August 16th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Sunday, August 2nd, 2015
|
I opened one club, and the next hand overcalled one spade. When the next two hands passed, should I have passed too, holding: ♠ 7-4, ♥ K-10-8-4, ♦ A-Q-2, ♣ K-J-4-3? I did have a minimum balanced hand, I thought.
Balancing Act, Fort Walton Beach, Fla.
This is a tough one for intermediate players to understand. But when you play negative doubles, you should always re-open with a double when you are short in the opponents’ suit. Here you would expect partner either to have a minimum hand and no clear action – when I admit you might regret re-opening – or a penalty double of spades, when passing will not prove represent your side’s best result.
Holding: ♠ 9-2, ♥ K-9-6-5-2, ♦ J-2, ♣ K-7-4-3 I heard my partner open one spade and I responded one no-trump. When my partner bid two diamonds I corrected to two spades, missing a 5-4 heart fit (my partner had a 5-4-4-0 shape and was trying to find a fit). Who went wrong here?
Broken Hearted, Briarcliff Manor, N.Y.
Your partner’s responsibility here was to rebid two hearts not two diamonds, to look for the higher scoring contract. The two diamonds call is almost sure to lose any eight-card heart fit (and even, as here, a 5-4 fit). Missing a diamond fit is a ‘minor’ disaster by comparison.
Do you favor opening in third or fourth seat with a four-card major? If you would, how good a suit should you have? What would be the minimum for such an action?
Robbery with Violins, Midland, Mich.
|
Yes, one can make such a call with a minimum, and it can be made on any hand where the quality of the majorsuit is significantly better than the minor, and the hand is only worth one call. For example, I would open ace-queen fourth of spades rather than queen-fourth of clubs in an 11-count, but not in a 14-count, where I plan to bid again if given the chance.
I’m embarrassed to say I don’t really understand what exactly people mean by the term ‘Two over one’? Is it part of Standard American?
Slow Learner, Boca Raton, Fla.
The underlying concept behind ‘Two over one’ is that a two-level response to a one-level opening, if not in competition, sets up a game-forcing auction. Many people play ‘two over one’ is game forcing UNLESS responder repeats his suit. I’m happy to play either style; I think these approaches are about as common as the old-fashioned style where a two-level response does not guarantee a second bid. The former style is becoming close to standard in tournament play.
Holding: ♠ Q-4-3-2, ♥ 6, ♦ K-J-7-2, ♣ A-K-9-6 I opened one club, (do you agree?) and raised a one spade response to two. What is the right way to continue over a bid of three clubs from my partner?
Enigma Machine, Danville, Ill.
The three-club call is forcing. I think I can show the nature of my hand precisely by jumping to four hearts. Having limited my hand by my simple raise at my previous turn, my jump in a new suit is an unusual variety of splinter-bid in support of spades. We may not be able to make slam, but my partner should envisage a hand of this approximate shape and strength, and make his own arrangements.
|
August 15th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 2 Comments
When a man is tired of London, he is tired of life.
Samuel Johnson
| N |
North |
| None |
♠ A 5 4
♥ Q
♦ K 7 4
♣ Q J 8 7 4 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ J 9 7
♥ 9 4
♦ Q 6 5
♣ A K 6 5 2 |
♠ Q 10 8 3
♥ K J 10 6 5 2
♦ 10
♣ 10 9 |
| South |
♠ K 6 2
♥ A 8 7 3
♦ A J 9 8 3 2
♣ — |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♣ |
1 ♥ |
| 2 ♦ |
Pass |
3 ♦ |
Pass |
| 3 ♥ |
Pass |
3 ♠ |
Pass |
| 6 ♦ |
All pass |
|
|
♣K
This auction is traditionally played as forcing – though whether you play change of suit forcing after a one-level overcall is down to partnership agreement. You cannot raise hearts, so the question is whether to rebid two no-trump or repeat the clubs. You have so few tricks I prefer a three-club rebid; but it is close.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A 5 4
♥ Q
♦ K 7 4
♣ Q J 8 7 4 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
1 ♦ |
| 2 ♣ |
Pass |
2 ♥ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
August 14th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 5 Comments
Life doesn’t offer charity, it offers chance.
Amit Kalantri
| S |
North |
| N-S |
♠ Q J 10 5
♥ 5 4
♦ A K J
♣ J 7 3 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ 9 6 4 2
♥ J
♦ Q 10 9 8 3
♣ Q 10 8 |
♠ 8 7 3
♥ K 8 3 2
♦ 7 6 5 2
♣ K 6 |
| South |
♠ A K
♥ A Q 10 9 7 6
♦ 4
♣ A 9 5 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♥ |
Pass |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
| 2 ♣ |
Pass |
2 ♦ |
Pass |
| 3 ♥ |
Pass |
4 ♥ |
Pass |
| 6 ♥ |
All pass |
|
|
♦10
When you have a 12-count with two four-card suits, the question is not whether to open the bidding, but with what to open. I can imagine 12-counts I would pass but this is not one of them. Yes opening one club is hardly lead-directing, and in third seat I would understand bidding one diamond – or even one spade. But in first seat it looks normal to open one club and bid the spades the next time round.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ Q J 10 5
♥ 5 4
♦ A K J
♣ J 5 3 2 |
August 13th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 2 Comments
And she is the reader who browses the shelf and looks for new worlds but finds herself.
Laura Salas
| N |
North |
| Both |
♠ K J 10
♥ K Q J 4
♦ A 8
♣ A J 6 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ 9 8 5 4 2
♥ 9 7 3
♦ 10 9 5 2
♣ 9 |
♠ 7 6 3
♥ 6
♦ K J 6 4
♣ Q 8 7 4 2 |
| South |
♠ A Q
♥ A 10 8 5 2
♦ Q 7 3
♣ K 10 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♣ |
Pass |
| 1 ♥ |
Pass |
4 ♥ |
Pass |
| 4 ♠ |
Pass |
4 NT |
Pass |
| 5 ♥* |
Pass |
5 NT |
Pass |
| 6 ♣** |
Pass |
6 ♦ |
Pass |
| 7 ♥ |
All pass |
|
|
*Two of five key cards, no trump queen
**Club king
♠9
You have a spectacular hand for hearts, too good simply to raise to four hearts. Bid four clubs as an advance cuebid for hearts (this can’t be a club single-suiter given your previous call so it must be in support of hearts). With a good hand for spades you would bid three spades over three hearts.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K J 10
♥ K Q J 4
♦ A 8
♣ A J 6 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♣ |
Pass |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
| 2 NT |
Pass |
3 ♥ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
August 12th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 10 Comments
All seemed well pleased, all seemed but were not all.
John Milton
| N |
North |
| E-W |
♠ A J 3
♥ 7 6 4 3
♦ A K Q J
♣ K 10 |
| West |
East |
♠ 10 8 5 4 2
♥ A Q 9
♦ 10 8
♣ 7 5 4 |
♠ Q 9 6
♥ 8 5 2
♦ 6 4 2
♣ A 8 6 2 |
| South |
♠ K 7
♥ K J 10
♦ 9 7 5 3
♣ Q J 9 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♦ |
Pass |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
2 NT |
Pass |
| 3 NT |
All pass |
|
|
♠4
It might be right to pass and hope to beat this contract. But that seems unnecessarily defeatist. I would double again, hoping that even if partner is weak, we might still find him with as little as five cards in diamonds or spades (or even in hearts!) in which case we might well come home with a partscore.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A J 3
♥ 7 6 4 3
♦ A K Q J
♣ K 10 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
Pass |
1 ♣ |
| Dbl. |
1 ♥ |
Pass |
2 ♣ |
| ? |
|
|
|
August 11th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Tuesday, July 28th, 2015
My name is Might-have-been: I am also called No-more, Too-late, Farewell.
Dante Gabriel Rossetti
| E |
North |
| E-W |
♠ 9 4
♥ A Q 2
♦ K J 5 3 2
♣ 10 5 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ A K 8 7 2
♥ 9
♦ A 10 9 4
♣ K 8 7 |
♠ Q J 5 3
♥ 10 6 5
♦ 7 6
♣ J 9 6 4 |
| South |
♠ 10 6
♥ K J 8 7 4 3
♦ Q 8
♣ A Q 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
Pass |
| 1 ♥ |
1 ♠ |
2 ♠ |
3 ♠ |
| 4 ♥ |
All pass |
|
|
♠K
This is a very tricky problem especially at matchpoints, where finding the highest scoring partscore is as important as simply going plus. I can understand passing at teams since all your cards look to be lying badly. At pairs maybe two spades is reasonable. I’m not a fan of a two no-trump call here. I have no tricks for my partner.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 9 4
♥ A Q 2
♦ K J 5 3 2
♣ 10 5 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♦ |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
2 ♣ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
August 10th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
Believe me, wise men don’t say ‘I shall live to do that’, Tomorrow, life’s too late; live today.
Martial
| E |
North |
| E-W |
♠ 9 8 4
♥ 8
♦ K 8 7 6
♣ K Q J 10 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ 7 2
♥ Q J 9 4 2
♦ 9 4
♣ 9 6 4 3 |
♠ A 3
♥ A 10 7 6 5
♦ Q J 10 3
♣ A 7 |
| South |
♠ K Q J 10 6 5
♥ K 3
♦ A 5 2
♣ 8 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
1 ♥ |
| 1 ♠ |
3 ♥* |
3 ♠ |
Pass |
| 4 ♠ |
All pass |
|
|
*Preemptive
♥Q
It is easy to see that any of the four suits might work here, but my instincts are to lead up to declarer’s weakness, in other word to try to avoid giving away a trick. Either a diamond or a spade might work but I think that while a spade lead might clear up a guess, it is also the suit most likely either to be passive or to set up a winner for partner. So I would lead the spade three.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ 3 2
♥ A 10 6 4
♦ J 9 4 2
♣ K 9 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♦ |
Pass |
1 ♥ |
| Pass |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
1 NT |
| All pass |
|
|
|
August 9th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 12 Comments
|
Holding: ♠ K-10-4, ♥ K-10-6, ♦ J-3-2, ♣ A-Q-9-2 you see your partner open one club and the next hand bid one heart. Should you head directly to the most likely goal of three no-trump or take a slow route by cuebidding and finding out what your partner has?
Roger Rabbit, Pittsburgh, Pa.
Since you don’t have a guaranteed second heart stop, maybe the right route here is to cuebid two hearts, showing a club raise, then follow up a with a call of three no-trump. This indicates a little more doubt as to the final contract, plus it shows your support. This way you get partner involved in the final decision.
Could you clarify a point of rubber bridge scoring? Is there a one hundred point bonus for a part score, or is it 50 points for the part score? Would you kindly verify the correct ruling?
Number Cruncher, Bristol, Va.
There are two issues here — let us make sure we are not confusing apples and oranges. Playing Duplicate, the bonus for a part score is 50 points. At Chicago or in an unfinished rubber the partscore on the last hand is worth 100 rather 50 points. There is no partscore bonus in a finished rubber.
I always look for your column for the good quotes, even though I don’t know how to play bridge. I liked “In small proportions we just beauties see; And in short measures, life may perfect be.” But it’s Ben Jonson, not Johnson.
By the Book, Springfield, Mass.
|
Mea culpa, mea maxima culpa. Even three ‘Hail Mary’s won’t suffice. Could I blame my editors? Probably not! (Note: Online, the column in question has been changed.) I’m a bridge writer, not an intellectual. But I’m shocked (seriously) that more people have picked up on this than my typical bridge error…
I have seen the suggestion that there has been a change at the top in US bridge in terms of younger players rising up the tree. Is that true – or is there some small indication to that effect?
Kid Stuff, Orlando, Fla.
The US had a team of world-beating juniors 12 years ago, most of whom are in their late 30’s now. Many of them have starred in recent US International teams, so I’d say the future is brighter now than it has been for a decade or two. Whether it will translate into world titles remains to be seen.
Facing a strong no-trump, if you hold: ♠ 10-3, ♥ J-9-2, ♣ K-J-9-2, ♣ K-10-8-3, would you pass, invite game, or bid three no-trump?
Range Finder, Carmel, Calif.
One thing I would not want to do is to invite game via Stayman, which would give the opponents far too much information on our way to our final contract. If I had a simple raise to two no-trump available as invitational, I might make it at teams, if vulnerable. But at pairs I pass and hope to go plus.
|
August 8th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 9 Comments
Ah beautiful passionate body That never has ached with a heart.
Algernon Swinburne
| W |
North |
| N-S |
♠ Q 5 2
♥ Q J 10 6
♦ 10 5
♣ Q 10 7 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ 9 4
♥ K 9 7 3
♦ Q 9 6 4 2
♣ K 9 |
♠ K J 8 7
♥ 8 4
♦ 8 7
♣ A 6 5 3 2 |
| South |
♠ A 10 6 3
♥ A 5 2
♦ A K J 3
♣ J 8 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
Pass |
Pass |
| 1 ♣* |
1 ♦ |
Dbl.** |
Pass |
| 2 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
*Two-plus clubs
**Hearts
♦4
It feels right to compete on a hand like this, where your values lie outside diamonds, and your trump spots are so good. While clubs rates to be your best fit, I’d simply compete to two hearts, knowing partner is guaranteed to have at least three hearts. You may well be able to cope with a force by ruffing in partner’s hand.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 5 2
♥ Q J 10 6
♦ 10 5
♣ Q 10 7 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♦ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| 1 ♥ |
2 ♦ |
Pass |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
August 7th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
I am a man more sinned against than sinning.
William Shakespeare
| S |
North |
| N-S |
♠ 4
♥ J 10 4
♦ J 9 7 5
♣ A K Q 6 5 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q 10 8 7 5
♥ A 9 6
♦ Q 6 4 2
♣ 10 |
♠ A 6 3
♥ 8 7 5
♦ K 8 3
♣ J 9 7 3 |
| South |
♠ K J 9 2
♥ K Q 3 2
♦ A 10
♣ 8 4 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♣* |
Pass |
2 ♣ |
Pass |
| 2 NT** |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
*Two-plus cards
**12-14 balanced, both majors stopped
♠7
A penalty pass might work well – but it is an action I am very reluctant to take without trump tricks. A simple jump in clubs is certainly possible, but another possible way to go would be to bid four no-trump, to show the minors. Beware: some play that as natural, and indeed I play a jump to four no-trump as natural over partner’s double of a minor-suit preempt, though not of a major.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 4
♥ J 10 4
♦ J 9 7 5
♣ A K Q 6 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
3 ♥ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
|
Today’s deal comes from the rubber bridge table in London, and was reported by Brian Jackson, a player who thought he had seen it all. He had led a top club against six diamonds, being more hurt than surprised to see declarer ruff it. South now cashed the heart ace and trumped a heart. He then ruffed another club and another heart (Jackson discarding a club). This was followed by the spade king and ace, then a club ruff and another heart ruff, Jackson discarding a spade.
In the four-card ending declarer had a losing spade in each hand, and three clubs in dummy, and A-J-9 of trumps in hand. When declarer played a club from the dummy, East (who had two hearts and a spade as well as his trump 10 left) ruffed in, hoping to promote a trump trick for West. However, South overruffed as West followed suit, then exited with a spade.
In the three-card ending West had to ruff and was endplayed in trumps. Contract made. But had East discarded a spade instead on the previous trick, he could have overruffed his partner on the spade exit. Now the defenders would have come to two tricks.
However, it was my reporter who apologized to his partner. For when declarer played the fourth heart from his hand in the five-card ending, West should have ruffed in front of the dummy. Now in the ending he has one fewer trump and an additional spade, so would be able to discard, rather than ruff in, at trick 11, and thus escape the endplay.