October 2nd, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 7 Comments
Don’t view me with a critic’s eye But pass my imperfections by.
David Everett
| W |
North |
| N-S |
♠ A K 8 6 4
♥ 3
♦ A K 10 5
♣ A 4 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q 10 7 5 2
♥ 6 5
♦ Q 9 6 4 2
♣ 5 |
♠ 9
♥ K 10 9 2
♦ J 7 3
♣ K J 8 7 6 |
| South |
♠ J 3
♥ A Q J 8 7 4
♦ 8
♣ Q 10 9 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
3 ♦ |
Pass |
| 3 ♥ |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♦2
The simple route is to jump to three hearts (or even more trustingly) to four hearts. But will either you or your partner know what to do over a bid of four spades? I wouldn’t bet on it. Far more descriptive is for you as a passed hand to jump to three clubs to show a fit jump with heart support and a decent source of tricks in clubs. This will help partner judge a competitive auction far better.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 9
♥ K 10 9 2
♦ J 7 3
♣ K J 8 7 6 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| Pass |
Pass |
1 ♥ |
Dbl. |
| ? |
|
|
|
October 1st, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 19 Comments
I am amazed that anyone who has made a fortune should send for his friends.
Aristophanes
| S |
North |
| N-S |
♠ K Q 7 6
♥ Q 8 2
♦ A 6
♣ A K 8 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ 10 9
♥ 9 3
♦ K 8 5 4
♣ Q 9 7 6 3 |
♠ J 3 2
♥ A K J 6
♦ 10 9 7 3 2
♣ 4 |
| South |
♠ A 8 5 4
♥ 10 7 5 4
♦ Q J
♣ J 10 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| Pass |
Pass |
1 ♣* |
1 ♥ |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
2 NT |
Pass |
| 3 ♠ |
Pass |
4 ♠ |
All pass |
*Strong, 16+
♥9
I could understand the logic of bidding one spade; you do after all have clubs and spades. But you have a balanced hand best described by rebidding two no-trumps. If you do that you may find a black-suit fit subsequently, but if you bid one spade you can never show your precise values later on.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K Q 7 6
♥ Q 8 2
♦ A 6
♣ A K 8 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
Pass |
| 1 ♣ |
Pass |
1 ♥ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
September 30th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 11 Comments
Ill fortune never crushed that man whom good fortune deceived not.
Ben Jonson
| N |
North |
| E-W |
♠ K 6 4 3 2
♥ A 6 3
♦ 7 2
♣ 9 4 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ 7
♥ 8 4
♦ K 9 8 6 4
♣ K 8 7 5 2 |
♠ A J 8 5
♥ 9 5 2
♦ J 10
♣ Q J 10 6 |
| South |
♠ Q 10 9
♥ K Q J 10 7
♦ A Q 5 3
♣ A |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
Pass |
Pass |
| 1 ♥ |
Pass |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
| 3 ♦ |
Pass |
3 ♥ |
Pass |
| 3 ♠ |
Pass |
4 ♥ |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♣2
I would not feel embarrassed to keep the auction open with a call of one spade. I am at the one-level and already a passed hand; my partner won’t get overly excited by my responding here, and it makes life far harder for the opening bidder to come back in when he has a marginal action. If you pass here, he has a far easier re-opening decision.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K 6 4 3 2
♥ A 6 3
♦ 7 2
♣ 9 4 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| Pass |
1 ♣ |
1 ♦ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
September 29th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
We are all strong enough to bear the misfortunes of others.
Duc de La Rochefoucauld
| S |
North |
| None |
♠ 9 5 3
♥ J 8 7 3
♦ J 9 5 4
♣ J 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ 8 7 6
♥ 5 2
♦ K Q 8 7 3
♣ Q 7 6 |
♠ K Q J 2
♥ 9 6
♦ 10 6
♣ A K 10 9 3 |
| South |
♠ A 10 4
♥ A K Q 10 4
♦ A 2
♣ 8 5 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♥ |
Pass |
1 NT |
Dbl. |
| 2 NT |
Pass |
3 ♥ |
Pass |
| 4 ♥ |
All pass |
|
|
♦K
There is a straightforward choice here. You can make the call to show a second negative – which should be either two no-trump or three clubs, depending on partnership style. (For what it is worth, I prefer three clubs here.) Or you can jump to four hearts, suggesting trump support but a bad hand – no ace or king and no singleton in a side suit. I marginally prefer the latter route, but it is close.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 9 5 3
♥ J 8 7 3
♦ J 9 5 4
♣ J 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
2 ♣ |
Pass |
| 2 ♦ |
Pass |
2 ♥ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
September 28th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
Knowledge may give weight, but accomplishments give luster, and many more people see than weigh.
Earl of Chesterfield
| S |
North |
| N-S |
♠ K 10 9 2
♥ Q
♦ K J 9 8
♣ A 8 7 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ J 5
♥ K 9 7 5 3
♦ A 10
♣ K Q J 5 |
♠ 6 4 3
♥ J 10 8 4
♦ Q 7 6 4
♣ 6 4 |
| South |
♠ A Q 8 7
♥ A 6 2
♦ 5 3 2
♣ 10 9 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| Pass |
1 ♥ |
Dbl. |
2 ♥ |
| 4 ♠ |
All pass |
|
|
♣K
Clearly, you are going to lead a minor, so the question is whether to pick the more aggressive or more passive option. Dummy rates to put down only four (or perhaps five) cards in the minors. It looks natural to me to try to cash winners if you can, before declarer discards losers from one suit on the other (or on dummy’s hearts). That being the case, I’ll go for a club rather than a diamond.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ K 6 2
♥ Q 8 3 2
♦ 10 7 2
♣ Q 8 7 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♥ |
Pass |
1 ♠ |
| Pass |
2 ♠ |
Pass |
4 ♠ |
| All pass |
|
|
|
September 27th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 14 Comments
|
I know most people play a double of a four heart opening bid as optional – maybe with an emphasis on take-out. What about a double of four spades, or a double after partner opens and the next hand overcalls four spades? I’d also be interested to know how the experts treat doubles of five-level overcalls.
Hunting the Snark, Galveston, Texas
I’d say that most play that one removes a double of four spades to a contract one expects to make, but otherwise passes. The same applies even more clearly to a double of a five-level bid. Try not to remove the double from fear; play partner for the odd trick or two for his double, and hope he can beat their contract in his own hand.
I had always been taught that the double of a major always showed the ability to play in the other major. Is that right or if a hand is strong enough can you start by doubling on a one or two-suited hand?
Heartfelt Harry, Albany, Ga.
With spades and a strong hand one can generally double, then insist on playing one’s suit. With hearts the position is less clear. The problem is that if the opponents bid spades you may find it hard to introduce your suit at a convenient level. Doubling with a one-suiter in spades is fine by me on 17 or so. If you have another one-suiter or a two-suiter, you need even more to start with a double.
I have seen your comments on leading high from three or four small in a suit you have raised. Would you lead your highest card if you had four card support: J-94-2, for instance?
Mumbles, Schaumburg, Ill.
|
This holding looks appropriate for a low card lead to me (the jack is an honor here). Whenever partner might need to know count, I’d try to give him that on lead (playing third and fifth leads the count is easier to read than in standard fourth highest methods, by the way). Whenever I think it is important to partner to know if I have an honor, I go with a high or low card as appropriate.
Can you comment on when, if ever, opener can rebid a five-card suit, without it promising six?
Nanny Goat, Staten Island, N.Y.
Opener strives not to repeat a five-card suit after a one-level response. Exceptions come (typically over partner’s one spade response) when with a 2-4-2-5 pattern and 12-15, including a small doubleton in diamonds, you might repeat the clubs. Things are different after a 2/1 game-forcing auction. If you play opener’s new suit at the three-level shows five or extras, and that two no-trump guarantees stoppers (or length) in the unbid suits, you sometimes have to rebid a chunky five-carder.
If the opponents overcall my partner’s opening bid, should I use weak-jump responses? Or is there a better meaning for jumps in new suits?
Grasshopper Mind, Laredo, Texas
I hate weak jump responses if the opponents are silent – I see no reason to preempt our side out of the auction when the opponents have shown no sign of bidding. But when the opponents overcall or double, using a jump as weak makes sense, particularly by an unpassed hand. And all jump raises in competition should always be weak. By passed hands, use fit-jumps in all new suits.
|
September 26th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 8 Comments
Without leaps of imagination or dreaming, we lose the excitement of possibilities. Dreaming, after all is a form of planning.
Gloria Steinem
| N |
North |
| None |
♠ A 7
♥ K Q J 6
♦ K Q 10 4
♣ A K 7 |
| West |
East |
♠ 3
♥ 10 9 7 4
♦ J 9 8 3
♣ J 6 4 2 |
♠ K Q J 10 9 8 6
♥ 8
♦ 7 6
♣ Q 10 5 |
| South |
♠ 5 4 2
♥ A 5 3 2
♦ A 5 2
♣ 9 8 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
2 ♣ |
2 ♠ |
| Pass |
Pass |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| 3 ♠ |
Pass |
4 ♦ |
Pass |
| 5 ♥ |
Pass |
6 ♥ |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♠3
Were you tempted to raise spades, or to respond one no-trump? When partner bids two suits and you have decent support for the first-bid suit, simply give preference to that suit. Yes, diamonds scores less well than making a spade or notrump contract. But the last time I checked, it was better to go plus than minus. Even a partial club stopper might tempt me to settle for a call of one no-trump.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 5 4 2
♥ A 5 3 2
♦ A 5 2
♣ 9 8 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♦ |
Pass |
| 1 ♥ |
Pass |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
September 25th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 3 Comments
Among all forms of mistake, prophecy is the most gratuitous.
George Eliot
| N |
North |
| N-S |
♠ Q 7 5 2
♥ 8
♦ K J 10 5 2
♣ A K Q |
| West |
East |
♠ A K 9 6
♥ 10 6 5 4 2
♦ 7 4 3
♣ 6 |
♠ 10 8 4
♥ Q 9 3
♦ A Q 9 6
♣ 10 7 3 |
| South |
♠ J 3
♥ A K J 7
♦ 8
♣ J 9 8 5 4 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♦ |
Pass |
| 1 ♥ |
Pass |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
| 2 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♥4
Your partner has suggested a slam, and denied a club control in so doing. When you cooperate by bidding four hearts you should promise a club control (which you have – in spades, so to speak) as well as suggesting suitability for slam. While you certainly would not make a try above the game level, you should allow partner to investigate for slam if he wants.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 7 5 2
♥ 8
♦ K J 10 5 2
♣ A K Q |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♦ |
Pass |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
| 3 ♠ |
Pass |
4 ♦ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
September 24th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
He shall come to judge the quick and the dead.
Book of Common Prayer
| W |
North |
| Both |
♠ A K Q 5
♥ K Q 4
♦ 8 4
♣ A Q 3 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ 8 2
♥ A 10 8
♦ K 7 6
♣ K J 6 5 4 |
♠ J 10 6 4
♥ 9 7 6 5 2
♦ Q 3
♣ 8 7 |
| South |
♠ 9 7 3
♥ J 3
♦ A J 10 9 5 2
♣ 10 9 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 NT* |
Dbl. |
2 ♣ |
| Pass |
Pass |
Dbl. |
2 ♥ |
| Pass |
Pass |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| 2 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
*11 – 14
♠8
The three diamond call is a transfer to hearts, a suit you fit well. Should you do more than bid three hearts as requested? No indeed. Imagine partner with a hand that would pass three hearts (jack-fifth of hearts and the diamond queen, say). You might well be struggling to make even nine tricks. If partner had transferred to spades, I would do more – the fourth trump and ruffing value might be critical.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A K Q 5
♥ K Q 4
♦ 8 4
♣ A Q 3 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 2 NT |
Pass |
3 ♦ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
September 23rd, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 8 Comments
People who don’t take risks generally make about two big mistakes a year. People who do take risks generally make about two big mistakes a year.
Peter Drucker
| E |
North |
| E-W |
♠ 10 9
♥ A K J 4
♦ 10 7 4 2
♣ K 9 5 |
| West |
East |
♠ 8 7 6
♥ Q 8 7 6 5
♦ K J 3
♣ J 3 |
♠ A 3
♥ 9 3
♦ 9 8 5
♣ A Q 10 8 7 4 |
| South |
♠ K Q J 5 4 2
♥ 10 2
♦ A Q 6
♣ 6 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
Pass |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
1 NT |
2 ♣ |
| 2 ♠ |
Pass |
3 ♠ |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♣J
Your partner’s three heart call asks you to describe your hand in terms of spade suit, club fit or diamond stopper. It shows hearts rather than asking about the suit. With a solid diamond stopper bid three no-trump now. You could persuade me that I hadn’t shown the full quality of my spades yet. I agree; but I’d rather head for no-trump first and hope that we can back into spades later. No-trump can’t wait.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K Q J 5 4 2
♥ 10 2
♦ A Q 6
♣ 6 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
2 ♣ |
Pass |
| 2 ♠ |
Pass |
3 ♥ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
|
In the semi-final of the women’s teams in the 2002 McConnell trophy, both tables declared three no-trump by South. Randi Montin received the challenging lead of the diamond two. She guessed well to play low from dummy and Jet Pasman put in the diamond seven, which was not likely to be the right play. This let Montin score her eight, and declarer now tried to set up the clubs by passing the club queen (though maybe the shortage of entries to hand might suggest the alternative approach of leading to the ace?). When Pasman won and shifted to the spade nine, declarer eventually was able to throw West on lead in diamonds, to build an extra spade trick for dummy and make her game.
Kerri Sanborn also led a diamond, which went to Irina Levitina’s jack. Now on the heart shift van Zwol took the queen and passed the club queen to Levitina. The spade nine went to the jack, queen, and king, and van Zwol cashed the spade ace to find the bad news there.
The critical play came on this trick when Levitina pitched a heart rather than a club. Van Zwol did her best by cashing the diamond ace-king and the club ace, then exiting with a club. But Levitina won that and returned a club, and declarer, down to all hearts, had to play ace and another heart. Levitina had the last two tricks with the heart king and the 13th club. Had East pitched a club on the second spade, she might well have been endplayed with a low heart, to lead that suit back at trick 12 into declarer’s tenace.