August 27th, 2017 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Sunday, August 13th, 2017
|
At IMPs I dealt myself ♠ A-3-2, ♥ A-5-3, ♦ 8-6-4-3, ♣ A-4-2, a hand with nine losers and no intermediates. I passed, and the deal was thrown in. At the other table, the opponents opened and played their four-four diamond fit for +90. Any comments?
Better Business, Muncie, Ind.
I’ve not grown rich by passing 12 counts but if I did pass one it would be because it had too few aces, not too many. In judging whether to open the bidding, naming a suit you actually hold is better than bidding a three-card suit. But when you open a weak suit, partner often leads the wrong thing. I might even pretend I didn’t have four diamonds and might open one club. In my opinion, passing is more of a view than opening, but ♠ K-J-2, ♥ A-4-2, ♦ J-6-4-3, ♣ K-5-4 is a hand I might pass.
I understand Jeff Meckstroth has just been elected to the Hall of Fame. This makes me wonder who might be on your list of candidates who should be considered for the hall but have not made it yet.
Flim-Flam Man, Lakeland, Fla.
All my Aces contemporaries who wish to be considered are already in there (the one exception preferring not to be put forward). I feel that women are underrepresented; if what counts is being preeminent in your own field, then in alphabetical order: Lynn Deas, Jill Myers, and Judi Radin all have a place.
I need help on actions by passed hands. Holding ♠ Q-5, ♥ K-Q-8-5, ♦ 9-6-4-2, ♣ J-3-2, my RHO opened one diamond. I passed, and I heard a one heart response to my left. My partner overcalled one spade, and RHO doubled, to show three hearts. Am I strong enough to redouble – or does that send a specific message here?
Rissoles, Evanston, Ill.
A redouble is not conventional. It suggests ownership of the hand (say 10+) typically without support, and asks partner to join in as appropriate – either by bidding a second suit or doubling the opponents. Change your diamond two to the king and you might redouble, though I think I would actually just bid one no-trump. So I would pass for the time being.
|
You recently discussed what a jump to three no-trump in response to an opener should be played as. I agree it must be natural in response to a minor, but what about playing the jump to three no-trump, facing a one spade opening, as an unspecified mini-splinter? While over one heart, three no-trump is a real splinter in spades, and three spades the unspecified mini-splinter?
Inspector Gadget, Grand Junction, Colo.
Thank you! I thought this option might be too complex for my readers, but since you raised it, I agree that it makes sense to split your splinters into regular (12-14 or so) and keeping one call for the (9-11) mini-splinter, letting partner relay to find out where your shortage is if he wants to do so. Interested readers can follow up at: http://andrew-gumperz.blogspot.ca/2011/12/splinter-bids-and-some-bidding-theory.html?q=mini-splinter
Would you comment on how to respond to one spade holding ♠ J-8-2, ♥ A-5-3-2, ♦ Q-5-3, ♣ K-9-4? If you would make a limit raise, would your opinion change if the opponents overcalled two of a minor?
Raised Eyebrows, Jackson, Miss.
I would never treat this hand as anything but a constructive raise to two spades in an uncontested auction, and feel even more strongly about that, should the opponents overcall. For the record, make the club four the diamond 10, to give me a potential ruffing value, and I might reconsider…give me the spade 10 as well instead of the two and you’d sell me on the more aggressive action.
|
August 26th, 2017 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Saturday, August 12th, 2017
Things have their due measure; there are ultimately fixed limits, beyond which, or short of which, something must be wrong.
Horace
| S |
North |
| E-W |
♠ A 4
♥ K Q 8 3
♦ A 10 4 3
♣ K 10 7 |
| West |
East |
♠ K Q J 7 3
♥ J 6
♦ Q 9 8 7
♣ Q 6 |
♠ 10 9 6 2
♥ 5 4
♦ 5
♣ J 9 8 5 3 2 |
| South |
♠ 8 5
♥ A 10 9 7 2
♦ K J 6 2
♣ A 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♥ |
1 ♠ |
2 ♠ |
Pass |
| 3 ♦ |
Pass |
3 ♠ |
Pass |
| 4 ♣ |
Pass |
4 NT |
Pass |
| 5 ♥ |
Pass |
5 NT |
Pass |
| 6 ♦ |
Pass |
6 ♥ |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♠K
Your partner has warned you not to bid on, suggesting some defense to spades. Yes, you have five hearts, but your defense is more than adequate, so you should pass – and lead a trump of course. On all these auctions, declarer’s best chance of scrambling tricks normally comes from a cross-ruff.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 8 5
♥ A 10 9 7 2
♦ K J 6 2
♣ A 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
1 ♥ |
1 ♠ |
| 2 ♠ |
4 ♠ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
August 25th, 2017 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Friday, August 11th, 2017
Henceforth I ask not for good fortune, I myself am good fortune.
Walt Whitman
| E |
North |
| E-W |
♠ 8
♥ Q J 9 5 4
♦ A 9 5 3
♣ 8 6 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q 5 3 2
♥ A 6
♦ J 8
♣ A J 7 5 4 |
♠ K J 10 7 4
♥ 7
♦ Q 7 6 4
♣ Q 9 3 |
| South |
♠ A 9 6
♥ K 10 8 3 2
♦ K 10 2
♣ K 10 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
Pass |
| 1 ♥ |
Pass |
4 ♥ |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♠2
If you doubled one spade it would show a penalty double of one heart, but a far more suitable hand for defense. Imagine the same hand with queen-third of spades and a doubleton diamond ace. Your choice appears to be between a pessimistic pass, a raise to two clubs, or an imaginative bid of one no-trump without a stopper. Even a bid of two hearts is possible I suppose. I’ll settle for two clubs.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 8
♥ Q J 9 5 4
♦ A 9 5 3
♣ 8 6 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
1 ♣ |
1 ♥ |
| Pass |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
August 24th, 2017 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Thursday, August 10th, 2017
There’s an entry point to any relationship.
Will.i.am
| S |
North |
| None |
♠ A Q J 8 3
♥ 8 5 2
♦ 8 7 5
♣ Q J |
| West |
East |
♠ 9 7 5 2
♥ Q 7
♦ Q 9 6 4
♣ 8 4 2 |
♠ 4
♥ K 6 4 3
♦ J 2
♣ 10 9 7 6 5 3 |
| South |
♠ K 10 6
♥ A J 10 9
♦ A K 10 3
♣ A K |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 2 ♣ |
Pass |
2 ♦ |
Pass |
| 2 NT |
Pass |
3 ♥ * |
Pass |
| 3 ♠ |
Pass |
5 NT |
Pass |
| 6 ♠ |
All pass |
|
|
*spades
♣2
There are as many points to be won by going plus instead of minus as there are for stretching to a close game – especially at pairs. Here your 10-count has only one redeeming feature, the fifth trump. So pass two spades and try to make it.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A Q J 8 3
♥ 8 5 2
♦ 8 7 5
♣ Q J |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
1 ♦ |
Pass |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
2 ♠ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
August 23rd, 2017 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Wednesday, August 9th, 2017
The demand was for constant action; if you stopped to think, you were lost.
Raymond Chandler
| N |
North |
| None |
♠ A 9 3
♥ K Q 4 3
♦ J 5
♣ K 9 4 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q J 7 6 5 2
♥ 6 2
♦ 8 4
♣ J 7 3 |
♠ K
♥ 10 5
♦ A K 10 9 7 6
♣ A 10 8 6 |
| South |
♠ 10 8 4
♥ A J 9 8 7
♦ Q 3 2
♣ Q 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♣ |
1 ♦ |
| 1 ♥ |
Pass |
2 ♥ |
3 ♦ |
| 3 ♥ |
All pass |
|
|
♦8
The general rule about how high to raise partner in competition is that you can afford to be preempted by one level but not two. Since you planned to raise to two hearts, you can afford to bid three hearts now. Passing (planning to raise hearts the next time – if there is one) would understate your heart support.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A 9 3
♥ K Q 4 3
♦ J 5
♣ K 9 4 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♣ |
Pass |
1 ♥ |
2 ♠ |
| ? |
|
|
|
August 22nd, 2017 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Tuesday, August 8th, 2017
Instruct them how the mind of man becomes A thousand times more beautiful than the earth On which he dwells.
William Wordsworth
| W |
North |
| None |
♠ K Q 7
♥ Q 8
♦ K 8 3 2
♣ J 8 3 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ J 2
♥ A K J 4 2
♦ 10 9 5
♣ K 7 6 |
♠ 10 9
♥ 9 7 5 3
♦ J 7 6 4
♣ A Q 10 |
| South |
♠ A 8 6 5 4 3
♥ 10 6
♦ A Q
♣ 9 5 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♥ |
Pass |
2 ♥ |
| 2 ♠ |
Pass |
3 ♥ |
Pass |
| 3 ♠ |
All pass |
|
|
♥K
Facing a balancing double, you are well within the range for the response of one no-trump. You expect partner to move on with a balanced hand and extras, or to describe his hand by bidding his long suit if he has extra shape. Failing that, one no-trump looks as good a place to play as any.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K Q 7
♥ Q 8
♦ K 8 3 2
♣ J 8 3 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
1 ♣ |
| Pass |
Pass |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
August 21st, 2017 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Monday, August 7th, 2017
I want minimum information given with maximum politeness.
Jackie Kennedy
| S |
North |
| Both |
♠ 7 5 4
♥ K J 2
♦ 7 6 4 3 2
♣ A 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ K Q 10 3
♥ 9 6 5
♦ K 9
♣ Q 10 5 3 |
♠ J 8 2
♥ 8
♦ J 10 8 5
♣ K J 9 7 6 |
| South |
♠ A 9 6
♥ A Q 10 7 4 3
♦ A Q
♣ 8 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♥ |
Pass |
2 ♥ |
Pass |
| 4 ♥ |
All pass |
|
|
♠K
Your partner clearly has a few values, but didn’t raise hearts, so it seems wrong to lead that suit. No lead seems passive, so it is really a question of what lead rates to gain most if you guess right. I’d settle for leading the diamond queen, but you could probably just about sell me on either black suit.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ A 6 5
♥ K J 6 3 2
♦ Q 7
♣ J 8 6 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
Pass |
1 ♣ |
| 1 ♥ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
2 ♠ |
| All pass |
|
|
|
August 20th, 2017 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Sunday, August 6th, 2017
|
You recently commented about the conditions to open one no-trump. This hand below came up in a local game this week. Playing five-card majors and strong no-trump, would you open one no-trump with: ♠ A-J, ♥ A-Q-10-9, ♦ A-4, ♣ 9-6-5-4-3? Would opening a suit and rebidding one no-trump be a significant underbid?
Playing House, Torrance, Calif.
This hand looks like a balanced not an unbalanced hand, because the minor is so weak I don’t want to emphasize it. I am not strong enough to open one club and respond two hearts over one spade, so I would have to rebid one no-trump. I’d opt for that choice with ace-fifth of clubs and the doubleton spade jack, I think, but as it is I’ll open one no-trump.
Not vulnerable, my partner opened one diamond in first seat, followed by two passes and a one heart bid by my Left Hand Opponent. My partner passed, as did my Right Hand Opponent. I then bid two clubs; what should my partner expect of me?
Trying it On, Louisville, Ken.
A good question. I’d say I would expect 4-5 points and long clubs, no diamond fit, unsuitable for bidding a major or 1 NT the first time out. Since most of us WOULD bid one no-trump on any six-count or respond in a major if we had one, a single-suiter seems most likely.
I held ♠ J-10-2,♥ 10, ♦ Q-10-9-8-3, ♣ Q-10-9-8. My partner opened two clubs, followed by a rebid of two no-trump over my two diamond call. I chose to bid Stayman, and raised his three spades to four. It turned out he had ace-jack-third of hearts and because the club king was finessable, you could make 12 tricks in either contract. How would you have bid my hand?
Howdy Doody, Northridge, Calif.
When partner has a very strong hand and we only have regular Stayman available, I guess I’d just blast three no-trump. Let me add a suggestion. Even if you play regular Stayman, you can use a response of three no-trump to Stayman as five spades – what do you have to lose, since it has no other meaning in the standard scheme of responses?
|
We had a pre-game seminar at our club last week and this deal came up. With ♠ A-10-8, ♥ A-Q-J-9-2, ♦ Q-5, ♣ K-Q-10, what would be your plan facing a one club opener? (Partner’s opener is a dead minimum, but his hand includes five decent clubs plus the heart king and diamond ace; so 12 tricks are easy in three strains – though not 13.)
Flummoxed, Cartersville, Ga.
This is a hard hand – but it exemplifies why we play strong jumps shifts. After one club – two hearts – two no-trump – three no-trump responder has shown an 18-count with five hearts. If opener can find one further call (maybe four clubs or four hearts) you should achieve your target.
My partner introduced me to an odd-sounding concept, and I need help. Can you discuss what ‘Unusual against Unusual’ means and how it applies?
Old Sparky, New Canaan, Conn.
When the opponents show a specific two-suiter, (by bidding two no-trump over partner’s one heart, say) use the three club and three diamond cuebid to show two different hand types. One is a limit raise in hearts, one is a spade hand – typically one plays this as better than a direct three spade call, which would show a non-forcing hand. You can link clubs and hearts together, and diamonds to spades. Alternatively, you can make the higher cuebid – if it is below three of partner’s suit – as the limit raise. Whatever you do, make sure you agree it!
|
August 19th, 2017 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Saturday, August 5th, 2017
Histories makes men wise; poets, witty; the mathematics subtle; natural philosophy deep; moral grave; logic and rhetoric, able to contend.
Francis Bacon
| S |
North |
| Both |
♠ A 10 3
♥ K 8 2
♦ K 10 5 2
♣ K 7 5 |
| West |
East |
♠ J 8 7 6 5
♥ Q 9 6 3
♦ —
♣ 10 9 8 6 |
♠ Q 9
♥ J 10 5 4
♦ J 9 6 4
♣ 4 3 2 |
| South |
♠ K 4 2
♥ A 7
♦ A Q 8 7 3
♣ A Q J |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 2 NT |
Pass |
6 NT |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♣10
With a weak hand and no fit for diamonds, the question is whether to try to improve the contract or settle for a possibly inferior contract in order to stay low. If I could introduce a second suit economically, I might do so, but here passing two diamonds could be very ugly. I’ll risk rebidding two spades, and take the blame if I’m wrong.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ J 8 7 6 5
♥ Q 9 6 3
♦ —
♣ 10 9 8 6 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♥ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
2 ♦ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
August 18th, 2017 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Friday, August 4th, 2017
As scarce as truth is, the supply has always been in excess of the demand.
Josh Billings
| S |
North |
| Both |
♠ 9 7 5
♥ A J 9 8 7 5
♦ A K
♣ 7 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ K Q 8 4
♥ 10 3
♦ 8 5 4
♣ K 10 5 4 |
♠ 6 3 2
♥ Q
♦ 10 9 6 3 2
♣ Q 9 8 6 |
| South |
♠ A J 10
♥ K 6 4 2
♦ Q J 7
♣ A J 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
2 ♦ * |
Pass |
| 3 ♥ |
Pass |
4 ♦ |
Pass |
| 4 ♠ |
Pass |
5 ♦ |
Pass |
| 6 ♥ |
All pass |
|
|
*hearts
♥3
The redouble on this sequence suggests playing in two clubs redoubled. Even though you have great controls, are you prepared to play a 4-2 (or possibly 3-2) fit? Since your partner might have opened one club with four and a decent suit – given that we know his diamonds are clearly weak. I’d just bid two hearts, I think, which is natural and forcing after using fourth suit.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 9 7 5
♥ A J 9 8 7 5
♦ A K
♣ 7 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♦ |
Pass |
| 1 ♥ |
Pass |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
| 2 ♣ |
Dbl. |
Rdbl. |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
|
When South hears his partner cuebid two spades, initially a game try, he temporizes with three diamonds. After one more cuebid from South, North takes control with Blackwood, then bids five no-trump to indicate possession of all the key cards and trump queen, and eventually settles for the small slam.
After the lead of the spade king to the ace, declarer draws trump with the heart king and ace. Now before testing diamonds, he takes the club ace and king, and ruffs a club in hand. On this trick West discards a spade, suggesting he rates to hold at least three diamonds. So declarer cashes the diamond king, and leads a diamond to the 10. When East discards, South exits with a spade. West can win, but is faced with a choice of ways to surrender the 12th trick, either in the form of a ruff-and-discard or a diamond lead into the tenace.
If declarer had played the hand in more simple fashion, just exiting in spades after eliminating the trumps and clubs (as many people would), then he would have survived if West had taken the second spade. Then, if West led a diamond from the queen, the diamond loser would vanish, while if he gave a ruffand-discard, South could ditch one diamond and still be on the diamond guess.
However, the defense would prevail if East could win the spade exit and lead a diamond. West can simply cover declarer’s card and collect a diamond winner at the end, whatever declarer does.