January 1st, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Monday, December 18th, 2017
If it were not for a goodly supply of rumors, half true and half false, what would the gossips do?
Thomas Chandler Haliburton
| W |
North |
| N-S |
♠ 2
♥ K J 10 8 7
♦ A J 8 7 6
♣ Q 6 |
| West |
East |
♠ K Q J 10 7 6
♥ 9 6 4
♦ 10
♣ 10 8 4 |
♠ 4
♥ Q 3 2
♦ K Q 9 5 4 3 2
♣ 7 3 |
| South |
♠ A 9 8 5 3
♥ A 5
♦ —
♣ A K J 9 5 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
2 ♠ |
Pass |
Pass |
| 5 ♣ |
Pass |
6 ♣ |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♦ 10
There are no clues suggesting that any lead other than the suit in which partner has suggested length (if not necessarily strength) would be right. When you have a holding of this sort facing length, lead the top of a sequence, here the 10. The logic is that the risk of setting up a slow winner for the opponents by wasting an intermediate is sharply reduced.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ K 6
♥ 10 9 3 2
♦ 5 3
♣ A Q 7 3 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| Pass |
1 ♦ |
Pass |
1 ♠ |
| Dbl. |
Pass |
2 ♥ |
2 ♠ |
| All pass |
|
|
|
December 31st, 2017 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Sunday, December 17th, 2017
|
Can you explain to me how to calculate the odds for a 2-2 split and a 3-1 split when missing four cards in a suit? How does this calculation apply to playing for the drop of a missing queen?
Crunching the Numbers, Hamilton, Ontario
When missing four cards to a queen, after, say, cashing the ace and leading toward the king, the chances of a 2-2 break are in abstract slightly better than 50 percent. One hand has 12 vacant slots for that queen, and one has 11. However, it is worth emphasizing that the slightest clue, such as that one hand has five spades and the other has three, can shift the odds significantly.
Playing Pairs, at favorable vulnerability, if you pick up ♠ —, ♥ 6-4-2, ♦ A-K-8-6-5-4-3-2, ♣ 9-7, is your hand worth (or nearly worth) an opening bid, or would you go for a pre-empt? If the latter, at what level?
Wild Thing, Honolulu, Hawaii
I would never consider a one-level opener here. The choice is between a four and five-level pre-empt, and I could go either way. A three-level pre-empt lets the opponents in cheaply and also doesn’t do justice to these offensive values, even if it does leaves three no-trump open for our side.
I held ♠ Q-8-2, ♥ K-10-6-4-2, ♦ Q-3-2, ♦ Q-7. My partner opened one diamond, and the next hand bid two clubs. I thought my choice was to raise diamonds or double, since bidding two hearts seemed too aggressive. What was the best course of action here?
Time after Time, Salinas, Calif.
Passing is far from absurd; your partner will reopen with club shortness. If your partner has club length and a minimum hand, maybe you should stay out. Incidentally, a negative double with just spades might work better than with hearts, since you can correct a minimum response so much more efficiently. I don’t like a raise to two diamonds here; your trump support simply isn’t good enough.
|
The new ACBL regulations for opening and overcalling one no-trump state that you can make that call with a singleton ace, king or queen. Should we alert if we use this new style? If the answer is yes, then for how long does this apply?
One-Armed Bandit, Tampa Bay, Fla.
No alert is required. This will surely be a rare enough event that responder won’t take it into account in his bidding. And that is the way it should be. One doesn’t have to make the call with a hand with an easy rebid after opening the long suit. I suppose if you play that you must open one no-trump when in range, that might require an alert — but that isn’t what you asked.
What do you think of this collection, with both sides vulnerable, at matchpoints? You hold six small spades, two small hearts, queen-third of diamonds and the doubleton club jack. Your LHO opens one heart, your partner bids one no-trump showing 15-18 HCP, and RHO raises hearts. Would you transfer to spades with this?
Silent Speaker, Danville, Ill.
I would not be able to transfer to spades. I would bid two spades, natural and non-forcing. Yes, this is a tad aggressive, but I want to challenge the partscore, and I can easily imagine both contracts making. I know it might not work, but I cannot stay silent when I could bid at the two-level.
|
December 30th, 2017 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Saturday, December 16th, 2017
You don’t have to be a mathematician to have a feel for numbers.
John Forbes Nash
| E |
North |
| Both |
♠ Q
♥ Q 4 3
♦ J 10 6 5 2
♣ A K Q 7 |
| West |
East |
♠ A 9 7 8 6 2
♥ 9 8 6
♦ Q 8
♣ 10 4 |
♠ K 5 3
♥ J 7
♦ A K 9 4
♣ J 6 3 2 |
| South |
♠ J 10 4
♥ A K 10 5 2
♦ 7 3
♣ 9 8 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
1 ♦ |
| 1 ♥ |
1 ♠ |
2 ♦ |
Dbl.* |
| 2 ♥ |
2 ♠ |
4 ♥ |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
*Three spades
♦Q
Some 8-counts are not worth a further move after partner completes the transfer to a major. This hand is an exception, since your intermediates (even in clubs!) are all worth something, and the spade and heart 10s represent almost a full point between them. In fact, this hand is closer to a drive to game than a pass of two hearts.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ J 10 4
♥ A K 10 5 2
♦ 7 3
♣ 9 8 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
1 NT |
Pass |
| 2 ♦ |
Pass |
2 ♥ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
December 29th, 2017 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Friday, December 15th, 2017
You can find in a text whatever you bring, if you will stand between it and the mirror of your imagination. You may not see your ears, but they will be there.
Mark Twain
| S |
North |
| Both |
♠ A 8 6
♥ 3 2
♦ K Q 6
♣ K Q 8 7 6 |
| West |
East |
♠ J 10 9 7 2
♥ J 6
♦ A 7
♣ J 10 5 2 |
♠ K 5 3
♥ A 10 9 8
♦ 10 9 5 4
♣ 9 4 |
| South |
♠ Q 4
♥ K Q 7 5 4
♦ J 8 3 2
♣ A 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♥ |
Pass |
2 ♣ |
Pass |
| 2 ♦ |
Pass |
2 ♠ |
Pass |
| 2 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♠J
This auction is forcing: You may have a minimum (or even subminimum) hand, but you have spade support. So raise to three spades without a qualm. I could imagine producing a splinter raise to four clubs if my heart four were the ace, or even perhaps the king.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K 5 3
♥ Q 10 9 8 6 4
♦ J 10 9
♣ 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 2 ♥ |
Pass |
2 ♠ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
December 28th, 2017 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Thursday, December 14th, 2017
I don’t have pet peeves like some people. I have whole kennels of irritation.
Whoopi Goldberg
| E |
North |
| Both |
♠ A K Q 3
♥ Q 3
♦ Q 4
♣ A K J 10 8 |
| West |
East |
♠ 10 4
♥ 7 4
♦ A K J 10 9 8 5
♣ 9 3 |
♠ J 9 8 7 6
♥ K J 9
♦ 2
♣ 7 6 5 2 |
| South |
♠ 5 2
♥ A 10 8 6 5 2
♦ 7 6 3
♣ Q 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
Pass |
| Pass |
3 ♦ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| 3 ♥ |
Pass |
4 ♣ |
Pass |
| 4 ♥ |
All pass |
|
|
♦K
Brace yourself: This hand is an absolute minimum for a two-spade call, but you should still make that bid. Your ruffing value and honor in spades mean that you are offering partner something that will surely be useful while denying the opponents some space. So gird your loins and enter the fray!
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K 9 4
♥ 2
♦ 7 6 5 2
♣ 9 8 7 6 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
1 ♠ |
Dbl. |
| ? |
|
|
|
December 27th, 2017 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Wednesday, December 13th, 2017
No one believes more firmly than Comrade Napoleon that all animals are equal. He would be only too happy to let you make your decisions for yourselves. But sometimes you might make the wrong decisions, comrades, and then where should we be?
Squealer
| S |
North |
| None |
♠ 9 6 4
♥ K J 9 4
♦ K 8 3
♣ A Q 10 |
| West |
East |
♠ 10 8 5 3
♥ 7 2
♦ Q J 9
♣ 7 5 3 2 |
♠ K J 7 2
♥ 3
♦ A 10 6 4 2
♣ K J 4 |
| South |
♠ A Q
♥ A Q 10 8 6 5
♦ 7 5
♣ 9 8 6 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♥ |
Pass |
2 NT* |
Pass |
| 4 ♥ |
All pass |
|
|
*Game-forcing heart raise
♦Q
It feels right to double two clubs, which simply shows extras and is not purely for penalty — even if you would like it to be! When the opponents have agreed on a suit, most low-level doubles show extras. Here, when partner removes the double, you plan to bid two no-trump, suggesting these values.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K J 7 2
♥ 3
♦ A 10 6 4 2
♣ K J 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
1 ♥ |
Pass |
| 1 ♠ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
2 ♣ |
| ? |
|
|
|
December 26th, 2017 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Tuesday, December 12th, 2017
I feel like I’ve cheated. I never knew what to do. I was never a good enough painter to earn a living, and so I drifted into the theater, and I’ve had a successful life. I feel guilty that I’ve never done a day’s work in my life!
Barry Humphries
| N |
North |
| E-W |
♠ Q 7 5 4
♥ K 7 4
♦ K Q 4
♣ Q 8 7 |
| West |
East |
♠ K 9
♥ Q 9 5 2
♦ J 5 2
♣ K 6 5 3 |
♠ J
♥ J 8 6 3
♦ 10 9 8 7 6 3
♣ 10 2 |
| South |
♠ A 10 8 6 3 2
♥ A 10
♦ A
♣ A J 9 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♣ |
Pass |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
2 ♠ |
Pass |
| 6 ♠ |
All pass |
|
|
♥5
This hand does not have a right answer. You could pass, but that seems too likely to let the opponents reach slam. You could leap to six hearts at once, which does have a lot to recommend it if not vulnerable. However, if vulnerable, you could try a more restrained approach and bid four hearts, which might allow the opponents to stop in game if they are feeling cautious.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ J
♥ J 8 6 3
♦ 10 9 8 7 6 3
♣ 10 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
2 ♥ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
December 25th, 2017 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Monday, December 11th, 2017
So we shall let the reader answer this question for himself: Who is the happier man, he who has braved the storm of life and lived or he who has stayed securely on shore and merely existed?
Hunter S. Thompson
| N |
North |
| N-S |
♠ 5 2
♥ J 2
♦ A J 9 8 6 3 2
♣ 9 8 |
| West |
East |
♠ K Q J 4 3
♥ Q 7
♦ K
♣ Q J 10 5 4 |
♠ 8 6
♥ K 10 8 5
♦ 10 7 4
♣ 7 6 3 2 |
| South |
♠ A 10 9 7
♥ A 9 6 4 3
♦ Q 5
♣ A K |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
Pass |
Pass |
| 1 ♥ |
2 ♥ |
3 ♦ |
Pass |
| 3 NT |
All pass |
|
|
♠K
There is no reason to assume that you must lead spades to kill heart ruffs in dummy; you ought to have time to shift to trumps if that is needed. I can certainly see the case for leading the club jack, playing for ruffs. Indeed, with such weak diamonds, I prefer the club jack over the diamond lead as the best way to set up winners in the minors. I’d probably lead a diamond if I didn’t have the club 10.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ A 8 5 2
♥ A 3
♦ 10 7 5 4 3
♣ J 10 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
Pass |
1 ♠ |
| Pass |
1 NT |
Pass |
2 ♥ |
| Pass |
2 ♠ |
All pass |
|
December 24th, 2017 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Sunday, December 10th, 2017
|
I have never seen a discussion of what happens when my LHO overcalls my suit opening with one no-trump. If my partner doubles, when should I remove that double? And when they run after his double, how far are passes forcing?
Cowardly Leon, Jackson, Tenn.
A new suit by your partner is NOT forcing — suggesting 6-9 HCP. Responder will almost always double with 10 or more points, so you will tend to pass the double unless weak and distributional, when you can remove the double — at your own risk. If your RHO runs, passes are forcing through two of your own suit, and double from both sides should be defensive or penalty.
I held ♠ J-7 , ♥ A-Q-7-2 , ♦ A-Q-10-3-2, ♣ K-2 and opened one diamond. Over a one-spade response, I thought I did not have enough to reverse, so I rebid two diamonds to end the auction. We could not make a game, but belonged in a spade part-score. Where did we go wrong?
Second Wind, Phoenix, Ariz.
You can reverse on this hand without feeling you are overbidding too much, but an alternative and more practical approach might be to open a strong no-trump. With 16 HCP, the hand may be best described this way (but with 15 or 17 you might upgrade or downgrade appropriately).
I saw in a column online that the design on playing cards might need to be changed, and wondered what was the perceived need?
Facing the Muzak, Spartanburg, S.C.
After some abortive attempts to design symmetric card faces, the new Laws merely suggest that the backs and faces of the cards should be symmetrical — not that they must. It is up to the local regulating authorities to decide whether they will uphold these guidelines.
|
I only play on OK Bridge with pickup partners so I’m starting to forget some of the rules of bidding. If I open one heart and my LHO bids two clubs, is my partner’s call of two diamonds (or two spades) forcing if the opponents raise to three clubs? What if my partner bids a new suit at the three-level?
Richie Rich, Elmira, N.Y.
I believe that responder’s new suit does not set up a requirement on himself for a second call. It would be unusual to pass if the opponents raise, but not impossible. If responder bids a new suit at the three-level, it does set up a game force, for better or worse.
In no-trump, I often have the problem of how (or whether) to unblock a suit after I lead an honor and it holds. Having led from Q-J-10 and won the trick, how should I make it clear to my partner that I have that holding rather than Q-J-10-2 (or Q-J-10-3-2)?
Second Thoughts, Taos, N.M.
If you lead the queen and follow up with the jack, it almost denies holding the 10, so partner will not overtake on the second round. Thus if you lead the queen then follow up with the 10 or a small card, you can unblock the suit successfully. Partner will know to play his honor.
|
December 23rd, 2017 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Saturday, December 9th, 2017
What is best in mathematics deserves not merely to be learned as a task, but to be assimilated as a part of daily thought, and brought again and again before the mind with ever-renewed encouragement.
Bertrand Russell
| S |
North |
| N-S |
♠ Q 8 5 4 2
♥ 10 9 3
♦ J 7 6 5
♣ 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ 9 3
♥ J 7 4
♦ Q 10 8 2
♣ A K Q 9 |
♠ K J 6
♥ A 8 5 2
♦ A 3
♣ 10 7 5 4 |
| South |
♠ A 10 7
♥ K Q 6
♦ K 9 4
♣ J 8 6 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 NT* |
Pass |
2 ♥ |
Pass |
| 2 ♠ |
All pass |
|
|
*12-15
♣K
The raise to two hearts can be based on either four trumps or an unbalanced hand with three trumps, so many people use two no-trump here as a forcing relay to find out partner’s shape and range. I think a simpler route is to bid three no-trump and let partner decide which game he wants to play.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K J 6
♥ A 8 5 2
♦ A 3
♣ 10 7 5 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
1 ♣ |
Pass |
| 1 ♥ |
Pass |
2 ♥ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
|
At the 1998 Summer Nationals in Chicago, a hand arose demonstrating the truism that circumstances alter cases. The play of a hand can sometimes follow dramatically different lines, depending on whether there has been any opposition bidding.
You would want to reach six clubs here, in the absence of any opposition bidding. How you get there is a lottery, however; South’s jump to five clubs was as good a shot as anything else, and North felt he had more than enough to raise.
It looks normal enough to ruff a couple of spades in dummy, hoping that the black suits will behave. However, West’s opening bid here makes that line impractical. You have to find a different plan of attack on the lead of the diamond 10.
Strangely enough, the bad spade break is good news, if you think about it from the correct angle. It appears from the lead that West has short diamonds, and that therefore both of the other suits are likely to behave for you.
You must take care at trick one to duck the diamond lead and ruff in hand. Then play the spade ace and trump a spade high, stripping East of all his spades. Now you draw all the trumps and lead the heart king, then finesse in hearts. When East wins, he has only red-suit cards left and must return the lead to dummy, allowing you to discard all your spade losers on dummy’s heart and diamond winners.