August 3rd, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 8 Comments
History is mostly guessing; the rest is prejudice.
Will Durant
| S |
North |
| Both |
♠ 9 8 7 6 4 3 2
♥ 6
♦ 4
♣ Q 9 8 5 |
| West |
East |
♠ K
♥ J 9 7 2
♦ J 10 9 8 6
♣ 7 4 3 |
♠ J 5
♥ Q 8 4 3
♦ A K 5 2
♣ K J 10 |
| South |
♠ A Q 10
♥ A K 10 5
♦ Q 7 3
♣ A 6 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♣ |
Pass |
1 ♥* |
Pass |
| 2 NT |
Pass |
4 ♥* |
Pass |
| 4 ♠ |
All pass |
|
|
*Transfers to spades
♦J
The diamond suit must be your best chance to defeat the game. The normal lead from this holding is the king, but at teams you might be prepared to sacrifice overtricks to maximize your chance to set the game. If you lead a low diamond this works when partner has the doubleton ace and dummy jack-third (or declarer jack-fourth). So I’d risk the low diamond lead at teams.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ 10 4 2
♥ J 10 5
♦ K Q 10 7 3
♣ 6 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
Pass |
1 ♣ |
| Pass |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
2 NT |
| Pass |
3 NT |
Pass |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
August 2nd, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 12 Comments
|
Is anyone allowed to touch the dummy if the cards in dummy are put down wrong, or arranged untidily? And what are dummy’s rights, and restrictions when an infraction occurs?
Punky Brewster, San Francisco, Calif.
If dummy is hard to see I tend to ask him to straighten the cards up — or if he appears unable to do that, I will ask if it is acceptable for me to do it myself. Dummy should limit himself to preventing an infraction (if declarer is about to lead from the wrong hand). So after dummy spots an infraction, he should wait till play is over, then tell the other players. However, once an infraction is agreed to have taken place, dummy should call the director if no one else has.
Do you ever get tired of South and North doing all the bidding? I do! I would prefer to see more competitive auctions.
Nil by Mouth, Albuquerque, N.M.
I do try to have contested auctions a fair amount of the time. Note that for bridge readers, having North, East or West declare the hand is somewhat counter-intuitive and a little hard to follow. So that is why it is South who tends to have the good hand or be declarer.
When I read your bridge column I often lose the nuances of the bidding. Can you recommend a book that will explain some modern bidding techniques?
Gentleman Caller, Corpus Christi, Texas
I do sometimes forget to explain modern bidding fully enough. Space constraints and my memory may be the cause. Better Bidding with Bergen and 25 Bridge Conventions You Should Know, by Marc Smith and Barbara Seagram both cover some useful territory. But maybe read my column which appears online at bridgeblogging.com two weeks after publication, and you can ask me questions directly!
|
Holding: ♠ Q-J-3-2, ♥ J-9-2, ♦ K-J-9-4-3, ♣ 3 I heard my partner open one heart and raised him to two hearts. (Do you agree with that decision?). When my partner bid three clubs, I thought he needed help there, so I signed off in three hearts. Any comments?
Hip-Hop Henry, Akron, Ohio
Most people play three clubs as a help-suit bid of some sort. Typically the most useful holding opposite is honors, but a singleton is not so bad — and the rest of your hand is about par for the course. I think I’d temporize with three diamonds and pass the buck back to my partner.
Is there a standard method for the defenders to split their honors when a card is led from dummy? When declarer leads a low card and you are second to play with touching honors, which card should you play, and does it matter if you have a two- or three-card sequence?
Ruling Class, Huntington, W. Va.
There is by no means a universal agreement here among experts that I know of. My custom is that with a two-card sequence I play the lower card, with a three-card sequence I play the highest. It is far more important to have an agreement than precisely what that agreement is.
|
August 1st, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 2 Comments
Only the actions of the just Smell sweet, and blossom in their dust.
James Shirley
| E |
North |
| E-W |
♠ J 9 8 6
♥ J 10 8 6
♦ 2
♣ A 9 6 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ 4 2
♥ 4
♦ 9 7 6 5
♣ K J 8 7 5 2 |
♠ 7 5
♥ A K 9 7 3 2
♦ A Q 10 4
♣ 10 |
| South |
♠ A K Q 10 3
♥ Q 5
♦ K J 8 3
♣ Q 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
1 ♥ |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
3 ♥* |
Dbl. |
| 4 ♠ |
All pass |
|
|
*Mixed raise (6-9 points and four trump)
♥4
Do not make the knee-jerk reaction of passing because you are weak, and partner has not shown extra values. Here you have more than enough for the simple raise to two spades, simply suggesting four trumps and 6-10 HCP. Your ace and singleton should be working overtime; as bad hands go, this is a good one.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ J 9 8 6
♥ J 10 8 6
♦ 2
♣ A 10 6 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
1 ♣ |
Pass |
| 1 ♥ |
Pass |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
July 31st, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 8 Comments
A thought is often original, though you have uttered it a hundred times.
Oliver Wendell Holmes
| S |
North |
| N-S |
♠ A 3
♥ 10 9 7 6 5
♦ 8 7 3 2
♣ K 9 |
| West |
East |
♠ J 8 7 6
♥ 8 3
♦ A J
♣ 10 8 7 4 3 |
♠ Q 10 9 4 2
♥ 4 2
♦ K Q 6 4
♣ A 6 |
| South |
♠ K 5
♥ A K Q J
♦ 10 9 5
♣ Q J 5 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
2 ♦* |
Pass |
| 2 ♥ |
Pass |
Pass |
2 ♠ |
| 3 ♥ |
3 ♠ |
4 ♥ |
All pass |
*Hearts
♠6
It might be right to raise hearts to the two-, three- or four-level. The problem with preempting here is that with a trick and a half on the side, you may be unnecessarily going minus against nothing, when your side had a safe heart contract (it would feel very different to me were the honors in the long suits). The fifth trump persuades me to make a limit raise to three hearts, rather than a simple raise to two.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A 3
♥ 10 9 7 6 5
♦ 8 7 3 2
♣ K 9 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♥ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
July 30th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 5 Comments
‘Ay, but you know we must return good for evil.’ ‘That may be a mistake in the translation.’
Sir John Vanbrugh
| W |
North |
| Both |
♠ 7 5 2
♥ 10 8 6 5
♦ A K J 4
♣ J 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ A Q 6 3
♥ 7
♦ 10 7 6
♣ A K Q 9 7 |
♠ J 10 9 4
♥ 4 3 2
♦ 9 8 5 3 2
♣ 10 |
| South |
♠ K 8
♥ A K Q J 9
♦ Q
♣ 8 6 5 3 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♣ |
Pass |
Pass |
| 1 ♥ |
1 ♠ |
3 ♦* |
Pass |
| 4 ♥ |
All pass |
|
|
*Fit-jump
♣K
A simple one today. Over your partner’s invitational jump to two no-trump you should continue by bidding three diamonds. This is forcing and suggests precisely this distribution, and lets partner decide what game is best for your side. It is a good rule of thumb that you cannot invite facing an invitation. The only way to stay low is to pass – which of course you would not consider here.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A Q 6 3
♥ 7
♦ 10 7 6
♣ A K Q 9 7 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♣ |
Pass |
1 ♦ |
Pass |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
2 NT |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
July 29th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 5 Comments
Worth seeing? Yes, but not worth going to see.
Samuel Johnson
| N |
North |
| N-S |
♠ 10 6
♥ A 9 8
♦ A K 10 8
♣ J 7 5 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ 3
♥ K Q J 6 3
♦ J 7 4 2
♣ A Q 10 |
♠ 8 7 5 4
♥ 10 7 4 2
♦ Q 9 6
♣ K 6 |
| South |
♠ A K Q J 9 2
♥ 5
♦ 5 3
♣ 9 8 3 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♦ |
Pass |
| 1 ♠ |
2 ♥ |
Pass |
Pass |
| 4 ♠ |
All pass |
|
|
♥K
The hand offers a slightly awkward rebid whether you open one club or one diamond, if your partner responds one spade – and no, you cannot bid diamonds then clubs, as this virtually guarantees 5-4 pattern. Nonetheless I would open one diamond, bidding where I live, to make sure that my partner gets the defense right if he happens to be on lead to trick one. When in doubt, bid good suits.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 10 6
♥ A 9 8
♦ A K 10 8
♣ J 7 5 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
@bid:? |
| |
|
|
|
July 28th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
A sight to make an old man young.
Lord Tennyson
| S |
North |
| Both |
♠ 7 4
♥ 9 7 5 2
♦ A J 6 2
♣ Q J 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q J 10 8 5 3
♥ 4
♦ 8 4
♣ A 10 8 2 |
♠ 9 6 2
♥ Q J 10 8 6 3
♦ K 9 5
♣ 9 |
| South |
♠ A K
♥ A K
♦ Q 10 7 3
♣ K 7 6 5 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♣ |
2 ♠ |
Pass |
Pass |
| 2 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♠Q
If facing a 15-17 notrump, I think it is clear that one should pass at any form of scoring bar teams, when vulnerable. Game does not rate to be better than 50 percent, so you surely don’t want to propel yourself too high while helping the opponents on lead. If vulnerable at teams, I could imagine bidding Stayman, but only if the red suits were switched.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 7 4
♥ 9 7 5 2
♦ A J 6 2
♣ Q J 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 NT |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
July 27th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 8 Comments
Fate is never fair. You are caught in a current much stronger than you are; struggle against it and you’ll drown not just yourself but those who try to save you. Swim with it, and you’ll survive.
Cassandra Clare
| W |
North |
| Both |
♠ K 10 9 5
♥ 10 3
♦ A K
♣ 9 7 6 4 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ 7 3
♥ Q 8 7 6 5
♦ 10 8 5 3 2
♣ 2 |
♠ 6 4
♥ K J 4 2
♦ Q J 6
♣ A Q J 10 |
| South |
♠ A Q J 8 2
♥ A 9
♦ 9 7 4
♣ K 8 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
Pass |
1 ♣ |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
2 ♣ |
Pass |
| 4 ♠ |
All pass |
|
|
♣2
With a potential stopper in each side-suit, you have reasonable hopes that if declarer has a second suit, it won’t run and if does you probably won’t beat the slam! That being said, leading from any honor might well give up your side’s trick in the suit. So even though passive leads are not nearly as effective against small slams as grand slams, I would lead a trump here.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ 9 6 2
♥ Q 6 4
♦ J 9 4 2
♣ Q 9 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
1 ♠ |
| Pass |
3 ♠ |
Pass |
6 ♠ |
| All pass |
|
|
|
July 26th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 12 Comments
|
I frequently find it hard to judge how far to compete with a little extra shape (or high cards). For example, holding: ♠ 9-4, ♥ J-10-8-7-2, ♦ Q-10-6-4, ♣ K-3 you hear partner open one diamond. You respond heart and when LHO doubles, partner raises to two hearts and RHO bids two spades. Would you bid three hearts at any or all vulnerabilities?
Jumping Jack, Cedar Rapids, Iowa
At all forms of scoring and vulnerability I would surely bid three hearts – the secondary fit means I can’t be seriously damaged in my contract. I think even if my minors were switched I would raise to three hearts, expecting to have nine trumps between us (or to be facing three decent hearts with some side shape). This sort of hand emphasizes that there is some merit to support doubles so that partner’s raise guarantees four trumps.
What convention(s) do you suggest for competing over enemy strong 1 NT opening bids? I’m trying to find the optimum combination of preempting the opponents and not going beyond our own safety level.
The Dark Knight, Augusta, Ga.
Of the simple defenses, Landy works fine by me, but in the last decade Meckwell and Woolsey have gained a lot of traction. Both methods let you bid on a lot of hands, which is the real aim of any convention while giving up the penalty double. A good discussion can be found here, along with how to counter the opponents’ intervention.
What rules would you impose on the appropriate shapes for opening a strong no-trump when within the high-card constraints? For example with: ♠ K-9-6-4, ♥ A-Q, ♦ A-J, ♣ Q-7-4-3-2 would you open one no-trump to protect the redsuit holdings, or would you bid one club?
Gub-Gub, Grand Forks, N.D.
I avoid opening one no-trump with a 5-4 pattern and a four- or five-card spade suit, since either way I have an easy rebid. I admit today’s hand is very close to the exception that proves the rule. With 5-4 shape I open my long suit unless I have a minimum for the call with five of a minor, plus a four-card red suit. With any 17count I prefer to reverse, or open a five-card major if I have one.
|
In your Sunday column with ♠ A-7-3-2, ♥ A-5-3, ♦ Q-9-5, ♣ A-4-2 after opening one club and hearing partner respond one heart, you wrote that you prefer a rebid of one no-trump. I have been taught that you should not pass up a four-card major at the one level because your partner will assume you do not have it and you will miss a 4-4 major fit. Have I been told wrong?
Gil by Association, Panama City, Fla.
I think that with this precise pattern you have discretion as to whether to bid spades or rebid one no-trump (a heart raise with this shape would be rare). With 4-3-2-4 or 4-2-3-4 shape I would normally rebid one spade, I agree. Here, though, the quality of my spades and my minors will influence whether I want to risk losing the spades or not.
Holding: ♠ 8-6-2, ♥ A-Q-J, ♦ A-K-9-7-4, ♣ Q-10 I heard my RHO open one club. Could you weigh up the choices for me — I assume pass is not one of them between a double, or a call of either one diamond, or one no-trump.
R2-D2, Saint John, New Brunswick
You must bid, and there are merits to all the three actions you describe. One diamond gets your long suit in but it makes it harder to show your extras. Double gets most of the values across but I’d rather have at least one four-card major. One no-trump is not so risky and you can always run to two diamonds I suppose, if doubled. Additionally, it does show your range nicely, so it gets my vote. They often don’t lead clubs when they should, on this auction.
|
July 25th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 9 Comments
Success is simple. Do what’s right, the right way, at the right time.
Arnold Glasgow
| S |
North |
| Both |
♠ 7
♥ A J 8 7
♦ K J 8 2
♣ Q 10 8 6 |
| West |
East |
♠ A Q 9 8 3
♥ 4
♦ 9 5
♣ A 7 4 3 2 |
♠ 4 2
♥ Q 9 3
♦ Q 10 7 3
♣ K J 9 5 |
| South |
♠ K J 10 6 5
♥ K 10 6 5 2
♦ A 6 4
♣ — |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
1 NT |
Pass |
| 2 ♥ |
Pass |
3 ♥ |
Pass |
| 4 ♥ |
All pass |
|
|
♦9
You are of course far too good to consider passing. Your real choice is whether to make a simple raise of diamonds, or to cuebid three clubs to suggest a better hand than the raise. This would be my choice because I have so few honors in clubs; facing a 5-5 hand type, my collection should produce a surprising number of tricks for my partner.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 7
♥ A J 8 7
♦ K J 8 2
♣ Q 10 8 6 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♣ |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
| 1 NT |
2 ♣ |
2 ♦ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
|
All the deals this week come from the summer nationals last year, held in Las Vegas in July 2014.
When Kit Woolsey gives you a deal he thinks might be interesting, you can assume it will offer more than most people’s challenges. So put yourself in four spades as South and see if you can match his logic.
At trick one, West leads the diamond jack to East’s king. Back comes a low trump and you have to plan the rest of the play.
It might seem like a blind guess as to whether to rise with the ace or finesse the queen, but look a little more closely at the position. When you are in a bad contract, look for a set of conditions that would allow you to make. When, as here, you are in a good contract, go to the other extreme and look at what lie of the cards might defeat you – then protect against that lie.
At trick two Woolsey put up the spade ace, calculating that the contract was in danger only if East had the club king. If that were so, he could infer that East would have short spades and a full opening bid if his hand included the spade king. So if he held that hand, he would have been favorite to have acted over North’s one heart response to show spades – either by doubling, or cuebidding one spade, perhaps.
Woolsey concluded that it must be right to rise with the ace – and so it proved.