April 25th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 10 Comments
Some problems are so complex that you have to be highly intelligent and well informed just to be undecided about them.
Laurence J. Peter
| N |
North |
| None |
♠ 9 8 2
♥ Q 3
♦ J 7 3 2
♣ Q 5 4 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q J 10
♥ 10 9 5 2
♦ Q 10
♣ J 9 8 7 |
♠ K 7 4 3
♥ 6 4
♦ K 6 5
♣ A K 10 3 |
| South |
♠ A 6 5
♥ A K J 8 7
♦ A 9 8 4
♣ 6 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
Pass |
1 ♣ |
| 1 ♥ |
Pass |
Pass |
Dbl. |
| Rdbl. |
2 ♣ |
2 ♥ |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♠Q
Those controls make the hand almost worth forcing to game with a jump to three diamonds, but you do have only a 16-count, no matter how you upgrade it. I think a simple call of two diamonds should suffice, planning to raise spades at your next turn if partner corrects to two hearts. Over any other continuation but a pass, a spade call at your third turn will be natural and game-forcing.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A 6 5
♥ A K J 8 7
♦ A 9 8 4
♣ 6 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♥ |
Pass |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
April 24th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 10 Comments
Be through my lips to unawakened Earth The trumpet of a prophecy! O wind, If winter comes, can spring be far behind?
Percy Bysshe Shelley
| E |
North |
| N-S |
♠ Q 10 9
♥ J 10 8 4 3
♦ A J 5
♣ K 7 |
| West |
East |
♠ A 7 4
♥ 7 5 2
♦ 10 7
♣ A J 5 4 3 |
♠ J 8 6
♥ A
♦ Q 8 6 4 3 2
♣ 9 8 6 |
| South |
♠ K 5 3 2
♥ K Q 9 6
♦ K 9
♣ Q 10 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
Pass |
| 1 ♣ |
Pass |
1 ♦* |
2 ♦ |
| 2 ♥ |
3 ♦ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| 4 ♥ |
All pass |
|
|
*Hearts
♦10
This unusual auction by your partner describes a hand with a maximum and three hearts, plus a source of tricks in clubs, hoping for you to have a hand with some slam interest. You do not have that hand, so sign off in four hearts. Imagine the heart three were the queen, and you might do more.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 10 9
♥ J 10 8 4 3
♦ A J 5
♣ K 7 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 NT |
Pass |
| 2 ♦ |
Pass |
2 ♥ |
Pass |
| 3 NT |
Pass |
4 ♣ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
April 23rd, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 9 Comments
When vain desire at last and vain regret Go hand in hand to death and all is vain, What shall assuage the unforgotten pain And teach the unforgetful to forget?
Dante Gabriel Rossetti
| N |
North |
| None |
♠ J
♥ Q 8 5 3
♦ A K Q 9 8 6 5
♣ 5 |
| West |
East |
♠ A K Q 10 7 6 3
♥ K 7 4
♦ 2
♣ 3 2 |
♠ 9 8 5 4 2
♥ A J 2
♦ J 3
♣ 8 7 6 |
| South |
♠ —
♥ 10 9 6
♦ 10 7 4
♣ A K Q J 10 9 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♦ |
Pass |
| 2 ♣ |
2 ♠ |
3 ♦ |
4 ♠ |
| 5 ♣ |
5 ♠ |
Pass |
Pass |
| 6 ♣ |
6 ♠ |
Pass |
Pass |
| 7 ♣ |
All pass |
|
|
♦2
I could imagine leading the diamond king, trying to cash two or three tricks in the suit on the go, but dummy rates to be relatively short in diamonds, so I might not accomplish much by this lead. An alternative approach, which I prefer, might be to lead trumps, hoping the hearts will not run for declarer, and that I can stop the cross-ruff.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ 10 4 3
♥ J 5 3 2
♦ K 7
♣ Q 10 8 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♥ |
Pass |
1 ♠ |
| Pass |
2 ♠ |
Pass |
3 ♣ |
| Pass |
4 ♠ |
All pass |
|
April 22nd, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 2 Comments
|
Holding ♠ A-9-3, ♥ A-Q-4-2, ♦ 4, ♣ A-Q-7-3-2, I opened one club and raised the response of one heart to three. When my partner bid three spades, I cooperated with four clubs, and my partner now went back to four hearts. Should I have bid on — and if so, with what?
On My Uppers, Tucson, Ariz.
Your partner’s initial cue-bid promised at least slam interest (or else he would simply have signed off in game), but he rates to have no diamond control. Since you have diamonds controlled, I would trot out Blackwood, or Key-Card Blackwood if that is in your armory. Because your partner made a slam try, apparently without any aces, he is guaranteed to hold strong trumps.
At the start of play, what characteristics of either declarer’s or dummy’s hand might call your attention to the possibility of a squeeze?
Bridge Nut, Arlington, Texas
Typically, the possibilities for a squeeze exist when declarer arrives at a point where he has top winners, but slow rather than fast losers, and is one trick short of having the rest of the tricks. If you are simply missing an ace, you normally have to lose it. When you have all but one of the tricks in top winners, or can arrange to reach such a position, the possibility of legitimate (or illegitimate) pressure should be uppermost in your mind.
In New Minor (or checkback Stayman after opener’s rebid of one no-trump), can or should opener jump after his partner uses the relay? For example, with ♠ Q-10-2, ♥ K-5, ♦ A-8-7-3-2, ♣ K-10-4, if you rebid one no-trump after your partner’s one-spade response, might you jump to three spades over a two-club relay using two spades for a minimum hand with three spades?
Fine Weather Friend, Boise, Idaho
Absolutely yes. I often think that opener should take more advantage of the three-level responses, in some cases to show both minors when appropriate, but also to bid out hand pattern when he has had to rebid one no-trump with a singleton in partner’s suit.
|
I read your column online, and I am interested in how the expert players differ from us mortals. Do any of the top bridge players possess photographic memories?
Snapping Turtle, Cape Town, South Africa
I don’t know of any, but among past players, Oswald Jacoby had an eidetic memory, able to recall everything he saw, including bridge hands. Al Roth and Australian Tim Seres had similarly great recall, but there is also much to be said for the ability to forget every deal instantaneously once it is over. That way you focus on the new one with full concentration.
Holding ♠ K-2, ♥ Q-7-2, ♦ A-Q-9-8-4, ♣ Q-5-2, I opened one diamond, and my partner responded one heart. The next player bid two clubs, and I passed because although I might raise with three, I did not like my club or heart holding. My partner sold out (he had 4-4-3-2 pattern and eight points), and the opponents made two clubs when we could have made at least eight tricks in diamonds. Who, if anyone, was to blame?
Undercooked, Grand Junction, Colo.
If not playing support doubles — which I am lukewarm about — where your double would show three-card trump support, your action was surely correct. While you are allowed to raise with three trumps, I would need the heart jack to make that call. Conversely, your partner had just enough to bid over two clubs — the choice being between a take-out double or a raise to two diamonds. Neither is perfect, though, I admit.
|
April 21st, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
Good luck in most cases comes through the misfortune of others.
Jackie Stewart
| N |
North |
| E-W |
♠ A 4 2
♥ J 6 2
♦ J 8
♣ A K 8 4 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ 9 7
♥ 10 9 8 4
♦ A 10 9 6 4 3
♣ 7 |
♠ Q 10 3
♥ K Q 5
♦ K 5 2
♣ J 10 9 5 |
| South |
♠ K J 8 6 5
♥ A 7 3
♦ Q 7
♣ Q 6 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♣ |
Pass |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
2 ♠ |
Pass |
| 4 ♠ |
All pass |
|
|
♥10
When your partner has two equivalent cue-bids available (two diamonds and two hearts), the higher cue-bid should show four trumps, and the lower should show three. It is technically possible that your partner has six diamonds here, but let’s not confuse “technically possible” with the more normal hand type we see here. I’d bid two spades since I have nothing to spare for my earlier action.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K J 8 5 3
♥ A 7 3
♦ Q 7
♣ Q 6 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♦ |
Pass |
1 ♥ |
| 1 ♠ |
2 ♣ |
2 ♦ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
April 20th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 8 Comments
Thus happiness depends, as Nature shows, Less on exterior things than most suppose.
William Cowper
| W |
North |
| None |
♠ A K Q 4 3 2
♥ Q 4 2
♦ Q 4 2
♣ 8 |
| West |
East |
♠ 10 8 5
♥ J 9 3
♦ 10 7 6
♣ J 5 4 2 |
♠ J 9 7 6
♥ 8 6
♦ K J 3
♣ K Q 6 3 |
| South |
♠ —
♥ A K 10 7 5
♦ A 9 8 5
♣ A 10 9 7 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
| 2 ♥ |
Pass |
2 ♠ |
Pass |
| 3 ♣ |
Pass |
3 ♥ |
Pass |
| 3 NT |
Pass |
4 ♣ |
Pass |
| 4 ♦ |
Pass |
4 ♠ |
Pass |
| 6 ♣ |
Pass |
6 ♥ |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♥3
Your side does not appear to have an eight-card fit, and your partner surely rates to have a minimum opener, or he would have found a call at his second turn. While defending two clubs undoubled may not be your best possible score, it may well be the best result possible that you can achieve. So I would pass now.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ J 9 7 6
♥ 8 6
♦ K J 3
♣ K Q 6 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
1 ♥ |
Pass |
| 1 ♠ |
2 ♣ |
Pass |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
April 19th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 3 Comments
When I play with my cat, who knows whether she is amusing herself more with me than I am with her?
Montesquieu
| S |
North |
| None |
♠ A J 8 7 6
♥ K J 7
♦ K J
♣ 8 7 5 |
| West |
East |
♠ 10 4
♥ 10 3
♦ Q 7 2
♣ Q J 10 9 6 2 |
♠ 9
♥ Q 9 4 2
♦ A 9 8 6 5 3
♣ A 4 |
| South |
♠ K Q 5 3 2
♥ A 8 6 5
♦ 10 4
♣ K 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♠ |
3 ♣ |
4 ♣ |
Pass |
| 4 ♠ |
All pass |
|
|
♣Q
Had your RHO not doubled, you would have bid two hearts, of course. So should you now ignore the likelihood that there is heart length on your right and make the two-heart bid anyway? I’m not sure of the answer here. I’d certainly bid a better heart suit, but that doesn’t feel necessary here. I think I would pass and await further developments.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K Q 5 3 2
♥ A 8 6 5
♦ 10 4
♣ K 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
1 NT |
Dbl. |
| ? |
|
|
|
April 18th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 5 Comments
many languages fly around the world producing sparks when they collide sometimes of hate sometimes of love
Bei Dao
| E |
North |
| None |
♠ Q 8 7
♥ 9 7 3
♦ Q 9 5 2
♣ A Q J |
| West |
East |
♠ J 9 5
♥ A 2
♦ A 8 7 4 3
♣ 8 6 2 |
♠ 4
♥ K J 10 8 5 4
♦ K 10 6
♣ 9 5 4 |
| South |
♠ A K 10 6 3 2
♥ Q 6
♦ J
♣ K 10 7 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
2 ♥ |
| 2 ♠ |
Pass |
4 ♠ |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♥A
You described your hand perfectly at your first turn; if your partner wanted to play hearts, he would have passed when doubled. But he decided to run, and who are you to say that he is wrong? The optimal way to get to the better minor suit fit is to bid two no-trump and redouble if doubled. The additional bonus is that this way you ensure that your partner becomes declarer!
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 4
♥ K J 10 8 5 4
♦ K 10 6
♣ 9 5 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
1 ♣ |
| 2 ♥ |
Pass |
Pass |
Dbl. |
| Pass |
Pass |
Rdbl. |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
April 17th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 2 Comments
Our ship of state, which recent storms have threatened to destroy, has come safely to harbor at last.
Sophocles
| N |
North |
| Both |
♠ K 9 5
♥ K Q 6
♦ Q J 10 7 3
♣ A 10 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q J 10 6 2
♥ 5 2
♦ K 6 2
♣ 9 4 3 |
♠ 8 4
♥ 10 8 7 4 3
♦ A
♣ J 8 7 5 2 |
| South |
♠ A 7 3
♥ A J 9
♦ 9 8 5 4
♣ K Q 6 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♦ |
Pass |
| 2 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♠Q
You have three plausible actions here. You can overcall one diamond, perhaps planning to double if the opponents agree a suit cheaply. You can double, making sure you find a major-suit fit cheaply, if you have one, and perhaps minimizing the risk for your side, while possibly missing no-trump. Or, my choice, you can overcall one no-trump — the path with the highest risk but largest reward.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K 9 5
♥ K Q 6
♦ Q J 10 7 3
♣ A 10 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
1 ♣ |
| ? |
|
|
|
April 16th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 5 Comments
Laces for a lady; letters for a spy, Watch the wall my darling while the Gentlemen go by!
Rudyard Kipling
| S |
North |
| None |
♠ J 8 7 5 4
♥ 5
♦ J 8 5 4
♣ K 7 6 |
| West |
East |
♠ K 9 2
♥ A 10 7 6 3 2
♦ 7 6
♣ 8 3 |
♠ A 6
♥ J 8
♦ A K 10 9 2
♣ J 5 4 2 |
| South |
♠ Q 10 3
♥ K Q 9 4
♦ Q 3
♣ A Q 10 9 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
2 ♥ |
Pass |
| 2 ♠ |
All pass |
|
|
♦7
Here your partner has doubled for take-out. You can simply bid either minor, but I’d suggest a call of two no-trump to show both minors. Since you did not bid two no-trump over two hearts, this should not be read as natural. The question is whether you should try for game by raising the Sminor selected by partner. You have just enough to do that if you believe partner has promised extras.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ 10 2
♥ 9 5
♦ Q 6 5 3
♣ A 10 7 5 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♥ |
Dbl. |
2 ♥ |
| Pass |
Pass |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
|
Today’s deal comes from last year’s Gold Coast pairs tournament in Brisbane, Australia. It is not easy for North-South to bid to their best spot, the 4-4 fit in diamonds, where declarer can use the hearts to discard spade losers. With all the suits breaking in friendly fashion, nine tricks appear to be relatively straightforward. Should North have bid at all at his third turn? I’m not sure. Raising hearts with two doesn’t feel right, while bidding diamonds on such a weak suit also seems too committal.
Hearts rate to be a tougher place to play than diamonds, particularly if hearts were going to break 4-2. After the lead of the spade queen, declarer could see that he was going to be exposed to the risk of a force on repeated black suit leads. He had only seven top tricks and needed to develop diamonds to make his contract.
Declarer David Lilley neatly avoided this problem with the help of an intra-finesse in diamonds. He ducked the spade lead and, at trick three, after winning his spade ace, he led the diamond nine from hand. When West went up with the diamond queen and cashed a spade winner, then played the club jack and another club, Lilley ruffed, crossed to the heart queen and advanced the diamond jack, pinning West’s nowbare diamond 10 and making no fewer than nine tricks.
Had the diamond 10 not dropped, declarer would have given up a diamond and ruffed the next club, playing for hearts to be 3-3.