Aces on Bridge — Daily Columns

The Aces on Bridge: Sunday, January 15th, 2017

Recently, I have observed many top pairs using a no-trump range of 14-16. Is this done to increase the frequency of opening with that call, or to allow other opening bids to be adjusted down by one point? And do you have an opinion on this lower range?

Weight Lifter, Phoenix, Ariz.

Using the lower range lets you open all balanced 11 counts if you wish. The logic behind having a three-point range for the no-trump opening (be it 12-14, 15-17, or 16-18) is that responder can clarify if opener has a minimum or maximum by inviting. It makes sense for your opening and no-trump rebids each to be three points wide. Of course opening these 11-counts requires you to be more disciplined in inviting or driving to game. Easier said than done.

When looking for an old Aces column I found this source of back hands online: http://aces.bridgeblogging.com/. It appears it is two weeks behind, right? In other words, one cannot retrieve a current deal for a fortnight?

Little Engine, Atlanta, Ga.

Yes; the idea is that the column can only be read timeously in the paper not online. This is a very generous service offered by the syndicator – and I hope it is a way to read the column outside the United States.

I was at favorable vulnerability playing teams when my LHO opened two hearts. I held: ♠ J-4, K-Q-7-4, A-9, ♣ A-Q-74-2. What would you consider the relative merits of balancing with three clubs or two no-trump, or of doubling?

Aces and Spaces, Massapequa, N.Y.

Bidding two no-trump to show a strong no-trump is the mainstream action, and I might do it even if there are many ways that the call could rebound on you. the problem with a call of three clubs is that partner isn’t likely to head for three no-trump. Since doubling is impossible, I think passing at this specific vulnerability might be our best chance to go plus. If we make three no-trump, won’t we collect 300 or so?

I had an opening lead problem against one no-trump, passed out. We were vulnerable, our opponents not, and I held ♠ K-Q- 3-2, Q-10-8-3, -9 4 ♣ 9 6 5. As a couple of subsidiary questions, would you lead differently if LHO had raised to three no-trump? And does the presence or absence of the heart eight affect your lead.

Robber Baron, East Brunswick, N.J.

The heart eight does not affect my choice, but the presence of the heart 10 makes me think a heart lead is better than a spade against either partscore or game. I’m not sure I can explain why except that with the spade ace likely on my right I’m jeopardizing a ‘sure’ trick by leading that suit. Without the heart 10, it is a toss-up.

You recently wrote about second degree assumptions as declarer. This is not a concept I am familiar, with so any help would be appreciated.

Milkman Mike, Mitchell, S.D.

Terence Reese was the first person I know of to discuss the idea of placing the cards that were missing (either onside if you were in optimistic contract or offside if you were in a good one) so as to decide how to play a two-way finesse. This is discussed in Master Play but there are many other books he wrote that should help you in this area.


For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog.
Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2017. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Saturday, January 14th, 2017

History teaches us that men and nations behave wisely once they have exhausted all other alternatives.

Abba Eban


S North
E-W ♠ J 7 5 4
 A 9 6 5 2
 8 6 3
♣ 9
West East
♠ 10 9 8
 J 4
 K 7
♣ A J 8 5 3 2
♠ 3
 K Q 10 8
 10 9 5 4 2
♣ K 10 7
South
♠ A K Q 6 2
 7 3
 A Q J
♣ Q 6 4
South West North East
1 ♠ 2 ♣ 2 ♠ 3 ♣
4 ♠ All pass    

♠10

In today’s deal from a team game, both declarers reached four spades and received a trump lead.

At one table South decided to play for club ruffs. He won the first trick with the jack from dummy, and played a club to his queen. West returned a second trump after winning the club ace, East pitching the diamond two. South won in hand and ruffed a club, then had to decide how to return to hand.

Believing his opponents’ signals, he crossed to the diamond ace, then ruffed his last club, and now carefully played ace and a second heart. Had he played a diamond first, West would have won his king and led a heart, and could not then have been denied a diamond ruff. As it was, South could subsequently ruff a heart high to hand and draw the last trump, for 10 tricks.

South was optimistic about his chances of a swing, but in the other room declarer won the first spade in hand and ducked a heart. East won to play a diamond, and declarer finessed unsuccessfully. That let West play a second trump. South won the spade in hand to play the heart ace and ruff a heart high, then used the trump entry to dummy to ruff out hearts. He could later ruff one club loser in dummy and pitch one on the fifth heart, to score six trump tricks, two hearts, and two diamonds.

If defenders had won the diamond king to play back a club instead, South could have ruffed two clubs in dummy to come to 10 tricks.



This is the perfect hand for Crawling Stayman – also inelegantly referred to as Garbage Stayman. Your plan when you bid two clubs is to pass a response in a major, or to correct two diamonds to two hearts. That shows both majors and a weak hand, with something less than invitational values.

BID WITH THE ACES

♠ J 7 5 4
 A 9 6 5 2
 8 6 3
♣ 9
South West North East
  Pass 1 NT Pass
?      

For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog. Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2017. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Friday, January 13th, 2017

The player on the other side is hidden from us. We know that his play is always fair, just, and patient.

Thomas Huxley


S North
E-W ♠ Q J 5
 8 6 5 2
 A 5 3
♣ K Q J
West East
♠ 7 6 2
 K Q J
 Q 10 8 6 4
♣ 9 5
♠ 8 3
 A 10 9 7 3
 9 7
♣ 10 7 4 2
South
♠ A K 10 9 4
 4
 K J 2
♣ A 8 6 3
South West North East
1 ♠ Pass 2 ♣ Pass
3 * Pass 3 ♠ Pass
4 ♣ Pass 4 NT Pass
5 ♣ ** Pass 6 ♠ All pass
       

*shortage **three key cards

K

Today’s deal is very satisfying, in that it illustrates the benefits of Bobby Fischer’s line about strategy at chess. When you find a good line, look for a better one. In today’s deal there was a decent and straightforward line, and a less obvious and better one. Fittingly, the cards rewarded the better play.

When the deal came up, both tables in a team game played in six spades. West had been dealt an apparently attractive top heart lead, though in retrospect he would have done better to lead clubs.

The auction having shown there was no future in hearts, both Wests shifted to clubs at trick two. One declarer drew trump and took the diamond finesse, and his 50 percent line did not come home.

In the other room South won the club king, and ruffed a heart to hand. Now he played the spade ace and a spade to the queen, relieved to see the break would allow him to take a second heart ruff. (Had spades not broken, he would have drawn trump and reverted to the diamond finesse.)

Now it was crucial to go back to dummy with a club (to stop anyone discarding from a doubleton) for the third heart ruff. South could next lead a diamond to the ace, draw the last trump with the spade jack, discarding his diamond loser, and claim the rest.

He had taken three trumps in dummy, three ruffs in hand, two diamonds and four clubs – a perfect example of a dummy reversal, in which the short hand draws trump.



Everyone ought to define what is the weakest action in an auction when a cuebid that forces the partnership to a specific level (here two spades) is doubled. Does a pass or reversion to two spades show a weaker hand? I suggest always using reversion to the trump suit as weakest. That being so, I would redouble two diamonds to suggest the ace, and let partner make the running from here.

BID WITH THE ACES

♠ Q J 5
 8 6 5 2
 A 5 3
♣ K Q J
South West North East
  1 1 ♠ Dbl.
2 Dbl. Pass Pass
?      

For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog. Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2017. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Thursday, January 12th, 2017

This shows how much easier it is to be critical than to be correct.

Benjamin Disraeli


S North
E-W ♠ Q J 4
 K 7
 Q 10 8 5 2
♣ 8 6 4
West East
♠ 8 2
 J 8 6 5 4 3 2
 K 4
♣ 7 3
♠ K 10 9 7 5
 9
 A 7
♣ K 10 9 5 2
South
♠ A 6 3
 A Q 10
 J 9 6 3
♣ A Q J
South West North East
1 Pass 2 2 ♠
2 NT Pass 3 NT All pass
       

♠8

Eighty years ago the Culbertson organization was the dominant one in bridge, and because it published the Bridge World it would frequently distribute deals played by Eli or his wife Josephine. However, they miscalculated when they complimented Josephine Culbertson for her play on this hand.

The auction posed South a real problem at her second turn; it might easily have been right to get partner to declare no-trump, but South bit the bullet and opted for the nine-trick game her way up.

Against three no-trump West obediently led his partner’s suit. Josephine Culbertson reportedly called for dummy’s jack and ducked East’s spade king. Now the defenders could lead a second spade, but West had no spade to play when in with the diamond king.

No mention was made of the fact that East had missed the correct defense of ducking the first round of spades. Now when West takes the diamond king and plays back a spade, declarer is toast.

Equally, it may be slightly less obvious, but declarer should have played low from dummy and from hand on the first spade — relying on split diamond honors. Then, no defense beats three no-trump. This idea of ducking the first spade applies equally well if the same contract is reached by North on either a low spade lead to the eight, or the 10 passed round to North. Ducking works equally well in this case too – but is no easier to spot.


Even though your queens are in the suits where partner rates to be short, and so may not be pulling their full weight, you are not ashamed of your hand. So it feels right to give false preference to two hearts, and keep the auction open in case partner is about to show extras. Were the heart king the jack, I might consider passing two clubs.

BID WITH THE ACES

♠ Q J 4
 K 7
 Q 10 8 5 2
♣ 8 6 4
South West North East
  Pass 1 Pass
1 NT Pass 2 ♣ Pass
?      

For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog. Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2017. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Wednesday, October 11th, 2017

What a word is truth. Slippery, tricky, unreliable. I tried in these books to tell the truth.

Lilian Hellman


S North
N-S ♠ A K 9
 K 10 2
 7 6 2
♣ A Q 4 2
West East
♠ 8 6 5 3
 6 5
 Q 9 8 3
♣ J 10 9
♠ Q J 10 4 2
 8 7 4
 10
♣ K 8 6 5
South
♠ 7
 A Q J 9 3
 A K J 5 4
♣ 7 3
South West North East
1 Pass 2 ♣ Pass
2 Pass 3 Pass
4 Pass 4 NT Pass
5 ♠ Pass 5 NT Pass
6 Pass 6 All pass
       

♣J

In today’s deal North tries for a grand slam but signs off in six hearts when South cannot bid more than six diamonds over the five no-trump enquiry. (South would have done more with the diamond queen instead of the jack).

When West leads the club jack, South wins the ace and takes one top diamond. If no large diamond appears on his right or left, declarer might well simply draw all the trumps and play a second diamond to the jack. This line would succeed unless East had begun with a singleton diamond.

However, when the diamond 10 appears from East, South decides to take it at face value. He draws two rounds of trump ending in dummy, cashes two spades to pitch his club loser, then leads a diamond toward his own hand, while leaving one trump outstanding.

If East discards on the second diamond, South will win with the king, and give up a diamond. This leaves him in position to ruff a fourth diamond with dummy’s high trump.

However, since nothing can be gained by discarding, East ruffs the second round of diamonds and plays back a spade. South trumps, and can cash the diamond king, then ruff a diamond for his contract.

As an aside, maybe West could persuade you to go wrong if he started life with Q-10-9-3 by dropping the 10 on the first round? You might then draw all the trump before playing a second diamond, and be left with two diamond losers.


You may be tempted to pass, and I might indeed break partnership discipline to do that if slightly weaker. However, this auction is technically forcing. On this sequence, it is modern practice to play the call of two spades as natural but not promising or denying extra values, forcing for one round. So your plan would be to bid two spades, and pass any non-forcing continuation partner produces.

BID WITH THE ACES

♠ Q J 10 4 2
 8 7 4
 10
♣ K 8 6 5
South West North East
  Pass 1 Pass
1 ♠ Pass 2 Pass
?      

For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog.
Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2017. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Wednesday, January 11th, 2017

Free speech is meant to protect unpopular speech. Popular speech, by definition, needs no protection.

Neal Boortz


S North
N-S ♠ 10 9 7
 K 10 5
 K Q 10 5 4
♣ K 8
West East
♠ K Q J 6 2
 8 6 2
 9 7
♣ J 10 4
♠ 8 4
 7 4
 A J 3
♣ Q 9 7 6 3 2
South
♠ A 5 3
 A Q J 9 3
 8 6 2
♣ A 5
South West North East
1 1 ♠ 2 Pass
2 Pass 3 Pass
3 ♠ Pass 4 All pass
       

♠K

Most US experts play two over one as game forcing. But in competitive auctions two over one at the two level should not be forcing to game. It should show values but does not guarantee a rebid – anything that sounds non-forcing thereafter should be non-forcing.

Thus in today’s auction North’s raise to three hearts could be passed. South might well bid three no-trump over three hearts, (though it isn’t clear which game is best – it depends on who has the diamond ace).

Against four hearts West leads a top spade, and South has to guess whether to win or duck. He does well to hold up, to cut the defenders’ communications. If West continues spades, declarer wins, and lead a diamond to dummy’s king and comes to 10 tricks relatively easily.

But West does better to shift to a club at trick two, attacking declarer’s late entry for the diamonds. Declarer wins in hand and leads a diamond to the king, ducked by East. Now declarer draws two rounds of trump with the king and ace and leads a diamond to the 10 and jack. Back comes a second club, and declarer must win in dummy and lead a third diamond, subsequently using dummy’s last trump as the entry for the diamonds.

If East plays back a spade not a club after winning the diamond jack, declarer takes this in hand and must draw the last trump – if he plays the third diamond before doing so, West ruffs his partner’s winner to cash a spade for down one.



Your partner’s double is value showing, maybe in terms of high cards, a minimum of an eight-count? He typically has a doubleton heart and suggests length in the other suits. I would pass and lead a trump; where are the opponents going to score tricks except from the trump suit?

BID WITH THE ACES

♠ A 10 5
 A Q J 9 3
 8 6 2
♣ A 5
South West North East
      2
2 3 Dbl. Pass
?      

For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog. Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2017. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Tuesday, January 10th, 2017

No idea is so modern that it will not someday be antiquated.

Ellen Glasgow


S North
E-W ♠ J 6 3 2
 8
 A Q 10 7 5
♣ 6 5 3
West East
♠ 9
 A K J 10 7
 8 6 3
♣ K J 8 4
♠ 7 4
 6 5 4 3
 J 9 4 2
♣ A 9 7
South
♠ A K Q 10 8 5
 Q 9 2
 K
♣ Q 10 2
South West North East
1 ♠ 2 3 Pass
4 ♠ All pass    

K

One of the most difficult and controversial areas of bridge is how to signal in a suit contract at trick one when an honor is led that will hold the trick, while dummy puts down a singleton.

There are two schools of thought: for what it is worth, I am closer to the first position, but the second is more popular. The first says “Signal attitude in the usual fashion if continuation is possibly correct. Only if continuation makes no sense do you use suit preference, low for the lower possible suit, high for the higher.”

The second more mainstream school suggests that everything is about suit preference when there are two possible suits to shift to. But if there is only one possible shift, encouraging the opening lead says don’t shift to the obvious suit.

In today’s deal West leads the heart king against four spades, and the singleton in dummy should affect what East’s signals ought to mean.

Here he should play the heart three, suggesting a high honor in clubs – clearly the ace from West’s point of view. So West shifts to the club four and the defense takes the next three tricks with the club ace, jack and king.

By contrast if East had the diamonds under control and no club honor he would follow with a high heart at trick one, and West could exit in diamonds. That would allow the defenders to collect whatever winners they are entitled to in due course.



Although the jump to three spades does not definitively lock spades into being trumps, it suggests at most a one-loser suit. The four heart call is still technically consistent with a hand with 5-6 in the reds, but sounds more like a cuebid for spades with no club control. So you should bid four spades now.

BID WITH THE ACES

♠ A K Q 10 8 5
 Q 9 2
 K
♣ Q 10 2
South West North East
1 ♠ Pass 2 Pass
3 ♠ Pass 4 Pass
?      

For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog. Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2017. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Monday, January 9th, 2017

It is a place with only one post a day…In the country I always fear that creation will expire before tea-time.

Sydney Smith


S North
Both ♠ K J 2
 K 5
 A 10 7 5 4
♣ 8 3 2
West East
♠ 9 6 3
 J 10 9 7
 K J
♣ Q 6 5 4
♠ 8
 A Q 8 4 2
 Q 9 6 2
♣ J 10 9
South
♠ A Q 10 7 5 4
 6 3
 8 3
♣ A K 7
South West North East
1 ♠ Pass 1 NT* Pass
2 ♠ Pass 4 ♠ All pass

*forcing

J

After South opens one spade, North is too strong to raise to two spades but is not quite right for a limit raise to three spades. He plans to describe this hand by first bidding a forcing no-trump, then raising to three spades. However, when South shows a sixth spade, North should just up and bid game. A raise to three spades would be right were the spade jack the club jack.

After East wins the first two hearts and shifts to a club, South wins and can see he might lose two hearts, one diamond and one club. His best chance is to establish a long diamond, which will be easy if diamonds split three-three. But if they split four-two, dummy’s entries must be handled carefully.

South must duck a diamond at trick four. When West wins and returns a club, South can afford to cash only one high spade from his hand, since dummy’s trumps will be needed for entries to the diamonds. He then leads a diamond to the ace, ruffs a diamond high, leads a trump to dummy, ruffs another diamond high, and leads one more trump to dummy.

Trump having finally been drawn, South is in dummy where he wants to be, to cash the long diamond for his 10th trick.

Note that if South draws even one round of trump before ducking the diamond, the defense could then play a second round of spades, using up one of dummy’s entries prematurely. In turn, the defenders could set the game by shifting to trump at trick three.


Since the opponents appear to have about 24 HCP between them, to have invited game and stopped in two no-trump, you can tell that marks partner with a relatively light overcall. The lighter his hand, the more likely that he has a decent spade suit. So I would lead my singleton, rather than getting aggressive and leading a club. The spade won’t do anything for declarer that he can’t do for himself.

LEAD WITH THE ACES

♠ 7
 Q 9 7 3 2
 K 5
♣ Q 9 7 4 3
South West North East
      1
Pass 1 1 ♠ 1 NT
Pass 2 NT All pass  

For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog. Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2017. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Sunday, January 8th, 2017

Playing duplicate pairs, when I heard an opening bid of one spade on my right I elected to pass with a 3-4-2-4 12-count. I thought double would be too risky, though this decision was later criticized. When my LHO bid one no-trump and my RHO bid two diamonds, could I have doubled now? As it turned out, we can make two hearts and they can make two diamonds.

Judgment of Paris, Park City, Utah

Your initial pass is perfectly fine; if you double (I might) it runs the risk of partner going overboard in diamonds, or of your walking into a large penalty. At your second turn a take-out double was risky but not entirely unreasonable. Your shape was acceptable so if you had ace-queen fourth in both unbid suits you might gamble it – but it is risky.

As a recent bidding problem you posed the following hand for responder, ♠ A-K-4-3, K-Q-2, 8-2, ♣ Q-7-64, on the unopposed sequence: one diamond – one spade – two clubs. You recommend the fourth suit as a game force and then to raise clubs at the three level. But you can only do that if your partner bids two spades or two no-trump. What do you do if partner bids a minor next?

Till Eulenspiegel, Sacramento, Calif.

I think I would rebid three no-trump over three diamonds, but over three clubs I would raise to four. I appreciate that I may miss playing no-trump, and be forcing my partner to the five level, so at pairs the decision would be VERY tough.

At a recent session of rubber bridge there were a few throw-ins, where everybody passed. During the postmortem it was observed that we rarely see or hear about this happening to experts. My question is, how rare is this at duplicate? And are you allowed to re-deal a hand that is thrown in on the first round of a duplicate event?

The Great Shuffler, Richmond, Va.

I wouldn’t say rare, but my experience is that third in hand so often stretches to open on a deal where he has 10/11 points, that the number of pass-outs has dropped dramatically from 40 years ago. And so many 11-counts are opened systemically that I don’t see a pass-out more than once a month. Re-deals are never permitted, by the way.

My partner and I play two-over-one. Recently, she had a good hand (16 or so points) with five spades and five hearts. I had 11 points with two small spades and three hearts, and responded with a forcing no-trump to one spade. When she bid two hearts, I took her for only four hearts and bid two no-trump. When she subsequently re-bid spades, I raised to game in spades. That went down one, while four hearts would have made easily. She told me her heart bid in that sequence meant she had five hearts. Is that right?

Shape Shifter, North Bay, Ontario

After your response of one no-trump your partner’s two heart call is quite consistent with only four. If she rebids her hearts that shows 5-5 in the majors, which would accurately have described her shape, if not her assets, since it suggests a minimum hand and is non-forcing over a two no-trump rebid. To show a good hand with this pattern it might be better to bid a doubleton minor to dredge up three-card support for hearts or spades from you.

I had a hand with two aces and my partner was upset that I opened two hearts. Vulnerable, I had: ♠ 9-4-2, Q-9-6-5-4-3, A-4, ♣ A-J. I did not count the club jack as pulling its weight, so given the vulnerability, I decided to go low. I made my contract, which got me a top, as most pairs ended up in game down one or two.

Heads Up, Cheyenne, Wyo.

You don’t want to open a weak two with tricks on the side and a feeble suit. When deciding whether to open, my rule is to add up my points, then add one for any five-card suit, two for a six-card suit, and one for any side four-card suit. If it comes to 13, I open at the one level, unless I have less than an ace and king on defense. This hand qualifies a sound one-level opener. And as an aside: never pass a hand with a good suit; open one, two or three.


For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog.
Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2017. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Saturday, January 7th, 2017

I know enough of the world now to have almost lost the capacity of being much surprised by anything.

Charles Dickens


S North
E-W ♠ Q
 K J 10 6
 J 6 4 2
♣ K 7 5 3
West East
♠ J 10 7 6 3
 2
 A 9 8 5
♣ Q 9 4
♠ K 9 5 2
 8 5 4 3
 K Q 10
♣ J 10
South
♠ A 8 4
 A Q 9 7
 7 3
♣ A 8 6 2
South West North East
1 ♣ Pass 1 Pass
1 Pass 3 ♠ * Pass
4 ♣ Pass 4 All pass
       

*splinter in support of hearts

♠J

As South in four hearts you can see you have one club and two diamonds losers off the top. Your first instinct might be to go for spade ruffs in dummy, but the problem with re-entries to hand makes this awkward.

Imagine you ruff a spade in dummy, cross to your club winner and ruff a second spade. So far so good; but when you draw trump, the bad break means you will never establish your long club.

Curiously, you can survive a 4-1 trump break, but not a 4-1 club break, when you would simply have four top minor-suit losers. Once you spot this, you may see the winning line of taking your spade ace and ducking a club at trick two. This allows you to be more flexible by retaining club entries to both hands.

If the defenders play on diamonds, you ruff two diamonds in hand, drawing trump with dummy’s excellent spots. If they play on spades, you ruff two spades in dummy, making South the master hand.

Equally, if the defense returns hearts, you win in hand, ruff a spade, return to hand with a trump, and ruff a second spade. That lets you play a club to your hand, draw trump and concede two diamonds at the end for 10 tricks.

The lesson of this hand is that when you have a 4-4 trump fit, you do not have to decide on the master hand immediately. You may need to wait until you have set up your ruffs. Equally, remember to protect your entries to retain trump control.



Your partner should have extra values and something very close to a 5=3=1=4 pattern. My guess as to our side’s best game is four hearts – though it may be more challenging to play than the 4-4 club fit. Regardless, I would raise to four hearts, and let partner retreat to the club game if he doesn’t want to play hearts.

BID WITH THE ACES

♠ Q
 K J 10 6
 Q 6 4 2
♣ K 7 5 3
South West North East
  Pass 1 ♠ Pass
1 NT Pass 2 ♣ Pass
3 ♣ Pass 3 Pass
?      

For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog. Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2017. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].