January 13th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 8 Comments
We’ll get them in singles, Wilfred.
George Hirst
| E |
North |
| N-S |
♠ 5
♥ A K 10
♦ J 9 8 5 4
♣ 9 7 6 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ 4
♥ J 9 5 2
♦ Q 10 6 2
♣ Q J 10 4 |
♠ J 10 3 2
♥ Q 7 3
♦ K 7
♣ A K 8 5 |
| South |
♠ A K Q 9 8 7 6
♥ 8 6 4
♦ A 3
♣ 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
1 ♣ |
| 4 ♠ |
All pass |
|
|
♣Q
This would be easy if a simple raise in diamonds was 6-9 HCP. But it is not, it is inverted, showing a limit raise (plus) in diamonds, with a jump raise preemptive here. So our choice is to invent a heart suit, respond one no-trump with a singleton in a major, or pick between the underbid of three diamonds and the overbid of two diamonds. I go for the overbid in diamonds. That fifth trump is worth quite a lot.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 5
♥ A K 10
♦ J 9 8 5 4
♣ 9 7 6 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♦ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
January 12th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
A place for everything, and everything in its place.
Samuel Smiles
| S |
North |
| Both |
♠ A Q 6 5 3
♥ K 7
♦ A 4
♣ Q 9 5 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ J 9 8 4
♥ 5 2
♦ K Q J 8 7
♣ J 10 |
♠ K 10
♥ 4
♦ 10 6 3 2
♣ K 8 7 6 4 3 |
| South |
♠ 7 2
♥ A Q J 10 9 8 6 3
♦ 9 5
♣ A |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 4 ♣ * |
Pass |
4 ♦ |
Pass |
| 5 ♣ |
Pass |
5 ♠ |
Pass |
| 6 ♥ |
All pass |
|
|
*Sound four heart opener
♦K
Had partner raised directly to two spades, you would either have made a game-try of three clubs or even driven directly to game. But this is a very different auction: if partner has three trump he has less than a two-spade raise. If he has only two trump he has less than invitational values. Either way, it feels right to pass now.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A Q 6 5 3
♥ K 7
♦ A 4
♣ Q 9 5 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
1 NT |
Pass |
| 2 ♣ |
Pass |
2 ♠ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
January 11th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 7 Comments
Man is but a reed, the weakest in nature, but he is a thinking reed.
Blaise Pascal
| S |
North |
| Both |
♠ 8 7 4 3
♥ K J 9 3
♦ —
♣ A Q 9 8 6 |
| West |
East |
♠ K Q 2
♥ 10 6
♦ A K Q 9 8 5
♣ K J |
♠ 10 9 5
♥ 7 5 2
♦ J 10 6 2
♣ 10 7 5 |
| South |
♠ A J 6
♥ A Q 8 4
♦ 7 4 3
♣ 4 3 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♦ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| 2 ♦ |
3 ♦ |
Pass |
Pass |
| 3 ♥ |
Pass |
4 ♥ |
All pass |
♦K
Neither red suit lead appeals to me, so it is a question of which black suit is the least offensive. Leading from length is hardly a serious infraction, but still, the spade sequence gets my vote. We all remember how when we lead from this holding, the first four cards dummy puts down are king-10 fourth in our suit; we forget how often the lead is effective, or at least not costly.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ Q J 7
♥ A 3 2
♦ Q 10 7
♣ J 9 5 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
1 NT |
| All pass |
|
|
|
January 10th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 8 Comments
|
At rubber, with both sides vulnerable my LHO opened a strong no-trump, and my partner doubled, which we play as penalty. When my RHO ran to two clubs, should I have acted with ♠ Q-4, ♥ K-6-5-3, ♦ 10-9-5, ♣ Q-8-7-4?
Dumbbell, Jupiter Island, Fla.
You should double two clubs. Your hearts are not strong enough or long enough to bid, but the opponents must have less than half the deck without a great fit. If your partner has a long suit of his own, he will surely bid it over the double. If not, you will be happy to defend – and remember, two clubs doubled is not game!
Do you have any comment on the prevalence of bad ethics or cheating at the top level of the game? I ask because of the scandals currently blowing up involving several pairs of foreign experts.
Witch-finder General, Newport, R.I.
There are fewer than five top pairs suspected of collusion not already being investigated. Most of the expert community knows who the cheaters are, and the issue is whether the major federations will have the courage to go after them. Most of the guilty pairs were under suspicion for at least five years, but it took some brave individuals to publish and risk reprisals. I hope we won’t have to go that route again.
I held ♠ Q-J-9-4-2, ♥ 10-3, ♦ K-J-5, ♣ K-8-4. My partner opened one diamond and I responded one spade. When he rebid two diamonds, should I have rebid spades, tried for no-trumps, or raised diamonds?
Truth Seeker, Arlington, Texas
Simply raise to three diamonds. Do not repeat the spades on a five-card suit, since raising diamonds shows an invitational hand with diamond support – and with any luck partner will support your spades or bid three no-trumps with the appropriate hand. Whoever first said “Support with support” knew what he was talking about.
|
Do you have strong opinions as to what defense to a strong club most disturbs the opponents? I know you played a variety of artificial systems, but since you no longer do, can you let us in on the secret?
Behind the Curtain, Detroit, Mich.
Low level intervention doesn’t really help mess up your opponents’ responses. I like the idea of coming in with one heart and one spade on one- or twosuited hands when you can. And do preempt if the vulnerability will let you. Meanwhile, psyching against the strong club may score an occasional goal but will discourage partner on future occasions from bidding his hand.
At teams with nobody vulnerable my partner held ♠ A-9-6-5-3, ♥ J-10-4-2 ♦ K-5, ♣ Q-2. When I opened one diamond my LHO overcalled one spade, and my partner decided to pass and then passed out the re-opening double. We collected one undertrick for plus 100, but we could have made four hearts. What would you have done?
Underwhelmed, Venice Beach, Calif.
Your partner’s spade spots were a little weak to go for the throat. A negative double – intending to rebid two no-trump if no heart fit comes to life – looks plausible. But bidding no-trump directly is also reasonable, in which case one no-trump seems closer to the mark than bidding two no-trump. By the way, that action might have lost the heart fit altogether, so this is not an easy hand.
|
January 9th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
When you reach for the stars you may not quite get one, but you won’t come up with a handful of mud either.
Leo Burnett
| S |
North |
| Both |
♠ K 5
♥ J 9 2
♦ K Q J 10 7
♣ J 10 9 |
| West |
East |
♠ 8 6
♥ K 10 6
♦ 9 6 5 3
♣ Q 8 4 2 |
♠ 10 4 2
♥ Q 8 5
♦ A 8 4 2
♣ A 6 3 |
| South |
♠ A Q J 9 7 3
♥ A 7 4 3
♦ —
♣ K 7 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
2 ♦ |
Pass |
| 2 ♥ |
Pass |
2 ♠ |
Pass |
| 3 ♣ |
Pass |
3 NT |
Pass |
| 4 ♠ |
All pass |
|
|
♣2
You might not feel you are worth a bid of four hearts, but I encourage you to make that call. The opponents may or may not make three spades, but your spade king is likely to be pulling its weight, and you have enough fit and high cards for four hearts to be in the picture. Don’t be pushed around by your opponents here.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K 5
♥ J 9 2
♦ K Q J 10 7
♣ J 10 9 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
1 ♥ |
1 ♠ |
| 2 ♦ |
3 ♠ |
Pass |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
January 8th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
No man is a hero to his valet.
Madame de Cornuel
| W |
North |
| None |
♠ 9 8 7
♥ A K 8 4
♦ 8 2
♣ 10 9 8 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ 10 5 3
♥ Q J 9
♦ A K Q 10
♣ K 7 5 |
♠ A 2
♥ 10 7 6 3
♦ 9 6 5 3
♣ 6 3 2 |
| South |
♠ K Q J 6 4
♥ 5 2
♦ J 7 4
♣ A Q J |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♦ |
Pass |
2 ♦ |
| 2 ♠ |
3 ♦ |
3 ♠ |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♦K
The first question is whether to respond to the two notrump opening at all. The second is whether to bid Stayman. I would certainly act, but whether to check for the fit and give away information to the opponents (as well as maybe give the chance for a lead-directing double of three clubs) is a very close one. I go for the raise to three no-trump. Were my ace in a long suit, I’d use Stayman.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A 2
♥ 10 7 6 3
♦ 9 6 5 3
♣ 6 3 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
2 NT |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
January 7th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 8 Comments
Madam, I have been looking for a person who disliked gravy all my life; let us swear eternal friendship.
Sydney Smith
| S |
North |
| Both |
♠ Q 9 5 3
♥ A K 5
♦ 7 6 3
♣ K J 7 |
| West |
East |
♠ A 2
♥ Q J 10 9 8 6
♦ Q J 2
♣ 10 8 |
♠ 8 6
♥ 2
♦ 10 9 8 5 4
♣ Q 9 6 4 2 |
| South |
♠ K J 10 7 4
♥ 7 4 3
♦ A K
♣ A 5 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♠ |
2 ♥ |
3 ♥ |
Pass |
| 4 ♠ |
All pass |
|
|
♥Q
This hand poses a challenge. A call of one spade tends to promise real clubs (with this pattern one tends to rebid one no-trump and rely on finding spades later if partner has a good hand). But with no diamond stopper and great hearts might you consider raising hearts instead? All three calls are plausible; but the balanced nature of the hand wins out. One no-trump for me.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 9 5 3
♥ A K 5
♦ 7 6 3
♣ K J 7 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♣ |
Pass |
1 ♥ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
January 6th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
It is imperative, for our own survival, that we avoid one another, and what more successful means of avoidance are there than words?
Janet Frame
| W |
North |
| E-W |
♠ K 10 4
♥ Q J 5 3
♦ 8 7 3
♣ 8 7 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ 6 2
♥ A 9 2
♦ A Q J 9
♣ Q J 10 2 |
♠ Q 7
♥ 8 7 6 4
♦ 6 5 4 2
♣ K 9 3 |
| South |
♠ A J 9 8 5 3
♥ K 10
♦ K 10
♣ A 6 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♦ |
Pass |
1 ♥ |
| 1 ♠ |
Dbl.* |
Pass |
2 ♦ |
| 2 ♠ |
Dbl. |
Rdbl. |
3 ♦ |
| Pass |
Pass |
3 ♠ |
All pass |
*Promises three-card support for hearts
♣Q
This hand is certainly too good to pass. The question is whether you are worth more than a simple raise to two spades. I’d say no: with such sterile distribution, maybe a little caution is appropriate. Give yourself a doubleton diamond, and I might think about a jump to three spades.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K 10 4
♥ Q J 5 3
♦ 8 7 3
♣ 8 7 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♣ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| 1 ♥ |
Pass |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
January 5th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 8 Comments
Silence more musical than any song.
Christina Rossetti
| S |
North |
| E-W |
♠ 8 5 4 3
♥ 6
♦ A 8 7 5 4
♣ K 3 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ A K 9 7 2
♥ A
♦ J 3 2
♣ J 9 8 5 |
♠ Q 10 6
♥ 10 5 3 2
♦ K 10 9
♣ 10 6 4 |
| South |
♠ J
♥ K Q J 9 8 7 4
♦ Q 6
♣ A Q 7 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♥ |
1 ♠ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| 4 ♥ |
All pass |
|
|
♠K
Never be afraid to introduce a major, no matter how weak it is, into an action of this sort. After all partner has promised both majors (admittedly only three-plus cards) when he doubled one club. There will be time to introduce diamonds later if necessary. But note that a double of one heart is penalty not responsive.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 8 5 4 3
♥ 6
♦ A 8 7 5 4
♣ K 3 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| Pass |
1 ♣ |
Dbl. |
1 ♥ |
| ? |
|
|
|
January 4th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 5 Comments
Stick a fork in him. He’s done.
Leo Durocher
| S |
North |
| Both |
♠ K Q 10 8
♥ 9 7 6 2
♦ A 5
♣ K 10 8 |
| West |
East |
♠ 9 6 5 4
♥ A K 8 4
♦ 10 7
♣ Q 7 4 |
♠ 7 2
♥ 10 5 3
♦ K 9 8 3 2
♣ J 6 3 |
| South |
♠ A J 3
♥ Q J
♦ Q J 6 4
♣ A 9 5 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♣ |
Pass |
1 ♥ |
Pass |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♠6
I do not see any reason to get aggressive here. Dummy rates to put down some length in a minor but that suit may or may not breaking for him. The most passive lead is a small trump – that can hardly do anything too terrible to partner’s holding and may, for example, make a ruff in dummy more awkward.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 9 3
♥ A 7 2
♦ J 9 6 4
♣ 10 7 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
Pass |
1 ♥ |
| Pass |
1 NT |
Pass |
2 ♥ |
| Pass |
3 ♥ |
Pass |
4 ♥ |
| All pass |
|
|
|
|
Today’s deal comes from a recent knock-out teams event played at the 10-day Brighton Summer Congress, one of England’s premier events.
South, Steve Raine, played in four spades, and West led the club queen, the suit his partner had opened. When dummy went down it all appeared to be plain sailing to declarer. So long as trumps broke 3-2 there would be one loser in each of the side suits.
On ruffing the club continuation, two top spades were cashed, declarer getting the bad news of the 4-1 trump break. At first glance it appears that the contract must now fail, but declarer turned his attention to a trump coup – where he could try to single in his small trump separately. Accordingly Raine continued with the diamond ace, then another diamond to the eight and king. East helpfully returned a club, which South ruffed, and he next played a heart to the ace and ruffed his last club.
At this point declarer played a heart to the king, then a diamond from the dummy. This left East with no winning option: if he discarded, South would ruff with the spade nine for his 10th trick. And if he ruffed in, declarer would pitch his losing heart and take the rest.
Incidentally, declarer had been assisted in his task by inaccurate defense. East could have beaten declarer by returning a heart when on lead, as now declarer cannot shorten his trump sufficiently. If declarer has the heart jack, there is no defense to the game.