January 29th, 2017 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 1 Comment
|
Recently, I have observed many top pairs using a no-trump range of 14-16. Is this done to increase the frequency of opening with that call, or to allow other opening bids to be adjusted down by one point? And do you have an opinion on this lower range?
Weight Lifter, Phoenix, Ariz.
Using the lower range lets you open all balanced 11 counts if you wish. The logic behind having a three-point range for the no-trump opening (be it 12-14, 15-17, or 16-18) is that responder can clarify if opener has a minimum or maximum by inviting. It makes sense for your opening and no-trump rebids each to be three points wide. Of course opening these 11-counts requires you to be more disciplined in inviting or driving to game. Easier said than done.
When looking for an old Aces column I found this source of back hands online: http://aces.bridgeblogging.com/. It appears it is two weeks behind, right? In other words, one cannot retrieve a current deal for a fortnight?
Little Engine, Atlanta, Ga.
Yes; the idea is that the column can only be read timeously in the paper not online. This is a very generous service offered by the syndicator – and I hope it is a way to read the column outside the United States.
I was at favorable vulnerability playing teams when my LHO opened two hearts. I held: ♠ J-4, ♥ K-Q-7-4, ♦ A-9, ♣ A-Q-74-2. What would you consider the relative merits of balancing with three clubs or two no-trump, or of doubling?
Aces and Spaces, Massapequa, N.Y.
Bidding two no-trump to show a strong no-trump is the mainstream action, and I might do it even if there are many ways that the call could rebound on you. the problem with a call of three clubs is that partner isn’t likely to head for three no-trump. Since doubling is impossible, I think passing at this specific vulnerability might be our best chance to go plus. If we make three no-trump, won’t we collect 300 or so?
|
I had an opening lead problem against one no-trump, passed out. We were vulnerable, our opponents not, and I held ♠ K-Q- 3-2, ♥ Q-10-8-3, ♦ -9 4 ♣ 9 6 5. As a couple of subsidiary questions, would you lead differently if LHO had raised to three no-trump? And does the presence or absence of the heart eight affect your lead.
Robber Baron, East Brunswick, N.J.
The heart eight does not affect my choice, but the presence of the heart 10 makes me think a heart lead is better than a spade against either partscore or game. I’m not sure I can explain why except that with the spade ace likely on my right I’m jeopardizing a ‘sure’ trick by leading that suit. Without the heart 10, it is a toss-up.
You recently wrote about second degree assumptions as declarer. This is not a concept I am familiar, with so any help would be appreciated.
Milkman Mike, Mitchell, S.D.
Terence Reese was the first person I know of to discuss the idea of placing the cards that were missing (either onside if you were in optimistic contract or offside if you were in a good one) so as to decide how to play a two-way finesse. This is discussed in Master Play but there are many other books he wrote that should help you in this area.
|
January 28th, 2017 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 10 Comments
History teaches us that men and nations behave wisely once they have exhausted all other alternatives.
Abba Eban
| S |
North |
| E-W |
♠ J 7 5 4
♥ A 9 6 5 2
♦ 8 6 3
♣ 9 |
| West |
East |
♠ 10 9 8
♥ J 4
♦ K 7
♣ A J 8 5 3 2 |
♠ 3
♥ K Q 10 8
♦ 10 9 5 4 2
♣ K 10 7 |
| South |
♠ A K Q 6 2
♥ 7 3
♦ A Q J
♣ Q 6 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♠ |
2 ♣ |
2 ♠ |
3 ♣ |
| 4 ♠ |
All pass |
|
|
♠10
This is the perfect hand for Crawling Stayman – also inelegantly referred to as Garbage Stayman. Your plan when you bid two clubs is to pass a response in a major, or to correct two diamonds to two hearts. That shows both majors and a weak hand, with something less than invitational values.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ J 7 5 4
♥ A 9 6 5 2
♦ 8 6 3
♣ 9 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
1 NT |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
January 27th, 2017 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 13 Comments
The player on the other side is hidden from us. We know that his play is always fair, just, and patient.
Thomas Huxley
| S |
North |
| E-W |
♠ Q J 5
♥ 8 6 5 2
♦ A 5 3
♣ K Q J |
| West |
East |
♠ 7 6 2
♥ K Q J
♦ Q 10 8 6 4
♣ 9 5 |
♠ 8 3
♥ A 10 9 7 3
♦ 9 7
♣ 10 7 4 2 |
| South |
♠ A K 10 9 4
♥ 4
♦ K J 2
♣ A 8 6 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
2 ♣ |
Pass |
| 3 ♥ * |
Pass |
3 ♠ |
Pass |
| 4 ♣ |
Pass |
4 NT |
Pass |
| 5 ♣ ** |
Pass |
6 ♠ |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
*shortage **three key cards
♥K
Everyone ought to define what is the weakest action in an auction when a cuebid that forces the partnership to a specific level (here two spades) is doubled. Does a pass or reversion to two spades show a weaker hand? I suggest always using reversion to the trump suit as weakest. That being so, I would redouble two diamonds to suggest the ace, and let partner make the running from here.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ Q J 5
♥ 8 6 5 2
♦ A 5 3
♣ K Q J |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♦ |
1 ♠ |
Dbl. |
| 2 ♦ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
January 26th, 2017 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 10 Comments
This shows how much easier it is to be critical than to be correct.
Benjamin Disraeli
| S |
North |
| E-W |
♠ Q J 4
♥ K 7
♦ Q 10 8 5 2
♣ 8 6 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ 8 2
♥ J 8 6 5 4 3 2
♦ K 4
♣ 7 3 |
♠ K 10 9 7 5
♥ 9
♦ A 7
♣ K 10 9 5 2 |
| South |
♠ A 6 3
♥ A Q 10
♦ J 9 6 3
♣ A Q J |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♦ |
Pass |
2 ♦ |
2 ♠ |
| 2 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♠8
Even though your queens are in the suits where partner rates to be short, and so may not be pulling their full weight, you are not ashamed of your hand. So it feels right to give false preference to two hearts, and keep the auction open in case partner is about to show extras. Were the heart king the jack, I might consider passing two clubs.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ Q J 4
♥ K 7
♦ Q 10 8 5 2
♣ 8 6 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
1 ♥ |
Pass |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
2 ♣ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
January 25th, 2017 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Wednesday, October 11th, 2017
What a word is truth. Slippery, tricky, unreliable. I tried in these books to tell the truth.
Lilian Hellman
| S |
North |
| N-S |
♠ A K 9
♥ K 10 2
♦ 7 6 2
♣ A Q 4 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ 8 6 5 3
♥ 6 5
♦ Q 9 8 3
♣ J 10 9 |
♠ Q J 10 4 2
♥ 8 7 4
♦ 10
♣ K 8 6 5 |
| South |
♠ 7
♥ A Q J 9 3
♦ A K J 5 4
♣ 7 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♥ |
Pass |
2 ♣ |
Pass |
| 2 ♦ |
Pass |
3 ♥ |
Pass |
| 4 ♦ |
Pass |
4 NT |
Pass |
| 5 ♠ |
Pass |
5 NT |
Pass |
| 6 ♦ |
Pass |
6 ♥ |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♣J
You may be tempted to pass, and I might indeed break partnership discipline to do that if slightly weaker. However, this auction is technically forcing. On this sequence, it is modern practice to play the call of two spades as natural but not promising or denying extra values, forcing for one round. So your plan would be to bid two spades, and pass any non-forcing continuation partner produces.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ Q J 10 4 2
♥ 8 7 4
♦ 10
♣ K 8 6 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
1 ♦ |
Pass |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
2 ♥ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
January 25th, 2017 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 10 Comments
Free speech is meant to protect unpopular speech. Popular speech, by definition, needs no protection.
Neal Boortz
| S |
North |
| N-S |
♠ 10 9 7
♥ K 10 5
♦ K Q 10 5 4
♣ K 8 |
| West |
East |
♠ K Q J 6 2
♥ 8 6 2
♦ 9 7
♣ J 10 4 |
♠ 8 4
♥ 7 4
♦ A J 3
♣ Q 9 7 6 3 2 |
| South |
♠ A 5 3
♥ A Q J 9 3
♦ 8 6 2
♣ A 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♥ |
1 ♠ |
2 ♦ |
Pass |
| 2 ♥ |
Pass |
3 ♥ |
Pass |
| 3 ♠ |
Pass |
4 ♥ |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♠K
Your partner’s double is value showing, maybe in terms of high cards, a minimum of an eight-count? He typically has a doubleton heart and suggests length in the other suits. I would pass and lead a trump; where are the opponents going to score tricks except from the trump suit?
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A 10 5
♥ A Q J 9 3
♦ 8 6 2
♣ A 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
2 ♦ |
| 2 ♥ |
3 ♦ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
January 24th, 2017 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
No idea is so modern that it will not someday be antiquated.
Ellen Glasgow
| S |
North |
| E-W |
♠ J 6 3 2
♥ 8
♦ A Q 10 7 5
♣ 6 5 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ 9
♥ A K J 10 7
♦ 8 6 3
♣ K J 8 4 |
♠ 7 4
♥ 6 5 4 3
♦ J 9 4 2
♣ A 9 7 |
| South |
♠ A K Q 10 8 5
♥ Q 9 2
♦ K
♣ Q 10 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♠ |
2 ♥ |
3 ♥ |
Pass |
| 4 ♠ |
All pass |
|
|
♥K
Although the jump to three spades does not definitively lock spades into being trumps, it suggests at most a one-loser suit. The four heart call is still technically consistent with a hand with 5-6 in the reds, but sounds more like a cuebid for spades with no club control. So you should bid four spades now.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A K Q 10 8 5
♥ Q 9 2
♦ K
♣ Q 10 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
2 ♦ |
Pass |
| 3 ♠ |
Pass |
4 ♥ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
January 23rd, 2017 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 5 Comments
It is a place with only one post a day…In the country I always fear that creation will expire before tea-time.
Sydney Smith
| S |
North |
| Both |
♠ K J 2
♥ K 5
♦ A 10 7 5 4
♣ 8 3 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ 9 6 3
♥ J 10 9 7
♦ K J
♣ Q 6 5 4 |
♠ 8
♥ A Q 8 4 2
♦ Q 9 6 2
♣ J 10 9 |
| South |
♠ A Q 10 7 5 4
♥ 6 3
♦ 8 3
♣ A K 7 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
1 NT* |
Pass |
| 2 ♠ |
Pass |
4 ♠ |
All pass |
*forcing
♥J
Since the opponents appear to have about 24 HCP between them, to have invited game and stopped in two no-trump, you can tell that marks partner with a relatively light overcall. The lighter his hand, the more likely that he has a decent spade suit. So I would lead my singleton, rather than getting aggressive and leading a club. The spade won’t do anything for declarer that he can’t do for himself.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ 7
♥ Q 9 7 3 2
♦ K 5
♣ Q 9 7 4 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
1 ♦ |
| Pass |
1 ♥ |
1 ♠ |
1 NT |
| Pass |
2 NT |
All pass |
|
January 22nd, 2017 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 8 Comments
|
Playing duplicate pairs, when I heard an opening bid of one spade on my right I elected to pass with a 3-4-2-4 12-count. I thought double would be too risky, though this decision was later criticized. When my LHO bid one no-trump and my RHO bid two diamonds, could I have doubled now? As it turned out, we can make two hearts and they can make two diamonds.
Judgment of Paris, Park City, Utah
Your initial pass is perfectly fine; if you double (I might) it runs the risk of partner going overboard in diamonds, or of your walking into a large penalty. At your second turn a take-out double was risky but not entirely unreasonable. Your shape was acceptable so if you had ace-queen fourth in both unbid suits you might gamble it – but it is risky.
As a recent bidding problem you posed the following hand for responder, ♠ A-K-4-3, ♥ K-Q-2, ♦ 8-2, ♣ Q-7-64, on the unopposed sequence: one diamond – one spade – two clubs. You recommend the fourth suit as a game force and then to raise clubs at the three level. But you can only do that if your partner bids two spades or two no-trump. What do you do if partner bids a minor next?
Till Eulenspiegel, Sacramento, Calif.
I think I would rebid three no-trump over three diamonds, but over three clubs I would raise to four. I appreciate that I may miss playing no-trump, and be forcing my partner to the five level, so at pairs the decision would be VERY tough.
At a recent session of rubber bridge there were a few throw-ins, where everybody passed. During the postmortem it was observed that we rarely see or hear about this happening to experts. My question is, how rare is this at duplicate? And are you allowed to re-deal a hand that is thrown in on the first round of a duplicate event?
The Great Shuffler, Richmond, Va.
I wouldn’t say rare, but my experience is that third in hand so often stretches to open on a deal where he has 10/11 points, that the number of pass-outs has dropped dramatically from 40 years ago. And so many 11-counts are opened systemically that I don’t see a pass-out more than once a month. Re-deals are never permitted, by the way.
|
My partner and I play two-over-one. Recently, she had a good hand (16 or so points) with five spades and five hearts. I had 11 points with two small spades and three hearts, and responded with a forcing no-trump to one spade. When she bid two hearts, I took her for only four hearts and bid two no-trump. When she subsequently re-bid spades, I raised to game in spades. That went down one, while four hearts would have made easily. She told me her heart bid in that sequence meant she had five hearts. Is that right?
Shape Shifter, North Bay, Ontario
After your response of one no-trump your partner’s two heart call is quite consistent with only four. If she rebids her hearts that shows 5-5 in the majors, which would accurately have described her shape, if not her assets, since it suggests a minimum hand and is non-forcing over a two no-trump rebid. To show a good hand with this pattern it might be better to bid a doubleton minor to dredge up three-card support for hearts or spades from you.
I had a hand with two aces and my partner was upset that I opened two hearts. Vulnerable, I had: ♠ 9-4-2, ♥ Q-9-6-5-4-3, ♦ A-4, ♣ A-J. I did not count the club jack as pulling its weight, so given the vulnerability, I decided to go low. I made my contract, which got me a top, as most pairs ended up in game down one or two.
Heads Up, Cheyenne, Wyo.
You don’t want to open a weak two with tricks on the side and a feeble suit. When deciding whether to open, my rule is to add up my points, then add one for any five-card suit, two for a six-card suit, and one for any side four-card suit. If it comes to 13, I open at the one level, unless I have less than an ace and king on defense. This hand qualifies a sound one-level opener. And as an aside: never pass a hand with a good suit; open one, two or three.
|
January 21st, 2017 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 5 Comments
I know enough of the world now to have almost lost the capacity of being much surprised by anything.
Charles Dickens
| S |
North |
| E-W |
♠ Q
♥ K J 10 6
♦ J 6 4 2
♣ K 7 5 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ J 10 7 6 3
♥ 2
♦ A 9 8 5
♣ Q 9 4 |
♠ K 9 5 2
♥ 8 5 4 3
♦ K Q 10
♣ J 10 |
| South |
♠ A 8 4
♥ A Q 9 7
♦ 7 3
♣ A 8 6 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♣ |
Pass |
1 ♦ |
Pass |
| 1 ♥ |
Pass |
3 ♠ * |
Pass |
| 4 ♣ |
Pass |
4 ♥ |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
*splinter in support of hearts
♠J
Your partner should have extra values and something very close to a 5=3=1=4 pattern. My guess as to our side’s best game is four hearts – though it may be more challenging to play than the 4-4 club fit. Regardless, I would raise to four hearts, and let partner retreat to the club game if he doesn’t want to play hearts.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ Q
♥ K J 10 6
♦ Q 6 4 2
♣ K 7 5 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
2 ♣ |
Pass |
| 3 ♣ |
Pass |
3 ♥ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
|
In today’s deal from a team game, both declarers reached four spades and received a trump lead.
At one table South decided to play for club ruffs. He won the first trick with the jack from dummy, and played a club to his queen. West returned a second trump after winning the club ace, East pitching the diamond two. South won in hand and ruffed a club, then had to decide how to return to hand.
Believing his opponents’ signals, he crossed to the diamond ace, then ruffed his last club, and now carefully played ace and a second heart. Had he played a diamond first, West would have won his king and led a heart, and could not then have been denied a diamond ruff. As it was, South could subsequently ruff a heart high to hand and draw the last trump, for 10 tricks.
South was optimistic about his chances of a swing, but in the other room declarer won the first spade in hand and ducked a heart. East won to play a diamond, and declarer finessed unsuccessfully. That let West play a second trump. South won the spade in hand to play the heart ace and ruff a heart high, then used the trump entry to dummy to ruff out hearts. He could later ruff one club loser in dummy and pitch one on the fifth heart, to score six trump tricks, two hearts, and two diamonds.
If defenders had won the diamond king to play back a club instead, South could have ruffed two clubs in dummy to come to 10 tricks.