January 23rd, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 3 Comments
Forget your opponents; always play against par.
Sam Snead
| S |
North |
| Both |
♠ Q J 10 9 5
♥ K 3 2
♦ A K 4
♣ 6 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ K 3 2
♥ 4
♦ Q J 10 8 2
♣ K 10 8 4 |
♠ 8 7 6 4
♥ J 10 6
♦ 7 6 5 3
♣ J 3 |
| South |
♠ A
♥ A Q 9 8 7 5
♦ 9
♣ A Q 9 7 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♥ |
Pass |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
| 2 ♣ |
Pass |
2 ♦ |
Pass |
| 3 ♣ |
Pass |
3 ♥ |
Pass |
| 4 ♣ |
Pass |
4 ♦ |
Pass |
| 5 NT |
Pass |
6 ♥ |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♦Q
Whether the opponents have intervened — with a bid or a double — or stayed silent, responder’s jumps at his second turn are invitational. Your singleton heart is not a bad holding given your fourth trump, and partner must have shape or he would have passed the double. So you are worth a jump to three clubs now.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K 3 2
♥ 4
♦ Q J 10 8 2
♣ K 10 8 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♣ |
Pass |
| 1 ♦ |
Dbl. |
1 ♥ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
January 22nd, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Friday, January 8th, 2016
Many of us are in are in our own prisons that aren’t made of iron bars.
Hill Harper
| N |
North |
| Both |
♠ Q 10 6 4
♥ K J 7
♦ K 9
♣ J 9 7 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ J 9 5 2
♥ —
♦ 6 4 3
♣ K Q 10 8 5 3 |
♠ K 7
♥ A Q 9 8 5 4 3
♦ 8
♣ A 6 4 |
| South |
♠ A 8 3
♥ 10 6 2
♦ A Q J 10 7 5 2
♣ — |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
Pass |
1 ♥ |
| 2 ♦ |
Dbl. |
Rdbl. |
4 ♥ |
| 5 ♦ |
Pass |
Pass |
Dbl. |
| All pass |
|
|
|
♣K
There are two quite reasonable routes here. You can redouble to show a hand interested in defending promising 9+HCP. Or you can ignore the opponents’ bidding and bid one spade, just as you would have done without intervention. Either route is fine – and I prefer either call to bidding one no-trump (though I might make that bid if my spades were weaker).
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 10 6 4
♥ K J 7
♦ K 9
♣ J 9 7 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
1 ♦ |
Dbl. |
| ? |
|
|
|
January 21st, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 8 Comments
Many people are angry when they make a mistake, but very few people have the sense to be sorry.
Katherine Patterson
| N |
North |
| N-S |
♠ K Q J 9 3
♥ K J 7 4
♦ Q 2
♣ 8 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ A 5 4
♥ 6 5 3
♦ 10 9 5
♣ A K Q 3 |
♠ 7 6 2
♥ 2
♦ K J 8 6 4 3
♣ 9 7 2 |
| South |
♠ 10 8
♥ A Q 10 9 8
♦ A 7
♣ J 10 6 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♠ |
Pass |
| 2 ♥ |
Pass |
4 ♥ |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♣K
When your partner is a passed hand, a new suit is non-forcing. Does that mean you should pass one spade here? I am not sure. Partner will always have five or more spades here, so arguably you are in your best strain at the most sensible level, with no chance that game can make your way. With the same hand and the club king in addition I would bid two clubs, but as it is, passing seems reasonable.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 10 8
♥ A Q 10 9 8
♦ A 7
♣ J 10 6 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
Pass |
1 ♦ |
| 1 ♥ |
Pass |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
January 20th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
In trying to be perfect, He perfected the art of anonymity, Became imperceptible And arrived nowhere from nowhere.
Dejan Stojanovic
| N |
North |
| E-W |
♠ 8 5 3
♥ K 10 7 3
♦ A 6 3 2
♣ 9 7 |
| West |
East |
♠ J 6 4
♥ 5 2
♦ 9 8
♣ K Q 10 6 5 2 |
♠ Q 10 9 7
♥ 9 8 4
♦ Q 10 7
♣ A 8 4 |
| South |
♠ A K 2
♥ A Q J 6
♦ K J 5 4
♣ J 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
Pass |
Pass |
| 2 NT |
Pass |
3 ♣ |
Pass |
| 3 ♥ |
Pass |
4 ♥ |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♣K
You have far too much to pass (indeed you have almost enough to drive to game). It would not be stupid to bid notrump now, on the basis that partner’s double strongly rates to deliver a spade stopper, and in any event the opponents don’t rate to have more than four spades to cash. But if you feel more cautious, a call of two diamonds shows a diamond stop and looks for a spade guard.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 8 5 3
♥ K 10 7 3
♦ A 9 6 3
♣ 9 7 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| Pass |
1 ♦ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| 1 ♥ |
1 ♠ |
2 ♣ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
January 19th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 13 Comments
Better to be occasionally cheated than perpetually suspicious.
B. C. Forbes
| S |
North |
| E-W |
♠ K 8
♥ Q 8 2
♦ 7 4 2
♣ 7 5 4 3 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q 10 7 5 2
♥ 10 9 7
♦ 10 9 8
♣ Q 9 |
♠ A 6 4
♥ A 6 4 3
♦ K 6 5 3
♣ 10 8 |
| South |
♠ J 9 3
♥ K J 5
♦ A Q J
♣ A K J 6 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 2 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♠5
In context, your fivepoint hand has grown in stature. You didn’t act over one heart, but had the club two been the queen you would have come in at your first turn. Indeed, this hand is almost enough to bid four clubs now. I understand bidding only three clubs, but have a nagging feeling that partner must have a good hand here, and so you may well have decent play for game. I’ll go low, but it is close.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K 8
♥ Q 8 2
♦ 7 4 2
♣ 7 5 4 3 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| Pass |
1 ♦ |
Dbl. |
1 ♥ |
| Pass |
2 ♥ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
January 18th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
Thoughtlessness — I try not to think about it.
Jarod Kintz
| S |
North |
| Both |
♠ Q J 10 4
♥ A 5 3 2
♦ 8 3
♣ J 7 5 |
| West |
East |
♠ 9 8 3
♥ 9
♦ A 9 5 4 2
♣ K 10 3 2 |
♠ K 7 6 2
♥ 7 4
♦ Q J 10 7
♣ Q 9 6 |
| South |
♠ A 5
♥ K Q J 10 8 6
♦ K 6
♣ A 8 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♥ |
Pass |
2 ♥ |
Pass |
| 4 ♥ |
All pass |
|
|
♠9
Did you lead a heart – fourth highest from longest and strongest? BZZZ! Go to the back of the class. The lead will sometimes work. But a spade lead is less likely to cost a trick, and on a blind auction your objective is to lead a suit of five or more cards, or failing that to find the lead that combines safety with some aggression. The spade seven, second from weak length, is ideal here to suit that purpose.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ 9 7 6 4
♥ A Q 6 3
♦ J 6
♣ 10 9 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
1 NT |
| All pass |
|
|
|
January 17th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 9 Comments
|
In a recent column a journalist presented a deal where an endplay might have worked, but the column referred to a Chinese Finesse as an unpalatable alternative. What is your understanding of this?
Sherriff Sam, Houston, Texas
Leading an unsupported honor for a finesse is what the author meant – and it is not normally a good idea but a council of desperation. Normally one opponent tends to cover or the other player takes the trick in fourth chair. An endplay is a maneuver that does not require defensive error, so is generally preferable.
The problem I encountered today seems to plague me and I never manage to get it right. Holding ♠ J-7-4, ♥ Q-10-5, ♦ J-9-3, ♣ A-K-Q-3, I opened one club and my LHO overcalled one diamond. When my partner bid one spade I raised to two, thinking he would rate to have a five-card suit. Was that wrong?
Looking for Length, Providence, R.I.
If you play negative doubles promise both major suits, then a one spade call only guarantees four spades. That being the case, a one no-trump rebid is a more descriptive call at your second turn, despite your limited diamond stop, rather than raising spades with such a flat hand.
I ran into trouble on a competitive auction. My hand was ♠ J-9, ♥ Q-8-7-5-4-3 ♦ A-4, ♣ J-3-2. I heard my partner open one club and my RHO bid one spade. I thought my best chance to get into the auction was to bid two hearts now, but we got too high. Should I have passed?
Going Too Far, Wichita Falls, Texas
The best plan might be to make a negative double, intending to convert partner’s minimum response to two hearts. This suggests a six-card suit and scattered values – which is what you have. If the opponents raise spades you may have to sell out, but that is hardly the end of the world if partner can’t introduce hearts on his own account.
|
Playing in an unfamiliar partnership our bidding started one heart – two clubs – two spades. When my partner bid four no-trump, should I have treated it as regular Blackwood, keycard for spades, or quantitative?
Man Overboard, Muncie, Ind.
I’m torn here. The right way to set spades is to raise spades then use keycard, while a quantitative sequence is preceded by a two no-trump call here. So logically, a direct four no-trump should be neither of these. But I’d still expect partner to mean four no-trump as keycard for spades, since the last suit bid is normally trump here; not keycard for clubs, I think. (It is best to set declarer’s first suit as trump via Jacoby or an inverted minor, so that in that one specific case the immediate four no-trump call is reserved as asking for straight aces, not keycards.)
I know you often deal with variations of this issue but I’m confused when responder to an opening bid as to whether I should show my strength by jumping at my first, second or third turn, and often as to what is forcing and what is invitational. Are there any simple rules?
Big Ben, Memphis, Tenn.
In all auctions but one, responder’s new suits are forcing; opener can’t pass. So responder’s jump in a new suit at his first turn sends a specific message: a good suit and more than opening values. At responder’s second turn when facing a suit rebid or a new suit, new suits are forcing, with fourthsuit forcing to game. All raises, suit rebids and no-trump calls by responder tend to be non-forcing. Responder’s non-forcing new suit comes only after a no-trump rebid by partner, or a no-trump overcall by the opponents, when one doubles with a strong hand.
|
January 16th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
You can only be young once. But you can always be immature.
Dave Barry
| S |
North |
| E-W |
♠ 7 5 4
♥ K 7
♦ J 9 6 2
♣ A 7 4 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ J 10 6 3
♥ J 9 8 6 3
♦ A 7 5 3
♣ — |
♠ A K Q 9 8 2
♥ 10
♦ 8 4
♣ 8 6 5 2 |
| South |
♠ —
♥ A Q 5 4 2
♦ K Q 10
♣ K Q J 10 9 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♥ |
Pass |
1 NT |
2 ♠ |
| 3 ♣ |
4 ♣ |
5 ♣ |
5 ♠ |
| 6 ♣ |
Dbl. |
All pass |
|
♦A
I have often offered the advice that when they double you for penalties at low-levels, you should run. This auction is no exception. Any seven-card fit in a red suit rates to be better than the 6-0 club break with a trumpstack over you, to boot. Redouble for rescue and hope that partner can pick a red suit. (Mind you, if he picks spades you’d be delighted too!)
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ J 10 6 3
♥ J 9 8 6 3
♦ A 7 5 3
♣ — |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♠ |
2 ♣ |
Pass |
| Pass |
Dbl. |
Pass |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
January 15th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 9 Comments
The pessimist complains about the wind; the optimist expects it to change; the realist adjusts the sails.
William Arthur Ward
| E |
North |
| None |
♠ 6 3
♥ 6 5 4 3
♦ Q J 10 9 5
♣ A 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ 10 8 7 5
♥ Q 8 7
♦ 8 7
♣ 10 8 7 2 |
♠ Q J 9 2
♥ K 9 2
♦ K 6 4
♣ K J 3 |
| South |
♠ A K 4
♥ A J 10
♦ A 3 2
♣ Q 9 6 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
1 ♣ |
| Dbl. |
Pass |
1 ♦ |
Pass |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
3 ♥ |
Pass |
| 3 NT |
All pass |
|
|
♣2
Despite the disparity in your suits (and the auction in today’s problem above) I would advocate a response of one heart here. The logic is that partner will always deliver real heart support — at least three — and you are better placed to compete to two or even three diamonds. Such an auction would, incidentally, guarantee no more than four hearts and four-plus diamonds.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 6 3
♥ 6 5 4 3
♦ Q J 10 9 5
♣ A 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| Pass |
1 ♣ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
January 14th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 7 Comments
Men of genius do not excel in any profession because they labor at it, but they labor in it because they excel.
William Hazlitt
| W |
North |
| Both |
♠ A J 3
♥ 10 8 4
♦ A 9 8 4
♣ K 7 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ K 9
♥ 5
♦ J 7 6 5 3
♣ Q 9 6 5 4 |
♠ Q 10 6 4 2
♥ K 7 6
♦ Q 2
♣ A 10 8 |
| South |
♠ 8 7 5
♥ A Q J 9 3 2
♦ K 10
♣ J 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
1 ♣ |
1 ♠ |
| 2 ♥ |
Pass |
2 NT |
Pass |
| 4 ♥ |
All pass |
|
|
♠K
I think your partner’s double should be played as take-out for the two unbid suits, especially by a passed hand; you will never want to double for penalty here. This gives you the problem of whether to head for the ‘known’ heart fit or to bid two clubs, perhaps planning to compete over two diamonds to two hearts. I’ll try two clubs first, expecting one opponent or the other to bid two diamonds.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 10 6 4 2
♥ K 7 6
♦ Q 2
♣ A 10 8 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
Pass |
1 ♦ |
| 1 ♠ |
1 NT |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
|
Given that the solution to today’s deal feels a touch artificial, you may not be entirely surprised to discover that it derives from a very old par contest problem. In those deals you rarely run into a favorable break or a winning finesse, so be warned that if your intended solution might fail, it probably will!
When West leads the diamond king, you can do better than taking the club finesse immediately, planning to ruff a club in dummy. That is a perfectly reasonable line; after losing the club finesse you would regain the lead and would draw two rounds of trump with the ace and king then hope to ruff out the clubs. But the lie of the cards is very hostile to that approach, and today you would go down like a stone.
Instead, the solution is to focus on dummy’s delicious spade spots. At trick two your shortage of entries to dummy means that you must cash the second diamond winner, unblocking your spade ace. Next lead out the spade queen and discard a club from hand. It will not do West any good to duck this (there are lies of the cards where if West had four spades it might help to duck the first two spades then win the third and lead a fourth to kill a discard, but not today). As it is, he wins the spade king at once but cannot stop you coming to 12 tricks via three spades, six hearts and three minor suit winners.