October 17th, 2017 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Tuesday, October 3rd, 2017
To travel hopefully is a better thing than to arrive, and the true success is to labor.
Robert Louis Stevenson
| S |
North |
| Both |
♠ A Q 6 4
♥ J 6 5
♦ 10 9 5 4
♣ A Q |
| West |
East |
♠ 10 7 5
♥ A Q 9 4 2
♦ K 3
♣ 10 8 3 |
♠ J 9 8
♥ 10 3
♦ 8 7 6
♣ K J 9 7 2 |
| South |
♠ K 3 2
♥ K 8 7
♦ A Q J 2
♣ 6 5 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♦ |
Pass |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♥4
When you bid two clubs, you showed a limit raise or better in hearts, an action that starts at about a 10-count with four trump, give or take a point. When your partner rejects your game try you had better have a really good hand to continue the auction – and this isn’t it. You might bid two no-trump to invite game if your diamond four were the queen; but as it is, you have an easy pass.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A Q 6 4
♥ J 6 5
♦ 10 9 5 4
♣ A Q |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♣ |
1 ♥ |
Pass |
| 2 ♣ |
Pass |
2 ♥ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
October 16th, 2017 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Monday, October 2nd, 2017
Catch-22…specified that a concern for one’s own safety in the face of dangers that were real and immediate was the product of a rational mind.
Joseph Heller
| S |
North |
| N-S |
♠ K 7 6 5
♥ 9 6 2
♦ K Q J
♣ K Q 6 |
| West |
East |
♠ A J
♥ J 7 5 4 3
♦ 10 8 7
♣ 10 8 5 |
♠ 10 4
♥ A 8
♦ A 4 3 2
♣ 9 7 4 3 2 |
| South |
♠ Q 9 8 3 2
♥ K Q 10
♦ 9 6 5
♣ A J |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
2 NT* |
Pass |
| 4 ♠ |
All pass |
|
|
*game forcing with spade support
♥3
There is no need to panic just because the opponents have bid game. Your target at teams is to set the game, but at pairs, perhaps, to hold the overtricks if you cannot beat it. Since neither a club nor heart lead is in any way safe, you might as well go for the lead that carries the bigger reward if it is right; and surely a low club is more likely to set the game.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ J 2
♥ Q 3 2
♦ J 6 5
♣ K 10 8 5 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
Pass |
1 ♠ |
| Pass |
2 ♦ |
Pass |
2 ♠ |
| Pass |
4 ♠ |
All pass |
|
October 15th, 2017 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Sunday, October 1st, 2017
|
I have been trying to learn New Minor Forcing and thought the bidding problem presented today (after I opened one club and heard one spade from my partner) was perfect for a two diamond bid to show three spades and game going values. How am I missing the point of the convention?
Bill and the Comets, Monterey, Calif.
A little learning can be a dangerous thing. New Minor is very useful but one must distinguish two sequences, after your side, for examples, bids unopposed: one club – one spade. If opener bids one no-trump and responder rebids two diamonds, this is New Minor to show values, and ask about spade support. By contrast, if opener rebids two diamonds, this is known as a reverse. It shows clubs and diamonds and real extras. I hope that helps — please write to me again if I can help in this complex area.
When I held ♠ A-Q-7-5-3, ♥ Q-4, ♦ K, ♣ Q-10-4-3-2, I opened one spade in third seat. The next hand overcalled two diamonds and my partner joined in with two hearts. Should I rebid two spades, introduce my clubs, gamble on no-trump or raise hearts?
Flimsy, Albany, Ga.
You set a tough problem here. Rebidding the spades without extra length seems unattractive, and three clubs shows real extras. What does that leave? The call of two no-trump, which at least protects your diamond king, seems too much of a gamble. Given that partner is a passed hand, I am sure I’d let well alone, and pass out two hearts.
How would you bid this hand ♠ Q-J-9-6-2, ♥ 2, ♦ K-J-7-5-4, ♣ J-2 opposite a strong no-trump, assuming that Stayman, Jacoby and Texas Transfers are all in your toolbox?
Gabba Gabba, St. Louis, Mo.
There is no easy way to consult partner if you transfer to spades and hear your partner complete the transfer. You have to guess whether to pass, drive to game, or rebid two no-trump, which is correct on values but an unappetizing choice with 5-5 shape. I would prefer to use Stayman and rebid two spades, which for me suggests an unbalanced hand with invitational values and five spades.
|
With ♠ Q-J-8-2, ♥ 3, ♦ A-Q-10, ♣ K-Q-9-4-2 I assume you would open one club here, planning to rebid one spade. If your partner responds one heart and the next hand overcalls one spade, would you pass, rebid one no-trump or rebid clubs?
Stolen Bid, Duluth, Minn.
You should not rebid one no-trump with an unbalanced hand – the last thing you want to do is to encourage partner to repeat his hearts – unless he wants to. So the choice is to rebid clubs or pass. Since I would rather that a two club rebid had a sixth club, or more in the way of extras in an unbalanced hand than I currently possess, I’m going to go low and pass.
I see mention from time to time in your columns of a convention called Lebensohl. I think I understand the basic rules when the opponents overcall one no-trump; but are there other sequences where Lebensohl applies?
System Geek, Galveston, Texas
If your RHO overcalls your partner’s one no-trump opening, pass with really bad hands. If you bid you can double for take-out, or use Lebensohl, which allows you either to play at the two- or three level or set up a game-force. You can also use this method after your partner doubles a weak-two bid; but here you focus on distinguishing weak and invitational hands. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lebensohl discusses the matter in some detail.
|
October 14th, 2017 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Saturday, September 30th, 2017
There will be time to audit The accounts later, there will be sunlight later, And the equation will come out at last.
Louis MacNeice
| S |
North |
| Both |
♠ A 5 4 3
♥ J 8 7 5
♦ 8 5 2
♣ 6 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ 7
♥ 2
♦ K J 7 6 4
♣ K J 10 8 5 2 |
♠ J 9 6
♥ K Q 10 9 6 3
♦ 9
♣ Q 7 3 |
| South |
♠ K Q 10 8 2
♥ A 4
♦ A Q 10 3
♣ A 9 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♠ |
2 NT |
3 ♠ |
Pass |
| 4 ♠ |
All pass |
|
|
♥2
Did you fall into the trap of raising spades or cuebidding in a search for slam? You shouldn’t, because this auction doesn’t really promise spade support – partner would follow this route with a doubleton. You should rebid three no-trump here, expecting your partner to pick whichever game he considers appropriate. In the context of what you have already shown, you are as balanced as you could be.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K Q 10 8 2
♥ A 4
♦ A Q 10 3
♣ A 9 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
1 NT |
Pass |
| 3 ♦ |
Pass |
3 ♠ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
October 13th, 2017 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Friday, September 29th, 2017
O but we dreamed to mend Whatever mischief seemed To afflict mankind.
W. B. Yeats
| E |
North |
| None |
♠ Q 5
♥ Q J
♦ A Q 10 8 3
♣ A J 8 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ A J 10 3 2
♥ K 4
♦ J 9 4
♣ 9 7 5 |
♠ 9 8 4
♥ 10 9 7 5 3
♦ 7 5
♣ 10 6 2 |
| South |
♠ K 7 6
♥ A 8 6 2
♦ K 6 2
♣ K Q 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
Pass |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
6 NT |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♣7
We haven’t discussed ‘inverted minors’ for a while. Here a raise to two diamonds by an unpassed hand in a non-competitive auction is natural and forcing for at least one round. Unless either defender limits their hand with a re-raise to three diamonds, or with a call of two no-trump, the auction becomes game forcing. This is surely the best way to explore for a possible slam.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 5
♥ Q J
♦ A Q 10 8 3
♣ A J 8 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♦ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
October 12th, 2017 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Thursday, September 28th, 2017
Thinking is to me the greatest fatigue in the world.
Sir John Vanbrugh
| S |
North |
| N-S |
♠ K J 8 4 3
♥ 7 6 4 3
♦ 6 2
♣ 10 9 |
| West |
East |
♠ —
♥ 5 2
♦ Q 7 5 4 3
♣ J 7 6 5 4 3 |
♠ Q 10 9 7
♥ J
♦ K J 10 9 8
♣ Q 8 2 |
| South |
♠ A 6 5 2
♥ A K Q 10 9 8
♦ A
♣ A K |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 2 ♣ |
Pass |
2 ♦ |
Pass |
| 2 ♥ |
Pass |
3 ♥ |
Pass |
| 4 ♣ |
Pass |
4 ♥ |
Pass |
| 4 ♠ |
Pass |
5 ♠ |
Pass |
| 6 ♣ |
Pass |
6 ♥ |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♣5
Raise to three clubs, as much to keep the opponents quiet as to make a real try for game. Here the fact that you raise partner’s suit, rather than making a stronger try via a cuebid, should indicate to your partner that you have more of a courtesy raise than a really strong hand.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 10 9 7
♥ 2
♦ K J 10 9 8
♣ Q 8 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
1 ♣ |
1 ♥ |
| Dbl. |
1 NT |
2 ♣ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
October 11th, 2017 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Wednesday, September 27th, 2017
The events in our lives happen in a sequence in time, but in their significance to ourselves they find their own order the continuous thread of revelation.
Eudora Welty
| N |
North |
| E-W |
♠ A 7 6 2
♥ 6
♦ A J 6 3
♣ K 9 7 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ K J 3
♥ 9 5 4
♦ Q 10 8 7
♣ Q 10 6 |
♠ Q 10 8 5 4
♥ J 10 7 2
♦ K 9 2
♣ 4 |
| South |
♠ 9
♥ A K Q 8 3
♦ 5 4
♣ A J 8 5 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♦ |
Pass |
| 1 ♥ |
Pass |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
| 3 ♣ * |
Pass |
4 ♣ |
Pass |
| 4 ♥ |
Pass |
4 ♠ |
Pass |
| 6 ♣ |
All pass |
|
|
*natural and forcing
♦7
As someone who frequently espouses the virtues of fourth suit as an artificial rather than natural call, I’m pleased to tell you that on this occasion the fourth suit is natural and non-forcing. (For the record, though, had you opened one club, using two diamonds here would be strong and artificial.) This is one of the good reasons for opening one diamond with this shape.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A 7 6 2
♥ 6
♦ A J 6 3
♣ K 9 7 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♦ |
Pass |
1 ♥ |
Pass |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
1 NT |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
October 10th, 2017 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Tuesday, September 26th, 2017
The robbed that smiles steals something from the thief.
William Shakespeare
| S |
North |
| None |
♠ J 10 9 5
♥ K 6
♦ K J 6
♣ Q J 10 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ A 4
♥ Q 9 3
♦ 9 7 5 3 2
♣ A 8 5 |
♠ 7 6 3
♥ 10 8 7 4 2
♦ Q 10
♣ 7 6 2 |
| South |
♠ K Q 8 2
♥ A J 5
♦ A 8 4
♣ K 9 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♦3
This doesn’t feel like a hand on which it is sensible to play for penalty. Your weak diamond spots may not stop declarer scoring all his trumps in hand. But you have to bid, and even if you don’t have a classical diamond control you do have enough length in the suit to make the practical call of one no-trump. That gets your values across nicely to partner.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A 4
♥ Q 9 3
♦ 9 7 5 3 2
♣ A 8 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
1 ♣ |
1 ♦ |
| ? |
|
|
|
October 9th, 2017 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Monday, September 25th, 2017
This world where much is to be done and little to be known.
Samuel Johnson
| S |
North |
| None |
♠ 8 5
♥ K 10 8
♦ K 8 4
♣ A Q 9 5 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q 10 9 4 2
♥ A 9 2
♦ 10 9 3
♣ 6 3 |
♠ J 7 3
♥ 7 5 4 3
♦ Q J 6 5
♣ K 7 |
| South |
♠ A K 6
♥ Q J 6
♦ A 7 2
♣ J 10 8 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♠10
I can see an argument for a passive club lead – the fact that your partner has not doubled for a club lead should not affect that decision, since you know he is relatively limited. That said, I think I prefer a spade lead, since dummy has by no means guaranteed four spades. I think my second choice would be a diamond.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ J 9 3 2
♥ A 4
♦ K 8 5 4
♣ 9 7 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
Pass |
1 NT |
| Pass |
2 ♣ |
Pass |
2 ♦ |
| Pass |
2 NT |
All pass |
|
October 8th, 2017 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Sunday, September 24th, 2017
|
In a recent lead problem where you had a six-count, you advised attacking from queen-third in an unbid major against a no-trump contract. Would it be better to lead low or high? I worry about blocking the suit and misleading my partner that I have a four-card suit. As an aside, what about leading from a doubleton queen – would you suggest low or high?
Bow at a Venture, Manhattan, N.Y.
I’d always lead low from three to an honor; it might conceivably block the suit, but here your partner has plenty of high-cards, so this will be only a minor problem. By contrast, leading an unsupported honor might cost a trick in so many different ways — especially in an unbid suit. From a doubleton honor I lead the honor in partner’s bid suit, and try not to lead it at all if it is not.
I do not understand the implied contradiction between your statement in a recent answer that, if missing four cards, a 3-1 break is more likely than a 2-2 break, since you also say: play for the drop when missing four cards to the queen. How can you reconcile the two ideas?
Number Cruncher, Ketchikan, Alaska
In general terms a 3-1 break is more likely than a 2-2 break. But when deciding whether to finesse on the second round with a nine-card holding, you normally reach a position where one defender has followed twice, so you must halve that original 3-1 percentage. I should emphasize how close the original percentages are, though. Any known shortness or length in your opponents’ hands may tip you to the finesse.
Holding ♠ K-9, ♥ Q-4-3, ♦ A-J-4-2, ♣ Q-7-4-3 I heard my partner open one club and I responded one diamond. What would you do when your partner raises to three diamonds? Should you settle for three no-trump, show a major in the hope of reaching three no-trump when it is right, or look for slam?
Flat Earther, San Francisco, Calif.
Your soft values suggest bidding three no-trump, as if partner is short in one major, so that your values there are wasted, you may not make any game. If I did explore, I guess I would bid three spades. I really think it is just a guess, and the three no-trump call is the best of a bad job.
|
In third seat opening light in a major suit seems protected by the fact that your partner has Drury available. But should a third-seat opening in a minor be very close to opening bid strength? And where there is a choice, would opening a reasonable four-card major be a better choice?
Pushing the Boat Out, Doylestown, Pa.
With hands in the 10-12 range, open a good suit if you have one, planning to pass as soon as is sensible. With a full if minimum opener in the range 12-14, I tend to make my normal opening bid, planning to keep the auction open. A lead directer with a four-card major is relatively unusual though not absurd, of course. Pass balanced 10-counts unless you know what you want partner to lead.
With strong balanced hands is it logical to extend the three-point range approach, so that after opening two clubs a rebid of two no-trump shows 22-24 and a rebid of three no-trump shows 25-27? Also, what should a three no-trump opener show? A balanced powerhouse, or gambling with a long minor?
Tiers, Before Bedtime, Saint John’s, Newfoundland
Use three-point ranges for a one no-trump opening and rebid. You can invite facing those sequences, but you have to put up or shut up facing a two no-trump opening or rebid. Perhaps use an upper limit of 17 with no five-card suit for a one no-trump opener, and a good 11 to a bad 14 for the one no-trump rebid if you want to be daring. Use two point ranges for the higher actions. If you play the Kokish two heart rebid (see https://www.larryco.com/bridge-learning-center/detail/573) you can have your cake and eat it too.
|
|
This month I am delighted to be able to run deals from Frank Stewart’s new book. Keys to Winning Bridge is not only a book with tips that will help players at all levels, it is also a book with a social conscience, since Frank devotes all the income from the book to his local Fayette charities. For details of the book and other of his works, go to http://www.bridgeworld.com/indexphp.php?page=/pages/bookstore/authorgallerypages/authorgallerypage_251.html.
This is a declarer play problem from the book. As Stewart says, correct timing requires an ability to visualize and manipulate a card array; it requires foresight acquired through practice.
Against three no-trump West leads a low heart, and declarer puts up dummy’s jack, winning the trick. I’m willing to bet the majority of declarers would take a diamond finesse next. If they do so, West will win and lead a club, putting South to a nasty guess, since now South has only eight top tricks. He can make his game if the club finesse works or if spades break 3-3, but he must decide which play to try.
For example, in the diagramed position declarer must play on spades. But switch the club king and spade five, for instance. Now if South rejects the club finesse, West can pitch hearts and keep enough clubs to set the game.
After South wins the first trick, he should take his three high spades. Should the suit break 4-2, South would know he needed the club finesse if the diamond finesse didn’t work.