October 15th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 2 Comments
A great social success is a pretty girl who plays her cards as carefully as if she were plain.
F. Scott Fitzgerald
| S |
North |
| Both |
♠ 9 5 3
♥ 7 4 2
♦ A K 8 4 2
♣ 6 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q J 10 8
♥ J 9
♦ Q J 10 6
♣ J 8 5 |
♠ 7 4 2
♥ Q 10 6 5
♦ 9
♣ Q 10 9 3 2 |
| South |
♠ A K 6
♥ A K 8 3
♦ 7 5 3
♣ A K 7 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 2 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♠Q
Without the opposition intervention you would surely have bid one heart rather than pass, since you don’t want to let the opponents get together cheaply and admit weakness here. Now that they have come in, I can see a good case for a jump to three clubs, preemptive, rather than bidding hearts. Your target is to make LHO’s task as hard as possible; this seems to do the trick.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 7 4 2
♥ Q 10 6 5
♦ 9
♣ Q 10 9 3 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♣ |
Dbl. |
| ? |
|
|
|
October 14th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 14 Comments
Great actions are not always true sons Of great and mighty resolutions.
Samuel Butler
| N |
North |
| Both |
♠ 3 2
♥ Q J 6 2
♦ A J 10 3
♣ Q J 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ 10 7
♥ 10
♦ K 5 4 2
♣ A 9 8 7 6 5 |
♠ A K Q 9 6 5
♥ 7 3
♦ Q 9 6
♣ 10 4 |
| South |
♠ J 8 4
♥ A K 9 8 5 4
♦ 8 7
♣ K 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♦ |
1 ♠ |
| 2 ♥ |
Pass |
3 ♥ |
Pass |
| 4 ♥ |
All pass |
|
|
♠10
There is no universal agreement on what opener is showing here. I suggest it shows both minors (4-4 with better clubs or, more likely, 4-5 in the minors) without real extras. With a real reverse, opener jumps to three diamonds, or forces to game by cuebidding two spades. You have just enough to invite game by raising two diamonds to three; but do not suggest no-trump. Let partner do that if he has extras.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 3 2
♥ Q J 6 2
♦ A J 10 3
♣ Q J 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
1 ♣ |
1 ♠ |
| Dbl. |
Pass |
2 ♦ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
October 13th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 2 Comments
Poor intricated soul! Riddling perplexed Labyrinthical soul!
John Donne
| S |
North |
| Both |
♠ J 9 5
♥ K Q 8
♦ K 9 8
♣ J 10 9 5 |
| West |
East |
♠ A 10 8 6
♥ 10 4 3
♦ 10 7 4 2
♣ 7 4 |
♠ Q 7 4 2
♥ 7 6 5 2
♦ J 5 3
♣ A K |
| South |
♠ K 3
♥ A J 9
♦ A Q 6
♣ Q 8 6 3 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♠6
As 10-counts go, this is bare enough to be positively parched. The choice is to cuebid and raise partner’s major, inviting game in the process, or to go with a heavy one spade response, planning to bid hearts if there is further competition. As a passed hand I’d go the more aggressive route, but at pairs I think the discreet one spade call has a lot going for it.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 7 4 2
♥ 7 6 5 2
♦ J 5 3
♣ A K |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♦ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
October 12th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
It is life near the bone where it is sweetest.
Henry Thoreau
| E |
North |
| E-W |
♠ 10 8 7
♥ Q J 6 3
♦ 7 5 4
♣ A Q 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ K Q J 2
♥ 8
♦ K 10 9
♣ K 9 7 3 2 |
♠ A 6 3
♥ 9 5 2
♦ J 8 3
♣ J 10 6 5 |
| South |
♠ 9 5 4
♥ A K 10 7 4
♦ A Q 6 2
♣ 8 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
Pass |
| 1 ♥ |
Dbl. |
2 NT* |
Pass |
| 3 ♦ |
Pass |
3 ♥ |
All pass |
*Jordan – a raise to at least three hearts
♠K
Neither a trump nor a diamond lead looks at all attractive, so the choice comes down to a club or a heart – and again we are looking at the least of evils. There is not much to go on here, but if I am going to lead a heart I might choose the seven not the four. If dummy hits deck with the ace-king, maybe I can persuade declarer not to finesse.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 7 4
♥ Q 7 4
♦ A Q 7 6
♣ K 7 6 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♦ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
2 ♠ |
| All pass |
|
|
|
October 11th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 2 Comments
|
Several years ago I saw a suggestion from you that it may be right to open in first or second seat on a balanced hand with 11 points, consisting of two aces and a king. I have been doing so ever since – admittedly with mixed results. Could you please comment on whether I understood you right, or whether there are other factors to consider.
Stepping Out, Lakeland, Fla.
Opening a balanced 11-count is not mandatory even with great controls, though I might open for the lead with ace-kingfourth in a minor. With any real distributional shape in the hand, I believe 2½ honor tricks constitute a valid opening bid. Non-vulnerable, you want to get your blow in first.
I find the question of whether to advance facing an overcall especially hard. For example, holding ♠ 9-2, ♥ Q-7-6-2, ♦ J-2, ♣ A-Q-7-4-3 should you keep the action open in the fourth seat after hearing one diamond to your left, and one spade from partner, when your RHO passes? If so, what would you bid?
Lying Low, Kingston, Ontario
I think this hand has just too much to pass here. Responding two clubs may get partner off to the right lead if you end up defending, and you can surely stand a retreat to spades from your partner. I do not like the idea of raising with this particular spade holding, and the diamond stopper is too feeble for a call at no-trump.
What is a weak no-trump, and how can a bridge player tell if a bidder is opening with a weak or a strong no-trump?
Square Basher, Selma, Ala.
One can play weak, or 12-14 no-trump “instead of” a strong notrump not “as well as”. Some people do play weak no-trump when non-vulnerable, and strong when vulnerable, but one cannot play both at the same time. In duplicate it is customary to announce the range of your partner’s no-trump call each time it is opened — so it should not come as a surprise to the opponents.
|
We can’t believe we disagree on such a simple sequence after playing 2/1 for 14 years, but we need advice regarding a response of two clubs to one diamond. Has responder denied a major? Should opener always show a major at his second turn? And should opener rebid diamonds if he can?
John and Dee, Salinas, Calif.
There is no ‘right’ answer. My personal preference is for opener to rebid no-trump when balanced, with or without a major, to use calls in a major as natural, guaranteeing long diamonds and some extras, and to raise with four (occasionally three) trumps. A rebid in diamonds shows at least five and an unbalanced hand.
When should you try to find partner’s suit, rather than leading your own, against no-trump? Suppose the bidding has gone one notrump, three no-trumps and you have to lead from: ♠ 7, ♥ 10-9-7-4-3, ♦ Q-8-7, ♣ 9-8-6-2. Since you have little chance to both set up and cash out your anemic heart suit, does it make sense to lead a spade, since partner is likely to have five or more?
Unselfish, Macon, Ga.
Leading short/weak suits with bad hands against notrump is a reasonable policy. But leading a singleton seems wrong, since if this would set the hand, partner might have doubled to get me to lead my short suit. With a 2-4-4-3 Yarborough, a spade is certainly not silly. But on your example hand I’d guess to lead hearts, I think.
|
October 10th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Saturday, September 26th, 2015
Creativity is not intelligence, it is the ability to do what you did not know through the use of what you know.
Michael Bassey Johnson
| S |
North |
| E-W |
♠ J 6 4 3
♥ 5
♦ Q 10 6
♣ J 8 6 3 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ 10 9 8
♥ 10 2
♦ 9 8 2
♣ A Q 9 7 4 |
♠ 5 2
♥ J 9 7 6
♦ K J 7 4
♣ K 10 5 |
| South |
♠ A K Q 7
♥ A K Q 8 4 3
♦ A 5 3
♣ — |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 2 ♣ |
Pass |
2 ♦ |
Pass |
| 2 ♥ |
Pass |
2 NT |
Pass |
| 3 ♠ |
Pass |
4 ♠ |
Pass |
| 6 ♠ |
All pass |
|
|
♠10
My answer may raise eyebrows, but I respond light to minor–suit openers, so I’d bid one spade here. I am happy to try to keep the opponents out by simulating more values than I hold. Yes, partner may overdo things; but the usual cliché about omelets and eggs applies here. I’d pass facing an opening bid in any other seat; as soon as one opponent has passed, the need to keep the enemy out declines.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ J 6 4 3
♥ 5
♦ Q 10 6
♣ J 8 6 3 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♦ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
October 9th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
The bad end happily, the good unluckily. That is what tragedy means.
Tom Stoppard
| E |
North |
| Both |
♠ A 8 5
♥ A Q 8 6
♦ A
♣ K Q 8 7 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q 7 3 2
♥ K J 3
♦ 4
♣ 10 6 5 3 2 |
♠ K 9 6
♥ 10 7 4
♦ Q 6 5 3
♣ A J 9 |
| South |
♠ J 10 4
♥ 9 5 2
♦ K J 10 9 8 7 2
♣ — |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
Pass |
| 3 ♦ |
Pass |
5 ♦ |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♥3
Responder’s jump should be played as a splinter – a singleton in support of the last bid suit. So here responder should have short spades and heart support. You are never going to give up short of slam, so it looks simple enough to ask for aces (using keycard to check out the trump king if you play that). It is a good rule that almost all unnecessary jumps are assumed to be shortness, agreeing the last-bid suit.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A 8 5
♥ A Q 8 6
♦ A
♣ K Q 8 7 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♣ |
Pass |
1 ♦ |
Pass |
| 2 ♥ |
Pass |
3 ♠ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
October 8th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
Arm the obdured breast With stubborn patience as with triple steel.
John Milton
| South |
North |
| East-West |
♠ A 6 4
♥ 8 6 3
♦ J 9 7 6 2
♣ Q J |
| West |
East |
♠ J 9 7 2
♥ J 10 9 5
♦ K 8 3
♣ 7 5 |
♠ Q 10 5
♥ —
♦ Q 10 4
♣ A K 9 8 6 3 2 |
| South |
♠ K 8 3
♥ A K Q 7 4 2
♦ A 5
♣ 10 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♥ |
Pass |
2 ♥ |
3 ♣ |
| 4 ♥ |
All pass |
|
|
♣7
Once partner passes your opening call, disappointing as that may seem, your chances of making game here are virtually nil (yes there are hands, but he won’t have one of them, trust me). So rather than trying for game and getting too high, just rebid two hearts, which already shows extras, when facing a known weak hand.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K 8 3
♥ A K Q 7 4 2
♦ A 5
♣ 10 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♥ |
Pass |
Pass |
2 ♣ |
| ? |
|
|
|
October 7th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 13 Comments
There is always a pleasure in unravelling a mystery, in catching at the gossamer clue which will guide to certainty.
Elizabeth Gaskell
| N |
North |
| None |
♠ Q 5
♥ 10 9 4 3 2
♦ 7 3 2
♣ 9 8 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ K 10 9 8 4 2
♥ J 7 5
♦ K
♣ K Q 5 |
♠ 7 3
♥ A K 8 6
♦ 9 6 4
♣ J 10 7 4 |
| South |
♠ A J 6
♥ Q
♦ A Q J 10 8 5
♣ A 6 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
Pass |
Pass |
| 1 ♣ * |
2 ♠ |
Pass |
Pass |
| 3 ♦ |
All pass |
|
|
*Strong, 16+
♥5
Did you pass, assuming partner wanted to defend? If so, write out 100 times “I will not pass my partner’s take-out double”. Once a player doubles for take-out, he can’t convert the meaning of a second low-level double to penalties. The second double is take-out again, showing extras. Repeat your hearts as your weakest option (unless you play the cheapest call to be a second negative here).
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 5
♥ 10 9 4 3 2
♦ 7 3 2
♣ 9 8 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♣ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| 1 ♥ |
2 ♣ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
October 6th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 3 Comments
What would life be without arithmetic, but a scene of horrors?
Tobias Smollett
| S |
North |
| N-S |
♠ 9 4
♥ Q J 9 6 4
♦ Q 8
♣ K J 5 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q J 10 3 2
♥ 5 3
♦ A 9 5
♣ 10 9 3 |
♠ K 7 6 5
♥ 8 2
♦ K 7 6 3
♣ Q 8 7 |
| South |
♠ A 8
♥ A K 10 7
♦ J 10 4 2
♣ A 6 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
2 ♦ |
Pass |
| 3 ♥ |
Pass |
4 ♥ |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♠Q
The question is whether to correct to two hearts when partner has suggested a balanced hand. The 5-4 shape (and shortage in the major partner is unlikely to have length in) makes a two heart call reasonable. I wouldn’t hesitate to make that call if my heart nine were the 10. Now, even facing two small hearts I would have some guarantees that the heart fit would be relatively solid.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 9 4
♥ Q J 9 6 4
♦ Q 8
♣ K J 5 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| Pass |
Pass |
1 ♦ |
Pass |
| 1 ♥ |
Pass |
1 NT |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
|
In today’s deal declarer appears to have an embarrassment of aces and kings, but the route home in three no-trump is less straightforward than it might initially appear. And the play would be considerably more complicated at pairs, where overtricks are, if not worth their weight in gold, certainly selling at a premium.
Against the no-trump game West leads a top spade, and since South does not want to see the defenders shifting to clubs, he wins the first trick and ducks a diamond to East.
That player wins and presses on with spades, and when South ducks, West plays a third spade. Now declarer knows that spades are 4-3, he can duck the next diamond to protect himself against the admittedly unlikely 4-1 diamond break. Today that care is justified! At matchpoint pairs it is far from clear that you would give up on the overtricks; it is far more likely that diamonds break (or are long in the hand with short spades) than that today’s distribution needs to be protected against. At teams or rubber, making the contract is paramount and one can let the overtricks look after themselves.
If spades had turned out to be 5-2, declarer would win the third spade and lead a low diamond towards dummy. West would follow suit, and declarer would have to rely on diamonds breaking, since he could not afford to duck the diamond and see West win the trick and cash out. When the diamonds do not break, he would have no realistic chance of success.