September 25th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 3 Comments
Among all forms of mistake, prophecy is the most gratuitous.
George Eliot
| N |
North |
| N-S |
♠ Q 7 5 2
♥ 8
♦ K J 10 5 2
♣ A K Q |
| West |
East |
♠ A K 9 6
♥ 10 6 5 4 2
♦ 7 4 3
♣ 6 |
♠ 10 8 4
♥ Q 9 3
♦ A Q 9 6
♣ 10 7 3 |
| South |
♠ J 3
♥ A K J 7
♦ 8
♣ J 9 8 5 4 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♦ |
Pass |
| 1 ♥ |
Pass |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
| 2 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♥4
Your partner has suggested a slam, and denied a club control in so doing. When you cooperate by bidding four hearts you should promise a club control (which you have – in spades, so to speak) as well as suggesting suitability for slam. While you certainly would not make a try above the game level, you should allow partner to investigate for slam if he wants.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 7 5 2
♥ 8
♦ K J 10 5 2
♣ A K Q |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♦ |
Pass |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
| 3 ♠ |
Pass |
4 ♦ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
September 24th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
He shall come to judge the quick and the dead.
Book of Common Prayer
| W |
North |
| Both |
♠ A K Q 5
♥ K Q 4
♦ 8 4
♣ A Q 3 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ 8 2
♥ A 10 8
♦ K 7 6
♣ K J 6 5 4 |
♠ J 10 6 4
♥ 9 7 6 5 2
♦ Q 3
♣ 8 7 |
| South |
♠ 9 7 3
♥ J 3
♦ A J 10 9 5 2
♣ 10 9 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 NT* |
Dbl. |
2 ♣ |
| Pass |
Pass |
Dbl. |
2 ♥ |
| Pass |
Pass |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| 2 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
*11 – 14
♠8
The three diamond call is a transfer to hearts, a suit you fit well. Should you do more than bid three hearts as requested? No indeed. Imagine partner with a hand that would pass three hearts (jack-fifth of hearts and the diamond queen, say). You might well be struggling to make even nine tricks. If partner had transferred to spades, I would do more – the fourth trump and ruffing value might be critical.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A K Q 5
♥ K Q 4
♦ 8 4
♣ A Q 3 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 2 NT |
Pass |
3 ♦ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
September 23rd, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 8 Comments
People who don’t take risks generally make about two big mistakes a year. People who do take risks generally make about two big mistakes a year.
Peter Drucker
| E |
North |
| E-W |
♠ 10 9
♥ A K J 4
♦ 10 7 4 2
♣ K 9 5 |
| West |
East |
♠ 8 7 6
♥ Q 8 7 6 5
♦ K J 3
♣ J 3 |
♠ A 3
♥ 9 3
♦ 9 8 5
♣ A Q 10 8 7 4 |
| South |
♠ K Q J 5 4 2
♥ 10 2
♦ A Q 6
♣ 6 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
Pass |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
1 NT |
2 ♣ |
| 2 ♠ |
Pass |
3 ♠ |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♣J
Your partner’s three heart call asks you to describe your hand in terms of spade suit, club fit or diamond stopper. It shows hearts rather than asking about the suit. With a solid diamond stopper bid three no-trump now. You could persuade me that I hadn’t shown the full quality of my spades yet. I agree; but I’d rather head for no-trump first and hope that we can back into spades later. No-trump can’t wait.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K Q J 5 4 2
♥ 10 2
♦ A Q 6
♣ 6 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
2 ♣ |
Pass |
| 2 ♠ |
Pass |
3 ♥ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
September 22nd, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 10 Comments
There are two tragedies in life. One is not to get your heart’s desire. The other is to get it.
G. B. Shaw
| S |
North |
| E-W |
♠ J 10 7
♥ K J 9
♦ A J 3
♣ 7 5 4 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ 9 6 4 3
♥ —
♦ 9 7 6 2
♣ Q J 10 8 6 |
♠ 8 5 2
♥ Q 10 8 4
♦ 10 8 5
♣ K 9 3 |
| South |
♠ A K Q
♥ A 7 6 5 3 2
♦ K Q 4
♣ A |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 2 ♣ |
Pass |
2 ♦ |
Pass |
| 2 ♥ |
Pass |
3 ♥ |
Pass |
| 3 NT* |
Pass |
6 ♥ |
All pass |
*Mild slam try for hearts
♣Q
There are two directions you might go here; you might raise clubs, or bid notrump. I prefer the latter, and though I only have a 10-count, I’m optimistically driving to three notrump, for two reasons. The first is that my four small clubs will help to solidify partner’s suit. The second is that I want to keep the opponents out – they have a lot of major-suit cards after all. A call of two no-trump is also just fine.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ J 10 7
♥ K J 9
♦ A J 3
♣ 7 5 4 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| Pass |
1 ♦ |
2 ♣ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
September 21st, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 9 Comments
To articulate sweet sounds together Is to work harder than all these, and yet Be thought an idler.
W. B. Yeats
| S |
North |
| E-W |
♠ J 7 5 3
♥ 8 5
♦ A 10 8 5 3
♣ A 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ 8 6
♥ J 10 7 4
♦ Q 6 4
♣ Q J 10 3 |
♠ Q 10 9 2
♥ 9 6 3 2
♦ —
♣ 9 8 7 5 2 |
| South |
♠ A K 4
♥ A K Q
♦ K J 9 7 2
♣ K 6 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 2 ♣ |
Pass |
2 ♦ |
Pass |
| 3 NT |
Pass |
6 NT |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♣Q
Nothing looks better here than leading partner’s suit. Having implied length in hearts, should one lead a count card (a fourth highest two, or the three if playing third and low) or the eight? Since declarer rates to be very weak, I don’t feel obliged to clarify the position of the honors for him, and partner should be able to work out what I have from the sight of dummy. I will therefore lead a low heart.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ J 9 5
♥ 8 5 3 2
♦ A 4
♣ A Q 8 7 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♦ |
Pass |
Pass |
| Dbl. |
Rdbl. |
1 ♥ |
1 ♠ |
| All pass |
|
|
|
September 20th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 8 Comments
|
Please tell me the name of the convention, which has appeared in your column more than once. After opener raises responder’s major-suit response, responder bids two no-trump to ask if opener has three- or four-card support, and to determine the strength of opener’s hand. Opener then defines his hand by a three-level response. If you know a name for the convention I would appreciate your publishing it.
Duke of Earl, Phoenix, Ariz.
I’ve heard this referred to as mini/maxi and also as spiral; if it has an official name, I do not know it! Bridgewinners discusses the subject.
Can you tell me what you consider to be the reasonable constraints for the suitability for a take-out double of an opening bid of a minor-suit? Does it guarantee 4-4 in the majors or might it be as flat as 3-3 in the majors? And what about the minimum length in the unbid minor?
Weight Watcher, New Orleans, La.
These days the purists are losing the battle for the takeout double to have perfect shape. A double of a minor suit should always deliver at least three cards in each major, and be relatively short in the suit doubled (three cards is the exception not the rule). But doubling one diamond with e.g. a 4=4=3=2 shape and a good hand may be the smallest lie. This sort of action has an element of danger — but that doesn’t make it wrong.
When your partner doubles a one-level opening bid, I assume you play jump responses are invitational. But what are double-jumps? And should you modify the meaning of the jump if the next hand redoubles your partner?
Bouncy Castle, Trenton, N.J.
|
As you say, jumps are best played as invitational (say 9-11, ideally with five trumps). After a redouble, the jump should be more shape and fewer high cards – closer to preemptive in nature. And double jumps always sound preemptive in nature to me.
When my partner opens one diamond, how do you feel about trying to improve the contract on a hand without the traditional values for a response? Specifically, I had: ♠ Q-9-7-4-3, ♥ Q-10-7-2, ♦ 3-2, ♣ 9-3. I elected to pass and found my partner struggling in a 4-2 fit while we had a 5-4 spade fit and even some remote chances to make game.
David the Dredger, Janesville, Wis.
For both tactical and strategic reasons I tend to respond lighter to a minor than to a major (the chance of improving the contract or stealing from the opponents are the two main reasons for bidding). Here I think a one spade response is entirely reasonable. You can pass a rebid in diamonds or correct a one no-trump rebid to two hearts to show a weak hand with both majors.
With both sides vulnerable, my partner dealt and opened one spade. My RHO bid three clubs, pre-emptive. I held ♠ Q, ♥ 10-5-2, ♦ K-J-10-9-7-5-3 ♣ 10-2 and passed, believing that three diamonds would indicate a lot more HCP and less support for partner’s suit than I held, and that four diamonds would be an unwise vulnerable pre-empt over a pre-emptive overcall. My partner says I should have gone ahead and bid three diamonds; who is correct please?
Romper Stomper, Torrance, Calif.
You are right, your partner wrong. A bid of three diamonds is a game-force. You must pass here – and note that a jump to four diamonds over three clubs would not be weak with diamonds – it would traditionally be played as a splinter (or perhaps a fitjump) in support of spades.
|
September 19th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 2 Comments
To a philosopher, no circumstance, however trifling, is too minute.
Oliver Goldsmith
| W |
North |
| E-W |
♠ Q 5 2
♥ 8 6 4
♦ A K 7 3
♣ Q 6 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ 7 3
♥ A Q 9 7 5
♦ J 10 9
♣ A 8 4 |
♠ 9 8
♥ J 10 3
♦ Q 8 6 2
♣ J 10 9 5 |
| South |
♠ A K J 10 6 4
♥ K 2
♦ 5 4
♣ K 7 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♥ |
Pass |
Pass |
| 2 ♠* |
Pass |
4 ♠ |
All pass |
*Intermediate in balancing seat
♦J
You might elect to bid diamonds, in which case an invitational jump to three diamonds looks far more appropriate than a pusillanimous response of two diamonds. Or you can bid no-trump. The text books may say that a call of one notrump is constructive; obviously no one is ever dealt a five-count with jack-fifth of spades… I say jump to two no-trump to get your invitational values across best.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 5 2
♥ 8 6 4
♦ A K 7 3
♣ Q 6 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♠ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
September 18th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 11 Comments
Blue color is everlastingly appointed by the Deity to be a source of delight.
John Ruskin
| N |
North |
| Both |
♠ A K 8 7 5
♥ 7 4
♦ A 3
♣ J 8 6 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ 9 4
♥ 8 6 3
♦ 10 9 5
♣ K Q 10 9 3 |
♠ Q J 10 3
♥ A 2
♦ K Q 6 2
♣ 7 5 4 |
| South |
♠ 6 2
♥ K Q J 10 9 5
♦ J 8 7 4
♣ A |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♠ |
Pass |
| 2 ♥ |
Pass |
2 ♠ |
Pass |
| 4 ♥ |
All pass |
|
|
♣K
Players are taught not to rebid five-card suits if a sensible alternative exists. But that stricture does not apply in a two-over-one auction when opener is unsuitable for a call at no-trump. I believe that a rebid at the three-level (three clubs here) would show extra shape or high cards. To my mind, a simple rebid of a decent five-card suit is more descriptive and economical.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A K 8 7 5
♥ 7 4
♦ A 3
♣ J 8 6 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
2 ♦ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
September 17th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 15 Comments
If it walks like a duck, quacks like a duck, looks like a duck, it must be a duck.
Proverb
| S |
North |
| Both |
♠ K J 10 7 4 3
♥ 9 6 2
♦ 7 4
♣ 8 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q 9 5 2
♥ K 8 4
♦ 8 5
♣ Q J 10 2 |
♠ 8
♥ A Q J 7
♦ K Q 10 2
♣ 9 7 6 3 |
| South |
♠ A 6
♥ 10 5 3
♦ A J 9 6 3
♣ A K 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
2 ♥ |
Pass |
| 2 ♠ |
Pass |
Pass |
Dbl. |
| Pass |
3 ♣ |
3 ♠ |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♣Q
This is the sort of hand where knowledge of the vulnerability is critical. Wild horses would not tempt me to act if vulnerable, but if at favorable vulnerability I might even risk a three spade preempt. With neither side vulnerable I would feel obliged to act – you could tempt me to break discipline and open two spades. You’re only young once.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K J 10 7 4 3
♥ 9 6 2
♦ 7 4
♣ 8 4 |
September 16th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
Success is always something that you have to recover from.
Marsha Norman
| S |
North |
| N-S |
♠ K
♥ 10 6 4 3
♦ K J 8
♣ J 8 7 4 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ 10 8 5 4 3
♥ Q 7
♦ 10 6
♣ Q 9 6 3 |
♠ J 7 6 2
♥ J 9 5
♦ A Q 5 3
♣ K 10 |
| South |
♠ A Q 9
♥ A K 8 2
♦ 9 7 4 2
♣ A 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
2 ♣ |
Pass |
| 2 ♥ |
Pass |
3 ♥ |
Pass |
| 4 ♥ |
All pass |
|
|
♠4
Normally one starts from the assumption that all bids in the fourth suit are artificial. This is one of the rare exceptions. Since you have already shown some club length and values at your second turn, the two club call suggests a three-suiter, with short hearts. Your hand could hardly be better now. I could barely live with a three-club call, but I think a bid of four clubs would be closer to the value of the hand.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K
♥ 10 6 4 3
♦ K J 8
♣ J 8 7 4 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
1 ♦ |
Pass |
| 1 ♥ |
Pass |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
2 ♣ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
|
This deal comes from the Junior Europeans a few years ago and demonstrates that it is often dangerous to make predictions about anything at this game. For example: just how solid is a solid suit?
In the more sedate room in the match between Israel and Austria the Israeli South declared three no-trump on a heart lead. He finished up with only the six tricks he had started life with — three hearts and three club tricks, no more. He tried to force an entry to hand but the defenders did not continue playing on hearts and cashed out their diamonds and spades.
Far and away declarer’s best shot on the deal was to do what Andreas Gloyer of Austria did, after concealing his clubs in the auction. He ducked the opening heart lead! Then he could win the second heart, lead a club to dummy and a spade to the jack. If he could persuade the defenders to win and continue hearts, as they trustingly did, he could cash his two remaining heart winners to pitch the two blocking clubs from dummy. Now he could come to nine tricks from the hearts and clubs – so long as the club 10 dropped in two rounds.
But note that the effect of this card not falling in two rounds was, as Gloyer discovered, that when a defender cashed the club 10, it squeezed the dummy in spades and diamonds for down four! How embarrassing for this to happen in a suit where you held nine cards and the top four winners!