April 11th, 2017 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Tuesday, March 28th, 2017
(When asked why numbers are beautiful). It’s like asking why is Ludwig van Beethoven’s Ninth Symphony beautiful. If you don’t see why, someone can’t tell you. I know numbers are beautiful. If they aren’t beautiful, nothing is.
Paul Erdos
| N |
North |
| Both |
♠ K Q 8 7
♥ A 8 3
♦ A 10 5 2
♣ 5 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ A 5 4
♥ K Q J 10 4
♦ 8
♣ K J 9 3 |
♠ 2
♥ 9 7 6 2
♦ Q J 9 7 6
♣ 10 8 7 |
| South |
♠ J 10 9 6 3
♥ 5
♦ K 4 3
♣ A Q 6 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♦ |
Pass |
| 1 ♠ |
2 ♥ |
2 ♠ |
3 ♥ |
| 4 ♠ |
All pass |
|
|
♥K
It is far from clear where you should be going on this hand. But to start with, redouble to show your partner that you believe it is your side’s hand. You might make this call with rather less (take away the spade king for example) so you plan to follow up with an invitational sequence such as a jump to three hearts.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K Q 8 7
♥ A 8 3
♦ A 10 5 2
♣ 5 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♣ |
1 ♥ |
Dbl. |
| ? |
|
|
|
April 10th, 2017 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Monday, March 27th, 2017
I never resist temptation, because I have found things that are bad for me do not tempt me.
George Bernard Shaw
| S |
North |
| N-S |
♠ A 7 6
♥ Q J 7 2
♦ Q 7 6
♣ J 3 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q J 10 4
♥ 8 3
♦ 8 5 4 3 2
♣ 10 4 |
♠ K 8 5
♥ K 6 5 4
♦ 10 9
♣ K Q 8 5 |
| South |
♠ 9 3 2
♥ A 10 9
♦ A K J
♣ A 9 7 6 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
2 ♣ |
Pass |
| 2 ♦ |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♠Q
Dummy is surely going to put down a ruffing value either in spades or clubs – and you know your trumps won’t play a role on defense. I’d guess to lead trump to kill as many ruffs as I can, rather than do declarer’s work for him. Leading partner’s suit is all well and good, but you are also allowed to think for yourself.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ J 2
♥ Q J 9 5
♦ 9 6 3
♣ K Q 8 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
1 ♦ |
| Pass |
1 ♥ |
1 ♠ |
1 NT |
| Pass |
2 ♦ |
All pass |
|
April 9th, 2017 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Sunday, March 26th, 2017
|
What criteria should I apply after opening a strong no-trump to make a “super accept” of my partner’s transfer bid? Our current agreement is that with four trumps opener should jump to the three level, irrespective of his HCP, if not completely balanced. Is that a sound approach, particularly for Pairs? And would you recommend anything more detailed than this?
Having a Fit, West Palm Beach, Fla.
Maybe you can also use a two no-trump response as specifically a maximum with three good trumps, headed by two of the top three honors? Scientists will also assign meanings to new suits here, but I’m not sure that is a good investment of brain cells.
With: ♠ Q-2, ♥ K-9-6-5-3, ♦ A-8-5, ♣ K-10-4 I opened one heart and heard my partner respond two diamonds. Where do you rank the raise of diamonds, the rebid of hearts, or a two no-trump call?
Seconds Out, Tupelo, Miss.
The flawed options are to raise diamonds, which should deliver a fourth trump or extra high-cards, to rebid two no-trump without a proper spade stopper, or to rebid hearts. I prefer to play that as showing either a sixth trump or a respectable five-carder. Unless you can rebid your major with no guarantee as to suit quality, the least lie is surely to opt for the two no-trump rebid. This tells most of your story and may even right-side no-trump.
When the opponents overcall against our strong no-trump, what combination do you recommend of penalty doubles or take-out doubles by opener and responder?
Red-Card Robby, Milford, Pa.
After an overcall of two clubs (unless it specifically shows the majors) use double as Stayman, with transfers still in place. A double of any other artificial call —where the opponent’s bid does not show the suit bid — should be penalty oriented. The double of any natural call from either side of the table should be take-out, if it is the first action taken by the partnership after the no-trump opener. Subsequent doubles, or doubles after Stayman or a transfer, generally suggest defending.
|
I wonder if you could comment on the merits of the sandwich no-trump? Do you believe in fourth seat when sandwiched between bidding opponents, that you should play the call of one no-trump as natural or two-suited?
John Montague, Ketchikan, Alaska
By a passed hand, use the one no-trump call as 5-5 in the unbid suits, while double suggests 10-11, probably 5-4 pattern. An unpassed hand needs the call as natural and a decent strong no-trump. These days as openings and responses get lighter, your side may be able to make slam in the face of both opponents bidding — so you must be able to bid your good hands accurately. And when you can double or jump to an unusual two no-trump, you don’t need a third call for the unbid suits.
My partner and I were discussing the philosophy of competing, and this hand caused us fits. With ♠ A-Q-3-2, ♥ Q-5-3, ♦ K-10, ♣ J-9-4-2, in fourth chair after LHO opened one diamond and RHO bid one heart, would you double? Assuming you pass, what if LHO raises hearts, or even if he repeats diamonds, and the auction comes back to you?
Keeper of the Clink, Torrance, Calif.
I would not act on the first round, even though I have opening values. I need a little more shape or high cards than this. On the second round I would double whichever red suit my LHO had bid. There is no guarantee of safety, but I hate to be shut out.
|
April 8th, 2017 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Saturday, March 25th, 2017
Even a fool, when he keeps silent, is considered wise; when he closes his lips, he is considered prudent.
Book of Proverbs, Old Testament
| S |
North |
| N-S |
♠ 10
♥ A K 10 2
♦ K 10 8 7 4 3
♣ 6 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ K J 6 4 3
♥ J 9 7 4
♦ 9
♣ 8 7 5 |
♠ A 9 5
♥ Q 6 5
♦ Q J 5
♣ J 10 9 4 |
| South |
♠ Q 8 7 2
♥ 8 3
♦ A 6 2
♣ A K Q 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 NT |
2 ♣ * |
Dbl. |
2 ♦ |
| Pass |
2 ♥ |
3 ♥ |
Pass |
| 3 NT |
All pass |
|
|
*diamonds or the majors
♠4
You have the controls and playing strength for a one-level opener. The problem with passing is that you rate not to be able to get both suits in. While you have to rebid your diamonds over a likely one spade response, I would far rather do that than open two diamonds or pass. Were your side-suit spades not hearts, this would be a far more comfortable opening bid, since you have an easier rebid.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 10
♥ A K 10 2
♦ K 10 8 7 4 3
♣ 6 3 |
April 7th, 2017 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Friday, March 24th, 2017
Take chances, make mistakes. That’s how you grow. Pain nourishes your courage. You have to fail in order to practice being brave.
Mary Tyler Moore
| S |
North |
| E-W |
♠ A 6
♥ 8 4
♦ K J 7 3 2
♣ K 7 6 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ 8 4 3
♥ J 10 7 5 3
♦ A 4
♣ A 5 3 |
♠ J 10 9 7
♥ K 9 2
♦ 10 9 8 5
♣ 9 8 |
| South |
♠ K Q 5 2
♥ A Q 6
♦ Q 6
♣ Q J 10 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♥5
One possibility is to double, showing cards. Partner will tend only to remove with real extra shape, though. And if the opponents have 10 trumps between them they will surely come close to making their game. My preference would be to bid four no-trump to offer partner a choice of minors.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A 6
♥ 8 4
♦ K J 7 3 2
♣ K 7 6 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| Pass |
2 ♥ |
Dbl. |
4 ♥ |
| ? |
|
|
|
April 6th, 2017 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Thursday, March 23rd, 2017
When you have to kill a man, it costs nothing to be polite.
Winston Churchill
| E |
North |
| Both |
♠ 9 7 6 4 2
♥ K 4 3 2
♦ 7 3
♣ 9 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ 5 3
♥ 10 9 8 5
♦ J 8
♣ 10 8 6 5 3 |
♠ J 8
♥ A Q J 7
♦ K 10 9
♣ A Q J 7 |
| South |
♠ A K Q 10
♥ 6
♦ A Q 6 5 4 2
♣ K 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
1 ♣ |
| 1 ♦ |
Pass |
Pass |
1 ♥ |
| 2 ♠ |
3 ♣ |
4 ♠ |
All pass |
♥10
I can’t say I’m wild about it, but I would bid two hearts now, figuring that the opponents have a fit and so do we, and that we should do our best to push our opponents up to the three level. Of course if playing with an aggressive partner I can see why it might be right to pass and let partner take up the slack. But since we are facing a very good hand, we might well make game somewhere.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 9 7 6 4 2
♥ K 4 3 2
♦ 7 3
♣ 9 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♦ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
2 ♣ |
2 ♦ |
| ? |
|
|
|
April 5th, 2017 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Wednesday, March 22nd, 2017
An invasion of armies can be resisted, but not an idea whose time has come.
Victor Hugo
| S |
North |
| E-W |
♠ A 8 4
♥ J
♦ J 9 7 6 5 3
♣ A 9 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ K 9 6 3 2
♥ Q 5 3
♦ Q 10 2
♣ K 7 |
♠ Q J
♥ 10 9 8 7 4
♦ 8
♣ J 8 6 5 4 |
| South |
♠ 10 7 5
♥ A K 6 2
♦ A K 4
♣ Q 10 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
2 NT* |
Pass |
| 3 ♦ |
Pass |
3 ♥ ** |
Pass |
| 3 NT |
All pass |
|
|
*diamonds
**shortness
♠3
Your partner does not promise more than a five-card suit for this auction. Rather than leave him to stew in an unsatisfactory trump fit, I would bid one no-trump. With both opponents acting, this is not a try for game showing extras, it is merely an attempt to improve the contract.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A 8 4
♥ J
♦ J 9 7 6 5 3
♣ A 8 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
1 ♣ |
| 1 ♦ |
Dbl. |
1 ♥ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
April 4th, 2017 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Tuesday, March 21st, 2017
If I see an ending, I can work backward.
Arthur Miller
| E |
North |
| Both |
♠ 6 4 2
♥ A 6
♦ 8 4 2
♣ K Q 8 6 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ J
♥ K Q 10 5
♦ A Q 6 3
♣ 10 9 7 3 |
♠ Q 8 7
♥ J 8 7 4 2
♦ 10 9 7
♣ J 2 |
| South |
♠ A K 10 9 5 3
♥ 9 3
♦ K J 5
♣ A 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
Pass |
| 1 ♠ |
Dbl. |
2 ♣ * |
Pass |
| 4 ♠ |
All pass |
|
|
*7-9 with three spades
♥K
Even though your side appears to be outnumbered in terms of high cards, I would not be able to resist competing to two spades. My good spade spots mean I have relative safety at the two level, and the urge to push the opponents up a little has always been nearly irresistible to me. Plus, I would not be upset to see my partner bid three spades over three of a minor.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A K 10 9 5 3
♥ 9 3
♦ K J 5
♣ A 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
1 ♦ |
| 1 ♠ |
2 ♣ |
Pass |
2 ♦ |
| ? |
|
|
|
April 3rd, 2017 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Monday, March 20th, 2017
I do not mind lying, but I hate inaccuracy.
Samuel Butler
| N |
North |
| N-S |
♠ 10 7 6
♥ J 4
♦ K 10 9 4
♣ A K Q 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ K Q 4
♥ K Q 10 9 8
♦ —
♣ J 9 8 7 3 |
♠ A 9 8 5
♥ 7 5 2
♦ J 8 6 5
♣ 10 5 |
| South |
♠ J 3 2
♥ A 6 3
♦ A Q 7 3 2
♣ 6 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♣ |
Pass |
| 1 ♦ |
1 ♥ |
2 ♦ |
Pass |
| 2 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♥K
Dummy will have a strong no-trump or so, preferring hearts to spades, declarer both majors, probably with longer spades than hearts. This may be my last chance to lead through a tenace in dummy so I’m going to lead the club queen. Without the club nine it is a much harder decision.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ J 9 3
♥ 10 5 2
♦ 7 4 2
♣ Q J 9 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♦ |
Pass |
| Pass |
Dbl. |
Pass |
1 ♠ |
| Pass |
1 NT |
Pass |
2 ♥ |
| All pass |
|
|
|
April 2nd, 2017 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Sunday, March 19th, 2017
|
Can you comment on whether it is right to upgrade one or two-suited hands into a two club opener? Specifically, I had ♠ Q-4, ♥ A-K-J-4, ♦ A-J, ♣ K-Q-J-5-4 and when I opened one club I played there for +110 with four hearts making facing a hand with the two red queens. At least I did better than the players who went down in two no-trump!
Starting small, Bellingham, Wash.
The only time it is right to open two clubs with a two-suiter is when you are so strong (typically with a long major) that you just can’t take the risk that your one-level opening bid will be passed out — if you have 23 HCP for example. You are close here, but I’d argue that the auction will time out much more economically if you bid clubs then reverse or jump shift into hearts. And yes, opening two no-trump would certainly not be absurd.
How should you deal with intervention over your Blackwood enquiry? Does it matter what level the opponents come in at?
Aces and Spaces, Greenville, S.C.
The simplest method in common usage is that if the intervention is five of your trump suit or higher, you double with an even number of aces (or keycards) pass with an odd number. If the intervention is lower than that, double with zero, pass shows one, the next bid showing two (without the trump queen if playing keycard responses). These methods are abbreviated to DEPO and DOPI.
As a relative novice to teams event, can you explain why there are all these complicated scoring tables in use, such as IMPs and victory points? Could you explain precisely how they work and why they are used?
Lost in Translation, Akron, Ohio
IMPs (international match points) convert total points into a sliding scale in which, essentially, the small swings in total points are worth more, relatively speaking. Three swings of 90 points are each worth 3 IMPs, one swing of 270 is worth 7 IMPs. Victory points in short matches are another conversion scale, used typically in Swiss Teams events.
|
Not vulnerable, are there ever any circumstances where you would open the bidding at the two level, not the three level with a seven-card suit? Recently at pairs with no one vulnerable I held: ♠ —, ♥ Q-9-7-6-5-3-2, ♦ 8-5, ♣ A-10-8-3. Could you discuss what options are sensible here?
Quality Surveyor, Wichita Falls, Texas
This may come down to a question of partnership style and aggression rather than what is right or wrong. I’m not a fan of opening at the two-level with a seven-carder, because your partner tends to misevaluate his side’s fit and your losing trick count. That said, you could argue this suit is really only a six-carder. Still, I would open three hearts if nonvulnerable. Vulnerable I’d hate to pass this hand; I could be tempted to open two hearts not three, especially in second seat.
What do you recommend for doubles by responder and opener, in a sequence where the opponents intervene after your side has used Stayman? Should it matter whether it is opener or responder who doubles the intervention?
Seize the Day, Bristol, Va.
I can see arguments for complexity, but the overwhelming case for simplicity outweighs them. How about this simple agreement: any double by opener is penalty, whereas double by responder at the two-level is penalty, but at the three-level is take-out. Incidentally, Smolen is still on by responder. Another good blanket rule is that double by both hands is only take out as defined above, or if the partnership has done nothing but pass before doubling for the first time.
|
|
In today’s deal, with a singleton, five trump, and apparently fitting cards, South should jump directly to four spades at his second turn after discovering his partner has opening values and spade support. A bid of three spades would be purely competitive and not a game try, while a double of three hearts would be a more balanced game try.
When dummy comes down, South can count just four tricks in side suits. He therefore needs to take six trump tricks. One way is to win four trumps in his own hand and ruff two cards in the dummy. Another way is to win three trumps in the dummy and to ruff three cards in his own hand. Either way will work perfectly well, so long as South avoids drawing trump prematurely. As is usual, when you want to ruff things, don’t draw trump.
The easiest route to the cross-ruff is to trump two of clubs in dummy. The first step is to win the opening lead and try the club finesse. West wins the club king and shifts to ace and another spade, since he can the see the looming threat.
South now leads a club to his ace, ruffs a club to dummy, then ruffs a heart, and ruffs another club. At this point South can afford to draw West’s last trump. He comes to his hand by ruffing another heart and leads out his last high trump. He has taken eight tricks, and can collect his side’s diamond winners to make his contract.