May 19th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 10 Comments
In our plain defects, We already know the brotherhood of man.
Christopher Fry
| W |
North |
| Both |
♠ Q 8 6
♥ A 7 5
♦ A Q 5
♣ 9 7 4 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ 2
♥ J 9 8 3 2
♦ 8 6 2
♣ K Q J 6 |
♠ J 10 9 4
♥ 6
♦ J 9 7 3
♣ 10 8 5 3 |
| South |
♠ A K 7 5 3
♥ K Q 10 4
♦ K 10 4
♣ A |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
1 ♣ |
Pass |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
1 NT |
Pass |
| 3 ♥ |
Pass |
3 ♠ |
Pass |
| 4 NT |
Pass |
5 ♠* |
Pass |
| 6 ♠ |
All pass |
queen |
|
*Two key cards plus the trump
♣K
It is tempting to raise to three clubs, but my guess would be that I don’t have quite enough to invite game. A fifth club would make the raise far more attractive, or perhaps as little as an extra queen on the side. As it is, pass, and apologize if you have missed game.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 2
♥ J 9 8 3 2
♦ 8 6 2
♣ K Q J 6 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♠ |
Pass |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
2 ♣ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
May 18th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
‘Danger!’ said the old cob. ‘Danger! I welcome danger and adventure. Danger is my middle name.’
E. B. White
| N |
North |
| None |
♠ Q 8 6
♥ Q J 2
♦ A J 8 6
♣ K J 9 |
| West |
East |
♠ J 9 5
♥ K 7 3
♦ Q 2
♣ A 10 8 6 5 |
♠ 10 4 3 2
♥ 10 8 5 4
♦ 7 5 4
♣ Q 3 |
| South |
♠ A K 7
♥ A 9 6
♦ K 10 9 3
♣ 7 4 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♦ |
Pass |
| 3 NT |
All pass |
|
|
♣6
With your heart suit an unattractive one to lead from, the choice is whether to lead trumps or play for club ruffs. The opponents are known to be in a 5-3 or 4-4 fit (since partner’s double guarantees at least three spades), so leading a trump might mangle partner’s holding. And the possibility of club ruffs looks as good as any way to set up tricks for your side, so I would lead the club jack.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ 10 3
♥ A 10 8 6 5
♦ J 10 6 4
♣ J 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♦ |
Dbl. |
1 ♠ |
| 2 ♥ |
2 ♠ |
3 ♥ |
3 ♠ |
| All pass |
|
|
|
May 17th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 7 Comments
|
Last week at our club a question arose regarding an Alert. In a Flannery sequence does a response of two hearts or two spades require an Alert, on the grounds that those responses indicate no game interest? Many of our newer or non-Flannery players would be shut out of the auction, because of the lack of an Alert.
Level Pegging, Bellevue, Wash.
I believe no Alert is required. The bids are a natural suggestion of a place to play. In a bridge club you’d assume that either the opponents will know this, or be able to work it out. I’m no great fan of using conventions to bamboozle opponents, but we can’t spoon-feed everyone – just in case they aren’t paying attention. By contrast, a jump to three hearts or three spades, if weak, should be Alerted, since the alternative interpretation of forcing or invitational could easily be assumed here.
Recently one of my opponents mentioned Goldwater’s Rule after a bid out of turn. I didn’t understand the explanation – could you clarify it for me please.
Term Limits, Eau Claire, Wis.
Tournament Director Harry Goldwater produced a rule but it was for a lead out of turn not an insufficient call. He suggested that when a lead is made out of turn, you should accept it, on the grounds that anyone who cannot work out who is on lead, probably won’t know what to lead either.
Can you comment on the rebid problem here? I held:
♠ Q, ♥ K-9-7, ♦ K-Q-8-7-4, ♣ A-J-9-3. I opened one diamond and chose to rebid two clubs over my partner’s one spade response. When my partner raised to three clubs, would you pass or explore for game – or even up and bid three no-trump? My partner had stretched with an eight-count and five clubs, so no game was good.
Third Time Lucky, Durango, Colo.
Your soft cards strongly suggest five clubs is not going to make, so the question is how much you need to go looking for no-trump. I would feel far happier with the diamond 10 instead of the four. As it is I would pass reluctantly, expecting neither of our side-suits would set up easily, even if we overcame a weakness in hearts.
|
I read your column daily in Spokane’s Spokesman Review. In a column around two years ago, you responded to a reader’s request for recommendation for a book for beginners. You recommended two books as I recall. I cut out the article, planned to order at least one of the books, but lost the page I had cut out. I would like to read up on a little bit before I join a bridge group of some kind — hopefully at my skill level.
Johnny on the Spot, Spokane, Wash.
Here are some suggestions: Planning the Play of a Bridge Hand, by Barbara Seagram & David Bird, or Bridge for Dummies by Eddie Kantar. And the Audrey Grant series for ACBL are all excellent.
I was dealt ♠ J-9, ♥ Q-7-3-2, ♦ A-10-8-6-4, ♣ K-7 and heard my LHO open one heart, over which my partner overcalled one spade. Now came two clubs on my right. Was I supposed to bid at all – and if so what would you recommend? I chose to raise spades treating my doubleton as the equivalent of three small trumps. Was this reasonable?
Advance with Care, Albuquerque, N.M.
In this seat some play fourth-suit doubles here (also called snapdragon or competitive doubles). This would show good but not great diamonds, together with spade tolerance, and values. The same principle would apply if your RHO had raised hearts as opposed to bidding a new suit. Double would be take-out and value-showing.
|
May 16th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 2 Comments
The blazing evidence of immortality is our dissatisfaction with any other solution.
Ralph Waldo Emerson
| North |
North |
| North-South |
♠ K Q 9
♥ A K
♦ Q J 7 6
♣ A Q J 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ 8 7 4 3 2
♥ 6 2
♦ K 10 9 8 5 4
♣ — |
♠ A J 10 6 5
♥ J 4
♦ A
♣ K 10 7 6 3 |
| South |
♠ —
♥ Q 10 9 8 7 5 3
♦ 3 2
♣ 9 8 5 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
2 ♣ |
2 ♦ * |
| Pass |
3 ♣ |
Dbl. |
5 ♣ |
| 5 ♥ |
All pass |
|
|
* Hearts or the black suits
♠8
These days Leaping Michaels is a popular treatment after your opponents open with a weak two bid. Here a jump to four clubs would show clubs and a major – which would seem ideal. However you need a better hand than this to take the action. A simple call of two spades (hoping to get another chance) is the most sensible course of action.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A J 10 6 5
♥ J 4
♦ A
♣ K 10 7 6 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
2 ♦ |
| ? |
|
|
|
May 15th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 20 Comments
The Mind of Man My haunt, and the main region of my song.
William Wordsworth
| East |
North |
| Both |
♠ J 9 8 ♥ A 7 ♦ A K 10 3 ♣ 10 7 6 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ 7 4 3 ♥ J 9 8 5 4 2 ♦ 6 2 ♣ K 3 |
♠ — ♥ 10 6 ♦ Q 8 5 4 ♣ A Q J 9 8 5 2 |
| South |
♠ A K Q 10 6 5 2 ♥ K Q 3 ♦ J 9 7 ♣ — |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
3 ♣ |
| 4 ♠ |
Pass |
5 ♦ |
Pass |
| 6 ♣ |
Pass |
6 ♦ |
Pass |
| 7 ♠ |
All pass |
|
|
♥5
The underlying message from this auction will not be agreed by everyone, but I believe that at this point in the auction one should not try to improve the partscore. With a bad hand, one passes three clubs and hopes for the best. A call of three hearts here is natural suggesting extra hearts and not a complete bust, and seems the right call now.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 7 4 3 ♥ J 9 8 5 4 2 ♦ 6 2 ♣ K 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♠ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| 2 ♥ |
Pass |
3 ♣ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
May 14th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 14 Comments
One has not only an ability to perceive the world but an ability to alter one’s perception of it; more simply, one can change things by the manner in which one looks at them.
Tom Robbins
| South |
North |
| Neither |
♠ J 5
♥ J 9 4
♦ Q 4 3
♣ A Q 7 5 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ 10 7 3
♥ Q 6 2
♦ A 9 8
♣ 10 8 4 2 |
♠ A 9 8 4
♥ A 8 5 3
♦ 10 5 2
♣ J 6 |
| South |
♠ K Q 6 2
♥ K 10 7
♦ K J 7 6
♣ K 9 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♣2
While you have a maximum for your initial call, you have no clear way forward, and it seems like a breach of the law of total tricks to advance to the three-level with only three-card support. A three-club call here would suggest six, and a hand suited to offense than this, but it may be the least lie. Double would be penalty here, by the way, and pass could easily work out here.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ J 5
♥ J 9 4
♦ Q 4 3
♣ A Q 7 5 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♥ |
Pass |
| 2 ♥ |
Pass |
Pass |
2 ♠ |
| ? |
|
|
|
May 13th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 15 Comments
Better the day, better the deed.
Thomas Middleton
| South |
North |
| North-South |
♠ A K 10
♥ A 10 3
♦ A 6 4 3
♣ K J 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ 5 2
♥ Q 9 8 6 2
♦ Q 10 9 8
♣ 8 4 |
♠ J 8 3
♥ J
♦ K J 7 5
♣ 10 9 7 6 5 |
| South |
♠ Q 9 7 6 4
♥ K 7 5 4
♦ 2
♣ A Q 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
2 ♣ |
Pass |
| 2 ♥ |
Pass |
3 ♦ |
Pass |
| 4 ♣ |
Pass |
4 ♦ |
Pass |
| 5 ♣ |
Pass |
6 ♠ |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♣8
It is very tempting to raise partner; after all one is always told to support with support. Here I’m dubious as to whether this is right, as your whole hand is defense to diamonds, and your partner may picture a more offensively oriented hand than this. Nonetheless I will raise, with misgivings. With the spade 10 instead of the jack, I pass.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ J 8 3
♥ J
♦ K J 7 5
♣ 10 9 7 6 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| Pass |
Pass |
1 ♠ |
2 ♦ |
| ? |
|
|
|
May 12th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
It’s sometimes funny to watch some people doing something the wrong way but doing it confidently. Even more funny, they succeeded.
Toby Beta
| South |
North |
| Both |
♠ 4 3
♥ K J 9 8 4
♦ 3
♣ A J 8 6 5 |
| West |
East |
♠ J
♥ 5 3 2
♦ K 8 7 5 4
♣ K 7 3 2 |
♠ A K 8
♥ Q 10 6
♦ Q 10 9 6 2
♣ 10 9 |
| South |
♠ Q 10 9 7 6 5 2
♥ A 7
♦ A J
♣ Q 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
1 NT |
Pass |
| 3 ♠ |
Pass |
4 ♠ |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♦5
My best guess would be to bid four hearts – which is what you were surely intending to bid had East passed. Once in a while hands like this produce lots of tricks on offense, but declarer can run the diamond suit in one no-trump doubled. So I would be reluctant to try to defend here. And if East is playing silly games, let him try and sort that out at the five-level on the next round.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 4 3
♥ K J 9 8 4
♦ 3
♣ A J 8 6 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♦ |
Dbl. |
1 NT |
| ? |
|
|
|
May 11th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
The remedy is worse than the disease.
Francs Bacon
| South |
North |
| East-West |
♠ A Q 5
♥ J 9 5
♦ 5 2
♣ K Q 10 7 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ 8 4 3
♥ K 8 4
♦ K Q J 10 3
♣ 9 2 |
♠ 7 2
♥ Q 10 7 2
♦ 9 8 7 4
♣ A 5 3 |
| South |
♠ K J 10 9 6
♥ A 6 3
♦ A 6
♣ J 8 6 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
2 ♣ |
Pass |
| 2 ♠ |
Pass |
4 ♠ |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♦K
Although there are unlikely scenarios in which a top diamond could be right, if declarer is threatening to build the hearts or spades for a discard, I suspect a diamond will cost more often than it would gain. Put me down for a mundane small heart lead – and not the heart seven or nine under any circumstances.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 10 3 2
♥ 9 7 4
♦ K Q 10 3
♣ 8 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
3 ♥ |
5 ♣ |
| All pass |
|
|
|
May 10th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 10 Comments
|
In third chair I held: ♠ Q-10-5-3, ♥ J-7-5, ♦ K-5, ♣ K-J-7-3, and heard my partner open one heart. Can you comment on the merits of the direct raise, a response of one spade, or starting out with a response of one no-trump.
Mixing it up, Memphis, Tenn.
If you use the direct raise to two hearts as constructive, with a one no-trump response as forcing, I’d raise directly. Try not to jump raise (either immediately or at the second turn) with a mundane 10-count – which this surely is. I would not respond one spade unless I planned to jump to three hearts facing my partner’s response. And I’d try to have good spades for that auction if I did.
Is Drury the answer to all problems when facing a potentially light third-in-hand opener? Is there not the risk of losing the club suit as a passed hand?
Gumboots, Rockford, Ill.
Drury (the passed hand response of two clubs to a majorsuit opening showing a maximum pass, and a fit) has many plusses. It keeps you low on occasions, and lets you explore the right game efficiently. You minimize the risk you describe if you stretch to open one club with 11 points and six clubs in first or second chair. With fewer points, pass, then respond one no-trump (or three clubs if necessary).
My partner and I disagreed over a recent hand. I had: ♠ A-J-5-2, ♥ 10-8-7-5-4, ♦ Q-2, ♣ J-4, when you hear your partner open one no-trump? I chose to use Stayman and pass the response of two spades, judging that I had improved the contract already. Nine tricks were the limit on the hand, but my partner said I owed him a bid. Any thoughts?
Head Cook, West Palm Beach, Fla.
I would use Stayman as you did, planning to bid two no-trump over a two diamond response. But I would have raised two spades to three, and would have raised a two heart response to game – so I feel you did not do enough, irrespective of the result actually achieved on this hand.
|
I play the rule of 15 to decide whether to open a fourth hand (adding my HCP points to the number of spades I hold.) A person I respect says I should have 16 pts. How many points do your recommend?
Pearson Pointer, Vancouver, British Columbia
Don’t be guided by that rule alone. With 13 or more HCP open, and don’t worry about such issues. With 11-12, look at your controls and ease of rebid. Consider the vulnerability (always open unfavorable, since neither opponent bid when they had the chance, and partner might pass 11-12 hands in 2nd). At favorable be more discreet – partner didn’t open when he might have done! Certainly use 15 not 16 as the guideline. You paid your entry fee; bid when you can.
When considering whether to open two no-trump, should you be put off by holding a weak doubleton? I assume a five-card major is not a serious drawback, but what about a five-card minor AND a four-card major? I recently held: ♠ A-Q-7-3, ♥ 9-5, ♦ A-Q-J-7-5, ♣ A-K, and elected to open one diamond. My partner disagreed with my perception of the hand’s flaws for an opening of two notrump. What do you think?
Lincoln Lawyer, Riverside, Calif.
I agree with you that opening two no-trump unnecessarily preempts yourself when you have an easy and far more descriptive route available, namely to open one diamond and then to jump or reverse into spades. Sometimes one settles for a two no-trump opening when all the alternatives are more seriously flawed, but not today.
|
|
A small slam on the North and South cards looks a good proposition; indeed, on a good day all 13 tricks might well roll in. But the battle today was to find the safest route to 12 tricks.
During the auction, South had shown slam interest and a twosuiter at his second turn, then had used Keycard Blackwood to make sure the spades were robust enough to play slam. After winning the club lead, declarer played the spade ace then queen, to discover there was an inevitable trump loser. Now all South needed to guard against losing a heart as well. The key was to prevent East being able to ruff a heart winner then remove dummy’s last trump. South worked out that so long as East held at least one card in hearts, he was likely to be able to achieve his target.
At trick four South cashed the heart ace, then led a low heart towards his hand. East could see that if he ruffed a loser he would be wasting his trump trick to no effect, so he discarded a club. South won with the king in hand, returned to dummy in diamonds and played another heart. Still unable to ruff profitably, East discarded yet again, and South’s heart queen held.
Now came the heart 10, ruffed with dummy’s last trump. East could overruff, but that was the only trick for the defense. In essence, South had combined his heart loser and trump loser on the same trick.