September 19th, 2017 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Tuesday, September 5th, 2017
Human speech is like a cracked kettle on which we tap rhythms for bears to dance to.
Gustave Flaubert
| S |
North |
| Both |
♠ J 10 7 5 4
♥ 6 4 2
♦ Q 6 4
♣ K 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ A Q 9
♥ 10
♦ 10 5 3 2
♣ Q J 10 9 7 |
♠ K 8 3 2
♥ 8 7 5
♦ K J 8 7
♣ 5 2 |
| South |
♠ 6
♥ A K Q J 9 3
♦ A 9
♣ A 8 6 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♥ |
Pass |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
| 3 ♣ |
Pass |
3 ♥ |
Pass |
| 4 ♥ |
All pass |
|
|
♣Q
You have a stark choice here. Pass the two no-trump opening bid or transfer into spades, after which you can pass, or offer a choice of games with a call of three no-trump. I prefer to start with a transfer, but I would plan to pass the completion of the transfer. This doesn’t have to be right, however since partner can always break the transfer with a super fit, I’ll settle for partscore if he doesn’t.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ J 10 7 5 4
♥ 6 4 2
♦ Q 6 4
♣ 8 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
2 NT |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
September 18th, 2017 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Monday, September 4th, 2017
In formal logic, a contradiction is the signal of defeat, but in the evolution of real knowledge it marks the first step in progress toward a victory.
Alfred North Whitehead
| W |
North |
| Both |
♠ A Q 4 3
♥ K 4 2
♦ Q 7 5
♣ Q 7 5 |
| West |
East |
♠ 8 6 5
♥ 8
♦ J 10 6 4 2
♣ J 10 9 4 |
♠ 9
♥ A J 9 7 6 5
♦ A 9 3
♣ 8 6 3 |
| South |
♠ K J 10 7 2
♥ Q 10 3
♦ K 8
♣ A K 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
1 ♣ |
1 ♥ |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
2 ♠ |
Pass |
| 4 ♠ |
All pass |
|
|
♥8
Partner has scattered values but has not joined in, so we can assume no heart fit. Is that enough reason to lead a different suit? I think so. The spade sequence is just enough reason to lead that suit, particularly because your RHO might well have bid spades if he had the right hand with a three-card suit. So I would lead the spade jack.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ J 10 8
♥ A J 7 4 3
♦ K 5
♣ J 9 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
Pass |
1 ♣ |
| 1 ♥ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
1 NT |
| All pass |
|
|
|
September 17th, 2017 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Sunday, September 3rd, 2017
|
My partner has proposed we play Rosenkranz doubles to distinguish between hands on which advancer (overcaller’s partner) can raise his partner’s suit without a top honor, but can show a raise with a top honor by a double – or possibly a redouble. Where do you stand here?
Red Cross, Cedar Rapids, Iowa
I prefer to utilize the double to show a strong defensive hand rather than for a fit. These doubles are traditionally only used by fourth hand facing an overcall, and I can see the logic in using them in the way you describe if by a passed hand – but I would not advocate them in any other sequences.
Holding ♠ A-J-7-4-2, ♥ K-9-7, ♦ A-Q-9-7, ♣ 10, I opened one spade and heard my LHO overcall two clubs. My partner passed, but I felt he had broken tempo slightly before acting. When this came back to me what are my responsibilities in terms of passing bidding or doubling? For the record, my partner had a six-count with the shape for a negative double but only a singleton spade; so we could make three in either red suit.
At the Table, White Plains, N.Y.
You were very ethical to consider this a problem. Many people would process the break subconsciously but not admit to it. Here, if you have what you consider a clear action (one to which there is no logical alternative) take it. In my opinion, doubling for take-out is that clear… change the diamond seven to the club seven and some would pass, so you may feel obliged to do so. I’d never bid two diamonds as opposed to doubling, by the way.
When opener hears his partner make a negative double, is a jump in a new suit forcing or invitational? If partner had responded, that jump would have been game forcing, right?
Raising the Roof, Raleigh, N.C.
When your partner asks you to bid a suit with a negative double, all minimum actions show that suit but deny extra values. A jump to the three-level simply says that you have the appropriate suit(s) and extra values, while jumping to two of a major after opening a minor and hearing a negative double of a red suit promises no more than the equivalent of raising a major shown by partner. With forcing hands, start with a cuebid or a more extravagant leap than a simple jump.
|
Could you please elaborate on a complete structure over an opening bid of two no-trump? I’m assuming Stayman, and transfers to the majors at the three- and four-level.
Patterning Out, Madison, Wis.
A raise to three no-trump is to play, of course, with regular Stayman, transfers and Texas transfers to the majors. You can play a jump to four spades and four no-trump both as quantitative, the former suggesting both minors 4-4. Next week, I’ll answer the question as to how to show one or both minors. But with a four-card major and a longer minor start with Stayman, then either agree the major if appropriate, or bid the minor if not.
How would you evaluate this hand, playing at Board-a-Match teams? My partner held ♠ A-10-4-3, ♥ 10-8-2, ♦ 9-7-4, ♣ K-9-2 and responded one spade to one club. The next hand overcalled two diamonds, and I jumped to three spades. What would you do now? (My partner passed, but I had a 4-4-1-4 15-count with the king-queen of spades and the top hearts. Game needed only a mildly favorable lie of the clubs to come home.)
Swing Low, Holland, Mich.
My calculation is that after spades broke you might well have needed either hearts or clubs to behave well to come to 10 tricks – consider the effect of repeated diamond leads to see that. As far as I can see, both players did exactly the right thing; you were well short of a drive to game, your partner took account of the fact that in competition you may have had to shade your jump raise.
|
September 16th, 2017 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Saturday, September 2nd, 2017
The difference between false memories and true ones is the same as for jewels: it is always the false ones that look the most real, the most brilliant.
Salvador Dali
| N |
North |
| N-S |
♠ A Q 5
♥ 8 5
♦ K Q 8 3
♣ Q 8 6 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ 10 8 3 2
♥ 9 4 2
♦ A 9 7 4
♣ J 9 |
♠ J 9 4
♥ K Q J 6 3
♦ 10 6 5
♣ K 2 |
| South |
♠ K 7 6
♥ A 10 7
♦ J 2
♣ A 10 7 5 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♣ |
1 ♥ |
| 3 NT |
All pass |
|
|
♥2
Your partner’s double is responsive – it applies after the raise of opener’s suit but not after a new suit bid by your LHO. It is for take-out, but the double of a heart call tends to deny spades, since your partner would bid them if he had them. You should simply bid your cheaper, not stronger, minor. So bid three clubs.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A Q 5
♥ 8 5
♦ K Q 8 3
♣ Q 8 6 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
1 ♥ |
| Dbl. |
2 ♥ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
September 15th, 2017 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Friday, September 1st, 2017
But since we are all likely to go astray, The reasonable thing is to learn from those who can teach.
Sophocles
| W |
North |
| N-S |
♠ A J 8 5 3
♥ A Q 6
♦ K Q
♣ A 6 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ K Q
♥ 9
♦ 10 7 4 2
♣ K J 10 5 4 3 |
♠ 9 7 6 2
♥ K 10 8 7 5
♦ J 6
♣ 9 8 |
| South |
♠ 10 4
♥ J 4 3 2
♦ A 9 8 5 3
♣ Q 7 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
3 ♣ |
Dbl. |
4 ♣ |
| 4 ♥ |
All pass |
|
|
♣J
However good your diamond fit might be, you should simply raise to three no-trump without looking for the minor suit game. With no singletons, you would be aiming at too small a target to assume that any game but no-trump would be right. If partner had really short hearts (when diamonds might play better) he would surely not have chosen to jump in no-trump but would have bid a second suit.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 10 4
♥ J 4 3 2
♦ A 9 8 5 3
♣ Q 7 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
1 ♦ |
Pass |
| 1 ♥ |
Dbl. |
2 NT |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
September 14th, 2017 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Thursday, August 31st, 2017
Pride is a tricky, glorious, double-edged feeling.
Adrienne Rich
| E |
North |
| E-W |
♠ A K J 3
♥ K 9
♦ 8 7 5 3
♣ 9 6 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ 10 4
♥ Q 7 6 2
♦ Q J 9 2
♣ K J 5 |
♠ Q 9 8 7 6 2
♥ 3
♦ 10
♣ A Q 10 7 2 |
| South |
♠ 5
♥ A J 10 8 5 4
♦ A K 6 4
♣ 8 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
2 ♠ |
| 3 ♥ |
Pass |
4 ♥ |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♠10
Not every minimum 6-4 hand is governed by the same principles, but I do have strong opinions about this specific hand. Where you can bid both your suits, and your four-card suit is strong (at least two top honors, or one top honor and good intermediates) bid your second suit and show nine of your cards, not six.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 5
♥ A J 10 8 5 4
♦ A K 6 4
♣ 8 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♥ |
Pass |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
September 13th, 2017 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Wednesday, August 30th, 2017
Curses are like young chickens, they always come home to roost.
Robert Southey
| W |
North |
| None |
♠ A K J 8
♥ A
♦ K Q 7 6 4 2
♣ 8 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ 10 6 2
♥ Q 10 7 5 2
♦ A 10 3
♣ A 7 |
♠ 9 4
♥ K J 8 4
♦ J 5
♣ K Q J 9 4 |
| South |
♠ Q 7 5 3
♥ 9 6 3
♦ 9 8
♣ 10 6 5 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♥ |
2 ♦ |
4 ♥ |
| Pass |
Pass |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| 4 ♠ |
All pass |
|
|
♣A
No one could blame you for passing with a two-count here. But in context you have enough (or almost enough) to compete to three clubs now. The doubleton diamond, four trumps and a queen that is likely to contribute something to the cause may not be much – but your partner has already shown a full reverse by competing facing a passing partner.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 7 5 3
♥ 9 6 3
♦ 9 8
♣ 10 6 5 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
1 ♣ |
Dbl. |
| Pass |
1 ♥ |
2 ♦ |
2 ♥ |
| ? |
|
|
|
September 12th, 2017 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Tuesday, August 29th, 2017
In the rotation of crops there was a recognized season for wild oats; but they were not sown more than once.
Edith Wharton
| S |
North |
| E-W |
♠ K 5 2
♥ A Q 9
♦ Q 7 3
♣ K Q 8 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q J 10 3
♥ 6 3
♦ 10 9 6 4
♣ J 6 5 |
♠ A 9 8 7
♥ 7 5 4
♦ J 8
♣ A 10 9 3 |
| South |
♠ 6 4
♥ K J 10 8 2
♦ A K 5 2
♣ 7 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♥ |
Pass |
2 ♣ |
Pass |
| 2 ♦ |
Pass |
3 ♥ |
Pass |
| 4 ♥ |
All pass |
|
|
♠Q
If you do not play any conventions in this sequence, redoubling then raising hearts is the best way to show these values. However, one of Marty Bergen’s most useful ideas was to play that one or both of the minor-suit responses after the double of a major should be subverted for a constructive major-suit raise. For more details see https://www.larryco.com/bridge-articles/optional-upgrades.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A 9 8 7
♥ 7 5 4
♦ J 8
♣ A 10 9 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
1 ♥ |
Dbl. |
| ? |
|
|
|
September 11th, 2017 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Monday, August 28th, 2017
PERIPATETIC, adj. Walking about. Relating to the philosophy of Aristotle, who, while expounding it, moved from place to place in order to avoid his pupil’s objections. A needless precaution — they knew no more of the matter than he.
Ambrose Bierce
| N |
North |
|
♠ Q J 6 4 3
♥ 10 3 2
♦ Q 6
♣ 4 3 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ K 9 5
♥ —
♦ J 10 9 8 4 2
♣ 10 8 7 6 |
♠ 7 2
♥ K Q 4
♦ A K 7 5
♣ J 9 5 |
| South |
♠ A 10 8
♥ A J 9 8 7 6 5
♦ —
♣ A K Q |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
Pass |
1 ♦ |
| 2 ♦ |
5 ♦ |
Pass |
Pass |
| 5 ♥ |
All pass |
|
|
♦J
Declarer rates to have three hearts and a semi balanced hand – surely with both minors. So his shortage rates to be spades, and my best guess would be to lead that suit. When in doubt, leading declarer’s shortage at no-trump is not a bad idea.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 6 2
♥ J 9 4
♦ Q 5 3 2
♣ A 6 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
Pass |
1 ♦ |
| Pass |
1 ♥ |
Pass |
2 ♥ |
| Pass |
2 ♠ |
Pass |
2 NT |
| Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
|
September 10th, 2017 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Sunday, August 27th, 2017
|
After some overbidding, you reach a contract where you need to play your nine-card fit for no losers. In dummy you have ace-jack-sixth and queen-third in hand. You are missing the nine and 10 but have the eight. What play gives declarer the best chance of playing the suit if there are no entry problems? And how should you play the suit for one loser?
Bob’s Your Uncle, East Rutherford, N.J.
You must finesse the jack then cash the ace. Of the potentially winning distributions, you lose only to the bare king offside. Give yourself the nine and you would probably play the same way unless the hand over the ace had suggested shortness in this suit, when you might run the queen then repeat the finesse if the queen was covered. Incidentally, you should run the queen if you can afford one loser – that lets you play the suit for one loser against one of the 4-0 splits.
On an unopposed auction you hear RHO bid one spade, LHO bids two diamonds, then raises two no-trump to three. Holding ♠ J-9, ♥ K-6-5-3, ♦ 10-4-2, ♣ Q-5-4-2 which suit is better to lead and why? Is there a preference or a general guideline for leading away from a king or a queen?
First Footer, Edmonton, Alberta
I think there is a slight edge for leading the unbid major no matter which way round your honors are. The logic is that declarer surely won’t hold hearts, and dummy is not favorite to do so. Meanwhile either declarer or dummy could hold four clubs, even if neither hand is especially favorite to do so. In abstract, there is really nothing to choose between the two holdings – the better the intermediates, the more attractive the lead.
If you lowered your opening bid standards to open one diamond with the following hand, what would you rebid over the response of a major suit? ♠ A-10, ♥ J-3, ♦ K-J-73-2, ♣ K-9-5-3, and would it matter whether partner bid hearts or spades as to what you did next?
Rear Gunner, Columbia, S.C.
This hand is a perfectly respectable opening bid, I believe. I hew to Terence Reese’s dictum that 5422 is a hand more appropriate for suit play than no-trump, and rebidding two clubs does not in any way suggest extras. Having said that, bidding 1 NT over a one heart response is not even a misdemeanor, whereas doing so over one spade might be a felony.
|
Recently in your column you recommended passing on a decent hand with a minimum opening bid, with four spades and four clubs, after hearing one diamond to your left and one heart to your right. You suggested doubling two of either red suit on the second round at your next turn. If the double stands, and the opponents make two hearts, won’t that finish up much worse for you?
Doppelganger, Eau Claire, Wis.
Double would not be for penalty here. When the opponents have agreed a suit at a low level, double should be for take-out. In fact I play almost no penalty doubles facing a passing partner (and especially when the opponents have implicitly or explicitly agreed a suit).
With both sides vulnerable, would you overcall one spade with ♠ 10-9-8-7-2, ♥ Q-2, ♦ K-3, ♣ K-Q-9-4? The hand and suit seem too weak to me; but if you agree, where does the threshold move from unacceptable to marginal?
Taxi Driver, Olympia, Wash.
This does not look like an overcall to me though I would balance with this hand happily enough. If you put a gun to my head, I would overcall one spade if the heart queen were the king. And of course my standards decline a little if non-vulnerable, maybe to a point where I would act with our example hand – even if I didn’t advocate that action for others.
|
|
Goldilocks has now completed her training at bridge, and has advanced to competing at the duplicate. Papa Bear expansively invited her to play with him, “So she could see how the experts play.” Keeping her doubts under firm check, Goldilocks accepted with as much grace as she could, and was privileged to watch him get his paws on the dummy, often with singular lack of success. In four hearts, he won the opening club lead in dummy, led a club to the ace, and tried to ruff a club in dummy. East over-ruffed and led a spade to his partner. A fourth club sank the contract without trace, when East could over-ruff.
Mama Bear improved on that line at her table. She won the club lead in dummy to lead a club to her hand, then ducked a spade to cut the defenders’ communications for immediate ruffs. Now when a third club came through she ruffed in dummy and was over-ruffed, but she was still in decent shape. She would have survived had trumps broken, or had East held a singleton. But not today.
Baby Bear showed how it should be done. The club queen went to the king, and he next led to the club ace. Now came a third club, throwing a diamond from dummy. When West led a fourth club, declarer threw a second diamond, rather than ruff.
West shifted to a diamond, and declarer won in hand, drew two rounds of trump and ruffed his diamond loser in dummy for his 10th trick.