January 16th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Tuesday, January 2nd, 2018
It’s dogged as does it. It ain’t thinking about it.
Anthony Trollope
| N |
North |
| Both |
♠ J 9 8 5
♥ K J 5
♦ 7 5 2
♣ Q 7 6 |
| West |
East |
♠ 10 7 3 2
♥ —
♦ K Q 10 4 3
♣ 10 8 4 2 |
♠ A
♥ Q 10 9 8 3
♦ J 9 6
♣ K 9 5 3 |
| South |
♠ K Q 6 4
♥ A 7 6 4 2
♦ A 8
♣ A J |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
Pass |
Pass |
| 1 ♥ |
Pass |
2 ♥ |
Pass |
| 2 ♠ |
Pass |
3 ♠ |
Pass |
| 4 ♠ |
All pass |
|
|
♦K
This hand is far too good just to jump to four spades now. (You would make that call if the club ace were the diamond queen, for example.) You should cue-bid three clubs and follow up with four spades at your next turn to try to get your extra values across. This sequence doesn’t specifically say anything, except that it promises more than a direct four-spade bid.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K Q 6 4
♥ A 7 6 4 2
♦ A 8
♣ A J |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♥ |
2 ♣ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
January 15th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Monday, January 1st, 2018
Heaven is for thee too high To know what passes there; be lowly wise: Think only what concerns thee and thy being.
John Milton
| W |
North |
| N-S |
♠ A Q 9 7 3
♥ K J 6 2
♦ 9
♣ Q 8 7 |
| West |
East |
♠ 5 4
♥ 9 8 4
♦ K 10 7 6 2
♣ A 4 3 |
♠ K J 10 8 2
♥ 7
♦ J 8 3
♣ K J 9 2 |
| South |
♠ 6
♥ A Q 10 5 3
♦ A Q 5 4
♣ 10 6 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
| 2 ♥ |
Pass |
3 ♥ |
Pass |
| 4 ♥ |
All pass |
|
|
♥4
I do not see any reason to steer clear of my five-card suit. The club queen is too likely to cost a club trick, and if there is any chance we can set this contract, I will surely have time to get back on lead and shift to clubs. I can see a case for a low trump lead, but my heart suit may be lying too well for declarer for that to be right.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ K 5 4
♥ K 5 2
♦ J 9 6 3 2
♣ Q 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
Pass |
| Pass |
1 ♥ |
Pass |
1 ♠ |
| Pass |
2 ♠ |
All pass |
|
January 14th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Sunday, December 31st, 2017
|
When a player goes to play a card and holds it so that his partner might be able to see it, does this constitute a played card? If so, what are the consequences?
Vision Decision, Sunbury, Pa.
The situation differs for declarer and the defense. Declarer can make a card visible to the defenders without penalty; to consider his card played, it must hit the deck, or very nearly so. By contrast, a defender’s card is deemed played when his card is visible, or might be visible, to his partner. Declarer can insist that the card be played.
Last week, you were discussing not passing with a good suit if pre-empting was an option. Do you have any simple rules about what sort of hand should pass initially, but then pre-empt over RHO’s opening bid at the one-level?
Second Chance, Atlantic City, N.J.
One possible explanation might be that you have a hand too defensive or too weak for an initial action, or just too weak a suit for a first-round pre-empt. Alternatively, you may have some sort of two-suiter, such as a four-card major and seven cards in a minor, that you deemed unsuitable for an initial pre-empt.
I’d like to know your opinion on leading an honor at trick one in no-trump when you want your partner to unblock an honor. Do you prefer the king to be a strong lead, or for the king and queen to ask for the unblock of the queen and jack, respectively?
Questing Beast, Mason City, Iowa
In your first method, the lead of a king requests partner to drop the queen or jack, while you signal attitude on the queen and ace leads. In the other style, the ace or king (depending on partnership agreement) asks for unblock of the queen. The queen asks for the unblock of the jack, while all other signals are attitude. The first method is simpler, but any agreement is better than none — as long as you have the same agreement.
|
My partnership’s style is that we will routinely upgrade 14 HCP to 15 and open one no-trump. We also downgrade some 18-counts. To disclose fully, we used to announce this as “14-plus to 18-minus” and clarify if anyone asked. I asked a director about it. In his opinion, our style is covered by the 15-17 announcements, and our variations are common in modern bidding. What do you think?
Dumbo, Grenada, Miss.
I don’t agree; your partnership agreements are more codified than those of most pairs, so your announcement seems not only proper, but an ethical requirement. I commend you for seeing this through to its proper conclusion.
My partner and I are unsure about two-over-one game-forcing in competition. We have been having problems determining which auctions are forcing to game. After an overcall, when responder bids a new suit at the two-level, does opener’s new suit at the two or three-level force to game?
How High the Moon, Elkhart, Ind.
When an unpassed hand makes a two-level bid in competition, all opener’s minimum actions should be non-forcing. A reverse or cue-bid sets up a game force, a new suit that is not a reverse is forcing for one round, but not necessarily to game. Similarly, responder’s minimum action over a non-game-forcing rebid would be invitational. A new suit, a jump, a reverse or a cuebid by opener does set up a game force.
|
January 13th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Saturday, December 30th, 2017
There are far, far better things ahead than any we leave behind.
C.S. Lewis
| N |
North |
| E-W |
♠ 8 3
♥ K 6 2
♦ A Q 6
♣ A Q J 7 6 |
| West |
East |
♠ 7
♥ Q J 10 9 4
♦ 10 7 3 2
♣ 8 5 3 |
♠ A K 4
♥ A 8 7 5 3
♦ K J 5
♣ K 2 |
| South |
♠ Q J 10 9 6 5 2
♥ —
♦ 9 8 4
♣ 10 9 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 NT |
Dbl. |
| 4 ♠ |
Pass |
Pass |
Dbl. |
| All pass |
|
|
|
♥Q
Start by cuebidding two spades, planning to bid clubs at your next turn. If partner shows a spade stopper by rebidding two no-trump, you can seriously consider slam; otherwise, you are likely to end up in five clubs. Four hearts is another possible game, but it will be up to partner to reach that suit.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 8 3
♥ K 6 2
♦ A Q 6
♣ A Q J 7 6 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♠ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
January 12th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Friday, December 29th, 2017
Don’t keep a man guessing too long — he’s sure to find the answer somewhere else.
Mae West
| S |
North |
| None |
♠ Q 4
♥ Q 10 6
♦ A Q 10 4 2
♣ 10 5 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ J 9 6 5 2
♥ J 8 5 4
♦ 7
♣ K J 4 |
♠ K 10 3
♥ K 9 7 3
♦ 6 5
♣ Q 9 6 3 |
| South |
♠ A 8 7
♥ A 2
♦ K J 9 8 3
♣ A 8 7 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♠5
In modern Standard American, where the two-overone response is game forcing, the best way for opener to define his hand at his second turn is to rebid two no-trump, to show 12-14 or 18-plus balanced. Meanwhile, a jump to three no-trump would suggest 15-17 and a semibalanced hand. That being so, simply raise to three no-trump, knowing partner will bid on with extras.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A 8 7
♥ A 2
♦ K J 9 8 3
♣ A 8 7 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
1 ♥ |
Pass |
| 2 ♦ |
Pass |
2 NT |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
January 11th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Thursday, December 28th, 2017
The easiest way to be cheated is to believe yourself to be more cunning than others.
Pierre Charon
| W |
North |
| N-S |
♠ 10 9 7 5
♥ K 4
♦ A Q 10 9 4
♣ K 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ K 6 4
♥ 5 3 2
♦ 7 5 3
♣ J 6 5 2 |
♠ 3
♥ Q J 9 8 6
♦ K 8 2
♣ A Q 8 7 |
| South |
♠ A Q J 8 2
♥ A 10 7
♦ J 6
♣ 10 9 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
Pass |
1 ♥ |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
4 ♠ |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♥2
Partner is asking for more information with fourth suit forcing. Your choice is to rebid two diamonds, emphasizing your shape, or two no-trump to show the club stopper. Here, the diamonds are so strong you should rebid them, both because it is economical and because you can show the stopper later.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 10 9 7 5
♥ K 4
♦ A Q 10 9 4
♣ K 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♦ |
Pass |
1 ♥ |
Pass |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
2 ♣ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
January 10th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Wednesday, December 27th, 2017
I do not think that I am ever overconfident. I am merely wholly confident, and I maintain that there is all the difference in the world there.
Edgar Rice Burroughs
| E |
North |
| None |
♠ A K J
♥ A 5 3
♦ 10 9 5
♣ 7 6 5 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ 8 5 2
♥ 10 9 2
♦ J 8 7 6 4 2
♣ 10 |
♠ 10 9 7 6
♥ K 6
♦ A K Q
♣ K Q 9 2 |
| South |
♠ Q 4 3
♥ Q J 8 7 4
♦ 3
♣ A J 8 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
1 NT |
| 2 ♥ |
2 NT* |
Dbl. |
3 ♣ |
| Dbl. |
3 ♦ |
3 ♥ |
All pass |
*Transfer (normally weak in one minor)
♣10
I prefer to play two no-trump as invitational, not forcing, here, but you can make an argument that you should bid two no-trump with this hand either way! More to the point, what other call can you make that shows this hand? A two-club call does not really describe it at all.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A K J
♥ A 5 3
♦ 10 9 5
♣ 7 6 5 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
1 ♦ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
January 9th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Tuesday, December 26th, 2017
Logic is like the sword — those who appeal to it, shall perish by it.
Samuel Butler
| S |
North |
| N-S |
♠ A 3
♥ K 7 5
♦ K Q 9 5
♣ K J 6 5 |
| West |
East |
♠ J 10 9 7 4
♥ 9 8 6 3
♦ 3
♣ 8 4 2 |
♠ 8 6 5 2
♥ 10 4 2
♦ J 6 4 2
♣ 7 3 |
| South |
♠ K Q
♥ A Q J
♦ A 10 8 7
♣ A Q 10 9 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 2 NT |
Pass |
7 NT |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♠J
You do not have enough to drive to game — if your partner has a Yarborough, you have remarkably few tricks. But this hand is too good for a simple rebid of one no-trump after doubling, which suggests about 18 to 20 HCP, so you should bid two no-trump. If your partner passes, you may be in the wrong part-score, but it is the best way to get to your most likely game.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K Q
♥ A Q J
♦ A 10 8 7
♣ A Q 10 9 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
Pass |
1 ♣ |
| Dbl. |
Pass |
1 ♦ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
January 8th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Monday, December 25th, 2017
Once is happenstance. Twice is coincidence. Three times is enemy action.
Ian Fleming
| S |
North |
| Both |
♠ K Q 7 2
♥ J 7 2
♦ K J 5
♣ 7 6 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ 8 4
♥ A Q 6
♦ 9 6 4
♣ K 10 8 5 3 |
♠ 10 9 6
♥ 10 9 8 4
♦ Q 8 7 2
♣ J 9 |
| South |
♠ A J 5 3
♥ K 5 3
♦ A 10 3
♣ A Q 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♣ |
Pass |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
| 2 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♣5
Whether playing teams or pairs, it helps to decide before you lead if you are looking to go aggressive or passive. Here, since dummy is a passed hand, I’d opt for a relatively passive approach. That said, you are surely going to choose between the majors, but a spade combines leading a long suit with a much smaller chance of blowing a trick. I’d lead the five, second-highest from four small.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ 9 5 4 3
♥ A J 5 4
♦ Q 3 2
♣ 9 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
Pass |
1 NT |
| Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
|
January 7th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Sunday, December 24th, 2017
|
What would you do if you were in third seat, holding ♠ Q-9-7-4, ♥ Q-4, ♦ K-7-3-2, ♣ A-6-4? The bidding went: one spade from my partner, two hearts to my right, three hearts from me to show a limit raise and four clubs from my partner. What should I do now?
High Flier, Kenosha, Wis.
You have no extras for your initial action, but at the same time you have decent controls, and slam is not out of the picture. You should bid four diamonds now and await developments. You hope partner can use Blackwood; your hand is not worth another slam try, since your heart holding is clearly unattractive.
With extras above a regular forcing two-club opener, do I have to bid more at my next turn than a simple call in my long suit? How should I play a jump to the three-level after a negative response?
Upping the Ante, Wichita Falls, Texas
After the two-club opening, there is never any need to “catch up.” In fact, while some people play those jumps as ace-asking, a better usage of space is to play jumps to three of a major as long diamonds and four cards in the bid major. Thus a rebid by opener of three diamonds denies a four-card major. This allows you to untangle strong hands with diamonds effectively.
I held ♠ K-9-7-5-3-2, ♥ Q, ♦ Q-7-2, ♣ A-6-4, and in second seat was not sure what to open. The suit seemed too weak for a pre-empt, and the hand seemed too weak for a one-level opening. So in the end I passed, and the deal was thrown in, with our side having play for nine tricks in spades. Did I do something stupid here?
Playing Possum, Evanston, Ill.
Your heart was in the right place, though I do not agree with your conclusion. With an ace and a king on defense and 11 HCP, notwithstanding that singleton queen, I would open one spade — though with little enthusiasm. For the record, if you do have a good suit, there is no hand that falls into the cracks between one spade and two spades. Open one or the other, or you will never catch up.
|
I held ♠ J-4, ♥ K-2, ♦ A-Q-3-2, ♣ K-J-9-7-4, and heard one heart on my right. How would you rank the options of an overcall, a double, a natural one no-trump overcall or even an unusual two no-trump? Would you pass if none of these appeals?
Cul-de-Sac, Vancouver, Wash.
I’d hate to pass here, and a two-club overcall on such a weak suit may be the least of all evils. Of the options you mention, double and two no-trump are unacceptable on shape grounds (too few spades, too few minor cards, respectively). A one no-trump overcall — planning to run to two clubs if doubled — is not absurd.
How should I have handled this deal from a recent pairs game? I held ♠ A-5-4-2, ♥ K-Q-7-4-3-2, ♦ 4, ♣ A-4. I opened one heart and rebid two spades over my partner’s game-forcing two-diamond call. When my partner bid three spades, I bid four clubs, and my partner bid four diamonds. What would you do now?
Second City, Winston-Salem, N.C.
I don’t think your hand is worth more than four spades now. You have only one trump honor, and facing a singleton heart, you might struggle to set that suit up. You have made your one try for slam; that is enough.
|
|
On this deal from an Open Pairs event a few years ago, Barnet Shenkin, formerly of Scotland, was the hero. He was playing with another Scottish expatriate, Sam Levinson.
Against four spades, West led the diamond king to Shenkin’s ace, and declarer played the spade king at trick two to East’s ace. Next came the diamond jack, followed by a third round of the suit, ruffed by Shenkin. Declarer got the bad news in trumps when he cashed the spade queen. Undaunted, he continued with a heart to dummy’s king (it would not have profited West to ruff a loser), followed by a club to his jack.
Shenkin then took the club ace and played a spade to dummy’s nine. East was already starting to feel the pressure, and it became unbearable when Shenkin cashed the spade jack.
In the four-card ending, what was East to do? A heart discard was out of the question, so he had to let go of a club. Shenkin then exited with the club queen, putting East on play in the two-card ending and forcing him to lead from his Q-10 of hearts into the tenace in dummy.
Did you notice the defensive resource? Shenkin remarked afterward that maybe he should have ducked the first trick to cut the defenders’ communications. Had East won the spade ace and given his partner a ruff by leading a suit-preference heart 10, West could then have underled his diamonds and received a second ruff.