July 14th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
Our brightest blazes of gladness are commonly kindled by unexpected sparks.
Samuel Johnson
| S |
North |
| Both |
♠ 9 5 3
♥ A 5 3
♦ 9 4 2
♣ Q 5 3 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q J 10 8
♥ 10 9 7 2
♦ K 3
♣ 8 6 4 |
♠ 7 6 4 2
♥ J 8 6
♦ Q 7 6 5
♣ 10 9 |
| South |
♠ A K
♥ K Q 4
♦ A J 10 8
♣ A K J 7 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 2 ♣ |
Pass |
2 ♦ |
Pass |
| 3 NT |
Pass |
6 NT |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♠Q
It feels right to reject the game-try – you are at the very minimum of your one no-trump response. The only question is whether to retreat to three clubs, and I say no. Your partner’s auction is entirely consistent with a balanced 18-count, with only three clubs. (Switch your minors, and had partner opened one diamond, then reverting to three diamonds with four-card support would be far more attractive).
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 9 5 3
♥ A 5 3
♦ 9 4 2
♣ Q 5 3 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
1 ♣ |
Pass |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
2 NT |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
July 13th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 5 Comments
There are no second chances in life, except to feel remorse.
Carlos Ruiz Zafon
| East |
North |
| None |
♠ K J 2
♥ A J 5
♦ 7 2
♣ 8 6 4 3 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ 6 5 4 3
♥ 4 2
♦ Q J 10 9
♣ J 9 7 |
♠ A Q 10 7
♥ 8 6 3
♦ A 8 6 5 3
♣ K |
| South |
♠ 9 8
♥ K Q 10 9 7
♦ K 4
♣ A Q 10 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
1 ♦ |
| 1 ♥ |
Pass |
2 ♥ |
Pass |
| 3 ♣ |
Pass |
4 ♥ |
All pass |
♦Q
Today’s problem comes from “Larry Teaches Opening Leads,” a new book by Larry Cohen. He advises that even though your clubs and hearts are better than your diamonds, you should lead the unbid suit when in doubt, as you certainly are here. This is good advice; declarer might easily have only one diamond stopper.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ 3
♥ Q 5 4 3
♦ J 7 6 5
♣ K 9 3 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
Pass |
1 ♠ |
| Pass |
2 ♥ |
Pass |
2 ♠ |
| Pass |
3 ♣ |
Pass |
3 NT |
| All pass |
|
|
|
July 12th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 10 Comments
|
During the auction, are you allowed (or even supposed) to use the terms: “Alert, Skip Bid, Transfer, Jump shift” and so on. I would like to be proven right or wrong so as not to continue this haranguing with my opponents! I have researched the printed word and searched the internet, but cannot find a definitive answer.
Baby Ruth, Troy, N.Y.
These words are not only legal but best practice. Stop (skip) bids are to prevent your LHO pausing too much or too little, thus tipping his partner off to his strength. If you MUST pause with both a flat four- or 14-count, your partner will be able to do what he pleases. An alert tells your opponents (not partner) that a call is conventional. If they wrongly think it is natural, they might be damaged. ‘Transfer’ is a small variant on the alert procedure; it applies to bids in response to a no-trump opening. The only required announcements are ‘skip’, ‘transfer’, ‘alert’ and ‘forcing’ for the response to the major, not ‘Jump Shift’.
As the proliferation of cuebids grows on my convention card, I’m seeking to find the best way to explain what an unassuming cuebid is and what the call has to be modest about!
Winston Smith, Sioux Falls, S.D.
The reason the call is so named is that facing an overcall, a cuebid by his partner shows a fit, and at least limit raise values. But it in no way promises any control (either high-card or shortage) in the opponent’s suit. Conversely, a jump raise of an overcalled suit now becomes much more about shape than high cards.
I was just reading a column last week where a player had a strong balanced hand in fourth chair when a one diamond call came round to him. With 17 points, why not simply bid one no-trump to avoid wrong-siding a major suit, as actually happened here?
Lip Smacker, Tucson, Ariz.
|
The range for the balancing no-trump is typically a good 10-15 points, so unless by agreement this call shows a weaker hand not a stronger one. One hopes to double and bid no-trump to show the extras; if you don’t play this style, you risk being closed out of the auction when you and your partner each hold balanced minimum opening bids.
I was thinking about going to Chicago in August to the US Nationals there, to try and get my first platinum points. However I see no way of entering any event with platinum points. Am I missing something?
Trophy Hunter, Newark, N.J.
My reading of the ACBL’s 2015 summer tournament schedule suggests that the bold upper-case events (the LM pairs, open pairs and fast pairs) do have platinum points I think. You can enter the second two events even if not a life master.
Earlier this week I had six hearts to the king-jack, and four spades to the ace-queen. I elected to pass in second seat (would you?). My partner opened a minor in fourth seat and rebid one no-trump over one heart, but passed my invitation to three hearts. Did I undercook the deal – since a favorable break gave me play for 12 tricks facing the minor-suit aces and the spade king?
Low-ball, Edmonton, Alberta
The initial pass is not my style though I understand it. Without the side four-card suit I might just invite game on your auction. But the extra playing strength and the well-placed honors makes it sensible to drive to game (perhaps in hearts if partner doesn’t admit to holding four spades).
|
July 11th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 11 Comments
Inspiration is the windfall from hard work and focus. Muses are too unreliable to keep on the payroll.
Helene Hanson
| W |
North |
| E-W |
♠ 10 6 3
♥ A 9 8 7
♦ K Q
♣ K 10 6 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q J 7 2
♥ K 3
♦ 9 8 7 5 4
♣ 9 8 |
♠ K 4
♥ J 10 5 4 2
♦ 10 3
♣ A J 7 5 |
| South |
♠ A 9 8 5
♥ Q 6
♦ A J 6 2
♣ Q 3 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
1 ♣ |
1 ♥ |
| Dbl. |
Pass |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
| 2 ♥ |
Dbl. |
Rdbl. |
Pass |
| 3 NT |
All pass |
|
|
♥K
Reluctantly, I would force this hand to game – as 12-counts with four-card support go, this is clearly not one of the more attractive ones. To set up the game-force, bid two spades, the fourth suit. This asks partner to describe their hand, and you plan to raise clubs at your next turn if space permits.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 10 6 3
♥ A 9 8 7
♦ K Q
♣ K 10 6 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
1 ♦ |
Pass |
| 1 ♥ |
Pass |
2 ♣ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
July 10th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 7 Comments
Once you hear the details of victory, it is hard to distinguish it from a defeat.
Jean-Paul Sartre
| S |
North |
| E-W |
♠ 10 8 6 3
♥ A Q 10
♦ Q 6 3 2
♣ 6 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q 7 4 2
♥ J 9 6 2
♦ 10
♣ K J 9 4 |
♠ 5
♥ K 8 7 5 3
♦ K 4
♣ A Q 10 8 5 |
| South |
♠ A K J 9
♥ 4
♦ A J 9 8 7 5
♣ 7 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♦ |
Pass |
1 ♠ |
2 NT |
| 4 ♠ |
4 NT |
5 ♦ |
Dbl. |
| All pass |
|
|
|
♠2
Your additional shape makes this well worth a jump to three spades. But do not be carried away into doing more; if your partner cannot raise to game now, you will surely not take 10 tricks. Worse, if you do jump to the four-level, you may find your partner taking you too seriously. Just for the record, with the diamond five the king, I would bid four diamonds to show this pattern in diamonds and spades.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A K J 9
♥ 4
♦ A J 9 8 7 5
♣ 7 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♦ |
Pass |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
July 9th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
Nothing so completely baffles one who is full of trick and duplicity himself, than straightforward and simple integrity in another.
Charles Caleb Colton
| W |
North |
| Both |
♠ K Q 7
♥ A K 10 8 4 3
♦ 5
♣ K 4 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ 9 8 4 3 2
♥ Q 2
♦ A 6 2
♣ Q 9 7 |
♠ J 6 5
♥ 9 7 6 5
♦ 10 7
♣ A J 6 3 |
| South |
♠ A 10
♥ J
♦ K Q J 9 8 4 3
♣ 10 8 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
1 ♥ |
Pass |
| 2 ♦ |
Pass |
2 ♥ |
Pass |
| 2 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♠8
There are several sensible choices. You are too good to rebid two hearts, so the choice is to bid three hearts (burying the spade fit) to raise to two or three spades – both of which somewhat overstate the spade support — or to bid two clubs, as a temporizing move, though one that rarely works for me. No action is perfect, but maybe a jump raise to three spades is less of a lie than a three-heart rebid.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K Q 7
♥ A K 10 8 4 3
♦ 5
♣ K 4 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♥ |
Pass |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
July 8th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 2 Comments
The thought of suicide is a great consolation: by means of it one gets through many a dark night.
Friedrich Nietzsche
| W |
North |
| N-S |
♠ K Q 5
♥ A J
♦ K 5
♣ K Q 9 7 6 5 |
| West |
East |
♠ 10 9 8 3
♥ 9
♦ Q J 10 9 8 4 3
♣ 4 |
♠ A J 4 2
♥ Q 6 5 4 3
♦ A 7
♣ 8 3 |
| South |
♠ 7 6
♥ K 10 8 7 2
♦ 6 2
♣ A J 10 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
4 ♦ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| 4 ♥ |
All pass |
|
|
♣4
It is tempting to jump in clubs, but this is not what your hand is about. You have too much outside strength and your club spots are feeble (on a bad day you might go down in three clubs while having a play for three no-trump). The real choice is whether to jump to two no-trump or three no-trump. The latter strongly suggests long clubs, so it would be my choice, since it also facilitates reaching six clubs.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K Q 5
♥ A J
♦ K 5
♣ K Q 9 7 6 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♣ |
Pass |
1 ♦ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
July 7th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 7 Comments
To be prepared for war is one of the most effectual means of preserving peace.
George Washington
| N |
North |
| E-W |
♠ K Q 10 4
♥ A K 9 6
♦ Q 9 8 7
♣ A |
| West |
East |
♠ A 7 5
♥ J 2
♦ J 3 2
♣ Q J 8 7 3 |
♠ J 9 8 2
♥ Q 7 4
♦ K 10 6 5
♣ K 6 |
| South |
♠ 6 3
♥ 10 8 5 3
♦ A 4
♣ 10 9 5 4 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♦ |
Pass |
| 1 ♥ |
Pass |
2 NT* |
Pass |
| 3 ♦** |
Pass |
4 ♥ |
All pass |
*Various strong hands
**Weak
♣Q
There are two sensible answers here, the first being to make a splinter-jump to four clubs, for which you are technically in range. The problem here is your weak diamonds and club ace – you would surely be worth that action if your ace were in diamonds not clubs. The simple pessimistic action, which I prefer, is just to jump to four hearts. Don’t be amazed if partner can’t make it!
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K Q 10 4
♥ A K 9 6
♦ Q 9 8 7
♣ A |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
Pass |
Pass |
| 1 ♦ |
Pass |
1 ♥ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
July 6th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
We’re all islands shouting lies to each other across seas of misunderstanding.
Rudyard Kipling
| S |
North |
| None |
♠ A J 8 7 5
♥ 3
♦ A 10 8 7
♣ J 9 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q 4
♥ K 10 7 6 5 2
♦ Q J 6
♣ K 7 |
♠ 10 6 3 2
♥ A 9
♦ 5 4
♣ Q 10 8 6 2 |
| South |
♠ K 9
♥ Q J 8 4
♦ K 9 3 2
♣ A 5 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♦ |
2 ♥ |
2 ♠ |
Pass |
| 2 NT |
Pass |
3 ♦ |
Pass |
| 3 NT |
All pass |
|
|
♠Q
Your opponents seem well prepared for a heart lead against the slam (why else would East raise to six so dramatically?). With no particular reason in mind I’m going to guess to lead spades, perhaps with the idea that if I can force declarer to ruff, maybe the bad club break will cause him some problems.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 9 6 4
♥ 9 6 2
♦ 8 7
♣ J 8 5 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
Pass |
1 ♣ |
| Pass |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
2 ♦ |
| Pass |
3 ♦ |
Pass |
6 ♦ |
| All pass |
|
|
|
July 5th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
|
My partner held the following hand: ♠ A-9-8-3, ♥ Q-10-9-2, ♦ K-10-9-3, ♣ 5 when he heard me open one heart. Was he worth a limit raise, or a jump to game? His choice of inviting game with a simple raise saw me pass with a flat 12-count, but I made five.
Spirit-level, Willoughby, Ohio
The hand is definitely worth a raise to game — you might not always make it, but you’d want to be there facing any normal opening bid. The question is whether instead to make a splinter-raise to four clubs; I might not do that, but a lot depends on how much you play a splinter-bid promises here. Having a way to show a limited splinter-bid, or a constructive raise from one to four is very useful (though by no means essential).
When my opponents lead from the wrong hand at the first trick what are my options?
Straight Arrow, Harrisburg, Pa.
The first thing to do is to call the director if playing at a club. Having said that, the options are to allow the lead to be made and continue play to trick one, with dummy going down and playing fourth to the trick. Or you can either prevent the suit from being played until the true leader has lost the lead, insist on the suit being led, or even ask that the exposed card be played at its first legal opportunity, while allowing the real leader do what he or she likes.
I’m somewhat hazy on the true meaning of the term “Responsive double”. Could you clarify for me whether such doubles are primarily for take-out or penalties or true optional doubles?
Pirate Jack, Bellingham, Wash.
The simplest version of a responsive double comes when your LHO opens the bidding. If your partner doubles, and RHO raises the suit, a double by you would be takeout. Note that should RHO bid a new suit, then double by you would be penalty not take-out. The responsive take-out double of a raised minor normally suggests both majors, while the double of hearts normally denies spades, since you would bid them if you could. In my view a responsive double of spades neither promises nor denies hearts.
|
I’m not clear about how to act after intervention to my partner’s two club opening. My hand was: ♠ J-10-3-2, ♥ Q-6, ♦ J-10-8-6-4, ♣ K-9 and I heard my partner open two clubs and the next player bid three clubs. Is it right to bid three diamonds, and if not, what action would you recommend?
Unsuitable, Dodge City, Kan.
I’d recommend a simple style here where double is any weak hand, with a pass showing something like 5-8 points. In your example I’d pass here; but give me the diamond king instead of the club king and I’d bid three diamonds, because I’d feel this might be my last chance to introduce the suit economically.
In a recent column you discussed the suit lengths required for preemptive bidding. Couldn’t you also mention what HIGH CARDS are essential in that suit? Bidding at the two-level at adverse vulnerability surely cannot be considered without suit quality. Even at favorable vulnerability I’d like to hold two top honors — but where do you stand?
Cockney Sparrow, Coppell, Texas
When vulnerable, two of the top three honors is the normal minimum. And yet I would never pass a decent hand with a holding such as six cards to the acejack-ten. Non-vulnerable I like to have two top honors in second seat but in first and third seat I go with what my gut tells me. Bottom line: I don’t like to open suits without two top honors unless they have decent intermediates or some other compensating value.
|
|
In today’s deal the optimal contract is six clubs, but it is often hard to locate a 4-4 fit when the auction gets high in a hurry. After North-South had a quantitative auction, it proved impossible to find their minor-suit fit.
When West led the spade queen against the slam, declarer could see that his route to 12 tricks involved getting three tricks from the diamond suit, and to do so he needed to take three finesses in the suit. As this required three entries, declarer played the club ace and king at tricks two and three. Then he took the club jack and played a fourth club to dummy’s queen.
Next he led a diamond to his jack and West’s king. He won the spade return and crossed back to dummy by leading to the heart ace. This was the entry to dummy to run the diamond nine, and he could remain in dummy for the third diamond finesse. In the end, declarer took two spades, three hearts, three diamonds and four clubs.
As an aside, note the effect of West ducking the first diamond. Wouldn’t declarer now have considered crossing to dummy to repeat the diamond finesse? When West produced the king and diamonds broke 4-2 South would have had a cardiac arrest. (For the record, declarer could lead a low diamond from hand after the first finesse succeeds, planning a later finesse – but that might lose out if West had ducked from an original holding of king-third or king-fourth.)