Aces on Bridge — Daily Columns

The Aces on Bridge: Monday, September 21st, 2015

Prosperity doth best discover vice, but adversity doth best discover virtue.

Francis Bacon


S North
E-W ♠ A 10 7
 A Q J 2
 3 2
♣ A Q J 10
West East
♠ Q 6 3
 10
 9 8 7 6 5
♣ 8 6 5 4
♠ J 5 2
 8 7
 K Q J 10
♣ K 9 3 2
South
♠ K 9 8 4
 K 9 6 5 4 3
 A 4
♣ 7
South West North East
1 Pass 2 NT* Pass
3 ♣** Pass 3 ♠ Pass
4 Pass 4 NT Pass
5 Pass 5 NT Pass
6 All pass    

*Jacoby; a game-forcing heart raise

**Shortage

9

Today’s deal may have a relatively simple theme, but it is one that might elude the non-expert. See what you think.

In today’s auction a light oneheart opening and a Jacoby two no-trump raise (showing four trump and game-forcing values) reveals the club singleton in the South hand. Cue bids show the pointed aces and Roman Key Card Blackwood follows, disclosing no keycards are missing. The five no-trump call is looking for a grand slam, promising all the keycards, but South firmly puts the brakes on.

Against six hearts West leads the diamond nine, best for the defense. Declarer wins the ace, draws two rounds of trumps and then plays the club ace followed by the queen, discarding a diamond. The finesse wins, but in a sense that is immaterial.

Later declarer discards one of his two spades on the club jack-10 and so makes twelve tricks; two spades, six hearts, one diamond and three clubs.

The point of this hand is that although the finesse can be taken either way, there is a difference in the timing and the number of discards for his losing diamonds that declarer can obtain.

As you can see, even if the ruffing club finesse fails and West wins the club king, declarer would still have 12 tricks. Crucially, the losing diamond has already been discarded. However if the direct club finesse is taken, then East might be able to win his king (as here) and cash a diamond winner.


Declarer sounds as if he has at least five clubs, together with three or four spades to a top honor. To kill spade ruffs in dummy, a trump lead feels right. You are not especially worried about declarer setting up and running the hearts, but preventing the spade ruffs cannot wait.

LEAD WITH THE ACES

♠ A 7 4
 J 10 8 4
 5 3 2
♣ J 7 4
South West North East
      Pass
Pass 1 1 ♠ 1 NT
2 ♠ Pass Pass 3 ♣
All pass      

For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog. Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2015. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Sunday, September 20th, 2015

Holding ♠ J-7-6, Q-10, A-J-8-7-2, ♣ K-4-3 would you overcall one diamond over one club? Would the vulnerability or form of scoring matter? If you would not act, how much more would you need to bid?

Through the Rye, Wausau, Wis.

I tend to overcall freely at the one-level with decent suits. Yes the diamond spots are not impressive, but the two honors in the suit encourage me to act over one club at any form of scoring or vulnerability. Note that this applies to a one-level action only. By contrast I would never overcall two diamonds over a major-suit opening at any form of scoring or vulnerability.

Does an unopposed sequence such as one diamond – one heart – two diamonds – two spades guarantee either four spades, or five hearts? Would you call it a reverse — or if not, what precisely does it show?

Shape Shifter, Tampa, Fla.

The two spade call is essentially natural (but may be only a three-carder at a pinch). Responder may pass a minimum rebid by opener at his third turn, such as three diamonds, and maybe even two no-trump. However, opener cannot let responder out below game. If responder has real extra shape, he can show it by rebidding spades next.

Recently, my LHO opened one club, and RHO bid one diamond. Holding ♠ A-J-8-7-6, ♠ Q-10-9-7-2, K, ♣ 6-5, I ventured two notrump to show both majors. LHO passed, and my partner drove me to game with four hearts and a nine-count. With the heart finesse working, game required my partner to find the spade queen (and he managed that too). The result was fine, but did I do too much?

Lucky Luke, Newport News, Va.

Your choice of the unusual two no-trump sounds right to me. You are, after all, 5-5 with all your values mainly in your long suits. Your partner played you for a fraction more than you had, but game was playable (and the opponents might have had a good contract in clubs but you kept them out!). I like both of your choices. As you indicated, you were a little aggressive and a little lucky. That isn’t yet a federal crime.

Can you explain the term Crawling Stayman to me please? Does it apply to an auction where the Stayman bidder follows up with two spades?

Gold Miner, Grand Forks, N.D.

Classical Crawling Stayman uses the sequence of Stayman followed by two hearts to show a weak hand with no game interest and both majors. Opener passes, or corrects two hearts to two spades with 3-2 in the majors. Stayman followed by two spades is more controversial. I like to use the sequence as a mild invitation with five spades in an unbalanced hand, but all sorts of alternative treatments, such as weak with five spades and four hearts, make sense too.

With: ♠ K-10-2, A-Q-6-4-3, 10, ♣ A-Q-7-4 I opened one heart, and heard a one spade overcall. My partner raised to two hearts and my RHO joined in with three diamonds. Should I have bid game, or just competed to three hearts? That last call would not be an invitation, would it?

Climbing High, Woodland Hills, Calif.

When the opponents compete to the maximum level (so you have no space for a game try) use double as a game-try, called a Maximal Double. Then three hearts becomes purely competitive, barring partner from re-raising. However, when the opponents have not agreed a fit (as here) it may be right to play double as defensive. If three diamonds guaranteed a spade fit, double would be maximal.


For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog. Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2015. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Saturday, September 19th, 2015

Look on every exit as being an entrance somewhere else.

Tom Stoppard


N North
Both ♠ A Q J 8 7 3
 A J
 A 7 4
♣ K 8
West East
♠ 6
 Q 7 6 2
 J 6 5
♣ J 10 7 6 5
♠ K 10 9 5 4
 10 9 8 5 3
 Q 9
♣ Q
South
♠ 2
 K 4
 K 10 8 3 2
♣ A 9 4 3 2
South West North East
    1 ♠ Pass
2 Pass 2 NT Pass
3 ♣ Pass 3 Pass
4 ♣ Pass 4 Pass
5 Pass 6 All pass
       

♠6

In the McConnell trophy in Montreal the Netherlands women’s team sneaked past their quarter-final opponents, thanks to this deal.

While the Dutch North-South pair had taken 10 tricks in three no-trump, Nicola Smith and Heather Dhondy for England bid to an excellent spot. On any lead but a low club the contract is makeable, but only by setting up the spades at once before drawing two rounds of trumps. It looks to me as if on a spade lead that is a not totally unreasonable line to follow. Instead Dhondy quite logically played the club king and another club. When van der Pas discarded, (ruffing in and playing a spade would have set the hand by force) declarer won and drew two trumps ending in dummy. Now she advanced the spade queen, covered and ruffed and overruffed. Again, the defenders could have done better on this trick than they did.

But now Bep Vriend as West carefully exited with the club jack, ruffed in dummy, and Dhondy trumped a spade back to hand to lead a low heart up. Vriend saw her chance and put in the queen! Had she played low, declarer would have finessed the jack to get the extra entry to dummy to ruff out and enjoy the spades. As it was, declarer was now an entry short to set up the spades, and had to concede a black-suit loser at the end. That meant down one and 12IMPs to the Dutch, a 24IMP turnover on the board in a match England lost by 20IMPs.


Clearly, you should not pass here; but you could sensibly bid either two diamonds, planning to give up over a spade rebid from your partner, or you could respond one no-trump. The latter seems to get you to a 5-4 minor fit whenever one is available, since it lets partner bid his second suit more easily, so I would opt for that.

BID WITH THE ACES

♠ 2
 K 4
 K 10 8 3 2
♣ A 9 4 3 2
South West North East
      Pass
Pass 1 1 ♠ Pass
?      

For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog. Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2015. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Friday, September 18th, 2015

Don’t view me with a critic’s eye
But pass my imperfections by.

David Everett


W North
N-S ♠ A K 8 6 4
 3
 A K 10 5
♣ A 4 3
West East
♠ Q 10 7 5 2
 6 5
 Q 9 6 4 2
♣ 5
♠ 9
 K 10 9 2
 J 7 3
♣ K J 8 7 6
South
♠ J 3
 A Q J 8 7 4
 8
♣ Q 10 9 2
South West North East
  Pass 1 ♠ Pass
1 NT Pass 3 Pass
3 Pass 3 NT All pass
       

2

In the semi-final of the women’s teams in the 2002 McConnell trophy, both tables declared three no-trump by South. Randi Montin received the challenging lead of the diamond two. She guessed well to play low from dummy and Jet Pasman put in the diamond seven, which was not likely to be the right play. This let Montin score her eight, and declarer now tried to set up the clubs by passing the club queen (though maybe the shortage of entries to hand might suggest the alternative approach of leading to the ace?). When Pasman won and shifted to the spade nine, declarer eventually was able to throw West on lead in diamonds, to build an extra spade trick for dummy and make her game.

Kerri Sanborn also led a diamond, which went to Irina Levitina’s jack. Now on the heart shift van Zwol took the queen and passed the club queen to Levitina. The spade nine went to the jack, queen, and king, and van Zwol cashed the spade ace to find the bad news there.

The critical play came on this trick when Levitina pitched a heart rather than a club. Van Zwol did her best by cashing the diamond ace-king and the club ace, then exiting with a club. But Levitina won that and returned a club, and declarer, down to all hearts, had to play ace and another heart. Levitina had the last two tricks with the heart king and the 13th club. Had East pitched a club on the second spade, she might well have been endplayed with a low heart, to lead that suit back at trick 12 into declarer’s tenace.


The simple route is to jump to three hearts (or even more trustingly) to four hearts. But will either you or your partner know what to do over a bid of four spades? I wouldn’t bet on it. Far more descriptive is for you as a passed hand to jump to three clubs to show a fit jump with heart support and a decent source of tricks in clubs. This will help partner judge a competitive auction far better.

BID WITH THE ACES

♠ 9
 K 10 9 2
 J 7 3
♣ K J 8 7 6
South West North East
Pass Pass 1 Dbl.
?      

For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog. Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2015. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Thursday, September 17th, 2015

I am amazed that anyone who has made a fortune should send for his friends.

Aristophanes


S North
N-S ♠ K Q 7 6
 Q 8 2
 A 6
♣ A K 8 2
West East
♠ 10 9
 9 3
 K 8 5 4
♣ Q 9 7 6 3
♠ J 3 2
 A K J 6
 10 9 7 3 2
♣ 4
South
♠ A 8 5 4
 10 7 5 4
 Q J
♣ J 10 5
South West North East
Pass Pass 1 ♣* 1
1 NT Pass 2 NT Pass
3 ♠ Pass 4 ♠ All pass

*Strong, 16+

9

On this deal from the McConnell trophy in Montreal in 2002 three no-trump is easy. However, if you are going to play four spades, you would surely want to play it from the North side so you can protect your heart queen…wouldn’t you?

When this happened at one table in the finals, the defense led three rounds of hearts, as happened against Disa Eythorsdottir. On the diamond return at trick four declarer correctly rose with the diamond ace, since whatever she did, she needed the club finesse, but might not need the diamond finesse or might have a squeeze.

Disa next played the spade king and a spade to the ace (leading to the spade eight, playing the Theory of Restricted Choice would have allowed her to make). Next she passed the club jack, as West ducked, of course; then declarer ran the club 10, covered and ruffed by East, who returned a diamond for two down.

In the other room – on the auction shown – Lynn Deas played four spades from the wrong side. The defense led a heart to the jack, then played heart king, heart ace and another heart. This seemed like the obvious defense, since East knew that there was no diamond trick on defense and that there might be a trump promotion. West ruffed the heart with the spade nine, and Deas overruffed, played the spade king and guessed very well to finesse in spades, then passed the club jack.

Once the club jack held, declarer drew the last trump, and tested clubs from the top. When they didn’t break, Deas ruffed a club to hand and ran the diamond queen; contract made.


I could understand the logic of bidding one spade; you do after all have clubs and spades. But you have a balanced hand best described by rebidding two no-trumps. If you do that you may find a black-suit fit subsequently, but if you bid one spade you can never show your precise values later on.

BID WITH THE ACES

♠ K Q 7 6
 Q 8 2
 A 6
♣ A K 8 2
South West North East
      Pass
1 ♣ Pass 1 Pass
?      

For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog. Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2015. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Wednesday, September 16th, 2015

Ill fortune never crushed that man whom good fortune deceived not.

Ben Jonson


N North
E-W ♠ K 6 4 3 2
 A 6 3
 7 2
♣ 9 4 3
West East
♠ 7
 8 4
 K 9 8 6 4
♣ K 8 7 5 2
♠ A J 8 5
 9 5 2
 J 10
♣ Q J 10 6
South
♠ Q 10 9
 K Q J 10 7
 A Q 5 3
♣ A
South West North East
    Pass Pass
1 Pass 1 ♠ Pass
3 Pass 3 Pass
3 ♠ Pass 4 All pass
       

♣2

Today’s deal comes from the finals of the McConnell women’s teams. In one room Judi Radin responded one spade to one heart as North. That got Valerie Westheimer to a reasonable spot, but it warned Kerri Sanborn to lead a club. Westheimer might have drawn one round of trumps, but she actually led the spade 10 to the spade king at trick two, and Irina Levitina won and returned a spade. Westheimer rose with the spade queen – hardly an unreasonable play, was it? Sanborn ruffed and returned a club, and now Westheimer ruffed, and crossed to dummy with the heart ace to take the diamond finesse. When that lost, the hand fell to pieces; she emerged with seven tricks, and can hardly be said to have done too much wrong.

In the other room Rozanne Pollack led her singleton spade against four hearts, of course. East put in the spade jack and declarer, Jill Meyers, won and tried the spade 10. Pollack ruffed and led a trump, and Meyers won and cashed a second heart, finding the bad news. Then she led her last spade; had East ducked this, Meyers would have had to play the diamond ace followed by the diamond queen to ensure her ruff – which she might well have done, given the fact that West clearly had 10 minor-suit cards. But East took the third spade, and the hand was over. In fact Meyers could take the diamond finesse for an overtrick.


I would not feel embarrassed to keep the auction open with a call of one spade. I am at the one-level and already a passed hand; my partner won’t get overly excited by my responding here, and it makes life far harder for the opening bidder to come back in when he has a marginal action. If you pass here, he has a far easier re-opening decision.

BID WITH THE ACES

♠ K 6 4 3 2
 A 6 3
 7 2
♣ 9 4 3
South West North East
Pass 1 ♣ 1 Pass
?      

For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog. Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2015. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Tuesday, September 15th, 2015

We are all strong enough to bear the misfortunes of others.

Duc de La Rochefoucauld


S North
None ♠ 9 5 3
 J 8 7 3
 J 9 5 4
♣ J 2
West East
♠ 8 7 6
 5 2
 K Q 8 7 3
♣ Q 7 6
♠ K Q J 2
 9 6
 10 6
♣ A K 10 9 3
South
♠ A 10 4
 A K Q 10 4
 A 2
♣ 8 5 4
South West North East
1 Pass 1 NT Dbl.
2 NT Pass 3 Pass
4 All pass    

K

In today’s deal from the 2002 McConnell teams semi-finals even three hearts has no play on accurate defense. So when one table stopped low and one bid game, you can guess who picked up the swing, right?

In the match between an American and a Dutch team, East had the first problem, when North passed the one heart opener. I fancy two clubs myself, expecting to bid spades later. And note that not only does the deal belong to East-West in clubs, but you also get partner off to the right lead. However, after the American East doubled, West sold out to two hearts and led a top diamond; now the only issue was the second overtrick.

In the other room where Irina Levitina was declarer on the auction shown, the 10th trick was far more important. The auction suggests that North-South may not have been on entirely firm ground as to whether responding one notrump with the North cards was expected – or maybe as to whether the three heart call was forcing – but note that here too East had passed up her opportunity to get partner off to the right lead. When Wietske van Zwol led a top diamond, Levitina won and drew two rounds of trumps before playing a diamond back. It was very tough for van Zwol to work out to duck – though I suspect it might be the percentage play. When she took her queen, declarer had two homes for her spade losers. Had West ducked, she loses her diamond trick but gets two spade winners in return.


There is a straightforward choice here. You can make the call to show a second negative – which should be either two no-trump or three clubs, depending on partnership style. (For what it is worth, I prefer three clubs here.) Or you can jump to four hearts, suggesting trump support but a bad hand – no ace or king and no singleton in a side suit. I marginally prefer the latter route, but it is close.

BID WITH THE ACES

♠ 9 5 3
 J 8 7 3
 J 9 5 4
♣ J 2
South West North East
  Pass 2 ♣ Pass
2 Pass 2 Pass
?      

For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog. Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2015. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Monday, September 14th, 2015

Knowledge may give weight, but accomplishments give luster, and many more people see than weigh.

Earl of Chesterfield


S North
N-S ♠ K 10 9 2
 Q
 K J 9 8
♣ A 8 7 3
West East
♠ J 5
 K 9 7 5 3
 A 10
♣ K Q J 5
♠ 6 4 3
 J 10 8 4
 Q 7 6 4
♣ 6 4
South
♠ A Q 8 7
 A 6 2
 5 3 2
♣ 10 9 2
South West North East
Pass 1 Dbl. 2
4 ♠ All pass    

♣K

All the deals this week come from the later stages of the women’s teams championships in Montreal. Both Norths doubled a one heart bid, but at one table in the finals Judi Radin as East jumped to three hearts, and Irina Levitina bid three spades, then doubled Valerie Westheimer’s four heart call.

After a spade lead to the ace followed by the club 10 shift, Kerri Sanborn cashed the second spade, then got out with a third spade. Declarer eventually built an entry to dummy to take the losing heart finesse, in a position where there were certainly some indications that leading to the heart king was the right play (the combination of no four spade call from North and the final double by South). Down 500.

In our featured room Disa Eythorsdottir did reach four spades. Jill Meyers led a top club, ducked, and now a top club continuation is best. Meyers gave declarer a chance when she played the diamond ace and another diamond, as Randi Montin encouraged. When Disa won the king and drew all the trumps, she could now get one pitch for her heart loser, but still had to lose two clubs and two diamonds. Down one.

The winning line was to play West for the 2-5-2-4 shape that the defense at the table had perhaps suggested. Go up with the diamond king at trick three, and ruff two hearts in dummy using trumps as a re-entry to your hand. Then draw a second round of trumps and you can now set up the fourth diamond to pitch your losing club, since West has no trumps left.


Clearly, you are going to lead a minor, so the question is whether to pick the more aggressive or more passive option. Dummy rates to put down only four (or perhaps five) cards in the minors. It looks natural to me to try to cash winners if you can, before declarer discards losers from one suit on the other (or on dummy’s hearts). That being the case, I’ll go for a club rather than a diamond.

LEAD WITH THE ACES

♠ K 6 2
 Q 8 3 2
 10 7 2
♣ Q 8 7
South West North East
  1 Pass 1 ♠
Pass 2 ♠ Pass 4 ♠
All pass      

For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog. Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2015. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Sunday, September 13th, 2015

I know most people play a double of a four heart opening bid as optional – maybe with an emphasis on take-out. What about a double of four spades, or a double after partner opens and the next hand overcalls four spades? I’d also be interested to know how the experts treat doubles of five-level overcalls.

Hunting the Snark, Galveston, Texas

I’d say that most play that one removes a double of four spades to a contract one expects to make, but otherwise passes. The same applies even more clearly to a double of a five-level bid. Try not to remove the double from fear; play partner for the odd trick or two for his double, and hope he can beat their contract in his own hand.

I had always been taught that the double of a major always showed the ability to play in the other major. Is that right or if a hand is strong enough can you start by doubling on a one or two-suited hand?

Heartfelt Harry, Albany, Ga.

With spades and a strong hand one can generally double, then insist on playing one’s suit. With hearts the position is less clear. The problem is that if the opponents bid spades you may find it hard to introduce your suit at a convenient level. Doubling with a one-suiter in spades is fine by me on 17 or so. If you have another one-suiter or a two-suiter, you need even more to start with a double.

I have seen your comments on leading high from three or four small in a suit you have raised. Would you lead your highest card if you had four card support: J-94-2, for instance?

Mumbles, Schaumburg, Ill.

This holding looks appropriate for a low card lead to me (the jack is an honor here). Whenever partner might need to know count, I’d try to give him that on lead (playing third and fifth leads the count is easier to read than in standard fourth highest methods, by the way). Whenever I think it is important to partner to know if I have an honor, I go with a high or low card as appropriate.

Can you comment on when, if ever, opener can rebid a five-card suit, without it promising six?

Nanny Goat, Staten Island, N.Y.

Opener strives not to repeat a five-card suit after a one-level response. Exceptions come (typically over partner’s one spade response) when with a 2-4-2-5 pattern and 12-15, including a small doubleton in diamonds, you might repeat the clubs. Things are different after a 2/1 game-forcing auction. If you play opener’s new suit at the three-level shows five or extras, and that two no-trump guarantees stoppers (or length) in the unbid suits, you sometimes have to rebid a chunky five-carder.

If the opponents overcall my partner’s opening bid, should I use weak-jump responses? Or is there a better meaning for jumps in new suits?

Grasshopper Mind, Laredo, Texas

I hate weak jump responses if the opponents are silent – I see no reason to preempt our side out of the auction when the opponents have shown no sign of bidding. But when the opponents overcall or double, using a jump as weak makes sense, particularly by an unpassed hand. And all jump raises in competition should always be weak. By passed hands, use fit-jumps in all new suits.


For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog. Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2015. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Saturday, September 12th, 2015

Without leaps of imagination or dreaming, we lose the excitement of possibilities. Dreaming, after all is a form of planning.

Gloria Steinem


N North
None ♠ A 7
 K Q J 6
 K Q 10 4
♣ A K 7
West East
♠ 3
 10 9 7 4
 J 9 8 3
♣ J 6 4 2
♠ K Q J 10 9 8 6
 8
 7 6
♣ Q 10 5
South
♠ 5 4 2
 A 5 3 2
 A 5 2
♣ 9 8 3
South West North East
    2 ♣ 2 ♠
Pass Pass Dbl. Pass
3 ♠ Pass 4 Pass
5 Pass 6 All pass
       

♠3

Today’s deal presented an awkward problem for South after the intervention over two clubs. His pass promised at least semipositive values, since with 0-4 points South would have doubled two spades. Then, facing a takeout double, he cuebid and next jumped to five hearts since he thought he had too much for a simple call of four hearts over four diamonds. So he reached the normal slam in unusual fashion.

After the lead of the spade three to the ace there was no point in trying to ruff a spade in dummy immediately, given the weak trumps in hand and the shortage of entries back to South. Instead it looked right to take the heart king and queen, hoping for the hearts to break. If they had done so, you would draw trump and give up a spade, hoping to be able to work out the ending in the fullness of time.

However, the 4-1 trump break was very bad news. See if you can find a legitimate play for the contract now. In fact the least unlikely chance to play for is to hope West holds four diamonds in addition to his four hearts – certainly not impossible, given East’s overcall.

You must take the diamond king and ace, then lead a diamond to the 10. The diamond queen allows you to throw a club as West continues to follow suit. Then the club ace-king and a club ruff brings the trick total to 11. The heart jack in dummy is the 12th winner.


Were you tempted to raise spades, or to respond one no-trump? When partner bids two suits and you have decent support for the first-bid suit, simply give preference to that suit. Yes, diamonds scores less well than making a spade or notrump contract. But the last time I checked, it was better to go plus than minus. Even a partial club stopper might tempt me to settle for a call of one no-trump.

BID WITH THE ACES

♠ 5 4 2
 A 5 3 2
 A 5 2
♣ 9 8 3
South West North East
    1 Pass
1 Pass 1 ♠ Pass
?      

For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog. Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2015. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].