January 19th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 13 Comments
Better to be occasionally cheated than perpetually suspicious.
B. C. Forbes
| S |
North |
| E-W |
♠ K 8
♥ Q 8 2
♦ 7 4 2
♣ 7 5 4 3 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q 10 7 5 2
♥ 10 9 7
♦ 10 9 8
♣ Q 9 |
♠ A 6 4
♥ A 6 4 3
♦ K 6 5 3
♣ 10 8 |
| South |
♠ J 9 3
♥ K J 5
♦ A Q J
♣ A K J 6 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 2 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♠5
In context, your fivepoint hand has grown in stature. You didn’t act over one heart, but had the club two been the queen you would have come in at your first turn. Indeed, this hand is almost enough to bid four clubs now. I understand bidding only three clubs, but have a nagging feeling that partner must have a good hand here, and so you may well have decent play for game. I’ll go low, but it is close.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K 8
♥ Q 8 2
♦ 7 4 2
♣ 7 5 4 3 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| Pass |
1 ♦ |
Dbl. |
1 ♥ |
| Pass |
2 ♥ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
January 18th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
Thoughtlessness — I try not to think about it.
Jarod Kintz
| S |
North |
| Both |
♠ Q J 10 4
♥ A 5 3 2
♦ 8 3
♣ J 7 5 |
| West |
East |
♠ 9 8 3
♥ 9
♦ A 9 5 4 2
♣ K 10 3 2 |
♠ K 7 6 2
♥ 7 4
♦ Q J 10 7
♣ Q 9 6 |
| South |
♠ A 5
♥ K Q J 10 8 6
♦ K 6
♣ A 8 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♥ |
Pass |
2 ♥ |
Pass |
| 4 ♥ |
All pass |
|
|
♠9
Did you lead a heart – fourth highest from longest and strongest? BZZZ! Go to the back of the class. The lead will sometimes work. But a spade lead is less likely to cost a trick, and on a blind auction your objective is to lead a suit of five or more cards, or failing that to find the lead that combines safety with some aggression. The spade seven, second from weak length, is ideal here to suit that purpose.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ 9 7 6 4
♥ A Q 6 3
♦ J 6
♣ 10 9 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
1 NT |
| All pass |
|
|
|
January 17th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 9 Comments
|
In a recent column a journalist presented a deal where an endplay might have worked, but the column referred to a Chinese Finesse as an unpalatable alternative. What is your understanding of this?
Sherriff Sam, Houston, Texas
Leading an unsupported honor for a finesse is what the author meant – and it is not normally a good idea but a council of desperation. Normally one opponent tends to cover or the other player takes the trick in fourth chair. An endplay is a maneuver that does not require defensive error, so is generally preferable.
The problem I encountered today seems to plague me and I never manage to get it right. Holding ♠ J-7-4, ♥ Q-10-5, ♦ J-9-3, ♣ A-K-Q-3, I opened one club and my LHO overcalled one diamond. When my partner bid one spade I raised to two, thinking he would rate to have a five-card suit. Was that wrong?
Looking for Length, Providence, R.I.
If you play negative doubles promise both major suits, then a one spade call only guarantees four spades. That being the case, a one no-trump rebid is a more descriptive call at your second turn, despite your limited diamond stop, rather than raising spades with such a flat hand.
I ran into trouble on a competitive auction. My hand was ♠ J-9, ♥ Q-8-7-5-4-3 ♦ A-4, ♣ J-3-2. I heard my partner open one club and my RHO bid one spade. I thought my best chance to get into the auction was to bid two hearts now, but we got too high. Should I have passed?
Going Too Far, Wichita Falls, Texas
The best plan might be to make a negative double, intending to convert partner’s minimum response to two hearts. This suggests a six-card suit and scattered values – which is what you have. If the opponents raise spades you may have to sell out, but that is hardly the end of the world if partner can’t introduce hearts on his own account.
|
Playing in an unfamiliar partnership our bidding started one heart – two clubs – two spades. When my partner bid four no-trump, should I have treated it as regular Blackwood, keycard for spades, or quantitative?
Man Overboard, Muncie, Ind.
I’m torn here. The right way to set spades is to raise spades then use keycard, while a quantitative sequence is preceded by a two no-trump call here. So logically, a direct four no-trump should be neither of these. But I’d still expect partner to mean four no-trump as keycard for spades, since the last suit bid is normally trump here; not keycard for clubs, I think. (It is best to set declarer’s first suit as trump via Jacoby or an inverted minor, so that in that one specific case the immediate four no-trump call is reserved as asking for straight aces, not keycards.)
I know you often deal with variations of this issue but I’m confused when responder to an opening bid as to whether I should show my strength by jumping at my first, second or third turn, and often as to what is forcing and what is invitational. Are there any simple rules?
Big Ben, Memphis, Tenn.
In all auctions but one, responder’s new suits are forcing; opener can’t pass. So responder’s jump in a new suit at his first turn sends a specific message: a good suit and more than opening values. At responder’s second turn when facing a suit rebid or a new suit, new suits are forcing, with fourthsuit forcing to game. All raises, suit rebids and no-trump calls by responder tend to be non-forcing. Responder’s non-forcing new suit comes only after a no-trump rebid by partner, or a no-trump overcall by the opponents, when one doubles with a strong hand.
|
January 16th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
You can only be young once. But you can always be immature.
Dave Barry
| S |
North |
| E-W |
♠ 7 5 4
♥ K 7
♦ J 9 6 2
♣ A 7 4 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ J 10 6 3
♥ J 9 8 6 3
♦ A 7 5 3
♣ — |
♠ A K Q 9 8 2
♥ 10
♦ 8 4
♣ 8 6 5 2 |
| South |
♠ —
♥ A Q 5 4 2
♦ K Q 10
♣ K Q J 10 9 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♥ |
Pass |
1 NT |
2 ♠ |
| 3 ♣ |
4 ♣ |
5 ♣ |
5 ♠ |
| 6 ♣ |
Dbl. |
All pass |
|
♦A
I have often offered the advice that when they double you for penalties at low-levels, you should run. This auction is no exception. Any seven-card fit in a red suit rates to be better than the 6-0 club break with a trumpstack over you, to boot. Redouble for rescue and hope that partner can pick a red suit. (Mind you, if he picks spades you’d be delighted too!)
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ J 10 6 3
♥ J 9 8 6 3
♦ A 7 5 3
♣ — |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♠ |
2 ♣ |
Pass |
| Pass |
Dbl. |
Pass |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
January 15th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 9 Comments
The pessimist complains about the wind; the optimist expects it to change; the realist adjusts the sails.
William Arthur Ward
| E |
North |
| None |
♠ 6 3
♥ 6 5 4 3
♦ Q J 10 9 5
♣ A 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ 10 8 7 5
♥ Q 8 7
♦ 8 7
♣ 10 8 7 2 |
♠ Q J 9 2
♥ K 9 2
♦ K 6 4
♣ K J 3 |
| South |
♠ A K 4
♥ A J 10
♦ A 3 2
♣ Q 9 6 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
1 ♣ |
| Dbl. |
Pass |
1 ♦ |
Pass |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
3 ♥ |
Pass |
| 3 NT |
All pass |
|
|
♣2
Despite the disparity in your suits (and the auction in today’s problem above) I would advocate a response of one heart here. The logic is that partner will always deliver real heart support — at least three — and you are better placed to compete to two or even three diamonds. Such an auction would, incidentally, guarantee no more than four hearts and four-plus diamonds.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 6 3
♥ 6 5 4 3
♦ Q J 10 9 5
♣ A 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| Pass |
1 ♣ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
January 14th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 7 Comments
Men of genius do not excel in any profession because they labor at it, but they labor in it because they excel.
William Hazlitt
| W |
North |
| Both |
♠ A J 3
♥ 10 8 4
♦ A 9 8 4
♣ K 7 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ K 9
♥ 5
♦ J 7 6 5 3
♣ Q 9 6 5 4 |
♠ Q 10 6 4 2
♥ K 7 6
♦ Q 2
♣ A 10 8 |
| South |
♠ 8 7 5
♥ A Q J 9 3 2
♦ K 10
♣ J 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
1 ♣ |
1 ♠ |
| 2 ♥ |
Pass |
2 NT |
Pass |
| 4 ♥ |
All pass |
|
|
♠K
I think your partner’s double should be played as take-out for the two unbid suits, especially by a passed hand; you will never want to double for penalty here. This gives you the problem of whether to head for the ‘known’ heart fit or to bid two clubs, perhaps planning to compete over two diamonds to two hearts. I’ll try two clubs first, expecting one opponent or the other to bid two diamonds.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 10 6 4 2
♥ K 7 6
♦ Q 2
♣ A 10 8 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
Pass |
1 ♦ |
| 1 ♠ |
1 NT |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
January 13th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 8 Comments
We’ll get them in singles, Wilfred.
George Hirst
| E |
North |
| N-S |
♠ 5
♥ A K 10
♦ J 9 8 5 4
♣ 9 7 6 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ 4
♥ J 9 5 2
♦ Q 10 6 2
♣ Q J 10 4 |
♠ J 10 3 2
♥ Q 7 3
♦ K 7
♣ A K 8 5 |
| South |
♠ A K Q 9 8 7 6
♥ 8 6 4
♦ A 3
♣ 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
1 ♣ |
| 4 ♠ |
All pass |
|
|
♣Q
This would be easy if a simple raise in diamonds was 6-9 HCP. But it is not, it is inverted, showing a limit raise (plus) in diamonds, with a jump raise preemptive here. So our choice is to invent a heart suit, respond one no-trump with a singleton in a major, or pick between the underbid of three diamonds and the overbid of two diamonds. I go for the overbid in diamonds. That fifth trump is worth quite a lot.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 5
♥ A K 10
♦ J 9 8 5 4
♣ 9 7 6 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♦ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
January 12th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
A place for everything, and everything in its place.
Samuel Smiles
| S |
North |
| Both |
♠ A Q 6 5 3
♥ K 7
♦ A 4
♣ Q 9 5 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ J 9 8 4
♥ 5 2
♦ K Q J 8 7
♣ J 10 |
♠ K 10
♥ 4
♦ 10 6 3 2
♣ K 8 7 6 4 3 |
| South |
♠ 7 2
♥ A Q J 10 9 8 6 3
♦ 9 5
♣ A |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 4 ♣ * |
Pass |
4 ♦ |
Pass |
| 5 ♣ |
Pass |
5 ♠ |
Pass |
| 6 ♥ |
All pass |
|
|
*Sound four heart opener
♦K
Had partner raised directly to two spades, you would either have made a game-try of three clubs or even driven directly to game. But this is a very different auction: if partner has three trump he has less than a two-spade raise. If he has only two trump he has less than invitational values. Either way, it feels right to pass now.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A Q 6 5 3
♥ K 7
♦ A 4
♣ Q 9 5 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
1 NT |
Pass |
| 2 ♣ |
Pass |
2 ♠ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
January 11th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 7 Comments
Man is but a reed, the weakest in nature, but he is a thinking reed.
Blaise Pascal
| S |
North |
| Both |
♠ 8 7 4 3
♥ K J 9 3
♦ —
♣ A Q 9 8 6 |
| West |
East |
♠ K Q 2
♥ 10 6
♦ A K Q 9 8 5
♣ K J |
♠ 10 9 5
♥ 7 5 2
♦ J 10 6 2
♣ 10 7 5 |
| South |
♠ A J 6
♥ A Q 8 4
♦ 7 4 3
♣ 4 3 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♦ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| 2 ♦ |
3 ♦ |
Pass |
Pass |
| 3 ♥ |
Pass |
4 ♥ |
All pass |
♦K
Neither red suit lead appeals to me, so it is a question of which black suit is the least offensive. Leading from length is hardly a serious infraction, but still, the spade sequence gets my vote. We all remember how when we lead from this holding, the first four cards dummy puts down are king-10 fourth in our suit; we forget how often the lead is effective, or at least not costly.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ Q J 7
♥ A 3 2
♦ Q 10 7
♣ J 9 5 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
1 NT |
| All pass |
|
|
|
January 10th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 8 Comments
|
At rubber, with both sides vulnerable my LHO opened a strong no-trump, and my partner doubled, which we play as penalty. When my RHO ran to two clubs, should I have acted with ♠ Q-4, ♥ K-6-5-3, ♦ 10-9-5, ♣ Q-8-7-4?
Dumbbell, Jupiter Island, Fla.
You should double two clubs. Your hearts are not strong enough or long enough to bid, but the opponents must have less than half the deck without a great fit. If your partner has a long suit of his own, he will surely bid it over the double. If not, you will be happy to defend – and remember, two clubs doubled is not game!
Do you have any comment on the prevalence of bad ethics or cheating at the top level of the game? I ask because of the scandals currently blowing up involving several pairs of foreign experts.
Witch-finder General, Newport, R.I.
There are fewer than five top pairs suspected of collusion not already being investigated. Most of the expert community knows who the cheaters are, and the issue is whether the major federations will have the courage to go after them. Most of the guilty pairs were under suspicion for at least five years, but it took some brave individuals to publish and risk reprisals. I hope we won’t have to go that route again.
I held ♠ Q-J-9-4-2, ♥ 10-3, ♦ K-J-5, ♣ K-8-4. My partner opened one diamond and I responded one spade. When he rebid two diamonds, should I have rebid spades, tried for no-trumps, or raised diamonds?
Truth Seeker, Arlington, Texas
Simply raise to three diamonds. Do not repeat the spades on a five-card suit, since raising diamonds shows an invitational hand with diamond support – and with any luck partner will support your spades or bid three no-trumps with the appropriate hand. Whoever first said “Support with support” knew what he was talking about.
|
Do you have strong opinions as to what defense to a strong club most disturbs the opponents? I know you played a variety of artificial systems, but since you no longer do, can you let us in on the secret?
Behind the Curtain, Detroit, Mich.
Low level intervention doesn’t really help mess up your opponents’ responses. I like the idea of coming in with one heart and one spade on one- or twosuited hands when you can. And do preempt if the vulnerability will let you. Meanwhile, psyching against the strong club may score an occasional goal but will discourage partner on future occasions from bidding his hand.
At teams with nobody vulnerable my partner held ♠ A-9-6-5-3, ♥ J-10-4-2 ♦ K-5, ♣ Q-2. When I opened one diamond my LHO overcalled one spade, and my partner decided to pass and then passed out the re-opening double. We collected one undertrick for plus 100, but we could have made four hearts. What would you have done?
Underwhelmed, Venice Beach, Calif.
Your partner’s spade spots were a little weak to go for the throat. A negative double – intending to rebid two no-trump if no heart fit comes to life – looks plausible. But bidding no-trump directly is also reasonable, in which case one no-trump seems closer to the mark than bidding two no-trump. By the way, that action might have lost the heart fit altogether, so this is not an easy hand.
|
|
In today’s deal, the answer to the question of whether you trust East or West more may well affect your line of play on the deal.
Declaring three no-trump you receive the lead of the spade five. First (easy) question: which spade do you play from dummy?
The correct answer is that declarer must play low from dummy to ensure himself a spade stopper. Should he play the king, he may lose his stopper if East can win and return the suit to his partner’s Q-10. So you play low and East wins the spade ace, then returns the spade six. You are forced to win dummy’s king as West follows with the seven. What now?
Finding the club queen dropping in two rounds is necessary but not sufficient. Which red suit should you play at trick three? If spades are 4-4, go after hearts, if 5-3, take the diamond finesse, then use the club seven as the entry to repeat the finesse.
The answer is to play on diamonds, not hearts, because of the spade spots played at trick two. The key issue is that that the missing spade five and two suggest spades were originally 5-3 not 4-4. Had West followed with the spade two at trick two he would have given the game away, wouldn’t he? And note that had East managed to return his LOW spade from his remaining doubleton, you might well have gone wrong. It was far easier for West to lie than East.