January 11th, 2017 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 5 Comments
When people will not weed their own minds, they are apt to be overrun by nettles.
Horace Walpole
| S |
North |
| Both |
♠ 8 6 5 2
♥ J 10 8
♦ A K Q 3
♣ Q 5 |
| West |
East |
♠ K 4
♥ K 7 5 3
♦ 8 6 2
♣ 10 9 8 6 |
♠ A Q J 3
♥ 9 4
♦ J 10 9 4
♣ 7 4 3 |
| South |
♠ 10 9 7
♥ A Q 6 2
♦ 7 5
♣ A K J 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♣* |
Pass |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
*Two + cards
♣10
I don’t think you are really worth responding one no-trump here. From my own experience, when facing a third in hand opener I like to be full value for this call (I’d say the range was a good seven to a bad 10). While you might find that the consequence of passing was to miss a partscore, there is a lot to be said for waiting for one round before deciding whose hand it really is.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K 4
♥ K 7 5 3
♦ 8 6 2
♣ 10 9 8 6 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| Pass |
Pass |
1 ♠ |
Dbl. |
| ? |
|
|
|
January 10th, 2017 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 8 Comments
You gotta have a swine to show you where the truffles are.
Edward Albee
| N |
North |
| None |
♠ 5 4 3
♥ A J 10 6 4
♦ 5 3 2
♣ Q 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ 10 9 8
♥ K 7 3
♦ 10 9 7
♣ J 9 7 6 |
♠ J 7 6
♥ Q 9 2
♦ Q J 6 4
♣ K 10 5 |
| South |
♠ A K Q 2
♥ 8 5
♦ A K 8
♣ A 8 4 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
Pass |
Pass |
| 2 NT |
Pass |
3 ♦* |
Pass |
| 3 ♥ |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
*Hearts
♠10
First things first: your partner’s double is not penalty. It shows real extras, typically with three hearts. In context you might have enough to jump to four hearts now, or cuebid three diamonds en route to a game in no-trump or hearts. A more cautious approach would be to bid just three hearts, I suppose.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 5 4 3
♥ A J 10 6 4
♦ 5 3 2
♣ Q 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| Pass |
1 ♦ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| 1 ♥ |
2 ♦ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
January 9th, 2017 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 10 Comments
Death is the privilege of human nature, And life without it were not worth our taking.
Nicholas Rowe
| E |
North |
| Both |
♠ K 5 2
♥ 6 5 4
♦ A 6
♣ J 10 9 5 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ 10 9 6
♥ Q 9
♦ K J 8 4 2
♣ K 6 4 |
♠ J 8 7 4 3
♥ K J 10 8 3
♦ Q 10
♣ 8 |
| South |
♠ A Q
♥ A 7 2
♦ 9 7 5 3
♣ A Q 7 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
Pass |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♦4
The no-trump calls to your right should not unduly alarm you. Lead your long suit, the one you know partner has at least some length in, rather than experimenting with either minor suit – each of which could score a goal, or an own goal.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ K Q 2
♥ J 7 5 3
♦ J 6 4
♣ 5 3 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| Pass |
1 ♠ |
Dbl. |
1 NT |
| 2 ♥ |
Pass |
Pass |
2 NT |
| All pass |
|
|
|
January 8th, 2017 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 9 Comments
|
I’m confused about the nature of a positive response to an opening two club bid. In one of your recent columns, the responder had 12 points and a five-card spade suit. Why did he not bid two spades? Did he need a better suit?
Field of Dreams, Houston, Texas
I’ll tell you where I stand – but not everyone agrees. A two heart response never preempts partner from his intended call. So I often bid that with positive values and a moderate suit – not necessarily two top honors. A two spade response needs a decent suit, since we may have stopped partner from rebidding hearts at a convenient level. I suggest you use minor-suit responses for unbalanced hands with good suits, and the meaning for two no-trumps…is up to you.
My wife and I read your column to try to improve our bridge. A few weeks ago we saw a hand where one player heard his partner open one spade and the next hand doubled. North had 10 points and four spades; what is the full message intended by his two no-trump response? (My response would have been three spades, by the way!).
Muddy Waters, Portland, Maine
After a double of partner’s major suit, it is sensible to try to keep the opponents out by jump raising his major with a weak hand. In turn, that requires you to be able to use a different call for the limit raise, since the jump raise is no longer available. With redouble showing a strong balanced hand, two no-trump is not needed as natural. Hence you re-direct that call to be at least a limit raise in spades. This convention may be referred to as Jordan or Truscott.
We play a penalty double of the opponents’ one no-trump opener, whether it is weak or strong. Given that you can pass in response to that double with values, with a weak hand should you play a conventional scheme of response or just play natural? And what if the opponents run from one no-trump?
Wellington Boot, Casper, Wyo.
|
I suggest you play Stayman and transfers in response to partner’s double of either a strong or a weak no-trump for penalty. Even with a good, shapely hand you may prefer to describe your hand, and not just to sit for the double. I don’t always play a penalty double of a strong no-trump, but if I did I might play transfers and Stayman there too. When they run, treat your first double as you would the intervention over your no-trump opener.
Recently one of my opponents played through an entire hand before discovering that they had started with only 12 cards, and a diamond was under the previous table. The director said there was no penalty. Is that correct?
Number Cruncher, Woodland Hills, Calif.
When you fail to notice a missing card your revoke, if any, should be punished by the laws in normal fashion. The penalty may be one or two tricks – depending in part on whether the offender personally won the revoke trick – and on how many tricks were won after the revoke.
A couple of weeks ago you answered a question of mine – now I’m giving you the matching hand to that problem. With both sides vulnerable, you hold ♠ A-5, ♥ J-5-4, ♦ Q-8-5-2, ♣ Q-J-7-5. Assuming you pass, what would you bid if partner doubled a one diamond opener, and what would you bid if a one diamond opener was passed round to you?
Elevator, Wausau, Wis.
In balancing seat you cannot double, so the choice is to bid one no-trump or pass. I’d bid if the opponents were non-vulnerable, pass if they were vulnerable. Over my partner’s double, a call of one no-trump looks unexceptionable.
|
January 7th, 2017 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 10 Comments
There was a long hard time when I kept far from me the remembrance of what I had thrown away when I was quite ignorant of its worth.
Charles Dickens
| N |
North |
| N-S |
♠ Q 9
♥ J 9 6 5
♦ J 9 8
♣ J 8 7 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ 5 4
♥ A Q 3 2
♦ 3 2
♣ Q 10 9 6 3 |
♠ J 10 8 7 3 2
♥ 8 7
♦ A 6 5 4
♣ K |
| South |
♠ A K 6
♥ K 10 4
♦ K Q 10 7
♣ A 5 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
Pass |
2 ♠ |
| 3 NT |
All pass |
|
|
♣6
My simple agreement with all my partners about what doubles mean after our side opens one no-trump is as follows. If the only call our partnership has made is to pass, the first double is take-out from either player, whether over or under the suit bid or shown. So here the double of two diamonds is for take-out, and you have a painless call of two hearts.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 9
♥ J 9 6 5
♦ J 9 8
♣ J 8 7 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
1 NT |
Pass |
| Pass |
2 ♦ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
January 6th, 2017 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 3 Comments
The Brain is wider than the Sky – For put them side by side – The one the other will contain With ease –and You – beside.
Emily Dickinson
| N |
North |
| Both |
♠ —
♥ 10 6 5
♦ K 10 8 7 4
♣ A K 10 6 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ K Q J 7 5 2
♥ 8 7 3 2
♦ 2
♣ J 3 |
♠ 8 4 3
♥ K Q J 9
♦ A J 9
♣ 9 7 5 |
| South |
♠ A 10 9 6
♥ A 4
♦ Q 6 5 3
♣ Q 8 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
Pass |
1 ♥ |
| Dbl. |
2 ♠* |
3 ♥ |
Pass |
| 3 NT |
Pass |
4 ♥ |
Pass |
| 5 ♦ |
All pass |
|
|
*Fit showing
♠K
It never does any harm to go over the basics once in a while. A jump to two no-trump is natural and invitational, and describes your values perfectly. In fact with none of your values in partner’s suits, I would not be surprised to discover that if partner passes, we may be too high already. But you can hardly do less. If you wanted to force to game, you would use the fourth suit or jump to three no-trump.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 8 4 3
♥ K Q J 9
♦ A J 9
♣ 9 7 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
1 ♣ |
Pass |
| 1 ♥ |
Pass |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
January 5th, 2017 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 3 Comments
I do not know which makes a man more conservative – to know nothing but the present, or nothing but the past.
J. M. Keynes
| W |
North |
| N-S |
♠ K 7 5 4 3
♥ K J
♦ K J 9 8 5
♣ J |
| West |
East |
♠ J 10 2
♥ 6 4 3
♦ A 7 4
♣ A 7 6 3 |
♠ Q 8 6
♥ 10 9
♦ Q 10 3 2
♣ Q 10 9 2 |
| South |
♠ A 9
♥ A Q 8 7 5 2
♦ 6
♣ K 8 5 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
| 2 ♥ |
Pass |
2 ♠ |
Pass |
| 3 ♣ |
Pass |
3 ♥ |
Pass |
| 4 ♥ |
All pass |
|
|
Fill in the blank…
You may not have much of a hand, but what you have seems to be working for your partner – and you have already showed a poor hand at your first two turns. I’m guessing that if partner wants to bid five of a minor to make or as a sacrifice, you have a good hand for him. I would bid four clubs to let him in on the double fit.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 8 6
♥ 10 9
♦ Q 10 3 2
♣ Q 10 9 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| Pass |
Pass |
1 ♦ |
Dbl. |
| 2 ♦ |
2 ♥ |
3 ♣ |
3 ♥ |
| ? |
|
|
|
January 4th, 2017 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
I’m not big on reading directions. I can’t do that. I’m just not from that world.
Richard Dean Anderson
| S |
North |
| None |
♠ A J 9 4 2
♥ J 10 7 3
♦ J 4
♣ 7 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ 5
♥ Q 9 2
♦ Q 8 6 5
♣ A 10 9 8 4 |
♠ 8 7 6 3
♥ A K
♦ 10 9 3
♣ K Q 6 3 |
| South |
♠ K Q 10
♥ 8 6 5 4
♦ A K 7 2
♣ J 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♥ |
Pass |
2 ♥ |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♠5
There are two schools of thought here. One transfers to two spades, one uses Stayman, planning to rebid two spades over two diamonds to show a shapely invitation with five spades. That is a fractional overbid, but I would be prepared to follow that route, to make sure we reached the best major suit for partscore or game.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A J 9 4 2
♥ J 10 7 3
♦ J 4
♣ 7 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
1 NT |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
January 3rd, 2017 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Tuesday, December 20th, 2016
Undoubtedly we have no questions to ask which are unanswerable.
Ralph Waldo Emerson
| W |
North |
| E-W |
♠ 4
♥ A Q J 10 4
♦ 6 5
♣ Q J 6 4 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q 5
♥ 9 6 3
♦ K Q 10 8 7
♣ A K 8 |
♠ K J 8 7 2
♥ 8 7 5 2
♦ A 3
♣ 10 5 |
| South |
♠ A 10 9 6 3
♥ K
♦ J 9 4 2
♣ 9 7 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♦ |
2 NT* |
Pass |
| 3 ♣ |
All pass |
|
|
*Hearts and clubs
♦K
You were not planning to compete beyond the two-level. You can be pushed up one level but no more, so should not bid four spades. Can you beat four hearts? I’d expect the contract to be close but if it does make, four spades rates to be down at least two – and probably doubled, to boot. Pass out four hearts and take your chances. (If partner had opened one diamond you might well bid on, though.)
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A 10 9 6 3
♥ K
♦ J 9 4 2
♣ 9 7 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♣ |
Pass |
| 1 ♠ |
Dbl. |
2 ♠ |
4 ♥ |
| ? |
|
|
|
January 2nd, 2017 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 13 Comments
The past is the only dead thing that smells sweet.
Edward Thomas
| W |
North |
| N-S |
♠ 10 6 3
♥ Q 8 2
♦ Q 10 9 6 2
♣ A 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q 5 4
♥ 10 5
♦ J 8 7
♣ K 10 6 5 2 |
♠ A 9 7 2
♥ K J 6 4 3
♦ 3
♣ J 7 4 |
| South |
♠ K J 8
♥ A 9 7
♦ A K 5 4
♣ Q 9 8 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
Pass |
1 ♥ |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♥10
Declarer surely rates to be shapely, with a void or all the first round controls as he did not use Blackwood. So the question is whether to go active with a diamond lead, or passive with a spade or club lead. The bad heart break argues for going passive. I think I’d lead a trump, and maybe a deceptive club nine might cause some confusion?
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ J 9 3
♥ J 10 6 3
♦ K J 4
♣ 10 9 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
Pass |
1 ♥ |
| Pass |
2 ♥ |
Pass |
3 ♣ |
| Pass |
4 ♣ |
Pass |
6 ♣ |
| All pass |
|
|
|
|
As West you are playing teams, using standard leads and signals. Against three no-trump you lead the club 10, since South has not promised real clubs. Declarer plays the queen from dummy and overtakes with the king as partner follows with the three. Now comes a low diamond to dummy and declarer advances the heart jack.
On this trick East plays the heart nine under the jack and you win the trick with the king. What next?
West should analyze the hand and try to count declarer’s tricks. Partner’s discouraging club at trick one suggests three club tricks, three diamonds and three heart tricks for declarer. Since East would not follow with the heart nine if he had begun with four, East has to have only two hearts — leaving four hearts for South.
West also knows that East has at least four spades, since South didn’t support that suit. Therefore spades are the only chance for the defense. West must lead out the spade king and return the spade four, hoping to find East with ace-queen-fourth of spades together with the jack 10 or nine, or with four decent spades and the heart ace. Either way, this defense may set up the four additional tricks the defenders need.
Today, the defense takes one heart and four spade tricks to set the contract. This defense may not work but it is the only chance.
Note declarer’s sacrifice of a club winner to try to persuade you to continue the suit; but you didn’t fall for it – did you?