September 26th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 8 Comments
Without leaps of imagination or dreaming, we lose the excitement of possibilities. Dreaming, after all is a form of planning.
Gloria Steinem
| N |
North |
| None |
♠ A 7
♥ K Q J 6
♦ K Q 10 4
♣ A K 7 |
| West |
East |
♠ 3
♥ 10 9 7 4
♦ J 9 8 3
♣ J 6 4 2 |
♠ K Q J 10 9 8 6
♥ 8
♦ 7 6
♣ Q 10 5 |
| South |
♠ 5 4 2
♥ A 5 3 2
♦ A 5 2
♣ 9 8 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
2 ♣ |
2 ♠ |
| Pass |
Pass |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| 3 ♠ |
Pass |
4 ♦ |
Pass |
| 5 ♥ |
Pass |
6 ♥ |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♠3
Were you tempted to raise spades, or to respond one no-trump? When partner bids two suits and you have decent support for the first-bid suit, simply give preference to that suit. Yes, diamonds scores less well than making a spade or notrump contract. But the last time I checked, it was better to go plus than minus. Even a partial club stopper might tempt me to settle for a call of one no-trump.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 5 4 2
♥ A 5 3 2
♦ A 5 2
♣ 9 8 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♦ |
Pass |
| 1 ♥ |
Pass |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
September 25th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 3 Comments
Among all forms of mistake, prophecy is the most gratuitous.
George Eliot
| N |
North |
| N-S |
♠ Q 7 5 2
♥ 8
♦ K J 10 5 2
♣ A K Q |
| West |
East |
♠ A K 9 6
♥ 10 6 5 4 2
♦ 7 4 3
♣ 6 |
♠ 10 8 4
♥ Q 9 3
♦ A Q 9 6
♣ 10 7 3 |
| South |
♠ J 3
♥ A K J 7
♦ 8
♣ J 9 8 5 4 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♦ |
Pass |
| 1 ♥ |
Pass |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
| 2 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♥4
Your partner has suggested a slam, and denied a club control in so doing. When you cooperate by bidding four hearts you should promise a club control (which you have – in spades, so to speak) as well as suggesting suitability for slam. While you certainly would not make a try above the game level, you should allow partner to investigate for slam if he wants.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 7 5 2
♥ 8
♦ K J 10 5 2
♣ A K Q |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♦ |
Pass |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
| 3 ♠ |
Pass |
4 ♦ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
September 24th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
He shall come to judge the quick and the dead.
Book of Common Prayer
| W |
North |
| Both |
♠ A K Q 5
♥ K Q 4
♦ 8 4
♣ A Q 3 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ 8 2
♥ A 10 8
♦ K 7 6
♣ K J 6 5 4 |
♠ J 10 6 4
♥ 9 7 6 5 2
♦ Q 3
♣ 8 7 |
| South |
♠ 9 7 3
♥ J 3
♦ A J 10 9 5 2
♣ 10 9 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 NT* |
Dbl. |
2 ♣ |
| Pass |
Pass |
Dbl. |
2 ♥ |
| Pass |
Pass |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| 2 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
*11 – 14
♠8
The three diamond call is a transfer to hearts, a suit you fit well. Should you do more than bid three hearts as requested? No indeed. Imagine partner with a hand that would pass three hearts (jack-fifth of hearts and the diamond queen, say). You might well be struggling to make even nine tricks. If partner had transferred to spades, I would do more – the fourth trump and ruffing value might be critical.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A K Q 5
♥ K Q 4
♦ 8 4
♣ A Q 3 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 2 NT |
Pass |
3 ♦ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
September 23rd, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 8 Comments
People who don’t take risks generally make about two big mistakes a year. People who do take risks generally make about two big mistakes a year.
Peter Drucker
| E |
North |
| E-W |
♠ 10 9
♥ A K J 4
♦ 10 7 4 2
♣ K 9 5 |
| West |
East |
♠ 8 7 6
♥ Q 8 7 6 5
♦ K J 3
♣ J 3 |
♠ A 3
♥ 9 3
♦ 9 8 5
♣ A Q 10 8 7 4 |
| South |
♠ K Q J 5 4 2
♥ 10 2
♦ A Q 6
♣ 6 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
Pass |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
1 NT |
2 ♣ |
| 2 ♠ |
Pass |
3 ♠ |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♣J
Your partner’s three heart call asks you to describe your hand in terms of spade suit, club fit or diamond stopper. It shows hearts rather than asking about the suit. With a solid diamond stopper bid three no-trump now. You could persuade me that I hadn’t shown the full quality of my spades yet. I agree; but I’d rather head for no-trump first and hope that we can back into spades later. No-trump can’t wait.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K Q J 5 4 2
♥ 10 2
♦ A Q 6
♣ 6 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
2 ♣ |
Pass |
| 2 ♠ |
Pass |
3 ♥ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
September 22nd, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 10 Comments
There are two tragedies in life. One is not to get your heart’s desire. The other is to get it.
G. B. Shaw
| S |
North |
| E-W |
♠ J 10 7
♥ K J 9
♦ A J 3
♣ 7 5 4 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ 9 6 4 3
♥ —
♦ 9 7 6 2
♣ Q J 10 8 6 |
♠ 8 5 2
♥ Q 10 8 4
♦ 10 8 5
♣ K 9 3 |
| South |
♠ A K Q
♥ A 7 6 5 3 2
♦ K Q 4
♣ A |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 2 ♣ |
Pass |
2 ♦ |
Pass |
| 2 ♥ |
Pass |
3 ♥ |
Pass |
| 3 NT* |
Pass |
6 ♥ |
All pass |
*Mild slam try for hearts
♣Q
There are two directions you might go here; you might raise clubs, or bid notrump. I prefer the latter, and though I only have a 10-count, I’m optimistically driving to three notrump, for two reasons. The first is that my four small clubs will help to solidify partner’s suit. The second is that I want to keep the opponents out – they have a lot of major-suit cards after all. A call of two no-trump is also just fine.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ J 10 7
♥ K J 9
♦ A J 3
♣ 7 5 4 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| Pass |
1 ♦ |
2 ♣ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
September 21st, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 9 Comments
To articulate sweet sounds together Is to work harder than all these, and yet Be thought an idler.
W. B. Yeats
| S |
North |
| E-W |
♠ J 7 5 3
♥ 8 5
♦ A 10 8 5 3
♣ A 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ 8 6
♥ J 10 7 4
♦ Q 6 4
♣ Q J 10 3 |
♠ Q 10 9 2
♥ 9 6 3 2
♦ —
♣ 9 8 7 5 2 |
| South |
♠ A K 4
♥ A K Q
♦ K J 9 7 2
♣ K 6 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 2 ♣ |
Pass |
2 ♦ |
Pass |
| 3 NT |
Pass |
6 NT |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♣Q
Nothing looks better here than leading partner’s suit. Having implied length in hearts, should one lead a count card (a fourth highest two, or the three if playing third and low) or the eight? Since declarer rates to be very weak, I don’t feel obliged to clarify the position of the honors for him, and partner should be able to work out what I have from the sight of dummy. I will therefore lead a low heart.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ J 9 5
♥ 8 5 3 2
♦ A 4
♣ A Q 8 7 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♦ |
Pass |
Pass |
| Dbl. |
Rdbl. |
1 ♥ |
1 ♠ |
| All pass |
|
|
|
September 20th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 8 Comments
|
Please tell me the name of the convention, which has appeared in your column more than once. After opener raises responder’s major-suit response, responder bids two no-trump to ask if opener has three- or four-card support, and to determine the strength of opener’s hand. Opener then defines his hand by a three-level response. If you know a name for the convention I would appreciate your publishing it.
Duke of Earl, Phoenix, Ariz.
I’ve heard this referred to as mini/maxi and also as spiral; if it has an official name, I do not know it! Bridgewinners discusses the subject.
Can you tell me what you consider to be the reasonable constraints for the suitability for a take-out double of an opening bid of a minor-suit? Does it guarantee 4-4 in the majors or might it be as flat as 3-3 in the majors? And what about the minimum length in the unbid minor?
Weight Watcher, New Orleans, La.
These days the purists are losing the battle for the takeout double to have perfect shape. A double of a minor suit should always deliver at least three cards in each major, and be relatively short in the suit doubled (three cards is the exception not the rule). But doubling one diamond with e.g. a 4=4=3=2 shape and a good hand may be the smallest lie. This sort of action has an element of danger — but that doesn’t make it wrong.
When your partner doubles a one-level opening bid, I assume you play jump responses are invitational. But what are double-jumps? And should you modify the meaning of the jump if the next hand redoubles your partner?
Bouncy Castle, Trenton, N.J.
|
As you say, jumps are best played as invitational (say 9-11, ideally with five trumps). After a redouble, the jump should be more shape and fewer high cards – closer to preemptive in nature. And double jumps always sound preemptive in nature to me.
When my partner opens one diamond, how do you feel about trying to improve the contract on a hand without the traditional values for a response? Specifically, I had: ♠ Q-9-7-4-3, ♥ Q-10-7-2, ♦ 3-2, ♣ 9-3. I elected to pass and found my partner struggling in a 4-2 fit while we had a 5-4 spade fit and even some remote chances to make game.
David the Dredger, Janesville, Wis.
For both tactical and strategic reasons I tend to respond lighter to a minor than to a major (the chance of improving the contract or stealing from the opponents are the two main reasons for bidding). Here I think a one spade response is entirely reasonable. You can pass a rebid in diamonds or correct a one no-trump rebid to two hearts to show a weak hand with both majors.
With both sides vulnerable, my partner dealt and opened one spade. My RHO bid three clubs, pre-emptive. I held ♠ Q, ♥ 10-5-2, ♦ K-J-10-9-7-5-3 ♣ 10-2 and passed, believing that three diamonds would indicate a lot more HCP and less support for partner’s suit than I held, and that four diamonds would be an unwise vulnerable pre-empt over a pre-emptive overcall. My partner says I should have gone ahead and bid three diamonds; who is correct please?
Romper Stomper, Torrance, Calif.
You are right, your partner wrong. A bid of three diamonds is a game-force. You must pass here – and note that a jump to four diamonds over three clubs would not be weak with diamonds – it would traditionally be played as a splinter (or perhaps a fitjump) in support of spades.
|
September 19th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 2 Comments
To a philosopher, no circumstance, however trifling, is too minute.
Oliver Goldsmith
| W |
North |
| E-W |
♠ Q 5 2
♥ 8 6 4
♦ A K 7 3
♣ Q 6 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ 7 3
♥ A Q 9 7 5
♦ J 10 9
♣ A 8 4 |
♠ 9 8
♥ J 10 3
♦ Q 8 6 2
♣ J 10 9 5 |
| South |
♠ A K J 10 6 4
♥ K 2
♦ 5 4
♣ K 7 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♥ |
Pass |
Pass |
| 2 ♠* |
Pass |
4 ♠ |
All pass |
*Intermediate in balancing seat
♦J
You might elect to bid diamonds, in which case an invitational jump to three diamonds looks far more appropriate than a pusillanimous response of two diamonds. Or you can bid no-trump. The text books may say that a call of one notrump is constructive; obviously no one is ever dealt a five-count with jack-fifth of spades… I say jump to two no-trump to get your invitational values across best.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 5 2
♥ 8 6 4
♦ A K 7 3
♣ Q 6 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♠ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
September 18th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 11 Comments
Blue color is everlastingly appointed by the Deity to be a source of delight.
John Ruskin
| N |
North |
| Both |
♠ A K 8 7 5
♥ 7 4
♦ A 3
♣ J 8 6 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ 9 4
♥ 8 6 3
♦ 10 9 5
♣ K Q 10 9 3 |
♠ Q J 10 3
♥ A 2
♦ K Q 6 2
♣ 7 5 4 |
| South |
♠ 6 2
♥ K Q J 10 9 5
♦ J 8 7 4
♣ A |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♠ |
Pass |
| 2 ♥ |
Pass |
2 ♠ |
Pass |
| 4 ♥ |
All pass |
|
|
♣K
Players are taught not to rebid five-card suits if a sensible alternative exists. But that stricture does not apply in a two-over-one auction when opener is unsuitable for a call at no-trump. I believe that a rebid at the three-level (three clubs here) would show extra shape or high cards. To my mind, a simple rebid of a decent five-card suit is more descriptive and economical.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A K 8 7 5
♥ 7 4
♦ A 3
♣ J 8 6 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
2 ♦ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
September 17th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 15 Comments
If it walks like a duck, quacks like a duck, looks like a duck, it must be a duck.
Proverb
| S |
North |
| Both |
♠ K J 10 7 4 3
♥ 9 6 2
♦ 7 4
♣ 8 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q 9 5 2
♥ K 8 4
♦ 8 5
♣ Q J 10 2 |
♠ 8
♥ A Q J 7
♦ K Q 10 2
♣ 9 7 6 3 |
| South |
♠ A 6
♥ 10 5 3
♦ A J 9 6 3
♣ A K 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
2 ♥ |
Pass |
| 2 ♠ |
Pass |
Pass |
Dbl. |
| Pass |
3 ♣ |
3 ♠ |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♣Q
This is the sort of hand where knowledge of the vulnerability is critical. Wild horses would not tempt me to act if vulnerable, but if at favorable vulnerability I might even risk a three spade preempt. With neither side vulnerable I would feel obliged to act – you could tempt me to break discipline and open two spades. You’re only young once.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K J 10 7 4 3
♥ 9 6 2
♦ 7 4
♣ 8 4 |
|
Today’s deal presented an awkward problem for South after the intervention over two clubs. His pass promised at least semipositive values, since with 0-4 points South would have doubled two spades. Then, facing a takeout double, he cuebid and next jumped to five hearts since he thought he had too much for a simple call of four hearts over four diamonds. So he reached the normal slam in unusual fashion.
After the lead of the spade three to the ace there was no point in trying to ruff a spade in dummy immediately, given the weak trumps in hand and the shortage of entries back to South. Instead it looked right to take the heart king and queen, hoping for the hearts to break. If they had done so, you would draw trump and give up a spade, hoping to be able to work out the ending in the fullness of time.
However, the 4-1 trump break was very bad news. See if you can find a legitimate play for the contract now. In fact the least unlikely chance to play for is to hope West holds four diamonds in addition to his four hearts – certainly not impossible, given East’s overcall.
You must take the diamond king and ace, then lead a diamond to the 10. The diamond queen allows you to throw a club as West continues to follow suit. Then the club ace-king and a club ruff brings the trick total to 11. The heart jack in dummy is the 12th winner.