March 3rd, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 5 Comments
Intellectual disgrace Stares from every human face.
W. H. Auden
| S |
North |
| Both |
♠ 6 3
♥ A K 10
♦ J 9 7 3
♣ A J 9 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ A 8 4
♥ 9 7 6 4 3
♦ A 8 4
♣ 10 3 |
♠ 10 9 7 2
♥ 8 5 2
♦ K 6
♣ Q 8 7 6 |
| South |
♠ K Q J 5
♥ Q J
♦ Q 10 5 2
♣ K 5 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♦ |
Pass |
2 ♦* |
Pass |
| 2 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
*Forcing, with diamond support
♥4
I’m often asked what to open with 4-4 in the minors and 12-14 points. My rule is that I bid the better minor, because if I end up defending and partner is on lead, I want him to lead my better suit. Many people will quote you hands where one minor works better than the other – but they miss the point. It is basically a wash: sometimes one suit works, sometimes the other, but good suits never go out of style.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 6 3
♥ A K 10
♦ J 9 7 3
♣ A J 9 4 |
March 2nd, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
A careless shepherd makes an excellent dinner for a wolf.
Earl Derl Biggers
| N |
North |
| None |
♠ Q J 10 7
♥ J 5 2
♦ K Q J 8
♣ A 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ A 9 6
♥ 6 4 3
♦ 6 2
♣ K J 8 7 6 |
♠ 8 5 3
♥ K 9 8 7
♦ 10 7 4 3
♣ Q 10 |
| South |
♠ K 4 2
♥ A Q 10
♦ A 9 5
♣ 9 5 4 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♦ |
Pass |
| 3 NT |
All pass |
|
|
♣7
You are fairly and squarely in the middle of the range for your initial response, of 6-10, and you have no real fit for either of your partner’s suits. The choice seems to be between a call of two no-trump and three notrump, since a three-club rebid might suggest a sub-minimum hand with long clubs. I’ll settle for the two no-trump call, but give me the diamond 10 and I might go high not low.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A 9 6
♥ 6 4 3
♦ 6 2
♣ K J 8 7 6 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♦ |
Pass |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
2 ♥ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
March 1st, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 7 Comments
Look in the almanac; find out moonshine, find out moonshine.
William Shakespeare
| W |
North |
| E-W |
♠ J 9 2
♥ A K Q 10
♦ K J 8
♣ A Q 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ A 8 5 3
♥ J 4 3 2
♦ A Q 7 5
♣ 8 |
♠ Q 10 6
♥ 8 7
♦ 6 3
♣ J 10 7 5 4 2 |
| South |
♠ K 7 4
♥ 9 6 5
♦ 10 9 4 2
♣ K 9 6 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♦ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♠3
If the two no-trump call was natural, we’d simply raise to three no-trump. If two no-trump in the modern-style is a relay to three clubs facing normal values, the Lebensohl convention, usually based on a weak one-suiter, we must cue bid three spades now to show our extras. We hope to reach three no-trump facing a spade stopper. If partner doesn’t have one, we’ll have to play his suit at the four level.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ J 9 2
♥ A K Q 10
♦ K J 8
♣ A Q 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
2 ♠ |
| Dbl. |
Pass |
2 NT |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
February 29th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 5 Comments
Pigeons on the grass alas.
Gertrude Stein
| S |
North |
| None |
♠ 8 7 4
♥ J
♦ K 7 5 2
♣ A Q 9 5 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ J 10 9 2
♥ A 10 8 3 2
♦ 10 9
♣ 6 4 |
♠ Q 6 3
♥ K 7 4
♦ 8 6 4
♣ K 10 7 3 |
| South |
♠ A K 5
♥ Q 9 6 5
♦ A Q J 3
♣ J 8 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♥3
Does responder’s Stayman sequence promise four spades? If not, then I would lead a spade, of course. If dummy rates to have shown four spades, I’ll go passive with a diamond lead. The six may be easier to read than the three, since a low card might suggest real length or an honor, or both.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 9 6 4 3
♥ A 9 6
♦ 6 4 3
♣ 6 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
Pass |
1 NT |
| Pass |
2 ♣ |
Pass |
2 ♥ |
| Pass |
2 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
| All pass |
|
|
|
February 28th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 7 Comments
|
I used to play that the direct cuebid of the suit opened on my right was stronger than a take-out double. I have been told that this is oldfashioned and that such hands can be handled by doubling, then bidding on over a minimum response. Should I learn the Michaels Cuebid, or is there any better possible use for this call?
Mickey Fingers, Albuquerque, N.M.
I recommend the Michaels Cuebid, since you get to describe a potentially awkward hand in one go. (Specifically, the cuebid of a minor-suit opener shows a twosuiter with both majors with 5-5 pattern, the cuebid of a major shows the other major and an unspecified minor). As against that, the call is often misused on hands with weak suits, and is not without risk. For details of how the call works click here.
At duplicate if a board arrives at the table with one or more cards face up, so that an opponent sees the cards what is the tournament director supposed to do?
Turning Turtle, Tupelo, Miss.
The director should instruct the players to continue play, after establishing away from the table with each player who saw what. Unless one side feels that they have been damaged, the result should stand. If play cannot sensibly continue, both sides will get an average plus on the board. Don’t penalize the offenders unless it is a repeat offense.
I watched two experts try to deal with the following hand after opening one spade and hearing a one no-trump response. With ♠ K-Q-10-8-6-2, ♥ A-10-9, ♦ A-K-8-2, ♣ — one expert forced to game with a call of three diamonds, while one bid two diamonds. Each went down in five diamonds, facing a nine-count with a doubleton spade and four diamonds. Since four spades would have made, don’t you think a rebid of three spades makes sense here?
Milli Vanilli, Summit, N.J.
|
I admit it could work and I might do so today, but equally, facing short spades it might prove disastrous. With a good 6-4 one tends not to rebid the major unless it is the only choice. I have a sneaking admiration for a two diamond call – perhaps planning to rebid three spades if raised, intending to remove a three no-trump rebid to four hearts. There is no good answer, though, I admit.
I recently read a couple of columns which I felt were way above the average bridge player’s ability. I still enjoy reading bridge columns but I wonder if the target should be to educate or to improve the average bridge player.
Over the top, Sunny Isles, Fla.
Thank you for your comment. I tend to work on deals in my files or from the tournaments last year that have taken my fancy as a player or spectator. So I am somewhat limited by what I have to work with. My target is normally to start off easily on Monday, then work up to a tougher problem on Saturday. But sometimes I get carried away, I admit!
In a recent column you mentioned that at no-trump on the first trick you can agree to lead the king to suggest a strong holding, allowing partner to unblock the jack or queen. I thought the ACE requested the unblock, whereas the king would be from the top of a weaker sequence.
Cough it Up, Columbia, S.C.
There are two distinct schools of thought here. One can either agree to play ace and queen for attitude, king for count or unblock; or to play king for attitude and ace and queen for unblock. Both agreements are equally sound — all that matters is that you do one or the other (having no unblock card is unsound) and that you know what your partner does!
|
February 27th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
The first step towards amendment is the recognition of error.
Seneca
| S |
North |
| E-W |
♠ A K Q
♥ A 6 2
♦ A K 7 6 2
♣ Q 10 |
| West |
East |
♠ J 5 4
♥ Q J 10 8 5
♦ Q J
♣ 4 3 2 6 5 |
♠ —
♥ 9
♦ 10 9 8 3
♣ A K J 9 8 7 |
| South |
♠ 10 9 8 7 6 3 2
♥ K 7 4 3
♦ 5 4
♣ — |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| Pass |
Pass |
2 ♣ |
4 ♣ |
| 4 ♠ |
Pass |
5 ♠ |
Pass |
| 6 ♠ |
All pass |
|
|
♥Q
It would be easy to pass, looking at your absence of aces and kings, but the key to deciding whether to compete to the three-level is your fifth trump. When you bid three hearts you deny having a game try, since with that hand you would bid three clubs or three diamonds (or four hearts!). Such competitive deals are easier to judge if you play support doubles, so that partner’s raise promises four trump.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ J 5 4
♥ Q J 10 8 5
♦ Q J
♣ 4 3 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♦ |
Pass |
| 1 ♥ |
Dbl. |
2 ♥ |
2 ♠ |
| ? |
|
|
|
February 26th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
Danger, the spur of all great minds.
George Chapman
| W |
North |
| N-S |
♠ Q 3
♥ 6 4
♦ A K J 6 2
♣ A K J 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ 8 4
♥ K 7 2
♦ 10 8 5 4
♣ 10 9 5 3 |
♠ A 7 5
♥ A Q J 5 3
♦ 3
♣ Q 7 6 4 |
| South |
♠ K J 10 9 6 2
♥ 10 9 8
♦ Q 9 7
♣ 8 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
1 ♦ |
1 ♥ |
| 2 ♠ |
Pass |
4 ♠ |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♥2
It is tempting to raise clubs, but that takes you past three no-trump, which could easily be the best game. I would probe with three spades, using the fourth suit to encourage partner to bid three no-trump with a half stopper in spades or a three-card holding.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A 7 5
♥ A Q J 5 3
♦ 3
♣ Q 7 6 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♥ |
Pass |
2 ♦ |
Pass |
| 2 ♥ |
Pass |
3 ♣ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
February 25th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 5 Comments
Love truth, but pardon error.
Voltaire
| W |
North |
| E-W |
♠ Q 3
♥ K 9 7 3
♦ K Q 7 5
♣ A 10 6 |
| West |
East |
♠ 8 4 2
♥ 5 4 2
♦ 9 8 6 4
♣ 5 3 2 |
♠ K J 10 9 7
♥ 6
♦ J 10 3 2
♣ K Q 8 |
| South |
♠ A 6 5
♥ A Q J 10 8
♦ A
♣ J 9 7 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
1 ♦ |
1 ♠ |
| 2 ♥ |
Pass |
4 ♥ |
Pass |
| 6 ♥ |
All pass |
|
|
♠2
Your partner’s double is card-showing not penalty. You would normally only pass with two or more trump tricks, otherwise you would describe your hand further. Here you have an unbid four-card major, so you have a straightforward call of two hearts. Partner can bid on if he wants, but he knows you have both red suits and a minimum.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 3
♥ K 9 7 3
♦ K Q 7 5
♣ A 10 6 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♦ |
Pass |
1 ♠ |
2 ♣ |
| Pass |
Pass |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
February 24th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Wednesday, February 10th, 2016
The man who knows when not to act is wise. To my mind, bravery is forethought.
Euripides
| S |
North |
| E-W |
♠ A Q 2
♥ A K 9 7 4
♦ Q 9 5
♣ J 10 |
| West |
East |
♠ 6 5
♥ 6
♦ K J 10 4
♣ K Q 9 8 3 2 |
♠ 9 8 7
♥ J 10 8 3
♦ 8 3 2
♣ 7 6 5 |
| South |
♠ K J 10 4 3
♥ Q 5 2
♦ A 7 6
♣ A 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♠ |
2 ♣ |
2 ♥ |
Pass |
| 2 NT |
Pass |
3 ♣ |
Pass |
| 3 ♥ |
Pass |
3 ♠ |
Pass |
| 4 ♣ |
Pass |
5 ♠ |
Pass |
| 6 ♠ |
All pass |
|
|
♣K
Your partner’s redouble is SOS, suggesting a two- or three-suited hand with short hearts, after your LHO passed his partner’s take-out double for penalties. For the time being, you have absolutely no problem in bidding your three-card spade suit, as asked.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A Q 2
♥ A K 9 7 4
♦ Q 9 5
♣ J 10 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
1 ♣ |
| 1 ♥ |
Pass |
Pass |
Dbl. |
| Pass |
Pass |
Rdbl. |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
February 23rd, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 10 Comments
It is no matter what you teach (children) first, any more than what leg you shall put into your breeches first.
Samuel Johnson
| S |
North |
| Both |
♠ J 10 9 4 2
♥ A J
♦ K J 8 7 6
♣ 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ 8 7
♥ K Q 9 6 2
♦ 9 2
♣ K 10 9 8 |
♠ —
♥ 10 8 7 3
♦ Q 10 5 3
♣ A Q J 7 2 |
| South |
♠ A K Q 6 5 3
♥ 5 4
♦ A 4
♣ 6 5 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
4 ♣* |
Pass |
| 4 ♦ |
Pass |
4 ♥ |
Pass |
| 4 NT |
Pass |
5 ♦ |
Pass |
| 6 ♠ |
All pass |
|
|
*Spade support, short clubs
♥K
There is no way in standard bidding to show this precise two-suiter, since a cuebid shows the majors, a jump to two no-trump shows the red suits. But you must bid, and despite the fact that your diamonds are better than the spades, I would overcall one spade now. The space-consuming nature of the bid, and the fact that spades are the ranking suit, tips the balance for me.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ J 10 9 4 2
♥ A J
♦ K J 8 7 6
♣ 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
Pass |
1 ♣ |
| ? |
|
|
|
|
In three no-trump on a heart lead, South’s first plan is to develop the spades to make his game. If he can set up three spade winners, he will then need only one more trick; and he may then try to get that trick in clubs.
The first step is to win the first heart trick in dummy in order to play on spades. When West wins his ace, and returns a heart, declarer can see that two additional tricks will be needed, and the clubs don’t rate to do the trick. Hence South must try to develop two diamond tricks.
South should try to make West win the first diamond, to knock out the danger hand’s entry before the hearts are established. If East wins the first diamond, he will establish the hearts; and West will eventually get in with his top diamond to run the hearts.
South must tackle diamonds by leading a low diamond from dummy, since East should be given the chance to err by ducking. If East slips up, West will be forced to duck the first diamond or his hand will be dead, and South will make the contract without further difficulty. Having stolen a diamond trick, declarer can succeed by changing tack again, by playing on clubs. He emerges with two spades, a diamond, and three tricks in each of the other suits.
Had South led the first diamond from his own hand, West would let East win the first diamond. Now the defense would clear the hearts while West retains his entry.