December 20th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 20 Comments
|
My colleagues and advisers never seem to agree about how and when the Gerber convention can be used. Most agree that if clubs have been bid, the Blackwood convention is appropriate. Others maintain that it is still correct to bid four clubs.
Iceberg, Kelowna, British Columbia
Here’s when to use Gerber in suit auctions: never. I suggest to you that a call of four clubs is always a cuebid, rather than Gerber, unless it is a jump after a call of no-trump. I know my readers will never buy this, and that it is a losing battle to suggest it. So let’s at least agree that when it isn’t a jump, a call of four clubs is never Gerber. And it is never, ever, Gerber when clubs are trump.
Recently as dummy I saw my partner playing a three heart contract in which the opponents revoked in mid-hand. If the renege had not been caught, declarer would have been down one. He now receives two tricks from opponents. The question is, do these tricks give him game or just the contract and an overtrick?
Cereal Killer, Pinehurst, N.C.
The contract is three hearts – regardless of any revoke(s). The penalty can’t exceed the number of tricks taken by the offenders on or after the offence. If the revoker (personally, not his partner) won the revoke trick, the penalty is two tricks. If the revoker didn’t win that trick, the penalty is one trick, UNLESS the revoker subsequently won a trick with a card he could have played legally on the revoke trick. Also, a director can restore equity if the penalty does not suffice.
We have a pair at our club who play a weak no-trump. Do you consider that it is best to play a double of Stayman or of their transfer call by an unpassed hand as relating to the suit they have just bid, or to show points?
Al Dente, Cincinnati, Ohio
|
By a passed hand, all doubles are lead directing. A double of Stayman or an artificial transfer call by an unpassed hand might sensibly be played as strong, unlinked to clubs. But a double of a natural response should just be take-out.
Holding: ♠ Q-2, ♥ A-Q-7-5-2, ♦ A-J-9-3, ♣ 3-2 I opened one heart and after a two club response I bid two diamonds. Now my partner bid two spades and the next hand doubled. What should I have bid without the double – and what with it?
Wheaties, Tacoma, Wash.
Without the double, you would have to bid two no-trump – the doubleton queen is almost as good as a stopper, and if partner has an honor, no-trump is probably better played your way up. After the double you can pass, suggesting this pattern, or a hand with three spades but no wish to bid no-trump.
Please advise your bid with this hand. Holding ♠ Q-7-2, ♥ 2, ♦ J, ♣ A-K-Q-10-8-4-3-2 I gambled to open two clubs, and rebid three clubs. My partner used Blackwood and drove us to six no-trump, which made on a finesse. Was I out of line to do so much?
Fortunate Son, Myrtle Beach, S.C.
Your idea was not a bad one, but the problem is that when partner has scattered values he will assume you own more quick tricks than you have. Here is a good rule; with a long strong suit open two clubs if all one-level responses from partner would leave you without a bid. Even so, open at the one-level unless you have at least one and a half quick tricks outside your long solid suit. Change a red card to an ace here, and you are closer to the mark.
|
December 19th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 2 Comments
Nothing defines humans better than their willingness to do irrational things in the pursuit of phenomenally unlikely payoffs.
Douglas Adams
| W |
North |
| E-W |
♠ A 7 6 4
♥ 9 8 4
♦ K 4
♣ K Q J 10 |
| West |
East |
♠ K 8
♥ K Q J 10 7
♦ Q J 10 8
♣ 5 4 |
♠ J 10 2
♥ 3
♦ 9 7 6 5 2
♣ 8 7 6 2 |
| South |
♠ Q 9 5 3
♥ A 6 5 2
♦ A 3
♣ A 9 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♥ |
Pass |
Pass |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
2 ♣ |
Pass |
| 2 ♠ |
Pass |
4 ♠ |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♥K
Fasten your seat belts; this may be a bumpy ride. I’m not a dedicated follower of Dick Walsh but in response to one club I will bypass a four- or even-five-card diamond suit to bid a four-card major, with a one-bid hand short of sound invitational values. So I would rebid one no-trump now as opener, expecting partner either not to have a major or to be able to bid it over one no-trump.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 9 5 3
♥ A 6 5 2
♦ A 3
♣ A 9 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♣ |
Pass |
1 ♦ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
December 18th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 8 Comments
The first blow is half the battle.
Oliver Goldsmith
| N |
North |
| E-W |
♠ K 9 8 2
♥ K 7
♦ Q 6
♣ A J 8 7 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q J 4
♥ Q 10 3
♦ J 10 9
♣ 9 5 3 2 |
♠ 10
♥ J 9 8 6 5 2
♦ K 7 5 4
♣ Q 6 |
| South |
♠ A 7 6 5 3
♥ A 4
♦ A 8 3 2
♣ K 10 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♣ |
Pass |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
2 ♠ |
Pass |
| 3 ♦ |
Pass |
4 ♣ |
Pass |
| 6 ♠ |
All pass |
|
|
♦J
This is an invitational sequence, and while you have no real extras in high cards, your fifth club and reasonable spotcards suggest you give partner a try at making game. There is no reason why the clubs won’t prove a useful source of tricks; if they don’t, even two no-trump might be a struggle.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K 9 8 2
♥ K 7
♦ Q 6
♣ A J 8 7 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♣ |
Pass |
1 ♥ |
Pass |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
2 NT |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
December 17th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
A man may build himself a throne of bayonets, but he cannot sit on it.
Dean Inge
| N |
North |
| N-S |
♠ Q J 8 7
♥ 3 2
♦ K Q 9 7 5 2
♣ 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ A 5 2
♥ K Q J 10 9 8
♦ 3
♣ K 9 8 |
♠ 10 6
♥ 4
♦ J 10 8 6 4
♣ Q J 10 7 2 |
| South |
♠ K 9 4 3
♥ A 7 6 5
♦ A
♣ A 6 5 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
Pass |
Pass |
| 1 ♣ |
2 ♥ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| 3 ♠ |
Pass |
4 ♠ |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♥K
In this position double by you would be take-out. Should you make that call? I think not. With such a skewed hand, it feels right to bid diamonds now. You may decide to act again, but for the time being, the main feature of your hand is your diamond suit. I agree with the decision to pass initially, by the way. You rate to lose the spades for good if you preempt here.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ Q J 8 7
♥ 3 2
♦ K Q 9 7 5 2
♣ 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| Pass |
1 ♣ |
1 ♥ |
2 ♣ |
| ? |
|
|
|
December 16th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 8 Comments
If ever I was foxed, it was now.
Samuel Pepys
| N |
North |
| Both |
♠ 5
♥ A Q 3
♦ 8 5 4 3
♣ K Q J 10 5 |
| West |
East |
♠ K 4 2
♥ J 10 2
♦ 10 9 6
♣ 8 6 3 2 |
♠ A
♥ K 9 8 6 5 4
♦ K Q J
♣ 9 7 4 |
| South |
♠ Q J 10 9 8 7 6 3
♥ 7
♦ A 7 2
♣ A |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♣ |
1 ♥ |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
1 NT |
Pass |
| 4 ♠ |
All pass |
|
|
♥J
You have a choice of rebid here; you can either bid one no-trump, or you can repeat your clubs. Normally I’d veer toward rebidding one no-trump with this pattern, but on this occasion your good club spots coupled with the singleton spade suggests the twoclub rebid. Switch the club queen into the diamond suit, and the decision is much closer.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 5
♥ A Q 3
♦ 8 5 4 3
♣ K Q J 10 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♣ |
Pass |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
December 15th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 10 Comments
Not merely a chip off the old ‘block’ but the old block itself.
Edmund Burke
| N |
North |
| N-S |
♠ 9 5
♥ A J 9
♦ Q J 7
♣ K 7 5 4 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ —
♥ K 10 8 5 2
♦ A K 5 2
♣ A 10 9 2 |
♠ Q 7 3 2
♥ 7 4 3
♦ 9 8 4
♣ Q J 6 |
| South |
♠ A K J 10 8 6 4
♥ Q 6
♦ 10 6 3
♣ 8 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♣ |
Pass |
| 1 ♥* |
Dbl. |
Pass |
Pass |
| 4 ♠ |
Dbl. |
All pass |
|
*Spades
♦K
Facing a forcing notrump your choice is to bid two clubs then perhaps introduce the diamonds, or bid the minors in the other order. I marginally prefer bidding diamonds first. That keeps the auction more under control. Note that partner almost certainly has a respectable hand; the opponents haven’t bid spades with 10 spades between them.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ —
♥ K 10 8 5 2
♦ A K 5 2
♣ A 10 9 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 5 ♥ |
Pass |
1 NT |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
December 14th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 10 Comments
Success breeds complacency. Complacency breeds failure. Only the paranoid survive.
Andy Grove
| W |
North |
| N-S |
♠ J 9 7 5
♥ Q 3
♦ A 9 5 2
♣ A K 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ —
♥ J 10 5 4
♦ Q 10 8 4
♣ Q J 9 8 7 |
♠ Q 10 8 3
♥ A 9 8 7 2
♦ 7
♣ 10 6 2 |
| South |
♠ A K 6 4 2
♥ K 6
♦ K J 6 3
♣ 5 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
1 ♦ |
Pass |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
2 ♠ |
Pass |
| 4 ♠ |
All pass |
|
|
♣Q
There are some auctions where the suit you should lead to trick one stands out. This is one of them. You should lead a trump almost without reference to your hand, since dummy is almost sure to want to ruff a diamond or two on the board. It is quite close as to whether to lead a high or low trump; I go for low; my reasoning is that when partner has any doubleton honor, this lead rates to work out far better.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ Q J 6 2
♥ Q 7
♦ Q 6 2
♣ K 10 9 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
Pass |
1 ♦ |
| Pass |
1 ♥ |
Pass |
1 ♠ |
| All pass |
|
|
|
December 13th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
|
Why does the IMP table exist in team games? Would it not be simpler just to use total points?
Midshipman Easy, Monterey, Calif.
The answer is that it would be simpler but not necessarily fairer. The point is that one giant swing (a grand slam for example on finding a queen) is nearly equivalent to four game swings at the same vulnerability in total points. The idea of the IMP table is to equalize out the big swings with the medium and smaller swings. It is relatively easy to get the hang of – trust me!
I held ♠ Q-9-8-4, ♥ A-3, ♦ K-10-6-3, ♣ Q-8-6 and elected to open one diamond in third seat. When my partner responded one heart, I did not think I could pass, so bid one spade. The next thing I knew I was in four spades, doubled and down 500. My partner said he thought I must have a good opener or I would have passed at my second turn. Do you agree?
Two in the Glue, Wilmington, N.C.
I do not agree. Your second call shows shape, not necessarily high cards. You can bypass a weak spade suit with 4-4 pattern if you want, but I agree with your actions here. Your partner was simply guilty of wishful thinking.
At teams my partner opened one diamond, and my RHO overcalled one spade. I held ace-queen fourth of spades, a doubleton heart, queen-third of diamonds and king-queen fourth of clubs. What do I bid – do I blast three no-trump directly, or start by bidding two clubs? If the latter, any thoughts as to what to do over a two diamond rebid from my partner?
Modern Millie, East Stroudsburg, Pa.
|
I think your two club call is best, since a jump to three no-trump may lead to playing game off the whole heart suit. This problem is not resolved at your second turn, so I might cuebid two spades now, planning to raise diamonds or bid no-trump as appropriate. The two spade call initially asks, not tells.
I was in third seat holding ♠ A-K-8-6, ♥ J-9-4, ♦ Q-10-7, ♣ K-9-2 and heard my partner open two hearts in first seat vulnerable. How close is this to inviting to game? I passed and found my partner with six solid hearts, so three no-trump had decent play, while four hearts was poor.
Stick-in-the-Mud, Augusta, Ga.
Your caution was reasonable, since your balanced hand-pattern made the prospects for game relatively limited. Make the club two the diamond two, and I do try for game, since the prospect of a club ruff in your hand or the possibility of establishing a diamond has improved your hand significantly.
Say you hold ♠ Q-4-2, ♥ A-2, ♦ A-J-9-3, ♣ Q-4-3-2. I assume you would open one diamond? If so, you hear partner bid one spade; what should you do next? Is two clubs acceptable? And what if your Left Hand Opponent had overcalled one heart and partner had bid one spade – only guaranteeing four spades?
Raised to the Ground, Bristol, Va.
In both cases a call of one no-trump defines the basic nature of the hand – a minimum balanced opening bid, without four spades. I would raise the response of one spade if it were known to be five, (as it would do if your negative double showed four spades) but I would, if possible, avoid rebidding bid two clubs, which almost guarantees nine cards in the minors.
|
December 12th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 8 Comments
O fat white woman whom nobody loves, Why do you walk through the field in gloves… Missing so much and so much?
Frances Cornford
| E |
North |
| None |
♠ A K 5 2
♥ K 7 4 3
♦ A 5
♣ A 8 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ 9 4
♥ 10 6
♦ J 8 7 2
♣ K Q J 5 2 |
♠ 10 7 3
♥ A J 8 2
♦ Q 10 4 3
♣ 10 6 |
| South |
♠ Q J 8 6
♥ Q 9 5
♦ K 9 6
♣ 9 7 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
Pass |
| Pass |
Pass |
1 ♣ |
Pass |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
3 ♠ |
Pass |
| 4 ♠ |
All pass |
|
|
♣K
As a general rule, when worth a simple raise of partner’s hearts, make the direct raise rather than introduce a spade suit, however strong it is. The logic is that delayed support or simple preference suggests only two trump. If you plan to jump raise partner, by all means bid spades first – especially if it will help partner evaluate his hand. That is not the case today, though.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ Q J 8 6
♥ Q 9 5
♦ K 9 6
♣ 9 7 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
1 ♥ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
December 11th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 7 Comments
The problem in defense is how far you can go without destroying from within what you are trying to defend from without.
Dwight D. Eisenhower
| W |
North |
| E-W |
♠ A K Q 5 4
♥ A 10 8
♦ 4
♣ 10 9 5 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ J 7 6 3 2
♥ K Q 7 6
♦ 8 3 2
♣ K |
♠ 9 8
♥ 9 3 2
♦ K J 9
♣ A 8 7 6 2 |
| South |
♠ 10
♥ J 5 4
♦ A Q 10 7 6 5
♣ Q J 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
Pass |
| 1 ♦ |
Pass |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
| 2 ♦ |
Pass |
2 ♥ |
Pass |
| 2 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
♥Q
On the right day a cautious pass or a somewhat distorted raise to three hearts might win out. But my preference is for a rebid of two no-trump, suggesting invitational values and no particular fit. If partner shows five hearts you will play that suit, of course. Otherwise notrump looks as good as anywhere to me.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 10
♥ J 5 4
♦ A Q 10 7 6 5
♣ Q J 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
2 ♥ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
|
In today’s deal you play four spades, and receive the lead of the heart king to the ace. What are your thoughts?
The spade king is surely with West; and the risk is that you will lose two spades, and two hearts. A simple line, such as playing the spade ace and another spade will lead to West winning his king and persisting with hearts, the fourth round promoting a trump for East. The same danger applies if you play for the intra-finesse (leading low from dummy and covering East’s card, hoping that he began with J-8 or 10-8 doubleton.
One possibility is the specific doubleton J-10 with East. Ace and another trump would work in that instance; but West is more likely to be short in spades than East. You should turn your attention to the idea of negotiating against length in spades with East. That being so, it looks right to duck trick one, hoping East will ruff his partner’s winner on the second round. But West continues with the heart jack, and East pitches a club.
When you win the heart ace you could now play West for a singleton spade king, but better is to play him for precisely the doubleton K-2 or K-8 of spades. Lead the spade nine from hand, with the intention of passing it. If West follows with the eight or two, play low from dummy and let East win the spade 10. You win the club exit and cash the spade ace, then finish drawing trump.