March 6th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 8 Comments
Twixt the optimist and pessimist The difference is droll: The optimist sees the doughnut, The pessimist the hole.
McLandburgh Wilson
| S |
North |
| None |
♠ 6
♥ J 10 9 4 2
♦ K 6 5 2
♣ A 7 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ A J 9 7 3
♥ 7 5
♦ 9
♣ Q 10 8 3 2 |
♠ Q 10 8 4
♥ A 3
♦ Q J 8 4
♣ J 9 6 |
| South |
♠ K 5 2
♥ K Q 8 6
♦ A 10 7 3
♣ K 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
2 ♦ |
Pass |
| 2 ♥ |
Pass |
2 ♠* |
Pass |
| 4 ♥ |
All pass |
hearts |
|
*Unbalanced invitation with
♦9
Your partner has shown game-forcing values with a singleton club. Your hand could hardly fit better, despite having only 8 HCP. Use Blackwood, and be prepared to consider a grand slam if your partner comes through with the appropriate number of keycards. After all partner must have at least two keycards, surely, so where are your losers?
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 6
♥ J 10 9 4 2
♦ K 6 5 2
♣ A 7 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♦ |
Pass |
| 1 ♥ |
2 ♣ |
4 ♣ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
March 5th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
It is true, I never assisted the sun in his rising, but doubt not, it was of the last importance only to be present at its rising.
Henry David Thoreau
| S |
North |
| Both |
♠ K Q 6 4
♥ A 9 7
♦ 8 3 2
♣ A 4 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ 5 3 2
♥ Q 6 4
♦ Q 9 5
♣ Q 10 8 7 |
♠ 10
♥ 10 8 5 3
♦ K J 7 4
♣ K J 9 2 |
| South |
♠ A J 9 8 7
♥ K J 2
♦ A 10 6
♣ 6 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
2 NT* |
Pass |
| 4 ♠ |
All pass |
|
|
*Game-forcing spade raise
♠3
Leading a trump is far from safe here (partner rates to have a doubleton or tripleton honor in spades), and neither minor is at all attractive. Since declarer seems pretty weak, I might lead the heart ace, breaking all the rules about leading an unsupported ace, but expecting my partner or dummy to have the heart king.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ J 9 4
♥ A 6 2
♦ Q 6 3 2
♣ Q 10 7 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♥ |
Pass |
| 2 ♥ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
2 ♠ |
| All pass |
|
|
|
March 4th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 3 Comments
|
I have recently been introduced to New Minor Forcing, which was described to me as the equivalent of delayed Stayman to find a fit in my major or an unbid major. When your partner opens, then jumps to two no-trump, is there a parallel auction?
Gold Hunter, Little Rock, Ark.
A simple way to play is that anything but a pass is game-forcing over a jump two-no-trump rebid. To find out about partner’s shape, you can agree to use the unbid minor as potentially suspect. Over this, you would expect your partner to introduce an unbid major in which he has four cards, or to support you with three.
What is your opinion on the lead style in which the jack denies a higher honor and the 10 guarantees one? Is it good or bad in the long run, and what do you play? Incidentally, when playing third and low, how do you lead from, say, K-10-9?
Jacques Spratte, Panama City, Fla.
At trick one, I’m strongly against revealing leads like this; I find it helps declarer more than the defense. But in midhand, there are specific positions where it makes sense for the shift to promise or deny a higher card. The sight of dummy should let you know whether to tell the truth or not. I lead strict third-highest from interior sequences, so the nine from the holding you posit.
|
I have two questions regarding rubber bridge. First, if you defend a redoubled contract of two diamonds and take eight tricks, would you get the game bonus on defense? Second, if you are doubled in two diamonds, how much does that score when it makes nine tricks? Again, is there a game bonus?
Zero Hour, Carmel, Calif.
Non-vulnerable, you double the score for three down doubled, or 500, to make 1,000. Vulnerable, it is twice 800, to make 1,600. These penalties always go above the line; below the line, you enter only the score for bidding and making a contract, never for overtricks or undertricks. In your second question, the 40 for two diamonds is doubled to 80 — entered below the line, which is not enough to make game. Above the line, you get 50 for insult and 100 or 200 for the overtrick, depending on vulnerability.
How should a beginning partnership play jumps in a new suit by a passed hand in response to openings or overcalls?
Fast Learner, Boise, Idaho
Let’s assume all hands with suits worthy of pre-empting are opened. So if you pass and jump, you cannot have that. A simple rule is to play all jump overcalls by a passed hand as natural but too flawed somehow for an initial pre-empt. When partner opens or overcalls, then jumps in a new suit guarantee a real fit for partner and show length and strength in the bid suit. See bit.ly/AoBFitShowingJumps.
When missing six cards including the jack, how likely is that card to appear in three rounds? My partner says a 3-3 break is with the odds; I thought the odds favored a 4-2 break here?
Oddball, San Antonio, Texas
Each of you has a point; I’d call this one a tie. When missing an even number of cards greater than two, the odds tell us the suit will not divide evenly. However, the jack will put in an appearance either on any 3-3 break or when the jack falls singleton or doubleton. These combined chances come in at a little better than even money.
|
March 3rd, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 5 Comments
No single theory ever agrees with all the facts in its domain.
Paul Karl Feyerabend
| S |
North |
| None |
♠ A 8 3
♥ Q 8 6 4 3
♦ K 7 3
♣ J 7 |
| West |
East |
♠ K Q 10 7 2
♥ A 5
♦ 10 9 8
♣ Q 9 4 |
♠ 9
♥ J 10 9 2
♦ Q J 6 4 2
♣ 10 6 2 |
| South |
♠ J 6 5 4
♥ K 7
♦ A 5
♣ A K 8 5 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♣ * |
1 ♠ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
*15-plus HCP
♠K
With game-forcing values, you would need to find an exceptional hand to persuade me not to bid my longest suit first. The rationale is not so much that we should always find spades, even if I bid clubs first. It is more that if we have a club game or slam, we make it far harder to locate the suit unless it is introduced at once.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ J 6 5 4
♥ K 7
♦ A 5
♣ A K 8 5 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♦ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
March 2nd, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 8 Comments
O spare me, that I may recover strength, before I go hence, and be no more.
Psalm 39:13
| W |
North |
| None |
♠ K 9 8
♥ Q 7
♦ A 10 9 8 5 3
♣ A 5 |
| West |
East |
♠ 5 3 2
♥ A J 9 5
♦ 4
♣ K Q J 9 7 |
♠ 6 4
♥ 10 8 3 2
♦ K J 7
♣ 10 8 4 3 |
| South |
♠ A Q J 10 7
♥ K 6 4
♦ Q 6 2
♣ 6 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♣ |
1 ♦ |
Pass |
| 2 ♠ |
Pass |
4 ♠ |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♣K
Your partner’s four-diamond call shows the red suits and invites you to the party over a possible four-spade call from your opponents. Lo and behold, you have precisely the right cards to move on to five hearts. True, you have no values to spare, but you can imagine that if partner has 10 cards in the red suits, you have more offense and less defense than he could reasonably expect.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 6 4
♥ 10 8 3 2
♦ K J 7
♣ 10 8 4 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♥ |
1 ♠ |
| 2 ♥ |
3 ♠ |
4 ♦ |
4 ♠ |
| ? |
|
|
|
March 1st, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 10 Comments
Is there no bright reversion in the sky, For those who greatly think, or bravely die?
Alexander Pope
| S |
North |
| Both |
♠ K J
♥ A Q J 5
♦ A J 9
♣ Q 6 3 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q 4 3
♥ 6
♦ K Q 8 6 3 2
♣ J 10 8 |
♠ 10 8 7 2
♥ K 10 9 7 3
♦ 10 7 5
♣ 4 |
| South |
♠ A 9 6 5
♥ 8 4 2
♦ 4
♣ A K 9 7 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♣ |
1 ♦ |
1 ♥ |
Pass |
| 2 ♥ |
Pass |
2 NT* |
Pass |
| 3 ♠ |
Pass |
4 ♣ |
Pass |
| 4 ♦ |
Pass |
4 NT |
Pass |
| 5 ♥ |
Pass |
6 ♣ |
All pass |
*Relay
♦K
There are two issues to consider here: First, is your hand worth a two-heart bid? Maybe, but you don’t want your partner to get carried away; he might play you for considerably more if you act now. Second, will you get a chance to bid again if you pass? The answer is surely yes; the opponents are not likely to get beyond two diamonds before your next turn to call. So pass now and back in next time.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 10 8 7 2
♥ K 10 9 7 3
♦ 10 7 5
♣ 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| Pass |
1 ♦ |
Dbl. |
1 ♠ |
| ? |
|
|
|
February 28th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 5 Comments
When poisoned, one might as well swallow the plate.
Japanese proverb
| N |
North |
| None |
♠ J 10 9 2
♥ 6 5 4
♦ 10
♣ A J 10 6 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ A
♥ 8 7 3 2
♦ 7 6 5 4 3 2
♣ 8 5 |
♠ K 7 6 4
♥ K J 10 9
♦ J 9 8
♣ K 4 |
| South |
♠ Q 8 5 3
♥ A Q
♦ A K Q
♣ Q 9 7 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
Pass |
Pass |
| 2 NT |
Pass |
3 ♣ |
Pass |
| 3 ♠ |
Pass |
4 ♠ |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♦7
Your major-suit honors appear to be working overtime here. RHO is relatively unlikely to have three spades (as he did not make a support redouble), so you can at least make an invitation to game with a call of two no-trump. In fact, I’m torn between this and a bid of three no-trump, given that my minor-suit builders look so useful.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K 7 6 4
♥ K J 10 9
♦ J 9 8
♣ K 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
1 ♥ |
| Pass |
1 ♠ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
February 27th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 3 Comments
Minds are like parachutes. They only function when they are open.
Sir James Dewar
| W |
North |
| N-S |
♠ 9 7 6
♥ A 4 3 2
♦ A 6 2
♣ Q J 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ 8 5
♥ K 10 9 8
♦ 9 8 7 5 4
♣ 9 5 |
♠ A J 10 3 2
♥ 7 6
♦ J 10
♣ A 10 8 6 |
| South |
♠ K Q 4
♥ Q J 5
♦ K Q 3
♣ K 7 4 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
Pass |
1 ♠ |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♥10
Some partnerships, including mine, play that this sequence guarantees real clubs (at least four). If so, the choice now is whether to invite game in clubs or no-trump since, despite its lack of intermediates, this hand has real potential game interest facing a minimum opener. The location of my club honors persuades me to bid three clubs, as clubs seems like a safer part-score if the auction ends here.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 9 7 6
♥ A 4 3 2
♦ A 6 2
♣ Q J 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♣ |
Pass |
| 1 ♥ |
Pass |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
February 26th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 15 Comments
Let schoolmasters puzzle their brain With grammar, and nonsense and learning, Good liquor I stoutly maintain, Gives genius a better discerning.
Oliver Goldsmith
| N |
North |
| N-S |
♠ J 7
♥ A 8 7 3
♦ A Q 8 7 4
♣ 6 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ 6 4 3
♥ Q 10 6 4 2
♦ J
♣ Q 7 5 3 |
♠ K 10 9 8 2
♥ 9 5
♦ K 10 6 2
♣ J 10 |
| South |
♠ A Q 5
♥ K J
♦ 9 5 3
♣ A K 9 8 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♦ |
1 ♠ |
| 2 ♣ |
2 ♠ |
Pass |
Pass |
| 3 NT |
All pass |
|
|
♠6
An easy one this time, I hope. Your partner’s initial silence and subsequent double must be based on a chunky diamond holding. He does not need a great hand to double, since both opponents have limited their hands. I would lead a count-card diamond four, not the nine, which might confuse the count for partner.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ J 4 2
♥ Q 9 8
♦ 9 6 4
♣ Q 9 7 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♦ |
Pass |
1 NT |
| Pass |
2 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
| Pass |
Pass |
Dbl. |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
February 25th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 12 Comments
|
I picked up ♠ Q-6-4-2, ♥ Q-9-2, ♦ K-5, ♣ A-10-8-3 and elected to pass in third seat. When my LHO opened one club and my RHO responded one heart, should I have stuck with my initially pessimistic judgment and passed, or would you double here to show a maximum pass?
Silent Stephen, Durango, Colo.
Passing in third seat when you don’t really have an opening bid or a suit that you want partner to lead does make sense, I suppose. Opening one club is fine by me, though. But having passed and heard partner fail to overcall, you shouldn’t back in unless you have a reason. With only two diamonds, you do not have a good reason to bid nor any guarantee of a fit. You made your bed; now lie in it.
I have just started learning Keycard Blackwood. When my partner answered my inquiry to show zero or three aces. I had one keycard, so I signed off. My partner then passed with three, thinking I should already know he could not hold zero key-cards because he had opened the bidding. Does this make sense?
Slamma Jamma, Houston, Texas
Your partner should never assume you know he has three key-cards — unless he has either shown extras or initiated or co-operated in slam ventures earlier in the auction. Normal practice here would be to bid on with three by answering whether he has the trump queen. He can raise the trump suit to deny the queen, or cue-bid a king if he has the queen.
I picked up ♠ Q-9-8, ♥ K-4, ♦ A-Q-J-8-5-4, ♣ K-7, and in third seat decided that for tactical reasons this hand looked like a strong no-trump. When my partner transferred into hearts with a call of two diamonds, I was tempted to pass. This would have worked well, but I didn’t think I should risk my partner having a heart attack. What are your thoughts?
Swinging from the Rafters, Macon, Ga.
The no-trump opening bid is a perfectly sensible strategy in third chair (and there are plenty who might extend that strategy to other seats, too). Since the call is hardly a psych, I would respond to it as if I had a regular opening bid. Passing in mid-auction is no way to encourage partnership trust.
|
I may be out of touch with modern expert thinking in many areas, but one that particularly confuses me is the use of doubles and redoubles these days. Where would you advise me to look to read up on these subjects?
Red Card Ralph, Woodland Hills, Calif.
I would advocate the general rule about doubling that, facing a passing partner or when the opponents have explicitly or implicitly agreed a suit, almost all low-level doubles are primarily for take-out. I recommend Mike Lawrence’s Complete Book on Takeout Doubles as a good place to start your reading. For beginners, bit.ly/AoBTakeoutDoubles is a simple online resource as well.
Vulnerable and facing a fairly sound bidder, my LHO opened one spade, and my partner overcalled two clubs. When the next bidder pre-empted to three spades. I was looking at a somewhat unusual hand: ♠ —, ♥ A-K-2, ♦ A-J-9-4, ♣ A-K-10-4-3-2. What is the most sensible tactical or strategic approach here?
Grist to the Mill, New Brunswick, Canada
If the opponents promised to stay silent, I would bid four spades and then, over the likely five-club response, a case can be made for bidding five no-trump. Since you would cue-bid an ace in a red suit if you had one but not the other, this call must focus on the secondary controls. I would not be amazed if we were close to a grand slam but the opponents had a cheap save. Playing six clubs might be our best possible result.
|
|
Today’s deal cropped up in a team game, where one declarer came back in triumph with what he was sure was a good result and was somewhat deflated at the comparison of scores.
Our first declarer had played four hearts on the lead of the diamond nine. He took East’s jack in his hand and led a heart to the jack and ace. East could have defeated the game by returning a diamond, but instead he exited passively with a spade. Declarer could regain the lead to draw trumps, eventually losing one trick in spades and diamonds, to come back with 10 tricks.
When it came to the score comparison, his teammates read out minus 420. Our hero was somewhat crestfallen and made his next mistake when he asked his teammates what had gone wrong.
“What do you mean?” came the answer in a surprised tone of voice. “I also led the diamond nine, which went to the jack and ace. Our declarer suspected the lead to be a singleton, so he made the essential play of eliminating clubs before touching trumps.
“Then declarer played on hearts, and my partner won and accurately gave me a ruff. But what could I do now? I was out of red cards, so I had to lead the spade ace and another spade. Declarer could now discard dummy’s losing diamond on the spade king. If I had played a club, giving a ruff-and-discard, the losing diamond would again have disappeared. I assume you played it the same way?”
“Almost exactly,” came the response.