October 26th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Monday, October 12th, 2015
You have to learn the rules of the game. And then you have to play better than anyone else.
Albert Einstein
| N |
North |
| None |
♠ K 6 3
♥ —
♦ K J 9 8 7 2
♣ A Q 9 6 |
| West |
East |
♠ A Q 8
♥ 8 5 3 2
♦ A 10 4
♣ J 5 3 |
♠ J 10 5 2
♥ J 4
♦ Q 6 3
♣ K 8 7 4 |
| South |
♠ 9 7 4
♥ A K Q 10 9 7 6
♦ 5
♣ 10 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♦ |
Pass |
| 1 ♥ |
Pass |
2 ♣ |
Pass |
| 4 ♥ |
All pass |
|
|
♠A
It may feel right to attack trump, but your holding is an extremely dangerous one from which to lead. and it is somewhat unlikely that you can lead enough trumps to stop a cross-ruff, if that is what declarer intends. I’d settle for the mundane low club and hope to muddle through the defense on sheer power.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ K J 5
♥ J 9
♦ Q 7 4 2
♣ K 10 8 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♣ |
Pass |
| 1 ♦ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
1 ♥ |
| 2 ♣ |
2 ♥ |
3 ♣ |
3 ♥ |
| All pass |
|
|
|
October 25th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 11 Comments
|
I was dealt ♠ J-2, ♥ A-J-10-6-4, ♦ Q-7-6, ♣ K-7-4, and responded one heart to one diamond. When my partner jumped to two spades, I was afraid to give preference to diamonds in case he passed. Should I have bid two or three notrump, used fourth suit, or even rebid hearts?
Multiple Choice, Hamilton, Ontario
Remember, two spades sets up a game force, so you should not worry about playing partscore here. Rebidding hearts should promise a better suit, and to bid no-trump you would like a more solid club stopper than this. Giving preference to three diamonds is economical and descriptive. More importantly it leaves room for partner to describe his hand, and tell you why he set up a game force.
What is the current expert position on signaling suit-preference on defense? Where does suit-preference rank in terms of signaling count or attitude? And what should I be thinking about when deciding which signal to give?
Self-referential, Wheaton, Ill.
On opening lead I signal attitude unless I am sure my partner should know who has any missing honors in the suit led. Thereafter, the default signal becomes count. It is only when the need to shift is obvious that suit preference kicks in. By contrast, when a suit is played for the second time, I will often give suit preference, unless I believe partner really needs to know count.
I picked up a hand at rubber bridge yesterday, which left me stuck for a bid. I held ♠ 3, ♥ A-9-6, ♦ A-7-6-4, ♣ A-K-7-4-2. I responded two clubs (game forcing) to one spade, and when my partner bid three spades I had no idea how to advance. What would you suggest?
Menace to Society, Naples, Fla.
|
Since partner’s three spade call promises good spades, I would need to make at least one slam-try. My choice would be a jump to five spades to focus on partner’s spades. I need him to bid slam with a one-loser suit. I think he should appreciate that I have at most a small doubleton in spades for this auction, but all the sidecontrols.
How much do I need to rebid one no-trump when I open one of a suit and hear my LHO overcall at the one level, passed back to me? I tried this on a bad 15-count that I had elected to open one no-trump, and was told in no uncertain terms that this was theoretically unacceptable.
Two Stools, Casper, Wyo.
Whether the language used was unparliamentary or not, the idea of a rebid in no-trump facing a silent partner is that it should be 18-19, i.e. more not less than a strong no-trump. With a minimum balanced hand facing a presumably weak partner, let the opponents play in peace and quiet – though you can reopen with a double when short in their suit, of course.
If my partner bids one diamond, do I have to have five hearts to say one heart or am I able to do it with only four? Does one have discretion to bypass a weak major?
Nearly a Novice, Lorain, Ohio
You ask an important question — never be afraid to ask even if you think you should know the answer. One level major-suit responses only guarantee four cards. They may have more of course. Opener raises with four (and sometimes with three and an unbalanced hand). One needs the response to show four-plus cards or one can never find the 4-4 fits with confidence. Bypassing a major is rare, but possible after your RHO doubles a minor.
|
October 24th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 11 Comments
He who does not fear death cares naught for threats.
Pierre Corneille
| S |
North |
| None |
♠ K J 10 9
♥ K 10 7 3
♦ A 3
♣ A Q 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ A 7 2
♥ A Q J 5 4
♦ J 4
♣ 9 6 4 |
♠ Q 8 6 4 3
♥ 8 2
♦ 7
♣ K 10 8 7 5 |
| South |
♠ 5
♥ 9 6
♦ K Q 10 9 8 6 5 2
♣ J 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 4 ♦ |
Pass |
5 ♦ |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♥A
You may think you have a pile of garbage, but I would nonetheless raise to three clubs now. There are two reasons for this: you may keep opponents out of their heart fit, and facing a hand with shape you might make a lot of tricks. (Incidentally, I wouldn’t sit for three no-trump here if my partner makes that call next – this hand looks like it should be played in clubs.)
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 8 6 4 3
♥ 8 2
♦ 7
♣ K 10 8 7 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♦ |
Pass |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
2 ♣ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
October 23rd, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 8 Comments
As far as it’s ideal that you get helped by people, it doesn’t mean they are compelled to make your dreams come true without your efforts.
Israelmore Ayivor
| S |
North |
| Both |
♠ A Q J 6 2
♥ Q 9 6 4
♦ A K
♣ A 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ K 10 9 7
♥ 8 5
♦ 10 9 6
♣ J 9 5 2 |
♠ 5 4 3
♥ J 10 7 3
♦ J 8 7 4 3
♣ Q |
| South |
♠ 8
♥ A K 2
♦ Q 5 2
♣ K 10 8 7 6 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♣ |
Pass |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
| 2 ♣ |
Pass |
2 ♥ |
Pass |
| 3 ♣ |
Pass |
4 ♣ |
Pass |
| 3 ♥ |
Pass |
4 NT |
Pass |
| 5 ♥ |
Pass |
6 ♣ |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♦10
Is this last call natural or a cuebid supporting hearts? Opinions vary – and it is far more important to reach agreement with your partner than with me. I vote for cuebid, but you don’t have to commit yourself – bid four diamonds as a repeat cuebid and see what happens next.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A Q J 6 2
♥ Q 9 6 4
♦ A K
♣ A 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
1 NT |
Pass |
| 3 ♥ |
Pass |
4 ♣ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
October 22nd, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 5 Comments
Lost time is never found again.
Benjamin Franklin
| W |
North |
| N-S |
♠ K 5 3
♥ 10 4 3
♦ A 8 7
♣ A K 10 7 |
| West |
East |
♠ 10 4
♥ A K Q J 9 6 5
♦ 4 2
♣ Q 4 |
♠ 9 8 7 6
♥ 8 7
♦ Q J 9 6
♣ J 9 8 |
| South |
♠ A Q J 2
♥ 2
♦ K 10 5 3
♣ 6 5 3 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
4 ♥ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| 4 ♠ |
All pass |
|
|
♥K
Since two diamonds by your partner would set up a force, three diamonds should specifically be short diamonds (singleton or void). Obviously three no-trump is no longer in the picture as a final contract; with three-card heart support, raise hearts now, and take it from there. You have a superb hand for slam if partner tries to encourage you to cooperate.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K 5 3
♥ 10 4 3
♦ A 8 7
♣ A K 10 7 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♣ |
1 ♦ |
1 ♥ |
Pass |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
3 ♦ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
October 21st, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 2 Comments
Courage and grace are a formidable mixture. The only place to see it is in the bullring.
Marlene Dietrich
| N |
North |
| Both |
♠ J 9 7 3
♥ A J 5 3
♦ A Q 9 3
♣ J |
| West |
East |
♠ A Q 6 2
♥ Q 10 6
♦ K 10 7 2
♣ 6 2 |
♠ 4
♥ K 7 4
♦ 8 6 5
♣ Q 10 9 8 7 3 |
| South |
♠ K 10 8 5
♥ 9 8 2
♦ J 4
♣ A K 5 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♦ |
3 ♣ |
| Dbl. |
Pass |
4 ♣ |
Pass |
| 4 ♠ |
All pass |
|
|
♣6
Opinions differ as to whether one should get involved with a shape-suitable minimum. Bidding is not without risk – you may tip declarer off to how to tackle the red suits, for example, as well as running the risk of going for a number. That said, too dangerous is no excuse. I would double on the grounds that it is safer to bid now than later.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K 10 8 5
♥ 9 8 2
♦ J 4
♣ A K 5 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♦ |
Pass |
1 ♥ |
| ? |
|
|
|
October 20th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 17 Comments
I don’t see it as my role to save or rescue anybody any more than regular people feel the need to rescue each other from sleeping and dreaming.
Jed McKenna
| East-West |
North |
| North |
♠ 8 7 5
♥ A 10 8 6 4
♦ K J 7
♣ A 6 |
| West |
East |
♠ A Q 10 9 4 3
♥ 7 2
♦ 3
♣ Q J 4 3 |
♠ J 6 2
♥ K J 9 3
♦ Q 9 6
♣ 10 7 5 |
| South |
♠ K
♥ Q 5
♦ A 10 8 5 4 2
♣ K 9 8 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♥ |
Pass |
| 2 ♦ |
2 ♠ |
3 ♦ |
Pass |
| 3 ♠ |
Pass |
4 ♣ |
Pass |
| 4 ♥ |
Pass |
5 ♦ |
All pass |
♣Q
In almost every situation where a double is made under the trumps, you are trying to show cards, not play for penalty. I would describe this double as take-out, so I would not expect your partner to play for blood without sure trump tricks. If your partner supports hearts you will raise, and you will correct three clubs to three diamonds. If he bids three diamonds, that will be trickier. Sufficient unto the day…
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 8 7 5
♥ A 10 8 6 4
♦ K J 7
♣ A 6 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♦ |
Pass |
| 1 ♥ |
2 ♠ |
Pass |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
October 19th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 2 Comments
Civilization is like a thin layer of ice upon a deep ocean of chaos and darkness.
Werner Herzog
| S |
North |
| None |
♠ A J 10
♥ 3
♦ K Q 9 8
♣ A J 8 5 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q 4 3 2
♥ K 10 6 5 4
♦ A 7 4
♣ 2 |
♠ K 9 5
♥ J 9 8
♦ J 3
♣ Q 9 7 6 4 |
| South |
♠ 8 7 6
♥ A Q 7 2
♦ 10 6 5 2
♣ K 10 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| Pass |
1 ♥ |
Dbl. |
2 ♥ |
| Pass |
Pass |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| 3 NT |
All pass |
|
|
♥5
The opponents are clearly in a limited auction, and will not have any values to spare. (If they did, they would be playing in game.) The diamond lead is most passive, while a spade lead is most likely both to set up tricks for your side, but it may well cost a trick if it is wrong. I’m going to lead diamonds, on the grounds that I may be able to shift to spades later, if need be.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ J 10 6
♥ Q 8 7 5
♦ 8 6 4
♣ Q J 7 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♣ |
Pass |
1 ♥ |
| Pass |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
2 NT |
| All pass |
|
|
|
October 18th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 9 Comments
|
Please help me to understand a little bit more about inverted minor raises. To start with, are you in favor of them, and should they apply either in competition, or by a passed hand? If you do play them, should the jump raise be weak, or simply less than an invitation – and how many trump should it promise?
Helping Hans, Walnut Creek, Calif.
I like inverted raises; they help constructive bidding by letting good hands start low. They apply by a passed hand; but they are not used in competition. I play a jump raise is weak when non-vulnerable, but invitational to three no-trump facing an 18-19 count if we are vulnerable. A jump raise of a minor will always deliver five, an inverted raise of diamonds may deliver only four diamonds.
Do you always lead from length on a blind auction (such as one notrump – three no-trump) or do you prefer to lead from a sequence in a shorter holding? And what about leading from a major as opposed to a minor?
Opening Fire, Pueblo, Colo.
With values, I tend to lead from a long suit, of five or more cards, be it a major or a minor, unless the action clearly makes that a bad idea. But if I have a broken four-carder and a sensible three-card holding, I may go passive against a blind auction. Additionally, I am not a fan of leading from ace-fourth into a strong hand; but leading from other honor holdings do not bother me as much.
As dealer I passed, holding ♠ 5, ♥ K-10-7-6-2, ♦ A-Q-10-8, ♣ 10-6-4, and heard my partner open one diamond and the next hand overcall one spade. Would you double, or bid hearts, or raise diamonds? I chose to bid two hearts. Now I heard two spades to my left and two no-trump from my partner. When the next hand bid three spades, what would you do now?
Friar John, Carmel, Calif.
For what it is worth, my bid over one spade would be three hearts, since I play fit-jumps by a passed hand. I cannot simply hold hearts or I’d have preempted at my first turn, or would bid two hearts or double now. Over three spades I’d bid four diamonds. I can’t keep quiet about that support any longer.
|
I encountered an unusual problem when my partner opened one heart in third seat and the next hand overcalled one no-trump. I held ♠ 2, ♥ Q-J-9-6-2, ♦ K-Q-6-3, ♣ J-7-4. I jumped trustingly to four hearts, doubled and down one when partner had only a four-card suit and 11 points. But doubling one no-trump would not have worked either. What should I have done?
Too Trusting, Union City, Tenn.
Two hearts would be a gross underbid and three hearts would be preemptive here, so I suggest you add a small systemic wrinkle to your partnership agreements. Use a call of two no-trump in this sequence to be a limit raise in hearts instead of natural or takeout for the minors. This way, you let partner get involved intelligently.
I held ♠ A-J-8-6-4-2, ♥ 6-2, ♦ A-9-8, ♣ Q-4, and heard my partner open one club and rebid two clubs after my one spade response. I jumped to three spades, raised to four, and could not bring it home facing the singleton spade king. My partner suggested that I should bid only two spades. I felt that my hand justified an invitational jump bid. What would you have bid?
Steamroller, Columbia, S.C.
With the spade 10 in addition to your other assets, three spades would be unimpeachable. As it is, you have a marginal opener – so your choice would be the mainstream action, along with comments from an expert panel that this is ‘the least lie’. For the record, if an initial jump to two spades was non-forcing and weak, then without the spade jack you might content yourself with a simple rebid of two spades.
|
October 17th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
Invention, strictly speaking, is little more than a new combination of those images which have been previously gathered and deposited in the memory; nothing can come from nothing.
Sir Joshua Reynolds
| E |
North |
| Both |
♠ A
♥ J 7 5 4 2
♦ K 6 2
♣ 10 9 5 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q J 9 4
♥ A 10 6
♦ Q 9 4 3
♣ 8 4 |
♠ K 10 7 5
♥ K Q 9 8 3
♦ A 10 7
♣ 7 |
| South |
♠ 8 6 3 2
♥ —
♦ J 8 5
♣ A K Q J 6 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
1 ♥ |
| 2 ♣ |
Dbl. |
2 ♥ |
2 ♠ |
| 3 ♣ |
3 ♥ |
5 ♣ |
All pass |
♠Q
In auctions of this sort your partner’s bid of the opponent’s suit on the second round should be natural. I admit that the action is somewhat unexpected, but your partner could be 5-5 in spades and diamonds, with your RHO holding five or six clubs, and four hearts. While you do have fitting honors you don’t have quite enough to raise to three diamonds, so pass.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A
♥ J 7 5 4 2
♦ K 6 2
♣ 10 9 5 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♦ |
1 ♠ |
Dbl. |
| Pass |
1 NT |
2 ♦ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
|
Iconoclasts will tell you rules are meant to be broken. Up to a point, perhaps. The reasons the rules exist is because they tend to have at least an underlying grain of sense. However, applying the rules without pausing for reflection is as dangerous as ignoring the rules altogether.
Let’s look at today’s deal, from a team game. What should West lead? In one room West settled for the low club lead, and declarer guessed extremely well to let it run, judging that West might well have been unhappy underleading a king here. East took his club king and shifted to spades, and the defenders took the ace and pressed on with that suit. Declarer pitched his spade loser on the clubs, and discarded his diamond loser on the club nine as West ruffed in. With the heart jack falling, declarer could claim the rest.
In the other room West was not put off by his awkward spade holding. South’s bidding suggested little outside a strong heart suit, so any missing spade honors were relatively likely to be in dummy, and spades was the most likely suit for East-West to have winners in, either to cash or to establish.
After the spade ace and another spade, declarer was locked in dummy. He elected to play a third spade, and West won and shifted to clubs, setting up his side’s fourth winner in plenty of time. Declarer finessed the queen, and East took his king and knew to shift to diamonds, to cash out for down one.