December 12th, 2017 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Tuesday, November 28th, 2017
There is nothing more likely to start disagreement among people or countries than an agreement.
E.B. White
| S |
North |
| N-S |
♠ Q J 7 6
♥ 10 9 4
♦ 7 5
♣ Q J 5 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ K 9 5
♥ K 5
♦ A K 10 8 6 2
♣ 10 7 |
♠ 10 8 4 2
♥ 8 6
♦ Q J 4
♣ 9 8 6 3 |
| South |
♠ A 3
♥ A Q J 7 3 2
♦ 9 3
♣ A K 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♥ |
2 ♦ |
2 ♥ |
Pass |
| 4 ♥ |
All pass |
|
|
♦K
Your spade stopper is robust, your hand is not worthless and your partner has shown real extras. So you can invite game with a call of two no-trump. If your diamond seven were the queen, you’d drive to three no-trump. Note that the practitioners of Equal Length Conversion would not know if partner had any extras, since this auction might be based on five diamonds, four hearts and a minimum hand.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ Q J 7 6
♥ 10 9 4
♦ 7 5
♣ Q J 5 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♠ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| 2 ♣ |
Pass |
2 ♦ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
December 11th, 2017 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Monday, November 27th, 2017
Chances in future are just like sunlight, open the windows to see them.
Ali Zayeri
| S |
North |
| None |
♠ Q 6 5 2
♥ A J 2
♦ J 8 7
♣ J 9 8 |
| West |
East |
♠ 10 8 3
♥ 9 8 6
♦ Q 10
♣ A K 10 6 2 |
♠ J 9 4
♥ K 4 3
♦ 9 6 5 2
♣ 7 5 3 |
| South |
♠ A K 7
♥ Q 10 7 5
♦ A K 4 3
♣ Q 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♦ |
Pass |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
| 2 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♣6
This feels like a lead-directing double to me. Your partner isn’t doubling on high cards alone; he almost certainly has a spade stack. Since you have no reason to doubt his judgment, lead the spade queen and try and set up his tricks for him.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 2
♥ J 8 7 4 3
♦ J 8
♣ 10 6 5 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| Pass |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
1 NT |
| Pass |
2 ♥ |
Pass |
2 NT |
| Pass |
3 NT |
Dbl. |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
December 10th, 2017 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Sunday, November 26th, 2017
|
Over partner’s opening bid of one diamond, if responder bids two clubs and opener now bids two of a major, does that reverse show extra values?
Second City, Rockford, Ill.
It is a personal choice, but I recommend that rebidding diamonds shows an unbalanced hand with five or more diamonds. A major suit shows reversing shape and some extras, while two no-trump and three clubs are natural, the latter guaranteeing four trump or a semi-balanced hand. You may have to fib if your hand is unsuitable for a rebid of two no-trump.
A recent Sunday column had one person ask after describing their hand, which included a singleton: “Would you open a strong no-trump since the ACBL has approved such actions”? What does this mean, and what did they approve?
Hall of Fame, Dallas, Texas
A partnership agreement to open one no-trump with a singleton high honor was previously not legal — and also not very sensible, in my mind. Now the first half of that statement is no longer the case. Opening one no-trump with 15-17 and a high singleton honor is no longer frowned on — except by me.
Do you and your wife play much together? If so, how do you preserve the rules of diplomacy and politeness?
Love and Marriage, Saint John, New Brunswick
Judy and I do play together in Las Vegas, but we try to save all discussions for the privacy of our home. It will keep you out of the divorce courts and lead to better results! Discussions in the heat of the moment lead to words that cannot easily be retracted.
|
If, after I open and my partner responds at the one-level, I then jump to two no-trump (showing 18-19 points and a balanced hand), can my partner then use Stayman or Jacoby transfers?
Asking Shark, Riverside, Calif.
Many people by agreement DO play transfers here after opener shows real extras with a rebid of two no-trump, when responder has bid a suit at the one-level or has bid one no-trump. Even though one major may already have been mentioned, you get to stop at the three-level, show support with or without extras and offer a choice of game efficiently. It is always good for responder to be able to do so facing a balanced hand. Playing a version of Wolff sign-off plus three diamonds as a checkback accomplishes almost everything; but see bit.ly/AoBOpenerRebids for more discussions.
How would you bid this hand: ♠ Q-J-9-6, ♥ A-J-9-4-3-2, ♦ K-4, ♣ 2, opposite a strong no-trump, assuming that Stayman, Jacoby, Texas Transfers and Smolen are all in your toolbox?
Handy Dandy, Miami, Fla.
This is a hand with slam interest where we need to consult partner. I would use Stayman, and if I found a fit, I would make a splinter raise to four clubs. If I did not find a major, I would bid three spades to show five-plus hearts and four spades, planning to show my sixth heart over three no-trump. After that start, partner will have to make the run for slam.
|
December 9th, 2017 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Saturday, November 25th, 2017
Contrast is important in life. We understand what light is because we can compare it with what we know is dark. Sweet is made sweeter after we eat something bitter.
Tarryn Fisher
| E |
North |
| None |
♠ 9 5 4
♥ J 9 7 2
♦ A 10 9 6
♣ A J |
| West |
East |
♠ K J 7 6
♥ A 10 8 5 4
♦ 8
♣ K 10 9 |
♠ Q 3
♥ Q 6
♦ 7 5 4 3
♣ 8 6 4 3 2 |
| South |
♠ A 10 8 2
♥ K 3
♦ K Q J 2
♣ Q 7 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
Pass |
| 1 NT |
2 ♣* |
3 NT |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
*Majors
♥5
Assuming you play a forcing no-trump, so that a simple raise to two spades is constructive, that seems to be the value of your hand here. Treating the hand as a limit raise seems over the top to me, since your weak trumps are a danger signal. Move the club ace-jack into the spades, and your hand would have much more potential; you might treat it as a limit raise then.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 9 5 4
♥ J 9 7 2
♦ A 10 9 6
♣ A J |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
December 8th, 2017 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Friday, November 24th, 2017
The only real mistake is the one from which we learn nothing.
John Powell
| E |
North |
| Both |
♠ Q 8 6 5
♥ 8 4
♦ A K Q 5 3 2
♣ 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ 7
♥ A K J 7 5 3 2
♦ J 8 6 4
♣ 5 |
♠ K 9 4 3
♥ 9 6
♦ 10
♣ K J 10 9 8 6 |
| South |
♠ A J 10 2
♥ Q 10
♦ 9 7
♣ A Q 7 4 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
Pass |
| 1 ♣ |
4 ♥ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| 4 ♠ |
All pass |
|
|
♥K
Do not get carried away here. Yes you have shape and four trumps — a nice combination, but shape only goes so far. While you would happily compete to three spades, you should not jump to three spades here. Settle for a simple raise to two; you would need maybe the heart king in addition to do more. Incidentally, with the heart ace instead of the four, a jump to four diamonds would be available.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 8 6 5
♥ 8 4
♦ A K Q 5 3 2
♣ 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♦ |
Pass |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
December 7th, 2017 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Thursday, November 23rd, 2017
There are two kinds of people in the world, my friend: Those with a rope around the neck, and the people who have the job of doing the cutting.
Tuco, “The Good, the Bad and the Ugly.”
| S |
North |
| N-S |
♠ J 9 3
♥ 10 8 3 2
♦ 10 8 7 4
♣ 9 5 |
| West |
East |
♠ A K Q 8 7
♥ 9
♦ A K 6 5 3 2
♣ A |
♠ 10 6 2
♥ Q 6
♦ Q J 9
♣ Q J 10 4 2 |
| South |
♠ 5 4
♥ A K J 7 5 4
♦ —
♣ K 8 7 6 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♥ |
2 ♥* |
Pass |
2 ♠ |
| 3 ♣ |
3 ♥ |
4 ♥ |
4 ♠ |
| 5 ♥ |
6 ♠ |
Pass |
Pass |
| 7 ♥ |
Dbl. |
All pass |
|
| |
|
|
|
*Spades and a minor
♠K
All things considered, this is a pretty good hand. A simple call of three clubs doesn’t really do it justice — you might make the same bid with a Yarborough, after all. So I would jump to four clubs and hope partner can bid on to game with any sort of extra values or shape.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 10 6 2
♥ Q 6
♦ Q J 9
♣ Q J 10 4 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
1 ♦ |
1 ♠ |
| Pass |
2 ♠ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
December 6th, 2017 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Wednesday, November 22nd, 2017
The only thing more intimidating than a huge international film star is your mother-in-law.
Benjamin Walker
| N |
North |
| N-S |
♠ J 4
♥ K 10 4
♦ A K 10 5 2
♣ Q J 6 |
| West |
East |
♠ 7 2
♥ Q 8 7 2
♦ Q 8
♣ K 10 8 5 4 |
♠ A 10 9 8 3
♥ J 5 3
♦ J 6
♣ A 7 3 |
| South |
♠ K Q 6 5
♥ A 9 6
♦ 9 7 4 3
♣ 9 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♦ |
1 ♠ |
| 1 NT |
Dbl.* |
2 NT |
Pass |
| 3 NT |
All pass |
|
|
*Takeout
♣5
Your partner’s four-club call was a splinter, showing short clubs and a raise to at least four spades. Over your four-heart cuebid, he indicated he had nothing more to show, but even in the context of having made one effort, three key honors make the hand too good to pass. A general try of five spades feels right now, though you are expressing great trust in the soundness of your partner’s bidding.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K Q 6 5
♥ A 9 6
♦ 9 7 4 3
♣ 9 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
1 ♦ |
Pass |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
4 ♣ |
Pass |
| 4 ♥ |
Pass |
4 ♠ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
December 5th, 2017 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Tuesday, November 21st, 2017
The curious task of economics is to demonstrate to men how little they really know about what they imagine they can design.
Friedrich von Hayek
| S |
North |
| None |
♠ K 4 3 2
♥ A K 10 7 6
♦ K 5
♣ 10 8 |
| West |
East |
♠ 10 8 7 5
♥ J 9 2
♦ 10 8 6 4 3
♣ 7 |
♠ Q 9
♥ Q 5 4
♦ J 9 7 2
♣ Q J 6 5 |
| South |
♠ A J 6
♥ 8 3
♦ A Q
♣ A K 9 4 3 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♣ |
Pass |
1 ♥ |
Pass |
| 2 NT |
Pass |
3 ♦* |
Pass |
| 3 NT |
Pass |
4 NT |
Pass |
| 6 ♣ |
All pass |
|
|
*Hearts
♦4
How much do your bits and pieces add up to? Your trump cards are surely useful, so even though at least one of your side-suit honors will likely be facing shortness, I would bite the bullet and bid game here, and it feels right to raise spades. If you had the heart jack instead of the four, you might take a shot at three no-trump.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 9
♥ Q 5 4
♦ J 9 7 2
♣ Q J 6 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
3 ♠ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
December 4th, 2017 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Monday, November 20th, 2017
Eschew the ordinary, disdain the commonplace. If you have a single-minded need for something, let it be the unusual, the esoteric, the bizarre, the unexpected.
Chuck Jones
| S |
North |
| None |
♠ 9 7
♥ A K 8 2
♦ A 10 8
♣ K 8 7 5 |
| West |
East |
♠ K Q 8 3
♥ J 6 3
♦ K Q 9 6 4
♣ J |
♠ A 10 6 2
♥ 7 5 4
♦ 5 3
♣ Q 10 6 2 |
| South |
♠ J 5 4
♥ Q 10 9
♦ J 7 2
♣ A 9 4 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| Pass |
1 ♦ |
Pass |
1 ♠ |
| Pass |
2 ♠ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| 3 ♣ |
All pass |
|
|
♦K
Auctions of this sort tend to produce tricks for declarer on a cross-ruff. So I would lead a trump, expecting one time in 20 that I would have needed to cash out to beat the game, but that the rest of the time leading a trump would increase the penalty we are likely to collect.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ J 8 3
♥ Q 9 2
♦ A Q 7 6
♣ 8 4 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
| 2 ♠ |
Dbl. |
4 ♠ |
5 ♣ |
| Pass |
Pass |
Dbl. |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
December 3rd, 2017 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Sunday, November 19th, 2017
|
Where do you stand on leading from three cards (either from honor-third or from three small cards) in partner’s suit? Does it matter whether you are defending a suit or no-trump?
Board of the Rings, Bellingham, Wash.
In the old days, players would lead an honor from honor-third and top from three small. I hope those days are gone. The first is way too likely to cost a trick when declarer has a stopper such as king-jack third or ace-jack third. The second will confuse partner about the count in the suit — which may be critical to your partner. The honor position will normally be clearer than the count at the end of the first trick. This is why MUD (middle, up, down) is such a bad idea; it confuses both issues.
In a standard two-over-one system, dealer starts with one diamond. Say responder has game-forcing values with a four-card major and five clubs. When is it correct for responder to bid one of the major, and when is it correct for responder to bid two clubs?
Grey Gardens, Orange County, Calif.
You may not get unanimous agreement here, but my personal style as responder with clubs and a major is always to bid the minor unless you want to play the 4-3 major fit. So I might introduce a four-card major with three of the top four honors, but not a suit with one top honor. With something in between, I’d look at my overall strength and club quality. The better the hand, the more likely I’d be to bid clubs.
Do you like using computerized deals, and do you suppose that we receive wilder distributions with them than if we hand-dealt the boards? The suits never seem to split for me when using pre-dealt hands.
Marvelous Marvin, Harrisburg, Pa.
There is an underlying point in what you say, but you have drawn a false conclusion from it. Hand-dealt cards are not as thoroughly shuffled, and thus they tend to produce flatter shapes than they should. Additionally, I suspect that whenever suits don’t split, you remember it and give additional weight to that instance. I like the fact that everyone plays the same hands — often all around the country. We have computers to thank for that.
|
I am trying to learn the nuances of contract bridge bidding and would be grateful for an explanation of how transfer bids work, and when they apply.
Rubik’s Rube, Bay City, Mich.
Let’s keep it simple to start with. In response to a natural opening or an overcall of one or two no-trump, responder can use Stayman to locate a four-card major in his partner’s hand. Or he can transfer into his own major with five or more cards in that suit. The opener must complete the transfer, then responder will pass, bid a second suit, bid game or invite game. Details can be found at: bit.ly/AoBJacoby.
What would you advise on the following hand from a pairs tournament? As opener, holding ♠ A J-7-4-2, ♥ K-6-5-4, ♦ —, ♣ K-Q-9-4, I bid one spade, rebidding two hearts over my partner’s two-diamond response. Now came four clubs, which we play simply as a cue-bid, not necessarily shortage. Would you look for slam, and if so, how?
Hoity-Toity, Atlanta, Ga.
I can’t decide if I like this hand enough to cue-bid. I do have decent controls, but the void in diamonds and the weak hearts are negatives. If I did bid, I hate cue-bidding shortage in partner’s first suit, but anything else takes me past game. If I do make an effort, perhaps five hearts to focus on trumps might be best.
|
|
Today’s deal features two elements of defense that everyone should try to focus on. One involves the proper use of honors; the other involves understanding the role of small cards.
Here, North-South bid smoothly to game in hearts, and West leads the diamond king. On this trick, East must follow with the queen, promising either a singleton or possession of the jack. With queen-doubleton, you would want partner to cash a second diamond and work out what to do from there; you can, however, drop the queen from queen-doubleton if dummy has the jack.
To beat four hearts, West needs a spade lead from East, setting up the spade king before declarer can force out the heart king, draw trumps and run the clubs for a club discard. At trick two, West knows he can underlead in diamonds to East’s jack. Moreover, West can lead the diamond eight, his highest diamond spot card as suit preference, to get East to shift to a spade.
When East wins the diamond jack and shifts to a spade, declarer has a choice of evils. He can finesse and lose a spade trick at once, or he can go up with the ace and cross to dummy to take the trump finesse. Either way, though, he is doomed to go down a trick.
This concept of suit-preference carding by the defense is one of the hardest parts of the game for intermediate players to grasp. But once you do, it is worth the effort, since the opportunities for using these signals are so common.