Aces on Bridge — Daily Columns

The Aces on Bridge: Sunday, October 11th, 2015

I was dealt ♠ J-2, A-J-10-6-4, Q-7-6, ♣ K-7-4, and responded one heart to one diamond. When my partner jumped to two spades, I was afraid to give preference to diamonds in case he passed. Should I have bid two or three notrump, used fourth suit, or even rebid hearts?

Multiple Choice, Hamilton, Ontario

Remember, two spades sets up a game force, so you should not worry about playing partscore here. Rebidding hearts should promise a better suit, and to bid no-trump you would like a more solid club stopper than this. Giving preference to three diamonds is economical and descriptive. More importantly it leaves room for partner to describe his hand, and tell you why he set up a game force.

What is the current expert position on signaling suit-preference on defense? Where does suit-preference rank in terms of signaling count or attitude? And what should I be thinking about when deciding which signal to give?

Self-referential, Wheaton, Ill.

On opening lead I signal attitude unless I am sure my partner should know who has any missing honors in the suit led. Thereafter, the default signal becomes count. It is only when the need to shift is obvious that suit preference kicks in. By contrast, when a suit is played for the second time, I will often give suit preference, unless I believe partner really needs to know count.

I picked up a hand at rubber bridge yesterday, which left me stuck for a bid. I held ♠ 3, A-9-6, A-7-6-4, ♣ A-K-7-4-2. I responded two clubs (game forcing) to one spade, and when my partner bid three spades I had no idea how to advance. What would you suggest?

Menace to Society, Naples, Fla.

Since partner’s three spade call promises good spades, I would need to make at least one slam-try. My choice would be a jump to five spades to focus on partner’s spades. I need him to bid slam with a one-loser suit. I think he should appreciate that I have at most a small doubleton in spades for this auction, but all the sidecontrols.

How much do I need to rebid one no-trump when I open one of a suit and hear my LHO overcall at the one level, passed back to me? I tried this on a bad 15-count that I had elected to open one no-trump, and was told in no uncertain terms that this was theoretically unacceptable.

Two Stools, Casper, Wyo.

Whether the language used was unparliamentary or not, the idea of a rebid in no-trump facing a silent partner is that it should be 18-19, i.e. more not less than a strong no-trump. With a minimum balanced hand facing a presumably weak partner, let the opponents play in peace and quiet – though you can reopen with a double when short in their suit, of course.

If my partner bids one diamond, do I have to have five hearts to say one heart or am I able to do it with only four? Does one have discretion to bypass a weak major?

Nearly a Novice, Lorain, Ohio

You ask an important question — never be afraid to ask even if you think you should know the answer. One level major-suit responses only guarantee four cards. They may have more of course. Opener raises with four (and sometimes with three and an unbalanced hand). One needs the response to show four-plus cards or one can never find the 4-4 fits with confidence. Bypassing a major is rare, but possible after your RHO doubles a minor.


For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog. Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2015. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Saturday, October 10th, 2015

He who does not fear death cares naught for threats.

Pierre Corneille


S North
None ♠ K J 10 9
 K 10 7 3
 A 3
♣ A Q 3
West East
♠ A 7 2
 A Q J 5 4
 J 4
♣ 9 6 4
♠ Q 8 6 4 3
 8 2
 7
♣ K 10 8 7 5
South
♠ 5
 9 6
 K Q 10 9 8 6 5 2
♣ J 2
South West North East
4 Pass 5 All pass
       

A

On this deal from the Mixed Teams at Sanya both Souths were faced with a choice of whether to go high or low at their first turn to speak. The fact that you have no sure defensive trick argues for preempting to the limit. Both Souths duly preempted to four diamonds and were raised to game. What should one lead from the West hand?

In one room West selected the club four. I’m not convinced about the technical merits of this approach — but it worked a treat. Declarer had no choice but to finesse, and East won with the king and returned the spade four, West’s major-suit aces producing a rapid one down.

In the second room, where Mike Cappelletti Jr. was declarer, West went for the heart ace. I admit it: this is what I would have done too. She then switched to an honest club nine, and declarer played her to be an upright citizen, and not to have the club king. He put up dummy’s ace and then treated the defenders to eight rounds of diamonds.

When the last of them hit the table, declarer had a club menace in hand and a threat card in each major. West had to keep two hearts and the spade ace, thus discarded her last club. With the communications cut between the two defenders, declarer could come down to two spades and one heart in dummy, and lead a spade toward the king for his 11th trick. That was a well-played +400 and 10 IMPs.


You may think you have a pile of garbage, but I would nonetheless raise to three clubs now. There are two reasons for this: you may keep opponents out of their heart fit, and facing a hand with shape you might make a lot of tricks. (Incidentally, I wouldn’t sit for three no-trump here if my partner makes that call next – this hand looks like it should be played in clubs.)

BID WITH THE ACES

♠ Q 8 6 4 3
 8 2
 7
♣ K 10 8 7 5
South West North East
    1 Pass
1 ♠ Pass 2 ♣ Pass
?      

For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog. Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2015. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Friday, October 9th, 2015

As far as it’s ideal that you get helped by people, it doesn’t mean they are compelled to make your dreams come true without your efforts.

Israelmore Ayivor


S North
Both ♠ A Q J 6 2
 Q 9 6 4
 A K
♣ A 4
West East
♠ K 10 9 7
 8 5
 10 9 6
♣ J 9 5 2
♠ 5 4 3
 J 10 7 3
 J 8 7 4 3
♣ Q
South
♠ 8
 A K 2
 Q 5 2
♣ K 10 8 7 6 3
South West North East
1 ♣ Pass 1 ♠ Pass
2 ♣ Pass 2 Pass
3 ♣ Pass 4 ♣ Pass
3 Pass 4 NT Pass
5 Pass 6 ♣ All pass
       

10

Benedicte Cronier and Sylvie Willard of France are generally ranked as one of the world’s top women pairs – and they are also charming partners and teammates.

In the most recent world championships where duplicated boards were in use Willard outplayed most of the declarers (male and female) in her seat.

She declared six clubs on a top diamond lead. She won in dummy and tried the club ace, believing her RHO’s play of the club queen. So she played the spade ace and ruffed a spade, crossed to the diamond king and ruffed another spade, (West missing her chance by following low at every turn). Then declarer tried two top hearts, and when East also fell from grace by failing to drop one of the heart jack or 10 under the king, Willard decided the suit was not breaking.

She ruffed her diamond winner to dummy, then judged perfectly to ruff a spade to hand and exit in hearts. This forced West to ruff and lead away from her trump trick. Plus 1370 meant Willard was the only declarer to make her slam in the McConnell Cup.

As indicated above, West could surely have made Willard’s life far harder by dropping the spade king on the third round of spades. Now declarer would surely have played for hearts to break, allowing West to ruff in while she could still exit with the fourth spade, defeating the slam.

Just for the record: at least two tables in the open event played partscore here with the NorthSouth cards, picking up a very undeserving swing.


Is this last call natural or a cuebid supporting hearts? Opinions vary – and it is far more important to reach agreement with your partner than with me. I vote for cuebid, but you don’t have to commit yourself – bid four diamonds as a repeat cuebid and see what happens next.

BID WITH THE ACES

♠ A Q J 6 2
 Q 9 6 4
 A K
♣ A 4
South West North East
1 ♠ Pass 1 NT Pass
3 Pass 4 ♣ Pass
?      

For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog. Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2015. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Thursday, October 8th, 2015

Lost time is never found again.

Benjamin Franklin


W North
N-S ♠ K 5 3
 10 4 3
 A 8 7
♣ A K 10 7
West East
♠ 10 4
 A K Q J 9 6 5
 4 2
♣ Q 4
♠ 9 8 7 6
 8 7
 Q J 9 6
♣ J 9 8
South
♠ A Q J 2
 2
 K 10 5 3
♣ 6 5 3 2
South West North East
  4 Dbl. Pass
4 ♠ All pass    

K

In the round of 32 knock-out phase of the mixed teams at Sanya the easiest winners were Moss, who ended up winning by 100 IMPs — despite conceding an 1100 penalty on the very first deal, just to make it more interesting. This was the second deal.

Where Sylvia Moss and Michael Seamon were East-West, a quiet one heart opening by West saw their opponents collect plus 150 in three clubs. Moss’ teammate Kerri Sanborn found herself in four spades after her opponents as West bid much more aggressively. Curiously, though nobody defended four hearts doubled here, quite a few pairs were caught in three hearts when North guessed well to pass out South’s balancing take-out double.

So how should Sanborn have played four spades on repeated heart leads? It is best to ruff, cross to a top club in dummy and ruff another heart. East can do no better than pitch a diamond, so you unblock your trump honors from hand, cross to a second club in dummy, and draw a third round of trump, leaving East with the master spade and winning club. When you play a third club, East is on lead. If he cashes his master trump, you pitch diamonds from both hands, and claim the balance.

He does much better to shift to a diamond, but whether he leads a high one or low one, your diamond 10 is enough to ensure you three diamond tricks as the cards lie.

You end up scoring two ruffs and three trumps, and five tricks in the minors, one way or another.


Since two diamonds by your partner would set up a force, three diamonds should specifically be short diamonds (singleton or void). Obviously three no-trump is no longer in the picture as a final contract; with three-card heart support, raise hearts now, and take it from there. You have a superb hand for slam if partner tries to encourage you to cooperate.

BID WITH THE ACES

♠ K 5 3
 10 4 3
 A 8 7
♣ A K 10 7
South West North East
1 ♣ 1 1 Pass
1 NT Pass 3 Pass
?      

For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog. Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2015. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Wednesday, October 7th, 2015

Courage and grace are a formidable mixture. The only place to see it is in the bullring.

Marlene Dietrich


N North
Both ♠ J 9 7 3
 A J 5 3
 A Q 9 3
♣ J
West East
♠ A Q 6 2
 Q 10 6
 K 10 7 2
♣ 6 2
♠ 4
 K 7 4
 8 6 5
♣ Q 10 9 8 7 3
South
♠ K 10 8 5
 9 8 2
 J 4
♣ A K 5 4
South West North East
    1 3 ♣
Dbl. Pass 4 ♣ Pass
4 ♠ All pass    

♣6

The mixed teams event at the world championships in Sanya saw the Willenken team of the USA defeat Binkie, a combined Anglo/Australian squad. This deal turned out to be critical.

In one room the Willenken team had reached four spades by North and been treated to a friendly low club lead. Declarer had come home with 10 tricks by running the lead to his hand. He played on trumps, then, after a helpful heart switch by West, he had set up hearts for one loser, eventually taking the diamond finesse for his 10th winner.

In the other room Jane Dawson for Binkie declared the contract as South on the auction shown. West’s club opening lead did not cost a trick. Dawson won with the ace in hand and led to the diamond queen. When that held, she cashed the ace of diamonds, ruffed a diamond and cashed the club king, discarding a heart from dummy.

Declarer then ruffed a club, as West discarded a heart, and ruffed another diamond in hand before playing her fourth club. She ruffed in dummy as West discarded another heart.

In the five-card ending if declarer had now cashed the heart ace and exited with a heart, West would have been forced to ruff her partner’s winner and been trump-endplayed. But declarer misread the position by playing a low heart from dummy, and went down anyway.

Note, though, that West had missed her chance by not ruffing low on the previous club. Had she kept two hearts and three trumps in the ending, declarer would have been helpless.


Opinions differ as to whether one should get involved with a shape-suitable minimum. Bidding is not without risk – you may tip declarer off to how to tackle the red suits, for example, as well as running the risk of going for a number. That said, too dangerous is no excuse. I would double on the grounds that it is safer to bid now than later.

BID WITH THE ACES

♠ K 10 8 5
 9 8 2
 J 4
♣ A K 5 4
South West North East
  1 Pass 1
?      

For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog. Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2015. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Tuesday, October 6th, 2015

I don’t see it as my role to save or rescue anybody any more than regular people feel the need to rescue each other from sleeping and dreaming.

Jed McKenna


East-West North
North ♠ 8 7 5
 A 10 8 6 4
 K J 7
♣ A 6
West East
♠ A Q 10 9 4 3
 7 2
 3
♣ Q J 4 3
♠ J 6 2
 K J 9 3
 Q 9 6
♣ 10 7 5
South
♠ K
 Q 5
 A 10 8 5 4 2
♣ K 9 8 2
South West North East
    1 Pass
2 2 ♠ 3 Pass
3 ♠ Pass 4 ♣ Pass
4 Pass 5 All pass

♣Q

Since the eastern Indian city of Chennai is currently hosting the Bermuda Bowl, we shall be considering deals from last October’s world championships in Sanya, China. Today’s exhibit from the Rosenblum semifinal between Monaco and Diamond nearly rescued the event for the latter.

In one room Helness and Helgemo for Monaco had stopped in three diamonds, for a comfortable 10 tricks, after Helness, North, had opened the bidding. Curiously, South had bid two no-trump in the face of West’s spade bid. Had North raised to three no-trump, we would have had a chance to see if West would have led the spade ace. Of course declarer would still have had to negotiate the diamonds after any other lead.

In the other room Brink and Drijver for the Diamond team pursued the sensible policy of ensuring that with an opening bid facing an opening bid, they would at least get to game.

West led the club queen against five diamonds. Declarer won in dummy and played a spade to the king and ace. West returned the spade queen, and declarer ruffed, cashed the club king, then ruffed a club with the diamond jack. He next ruffed a spade, ruffed a club with the diamond king, played a diamond to the 10, cashed the diamond ace, and exited with a diamond.

East had to win his diamond queen, and had no choice now but to lead into declarer’s heart tenace, and Drijver could not guess wrong. That was 11 tricks and a worthy gain of 7 IMPs for Diamond.


In almost every situation where a double is made under the trumps, you are trying to show cards, not play for penalty. I would describe this double as take-out, so I would not expect your partner to play for blood without sure trump tricks. If your partner supports hearts you will raise, and you will correct three clubs to three diamonds. If he bids three diamonds, that will be trickier. Sufficient unto the day…

BID WITH THE ACES

♠ 8 7 5
 A 10 8 6 4
 K J 7
♣ A 6
South West North East
    1 Pass
1 2 ♠ Pass Pass
?      

For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog. Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2015. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Monday, October 5th, 2015

Civilization is like a thin layer of ice upon a deep ocean of chaos and darkness.

Werner Herzog


S North
None ♠ A J 10
 3
 K Q 9 8
♣ A J 8 5 3
West East
♠ Q 4 3 2
 K 10 6 5 4
 A 7 4
♣ 2
♠ K 9 5
 J 9 8
 J 3
♣ Q 9 7 6 4
South
♠ 8 7 6
 A Q 7 2
 10 6 5 2
♣ K 10
South West North East
Pass 1 Dbl. 2
Pass Pass Dbl. Pass
3 NT All pass    

5

Today’s deal is from the women’s world championships in Sanya, China last October. It is from the match between the Moss team of the USA, against Singapore. Disa Eythorsdottir, originally from Iceland, but now living in Huntsville, Alabama, was declarer.

After her partner Lynn Deas had doubled twice, Disa assumed correctly that she had sufficient extra values for three no-trump to have decent play. So she leaped directly to the contract she thought she could make.

Disa won the lead of the heart five in hand with the queen, and led a diamond to the king, a club to the king and a diamond to the queen. With two diamond tricks in the bag she now required just four club tricks, so she thoughtfully led a low club from the board to make full use of her intermediates. Had East ducked, declarer would have reverted to diamonds, but East accurately rose with the club queen, and the 5-1 split meant one of South’s contemplated nine tricks had vanished.

East now reverted to hearts. Disa ducked, pitching a club from dummy, (necessary, since if she had discarded a diamond, West would have cashed the diamond ace and exited in spades). Disa won the next heart, discarding a diamond, and now led a spade to the 10.

When East won her spade king, she had to lead a club; so Disa cashed both clubs and forced West to let go both her hearts. Now a diamond exit endplayed West to lead spades at trick 12, and declarer finessed for her ninth trick.


The opponents are clearly in a limited auction, and will not have any values to spare. (If they did, they would be playing in game.) The diamond lead is most passive, while a spade lead is most likely both to set up tricks for your side, but it may well cost a trick if it is wrong. I’m going to lead diamonds, on the grounds that I may be able to shift to spades later, if need be.

LEAD WITH THE ACES

♠ J 10 6
 Q 8 7 5
 8 6 4
♣ Q J 7
South West North East
  1 ♣ Pass 1
Pass 1 ♠ Pass 2 NT
All pass      

For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog. Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2015. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Sunday, October 4th, 2015

Please help me to understand a little bit more about inverted minor raises. To start with, are you in favor of them, and should they apply either in competition, or by a passed hand? If you do play them, should the jump raise be weak, or simply less than an invitation – and how many trump should it promise?

Helping Hans, Walnut Creek, Calif.

I like inverted raises; they help constructive bidding by letting good hands start low. They apply by a passed hand; but they are not used in competition. I play a jump raise is weak when non-vulnerable, but invitational to three no-trump facing an 18-19 count if we are vulnerable. A jump raise of a minor will always deliver five, an inverted raise of diamonds may deliver only four diamonds.

Do you always lead from length on a blind auction (such as one notrump – three no-trump) or do you prefer to lead from a sequence in a shorter holding? And what about leading from a major as opposed to a minor?

Opening Fire, Pueblo, Colo.

With values, I tend to lead from a long suit, of five or more cards, be it a major or a minor, unless the action clearly makes that a bad idea. But if I have a broken four-carder and a sensible three-card holding, I may go passive against a blind auction. Additionally, I am not a fan of leading from ace-fourth into a strong hand; but leading from other honor holdings do not bother me as much.

As dealer I passed, holding ♠ 5, K-10-7-6-2, A-Q-10-8, ♣ 10-6-4, and heard my partner open one diamond and the next hand overcall one spade. Would you double, or bid hearts, or raise diamonds? I chose to bid two hearts. Now I heard two spades to my left and two no-trump from my partner. When the next hand bid three spades, what would you do now?

Friar John, Carmel, Calif.

For what it is worth, my bid over one spade would be three hearts, since I play fit-jumps by a passed hand. I cannot simply hold hearts or I’d have preempted at my first turn, or would bid two hearts or double now. Over three spades I’d bid four diamonds. I can’t keep quiet about that support any longer.

I encountered an unusual problem when my partner opened one heart in third seat and the next hand overcalled one no-trump. I held ♠ 2, Q-J-9-6-2, K-Q-6-3, ♣ J-7-4. I jumped trustingly to four hearts, doubled and down one when partner had only a four-card suit and 11 points. But doubling one no-trump would not have worked either. What should I have done?

Too Trusting, Union City, Tenn.

Two hearts would be a gross underbid and three hearts would be preemptive here, so I suggest you add a small systemic wrinkle to your partnership agreements. Use a call of two no-trump in this sequence to be a limit raise in hearts instead of natural or takeout for the minors. This way, you let partner get involved intelligently.

I held ♠ A-J-8-6-4-2, 6-2, A-9-8, ♣ Q-4, and heard my partner open one club and rebid two clubs after my one spade response. I jumped to three spades, raised to four, and could not bring it home facing the singleton spade king. My partner suggested that I should bid only two spades. I felt that my hand justified an invitational jump bid. What would you have bid?

Steamroller, Columbia, S.C.

With the spade 10 in addition to your other assets, three spades would be unimpeachable. As it is, you have a marginal opener – so your choice would be the mainstream action, along with comments from an expert panel that this is ‘the least lie’. For the record, if an initial jump to two spades was non-forcing and weak, then without the spade jack you might content yourself with a simple rebid of two spades.


For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog. Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2015. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Saturday, October 3rd, 2015

Invention, strictly speaking, is little more than a new combination of those images which have been previously gathered and deposited in the memory; nothing can come from nothing.

Sir Joshua Reynolds


E North
Both ♠ A
 J 7 5 4 2
 K 6 2
♣ 10 9 5 3
West East
♠ Q J 9 4
 A 10 6
 Q 9 4 3
♣ 8 4
♠ K 10 7 5
 K Q 9 8 3
 A 10 7
♣ 7
South
♠ 8 6 3 2
 —
 J 8 5
♣ A K Q J 6 2
South West North East
      1
2 ♣ Dbl. 2 2 ♠
3 ♣ 3 5 ♣ All pass

♠Q

One of my regular correspondents is Tim Bourke, winner with Justin Corfield of “The Art of Declarer Play”, bridge book of the year in 2014. Tim never ceases to impress me with his fertile imagination. Here West leads the spade queen against five clubs; plan the play.

While the diamond ace looks likely to be offside, a simple line would be to play on diamonds, hoping for the diamond queen to be with East; but you can do better. Declarer wins the spade lead in dummy, ruffs a heart, then takes the next six tricks by crossruffing the majors, ruffing the remaining hearts high in hand as West pitches a diamond on the last.

By this point, West, whose bidding has suggested close to invitational values, needs the diamond queen to justify his actions.

Accordingly, in the five-card ending declarer crosses to dummy in trumps and leads the last heart from dummy, throwing the diamond five as East wins his king. If West discards a diamond, East’s diamond ace takes trick 11 but the diamond king and club ace represent the last two tricks. If West ruffs his partner’s winner and leads a diamond, then playing low is obvious. This forces the ace, and declarer claims the rest.

If West had turned up with better hearts earlier, so that East appeared to have both top diamonds, then instead of ruffing out the hearts, declarer would need to switch tack by leading a diamond from dummy and playing to set up a diamond.


In auctions of this sort your partner’s bid of the opponent’s suit on the second round should be natural. I admit that the action is somewhat unexpected, but your partner could be 5-5 in spades and diamonds, with your RHO holding five or six clubs, and four hearts. While you do have fitting honors you don’t have quite enough to raise to three diamonds, so pass.

BID WITH THE ACES

♠ A
 J 7 5 4 2
 K 6 2
♣ 10 9 5 3
South West North East
  1 1 ♠ Dbl.
Pass 1 NT 2 Pass
?      

For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog. Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2015. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Friday, October 2nd, 2015

Tomorrow is not a promise. Tomorrow is a second chance.

J. R. Rim


S North
Both ♠ A Q
 J 9 7 3
 J 7 4
♣ A 7 5 2
West East
♠ K 3 2
 Q 6 2
 10 9 8
♣ K 10 6 3
♠ 5
 K 10 8 5 4
 6 5 3 2
♣ J 9 8
South
♠ J 10 9 8 7 6 4
 A
 A K Q
♣ Q 4
South West North East
1 ♠ Pass 2 ♣ Pass
2 ♠ Pass 3 ♠ Pass
4 NT Pass 5 ♠ Pass
6 ♠ All pass    

10

In today’s deal when North set up a game-forcing auction and raised to three spades, South got slightly carried away. With no losers in the red suits, South checked on keycards and ended the auction in six spades when he discovered they were missing only one.

West led the diamond 10, and with dummy having so little in the way of extras, declarer could predict an almost certain club loser. So it seemed that the chances boiled down to the favorable trump division. His hopes were raised when a finesse of the queen won, but dashed when East showed out on the second round. There was no squeeze and South lost a club as well as a trump.

Declarer should have reasoned that, if he had to lose a trump trick, it might be possible that when an opponent eventually won with the king he would be forced to lead away from the club king. At trick two South should cash the heart ace; then he finesses in trumps, ruffs a heart and crosses to the spade ace to reveal the sure trump loser. Next he ruffs another heart and cashes his remaining top diamonds before putting West in with his trump winner. Now, with no safe exit cards left, West is reduced to leading a club. The chances of success for this line, once West turns up with three trumps, depend on West having precisely three hearts and no more than three diamonds. Additionally, if the heart king-queen fell early, dummy would offer a discard for the club loser.


This is a complex hand, and at the moment you have no idea where you are going. Start by doubling one heart, which is penalty not responsive – with any moderate hand and four or more spades you would just bid the suit, even if you had longer clubs. The question of how to develop the hand at your next turn may depend on where the opponents run.

BID WITH THE ACES

♠ A Q
 J 9 7 3
 J 7 4
♣ A 7 5 2
South West North East
  1 Dbl. 1
?      

For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog. Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2015. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].