March 23rd, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 12 Comments
When Wellington thrashed Bonaparte, as every child can tell, The House of Peers, throughout the war, did nothing in particular, And did it very well.
W. S. Gilbert
| N |
North |
| Both |
♠ 5 2
♥ A Q J 8 5
♦ Q J 7 4
♣ 6 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ A Q 10 6 4
♥ 10 7 4
♦ 10
♣ Q J 8 3 |
♠ J 3
♥ 9 6 3 2
♦ K 8 6 3 2
♣ 9 5 |
| South |
♠ K 9 8 7
♥ K
♦ A 9 5
♣ A K 10 7 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
Pass |
Pass |
| 1 ♣ |
1 ♠ |
2 ♥ |
Pass |
| 3 NT |
All pass |
|
|
♠6
Rather than bidding two diamonds, double for takeout. This allows your partner a wider choice of actions than insisting on one of your two suits. In general double tends to be the most flexible action in competitive auctions. Whenever you have decent high cards for the action you should consider doubling for take-out, assuming your hand has no clear cut direction.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 5 2
♥ A Q J 8 5
♦ Q J 7 4
♣ 6 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♣ |
Pass |
| 1 ♥ |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
March 22nd, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 5 Comments
Once you can see, touch and feel your objective, all you have to do is pull back and put all your strength behind it, and you’ll hit your target every time.
Bruce Jenner
| S |
North |
| Both |
♠ A 9 8 3
♥ K 8 6
♦ K 6 2
♣ 8 5 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ 5 4 2
♥ 9
♦ J 10 9 5 3
♣ A Q 10 9 |
♠ K 10 7 6
♥ 10 4 3
♦ Q 8 7 4
♣ J 6 |
| South |
♠ Q J
♥ A Q J 7 5 2
♦ A
♣ K 7 4 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♥ |
Pass |
2 ♥ |
Pass |
| 4 ♥ |
All pass |
|
|
♦J
If the opponents had not raised to two hearts you might well have jumped to two spades, but in competition it doesn’t seem to me that you have enough to take this balanced hand (including a heart king of dubious worth) beyond the two-level. You’d expect partner to advance with real extras; if he doesn’t have those extras, you surely won’t make game.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A 9 8 3
♥ K 8 6
♦ K 6 2
♣ 7 5 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♥ |
Dbl. |
2 ♥ |
| ? |
|
|
|
March 21st, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 7 Comments
You know, sometimes, when they say you’re ahead of your time, it’s just a polite way of saying you have a real bad sense of timing.
George McGovern
| S |
North |
| None |
♠ 10 9 2
♥ K Q 7
♦ J 6 3
♣ A Q J 10 |
| West |
East |
♠ 6
♥ J 10 9 8
♦ A 9 5 2
♣ K 9 6 2 |
♠ J 7 4 3
♥ A 6 3
♦ Q 10 8 7
♣ 7 4 |
| South |
♠ A K Q 8 5
♥ 5 4 2
♦ K 4
♣ 8 5 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
2 ♣ |
Pass |
| 2 ♠ |
Pass |
4 ♠ |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♥J
Clearly the lead of a black suit looks unattractive. Given that partner has virtually no high cards, are we better off leading from length or from a sequence? It is a close call but I’m going to go with leading from ace-fourth. This seems to work better when partner has four small cards, or the suit breaks evenly round the table.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ 7 5
♥ A 9 6 3
♦ Q J 2
♣ A Q 3 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♣ |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
2 NT |
| Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
|
March 20th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 8 Comments
|
I disagreed with my partner’s decision to open the following hand with a three-club preempt in second seat non-vulnerable ♠ J-9-4-3, ♥ 9-4, ♦ 10, ♣ K-Q-J-4-3-2. Where do you stand on the issues of side major-suits, and six-card preempts, and how important is the vulnerability?
Red Menace, Elkhart, Ind.
The seat you are in is important – one needs to be more disciplined in second seat. The side four-card major, weak though it is, might dissuade me from acting either in second seat or if vulnerable. In third chair where I need to keep the opponents guessing, I’d open three clubs, and I would open in first chair non-vulnerable, but not if my spades were even slightly better (say Q-10-43). Preempting specifically in clubs with a six-card suit is often acceptable, less common with other suits.
When holding both majors, I am often torn between a double, an overcall and a Michaels cuebid of a minor-suit opener. For example with ♠ K-J-10-3-2, ♥ A-Q-9-4, ♦ 10, ♣ Q-4-2 what should you do over a one diamond opener? If you overcall, when your LHO responds one no-trump and the auction is passed back to you, would you balance, and if so with what?
Mighty Quinn, Troy, N.Y.
If you overcall one spade, and then double at your next turn this suggests your approximate values and general shape (though you could be much better). There is something to be said for doubling initially, but you lose the 5-3 spade fit that way — and occasionally a 5-2 spade fit is best. Here your proposed overcall, followed by a double, covers all the bases. A Michaels cuebid should — errors and omissions excepting — always be 5-5 pattern.
Can you give me a definition on how to use all the calls in the bid boxes? I know what bids mean but I cannot find out what the Alert, Stop, X, and XX cards stand for, and who can give an alert if they don’t understand when these calls are used. I haven’t found the answers in books – though maybe this is because they predate the bidding boxes.
June Moon, Willoughby, Ohio
|
The Alert card signals to the opponents that partner’s call has an artificial or unusual meaning. Use this for every call with what you deem to be an unexpected meaning. Whenever a player is about to skip the bidding by making a jump bid, he makes the call and leaves out the stop card for about 10 seconds. The next player is then expected to wait about 10 seconds before making any call. The X/XX cards simply represent the calls of double and redouble.
I think I understand how four-suit transfers over one no-trump work. But what does Stayman followed by a minor mean (and does it mean the same after a two no-trump opening instead of a one no-trump opener)?
Desperately Seeking Stayman, Madison, Wis.
After a one no-trump opening, Stayman followed by three of a minor shows a good hand (at least the values for game) and five plus cards in the bid minor suit, typically with a side four-card major. After a two no-trump opening you would expect the same sort of handpattern for responder; but the fact you have gone past three no-trump implies you should have at least mild slam interest.
My partner and I were discussing whether our aim should be to bid our own cards as accurately as possible and not worry about the opponents, or whether we should try and be in their faces as much as possible, and accept the bad results that occasionally come with this style. Do you have any opinion where we should be aiming on the spectrum?
Block and Tackle, Park City, Utah
At all but the very highest level you should not aim to be focusing on playing disruptive bridge. Sure, play weak jumps and weak jump raises, and open 11-counts. But accurate bridge wins; I truly believe no one ever lost a match where they and their team mates played well.
|
March 19th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Saturday, March 5th, 2016
Confession is good for the soul only in the sense that a tweed coat is good for dandruff — it is a palliative rather than a remedy.
Peter de Vries
| W |
North |
| None |
♠ K 9 6
♥ K 9 8 7 6
♦ A 9
♣ 10 5 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ J 8 4
♥ A Q J 3
♦ 10 8 6 3 2
♣ K |
♠ 7 5 3 2
♥ 10 4
♦ K J
♣ 9 8 7 6 4 |
| South |
♠ A Q 10
♥ 5 2
♦ Q 7 5 4
♣ A Q J 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
Pass |
Pass |
| 1 ♣ |
Pass |
1 ♥ |
Pass |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♠4
Hands of this sort present an awkward problem. Should you go high or low, and what strain should you select? My opinion is that if you play the probabilities, partner is likely to hold 12-14 HCP and you have no eight-card fit. So this all argues for going low by bidding one notrump. Partner will move with shape and extras; if he passes, you rate to have no game.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K 9 6
♥ K 9 8 7 6
♦ A 9
♣ 10 5 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♣ |
Pass |
| 1 ♥ |
Pass |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
March 18th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 2 Comments
Prediction is very difficult, especially if it’s about the future.
Nils Bohr
| W |
North |
| N-S |
♠ J 9 8 7
♥ J 4 3
♦ K J 6 3
♣ A Q |
| West |
East |
♠ K 6 5 4 3
♥ 10
♦ A 8 4
♣ J 10 9 2 |
♠ 10
♥ K Q 9 6 2
♦ Q 9 7
♣ 7 6 5 3 |
| South |
♠ A Q 2
♥ A 8 7 5
♦ 10 5 2
♣ K 8 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
1 ♦ |
Pass |
| 1 ♥ |
1 ♠ |
Dbl.* |
Pass |
| 3 NT |
All pass |
|
|
*Three-card heart support
♣J
Your partner is not cuebidding for spades. He has a rock-crusher with clubs. Your hand is very suitable for higher things, so you must not pass now. I’m not sure if it best to cuebid five hearts, raise to six clubs, or whether you can risk five diamonds as an unequivocal cuebid for clubs. I’d choose between five hearts and six clubs based on my estimate of partner’s declarer play skill and his natural optimism.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K 6 5 4 3
♥ 10
♦ A 8 4
♣ J 10 4 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| Pass |
3 ♥ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| 4 ♠ |
Pass |
5 ♣ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
March 17th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
Chiefly the mold of a man’s fortune is in his own hands.
Francis Bacon
| E |
North |
| None |
♠ Q 9 7
♥ J 10 9 3
♦ A Q 6
♣ A 6 5 |
| West |
East |
♠ 2
♥ 6 5 4 2
♦ 10 8 4 2
♣ 10 9 8 7 |
♠ 8 6 5 4
♥ A K 7
♦ K J 7
♣ K 4 3 |
| South |
♠ A K J 10 3
♥ Q 8
♦ 9 5 3
♣ Q J 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
1 ♣ |
| 1 ♠ |
3 ♣ |
4 ♠ |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♣10
It would be sadistic to leave your partner in one no-trump doubled with a Yarborough. Some people play ‘system on’ after this double. If you do, so that a call of two clubs would be Stayman, you might consider using redouble here as a rescue to a minor. Partner bids two clubs, and you pass or correct to two diamonds. If you play natural rescues, I would advocate running to two clubs initially.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 2
♥ 6 5 4 2
♦ 10 8 4 2
♣ 10 9 8 7 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| Pass |
1 ♦ |
1 NT |
Dbl. |
| ? |
|
|
|
March 16th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 2 Comments
Common sense is calculation applied to life.
Henri Amiel
| W |
North |
| Both |
♠ K 9 6 4
♥ 8 5
♦ 5 4 2
♣ K 10 3 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ 8 5
♥ J 9 7 2
♦ A K Q J 6
♣ Q 4 |
♠ J 3
♥ K Q 10 4 3
♦ 9 3
♣ 9 8 7 6 |
| South |
♠ A Q 10 7 2
♥ A 6
♦ 10 8 7
♣ A J 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♦ |
Pass |
1 ♥ |
| 1 ♠ |
2 ♥ |
3 ♠ |
Pass |
| 4 ♠ |
All pass |
|
|
♦K
While you’d prefer to have six hearts to insist on playing the major facing a one notrump response, circumstances may alter cases. Here your solid heart holding suggests that facing almost any doubleton, hearts will play better than no-trump. Your hand may be virtually worthless at no-trump unless partner has the heart ace. And even facing a singleton honor, you’d like to play hearts, wouldn’t you?
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ J 3
♥ K Q 10 4 3
♦ 9 3
♣ 9 8 7 6 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
1 ♦ |
Pass |
| 1 ♥ |
Pass |
1 NT |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
March 15th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 9 Comments
Surely your gladness need not be the less for the thought that you will one day see a brighter dawn than this.
Lewis Carroll
| S |
North |
| None |
♠ J 8 7 4 2
♥ K J
♦ Q 7 3
♣ K 10 9 |
| West |
East |
♠ K 6
♥ 7 5 2
♦ J 10 9 8
♣ A 8 5 3 |
♠ A
♥ 9 8 6 4
♦ K 5 4 2
♣ 7 6 4 2 |
| South |
♠ Q 10 9 5 3
♥ A Q 10 3
♦ A 6
♣ Q J |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
3 ♠ |
Pass |
| 4 ♠ |
All pass |
|
|
♦J
Your hand offers virtually no prospects for slam. Should you bid three no-trump, transfer into spades, or use Stayman? Put my vote in the third category, since a 5-3 spade fit might be the only game that won’t make here. You have enough high cards to be relatively sure that three no-trump will be safe, but a 5-4 spade fit might still be best.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ J 8 7 4 2
♥ K J
♦ Q 7 3
♣ K 10 9 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
2 NT |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
March 14th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 3 Comments
Every advantage in the past is judged in the face of the final issue.
Demosthenes
| E |
North |
| N-S |
♠ 10 7 5
♥ K J 10
♦ K 8 6
♣ K J 6 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ 9 6 4 3 2
♥ A 6 4
♦ —
♣ Q 9 8 3 2 |
♠ 8
♥ 8
♦ A Q J 10 9 7 4 2
♣ A 10 5 |
| South |
♠ A K Q J
♥ Q 9 7 5 3 2
♦ 5 3
♣ 7 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
1 ♦ |
| 1 ♥ |
1 ♠ |
2 ♦ |
3 ♦ |
| 4 ♥ |
All pass |
|
|
♣2
You could not be overly criticized for a diamond lead, but I’m instinctively drawn to the spade lead. My partner appears to have spades sitting over dummy, and I could easily imagine that a spade lead might produce a trump promotion for my jack. Meanwhile, a diamond lead might allow declarer to get a ruff in dummy.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ 8 4
♥ K 10 7 4 2
♦ Q 6 4
♣ J 5 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♦ |
Dbl. |
| 1 ♥ |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
2 ♣ |
| All pass |
|
|
|
|
The Lords and Commons meet one another in an inter-parliamentary struggle in England every year. The House of Lords won this year’s match, and lead the series 22-19.
Some of the deals they play are set up with a subtle point in the play. Today’s deal first appeared in a large pairs competition and featured a challenge for declarer.
At many tables South opened one club in third seat and West overcalled one spade, a bid which should have influenced declarer’s line of play. As South, how do you play three no-trump after a low spade lead, the six, to East’s jack?
Many declarers quickly took the king, unblocked the heart king and tried to force an entry to table with a diamond. This line failed when East took the king and fired back a spade to leave declarer with five losers. After a one spade overcall it is clear that spades are going to break 5-2 (or even 6-1) and it cannot cost to let the spade jack hold the first trick. If declarer does that, then the game can no longer be defeated. A spade return is won by West’s 10, but that player has nothing he can do. If he abandons spades declarer can always make five hearts, two diamonds and two clubs for his contract. If he cashes the spade ace, declarer again comes to nine tricks by unblocking hearts then leading up to the diamond queen.
The hold-up is clear-cut if West has overcalled one spade; it is less clearly correct if there has been no opposition bidding.