May 8th, 2017 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Monday, April 24th, 2017
There’s a good time coming boys, A good time coming.
Charles Mackay
| S |
North |
| Both |
♠ 9 7 3
♥ 8 7 6
♦ A Q 5
♣ 8 7 6 5 |
| West |
East |
♠ 4
♥ Q J 10 5
♦ 9 8 4 2
♣ J 10 4 3 |
♠ J 10 8 5
♥ 9 3 2
♦ J 10 6
♣ Q 9 2 |
| South |
♠ A K Q 6 2
♥ A K 4
♦ K 7 3
♣ A K |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 2 ♣ |
Pass |
2 ♦ |
Pass |
| 2 ♠ |
Pass |
3 ♠ |
Pass |
| 4 ♣ |
Pass |
4 ♦ |
Pass |
| 4 ♥ |
Pass |
4 ♠ |
Pass |
| 5 ♣ |
Pass |
5 ♠ |
Pass |
| 6 ♠ |
All pass |
|
|
♥Q
When you are dealt a sequence on lead, do you go for it or lead partner’s suit? Put me down in favor of a club, though I admit it is close. Since partner’s opening suit may be relatively short (or weak) I feel I should go with what is in front of me. Partnership discipline comes second.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ 10 4 3 2
♥ Q 4
♦ 10 6 3
♣ Q J 9 8 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♦ |
1 ♥ |
| Pass |
2 ♥ |
All pass |
|
May 7th, 2017 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Sunday, April 23rd, 2017
|
I held five clubs to the ace-king-jack and four hearts to the queen-jack, with two small doubletons, and heard my partner open one diamond. I elected to respond two clubs and when my partner raised to three clubs I tried three hearts — and played there! Did I do something wrong? And should I have responded one heart or two clubs initially?
Polar Vortex, Harrisburg, Pa.
You did nothing wrong here. New suits by responder are absolutely forcing and here three hearts showed hearts (typically four) and a game-forcing hand looking for no-trump, hearts, or a reversion to clubs. Incidentally, unless playing two over one, passing three clubs on your hand would also have been possible. If unwilling to risk forcing to game here, an initial response of one heart would also be possible, but I prefer your route with such concentrated values.
Just recently I read a deal where a player as a passed hand responded two clubs to one heart with a singleton club and nine points. Do people use this call as a cue-bid after passing?
Gold Rush, Little Rock, Ark.
The response of two clubs is part of a popular convention called Drury. As a passed hand in response to a major-suit opening in third or fourth seat, you play one no-trump as natural, a simple raise as five to nine HCP, and give up the call of two clubs as natural. Instead it shows a maximum pass with three or four trump in support.
Somebody told me that there was a top bridge player who had won a Nobel Prize. Is this true?
Mary Poppins, Albany, Ga.
Until recently the closest I knew that bridge players had got to a Nobel prize winner were Jan Martel and the late Henry Bethe, children of Milton Friedman and Hans Bethe respectively. However, Icelander Magnus Olafsson was part of the Nobel peace-prize winning U.N. team a decade ago. He now lives in New York and has taken up the game seriously again.
|
My partner opened one spade and I held ♠ K-10-2, ♥ Q-2, ♦ K-6, ♣ A-Q-J-7-3-2. Playing two over one I responded two clubs and rebid two spades over his call of two diamonds. Now he jumped to four clubs, and I was unable to guess what he might have for this action. Is there a logical way to deduce what he was showing?
Guessing Game, Woodland Hills, Calif.
Your partner cannot have four clubs or he would raise at once, and he cannot have three clubs or he would support at the three-level instead of jumping now. So, unlikely as it might be, perhaps he has a club void, setting spades as trump. I think I have just enough to bid four diamonds as a cuebid with the idea of letting partner make all the running from here on in.
With: ♠ K-J-10-7-3, ♥ Q-2, ♦ A-10-6-4, ♣ Q-2 I assume you would open one spade and rebid two spades over a response of two hearts. What should you do over a three club continuation — would you raise hearts or bid no-trump?
Selfish Giant, Bremerton, Wash.
I would suggest a different answer to the ones you propose. Here three no-trump seems wrong with such good hearts, but raising hearts might persuade partner I have three. I prefer to bid three diamonds, the fourth suit, suggesting doubt as to where we belong. I’ll raise my partner’s hearts if he rebids them, bid three no-trump over a three spade call, and pass a three no-trump bid.
|
May 6th, 2017 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Saturday, April 22nd, 2017
Don’t be fooled by the rocks that I got, I’m still, I’m still Jenny from the block.
Jennifer Lopez et al
| S |
North |
| Both |
♠ A Q J 10 9 8
♥ 6 3 2
♦ A
♣ K 10 5 |
| West |
East |
♠ 6 4
♥ A J 8 7 5
♦ 9 7
♣ J 9 6 3 |
♠ K 7 5 2
♥ Q 10 9
♦ J 6 5
♣ 8 7 4 |
| South |
♠ 3
♥ K 4
♦ K Q 10 8 4 3 2
♣ A Q 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♦ |
1 ♥ |
1 ♠ |
2 ♥ |
| 3 ♦ |
Pass |
3 ♥ |
Pass |
| 3 NT |
Pass |
4 NT |
Pass |
| 6 ♦ |
All pass |
|
|
♣3
Are you worth bidding on to three clubs in competition? This is not a simple question to answer, since my instincts tell me it is right to bid but partner will hope for, or even expect, more. I will bid three clubs, but I’m certainly conflicted about it.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 6 4
♥ A J 8 7 5
♦ 9 7
♣ J 9 6 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♦ |
Pass |
| 1 ♥ |
1 ♠ |
2 ♣ |
2 ♠ |
| ? |
|
|
|
May 5th, 2017 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Friday, April 21st, 2017
If… the past may be no Rule for the future, all Experience becomes useless and can give rise to no Inferences or Conclusions.
David Hume
| N |
North |
| N-S |
♠ J 8 2
♥ Q 6 3
♦ K J 7 6
♣ 9 5 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ A K 7 5 4
♥ J 7 2
♦ 2
♣ J 7 4 2 |
♠ Q 10 9 6
♥ A 9 5 4
♦ 10 4
♣ A 10 8 |
| South |
♠ 3
♥ K 10 8
♦ A Q 9 8 5 3
♣ K Q 6 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
Pass |
Pass |
| 1 ♦ |
1 ♠ |
2 ♦ |
3 ♦ |
| 4 ♦ |
All pass |
|
|
♠K
The double followed by cuebid shows a really good hand asking for more information. In context you now have enough to expect game to make. But without a four-card major and a club stopper, the route forward isn’t clear. I would return the favor to my partner by cuebidding three clubs, hoping partner can provide us with a direction as to which game to head towards.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ J 8 2
♥ Q 6 3
♦ K J 7 6
♣ 9 5 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♣ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| 1 ♦ |
Pass |
2 ♣ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
May 4th, 2017 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Thursday, April 20th, 2017
Human kind Cannot bear very much reality.
T. S. Eliot
| N |
North |
| None |
♠ Q 10 6
♥ J 6 3
♦ K Q 10 9
♣ A 10 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ 3
♥ Q 10 8 5 4 2
♦ 6 5 4 3
♣ 8 7 |
♠ K 8 4
♥ A 9
♦ A J
♣ K J 9 6 4 2 |
| South |
♠ A J 9 7 5 2
♥ K 7
♦ 8 7 2
♣ Q 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♦ |
2 ♣ |
| 2 ♠ |
Pass |
3 ♠ |
Pass |
| 4 ♠ |
All pass |
|
|
♣8
The action on this hand is somewhat dependent on vulnerability. I think there is a reasonable case for saying that in second seat at all but favorable vulnerability this is a maximum weak two bid; but that it would be just too strong in that instance. Some would say that it qualifies at the fourth vulnerability too. I can live with that, but suggest you and your partner agree which side of the line it falls.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A J 9 7 5 2
♥ K 7
♦ 8 7 2
♣ Q 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
May 3rd, 2017 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Wednesday, April 19th, 2017
Oh I get by with a little help from my friends.
Lennon and McCartney
| S |
North |
| E-W |
♠ A 8 5 4
♥ K 4 3
♦ A 9
♣ A 10 7 6 |
| West |
East |
♠ K Q 3
♥ A 10 5
♦ K 6 3 2
♣ Q 9 5 |
♠ 6 2
♥ Q 9 8 7 6
♦ J 8 5
♣ J 8 3 |
| South |
♠ J 10 9 7
♥ J 2
♦ Q 10 7 4
♣ K 4 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| Pass |
1 ♦ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
2 ♠ |
Pass |
| 2 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♣5
This sequence shows game-forcing values and clubs, typically with four hearts. Your controls are so excellent I would bypass three no-trump and raise to four clubs, treating this hand as a maximum because of the aces. Let partner make the running from here on in.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A 8 5 4
♥ K 4 3
♦ A 9
♣ A 10 7 6 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
2 ♣ |
Pass |
| 2 ♠ |
Pass |
3 ♣ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
May 2nd, 2017 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Tuesday, April 18th, 2017
Be always sure you are right — then go ahead.
Davy Crockett
| E |
North |
| E-W |
♠ 9
♥ J 10 9 8
♦ K 8 3
♣ J 8 7 6 5 |
| West |
East |
♠ K 10 7 6 5 3 2
♥ A 6 2
♦ J 6 2
♣ — |
♠ A 8
♥ Q 7 3
♦ 10 9 7 5 4
♣ Q 9 4 |
| South |
♠ Q J 4
♥ K 5 4
♦ A Q
♣ A K 10 3 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
Pass |
| 1 ♣ |
3 ♠ |
Pass |
Pass |
| 3 NT |
All pass |
|
|
♥2
You are relatively unlikely to make game, and your own assets suggest the opponents won’t make more than partscore. But if you pass, will your partner struggle in one spade when another spot would have been easier? Or will the opponents make something when you could have stolen the contract by bidding? I guess I’d pass, for fear bidding takes our side way overboard in spades.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 9
♥ J 10 9 8
♦ K 8 3
♣ J 8 7 6 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♠ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
May 1st, 2017 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Monday, April 17th, 2017
For when the One Great Scorer comes, To write against your name He marks – not that you won or lost – But how you played the game.
Grantland Rice
| S |
North |
| E-W |
♠ J 9
♥ A K 10 9 8 2
♦ 6
♣ A J 10 9 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q 7 6
♥ 7 6 4 3
♦ A K 10 4 2
♣ K |
♠ 8 4
♥ Q
♦ J 9 8 7 3
♣ 8 7 5 3 2 |
| South |
♠ A K 10 5 3 2
♥ J 5
♦ Q 5
♣ Q 6 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♠ |
2 ♦ |
2 ♥ |
3 ♦ |
| 3 ♠ |
Pass |
4 ♠ |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♦K
Few of us are sufficiently gifted with psychic talent to think we might guess the killing lead here. Since all four suits could be right, let’s play the percentages and find the lead that combines a reasonable degree of safety with being as likely as anything to hit partner. For me, that is the diamond jack, which may avoid costing a trick when it is wrong.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ J 6 5
♥ Q 9 2
♦ J 10 8
♣ K 8 3 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
1 NT |
| Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
|
April 30th, 2017 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Sunday, April 16th, 2017
|
I’m unclear as to the best matchpoint strategy about inviting game facing a no-trump opener. I think I understand that it is right to have full values to invite when balanced – but what about with a shapely hand? Recently after transferring to spades with ♠ A-6-5-4-2, ♥ 10-3 ♦ K-10-9-3-2, ♣ 2, I decided it was best to pass when my partner did not break the transfer. The best game for us was five diamonds when my partner had a doubleton spade king, but even the spade game came home today.
Patrick Thistle, Schaumburg, Ill.
My general approach here is to transfer to spades and bid two no-trump with balanced hands, but to make a light invitation with five spades in an unbalanced hand via Stayman then two spades over a red suit. That might not help here, I admit but at least I can differentiate my invitations.
I know you are not an especial fan of Bergen Raises, but if playing semi-forcing no-trump would you consider using a direct jump to three clubs as an invitational three-card spade raise? A three diamond call could be four trump, or some other kind of invitational hand.
Thoroughly Modern Mindy, Elmira, N.Y.
For me simplest is best. I don’t mind playing forcing or semi-forcing no-trump, and even if using the latter I can put balanced invitations with three trump through this response. If I end up in one no-trump facing a minimum balanced hand, it might be our last (or best) plus score. Three level jumps are thus natural and invitational.
You recently suggested that a reader might raise his partner’s opening one spade bid to three no-trump as a good raise to four spades. Might not opener pass expecting a balanced hand without spade support?
Jimbo in Limbo, Kenosha, Wis.
I was suggesting using the three no-trump call as purely artificial, not a suggestion of a place to play. It can be used to show a spade raise with less than the minimum for a Jacoby two no-trump response, but still with enough shape to want to play game. Shading the Jacoby response can lead to problems when opener tries for slam expecting more values opposite. The three no-trump call can either be used as a shapely raise to game or, if you prefer, as a splinter in an unspecified suit instead. If the latter, partner can relay to find out if interested.
|
When bidding in sandwich seat I’m often confused about whether to overcall, double or bid one no-trump if I hold a strong hand. Recently with ♠ K-9-2, ♥ A-J, ♦ A-J-9-6-4, ♣ K-10-3 I was not even sure if I should come into my opponents’ auction at all, after hearing one club on my left, and one heart to my right. What would you bid?
Duke of Earl, Charlottesville, Va.
I would bid here, but the choice between overcalling, doubling, and bidding one no-trump is indeed a close one. Your high-cards make it relatively safe to double, a little less safe to bid one no-trump or two diamonds, since you can more easily get doubled for penalty. I suppose my extra values make it right to double now.
Are there any major contributions to bidding theory in the last 20 years – or has everything that could be found out about the game already been published?
Novelty Hunter, Grand Forks, N.D.
The modern tendency at expert level to use transfer responses to a natural but potentially short club is undeniably interesting. I’m also particularly taken with the idea that the call of two no-trump can be used in competition as either a raise or a purely competitive call (to distinguish it from invitational hands). See http://webpages.mcgill.ca/staff/group3/gberns/world/new%20bridge%20site/myweb4/Articles/Competitive%20Bidding/Good%20Bad%202NT.pdf
|
April 29th, 2017 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Saturday, April 15th, 2017
Render unto Caesar the things that are Caesar’s, and unto God the things that are God’s.
New Testament
| S |
North |
| Both |
♠ K 6 5
♥ 7 4 3
♦ A K J 6 2
♣ Q J |
| West |
East |
♠ J 9 8 4
♥ A K 10 2
♦ 8 5
♣ K 7 6 |
♠ 2
♥ J 9 8 6
♦ 9 7 3
♣ 10 9 4 3 2 |
| South |
♠ A Q 10 7 3
♥ Q 5
♦ Q 10 4
♣ A 8 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
2 ♦ |
Pass |
| 2 ♠ |
Pass |
4 ♠ |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♥K
Your honors may not be pulling their full weight, but there is no reason to assume that West must hold both the missing club honors. Start by cuebidding two clubs, and even if your partner signs off, you will be worth at least one further try for game.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K 6 5
♥ 7 4 3
♦ A K J 6 2
♣ Q J |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♣ |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
|
In today’s deal a complex auction sees you flirting with a grand slam before settling for 12 tricks. You win the lead of the heart queen and test trumps; bad news!
It may seem you cannot now avoid losing both a trump and a diamond. But an alternative perspective may help: you actually have seven winners in the side suits. If you can manage to single in all five of your trumps in hand, that will add up to 12.
Start by cashing your three top trumps, then take your second heart winner, followed by the two top clubs. Next you play the king and ace of diamonds (of course if East can ruff any of these winners you will go down like a stone, but luck is with you so far). The time has come to start scoring your low trumps. So you ruff a club low, then cross your fingers and return to dummy with the diamond queen. When East follows suit, you are home.
The last two cards in your hand are the spade six and a heart loser. When you lead the fourth club from dummy, East can either ruff with his master trump, letting you discard your heart loser and score your trump at trick 13, or discard at trick 12 and let you ruff the club with your last trump. Contract made!
For this line to succeed, you need East to hold at least three diamonds, two hearts and two clubs, and to be unable to discard from a three-card diamond suit on the third club.