South |
♠ J 7 5
♥ 8 3
♦ A Q 10 9 7 2
♣ A 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♦ |
Pass |
1 ♥ |
Pass |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♠10
You have too much to sell out cheaply. While a double would be card-showing not penalty, there is no need to do more than bid one no-trump and take it from there. If the opponents rebid in spades, I would probably let them play there.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K 6 3
♥ K J 10 6
♦ 6 3
♣ K 9 8 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| Pass |
Pass |
1 ♦ |
Dbl. |
| 1 ♥ |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
March 9th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Friday, February 23rd, 2018
Any man’s death diminishes me, because I am involved in mankind; and therefore never send to ask for whom the bell tolls; it tolls for thee.
John Donne
| N |
North |
| N-S |
♠ 7 5
♥ A 10 5 3 2
♦ A Q 7
♣ K 10 9 |
| West |
East |
♠ A J 8 6 2
♥ K 4
♦ K 10 6 5
♣ 6 3 |
♠ 9 4 3
♥ J 9 8 7
♦ 8
♣ J 8 7 5 4 |
| South |
♠ K Q 10
♥ Q 6
♦ J 9 4 3 2
♣ A Q 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♥ |
Pass |
| 2 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♠6
The two questions here are whether this hand is worth a drive to game, and if so, whether to mention the diamonds on the way to three no-trump, if there should be no eight-card spade fit. I say that the concentrated honors make it worthwhile to bid game, and that same factor argues for showing the diamonds and letting partner know the full story.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A J 8 6 2
♥ 7 4
♦ K J 7 5
♣ 6 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 NT |
Pass |
| 2 ♥ |
Pass |
2 ♠ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
March 8th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 12 Comments
No man thinks there is much ado about nothing when the ado is about himself.
Anthony Trollope
| N |
North |
| E-W |
♠ A 9 5
♥ A 4 2
♦ 7 6 4
♣ A 6 5 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ J 10 8 3
♥ 10 8 7
♦ J 10
♣ K Q J 9 |
♠ —
♥ 9 6 5 3
♦ Q 9 8 5 2
♣ 10 8 7 4 |
| South |
♠ K Q 7 6 4 2
♥ K Q J
♦ A K 3
♣ 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♦ |
Pass |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
1 NT |
Pass |
| 2 ♦* |
Pass |
2 ♠ |
Pass |
| 4 NT |
Pass |
5 ♣ |
Pass |
| 6 ♠ |
All pass |
|
|
*Game-forcing relay
♣K
Your partner’s double of the two-spade call is take-out and shows extras — the equivalent of a game-try with short spades. In context, your combination of decent spot cards plus a ruffing value suggests you have enough to make one game-try of three clubs and let your partner know where you live.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ J 10 8 3
♥ 10 8 7
♦ J 10
♣ K Q J 9 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| Pass |
1 ♦ |
1 ♥ |
Dbl. |
| 2 ♥ |
2 ♠ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
March 7th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 10 Comments
The hand you are dealt is determinism; the way you play it is free will.
Jawarhalal Nehru
| S |
North |
| Both |
♠ 7 6 2
♥ K 7 3 2
♦ J 5
♣ A K 6 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ K 10 5
♥ 10
♦ 9 6 4 2
♣ J 8 7 5 2 |
♠ J 9 8 4
♥ A J 8
♦ 8 7 3
♣ Q 10 9 |
| South |
♠ A Q 3
♥ Q 9 6 5 4
♦ A K Q 10
♣ 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♥ |
Pass |
3 ♥ |
Pass |
| 4 NT |
Pass |
5 ♥ |
Pass |
| 6 ♥ |
All pass |
|
|
♣2
This hand may not be quite worth a double followed by a heart bid, but the alternatives are so inelegant (a two-heart overcall or a bid of one no-trump?) that the more flexible route seems wisest. You plan to double and bid hearts, but this might also allow you to get to diamonds in some circumstances.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A Q 3
♥ Q 9 6 5 4
♦ A K Q 10
♣ 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
1 ♠ |
| ? |
|
|
|
March 6th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 8 Comments
Twixt the optimist and pessimist The difference is droll: The optimist sees the doughnut, The pessimist the hole.
McLandburgh Wilson
| S |
North |
| None |
♠ 6
♥ J 10 9 4 2
♦ K 6 5 2
♣ A 7 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ A J 9 7 3
♥ 7 5
♦ 9
♣ Q 10 8 3 2 |
♠ Q 10 8 4
♥ A 3
♦ Q J 8 4
♣ J 9 6 |
| South |
♠ K 5 2
♥ K Q 8 6
♦ A 10 7 3
♣ K 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
2 ♦ |
Pass |
| 2 ♥ |
Pass |
2 ♠* |
Pass |
| 4 ♥ |
All pass |
hearts |
|
*Unbalanced invitation with
♦9
Your partner has shown game-forcing values with a singleton club. Your hand could hardly fit better, despite having only 8 HCP. Use Blackwood, and be prepared to consider a grand slam if your partner comes through with the appropriate number of keycards. After all partner must have at least two keycards, surely, so where are your losers?
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 6
♥ J 10 9 4 2
♦ K 6 5 2
♣ A 7 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♦ |
Pass |
| 1 ♥ |
2 ♣ |
4 ♣ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
March 5th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
It is true, I never assisted the sun in his rising, but doubt not, it was of the last importance only to be present at its rising.
Henry David Thoreau
| S |
North |
| Both |
♠ K Q 6 4
♥ A 9 7
♦ 8 3 2
♣ A 4 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ 5 3 2
♥ Q 6 4
♦ Q 9 5
♣ Q 10 8 7 |
♠ 10
♥ 10 8 5 3
♦ K J 7 4
♣ K J 9 2 |
| South |
♠ A J 9 8 7
♥ K J 2
♦ A 10 6
♣ 6 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
2 NT* |
Pass |
| 4 ♠ |
All pass |
|
|
*Game-forcing spade raise
♠3
Leading a trump is far from safe here (partner rates to have a doubleton or tripleton honor in spades), and neither minor is at all attractive. Since declarer seems pretty weak, I might lead the heart ace, breaking all the rules about leading an unsupported ace, but expecting my partner or dummy to have the heart king.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ J 9 4
♥ A 6 2
♦ Q 6 3 2
♣ Q 10 7 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♥ |
Pass |
| 2 ♥ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
2 ♠ |
| All pass |
|
|
|
March 4th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 3 Comments
|
I have recently been introduced to New Minor Forcing, which was described to me as the equivalent of delayed Stayman to find a fit in my major or an unbid major. When your partner opens, then jumps to two no-trump, is there a parallel auction?
Gold Hunter, Little Rock, Ark.
A simple way to play is that anything but a pass is game-forcing over a jump two-no-trump rebid. To find out about partner’s shape, you can agree to use the unbid minor as potentially suspect. Over this, you would expect your partner to introduce an unbid major in which he has four cards, or to support you with three.
What is your opinion on the lead style in which the jack denies a higher honor and the 10 guarantees one? Is it good or bad in the long run, and what do you play? Incidentally, when playing third and low, how do you lead from, say, K-10-9?
Jacques Spratte, Panama City, Fla.
At trick one, I’m strongly against revealing leads like this; I find it helps declarer more than the defense. But in midhand, there are specific positions where it makes sense for the shift to promise or deny a higher card. The sight of dummy should let you know whether to tell the truth or not. I lead strict third-highest from interior sequences, so the nine from the holding you posit.
|
I have two questions regarding rubber bridge. First, if you defend a redoubled contract of two diamonds and take eight tricks, would you get the game bonus on defense? Second, if you are doubled in two diamonds, how much does that score when it makes nine tricks? Again, is there a game bonus?
Zero Hour, Carmel, Calif.
Non-vulnerable, you double the score for three down doubled, or 500, to make 1,000. Vulnerable, it is twice 800, to make 1,600. These penalties always go above the line; below the line, you enter only the score for bidding and making a contract, never for overtricks or undertricks. In your second question, the 40 for two diamonds is doubled to 80 — entered below the line, which is not enough to make game. Above the line, you get 50 for insult and 100 or 200 for the overtrick, depending on vulnerability.
How should a beginning partnership play jumps in a new suit by a passed hand in response to openings or overcalls?
Fast Learner, Boise, Idaho
Let’s assume all hands with suits worthy of pre-empting are opened. So if you pass and jump, you cannot have that. A simple rule is to play all jump overcalls by a passed hand as natural but too flawed somehow for an initial pre-empt. When partner opens or overcalls, then jumps in a new suit guarantee a real fit for partner and show length and strength in the bid suit. See bit.ly/AoBFitShowingJumps.
When missing six cards including the jack, how likely is that card to appear in three rounds? My partner says a 3-3 break is with the odds; I thought the odds favored a 4-2 break here?
Oddball, San Antonio, Texas
Each of you has a point; I’d call this one a tie. When missing an even number of cards greater than two, the odds tell us the suit will not divide evenly. However, the jack will put in an appearance either on any 3-3 break or when the jack falls singleton or doubleton. These combined chances come in at a little better than even money.
|
March 3rd, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 5 Comments
No single theory ever agrees with all the facts in its domain.
Paul Karl Feyerabend
| S |
North |
| None |
♠ A 8 3
♥ Q 8 6 4 3
♦ K 7 3
♣ J 7 |
| West |
East |
♠ K Q 10 7 2
♥ A 5
♦ 10 9 8
♣ Q 9 4 |
♠ 9
♥ J 10 9 2
♦ Q J 6 4 2
♣ 10 6 2 |
| South |
♠ J 6 5 4
♥ K 7
♦ A 5
♣ A K 8 5 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♣ * |
1 ♠ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
*15-plus HCP
♠K
With game-forcing values, you would need to find an exceptional hand to persuade me not to bid my longest suit first. The rationale is not so much that we should always find spades, even if I bid clubs first. It is more that if we have a club game or slam, we make it far harder to locate the suit unless it is introduced at once.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ J 6 5 4
♥ K 7
♦ A 5
♣ A K 8 5 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♦ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
March 2nd, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 8 Comments
O spare me, that I may recover strength, before I go hence, and be no more.
Psalm 39:13
| W |
North |
| None |
♠ K 9 8
♥ Q 7
♦ A 10 9 8 5 3
♣ A 5 |
| West |
East |
♠ 5 3 2
♥ A J 9 5
♦ 4
♣ K Q J 9 7 |
♠ 6 4
♥ 10 8 3 2
♦ K J 7
♣ 10 8 4 3 |
| South |
♠ A Q J 10 7
♥ K 6 4
♦ Q 6 2
♣ 6 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♣ |
1 ♦ |
Pass |
| 2 ♠ |
Pass |
4 ♠ |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♣K
Your partner’s four-diamond call shows the red suits and invites you to the party over a possible four-spade call from your opponents. Lo and behold, you have precisely the right cards to move on to five hearts. True, you have no values to spare, but you can imagine that if partner has 10 cards in the red suits, you have more offense and less defense than he could reasonably expect.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 6 4
♥ 10 8 3 2
♦ K J 7
♣ 10 8 4 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♥ |
1 ♠ |
| 2 ♥ |
3 ♠ |
4 ♦ |
4 ♠ |
| ? |
|
|
|
|
Today’s deal occurred at matchpoints, which might partially explain South’s imaginative rebid of one no-trump. His partner was somewhat less than complimentary after South failed in his contract of three no-trump, West leading the spade 10.
Declarer called for dummy’s spade two, and East took the trick with his king and shifted to a low club. South played low, and West’s queen won. The club return was ducked to declarer’s now-bare ace, and he crossed to dummy with a spade to the queen to run the jack of diamonds. West allowed this to hold, but took the next diamond and shifted to the heart nine. Now declarer was cut off from his hand, and took only seven tricks.
Observe the difference if you play dummy’s spade queen at trick one. If it holds, declarer will always make at least two spades, a heart, five diamonds and a club. On the actual layout, East would take the spade queen with the king and shift to a low club. Be careful: If you duck the club at trick two, the defenders may find the unpleasant shift to the heart 10!
But your counter to the club switch is to rise with the ace, then cross to dummy in spades, to run the diamond jack. Whenever West takes his king, the defense can only cash two clubs. If West shifts to a heart, you win with the ace and cross to hand with the spade jack to run the good diamonds. You take two spades, a heart, five diamonds and a club.