July 7th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 7 Comments
To be prepared for war is one of the most effectual means of preserving peace.
George Washington
| N |
North |
| E-W |
♠ K Q 10 4
♥ A K 9 6
♦ Q 9 8 7
♣ A |
| West |
East |
♠ A 7 5
♥ J 2
♦ J 3 2
♣ Q J 8 7 3 |
♠ J 9 8 2
♥ Q 7 4
♦ K 10 6 5
♣ K 6 |
| South |
♠ 6 3
♥ 10 8 5 3
♦ A 4
♣ 10 9 5 4 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♦ |
Pass |
| 1 ♥ |
Pass |
2 NT* |
Pass |
| 3 ♦** |
Pass |
4 ♥ |
All pass |
*Various strong hands
**Weak
♣Q
There are two sensible answers here, the first being to make a splinter-jump to four clubs, for which you are technically in range. The problem here is your weak diamonds and club ace – you would surely be worth that action if your ace were in diamonds not clubs. The simple pessimistic action, which I prefer, is just to jump to four hearts. Don’t be amazed if partner can’t make it!
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K Q 10 4
♥ A K 9 6
♦ Q 9 8 7
♣ A |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
Pass |
Pass |
| 1 ♦ |
Pass |
1 ♥ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
July 6th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
We’re all islands shouting lies to each other across seas of misunderstanding.
Rudyard Kipling
| S |
North |
| None |
♠ A J 8 7 5
♥ 3
♦ A 10 8 7
♣ J 9 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q 4
♥ K 10 7 6 5 2
♦ Q J 6
♣ K 7 |
♠ 10 6 3 2
♥ A 9
♦ 5 4
♣ Q 10 8 6 2 |
| South |
♠ K 9
♥ Q J 8 4
♦ K 9 3 2
♣ A 5 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♦ |
2 ♥ |
2 ♠ |
Pass |
| 2 NT |
Pass |
3 ♦ |
Pass |
| 3 NT |
All pass |
|
|
♠Q
Your opponents seem well prepared for a heart lead against the slam (why else would East raise to six so dramatically?). With no particular reason in mind I’m going to guess to lead spades, perhaps with the idea that if I can force declarer to ruff, maybe the bad club break will cause him some problems.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 9 6 4
♥ 9 6 2
♦ 8 7
♣ J 8 5 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
Pass |
1 ♣ |
| Pass |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
2 ♦ |
| Pass |
3 ♦ |
Pass |
6 ♦ |
| All pass |
|
|
|
July 5th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
|
My partner held the following hand: ♠ A-9-8-3, ♥ Q-10-9-2, ♦ K-10-9-3, ♣ 5 when he heard me open one heart. Was he worth a limit raise, or a jump to game? His choice of inviting game with a simple raise saw me pass with a flat 12-count, but I made five.
Spirit-level, Willoughby, Ohio
The hand is definitely worth a raise to game — you might not always make it, but you’d want to be there facing any normal opening bid. The question is whether instead to make a splinter-raise to four clubs; I might not do that, but a lot depends on how much you play a splinter-bid promises here. Having a way to show a limited splinter-bid, or a constructive raise from one to four is very useful (though by no means essential).
When my opponents lead from the wrong hand at the first trick what are my options?
Straight Arrow, Harrisburg, Pa.
The first thing to do is to call the director if playing at a club. Having said that, the options are to allow the lead to be made and continue play to trick one, with dummy going down and playing fourth to the trick. Or you can either prevent the suit from being played until the true leader has lost the lead, insist on the suit being led, or even ask that the exposed card be played at its first legal opportunity, while allowing the real leader do what he or she likes.
I’m somewhat hazy on the true meaning of the term “Responsive double”. Could you clarify for me whether such doubles are primarily for take-out or penalties or true optional doubles?
Pirate Jack, Bellingham, Wash.
The simplest version of a responsive double comes when your LHO opens the bidding. If your partner doubles, and RHO raises the suit, a double by you would be takeout. Note that should RHO bid a new suit, then double by you would be penalty not take-out. The responsive take-out double of a raised minor normally suggests both majors, while the double of hearts normally denies spades, since you would bid them if you could. In my view a responsive double of spades neither promises nor denies hearts.
|
I’m not clear about how to act after intervention to my partner’s two club opening. My hand was: ♠ J-10-3-2, ♥ Q-6, ♦ J-10-8-6-4, ♣ K-9 and I heard my partner open two clubs and the next player bid three clubs. Is it right to bid three diamonds, and if not, what action would you recommend?
Unsuitable, Dodge City, Kan.
I’d recommend a simple style here where double is any weak hand, with a pass showing something like 5-8 points. In your example I’d pass here; but give me the diamond king instead of the club king and I’d bid three diamonds, because I’d feel this might be my last chance to introduce the suit economically.
In a recent column you discussed the suit lengths required for preemptive bidding. Couldn’t you also mention what HIGH CARDS are essential in that suit? Bidding at the two-level at adverse vulnerability surely cannot be considered without suit quality. Even at favorable vulnerability I’d like to hold two top honors — but where do you stand?
Cockney Sparrow, Coppell, Texas
When vulnerable, two of the top three honors is the normal minimum. And yet I would never pass a decent hand with a holding such as six cards to the acejack-ten. Non-vulnerable I like to have two top honors in second seat but in first and third seat I go with what my gut tells me. Bottom line: I don’t like to open suits without two top honors unless they have decent intermediates or some other compensating value.
|
July 4th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 2 Comments
Honest unaffected distrust of human abilities under all circumstances is the surest sign of strength of mind.
Georg Christoph Lichtenberg
| N |
North |
| N-S |
♠ 9 7 5 4
♥ A Q 10 7
♦ K 5
♣ 10 8 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ 3
♥ K J 9 4
♦ A 10 8 6 2
♣ 9 7 4 |
♠ Q 10 6 2
♥ 3 2
♦ Q 9 4 3
♣ A K 3 |
| South |
♠ A K J 8
♥ 8 6 5
♦ J 7
♣ Q J 6 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
Pass |
Pass |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
2 ♠ |
Pass |
| Pass |
Dbl. |
Rdbl. |
3 ♣ |
| Pass |
Pass |
3 ♠ |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♣4
Unless you have a specific agreement to the contrary, the call of two no-trump is invitational but not forcing, suggesting 10-11 high cards and just four spades. You have a minimum in high cards but a hand that you would guess would play much better in spades than in no-trump, so retreat to three spades.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A K J 8
♥ 8 6 5
♦ J 7
♣ Q J 6 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♣ |
Pass |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
| 2 ♠ |
Pass |
2 NT |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
July 3rd, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Friday, June 19th, 2015
Good instincts usually tell you what you do long before your head has figured it out.
Michael Burke
| W |
North |
| N-S |
♠ A
♥ A 7 5
♦ A 10 8 3 2
♣ A Q 7 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ J 9 7 6 5
♥ Q J 4 2
♦ K Q 9
♣ 8 |
♠ K 4 3 2
♥ 9 6 3
♦ J 5
♣ J 10 9 4 |
| South |
♠ Q 10 8
♥ K 10 8
♦ 7 6 4
♣ K 6 5 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
1 ♦ |
Pass |
| 1 NT |
2 ♦* |
Dbl. |
2 ♠ |
| 2 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
*Majors
♠7
Your partner’s call is non-forcing, and though you have decent club support and the odd value or two, your majorsuit honors are of questionable worth, and three small diamonds is surely a further negative. Pass two clubs, and hope the opponents do not balance. You might raise to three clubs if you had the heart ace instead of the king – and slightly better diamond spots.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 10 8
♥ K 9 8
♦ 9 7 4
♣ K 6 5 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
1 ♦ |
Pass |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
2 ♣ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
July 2nd, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 8 Comments
Dream what you want to dream go where you want to go, be what you want to be because you only have one life and one chance to do all the things you want to do.
Nishan Panwar
| S |
North |
| None |
♠ K 8 6
♥ A K J
♦ 10 9 3
♣ K 10 4 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ 9 4
♥ 10 9 3 2
♦ A K 4
♣ 9 6 5 2 |
♠ 7 5 3
♥ 8 7 6 5 4
♦ Q J 8 5 2
♣ — |
| South |
♠ A Q J 10 2
♥ Q
♦ 7 6
♣ A Q J 8 7 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
2 ♣ |
Pass |
| 3 ♥* |
Pass |
3 ♠ |
Pass |
| 4 ♣ |
Pass |
4 ♠ |
All pass |
*Splinter-bid: short hearts, agreeing clubs
♦K
It is rare that you can be confident with a hand this good that the correct percentage action is to pass as soon as decorum permits. You are far short of the values for overcalling in no-trump. And if you double for take-out you may well find your partner suffering in a 4-3 fit with no high cards and a bad split against him, doubled, to boot. Your partner can still balance if he has the right hand.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K 8 6
♥ A K J
♦ 10 9 3
♣ K 10 4 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
Pass |
2 ♠ |
| ? |
|
|
|
July 1st, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 7 Comments
I never make stupid mistakes. Only very, very clever ones.
John Peel
| S |
North |
| N-S |
♠ Q 8 3
♥ 10 7 3
♦ Q 9 6 4 2
♣ A K |
| West |
East |
♠ J 9 2
♥ J 8
♦ A J 3
♣ Q J 5 3 2 |
♠ 10 7 6 5
♥ Q 9 6 5 2
♦ 10 8
♣ 8 4 |
| South |
♠ A K 4
♥ A K 4
♦ K 7 5
♣ 10 9 7 6 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♣3
You are too good for a simple raise to two hearts, and the hand doesn’t feel quite right for a call of one no-trump, since you may be offering partner club ruffs in dummy, which he could hardly predict. All that is left is a cuebid of two clubs, the so-called unassuming cue bid, showing a limit raise in high cards. By contrast, a jump to three hearts is nowadays played more about shape than high cards.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 8 3
♥ 10 7 3
♦ Q 9 6 4 2
♣ A K |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♣ |
1 ♥ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
June 30th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 5 Comments
The plan, a memory of the future, tries on reality to see if it fits.
Laurence Gonzales
| N |
North |
| None |
♠ A 9 3 2
♥ 4 2
♦ K 8 3
♣ A 7 6 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ K Q J 10 8
♥ J 10 8 3
♦ Q 10
♣ K 10 |
♠ 7 5 4
♥ 9
♦ J 9 7 5 4
♣ Q 9 8 5 |
| South |
♠ 6
♥ A K Q 7 6 5
♦ A 6 2
♣ J 4 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
Pass |
Pass |
| 1 ♥ |
1 ♠ |
2 NT |
Pass |
| 4 ♥ |
All pass |
|
|
♠K
Since you have enough points to know your side has the majority of high cards, lead a trump to prevent the opponents scoring their trumps separately. It is a good thought to have at the back of your mind that when the opponents are not overly blessed with high cards, and do not appear to have a side-suit to set up and run, leading trumps is generally indicated.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ J 9 7 3 2
♥ J 9 2
♦ J 8
♣ A J 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♣ |
Pass |
| 1 ♠ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
4 ♥ |
| All pass |
|
|
|
June 29th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 10 Comments
If you want to cut your own throat, don’t come to me for a bandage.
Margaret Thatcher
| N |
North |
| Both |
♠ A 9 6 2
♥ 5 3
♦ 10 6 4 3 2
♣ J 10 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q J 8 4 3
♥ Q 10 9 8 2
♦ A 5
♣ 7 |
♠ 10 7 5
♥ 7
♦ K Q J 9 8
♣ 9 8 5 2 |
| South |
♠ K
♥ A K J 6 4
♦ 7
♣ A K Q 6 4 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
Pass |
Pass |
| 1 ♣ |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
2 ♠ |
| 4 ♥ |
Pass |
5 ♣ |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♦A
This deal shows the divide between pairs and teams. At teams, where you are trying to set the contract, and overtricks are less unimportant, you should focus on the suit most likely to set the game. I’d lead a low heart at teams, while at pairs I’d try the club eight — that being the suit least likely to surrender an unnecessary trick. I tend to favor passive defense when in doubt on blind auctions like this.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ K 6 5 2
♥ Q 9 8
♦ K 9 8
♣ 8 6 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
Pass |
1 ♦ |
| Pass |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
2 NT |
| Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
|
June 28th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 3 Comments
|
I recently missed a game when I responded one no-trump to a one diamond opening on an unpromising eight-count with 3-3-3-4 pattern and no 10s. My partner raised to two no-trumps, and I expected him to be a shapely hand in the strong no-trump range so I passed. It turned out he had 18 points. I thought one would jump to game with that hand?
Wrong Brother, Atlanta, Ga.
I’ll stay on the fence for this. To me your partner has a fair case; since the range for one no-trump is 6-10 you don’t have to bid game with a square 18-count, Though equally you might bid two no-trump with a semi-balanced 16-17. Thus in response I’d treat an eight-count as an acceptance. However, if I didn’t trust partner I’d certainly pass.
If you open one club holding: ♠ 3, ♥ A-J-6, ♦ K-Q-4-2, ♣ A-K-9-3-2 and partner responds one spade, should you jump to two notrumps, or bid two diamonds as a reverse?
A Suitable Case, Holland, Mich.
With an unbalanced hand like this one, bid your suits not no-trump. Switch the minors and I’d have more sympathy with the jump in no-trump, as I would not yet have shown my extras, but I think I’d still settle for bidding out my hand pattern with a two-club call, not a game-forcing bid of three clubs. I hope there will be time for no-trump on the next round.
When you hear an opening four hearts to your right, and you hold a 14-count with 3-1-4-5 pattern, do you pass or double? And what if the auction comes round to you in balancing seat?
Streaky Bacon, New Smyrna Beach, Fla.
|
You would have a 100% unanimous panel vote if this were a problem. A double of four hearts suggests a good hand, more for take-out than optional, so most would feel obliged to act. Yes, holding only three spades isn’t great, but doubling is the flexible and consultative call. It won’t always work, but it is clearly the best way to have a dialogue not a monologue.
I’m reading in your columns a use of the term New Minor. This seems to work like Stayman, but when does it apply, and would you encourage a relative newcomer to consider learning it?
Conventional Chuck, Palm Springs, Calif.
I am opposed to teaching anyone new conventions. But I admit that after opener’s rebid of one or two no-trump this gadget (which uses an unbid minor suit by responder at his second turn as forcing) is a sensible way to ask opener to reveal three-card support for responder, or to announce four cards in an unbid major.
I was stuck for a call holding: ♠ Q-7-3, ♥ Q-8-6-2, ♦ J-4-3, ♣ 1-0-8-7 when my partner doubled an opening bid of one heart. How would you compare passing, bidding one no-trump, or inventing a suit?
Two in the Glue, Wichita Falls, Texas
Passing is unacceptable here (one needs real trump length and trump tricks to do that) so your choice appears to be to invent a suit or to risk one notrump, which suggests a rather better hand than this. I guess I’d try one no-trump and cross my fingers; bidding one spade always seems to backfire here, since partners seem to raise excessively on finding a fit. Thus two clubs would be my second choice.
|
|
Roy Welland was once a regular in contention for the US International team – he lost the finals of three consecutive US team trials. But he now spends much time in Germany and in partnership with Sabine Auken he has recently made it on to the German team that qualified in Opatija last year for the 2015 Bermuda Bowl. Roy has a talent for the unorthodox in the auction, but is no mean card-player either, and he demonstrated it in today’s deal.
After a light but entirely understandable response of one heart to his partner’s one diamond opening bid, Welland found himself in four hearts on a top club lead. He won, played the spade king to the ace, won the low heart return in dummy and played the diamond ace and guessed well when he led a diamond to the eight. He had correctly assumed that West would not be able to bring himself to duck the king. East won the diamond 10 and exited with the club king. Welland ruffed in dummy, then played the diamond queen, covered by the king and ruffed, to bring down the jack.
He next led a trump to dummy, and, trusting the opponents’ count card in spades, he reconstructed the West hand to have a 3=2=3=5 original distribution.
Accordingly, he next cashed the diamond nine to pitch his spade, ruffed a spade to hand, and ruffed a club to dummy. To prevent this trick representing declarer’s 10th winner, East had to overruff, but he then had to lead a spade into dummy’s tenace, to concede the contract.