October 12th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
It is life near the bone where it is sweetest.
Henry Thoreau
| E |
North |
| E-W |
♠ 10 8 7
♥ Q J 6 3
♦ 7 5 4
♣ A Q 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ K Q J 2
♥ 8
♦ K 10 9
♣ K 9 7 3 2 |
♠ A 6 3
♥ 9 5 2
♦ J 8 3
♣ J 10 6 5 |
| South |
♠ 9 5 4
♥ A K 10 7 4
♦ A Q 6 2
♣ 8 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
Pass |
| 1 ♥ |
Dbl. |
2 NT* |
Pass |
| 3 ♦ |
Pass |
3 ♥ |
All pass |
*Jordan – a raise to at least three hearts
♠K
Neither a trump nor a diamond lead looks at all attractive, so the choice comes down to a club or a heart – and again we are looking at the least of evils. There is not much to go on here, but if I am going to lead a heart I might choose the seven not the four. If dummy hits deck with the ace-king, maybe I can persuade declarer not to finesse.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 7 4
♥ Q 7 4
♦ A Q 7 6
♣ K 7 6 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♦ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
2 ♠ |
| All pass |
|
|
|
October 11th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 2 Comments
|
Several years ago I saw a suggestion from you that it may be right to open in first or second seat on a balanced hand with 11 points, consisting of two aces and a king. I have been doing so ever since – admittedly with mixed results. Could you please comment on whether I understood you right, or whether there are other factors to consider.
Stepping Out, Lakeland, Fla.
Opening a balanced 11-count is not mandatory even with great controls, though I might open for the lead with ace-kingfourth in a minor. With any real distributional shape in the hand, I believe 2½ honor tricks constitute a valid opening bid. Non-vulnerable, you want to get your blow in first.
I find the question of whether to advance facing an overcall especially hard. For example, holding ♠ 9-2, ♥ Q-7-6-2, ♦ J-2, ♣ A-Q-7-4-3 should you keep the action open in the fourth seat after hearing one diamond to your left, and one spade from partner, when your RHO passes? If so, what would you bid?
Lying Low, Kingston, Ontario
I think this hand has just too much to pass here. Responding two clubs may get partner off to the right lead if you end up defending, and you can surely stand a retreat to spades from your partner. I do not like the idea of raising with this particular spade holding, and the diamond stopper is too feeble for a call at no-trump.
What is a weak no-trump, and how can a bridge player tell if a bidder is opening with a weak or a strong no-trump?
Square Basher, Selma, Ala.
One can play weak, or 12-14 no-trump “instead of” a strong notrump not “as well as”. Some people do play weak no-trump when non-vulnerable, and strong when vulnerable, but one cannot play both at the same time. In duplicate it is customary to announce the range of your partner’s no-trump call each time it is opened — so it should not come as a surprise to the opponents.
|
We can’t believe we disagree on such a simple sequence after playing 2/1 for 14 years, but we need advice regarding a response of two clubs to one diamond. Has responder denied a major? Should opener always show a major at his second turn? And should opener rebid diamonds if he can?
John and Dee, Salinas, Calif.
There is no ‘right’ answer. My personal preference is for opener to rebid no-trump when balanced, with or without a major, to use calls in a major as natural, guaranteeing long diamonds and some extras, and to raise with four (occasionally three) trumps. A rebid in diamonds shows at least five and an unbalanced hand.
When should you try to find partner’s suit, rather than leading your own, against no-trump? Suppose the bidding has gone one notrump, three no-trumps and you have to lead from: ♠ 7, ♥ 10-9-7-4-3, ♦ Q-8-7, ♣ 9-8-6-2. Since you have little chance to both set up and cash out your anemic heart suit, does it make sense to lead a spade, since partner is likely to have five or more?
Unselfish, Macon, Ga.
Leading short/weak suits with bad hands against notrump is a reasonable policy. But leading a singleton seems wrong, since if this would set the hand, partner might have doubled to get me to lead my short suit. With a 2-4-4-3 Yarborough, a spade is certainly not silly. But on your example hand I’d guess to lead hearts, I think.
|
October 10th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Saturday, September 26th, 2015
Creativity is not intelligence, it is the ability to do what you did not know through the use of what you know.
Michael Bassey Johnson
| S |
North |
| E-W |
♠ J 6 4 3
♥ 5
♦ Q 10 6
♣ J 8 6 3 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ 10 9 8
♥ 10 2
♦ 9 8 2
♣ A Q 9 7 4 |
♠ 5 2
♥ J 9 7 6
♦ K J 7 4
♣ K 10 5 |
| South |
♠ A K Q 7
♥ A K Q 8 4 3
♦ A 5 3
♣ — |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 2 ♣ |
Pass |
2 ♦ |
Pass |
| 2 ♥ |
Pass |
2 NT |
Pass |
| 3 ♠ |
Pass |
4 ♠ |
Pass |
| 6 ♠ |
All pass |
|
|
♠10
My answer may raise eyebrows, but I respond light to minor–suit openers, so I’d bid one spade here. I am happy to try to keep the opponents out by simulating more values than I hold. Yes, partner may overdo things; but the usual cliché about omelets and eggs applies here. I’d pass facing an opening bid in any other seat; as soon as one opponent has passed, the need to keep the enemy out declines.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ J 6 4 3
♥ 5
♦ Q 10 6
♣ J 8 6 3 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♦ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
October 9th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
The bad end happily, the good unluckily. That is what tragedy means.
Tom Stoppard
| E |
North |
| Both |
♠ A 8 5
♥ A Q 8 6
♦ A
♣ K Q 8 7 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q 7 3 2
♥ K J 3
♦ 4
♣ 10 6 5 3 2 |
♠ K 9 6
♥ 10 7 4
♦ Q 6 5 3
♣ A J 9 |
| South |
♠ J 10 4
♥ 9 5 2
♦ K J 10 9 8 7 2
♣ — |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
Pass |
| 3 ♦ |
Pass |
5 ♦ |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♥3
Responder’s jump should be played as a splinter – a singleton in support of the last bid suit. So here responder should have short spades and heart support. You are never going to give up short of slam, so it looks simple enough to ask for aces (using keycard to check out the trump king if you play that). It is a good rule that almost all unnecessary jumps are assumed to be shortness, agreeing the last-bid suit.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A 8 5
♥ A Q 8 6
♦ A
♣ K Q 8 7 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♣ |
Pass |
1 ♦ |
Pass |
| 2 ♥ |
Pass |
3 ♠ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
October 8th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
Arm the obdured breast With stubborn patience as with triple steel.
John Milton
| South |
North |
| East-West |
♠ A 6 4
♥ 8 6 3
♦ J 9 7 6 2
♣ Q J |
| West |
East |
♠ J 9 7 2
♥ J 10 9 5
♦ K 8 3
♣ 7 5 |
♠ Q 10 5
♥ —
♦ Q 10 4
♣ A K 9 8 6 3 2 |
| South |
♠ K 8 3
♥ A K Q 7 4 2
♦ A 5
♣ 10 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♥ |
Pass |
2 ♥ |
3 ♣ |
| 4 ♥ |
All pass |
|
|
♣7
Once partner passes your opening call, disappointing as that may seem, your chances of making game here are virtually nil (yes there are hands, but he won’t have one of them, trust me). So rather than trying for game and getting too high, just rebid two hearts, which already shows extras, when facing a known weak hand.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K 8 3
♥ A K Q 7 4 2
♦ A 5
♣ 10 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♥ |
Pass |
Pass |
2 ♣ |
| ? |
|
|
|
October 7th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 13 Comments
There is always a pleasure in unravelling a mystery, in catching at the gossamer clue which will guide to certainty.
Elizabeth Gaskell
| N |
North |
| None |
♠ Q 5
♥ 10 9 4 3 2
♦ 7 3 2
♣ 9 8 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ K 10 9 8 4 2
♥ J 7 5
♦ K
♣ K Q 5 |
♠ 7 3
♥ A K 8 6
♦ 9 6 4
♣ J 10 7 4 |
| South |
♠ A J 6
♥ Q
♦ A Q J 10 8 5
♣ A 6 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
Pass |
Pass |
| 1 ♣ * |
2 ♠ |
Pass |
Pass |
| 3 ♦ |
All pass |
|
|
*Strong, 16+
♥5
Did you pass, assuming partner wanted to defend? If so, write out 100 times “I will not pass my partner’s take-out double”. Once a player doubles for take-out, he can’t convert the meaning of a second low-level double to penalties. The second double is take-out again, showing extras. Repeat your hearts as your weakest option (unless you play the cheapest call to be a second negative here).
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 5
♥ 10 9 4 3 2
♦ 7 3 2
♣ 9 8 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♣ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| 1 ♥ |
2 ♣ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
October 6th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 3 Comments
What would life be without arithmetic, but a scene of horrors?
Tobias Smollett
| S |
North |
| N-S |
♠ 9 4
♥ Q J 9 6 4
♦ Q 8
♣ K J 5 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q J 10 3 2
♥ 5 3
♦ A 9 5
♣ 10 9 3 |
♠ K 7 6 5
♥ 8 2
♦ K 7 6 3
♣ Q 8 7 |
| South |
♠ A 8
♥ A K 10 7
♦ J 10 4 2
♣ A 6 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
2 ♦ |
Pass |
| 3 ♥ |
Pass |
4 ♥ |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♠Q
The question is whether to correct to two hearts when partner has suggested a balanced hand. The 5-4 shape (and shortage in the major partner is unlikely to have length in) makes a two heart call reasonable. I wouldn’t hesitate to make that call if my heart nine were the 10. Now, even facing two small hearts I would have some guarantees that the heart fit would be relatively solid.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 9 4
♥ Q J 9 6 4
♦ Q 8
♣ K J 5 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| Pass |
Pass |
1 ♦ |
Pass |
| 1 ♥ |
Pass |
1 NT |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
October 5th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 2 Comments
Prosperity doth best discover vice, but adversity doth best discover virtue.
Francis Bacon
| S |
North |
| E-W |
♠ A 10 7
♥ A Q J 2
♦ 3 2
♣ A Q J 10 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q 6 3
♥ 10
♦ 9 8 7 6 5
♣ 8 6 5 4 |
♠ J 5 2
♥ 8 7
♦ K Q J 10
♣ K 9 3 2 |
| South |
♠ K 9 8 4
♥ K 9 6 5 4 3
♦ A 4
♣ 7 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♥ |
Pass |
2 NT* |
Pass |
| 3 ♣** |
Pass |
3 ♠ |
Pass |
| 4 ♦ |
Pass |
4 NT |
Pass |
| 5 ♥ |
Pass |
5 NT |
Pass |
| 6 ♥ |
All pass |
|
|
*Jacoby; a game-forcing heart raise
**Shortage
♦9
Declarer sounds as if he has at least five clubs, together with three or four spades to a top honor. To kill spade ruffs in dummy, a trump lead feels right. You are not especially worried about declarer setting up and running the hearts, but preventing the spade ruffs cannot wait.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ A 7 4
♥ J 10 8 4
♦ 5 3 2
♣ J 7 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
Pass |
| Pass |
1 ♥ |
1 ♠ |
1 NT |
| 2 ♠ |
Pass |
Pass |
3 ♣ |
| All pass |
|
|
|
October 4th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 13 Comments
|
Holding ♠ J-7-6, ♥ Q-10, ♦ A-J-8-7-2, ♣ K-4-3 would you overcall one diamond over one club? Would the vulnerability or form of scoring matter? If you would not act, how much more would you need to bid?
Through the Rye, Wausau, Wis.
I tend to overcall freely at the one-level with decent suits. Yes the diamond spots are not impressive, but the two honors in the suit encourage me to act over one club at any form of scoring or vulnerability. Note that this applies to a one-level action only. By contrast I would never overcall two diamonds over a major-suit opening at any form of scoring or vulnerability.
Does an unopposed sequence such as one diamond – one heart – two diamonds – two spades guarantee either four spades, or five hearts? Would you call it a reverse — or if not, what precisely does it show?
Shape Shifter, Tampa, Fla.
The two spade call is essentially natural (but may be only a three-carder at a pinch). Responder may pass a minimum rebid by opener at his third turn, such as three diamonds, and maybe even two no-trump. However, opener cannot let responder out below game. If responder has real extra shape, he can show it by rebidding spades next.
Recently, my LHO opened one club, and RHO bid one diamond. Holding ♠ A-J-8-7-6, ♠ Q-10-9-7-2, ♦ K, ♣ 6-5, I ventured two notrump to show both majors. LHO passed, and my partner drove me to game with four hearts and a nine-count. With the heart finesse working, game required my partner to find the spade queen (and he managed that too). The result was fine, but did I do too much?
Lucky Luke, Newport News, Va.
|
Your choice of the unusual two no-trump sounds right to me. You are, after all, 5-5 with all your values mainly in your long suits. Your partner played you for a fraction more than you had, but game was playable (and the opponents might have had a good contract in clubs but you kept them out!). I like both of your choices. As you indicated, you were a little aggressive and a little lucky. That isn’t yet a federal crime.
Can you explain the term Crawling Stayman to me please? Does it apply to an auction where the Stayman bidder follows up with two spades?
Gold Miner, Grand Forks, N.D.
Classical Crawling Stayman uses the sequence of Stayman followed by two hearts to show a weak hand with no game interest and both majors. Opener passes, or corrects two hearts to two spades with 3-2 in the majors. Stayman followed by two spades is more controversial. I like to use the sequence as a mild invitation with five spades in an unbalanced hand, but all sorts of alternative treatments, such as weak with five spades and four hearts, make sense too.
With: ♠ K-10-2, ♥ A-Q-6-4-3, ♦ 10, ♣ A-Q-7-4 I opened one heart, and heard a one spade overcall. My partner raised to two hearts and my RHO joined in with three diamonds. Should I have bid game, or just competed to three hearts? That last call would not be an invitation, would it?
Climbing High, Woodland Hills, Calif.
When the opponents compete to the maximum level (so you have no space for a game try) use double as a game-try, called a Maximal Double. Then three hearts becomes purely competitive, barring partner from re-raising. However, when the opponents have not agreed a fit (as here) it may be right to play double as defensive. If three diamonds guaranteed a spade fit, double would be maximal.
|
October 3rd, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
Look on every exit as being an entrance somewhere else.
Tom Stoppard
| N |
North |
| Both |
♠ A Q J 8 7 3
♥ A J
♦ A 7 4
♣ K 8 |
| West |
East |
♠ 6
♥ Q 7 6 2
♦ J 6 5
♣ J 10 7 6 5 |
♠ K 10 9 5 4
♥ 10 9 8 5 3
♦ Q 9
♣ Q |
| South |
♠ 2
♥ K 4
♦ K 10 8 3 2
♣ A 9 4 3 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♠ |
Pass |
| 2 ♦ |
Pass |
2 NT |
Pass |
| 3 ♣ |
Pass |
3 ♦ |
Pass |
| 4 ♣ |
Pass |
4 ♥ |
Pass |
| 5 ♦ |
Pass |
6 ♦ |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♠6
Clearly, you should not pass here; but you could sensibly bid either two diamonds, planning to give up over a spade rebid from your partner, or you could respond one no-trump. The latter seems to get you to a 5-4 minor fit whenever one is available, since it lets partner bid his second suit more easily, so I would opt for that.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 2
♥ K 4
♦ K 10 8 3 2
♣ A 9 4 3 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
Pass |
| Pass |
1 ♥ |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
|
Defending to three hearts, West cashes two top spades then plays a spade to his partner’s ace. East shifts to a trump, won by declarer in dummy, who crosses to hand with a trump, to find the 3-1 break.
Now declarer needs to protect against West having both minor-suit kings. He takes the club finesse, cashes the club ace, pitching a diamond, and ruffs a club, then draws the outstanding trumps by crossing to dummy with a trump.
At this point nine cards have been played and declarer is down to three diamonds and a trump in each hand. Meanwhile both defenders still have their original diamond holding and one club.
Since the black suits have been eliminated, the defenders now have to be very careful when declarer leads a low diamond from dummy. If East plays low (or even if he puts in the eight) declarer follows with his small diamond. West must win the trick and then either concede a ruff and discard or lead away from his diamond king into declarer’s diamond acequeen; either way, South has nine tricks.
The defense fares better if East covers the diamond four with the jack. South plays the queen and West will win the king; now his remaining diamond spots will be good for a trick.
Note that even had trumps been 2-2, the entry position would have been very awkward to strip out the clubs. On the auction, the club finesse may be the right play, even when trumps divide evenly.
And yes, a diamond shift at trick four would have been fatal.