July 27th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 8 Comments
Fate is never fair. You are caught in a current much stronger than you are; struggle against it and you’ll drown not just yourself but those who try to save you. Swim with it, and you’ll survive.
Cassandra Clare
| W |
North |
| Both |
♠ K 10 9 5
♥ 10 3
♦ A K
♣ 9 7 6 4 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ 7 3
♥ Q 8 7 6 5
♦ 10 8 5 3 2
♣ 2 |
♠ 6 4
♥ K J 4 2
♦ Q J 6
♣ A Q J 10 |
| South |
♠ A Q J 8 2
♥ A 9
♦ 9 7 4
♣ K 8 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
Pass |
1 ♣ |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
2 ♣ |
Pass |
| 4 ♠ |
All pass |
|
|
♣2
With a potential stopper in each side-suit, you have reasonable hopes that if declarer has a second suit, it won’t run and if does you probably won’t beat the slam! That being said, leading from any honor might well give up your side’s trick in the suit. So even though passive leads are not nearly as effective against small slams as grand slams, I would lead a trump here.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ 9 6 2
♥ Q 6 4
♦ J 9 4 2
♣ Q 9 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
1 ♠ |
| Pass |
3 ♠ |
Pass |
6 ♠ |
| All pass |
|
|
|
July 26th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 12 Comments
|
I frequently find it hard to judge how far to compete with a little extra shape (or high cards). For example, holding: ♠ 9-4, ♥ J-10-8-7-2, ♦ Q-10-6-4, ♣ K-3 you hear partner open one diamond. You respond heart and when LHO doubles, partner raises to two hearts and RHO bids two spades. Would you bid three hearts at any or all vulnerabilities?
Jumping Jack, Cedar Rapids, Iowa
At all forms of scoring and vulnerability I would surely bid three hearts – the secondary fit means I can’t be seriously damaged in my contract. I think even if my minors were switched I would raise to three hearts, expecting to have nine trumps between us (or to be facing three decent hearts with some side shape). This sort of hand emphasizes that there is some merit to support doubles so that partner’s raise guarantees four trumps.
What convention(s) do you suggest for competing over enemy strong 1 NT opening bids? I’m trying to find the optimum combination of preempting the opponents and not going beyond our own safety level.
The Dark Knight, Augusta, Ga.
Of the simple defenses, Landy works fine by me, but in the last decade Meckwell and Woolsey have gained a lot of traction. Both methods let you bid on a lot of hands, which is the real aim of any convention while giving up the penalty double. A good discussion can be found here, along with how to counter the opponents’ intervention.
What rules would you impose on the appropriate shapes for opening a strong no-trump when within the high-card constraints? For example with: ♠ K-9-6-4, ♥ A-Q, ♦ A-J, ♣ Q-7-4-3-2 would you open one no-trump to protect the redsuit holdings, or would you bid one club?
Gub-Gub, Grand Forks, N.D.
I avoid opening one no-trump with a 5-4 pattern and a four- or five-card spade suit, since either way I have an easy rebid. I admit today’s hand is very close to the exception that proves the rule. With 5-4 shape I open my long suit unless I have a minimum for the call with five of a minor, plus a four-card red suit. With any 17count I prefer to reverse, or open a five-card major if I have one.
|
In your Sunday column with ♠ A-7-3-2, ♥ A-5-3, ♦ Q-9-5, ♣ A-4-2 after opening one club and hearing partner respond one heart, you wrote that you prefer a rebid of one no-trump. I have been taught that you should not pass up a four-card major at the one level because your partner will assume you do not have it and you will miss a 4-4 major fit. Have I been told wrong?
Gil by Association, Panama City, Fla.
I think that with this precise pattern you have discretion as to whether to bid spades or rebid one no-trump (a heart raise with this shape would be rare). With 4-3-2-4 or 4-2-3-4 shape I would normally rebid one spade, I agree. Here, though, the quality of my spades and my minors will influence whether I want to risk losing the spades or not.
Holding: ♠ 8-6-2, ♥ A-Q-J, ♦ A-K-9-7-4, ♣ Q-10 I heard my RHO open one club. Could you weigh up the choices for me — I assume pass is not one of them between a double, or a call of either one diamond, or one no-trump.
R2-D2, Saint John, New Brunswick
You must bid, and there are merits to all the three actions you describe. One diamond gets your long suit in but it makes it harder to show your extras. Double gets most of the values across but I’d rather have at least one four-card major. One no-trump is not so risky and you can always run to two diamonds I suppose, if doubled. Additionally, it does show your range nicely, so it gets my vote. They often don’t lead clubs when they should, on this auction.
|
July 25th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 9 Comments
Success is simple. Do what’s right, the right way, at the right time.
Arnold Glasgow
| S |
North |
| Both |
♠ 7
♥ A J 8 7
♦ K J 8 2
♣ Q 10 8 6 |
| West |
East |
♠ A Q 9 8 3
♥ 4
♦ 9 5
♣ A 7 4 3 2 |
♠ 4 2
♥ Q 9 3
♦ Q 10 7 3
♣ K J 9 5 |
| South |
♠ K J 10 6 5
♥ K 10 6 5 2
♦ A 6 4
♣ — |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
1 NT |
Pass |
| 2 ♥ |
Pass |
3 ♥ |
Pass |
| 4 ♥ |
All pass |
|
|
♦9
You are of course far too good to consider passing. Your real choice is whether to make a simple raise of diamonds, or to cuebid three clubs to suggest a better hand than the raise. This would be my choice because I have so few honors in clubs; facing a 5-5 hand type, my collection should produce a surprising number of tricks for my partner.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 7
♥ A J 8 7
♦ K J 8 2
♣ Q 10 8 6 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♣ |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
| 1 NT |
2 ♣ |
2 ♦ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
July 24th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 12 Comments
Our greatest fear should not be of failure… but of succeeding at things in life that don’t really matter.
Francis Chan
| S |
North |
| None |
♠ —
♥ A K J 9 4 3
♦ A 10 5 4
♣ K 6 5 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q J 8 3
♥ 10 7 6 5
♦ 3
♣ Q J 10 2 |
♠ 10 7 6 5 2
♥ 8 2
♦ K J 9 8 7 6
♣ — |
| South |
♠ A K 9 4
♥ Q
♦ Q 2
♣ A 9 8 7 4 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♣ |
Pass |
1 ♥ |
Pass |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
2 ♦ |
Pass |
| 3 ♣ |
Pass |
4 ♣ |
Pass |
| 4 ♠ |
Dbl. |
6 ♣ |
Pass |
| Pass |
Dbl. |
Rdbl. |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♦3
The general rule on 6-4 hands, even those in the minimum range, is that you bid the four-card suit at your second turn, so long as you can do so efficiently, without making a reverse. The rare exceptions come when all your strength is in the six-carder and the four-card suit is weak. That certainly isn’t so here. So bid two diamonds now.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ —
♥ A K J 9 4 3
♦ A 10 5 4
♣ K 6 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♥ |
Pass |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
July 23rd, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
Mathematics doesn’t care about those beyond the numbers.
Dejan Stojanovic
| N |
North |
| E-W |
♠ A 8 7 6
♥ 4 3
♦ A 5 2
♣ A K 3 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ 10 2
♥ 9 7
♦ Q 10 8 7 6
♣ 10 9 8 6 |
♠ 9 4
♥ K Q J 10 8 6
♦ 4
♣ Q J 7 5 |
| South |
♠ K Q J 5 3
♥ A 5 2
♦ K J 9 3
♣ 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 NT |
2 ♥ |
| 3 ♠ |
Pass |
4 ♣ |
Pass |
| 4 ♦ |
Pass |
4 ♠ |
Pass |
| 5 ♣ |
Pass |
6 ♠ |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♥9
You have a nice hand, but one that is not quite strong enough to double then bid spades. A better approach with hands like these is to overcall one spade, expecting to get a second chance to bid your second suit or double for take-out. You rarely miss game by doing this: partner raises spades when he can, or bids his own suit if he has any values. If he doesn’t, you surely haven’t missed anything.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K Q J 5 3
♥ A 5 2
♦ K J 9 3
♣ 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
1 ♣ |
| ? |
|
|
|
July 22nd, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 9 Comments
Suspicion is the companion of mean souls, and the bane of good society.
Tomas Paine
| S |
North |
| N-S |
♠ 8 6 2
♥ 10 5 4
♦ K 5
♣ A J 10 7 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ K Q 10 9 5
♥ K Q 3
♦ 9 7 6 2
♣ 2 |
♠ 4 3
♥ J 9 8 7
♦ 10 8 4 3
♣ K 8 5 |
| South |
♠ A J 7
♥ A 6 2
♦ A Q J
♣ Q 9 6 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♣ |
1 ♠ |
2 ♠ |
Pass |
| 3 NT |
All pass |
|
|
♠K
If you play a two notrump call as natural here, it wouldn’t be totally wrong to make that bid. But in my view this hand represents a raise to three notrump, not an invitation. Yes it is technically only an eight-count, but your intermediates in your long suit and the likely side-entry mean that game rates to have excellent play, so long as the opponents cannot run a side-suit.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 8 6 2
♥ 10 5 4
♦ K 5
♣ A J 10 7 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 NT |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
July 21st, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
If you were happy every day of your life you wouldn’t be a human being, you’d be a game show host.
Gabriel Heatter
| S |
North |
| N-S |
♠ 7 4 3
♥ K J 9 5 2
♦ K Q 5
♣ Q 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ K 8 2
♥ 8 6
♦ J 10 9 8
♣ 10 7 5 2 |
♠ J 10 9
♥ 4
♦ A 7 6 4 2
♣ A 9 6 3 |
| South |
♠ A Q 6 5
♥ A Q 10 7 3
♦ 3
♣ K J 8 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♥ |
Pass |
3 ♥ |
Pass |
| 4 ♥ |
All pass |
|
|
♦J
This is not the right hand on which to pass for penalties, so the real choice seems to be whether to bid two clubs or whether to respond one no-trump — and yes I suppose a choice of one spade is not entirely from out of left field… or maybe it is? Be that as it may, I’ll opt for bidding my long suit with a call of two clubs; I’d need a fifth club to jump to three clubs here.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ J 10 9
♥ 4
♦ A 7 6 4 2
♣ A 9 6 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♦ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
July 20th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 5 Comments
No great improvements in the lot of mankind are possible, until a great change takes place in the fundamental constitution of their modes of thought.
John Stuart Mill
| S |
North |
| N-S |
♠ Q 3
♥ 7 6 4 2
♦ A 10 4
♣ A K 8 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ J 9 6 5
♥ Q J 10 9
♦ K 8 5
♣ 7 5 |
♠ 2
♥ 8 5 3
♦ Q 9 6 3 2
♣ Q 6 4 3 |
| South |
♠ A K 10 8 7 4
♥ A K
♦ J 7
♣ J 10 9 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
2 ♣ |
Pass |
| 3 ♠ |
Pass |
4 ♦ |
Pass |
| 4 ♥ |
Pass |
5 ♣ |
Pass |
| 5 ♥ |
Pass |
5 ♠ |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♥Q
I’m torn between leading a low spade and starting with the heart king. My choice depends partly on my knowledge if any of the style of my partner and my RHO. The sounder my partner is (or the friskier my RHO might be) the more attractive a heart becomes. Leading a heart has the big plus that it keeps my partner happy — so I’ll go along with that, despite my obvious misgivings.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 10 5 4
♥ K 5
♦ 10 7 3
♣ Q 8 6 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♦ |
1 ♥ |
1 NT |
| All pass |
|
|
|
July 19th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 14 Comments
|
I am relatively inexperienced, and tend only to play rubber bridge, but I am starting to play duplicate. In your column I saw a response of two diamonds to one no-trump to show hearts. Is this part of Standard American?
Innovator, Boise, Idaho
The two-diamond response is a Jacoby transfer, showing hearts. Opener is obligated to complete the transfer, even with only a doubleton. My readers could reasonably ask me why this was obvious. The simple answer is that most people learning bridge are now being taught transfers, and most intermediate players know of transfers even if they do not play them. Where I have space I try to put in the apprpriate footnote.
You recently ran a deal where an expert threw his opponent in to cash some winners — thereby squeezing his own partner. Do you think that non-experts should always assume that experts play relatively accurately and that lesser mortals would do well to avoid any “Greek gifts”?
Trojan Horse, Bremerton, Wash.
Experts are more than fallible too. They can forget to draw trump or simply mis-estimate the chances of an adverse ruff. By contrast if they deliberately throw you in to cash your winners, you can assume that they have probably worked out the consequences. That does not mean it is always wrong to take the winners, of course. But you would certainly be entitled to check the gift horse’s teeth.
Holding: ♠ K-Q-6-4, ♥ Q-J, ♦ 10-6-3-2, ♣ A-10-3 how do you feel about the merits of opening in fourth seat – and what call would you select? Would you bid your minor or bid the major to shut out the hearts?
Red Flags, Charleston, S.C.
I would not pass, but much depends on your partnership style. I think the ‘right’ opening bid at Pairs is one spade, cutting out the opponents’ hearts and trying to steal the board. But if your partner is never going to play you for a four-card major, I might consider either opening one club for the lead instead of one diamond. Switch the majors and pass is more appealing, since the opponents appear to have the spades.
|
I’m trying to improve my defense, and move from an entirely attitude-based system of signaling. How often does the expert player consider suit preference in his carding on defense?
Lost Horizon, Grenada, Miss.
Not every deal is played out, because of claims and concessions. On those that go the distance, an issue of suit-preference (SP) is relevant at least half the time, though a trick may not necessarily be at stake, of course. SP tends to arise on the later round of a suit, or in the discards. Since attitude signals come up on every deal, being able to signal attitude correctly is the priority. Knowing when to signal count or SP is far more challenging – but truly worth the effort.
Today I am going to play bridge for the first time in over 40 years. I used to enjoy the game tremendously during my service years. But after I got out, I never located a bridge club, and eventually gave up looking. I tried teaching my friends, but most didn’t have any interest. What kind of advice would you have for someone like me?
Broadway Danny Rose, The Bronx, N.Y.
By the time you read this you will already have played, but I’ll pass on my thoughts anyway. Bidding has changed a lot. It is much more about having trump fit than having high cards. Get in fast while you can! The play of the cards won’t have changed at all. So maybe take a quick look at one of the books on modern bridge – Larry Cohen might be a good place to start. I’ll suggest a few other authors if you get back to me, and we can talk some more.
|
July 18th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 10 Comments
The artist never entirely knows. We guess. We may be wrong, but we take leap after leap in the dark.
Agnes De Mille
| N |
North |
| E-W |
♠ J 7 3
♥ A J 9 8 6 4 3 2
♦ 7
♣ 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ 9 8 2
♥ 7 5
♦ Q 10 8 4
♣ A 10 9 2 |
♠ 6
♥ Q 10
♦ K J 9 5 3
♣ K J 6 5 3 |
| South |
♠ A K Q 10 5 4
♥ K
♦ A 6 2
♣ Q 8 7 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
3 ♥ |
Pass |
| 3 ♠ |
Pass |
4 ♣* |
Pass |
| 6 ♠ |
All pass |
|
|
*Cuebid agreeing spades
♣A
You could tempt me into perpetrating an unusual no-trump if non-vulnerable, because my secondary honors in both minors encourage action. Vulnerable, I would pass, intending to stay silent unless the auction times out to let me back in conveniently. I like to keep my two-suited bids up to strength, and this one doesn’t quite qualify for immediate action.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 6
♥ Q 10
♦ K J 9 5 3
♣ K J 6 5 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
Pass |
1 ♥ |
| ? |
|
|
|
|
In today’s deal you do well to reach a spade game rather than opting to play no-trump, since on a heart lead there are only eight tricks at no-trump.
Against your contract of four spades you are not upset to see a small club lead — until dummy comes down, and you realize the danger of a ruff. West’s club two goes to East’s ace, and he returns the club queen. Plan the play.
It looks entirely natural to put up play the club king, but you can work out what will happen. West will ruff your club king away, and will not find it difficult to switch to a heart at trick three.After drawing trump you will have to give up a club trick to East, who will cash his heart winner, and you will go one down.
Is there anything you can do to avoid your fate? Yes there is. Try the effect of ducking the club queen at trick two. If East continues with another club, as he surely will, West gets his ruff and shifts to a heart as before.
But the timing is different: you win the heart and draw trump ending in dummy. Then you have time to ruff out the clubs in order to set up a long club for a heart discard. Ducking the club saves you a tempo in establishing the suit. If the defenders do not take their club ruff at trick three but shift to hearts, you will even end up with an overtrick.