May 23rd, 2017 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Tuesday, May 9th, 2017
Wit will shine Through the harsh cadence of a rugged line.
John Dryden
| S |
North |
| None |
♠ Q 8 6 5
♥ K Q 8 7 5
♦ K 8 3
♣ 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ 2
♥ 6 4
♦ A Q J 6 4
♣ K J 9 8 4 |
♠ K J 10 9 3
♥ 3 2
♦ 10 9
♣ 10 7 5 3 |
| South |
♠ A 7 4
♥ A J 10 9
♦ 7 5 2
♣ A Q 6 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♥ |
2 NT |
4 ♣ * |
Pass |
| 4 ♥ |
All pass |
|
|
*splinter-raise of hearts
♠2
You may not have much in the way of high cards but you have a lot of playing strength and must compete to two spades. The secrets of responding to take-out doubles is for your hand – the advancer — to take up the slack, while the doubler assumes his partner knows what he has (opening values with suitable shape) and tends only to bid again with extra shape or high cards.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K J 10 9 3
♥ 3 2
♦ J 9
♣ 10 7 5 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| Pass |
1 ♦ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| 1 ♠ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
2 ♥ |
| ? |
|
|
|
May 22nd, 2017 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Monday, May 8th, 2017
First ponder, then dare.
Helmuth von Moltke
| N |
North |
| N-S |
♠ K 10 2
♥ 8 7 4
♦ A 9 8 6
♣ A K 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ 9 8 5 4 3
♥ A 10 9 3
♦ J 5
♣ Q 7 |
♠ 7 6
♥ Q J 5
♦ Q 7 4 3 2
♣ J 9 6 |
| South |
♠ A Q J
♥ K 6 2
♦ K 10
♣ 10 8 5 4 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♦ |
Pass |
| 3 NT |
All pass |
|
|
♠9
I don’t see any good reason not to lead diamonds, but I can see a good reason to break the rules and lead the queen. After all, if declarer has the jack it probably doesn’t matter which card I lead, and similarly if partner has the king-jack, but if partner has the ace-jack and dummy the king, leading a high diamond might work very well to run the suit on defense.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 10 2
♥ J 6 4
♦ Q 10 3
♣ 10 9 3 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
2 ♥ |
| Pass |
2 NT |
Pass |
3 ♣ |
| Pass |
3 ♥ |
Pass |
4 ♥ |
| All pass |
|
|
|
May 21st, 2017 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Sunday, May 7th, 2017
|
My partner opened one diamond (guaranteeing four but we open relatively light) and I responded one heart holding ♠ A-7-4-2, ♥ 5-4-3-2 ♦ A, ♣ A-5-3-2. When my partner raised to two hearts, would you judge this hand worth a drive to game, an invite to three hearts…or something else? Trumps didn’t split and eight tricks were the limit.
Sky Pilot, Cartersville, Ga.
Assuming partner has a normal minimum opener, typically with four trumps, why not make a game try of two spades and see what he does. In theory, two opening bids facing one another make game! Incidentally, I could imagine going one down in three hearts here would score very well — beating all the pairs two down in game.
I recently had an ethical problem when I led a king from king-queen small against a suit contract and dummy hit with jack-third, on which my partner took forever to contribute the two. Can you tell me my rights and obligations in this situation when my king held?
Moriarty, Walnut Creek, Calif.
Don’t try to work out what partner ‘might’ have been thinking about: you would normally make the play you would have done on receiving discouragement. Equally, though, you do not have to stop playing bridge. If logic and your own hand combine to tell you that it is obviously right to continue the suit, you can do so. Here declarer is unlikely to have the critical ace, or he would have won the trick. So partner has the ace and is signaling either count or suit preference depending upon the logical context.
Holding ♠ K-2, ♥ 9-8-5-3-2, ♦ 10-5-4-2, ♣ A-5, I imagine that if partner opened one spade and the next hand bid two clubs that you would stretch to make a negative double. But what if your RHO bid two diamonds? Would you double, and if so what would you do over a response of three clubs?
Flag Flier, Janesville, Wis.
Though you are light on high-cards, a negative double of two clubs is acceptable because you are playable in all the available suits. But doubling two diamonds would seem too rich for the reason you identify — and also that you could not handle a response of two no-trump. So I’d pass two diamonds, hoping partner would re-open, if short in diamonds.
|
How much do you need to double a strong no-trump? Is it worthwhile considering playing a defense other than a penalty double against the strong no-trump if your opponents use it tactically at certain positions and vulnerabilities?
Samba Sam, Dallas, Texas
I had always played penalty doubles in all seats, but I could be persuaded that a defense such as Meckwell or Woolsey makes sense. (Details of these are available at http://andrew-gumperz.blogspot.ca/2011/11/what-are-some-common-defenses-to-strong.html) Whatever you play, you must keep double of third-in-hand no-trumps as strong, or devious opponents will push you around.
Your column often refers obliquely to a support double. Can you spell out how and when they apply, and if you recommend them?
Raising in the Sun, Lorain, Ohio
Judging competitive auctions sometimes hinges on each side’s total number of trumps held. If as opener you raise in competition with either three or four, you may make your partner’s task harder at his next turn. So opener can use the double of cheap intervention – below two of partner’s suit – as three-card support. Thus the raise promises four trump. I find the double gives away as much as it gains; there again, the axiom about old dogs and new tricks may be in point.
|
May 20th, 2017 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Saturday, May 6th, 2017
We were revisionists; what we revised was ourselves.
Margaret Atwood
| S |
North |
| Both |
♠ J 8 4
♥ 3
♦ A 10 9 6 4 3
♣ 9 5 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q 9 5 2
♥ K J 10 5 4 2
♦ 2
♣ K Q |
♠ 3
♥ A Q 8
♦ 8 7 5
♣ J 10 8 7 3 2 |
| South |
♠ A K 10 7 6
♥ 9 7 6
♦ K Q J
♣ A 6 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♠ |
2 ♥ |
2 ♠ |
3 ♥ |
| 4 ♠ |
All pass |
|
|
♦2
You have a great hand – but you showed every bit of it at your second turn. Your partner’s raise is mere courtesy; he could have bid game, jumped, or made a cuebid, so you shouldn’t expect more than one cover card. With the spade queen and the heart ace, for example, he would have done more. So pass two spades.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A K 10 7 6
♥ 9 7 6
♦ K Q J
♣ A 6 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
Pass |
1 ♣ |
| Dbl. |
Pass |
1 ♥ |
Pass |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
2 ♠ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
May 19th, 2017 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Friday, May 5th, 2017
I don’t think necessity is the mother of invention — invention, in my opinion, arises directly from idleness, possibly also from laziness. To save oneself trouble.
Agatha Christie
| S |
North |
| None |
♠ 7 6
♥ A J 6 5 4 2
♦ Q 7 3
♣ K J |
| West |
East |
♠ Q J 9
♥ K 10 8 7
♦ J 9 4 2
♣ 9 4 |
♠ 10 8 5 4 3
♥ —
♦ 10 6
♣ Q 10 8 6 5 3 |
| South |
♠ A K 2
♥ Q 9 3
♦ A K 8 5
♣ A 7 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 2 NT |
Pass |
3 ♦ * |
Pass |
| 3 ♥ |
Pass |
6 ♥ |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
*transfer to hearts
♠Q
Your partner’s call shows a maximum pass and heart fit. So how much is your hand worth? I wouldn’t drive to game, but I think I have enough to make a try. While a bid of three hearts is purely competitive, I am just about worth a call of three diamonds, a long-suit help try. That should let my partner decide whether to go to game or stop in three hearts (assuming the opponents let us).
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 7 6
♥ A J 6 5 4 2
♦ Q 7 3
♣ K J |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
Pass |
1 ♣ |
| 1 ♥ |
1 ♠ |
2 ♣ |
2 ♠ |
| ? |
|
|
|
May 18th, 2017 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Thursday, May 4th, 2017
Young men have a passion for regarding their elders as senile.
Henry Brooks Adams
| S |
North |
| N-S |
♠ A Q 10 3
♥ Q 10 9 8
♦ A Q 9
♣ K 5 |
| West |
East |
♠ 5 4 2
♥ 7
♦ K J 10 4
♣ 8 7 6 4 3 |
♠ K J 8 6
♥ 6 4 3
♦ 5 2
♣ Q J 10 2 |
| South |
♠ 9 7
♥ A K J 5 2
♦ 8 7 6 3
♣ A 9 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♥ |
Pass |
2 NT* |
Pass |
| 4 ♥ |
Pass |
4 NT |
Pass |
| 5 ♣ ** |
Pass |
6 ♥ |
All Pass |
*game-forcing with hearts
**three key cards
♦J
Had East not suggested values, you might have raised to two hearts, but should not do so here. Your hand is all about defense; if your RHO promises decent values with a call at the two-level, then when you raise hearts you should have a decent hand, decent hearts or decent offense. You have none of these, and don’t want to direct a heart lead, so pass. You might reopen over two diamonds, of course.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K J 8 6
♥ 6 4 3
♦ 5 2
♣ Q J 10 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♦ |
1 ♥ |
2 ♣ |
| ? |
|
|
|
May 17th, 2017 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Wednesday, May 3rd, 2017
To expect the unexpected shows a thoroughly modern intellect.
Oscar Wilde
| E |
North |
| None |
♠ K 7 6
♥ K Q 8 7 2
♦ A Q 9
♣ A 7 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q 10 9 4 3
♥ 6 5 4
♦ 10 8 6 5
♣ 2 |
♠ 8 5
♥ 10
♦ 7 3 2
♣ K Q J 8 6 5 4 |
| South |
♠ A J 2
♥ A J 9 3
♦ K J 4
♣ 10 9 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
3 ♣ |
| Dbl. |
Pass |
4 ♣ |
Pass |
| 4 ♥ |
Pass |
5 ♣ |
Pass |
| 5 ♥ |
Pass |
6 ♥ |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♣2
Is this hand worth an invitation to slam? I could be persuaded that it was worth a quantitative four no-trump call, but only because of the decent intermediates. The heart 10 would be enough to reassure me completely, but take away the club 10-9 and I would go low and settle for three no-trump. Even as it is, three no-trump might be enough facing any but the strongest of declarers.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A J 2
♥ A J 9 3
♦ J 9 4
♣ 10 9 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
2 NT |
Pass |
| 3 ♣ |
Pass |
3 ♦ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
May 16th, 2017 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Tuesday, May 2nd, 2017
Scenery is fine – but human nature is finer.
John Keats
| N |
North |
| E-W |
♠ K Q 8 6 4
♥ A J 6
♦ A Q
♣ K 6 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ 10 9 7 2
♥ K 10 2
♦ J 10 9 8
♣ Q 8 |
♠ 5 3
♥ 9 8 5 3
♦ K 7 4
♣ A 10 9 7 |
| South |
♠ A J
♥ Q 7 4
♦ 6 5 3 2
♣ J 5 4 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♠ |
Pass |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
2 NT |
Pass |
| 3 NT |
All pass |
|
|
♦J
Double by you would be responsive, and your partner would expect both majors. It is simplest to bid two hearts now. While your partner might have three hearts and five clubs, playing the known fit at the two-level is the most practical action; you should play the percentages and not worry about looking for perfection.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A J
♥ J 5 4 2
♦ Q 7 4
♣ 6 5 3 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| Pass |
1 ♦ |
Dbl. |
2 ♦ |
| ? |
|
|
|
May 15th, 2017 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Monday, May 1st, 2017
A fool must now and then be right by chance.
William Cowper
| S |
North |
| E-W |
♠ 8 5
♥ K Q 9 2
♦ K 6 4 3
♣ 8 6 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ 6 3
♥ A 7 4 3
♦ Q J 10 5
♣ A 7 2 |
♠ 10 7 2
♥ J 10 6
♦ 9 7 2
♣ K J 10 3 |
| South |
♠ A K Q J 9 4
♥ 8 5
♦ A 8
♣ Q 9 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
1 NT |
Pass |
| 3 ♠ |
Pass |
4 ♠ |
All pass |
♦Q
It certainly feels wrong to lead diamonds here. The question is if this double calls for a heart lead, or whether you must guess if partner has a solid suit —which would rate to be spades I guess. My best guess is to lead hearts; I’m prepared to look stupid. But the opponents might have run if they were off the spade suit – and partner might have acted at his first turn with good spades.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ J 4
♥ 8 3
♦ A Q 9 6 4 3
♣ 9 5 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 2 ♦ |
2 ♥ |
Pass |
2 NT |
| Pass |
3 NT |
Dbl. |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
May 14th, 2017 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Sunday, April 30th, 2017
|
If a partnership tends to open light, with initial actions starting at 10 HCP, does this need to be alerted? I had thought 10 HCP was the lower limit, unless a prealert is made. Then it might become an issue if some clubs won’t allow it in first or second seat.
What About Bob, Panama City, Fla.
I agree that systemically light openers starting at fewer than 11 points should be pre-alerted. Those people playing strong club often do it and don’t alert it; but in my opinion it is, at the very minimum, a courtesy you owe your opponents.
Can you comment on the merits or demerits of a Walsh style of responding to a club opener in a major rather than in diamonds unless you have invitational or better values? This may mean bidding a four-card major in front of a four- or even five-card diamond suit?
Road Warrior, Newark, N.J.
The pluses of the bypass are that opener gets to rebid one no-trump over one diamond when balanced, while bidding a major promises real clubs. It isn’t all one-way traffic of course, but I like the general idea. I believe that having opener rebid no-trump when balanced is a big plus. This doesn’t mean there won’t be counter-examples where diamonds get lost. But these days, minor suits seem to be going out of style.
After a one club opener to your right, with: ♠ J-2, ♥ A-J-9-8-6, ♦ K-10-6, ♣ A-Q-3 where do you stand on the issue of overcalling in the major or bidding one no-trump? And what are the factors that influence you in a decision of this sort?
Germanicus, Huntington, W. Va.
With a good five-carder and a small doubleton I think the odds are weighted to overcall in the major instead of bidding a strong no-trump. You may occasionally have to re-open with a take-out double if you overcall, when the opponents find spades, since you are at the top end of the range for an overcall. But I do not think we will often miss game if I make the simple overcall. We might miss hearts if I bid one no-trump, however.
|
If you play in three spades doubled and make two overtricks not vulnerable, I understand you double the trick score to get 180, then add 50 for insult and 300 for game. But is making the extra tricks worth 30 or 60 above the line?
Pack-Rat, Union City, Tenn.
The score for three spades doubled is indeed 180 for tricks, with 50 for insult, and 300 for game. But you score 100 for each doubled overtrick, which comes to 730. The general rule is that doubled overtricks are 100 non-vulnerable, 200 if vulnerable. Meanwhile redoubled overtricks are 200 or 400 each. Incidentally, the back of the cards in the bidding boxes lists all the possible outcomes for each contract, doubled or redoubled.
With: ♠ A-8-7-2, ♥ J-8, ♦ A-Q-9-6-4, ♣ Q-3, when you hear your partner open one club you respond one diamond and hear partner raise to two diamonds. Would you blast three no-trump now or take a slower route?
Psycho Killer, Hoboken, N.J.
I’m not averse to concealing my hand type under the right conditions. Here, though I am in doubt as to strain and level so I go with two spades. Notrump could easily be much better from my partner’s hand, by the way.
|
|
Most of us are familiar with the idea that unnecessary jumps in an uncontested auction can be used for splinter bids. The definition of a splinter – devised by Dave Cliff and Dorothy Hayden Truscott in the 1960’s – is a forcing raise for partner’s suit, showing a singleton or void in the named suit.
The logic of the application of a splinter extends to the contested auction. On the sequence presented in today’s auction, where South was playing four-card majors, West promised both minors, and the jump to four clubs was a splinter raise, showing game-going values, with short clubs. It also set up a forcing pass if the opponents had bid on.
After West’s revealing lead of the spade two against four hearts, South saw that he surely had two losers in that suit. To set up an endplay, South won his ace, took the club ace and ruffed a club, crossed to hand with a top trump to ruff a club, then drew the last trump and led a diamond toward the king.
Whether West flew up with the ace or ducked, declarer could no longer be defeated. Say West ducks; declarer wins the king and plays a second diamond. East can win, but if he does he will be endplayed to broach spades, and that will still be 10 tricks for declarer. If West instead wins the second diamond and cashes the third, then he will have to give a ruff-sluff, and one of the spade losers goes away.