|
My partner and I can’t agree about the handling of big hands. We just had two two-club auctions in the same session that went awry. I am looking for suggestions on the best approach to second-round responses. (We currently use a controlshowing response, where a call of two diamonds shows one or fewer kings, two hearts shows an ace or two kings, and two spades shows an ace or king or three kings.)
Great Scott, Tucson, Ariz.
After the two diamond response you can use the Kokish scheme of responses. All other calls are natural – except that opener’s direct jump to three of a major should be long diamonds and four cards in the bid major. I like responder being able to use a next-suit negative if opener bids two spades or three clubs at his second turn.
Holding ♠ A-J-2, ♥ K-6-4, ♦ Q-10-9-3-2, ♣ J-4 is there any merit to opening this hand in any seat at pairs? How important is the vulnerability issue here?
First Blow, Greenville, S.C.
Non-vulnerable at pairs I would consider opening this hand – but only because of the diamond spots. Vulnerable I think I’d pass – there are too many bad things that can happen. At least when you bid diamonds, partner knows you actually have the suit you have bid. If I did open, I would plan to raise a major-suit response rather than rebid one no-trump.
Yesterday, at our duplicate group, my hand was ♠ 7, ♥ A-9-7-6-5, ♦ K-J, ♣ A-K-J-10-8. I opened one club and heard my partner respond four spades. I passed, thinking her bid was a “close out” bid. Was I wrong, and what would you have done? My partner actually had a strong hand and slam was in the cards.
Don Draper, St Louis, Mo.
|
Your opening bid should definitely unequivocally and without exception be the major on a 5-5 two-suiter. Suit quality is truly not relevant. I know some people treat 5-5 in the black suits as a one club opener. Not me – unless I had an honorless spade suit and 150 honors in clubs, when I’d feel someone was sending me a message. Equally, your partner’s call was flat-out wrong; new suits are forcing. Don’t preempt your own side for no reason.
At duplicate with both sides vulnerable my LHO opened two diamonds, weak, passed round to me. I held ♠ K-Q-6-4, ♥ K-9, ♦ Q-5, ♣ Q-9-6-4-2 and chose to bid two notrump, but afterwards my partner told me that this shows a strong no-trump, and that I should have doubled.
Torn in Two, Milwaukee, Wis.
Bidding either black suit suggests a better holding, and doubling with only two hearts is very risky. Meanwhile, a call in notrump does suggest a better hand – though I admit it might work! I prefer to pass; this works if your best available result is to concede two diamonds, or if you can set two diamonds, but can’t make a game. These are two quite likely options.
At duplicate with only our side vulnerable I held ♠ 9-4, ♥ Q-9-7-4-3, ♦ J-7-5, ♣ Q-9-2. My LHO opened one club, my partner doubled, and my RHO bid one spade. I passed, and my LHO raised to three spades, ending the auction. Four hearts our way would have made; should I have bid at my first turn with this hand?
Chicken Little, Naples, Fla.
Bidding two hearts is probably right at your first turn. You have a five-card suit and a few values, and partner has promised at least heart tolerance. Don’t let your opponents push you around; your partner might hope for a little more for a two-heart call, but he will not expect the World’s Fair.
|
Plenty of players swear by leading middle from three or four small cards. They believe that the ambiguity on count is outweighed by the knowledge of the presence of an honor making third hand’s defense easier. I don’t agree – though second highest from four small at no-trump does make sense.
I believe third and lowest leads, coupled with occasionally leading high from small-card holdings is more helpful to partner overall. Note that it is not only third hand but also declarer who may benefit from the informative lead. Consider today’s deal, for example.
In one room in a team game the defenders led and continued clubs against four spades. Declarer ended up losing two hearts and two clubs. In the other room when a fourth-highest club two was led to the ace, South dropped the king. Why? Given that West was marked with three or four clubs, including the queen (he would have led a higher card without it), declarer’s best chance was to discard his heart losers on dummy’s diamonds. For that to work he needed not only additional entries to dummy but also for East to have the diamond ace.
East shifted to a low heart, and declarer played low from hand. West won the heart king and had only losing options left. He chose to return a heart, and declarer was home when he played low from dummy to force the queen.
But had West played the club queen and another club, declarer would have been in dummy. He could then have taken the ruffing finesse in diamonds against East while dummy still had a trump entry.