October 5th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 2 Comments
Prosperity doth best discover vice, but adversity doth best discover virtue.
Francis Bacon
| S |
North |
| E-W |
♠ A 10 7
♥ A Q J 2
♦ 3 2
♣ A Q J 10 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q 6 3
♥ 10
♦ 9 8 7 6 5
♣ 8 6 5 4 |
♠ J 5 2
♥ 8 7
♦ K Q J 10
♣ K 9 3 2 |
| South |
♠ K 9 8 4
♥ K 9 6 5 4 3
♦ A 4
♣ 7 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♥ |
Pass |
2 NT* |
Pass |
| 3 ♣** |
Pass |
3 ♠ |
Pass |
| 4 ♦ |
Pass |
4 NT |
Pass |
| 5 ♥ |
Pass |
5 NT |
Pass |
| 6 ♥ |
All pass |
|
|
*Jacoby; a game-forcing heart raise
**Shortage
♦9
Declarer sounds as if he has at least five clubs, together with three or four spades to a top honor. To kill spade ruffs in dummy, a trump lead feels right. You are not especially worried about declarer setting up and running the hearts, but preventing the spade ruffs cannot wait.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ A 7 4
♥ J 10 8 4
♦ 5 3 2
♣ J 7 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
Pass |
| Pass |
1 ♥ |
1 ♠ |
1 NT |
| 2 ♠ |
Pass |
Pass |
3 ♣ |
| All pass |
|
|
|
October 4th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 13 Comments
|
Holding ♠ J-7-6, ♥ Q-10, ♦ A-J-8-7-2, ♣ K-4-3 would you overcall one diamond over one club? Would the vulnerability or form of scoring matter? If you would not act, how much more would you need to bid?
Through the Rye, Wausau, Wis.
I tend to overcall freely at the one-level with decent suits. Yes the diamond spots are not impressive, but the two honors in the suit encourage me to act over one club at any form of scoring or vulnerability. Note that this applies to a one-level action only. By contrast I would never overcall two diamonds over a major-suit opening at any form of scoring or vulnerability.
Does an unopposed sequence such as one diamond – one heart – two diamonds – two spades guarantee either four spades, or five hearts? Would you call it a reverse — or if not, what precisely does it show?
Shape Shifter, Tampa, Fla.
The two spade call is essentially natural (but may be only a three-carder at a pinch). Responder may pass a minimum rebid by opener at his third turn, such as three diamonds, and maybe even two no-trump. However, opener cannot let responder out below game. If responder has real extra shape, he can show it by rebidding spades next.
Recently, my LHO opened one club, and RHO bid one diamond. Holding ♠ A-J-8-7-6, ♠ Q-10-9-7-2, ♦ K, ♣ 6-5, I ventured two notrump to show both majors. LHO passed, and my partner drove me to game with four hearts and a nine-count. With the heart finesse working, game required my partner to find the spade queen (and he managed that too). The result was fine, but did I do too much?
Lucky Luke, Newport News, Va.
|
Your choice of the unusual two no-trump sounds right to me. You are, after all, 5-5 with all your values mainly in your long suits. Your partner played you for a fraction more than you had, but game was playable (and the opponents might have had a good contract in clubs but you kept them out!). I like both of your choices. As you indicated, you were a little aggressive and a little lucky. That isn’t yet a federal crime.
Can you explain the term Crawling Stayman to me please? Does it apply to an auction where the Stayman bidder follows up with two spades?
Gold Miner, Grand Forks, N.D.
Classical Crawling Stayman uses the sequence of Stayman followed by two hearts to show a weak hand with no game interest and both majors. Opener passes, or corrects two hearts to two spades with 3-2 in the majors. Stayman followed by two spades is more controversial. I like to use the sequence as a mild invitation with five spades in an unbalanced hand, but all sorts of alternative treatments, such as weak with five spades and four hearts, make sense too.
With: ♠ K-10-2, ♥ A-Q-6-4-3, ♦ 10, ♣ A-Q-7-4 I opened one heart, and heard a one spade overcall. My partner raised to two hearts and my RHO joined in with three diamonds. Should I have bid game, or just competed to three hearts? That last call would not be an invitation, would it?
Climbing High, Woodland Hills, Calif.
When the opponents compete to the maximum level (so you have no space for a game try) use double as a game-try, called a Maximal Double. Then three hearts becomes purely competitive, barring partner from re-raising. However, when the opponents have not agreed a fit (as here) it may be right to play double as defensive. If three diamonds guaranteed a spade fit, double would be maximal.
|
October 3rd, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
Look on every exit as being an entrance somewhere else.
Tom Stoppard
| N |
North |
| Both |
♠ A Q J 8 7 3
♥ A J
♦ A 7 4
♣ K 8 |
| West |
East |
♠ 6
♥ Q 7 6 2
♦ J 6 5
♣ J 10 7 6 5 |
♠ K 10 9 5 4
♥ 10 9 8 5 3
♦ Q 9
♣ Q |
| South |
♠ 2
♥ K 4
♦ K 10 8 3 2
♣ A 9 4 3 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♠ |
Pass |
| 2 ♦ |
Pass |
2 NT |
Pass |
| 3 ♣ |
Pass |
3 ♦ |
Pass |
| 4 ♣ |
Pass |
4 ♥ |
Pass |
| 5 ♦ |
Pass |
6 ♦ |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♠6
Clearly, you should not pass here; but you could sensibly bid either two diamonds, planning to give up over a spade rebid from your partner, or you could respond one no-trump. The latter seems to get you to a 5-4 minor fit whenever one is available, since it lets partner bid his second suit more easily, so I would opt for that.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 2
♥ K 4
♦ K 10 8 3 2
♣ A 9 4 3 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
Pass |
| Pass |
1 ♥ |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
October 2nd, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 7 Comments
Don’t view me with a critic’s eye But pass my imperfections by.
David Everett
| W |
North |
| N-S |
♠ A K 8 6 4
♥ 3
♦ A K 10 5
♣ A 4 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q 10 7 5 2
♥ 6 5
♦ Q 9 6 4 2
♣ 5 |
♠ 9
♥ K 10 9 2
♦ J 7 3
♣ K J 8 7 6 |
| South |
♠ J 3
♥ A Q J 8 7 4
♦ 8
♣ Q 10 9 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
3 ♦ |
Pass |
| 3 ♥ |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♦2
The simple route is to jump to three hearts (or even more trustingly) to four hearts. But will either you or your partner know what to do over a bid of four spades? I wouldn’t bet on it. Far more descriptive is for you as a passed hand to jump to three clubs to show a fit jump with heart support and a decent source of tricks in clubs. This will help partner judge a competitive auction far better.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 9
♥ K 10 9 2
♦ J 7 3
♣ K J 8 7 6 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| Pass |
Pass |
1 ♥ |
Dbl. |
| ? |
|
|
|
October 1st, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 19 Comments
I am amazed that anyone who has made a fortune should send for his friends.
Aristophanes
| S |
North |
| N-S |
♠ K Q 7 6
♥ Q 8 2
♦ A 6
♣ A K 8 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ 10 9
♥ 9 3
♦ K 8 5 4
♣ Q 9 7 6 3 |
♠ J 3 2
♥ A K J 6
♦ 10 9 7 3 2
♣ 4 |
| South |
♠ A 8 5 4
♥ 10 7 5 4
♦ Q J
♣ J 10 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| Pass |
Pass |
1 ♣* |
1 ♥ |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
2 NT |
Pass |
| 3 ♠ |
Pass |
4 ♠ |
All pass |
*Strong, 16+
♥9
I could understand the logic of bidding one spade; you do after all have clubs and spades. But you have a balanced hand best described by rebidding two no-trumps. If you do that you may find a black-suit fit subsequently, but if you bid one spade you can never show your precise values later on.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K Q 7 6
♥ Q 8 2
♦ A 6
♣ A K 8 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
Pass |
| 1 ♣ |
Pass |
1 ♥ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
September 30th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 11 Comments
Ill fortune never crushed that man whom good fortune deceived not.
Ben Jonson
| N |
North |
| E-W |
♠ K 6 4 3 2
♥ A 6 3
♦ 7 2
♣ 9 4 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ 7
♥ 8 4
♦ K 9 8 6 4
♣ K 8 7 5 2 |
♠ A J 8 5
♥ 9 5 2
♦ J 10
♣ Q J 10 6 |
| South |
♠ Q 10 9
♥ K Q J 10 7
♦ A Q 5 3
♣ A |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
Pass |
Pass |
| 1 ♥ |
Pass |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
| 3 ♦ |
Pass |
3 ♥ |
Pass |
| 3 ♠ |
Pass |
4 ♥ |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♣2
I would not feel embarrassed to keep the auction open with a call of one spade. I am at the one-level and already a passed hand; my partner won’t get overly excited by my responding here, and it makes life far harder for the opening bidder to come back in when he has a marginal action. If you pass here, he has a far easier re-opening decision.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K 6 4 3 2
♥ A 6 3
♦ 7 2
♣ 9 4 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| Pass |
1 ♣ |
1 ♦ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
September 29th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
We are all strong enough to bear the misfortunes of others.
Duc de La Rochefoucauld
| S |
North |
| None |
♠ 9 5 3
♥ J 8 7 3
♦ J 9 5 4
♣ J 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ 8 7 6
♥ 5 2
♦ K Q 8 7 3
♣ Q 7 6 |
♠ K Q J 2
♥ 9 6
♦ 10 6
♣ A K 10 9 3 |
| South |
♠ A 10 4
♥ A K Q 10 4
♦ A 2
♣ 8 5 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♥ |
Pass |
1 NT |
Dbl. |
| 2 NT |
Pass |
3 ♥ |
Pass |
| 4 ♥ |
All pass |
|
|
♦K
There is a straightforward choice here. You can make the call to show a second negative – which should be either two no-trump or three clubs, depending on partnership style. (For what it is worth, I prefer three clubs here.) Or you can jump to four hearts, suggesting trump support but a bad hand – no ace or king and no singleton in a side suit. I marginally prefer the latter route, but it is close.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 9 5 3
♥ J 8 7 3
♦ J 9 5 4
♣ J 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
2 ♣ |
Pass |
| 2 ♦ |
Pass |
2 ♥ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
September 28th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
Knowledge may give weight, but accomplishments give luster, and many more people see than weigh.
Earl of Chesterfield
| S |
North |
| N-S |
♠ K 10 9 2
♥ Q
♦ K J 9 8
♣ A 8 7 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ J 5
♥ K 9 7 5 3
♦ A 10
♣ K Q J 5 |
♠ 6 4 3
♥ J 10 8 4
♦ Q 7 6 4
♣ 6 4 |
| South |
♠ A Q 8 7
♥ A 6 2
♦ 5 3 2
♣ 10 9 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| Pass |
1 ♥ |
Dbl. |
2 ♥ |
| 4 ♠ |
All pass |
|
|
♣K
Clearly, you are going to lead a minor, so the question is whether to pick the more aggressive or more passive option. Dummy rates to put down only four (or perhaps five) cards in the minors. It looks natural to me to try to cash winners if you can, before declarer discards losers from one suit on the other (or on dummy’s hearts). That being the case, I’ll go for a club rather than a diamond.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ K 6 2
♥ Q 8 3 2
♦ 10 7 2
♣ Q 8 7 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♥ |
Pass |
1 ♠ |
| Pass |
2 ♠ |
Pass |
4 ♠ |
| All pass |
|
|
|
September 27th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 14 Comments
|
I know most people play a double of a four heart opening bid as optional – maybe with an emphasis on take-out. What about a double of four spades, or a double after partner opens and the next hand overcalls four spades? I’d also be interested to know how the experts treat doubles of five-level overcalls.
Hunting the Snark, Galveston, Texas
I’d say that most play that one removes a double of four spades to a contract one expects to make, but otherwise passes. The same applies even more clearly to a double of a five-level bid. Try not to remove the double from fear; play partner for the odd trick or two for his double, and hope he can beat their contract in his own hand.
I had always been taught that the double of a major always showed the ability to play in the other major. Is that right or if a hand is strong enough can you start by doubling on a one or two-suited hand?
Heartfelt Harry, Albany, Ga.
With spades and a strong hand one can generally double, then insist on playing one’s suit. With hearts the position is less clear. The problem is that if the opponents bid spades you may find it hard to introduce your suit at a convenient level. Doubling with a one-suiter in spades is fine by me on 17 or so. If you have another one-suiter or a two-suiter, you need even more to start with a double.
I have seen your comments on leading high from three or four small in a suit you have raised. Would you lead your highest card if you had four card support: J-94-2, for instance?
Mumbles, Schaumburg, Ill.
|
This holding looks appropriate for a low card lead to me (the jack is an honor here). Whenever partner might need to know count, I’d try to give him that on lead (playing third and fifth leads the count is easier to read than in standard fourth highest methods, by the way). Whenever I think it is important to partner to know if I have an honor, I go with a high or low card as appropriate.
Can you comment on when, if ever, opener can rebid a five-card suit, without it promising six?
Nanny Goat, Staten Island, N.Y.
Opener strives not to repeat a five-card suit after a one-level response. Exceptions come (typically over partner’s one spade response) when with a 2-4-2-5 pattern and 12-15, including a small doubleton in diamonds, you might repeat the clubs. Things are different after a 2/1 game-forcing auction. If you play opener’s new suit at the three-level shows five or extras, and that two no-trump guarantees stoppers (or length) in the unbid suits, you sometimes have to rebid a chunky five-carder.
If the opponents overcall my partner’s opening bid, should I use weak-jump responses? Or is there a better meaning for jumps in new suits?
Grasshopper Mind, Laredo, Texas
I hate weak jump responses if the opponents are silent – I see no reason to preempt our side out of the auction when the opponents have shown no sign of bidding. But when the opponents overcall or double, using a jump as weak makes sense, particularly by an unpassed hand. And all jump raises in competition should always be weak. By passed hands, use fit-jumps in all new suits.
|
September 26th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 8 Comments
Without leaps of imagination or dreaming, we lose the excitement of possibilities. Dreaming, after all is a form of planning.
Gloria Steinem
| N |
North |
| None |
♠ A 7
♥ K Q J 6
♦ K Q 10 4
♣ A K 7 |
| West |
East |
♠ 3
♥ 10 9 7 4
♦ J 9 8 3
♣ J 6 4 2 |
♠ K Q J 10 9 8 6
♥ 8
♦ 7 6
♣ Q 10 5 |
| South |
♠ 5 4 2
♥ A 5 3 2
♦ A 5 2
♣ 9 8 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
2 ♣ |
2 ♠ |
| Pass |
Pass |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| 3 ♠ |
Pass |
4 ♦ |
Pass |
| 5 ♥ |
Pass |
6 ♥ |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♠3
Were you tempted to raise spades, or to respond one no-trump? When partner bids two suits and you have decent support for the first-bid suit, simply give preference to that suit. Yes, diamonds scores less well than making a spade or notrump contract. But the last time I checked, it was better to go plus than minus. Even a partial club stopper might tempt me to settle for a call of one no-trump.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 5 4 2
♥ A 5 3 2
♦ A 5 2
♣ 9 8 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♦ |
Pass |
| 1 ♥ |
Pass |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
|
Today’s deal may have a relatively simple theme, but it is one that might elude the non-expert. See what you think.
In today’s auction a light oneheart opening and a Jacoby two no-trump raise (showing four trump and game-forcing values) reveals the club singleton in the South hand. Cue bids show the pointed aces and Roman Key Card Blackwood follows, disclosing no keycards are missing. The five no-trump call is looking for a grand slam, promising all the keycards, but South firmly puts the brakes on.
Against six hearts West leads the diamond nine, best for the defense. Declarer wins the ace, draws two rounds of trumps and then plays the club ace followed by the queen, discarding a diamond. The finesse wins, but in a sense that is immaterial.
Later declarer discards one of his two spades on the club jack-10 and so makes twelve tricks; two spades, six hearts, one diamond and three clubs.
The point of this hand is that although the finesse can be taken either way, there is a difference in the timing and the number of discards for his losing diamonds that declarer can obtain.
As you can see, even if the ruffing club finesse fails and West wins the club king, declarer would still have 12 tricks. Crucially, the losing diamond has already been discarded. However if the direct club finesse is taken, then East might be able to win his king (as here) and cash a diamond winner.