March 1st, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 10 Comments
Is there no bright reversion in the sky, For those who greatly think, or bravely die?
Alexander Pope
| S |
North |
| Both |
♠ K J
♥ A Q J 5
♦ A J 9
♣ Q 6 3 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q 4 3
♥ 6
♦ K Q 8 6 3 2
♣ J 10 8 |
♠ 10 8 7 2
♥ K 10 9 7 3
♦ 10 7 5
♣ 4 |
| South |
♠ A 9 6 5
♥ 8 4 2
♦ 4
♣ A K 9 7 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♣ |
1 ♦ |
1 ♥ |
Pass |
| 2 ♥ |
Pass |
2 NT* |
Pass |
| 3 ♠ |
Pass |
4 ♣ |
Pass |
| 4 ♦ |
Pass |
4 NT |
Pass |
| 5 ♥ |
Pass |
6 ♣ |
All pass |
*Relay
♦K
There are two issues to consider here: First, is your hand worth a two-heart bid? Maybe, but you don’t want your partner to get carried away; he might play you for considerably more if you act now. Second, will you get a chance to bid again if you pass? The answer is surely yes; the opponents are not likely to get beyond two diamonds before your next turn to call. So pass now and back in next time.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 10 8 7 2
♥ K 10 9 7 3
♦ 10 7 5
♣ 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| Pass |
1 ♦ |
Dbl. |
1 ♠ |
| ? |
|
|
|
February 28th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 5 Comments
When poisoned, one might as well swallow the plate.
Japanese proverb
| N |
North |
| None |
♠ J 10 9 2
♥ 6 5 4
♦ 10
♣ A J 10 6 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ A
♥ 8 7 3 2
♦ 7 6 5 4 3 2
♣ 8 5 |
♠ K 7 6 4
♥ K J 10 9
♦ J 9 8
♣ K 4 |
| South |
♠ Q 8 5 3
♥ A Q
♦ A K Q
♣ Q 9 7 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
Pass |
Pass |
| 2 NT |
Pass |
3 ♣ |
Pass |
| 3 ♠ |
Pass |
4 ♠ |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♦7
Your major-suit honors appear to be working overtime here. RHO is relatively unlikely to have three spades (as he did not make a support redouble), so you can at least make an invitation to game with a call of two no-trump. In fact, I’m torn between this and a bid of three no-trump, given that my minor-suit builders look so useful.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K 7 6 4
♥ K J 10 9
♦ J 9 8
♣ K 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
1 ♥ |
| Pass |
1 ♠ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
February 27th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 3 Comments
Minds are like parachutes. They only function when they are open.
Sir James Dewar
| W |
North |
| N-S |
♠ 9 7 6
♥ A 4 3 2
♦ A 6 2
♣ Q J 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ 8 5
♥ K 10 9 8
♦ 9 8 7 5 4
♣ 9 5 |
♠ A J 10 3 2
♥ 7 6
♦ J 10
♣ A 10 8 6 |
| South |
♠ K Q 4
♥ Q J 5
♦ K Q 3
♣ K 7 4 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
Pass |
1 ♠ |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♥10
Some partnerships, including mine, play that this sequence guarantees real clubs (at least four). If so, the choice now is whether to invite game in clubs or no-trump since, despite its lack of intermediates, this hand has real potential game interest facing a minimum opener. The location of my club honors persuades me to bid three clubs, as clubs seems like a safer part-score if the auction ends here.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 9 7 6
♥ A 4 3 2
♦ A 6 2
♣ Q J 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♣ |
Pass |
| 1 ♥ |
Pass |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
February 26th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 15 Comments
Let schoolmasters puzzle their brain With grammar, and nonsense and learning, Good liquor I stoutly maintain, Gives genius a better discerning.
Oliver Goldsmith
| N |
North |
| N-S |
♠ J 7
♥ A 8 7 3
♦ A Q 8 7 4
♣ 6 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ 6 4 3
♥ Q 10 6 4 2
♦ J
♣ Q 7 5 3 |
♠ K 10 9 8 2
♥ 9 5
♦ K 10 6 2
♣ J 10 |
| South |
♠ A Q 5
♥ K J
♦ 9 5 3
♣ A K 9 8 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♦ |
1 ♠ |
| 2 ♣ |
2 ♠ |
Pass |
Pass |
| 3 NT |
All pass |
|
|
♠6
An easy one this time, I hope. Your partner’s initial silence and subsequent double must be based on a chunky diamond holding. He does not need a great hand to double, since both opponents have limited their hands. I would lead a count-card diamond four, not the nine, which might confuse the count for partner.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ J 4 2
♥ Q 9 8
♦ 9 6 4
♣ Q 9 7 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♦ |
Pass |
1 NT |
| Pass |
2 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
| Pass |
Pass |
Dbl. |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
February 25th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 12 Comments
|
I picked up ♠ Q-6-4-2, ♥ Q-9-2, ♦ K-5, ♣ A-10-8-3 and elected to pass in third seat. When my LHO opened one club and my RHO responded one heart, should I have stuck with my initially pessimistic judgment and passed, or would you double here to show a maximum pass?
Silent Stephen, Durango, Colo.
Passing in third seat when you don’t really have an opening bid or a suit that you want partner to lead does make sense, I suppose. Opening one club is fine by me, though. But having passed and heard partner fail to overcall, you shouldn’t back in unless you have a reason. With only two diamonds, you do not have a good reason to bid nor any guarantee of a fit. You made your bed; now lie in it.
I have just started learning Keycard Blackwood. When my partner answered my inquiry to show zero or three aces. I had one keycard, so I signed off. My partner then passed with three, thinking I should already know he could not hold zero key-cards because he had opened the bidding. Does this make sense?
Slamma Jamma, Houston, Texas
Your partner should never assume you know he has three key-cards — unless he has either shown extras or initiated or co-operated in slam ventures earlier in the auction. Normal practice here would be to bid on with three by answering whether he has the trump queen. He can raise the trump suit to deny the queen, or cue-bid a king if he has the queen.
I picked up ♠ Q-9-8, ♥ K-4, ♦ A-Q-J-8-5-4, ♣ K-7, and in third seat decided that for tactical reasons this hand looked like a strong no-trump. When my partner transferred into hearts with a call of two diamonds, I was tempted to pass. This would have worked well, but I didn’t think I should risk my partner having a heart attack. What are your thoughts?
Swinging from the Rafters, Macon, Ga.
The no-trump opening bid is a perfectly sensible strategy in third chair (and there are plenty who might extend that strategy to other seats, too). Since the call is hardly a psych, I would respond to it as if I had a regular opening bid. Passing in mid-auction is no way to encourage partnership trust.
|
I may be out of touch with modern expert thinking in many areas, but one that particularly confuses me is the use of doubles and redoubles these days. Where would you advise me to look to read up on these subjects?
Red Card Ralph, Woodland Hills, Calif.
I would advocate the general rule about doubling that, facing a passing partner or when the opponents have explicitly or implicitly agreed a suit, almost all low-level doubles are primarily for take-out. I recommend Mike Lawrence’s Complete Book on Takeout Doubles as a good place to start your reading. For beginners, bit.ly/AoBTakeoutDoubles is a simple online resource as well.
Vulnerable and facing a fairly sound bidder, my LHO opened one spade, and my partner overcalled two clubs. When the next bidder pre-empted to three spades. I was looking at a somewhat unusual hand: ♠ —, ♥ A-K-2, ♦ A-J-9-4, ♣ A-K-10-4-3-2. What is the most sensible tactical or strategic approach here?
Grist to the Mill, New Brunswick, Canada
If the opponents promised to stay silent, I would bid four spades and then, over the likely five-club response, a case can be made for bidding five no-trump. Since you would cue-bid an ace in a red suit if you had one but not the other, this call must focus on the secondary controls. I would not be amazed if we were close to a grand slam but the opponents had a cheap save. Playing six clubs might be our best possible result.
|
February 24th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 3 Comments
To live means to finesse the processes to which one is subjugated.
Bertolt Brecht
| E |
North |
| Both |
♠ J 10 2
♥ K 10 3
♦ Q 7 4
♣ K 9 6 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ 8 6 5 4 3
♥ 7 6 4 2
♦ J 2
♣ 3 2 |
♠ A 9
♥ Q 9 8
♦ A 10 9 3
♣ Q J 10 8 |
| South |
♠ K Q 7
♥ A J 5
♦ K 8 6 5
♣ A 7 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
1 ♦ |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
2 NT |
Pass |
| 3 NT |
All pass |
|
|
♠4
Your partner has shown 22-24 or so. Your choice is to let him stew in two no-trump, to transfer to spades or — my choice — to use Stayman and then show your major-suit pattern. You can do this if you use Smolen, which I recommend, by bidding three of your four-card major over a three-diamond response, showing 5-4 in the majors. This way, you transfer declarership if you locate a 5-3 fit.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 8 6 5 4 3
♥ 7 6 4 2
♦ J 2
♣ 3 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
2 ♣ |
Pass |
| 2 ♦ |
Pass |
2 NT |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
February 23rd, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 9 Comments
Science is a first-rate piece of furniture for a man’s upper chamber, if he has common sense on the ground floor.
Oliver Wendell Holmes Sr.
| S |
North |
| E-W |
♠ 9 8
♥ 9 6 4
♦ A 9 7 2
♣ A J 4 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q 10 7 5
♥ K Q 10 7 3
♦ Q 8 6
♣ 6 |
♠ K J 6 4 2
♥ 2
♦ K 10 5 4
♣ 8 7 5 |
| South |
♠ A 3
♥ A J 8 5
♦ J 3
♣ K Q 10 9 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♥K
This hand is worth an immediate three-spade bid, not just because of the fifth spade, but also because of the honor location and the singleton heart. You want to encourage partner to bid on over the opponents’ likely call of four hearts. If four hearts is passed around to you, you will have an interesting decision, though. I’d favor bidding on, however undisciplined that might appear.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K J 6 4 2
♥ 2
♦ K 10 5 4
♣ 8 7 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♥ |
Dbl. |
2 ♥ |
| ? |
|
|
|
February 22nd, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 9 Comments
One sees great things from the valley, only small things from the peak.
G.K. Chesterton
| S |
North |
| N-S |
♠ J 7
♥ Q J 2
♦ A Q 9
♣ K Q J 7 6 |
| West |
East |
♠ 10 9 8 5
♥ K 3
♦ 10 6 5 4
♣ A 9 2 |
♠ A 6 4 3 2
♥ 9 8 5
♦ J 8 7
♣ 5 3 |
| South |
♠ K Q
♥ A 10 7 6 4
♦ K 3 2
♣ 10 8 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♥ |
Pass |
2 ♣ |
Pass |
| 2 NT |
Pass |
3 ♥ |
Pass |
| 4 ♥ |
All pass |
|
|
♠10
A quick reality check for those who think they have extra values, so should therefore bid on for fear of missing game: Your partner heard you ask him to bid hearts if he could. He did so, and indicated he was not interested in game. You have poor shape, only three hearts, and about a queen more than a minimum double. How likely is your side to make game? Not at all, I’d say. Pass and hope to go plus.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ J 7
♥ Q J 2
♦ A Q 9
♣ K Q J 7 6 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
1 ♠ |
| Dbl. |
Pass |
2 ♥ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
February 21st, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
The main function of a pseudo-promotion is to deceive people outside the hierarchy. When this is achieved, the maneuver is counted a success.
Laurence Peter
| E |
North |
| N-S |
♠ Q J 6 5 3
♥ 3 2
♦ A K J
♣ A K 9 |
| West |
East |
♠ 8 7
♥ 10 9 5 4
♦ 6 5 4
♣ Q 10 6 5 |
♠ 9
♥ K Q J 8 7 6
♦ Q 10 9 2
♣ 7 2 |
| South |
♠ A K 10 4 2
♥ A
♦ 8 7 3
♣ J 8 4 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
2 ♥ |
| 2 ♠ |
4 ♥ |
5 ♠ |
Pass |
| 6 ♠ |
All pass |
|
|
♥10
The most accurate description of your hand is to treat it as a balanced 18-19 and rebid two no-trump, which invites your partner to bid game. The small doubleton heart is not a positive feature of your hand, but you never promised your partner a rose garden. Rebidding two clubs here would be too likely to miss a game if your partner should pass.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ Q J 6 5 3
♥ 3 2
♦ A K J
♣ A K 9 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
1 NT |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
February 20th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 15 Comments
There is no mistake; there has been no mistake; and there shall be no mistake.
Duke of Wellington
| S |
North |
| Both |
♠ 7 6 4 3
♥ A J 9 7 4
♦ 7 2
♣ A 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ J 10 9 2
♥ —
♦ K J 8 3
♣ 10 9 8 6 4 |
♠ Q 8
♥ Q 10 5
♦ A Q 10 6 5
♣ Q J 3 |
| South |
♠ A K 5
♥ K 8 6 3 2
♦ 9 4
♣ K 7 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♥ |
Pass |
3 NT* |
Pass |
| 4 ♥ |
All pass |
|
|
*Raise to 4 ♥ plus some defense
♠J
The heart intermediates argue for a two-heart rebid here. Although one time in a hundred your partner will have a singleton heart and 3-1-4-5 shape, you are more likely to find that the 5-2 or 5-3 heart fit plays better than no-trump. Terrence Reese argued that a 5-4-2-2 pattern is best played in a suit, and my experience supports this theory.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 7 6 4 3
♥ A J 9 7 4
♦ 7 2
♣ A 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♣ |
Pass |
| 1 ♥ |
Pass |
1 NT |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
|
In the qualifying rounds of the NEC Trophy, Sartaj Hans of Australia had the opportunity for a nice play. He declared six clubs on the auction shown; this was an elegant sequence to get back to clubs after initially agreeing hearts.
After a top diamond lead, Hans won and drew trumps at once, seeing East discard a diamond and a heart, then took the heart finesse. When it lost and a heart came back, the bad break there came to light. Now the key issue was whether to play East or West for four spades. In a sense, the location of the spade queen was irrelevant to declarer’s play.
If West was the player with four spades, South could simply cash the remaining heart winners and ruff a heart to reach a five-card ending. If West held only three spades, they would ruff out. If he came down to the bare diamond king, declarer would cross to the spade king and ruff out that suit instead.
However, Hans decided that East’s failure to raise diamonds at his first turn suggested that he had only three diamonds. So West had six diamonds, three clubs and one heart, and thus only three spades.
Accordingly, it was East who was going to be the victim of a squeeze. Declarer won the second heart, played three rounds of spades ruffing in dummy, and trumped a second diamond in hand. At this point, he led the last club from hand and caught East in a simple major-suit squeeze. Contract made.