Aces on Bridge — Daily Columns

The Aces on Bridge: Tuesday, June 30th, 2015

Our brightest blazes of gladness are commonly kindled by unexpected sparks.

Samuel Johnson


S North
Both ♠ 9 5 3
♥ A 5 3
♦ 9 4 2
♣ Q 5 3 2
West East
♠ Q J 10 8
♥ 10 9 7 2
♦ K 3
♣ 8 6 4
♠ 7 6 4 2
♥ J 8 6
♦ Q 7 6 5
♣ 10 9
South
♠ A K
♥ K Q 4
♦ A J 10 8
♣ A K J 7
South West North East
2 ♣ Pass 2 ♦ Pass
3 NT Pass 6 NT All pass
       

♠Q

In today’s deal the optimal contract is six clubs, but it is often hard to locate a 4-4 fit when the auction gets high in a hurry. After North-South had a quantitative auction, it proved impossible to find their minor-suit fit.

When West led the spade queen against the slam, declarer could see that his route to 12 tricks involved getting three tricks from the diamond suit, and to do so he needed to take three finesses in the suit. As this required three entries, declarer played the club ace and king at tricks two and three. Then he took the club jack and played a fourth club to dummy’s queen.

Next he led a diamond to his jack and West’s king. He won the spade return and crossed back to dummy by leading to the heart ace. This was the entry to dummy to run the diamond nine, and he could remain in dummy for the third diamond finesse. In the end, declarer took two spades, three hearts, three diamonds and four clubs.

As an aside, note the effect of West ducking the first diamond. Wouldn’t declarer now have considered crossing to dummy to repeat the diamond finesse? When West produced the king and diamonds broke 4-2 South would have had a cardiac arrest. (For the record, declarer could lead a low diamond from hand after the first finesse succeeds, planning a later finesse – but that might lose out if West had ducked from an original holding of king-third or king-fourth.)


It feels right to reject the game-try – you are at the very minimum of your one no-trump response. The only question is whether to retreat to three clubs, and I say no. Your partner’s auction is entirely consistent with a balanced 18-count, with only three clubs. (Switch your minors, and had partner opened one diamond, then reverting to three diamonds with four-card support would be far more attractive).

BID WITH THE ACES

♠ 9 5 3
♥ A 5 3
♦ 9 4 2
♣ Q 5 3 2
South West North East
  Pass 1 ♣ Pass
1 NT Pass 2 NT Pass
?      

For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog. Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2015. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Monday, June 29th, 2015

There are no second chances in life, except to feel remorse.

Carlos Ruiz Zafon


East North
None ♠ K J 2
♥ A J 5
♦ 7 2
♣ 8 6 4 3 2
West East
♠ 6 5 4 3
♥ 4 2
♦ Q J 10 9
♣ J 9 7
♠ A Q 10 7
♥ 8 6 3
♦ A 8 6 5 3
♣ K
South
♠ 9 8
♥ K Q 10 9 7
♦ K 4
♣ A Q 10 5
South West North East
      1 ♦
1 ♥ Pass 2 ♥ Pass
3 ♣ Pass 4 ♥ All pass

♦Q

Would you make a try on the South cards after your partner had raised your major-suit opening? And would it matter if you had overcalled one heart and been raised to two?

Curiously, although the diamond king has become a more useful asset when you hear an opening bid of one diamond to your right, I’m not sure I would try again after partner had only raised my overcall to two. The fact that he had not produced a cue-bid raise might suggest game is unlikely to be more than a long shot.

Today, however, your game-try leads to your reaching a slightly pushy four hearts, against which West leads the diamond queen to East’s ace. East returns the club king. Plan the play.

If you win the club ace and find the king to be a singleton, you can be sure West will later get in with the club jack and switch to a spade, through dummy’s king-jack. But duck the club king, and you guarantee your side 10 tricks: one diamond, five hearts and four clubs. That is the winning play today.

Incidentally, while a spade lead would have beaten your game outright, can you see how the defenders could still have prevailed, even after the normal lead of the diamond queen? East simply ducks the opening lead and lets West win the next diamond to find the killing shift. Should East find this defense? I think so. West cannot have five diamonds, or he would have raised pre-emptively at his first turn.


Today’s problem comes from “Larry Teaches Opening Leads,” a new book by Larry Cohen. He advises that even though your clubs and hearts are better than your diamonds, you should lead the unbid suit when in doubt, as you certainly are here. This is good advice; declarer might easily have only one diamond stopper.

LEAD WITH THE ACES

♠ 3
♥ Q 5 4 3
♦ J 7 6 5
♣ K 9 3 2
South West North East
    Pass 1 ♠
Pass 2 ♥ Pass 2 ♠
Pass 3 ♣ Pass 3 NT
All pass      

For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog. Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2015. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Sunday, June 28th, 2015

During the auction, are you allowed (or even supposed) to use the terms: “Alert, Skip Bid, Transfer, Jump shift” and so on. I would like to be proven right or wrong so as not to continue this haranguing with my opponents! I have researched the printed word and searched the internet, but cannot find a definitive answer.

Baby Ruth, Troy, N.Y.

These words are not only legal but best practice. Stop (skip) bids are to prevent your LHO pausing too much or too little, thus tipping his partner off to his strength. If you MUST pause with both a flat four- or 14-count, your partner will be able to do what he pleases. An alert tells your opponents (not partner) that a call is conventional. If they wrongly think it is natural, they might be damaged. ‘Transfer’ is a small variant on the alert procedure; it applies to bids in response to a no-trump opening. The only required announcements are ‘skip’, ‘transfer’, ‘alert’ and ‘forcing’ for the response to the major, not ‘Jump Shift’.

As the proliferation of cuebids grows on my convention card, I’m seeking to find the best way to explain what an unassuming cuebid is and what the call has to be modest about!

Winston Smith, Sioux Falls, S.D.

The reason the call is so named is that facing an overcall, a cuebid by his partner shows a fit, and at least limit raise values. But it in no way promises any control (either high-card or shortage) in the opponent’s suit. Conversely, a jump raise of an overcalled suit now becomes much more about shape than high cards.

I was just reading a column last week where a player had a strong balanced hand in fourth chair when a one diamond call came round to him. With 17 points, why not simply bid one no-trump to avoid wrong-siding a major suit, as actually happened here?

Lip Smacker, Tucson, Ariz.

The range for the balancing no-trump is typically a good 10-15 points, so unless by agreement this call shows a weaker hand not a stronger one. One hopes to double and bid no-trump to show the extras; if you don’t play this style, you risk being closed out of the auction when you and your partner each hold balanced minimum opening bids.

I was thinking about going to Chicago in August to the US Nationals there, to try and get my first platinum points. However I see no way of entering any event with platinum points. Am I missing something?

Trophy Hunter, Newark, N.J.

My reading of the ACBL’s 2015 summer tournament schedule suggests that the bold upper-case events (the LM pairs, open pairs and fast pairs) do have platinum points I think. You can enter the second two events even if not a life master.

Earlier this week I had six hearts to the king-jack, and four spades to the ace-queen. I elected to pass in second seat (would you?). My partner opened a minor in fourth seat and rebid one no-trump over one heart, but passed my invitation to three hearts. Did I undercook the deal – since a favorable break gave me play for 12 tricks facing the minor-suit aces and the spade king?

Low-ball, Edmonton, Alberta

The initial pass is not my style though I understand it. Without the side four-card suit I might just invite game on your auction. But the extra playing strength and the well-placed honors makes it sensible to drive to game (perhaps in hearts if partner doesn’t admit to holding four spades).


For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog. Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2015. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Saturday, June 27th, 2015

Inspiration is the windfall from hard work and focus. Muses are too unreliable to keep on the payroll.

Helene Hanson


W North
E-W ♠ 10 6 3
♥ A 9 8 7
♦ K Q
♣ K 10 6 4
West East
♠ Q J 7 2
♥ K 3
♦ 9 8 7 5 4
♣ 9 8
♠ K 4
♥ J 10 5 4 2
♦ 10 3
♣ A J 7 5
South
♠ A 9 8 5
♥ Q 6
♦ A J 6 2
♣ Q 3 2
South West North East
  Pass 1 ♣ 1 ♥
Dbl. Pass 1 ♠ Pass
2 ♥ Dbl. Rdbl. Pass
3 NT All pass    

♥K

In today’s deal, our final one from last year’s European Championships, Michael Kalita of Poland was declarer in three notrump. He ducked the opening lead of the heart king, then won the next heart in hand.

Now he made his best play (in abstract) in the club suit though not the best play on the hand, when he crossed to a diamond in dummy to lead a club to the queen and a club to the 10 and jack.

Bauke Muller as East now needed to cash the club ace and play a spade, hoping declarer could no longer untangle his entries, as would be the case here. In fact Muller played the heart jack without cashing the club ace. Now declarer should have succeeded, had he pitched his club loser from hand, unblocking diamonds, and then built an additional spade winner for the ninth trick.

Notice the difference if Kalita does not cross to a diamond in dummy, but simply leads the club queen from hand at trick three. Muller can duck, and win the next club, but if he cashes the club ace then declarer will catch West sooner or later in a spade/diamond squeeze. Kalita can duck a shift to the spade king, win the next spade, then cross to a diamond winner in dummy to play off the heart and club winners, and West must succumb.

So can three no-trump be defeated? Yes, but the only lead to set the hand by force is a highly unlikely club.


Reluctantly, I would force this hand to game – as 12-counts with four-card support go, this is clearly not one of the more attractive ones. To set up the game-force, bid two spades, the fourth suit. This asks partner to describe their hand, and you plan to raise clubs at your next turn if space permits.

BID WITH THE ACES

♠ 10 6 3
♥ A 9 8 7
♦ K Q
♣ K 10 6 4
South West North East
  Pass 1 ♦ Pass
1 ♥ Pass 2 ♣ Pass
?      

For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog. Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2015. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Friday, June 26th, 2015

Once you hear the details of victory, it is hard to distinguish it from a defeat.

Jean-Paul Sartre


S North
E-W ♠ 10 8 6 3
♥ A Q 10
♦ Q 6 3 2
♣ 6 3
West East
♠ Q 7 4 2
♥ J 9 6 2
♦ 10
♣ K J 9 4
♠ 5
♥ K 8 7 5 3
♦ K 4
♣ A Q 10 8 5
South
♠ A K J 9
♥ 4
♦ A J 9 8 7 5
♣ 7 2
South West North East
1 ♦ Pass 1 ♠ 2 NT
4 ♠ 4 NT 5 ♦ Dbl.
All pass      

♠2

When Netherlands played Poland in the European Championships last summer, the Poles snatched defeat from the jaws of victory in both rooms here. They defended four spades by North in one room on a heart lead, letting declarer pitch a club loser immediately. Next declarer cashed the top spades and gave up a club. West went in with the jack and played queen and another spade, and declarer unblocked the spade jack to win the trump in hand.

Now North needed only to take the diamond finesse to bring home her game. But she led low to the ace and was down four for -200. Better defense would have been for West to win the club at trick five and lead a heart to force dummy to ruff. Now declarer would have stood no chance.

In our featured room the Dutch South, Meike Wortel, played five diamonds doubled. Had West led either of her side’s suits she would have defeated the game, but she led a spade, interpreting her partner’s double of five diamonds as showing a spade void.

Wortel put up dummy’s 10, led a diamond to the jack, then cashed the ace. Next came a top spade followed by a heart to the ace and a heart ruff, a diamond to the queen and a second heart ruff.

Now she exited with a club and, after taking two tricks there, whichever defender was on lead was endplayed, East to give a ruff and discard, West to choose between that and leading into the spade tenace.


Your additional shape makes this well worth a jump to three spades. But do not be carried away into doing more; if your partner cannot raise to game now, you will surely not take 10 tricks. Worse, if you do jump to the four-level, you may find your partner taking you too seriously. Just for the record, with the diamond five the king, I would bid four diamonds to show this pattern in diamonds and spades.

BID WITH THE ACES

♠ A K J 9
♥ 4
♦ A J 9 8 7 5
♣ 7 2
South West North East
1 ♦ Pass 1 ♠ Pass
?      

For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog. Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2015. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Thursday, June 25th, 2015

Nothing so completely baffles one who is full of trick and duplicity himself, than straightforward and simple integrity in another.

Charles Caleb Colton


W North
Both ♠ K Q 7
♥ A K 10 8 4 3
♦ 5
♣ K 4 2
West East
♠ 9 8 4 3 2
♥ Q 2
♦ A 6 2
♣ Q 9 7
♠ J 6 5
♥ 9 7 6 5
♦ 10 7
♣ A J 6 3
South
♠ A 10
♥ J
♦ K Q J 9 8 4 3
♣ 10 8 5
South West North East
  Pass 1 ♥ Pass
2 ♦ Pass 2 ♥ Pass
2 NT Pass 3 NT All pass
       

♠8

My favorite play problem from the European Championships in Croatia last year presented itself in match 10 of the Open and Women’s qualifying. Let’s say you find yourself as declarer in three no-trump after an auction where your side has bid only the red suits. You receive the lead of the spade eight (second and fourth), put up the queen, and play on diamonds. West wins and shifts smoothly to the club queen. Should you cover or duck?

In one match the Irish declarer ducked, and a club was continued. Down one. The Austrian declarer covered with the king, and this lost to the ace. Back came a low club and declarer was faced with her second guess, and she put in the eight. Both declarers sank like a stone.

The commentators believed that after the shift to the club queen, declarer should cover (this loses by force only when West has eschewed a lead from QJ9 of clubs at trick one). When the club king loses to the ace and a club comes back, declarer should perhaps employ a form of restricted choice – though one that may be applicable only against top-class defenders.

Playing the eight wins against an original holding in West of QJ7, but loses to honor-nine-seven – whether that honor is the jack or queen. So the 10 is probably the winning play both in theory and practice.

Jet Pasman and Nevena Senior were two of the other successful defenders who found the shift to the club queen.


There are several sensible choices. You are too good to rebid two hearts, so the choice is to bid three hearts (burying the spade fit) to raise to two or three spades – both of which somewhat overstate the spade support — or to bid two clubs, as a temporizing move, though one that rarely works for me. No action is perfect, but maybe a jump raise to three spades is less of a lie than a three-heart rebid.

BID WITH THE ACES

♠ K Q 7
♥ A K 10 8 4 3
♦ 5
♣ K 4 2
South West North East
1 ♥ Pass 1 ♠ Pass
?      

For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog. Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2015. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Wednesday, June 24th, 2015

The thought of suicide is a great consolation: by means of it one gets through many a dark night.

Friedrich Nietzsche


W North
N-S ♠ K Q 5
♥ A J
♦ K 5
♣ K Q 9 7 6 5
West East
♠ 10 9 8 3
♥ 9
♦ Q J 10 9 8 4 3
♣ 4
♠ A J 4 2
♥ Q 6 5 4 3
♦ A 7
♣ 8 3
South
♠ 7 6
♥ K 10 8 7 2
♦ 6 2
♣ A J 10 2
South West North East
  4 ♦ Dbl. Pass
4 ♥ All pass    

♣4

On this deal from round seven of the European Championships in Croatia last summer, England’s David Gold demonstrated that suicide at the bridge table can be very painful indeed.

The Israeli East-West pair had saved in five diamonds doubled for down one, but England defended four hearts. West selected the club four as his opening lead, putting declarer, Alon Birman, in with a shout.

He won with the ace, crossed to the heart ace and then correctly overtook the heart jack with the king. When West discarded the diamond three, declarer continued with the heart 10, West pitching another diamond, dummy reluctantly discarding the club five.

Gold correctly ducked this trick; not an obvious play. When declarer continued with the heart eight, West pitched the diamond queen and declarer threw the spade five from dummy. Gold calmly took this and returned his remaining trump.

What could declarer spare from dummy now? The only option was a second club, and now his 10th trick had vanished. Declarer ran his three remaining club winners but now needed to establish a diamond trick. If the diamonds were 7-2 with the ace right, then the defenders could simply duck the first diamond and run the suit when in with the spade ace. If they were 8-1, Gold would have taken a diamond ruff earlier; so declarer played for his only legitimate chance when he ducked the first diamond, hoping East had the bare ace. Alas for him, that was not the case, and England had plus 100 in each room.


It is tempting to jump in clubs, but this is not what your hand is about. You have too much outside strength and your club spots are feeble (on a bad day you might go down in three clubs while having a play for three no-trump). The real choice is whether to jump to two no-trump or three no-trump. The latter strongly suggests long clubs, so it would be my choice, since it also facilitates reaching six clubs.

BID WITH THE ACES

♠ K Q 5
♥ A J
♦ K 5
♣ K Q 9 7 6 5
South West North East
1 ♣ Pass 1 ♦ Pass
?      

For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog. Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2015. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Tuesday, June 23rd, 2015

To be prepared for war is one of the most effectual means of preserving peace.

George Washington


N North
E-W ♠ K Q 10 4
♥ A K 9 6
♦ Q 9 8 7
♣ A
West East
♠ A 7 5
♥ J 2
♦ J 3 2
♣ Q J 8 7 3
♠ J 9 8 2
♥ Q 7 4
♦ K 10 6 5
♣ K 6
South
♠ 6 3
♥ 10 8 5 3
♦ A 4
♣ 10 9 5 4 2
South West North East
    1 ♦ Pass
1 ♥ Pass 2 NT* Pass
3 ♦** Pass 4 ♥ All pass

*Various strong hands

**Weak

♣Q

Roy Welland was once a regular in contention for the US International team – he lost the finals of three consecutive US team trials. But he now spends much time in Germany and in partnership with Sabine Auken he has recently made it on to the German team that qualified in Opatija last year for the 2015 Bermuda Bowl. Roy has a talent for the unorthodox in the auction, but is no mean card-player either, and he demonstrated it in today’s deal.

After a light but entirely understandable response of one heart to his partner’s one diamond opening bid, Welland found himself in four hearts on a top club lead. He won, played the spade king to the ace, won the low heart return in dummy and played the diamond ace and guessed well when he led a diamond to the eight. He had correctly assumed that West would not be able to bring himself to duck the king. East won the diamond 10 and exited with the club king. Welland ruffed in dummy, then played the diamond queen, covered by the king and ruffed, to bring down the jack.

He next led a trump to dummy, and, trusting the opponents’ count card in spades, he reconstructed the West hand to have a 3=2=3=5 original distribution.

Accordingly, he next cashed the diamond nine to pitch his spade, ruffed a spade to hand, and ruffed a club to dummy. To prevent this trick representing declarer’s 10th winner, East had to overruff, but he then had to lead a spade into dummy’s tenace, to concede the contract.


There are two sensible answers here, the first being to make a splinter-jump to four clubs, for which you are technically in range. The problem here is your weak diamonds and club ace – you would surely be worth that action if your ace were in diamonds not clubs. The simple pessimistic action, which I prefer, is just to jump to four hearts. Don’t be amazed if partner can’t make it!

BID WITH THE ACES

♠ K Q 10 4
♥ A K 9 6
♦ Q 9 8 7
♣ A
South West North East
    Pass Pass
1 ♦ Pass 1 ♥ Pass
?      

For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog. Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2015. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Monday, June 22nd, 2015

We’re all islands shouting lies to each other across seas of misunderstanding.

Rudyard Kipling


S North
None ♠ A J 8 7 5
♥ 3
♦ A 10 8 7
♣ J 9 3
West East
♠ Q 4
♥ K 10 7 6 5 2
♦ Q J 6
♣ K 7
♠ 10 6 3 2
♥ A 9
♦ 5 4
♣ Q 10 8 6 2
South
♠ K 9
♥ Q J 8 4
♦ K 9 3 2
♣ A 5 4
South West North East
1 ♦ 2 ♥ 2 ♠ Pass
2 NT Pass 3 ♦ Pass
3 NT All pass    

♠Q

Since the European Open Championships start next week in Tromso, we shall be looking at some entertaining deals from last year’s European Championships, in Croatia.

The problem in today’s auction came when declarer, Tihana Brkljacic, thought the rebid of three diamonds was game-forcing, while North intended it as invitational. There were a number of missed opportunities for the defense in defending three no-trump, but the trick is to take advantage of your opponents’ errors.

West led the spade queen, so declarer won her king and ran the spade nine round to East’s 10. A club switch would have put paid to declarer’s chances but, East could hardly be blamed for switching to ace and another heart, to the queen and king.

West should have ducked the second heart, but having won her heart king, she realized that she could not afford to continue the suit. Rightly assuming that declarer held the diamond king for her opening bid, West placed her partner with the club queen and duly switched to the club king.

South now won her club ace and crossed to the diamond ace to cash her three spade winners, discarding a diamond and two clubs from hand. Forced to come down to four cards, West was squeezed out of her remaining club, so could no longer get to her partner’s club winners. At this point declarer could lead a diamond to her king, and exit with her last diamond. That endplayed West to lead into the jack-eight of hearts at trick 12, to concede the contract.


Your opponents seem well prepared for a heart lead against the slam (why else would East raise to six so dramatically?). With no particular reason in mind I’m going to guess to lead spades, perhaps with the idea that if I can force declarer to ruff, maybe the bad club break will cause him some problems.

LEAD WITH THE ACES

♠ Q 9 6 4
♥ 9 6 2
♦ 8 7
♣ J 8 5 4
South West North East
    Pass 1 ♣
Pass 1 ♠ Pass 2 ♦
Pass 3 ♦ Pass 6 ♦
All pass      

For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog. Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2015. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Sunday, June 21st, 2015

My partner held the following hand: ♠ A-9-8-3, ♥ Q-10-9-2, ♦ K-10-9-3, ♣ 5 when he heard me open one heart. Was he worth a limit raise, or a jump to game? His choice of inviting game with a simple raise saw me pass with a flat 12-count, but I made five.

Spirit-level, Willoughby, Ohio

The hand is definitely worth a raise to game — you might not always make it, but you’d want to be there facing any normal opening bid. The question is whether instead to make a splinter-raise to four clubs; I might not do that, but a lot depends on how much you play a splinter-bid promises here. Having a way to show a limited splinter-bid, or a constructive raise from one to four is very useful (though by no means essential).

When my opponents lead from the wrong hand at the first trick what are my options?

Straight Arrow, Harrisburg, Pa.

The first thing to do is to call the director if playing at a club. Having said that, the options are to allow the lead to be made and continue play to trick one, with dummy going down and playing fourth to the trick. Or you can either prevent the suit from being played until the true leader has lost the lead, insist on the suit being led, or even ask that the exposed card be played at its first legal opportunity, while allowing the real leader do what he or she likes.

I’m somewhat hazy on the true meaning of the term “Responsive double”. Could you clarify for me whether such doubles are primarily for take-out or penalties or true optional doubles?

Pirate Jack, Bellingham, Wash.

The simplest version of a responsive double comes when your LHO opens the bidding. If your partner doubles, and RHO raises the suit, a double by you would be takeout. Note that should RHO bid a new suit, then double by you would be penalty not take-out. The responsive take-out double of a raised minor normally suggests both majors, while the double of hearts normally denies spades, since you would bid them if you could. In my view a responsive double of spades neither promises nor denies hearts.

I’m not clear about how to act after intervention to my partner’s two club opening. My hand was: ♠ J-10-3-2, ♥ Q-6, ♦ J-10-8-6-4, ♣ K-9 and I heard my partner open two clubs and the next player bid three clubs. Is it right to bid three diamonds, and if not, what action would you recommend?

Unsuitable, Dodge City, Kan.

I’d recommend a simple style here where double is any weak hand, with a pass showing something like 5-8 points. In your example I’d pass here; but give me the diamond king instead of the club king and I’d bid three diamonds, because I’d feel this might be my last chance to introduce the suit economically.

In a recent column you discussed the suit lengths required for preemptive bidding. Couldn’t you also mention what HIGH CARDS are essential in that suit? Bidding at the two-level at adverse vulnerability surely cannot be considered without suit quality. Even at favorable vulnerability I’d like to hold two top honors — but where do you stand?

Cockney Sparrow, Coppell, Texas

When vulnerable, two of the top three honors is the normal minimum. And yet I would never pass a decent hand with a holding such as six cards to the acejack-ten. Non-vulnerable I like to have two top honors in second seat but in first and third seat I go with what my gut tells me. Bottom line: I don’t like to open suits without two top honors unless they have decent intermediates or some other compensating value.


For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog. Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2015. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].