September 22nd, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 10 Comments
There are two tragedies in life. One is not to get your heart’s desire. The other is to get it.
G. B. Shaw
| S |
North |
| E-W |
♠ J 10 7
♥ K J 9
♦ A J 3
♣ 7 5 4 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ 9 6 4 3
♥ —
♦ 9 7 6 2
♣ Q J 10 8 6 |
♠ 8 5 2
♥ Q 10 8 4
♦ 10 8 5
♣ K 9 3 |
| South |
♠ A K Q
♥ A 7 6 5 3 2
♦ K Q 4
♣ A |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 2 ♣ |
Pass |
2 ♦ |
Pass |
| 2 ♥ |
Pass |
3 ♥ |
Pass |
| 3 NT* |
Pass |
6 ♥ |
All pass |
*Mild slam try for hearts
♣Q
There are two directions you might go here; you might raise clubs, or bid notrump. I prefer the latter, and though I only have a 10-count, I’m optimistically driving to three notrump, for two reasons. The first is that my four small clubs will help to solidify partner’s suit. The second is that I want to keep the opponents out – they have a lot of major-suit cards after all. A call of two no-trump is also just fine.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ J 10 7
♥ K J 9
♦ A J 3
♣ 7 5 4 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| Pass |
1 ♦ |
2 ♣ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
September 21st, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 9 Comments
To articulate sweet sounds together Is to work harder than all these, and yet Be thought an idler.
W. B. Yeats
| S |
North |
| E-W |
♠ J 7 5 3
♥ 8 5
♦ A 10 8 5 3
♣ A 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ 8 6
♥ J 10 7 4
♦ Q 6 4
♣ Q J 10 3 |
♠ Q 10 9 2
♥ 9 6 3 2
♦ —
♣ 9 8 7 5 2 |
| South |
♠ A K 4
♥ A K Q
♦ K J 9 7 2
♣ K 6 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 2 ♣ |
Pass |
2 ♦ |
Pass |
| 3 NT |
Pass |
6 NT |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♣Q
Nothing looks better here than leading partner’s suit. Having implied length in hearts, should one lead a count card (a fourth highest two, or the three if playing third and low) or the eight? Since declarer rates to be very weak, I don’t feel obliged to clarify the position of the honors for him, and partner should be able to work out what I have from the sight of dummy. I will therefore lead a low heart.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ J 9 5
♥ 8 5 3 2
♦ A 4
♣ A Q 8 7 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♦ |
Pass |
Pass |
| Dbl. |
Rdbl. |
1 ♥ |
1 ♠ |
| All pass |
|
|
|
September 20th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 8 Comments
|
Please tell me the name of the convention, which has appeared in your column more than once. After opener raises responder’s major-suit response, responder bids two no-trump to ask if opener has three- or four-card support, and to determine the strength of opener’s hand. Opener then defines his hand by a three-level response. If you know a name for the convention I would appreciate your publishing it.
Duke of Earl, Phoenix, Ariz.
I’ve heard this referred to as mini/maxi and also as spiral; if it has an official name, I do not know it! Bridgewinners discusses the subject.
Can you tell me what you consider to be the reasonable constraints for the suitability for a take-out double of an opening bid of a minor-suit? Does it guarantee 4-4 in the majors or might it be as flat as 3-3 in the majors? And what about the minimum length in the unbid minor?
Weight Watcher, New Orleans, La.
These days the purists are losing the battle for the takeout double to have perfect shape. A double of a minor suit should always deliver at least three cards in each major, and be relatively short in the suit doubled (three cards is the exception not the rule). But doubling one diamond with e.g. a 4=4=3=2 shape and a good hand may be the smallest lie. This sort of action has an element of danger — but that doesn’t make it wrong.
When your partner doubles a one-level opening bid, I assume you play jump responses are invitational. But what are double-jumps? And should you modify the meaning of the jump if the next hand redoubles your partner?
Bouncy Castle, Trenton, N.J.
|
As you say, jumps are best played as invitational (say 9-11, ideally with five trumps). After a redouble, the jump should be more shape and fewer high cards – closer to preemptive in nature. And double jumps always sound preemptive in nature to me.
When my partner opens one diamond, how do you feel about trying to improve the contract on a hand without the traditional values for a response? Specifically, I had: ♠ Q-9-7-4-3, ♥ Q-10-7-2, ♦ 3-2, ♣ 9-3. I elected to pass and found my partner struggling in a 4-2 fit while we had a 5-4 spade fit and even some remote chances to make game.
David the Dredger, Janesville, Wis.
For both tactical and strategic reasons I tend to respond lighter to a minor than to a major (the chance of improving the contract or stealing from the opponents are the two main reasons for bidding). Here I think a one spade response is entirely reasonable. You can pass a rebid in diamonds or correct a one no-trump rebid to two hearts to show a weak hand with both majors.
With both sides vulnerable, my partner dealt and opened one spade. My RHO bid three clubs, pre-emptive. I held ♠ Q, ♥ 10-5-2, ♦ K-J-10-9-7-5-3 ♣ 10-2 and passed, believing that three diamonds would indicate a lot more HCP and less support for partner’s suit than I held, and that four diamonds would be an unwise vulnerable pre-empt over a pre-emptive overcall. My partner says I should have gone ahead and bid three diamonds; who is correct please?
Romper Stomper, Torrance, Calif.
You are right, your partner wrong. A bid of three diamonds is a game-force. You must pass here – and note that a jump to four diamonds over three clubs would not be weak with diamonds – it would traditionally be played as a splinter (or perhaps a fitjump) in support of spades.
|
September 19th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 2 Comments
To a philosopher, no circumstance, however trifling, is too minute.
Oliver Goldsmith
| W |
North |
| E-W |
♠ Q 5 2
♥ 8 6 4
♦ A K 7 3
♣ Q 6 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ 7 3
♥ A Q 9 7 5
♦ J 10 9
♣ A 8 4 |
♠ 9 8
♥ J 10 3
♦ Q 8 6 2
♣ J 10 9 5 |
| South |
♠ A K J 10 6 4
♥ K 2
♦ 5 4
♣ K 7 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♥ |
Pass |
Pass |
| 2 ♠* |
Pass |
4 ♠ |
All pass |
*Intermediate in balancing seat
♦J
You might elect to bid diamonds, in which case an invitational jump to three diamonds looks far more appropriate than a pusillanimous response of two diamonds. Or you can bid no-trump. The text books may say that a call of one notrump is constructive; obviously no one is ever dealt a five-count with jack-fifth of spades… I say jump to two no-trump to get your invitational values across best.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 5 2
♥ 8 6 4
♦ A K 7 3
♣ Q 6 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♠ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
September 18th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 11 Comments
Blue color is everlastingly appointed by the Deity to be a source of delight.
John Ruskin
| N |
North |
| Both |
♠ A K 8 7 5
♥ 7 4
♦ A 3
♣ J 8 6 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ 9 4
♥ 8 6 3
♦ 10 9 5
♣ K Q 10 9 3 |
♠ Q J 10 3
♥ A 2
♦ K Q 6 2
♣ 7 5 4 |
| South |
♠ 6 2
♥ K Q J 10 9 5
♦ J 8 7 4
♣ A |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♠ |
Pass |
| 2 ♥ |
Pass |
2 ♠ |
Pass |
| 4 ♥ |
All pass |
|
|
♣K
Players are taught not to rebid five-card suits if a sensible alternative exists. But that stricture does not apply in a two-over-one auction when opener is unsuitable for a call at no-trump. I believe that a rebid at the three-level (three clubs here) would show extra shape or high cards. To my mind, a simple rebid of a decent five-card suit is more descriptive and economical.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A K 8 7 5
♥ 7 4
♦ A 3
♣ J 8 6 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
2 ♦ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
September 17th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 15 Comments
If it walks like a duck, quacks like a duck, looks like a duck, it must be a duck.
Proverb
| S |
North |
| Both |
♠ K J 10 7 4 3
♥ 9 6 2
♦ 7 4
♣ 8 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q 9 5 2
♥ K 8 4
♦ 8 5
♣ Q J 10 2 |
♠ 8
♥ A Q J 7
♦ K Q 10 2
♣ 9 7 6 3 |
| South |
♠ A 6
♥ 10 5 3
♦ A J 9 6 3
♣ A K 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
2 ♥ |
Pass |
| 2 ♠ |
Pass |
Pass |
Dbl. |
| Pass |
3 ♣ |
3 ♠ |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♣Q
This is the sort of hand where knowledge of the vulnerability is critical. Wild horses would not tempt me to act if vulnerable, but if at favorable vulnerability I might even risk a three spade preempt. With neither side vulnerable I would feel obliged to act – you could tempt me to break discipline and open two spades. You’re only young once.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K J 10 7 4 3
♥ 9 6 2
♦ 7 4
♣ 8 4 |
September 16th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
Success is always something that you have to recover from.
Marsha Norman
| S |
North |
| N-S |
♠ K
♥ 10 6 4 3
♦ K J 8
♣ J 8 7 4 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ 10 8 5 4 3
♥ Q 7
♦ 10 6
♣ Q 9 6 3 |
♠ J 7 6 2
♥ J 9 5
♦ A Q 5 3
♣ K 10 |
| South |
♠ A Q 9
♥ A K 8 2
♦ 9 7 4 2
♣ A 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
2 ♣ |
Pass |
| 2 ♥ |
Pass |
3 ♥ |
Pass |
| 4 ♥ |
All pass |
|
|
♠4
Normally one starts from the assumption that all bids in the fourth suit are artificial. This is one of the rare exceptions. Since you have already shown some club length and values at your second turn, the two club call suggests a three-suiter, with short hearts. Your hand could hardly be better now. I could barely live with a three-club call, but I think a bid of four clubs would be closer to the value of the hand.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K
♥ 10 6 4 3
♦ K J 8
♣ J 8 7 4 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
1 ♦ |
Pass |
| 1 ♥ |
Pass |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
2 ♣ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
September 15th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 9 Comments
Fear tastes like a rusty knife and do not let her into your house. Courage tastes of blood.
John Cheever
| N |
North |
| E-W |
♠ A 10 4
♥ A
♦ 9 5 4 2
♣ A J 10 4 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q 7 5 3
♥ Q 9 7 6 3
♦ J 3
♣ 9 2 |
♠ J 8 6
♥ K J 5
♦ Q 10 7 6
♣ K 8 5 |
| South |
♠ K 9 2
♥ 10 8 4 2
♦ A K 8
♣ Q 7 6 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♣ |
Pass |
| 2 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♥6
I can see a case for bidding one no-trump (minimum with a spade stopper), repeating the clubs, or bidding the diamonds to suggest both minors. With 4-4 in the minors I’d be less enthusiastic about the two diamond call, but I can stand a retreat to three clubs happily, so it would be my choice. This auction does not show reversing values, by the way. With that, you would bid three diamonds.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A 10 4
♥ A
♦ 9 5 4 2
♣ A J 10 4 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♣ |
1 ♠ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
September 14th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 2 Comments
Bold knaves thrive without one grain of sense, But good men starve for want of impudence.
John Dryden
| S |
North |
| Both |
♠ 10 9 4 3
♥ 9 3
♦ K Q J 9 7 4
♣ Q |
| West |
East |
♠ K 5
♥ K J 10 6 5
♦ 5
♣ A J 9 3 2 |
♠ 6
♥ Q 7 4
♦ A 6 3 2
♣ 10 8 7 6 5 |
| South |
♠ A Q J 8 7 2
♥ A 8 2
♦ 10 8
♣ K 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♠ |
2 ♠* |
4 ♠ |
All pass |
*5-5 shape, hearts and a minor
That is the question!
I’d like to go passive here but I don’t have any passive options. I’ll settle for a fourthhighest club, but if I had a lead that was favorite not to cost a trick I’d surely select that instead. My second choice would be a low spade lead, hoping to hit length in my partner’s hand.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ K 7 4
♥ A 5 4
♦ Q 9 2
♣ Q 10 4 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
Pass |
1 NT |
| Pass |
2 NT |
All pass |
|
September 13th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Sunday, August 30th, 2015
|
When you are three-three in the minors would you advocate opening the stronger minor, for the lead, in third seat or indeed in any other seat? And what about hands with 4-4 in the minors — what should you open and does the seat matter?
First Steps, Kansas City, Mo.
In third seat I tend only to open a three- or four-card minor if light when I am sure I want that suit led. I normally open one club here. In other positions with 4-4 in the minors I tend to open my better suit, whether too weak or too strong for 1 NT. After all, I’d prefer my partner to lead my stronger suit, if in doubt.
Can you tell me about a double jump by opener at his second turn to speak? Specifically, should the unopposed sequence: one diamond – one spade – three hearts show a big two-suiter or short hearts? What about a jump by opener to four clubs?
Jack Rabbit, Schaumburg, Ill.
When a call at one level would be natural and forcing, as is the case with a reverse, or jump, such as one diamond-one spade-two hearts (or three clubs) the call one level higher should show a different hand-type altogether. In the auction: one diamond – one spade – two clubs, the last bid is natural but not forcing, so three clubs is natural and forcing while a jump to four clubs shows short clubs, in support of spades.
Can you tell me how often opener will rebid a five-card as opposed to a six-card suit in an uncontested auction? Is the matter affected by whether responder bids at the one- or two-level?
Called Out, Madison, Wis.
The simple answer is that in an uncontested auction when responder bids at the one level, opener will go out of his way not to rebid a five-card suit. But occasionally (typically after a one spade response) opener will have no choice but to repeat a good five-card suit with an awkward pattern such as 2-4-2-5. After a two-level response, opener frequently opts to repeat a good five-card suit rather than bid two no-trump with a small doubleton in an open suit.
|
I’m having difficulty in differentiating the hand-types that opener might have when he supports partner directly, or delays support. For example, say you open the bidding one diamond and hear partner respond one heart. Isn’t it the case that a direct raise in hearts shows four trumps, while delayed support shows three?
Helping Hand, Pottsville, Pa.
Opener’s direct raise of a major shows four trump, or three trump in an unbalanced minimum. If you always raise partner when you have three trump and are unbalanced, you find your fits at once, and the failure to raise acts as a red flag to partner, who can stay lower on misfits. The delayed raise you mention, of bidding a second suit then raising partner after his minimum rebid, should be reserved for hands with three trump and a king more than a minimum opener.
Holding: ♠ A-J-9-6-2, ♥ 5-2, ♦ Q-7-4-2, ♣ 9-4 would you respond two spades to a two club opening? If not, how much more would you need to make that call?
Stretching the Boundaries, Naples, Fla.
No, with the boss suit I’m sure I can find a way to get them in somehow, no matter what my partner does next. I bid two diamonds first. Change the diamond queen to the king and I’m happy to bid two spades now; the extra control makes a difference. Even with the spade queen instead of the jack I’d opt to upgrade the hand to a positive.
|
|
As South you have become declarer in six hearts on the lead of the club queen. Your three notrump call was conventional, indicating suitability for slam, but no extra values. (With a dead minimum you would sign off in four hearts, with extras you would cuebid yourself). This gadget is known as ‘non-serious three notrump’. For more information check here.
How do you play your slam on the lead of the club queen? The only danger will come if your RHO holds all four trumps, so you must start by playing a low trump towards the dummy, if West follows suit you could insert the jack, but it looks equally good to go up with the king, and if East discards you can come back to hand and lead up to the heart jack. Barring a highly unlikely ruff, you are home.
However if West shows out on the first heart, go up with the king, ruff a club, cash your three top spades, then play a diamond to the jack, ruff a club, and take the diamond king before playing a diamond to the ace. When you lead dummy’s last club, East is down to just three trumps and must ruff in. You underruff, and run East’s forced trump continuation round to dummy’s jack to land your slam.
For this line to succeed you need East in addition to his four hearts to hold three cards in each of the other suits, or precisely a 3=4=4=2 pattern.