July 4th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 2 Comments
Honest unaffected distrust of human abilities under all circumstances is the surest sign of strength of mind.
Georg Christoph Lichtenberg
| N |
North |
| N-S |
♠ 9 7 5 4
♥ A Q 10 7
♦ K 5
♣ 10 8 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ 3
♥ K J 9 4
♦ A 10 8 6 2
♣ 9 7 4 |
♠ Q 10 6 2
♥ 3 2
♦ Q 9 4 3
♣ A K 3 |
| South |
♠ A K J 8
♥ 8 6 5
♦ J 7
♣ Q J 6 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
Pass |
Pass |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
2 ♠ |
Pass |
| Pass |
Dbl. |
Rdbl. |
3 ♣ |
| Pass |
Pass |
3 ♠ |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♣4
Unless you have a specific agreement to the contrary, the call of two no-trump is invitational but not forcing, suggesting 10-11 high cards and just four spades. You have a minimum in high cards but a hand that you would guess would play much better in spades than in no-trump, so retreat to three spades.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A K J 8
♥ 8 6 5
♦ J 7
♣ Q J 6 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♣ |
Pass |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
| 2 ♠ |
Pass |
2 NT |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
July 3rd, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Friday, June 19th, 2015
Good instincts usually tell you what you do long before your head has figured it out.
Michael Burke
| W |
North |
| N-S |
♠ A
♥ A 7 5
♦ A 10 8 3 2
♣ A Q 7 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ J 9 7 6 5
♥ Q J 4 2
♦ K Q 9
♣ 8 |
♠ K 4 3 2
♥ 9 6 3
♦ J 5
♣ J 10 9 4 |
| South |
♠ Q 10 8
♥ K 10 8
♦ 7 6 4
♣ K 6 5 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
1 ♦ |
Pass |
| 1 NT |
2 ♦* |
Dbl. |
2 ♠ |
| 2 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
*Majors
♠7
Your partner’s call is non-forcing, and though you have decent club support and the odd value or two, your majorsuit honors are of questionable worth, and three small diamonds is surely a further negative. Pass two clubs, and hope the opponents do not balance. You might raise to three clubs if you had the heart ace instead of the king – and slightly better diamond spots.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 10 8
♥ K 9 8
♦ 9 7 4
♣ K 6 5 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
1 ♦ |
Pass |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
2 ♣ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
July 2nd, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 8 Comments
Dream what you want to dream go where you want to go, be what you want to be because you only have one life and one chance to do all the things you want to do.
Nishan Panwar
| S |
North |
| None |
♠ K 8 6
♥ A K J
♦ 10 9 3
♣ K 10 4 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ 9 4
♥ 10 9 3 2
♦ A K 4
♣ 9 6 5 2 |
♠ 7 5 3
♥ 8 7 6 5 4
♦ Q J 8 5 2
♣ — |
| South |
♠ A Q J 10 2
♥ Q
♦ 7 6
♣ A Q J 8 7 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
2 ♣ |
Pass |
| 3 ♥* |
Pass |
3 ♠ |
Pass |
| 4 ♣ |
Pass |
4 ♠ |
All pass |
*Splinter-bid: short hearts, agreeing clubs
♦K
It is rare that you can be confident with a hand this good that the correct percentage action is to pass as soon as decorum permits. You are far short of the values for overcalling in no-trump. And if you double for take-out you may well find your partner suffering in a 4-3 fit with no high cards and a bad split against him, doubled, to boot. Your partner can still balance if he has the right hand.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K 8 6
♥ A K J
♦ 10 9 3
♣ K 10 4 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
Pass |
2 ♠ |
| ? |
|
|
|
July 1st, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 7 Comments
I never make stupid mistakes. Only very, very clever ones.
John Peel
| S |
North |
| N-S |
♠ Q 8 3
♥ 10 7 3
♦ Q 9 6 4 2
♣ A K |
| West |
East |
♠ J 9 2
♥ J 8
♦ A J 3
♣ Q J 5 3 2 |
♠ 10 7 6 5
♥ Q 9 6 5 2
♦ 10 8
♣ 8 4 |
| South |
♠ A K 4
♥ A K 4
♦ K 7 5
♣ 10 9 7 6 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♣3
You are too good for a simple raise to two hearts, and the hand doesn’t feel quite right for a call of one no-trump, since you may be offering partner club ruffs in dummy, which he could hardly predict. All that is left is a cuebid of two clubs, the so-called unassuming cue bid, showing a limit raise in high cards. By contrast, a jump to three hearts is nowadays played more about shape than high cards.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 8 3
♥ 10 7 3
♦ Q 9 6 4 2
♣ A K |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♣ |
1 ♥ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
June 30th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 5 Comments
The plan, a memory of the future, tries on reality to see if it fits.
Laurence Gonzales
| N |
North |
| None |
♠ A 9 3 2
♥ 4 2
♦ K 8 3
♣ A 7 6 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ K Q J 10 8
♥ J 10 8 3
♦ Q 10
♣ K 10 |
♠ 7 5 4
♥ 9
♦ J 9 7 5 4
♣ Q 9 8 5 |
| South |
♠ 6
♥ A K Q 7 6 5
♦ A 6 2
♣ J 4 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
Pass |
Pass |
| 1 ♥ |
1 ♠ |
2 NT |
Pass |
| 4 ♥ |
All pass |
|
|
♠K
Since you have enough points to know your side has the majority of high cards, lead a trump to prevent the opponents scoring their trumps separately. It is a good thought to have at the back of your mind that when the opponents are not overly blessed with high cards, and do not appear to have a side-suit to set up and run, leading trumps is generally indicated.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ J 9 7 3 2
♥ J 9 2
♦ J 8
♣ A J 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♣ |
Pass |
| 1 ♠ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
4 ♥ |
| All pass |
|
|
|
June 29th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 10 Comments
If you want to cut your own throat, don’t come to me for a bandage.
Margaret Thatcher
| N |
North |
| Both |
♠ A 9 6 2
♥ 5 3
♦ 10 6 4 3 2
♣ J 10 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q J 8 4 3
♥ Q 10 9 8 2
♦ A 5
♣ 7 |
♠ 10 7 5
♥ 7
♦ K Q J 9 8
♣ 9 8 5 2 |
| South |
♠ K
♥ A K J 6 4
♦ 7
♣ A K Q 6 4 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
Pass |
Pass |
| 1 ♣ |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
2 ♠ |
| 4 ♥ |
Pass |
5 ♣ |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♦A
This deal shows the divide between pairs and teams. At teams, where you are trying to set the contract, and overtricks are less unimportant, you should focus on the suit most likely to set the game. I’d lead a low heart at teams, while at pairs I’d try the club eight — that being the suit least likely to surrender an unnecessary trick. I tend to favor passive defense when in doubt on blind auctions like this.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ K 6 5 2
♥ Q 9 8
♦ K 9 8
♣ 8 6 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
Pass |
1 ♦ |
| Pass |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
2 NT |
| Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
|
June 28th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 3 Comments
|
I recently missed a game when I responded one no-trump to a one diamond opening on an unpromising eight-count with 3-3-3-4 pattern and no 10s. My partner raised to two no-trumps, and I expected him to be a shapely hand in the strong no-trump range so I passed. It turned out he had 18 points. I thought one would jump to game with that hand?
Wrong Brother, Atlanta, Ga.
I’ll stay on the fence for this. To me your partner has a fair case; since the range for one no-trump is 6-10 you don’t have to bid game with a square 18-count, Though equally you might bid two no-trump with a semi-balanced 16-17. Thus in response I’d treat an eight-count as an acceptance. However, if I didn’t trust partner I’d certainly pass.
If you open one club holding: ♠ 3, ♥ A-J-6, ♦ K-Q-4-2, ♣ A-K-9-3-2 and partner responds one spade, should you jump to two notrumps, or bid two diamonds as a reverse?
A Suitable Case, Holland, Mich.
With an unbalanced hand like this one, bid your suits not no-trump. Switch the minors and I’d have more sympathy with the jump in no-trump, as I would not yet have shown my extras, but I think I’d still settle for bidding out my hand pattern with a two-club call, not a game-forcing bid of three clubs. I hope there will be time for no-trump on the next round.
When you hear an opening four hearts to your right, and you hold a 14-count with 3-1-4-5 pattern, do you pass or double? And what if the auction comes round to you in balancing seat?
Streaky Bacon, New Smyrna Beach, Fla.
|
You would have a 100% unanimous panel vote if this were a problem. A double of four hearts suggests a good hand, more for take-out than optional, so most would feel obliged to act. Yes, holding only three spades isn’t great, but doubling is the flexible and consultative call. It won’t always work, but it is clearly the best way to have a dialogue not a monologue.
I’m reading in your columns a use of the term New Minor. This seems to work like Stayman, but when does it apply, and would you encourage a relative newcomer to consider learning it?
Conventional Chuck, Palm Springs, Calif.
I am opposed to teaching anyone new conventions. But I admit that after opener’s rebid of one or two no-trump this gadget (which uses an unbid minor suit by responder at his second turn as forcing) is a sensible way to ask opener to reveal three-card support for responder, or to announce four cards in an unbid major.
I was stuck for a call holding: ♠ Q-7-3, ♥ Q-8-6-2, ♦ J-4-3, ♣ 1-0-8-7 when my partner doubled an opening bid of one heart. How would you compare passing, bidding one no-trump, or inventing a suit?
Two in the Glue, Wichita Falls, Texas
Passing is unacceptable here (one needs real trump length and trump tricks to do that) so your choice appears to be to invent a suit or to risk one notrump, which suggests a rather better hand than this. I guess I’d try one no-trump and cross my fingers; bidding one spade always seems to backfire here, since partners seem to raise excessively on finding a fit. Thus two clubs would be my second choice.
|
June 27th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 13 Comments
The universe is simple; it’s the explanation that’s complex.
Woody Allen
| E |
North |
| Both |
♠ K Q 5 2
♥ A K J 10 4
♦ 4 2
♣ A 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ J 10 6
♥ Q 7
♦ J 10 8 7 5 3
♣ J 6 |
♠ A
♥ 9 8 6 3
♦ A 9 6
♣ K Q 9 8 3 |
| South |
♠ 9 8 7 4 3
♥ 5 2
♦ K Q
♣ 10 7 5 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
2 ♣* |
| Pass |
Pass |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| 2 ♠ |
Pass |
3 ♣ |
Pass |
| 3 ♠ |
Pass |
4 ♠ |
All pass |
*11-16 points; five plus clubs in an unbalanced hand
♣J
Depending on the vulnerability and form of scoring you might be prepared to risk pre-balancing with a double here. Yes, you might catch LHO with a strong hand, but at pairs, or non-vulnerable you should risk a double to show a three-suited hand with opening values and short spades.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A
♥ 9 8 6 3
♦ A 9 6
♣ K Q 9 8 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
Pass |
1 ♣ |
| Pass |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
2 ♠ |
| ? |
|
|
|
June 26th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Friday, June 12th, 2015
There are some people who live in a dream world, and there are some who face reality; and then there are those who turn one into the other.
Douglas H. Everett
| S |
North |
| None |
♠ K 5
♥ A 6 3 2
♦ Q 10 8 6 2
♣ J 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q 9 8 3
♥ K Q 7
♦ K 7 5
♣ 9 8 3 |
♠ 10 2
♥ J 9
♦ J 9 4 3
♣ A 10 7 5 2 |
| South |
♠ A J 7 6 4
♥ 10 8 5 4
♦ A
♣ K Q 6 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
1 NT |
Pass |
| 2 ♥ |
Pass |
3 ♥ |
Pass |
| 4 ♥ |
All pass |
|
|
♣9
This hand is tailor made for a take-out double. When the opponents bid and raise a suit, sandwiched around your partner’s overcall, your double suggests both unbid suits, or one unbid suit and some support for partner. Here, you will be happy to hear partner pick a red suit or repeat his spades. The same logic applies when RHO bids a new suit at his first turn. Doubling shows the fourth suit and values.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K 5
♥ A 6 3 2
♦ Q 10 8 6 2
♣ J 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| Pass |
1 ♣ |
1 ♠ |
2 ♣ |
| ? |
|
|
|
June 25th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
Tomorrow night I’m giving a lecture on silence and invisibility. Don’t be surprised if I don’t show up.
Jarod Kintz
| N |
North |
| E-W |
♠ A
♥ K 6 2
♦ 10 8 7 5 2
♣ A 9 6 5 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q J 10 8 3
♥ Q 9 4 3
♦ 4 3
♣ 8 2 |
♠ 9 6 5
♥ 10 8 5
♦ A J 9
♣ K Q J 7 |
| South |
♠ K 7 4 2
♥ A J 7
♦ K Q 6
♣ 10 4 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♦ |
Pass |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
2 ♣ |
Pass |
| 3 NT |
All pass |
|
|
♠Q
I hope there will not be too many readers who have shuddered at the idea of responding light, and who now want to shut up shop in one notrump. We all know that this hand will play better in hearts or spades than in no-trump. Bid two hearts and let partner pick where he wants to play. (If you had game interest you would use ‘New Minor’ by bidding two clubs over one notrump as a forcing enquiry.)
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ Q J 10 8 3
♥ Q 9 4 3
♦ 4 3
♣ 8 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
1 ♦ |
Pass |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
1 NT |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
|
At the bridge table, you soon find out that some people are inherently untrustworthy… but sometimes with the best will in the world you have to believe Zia Mahmood… don’t you?
In a recent Lederer Teams tournament John Mohan protected in the West seat after the opponents’ bidding had died in two spades. Zia’s bid of three clubs might not have been the majority choice, but it created a bit of excitement. Victor Silverstone didn’t double three clubs with his minimum hand, so Zia never got to demonstrate that his three clubs had been merely lead-directional.
Mohan obediently led a club against three spades. Left to his own devices Silverstone would almost certainly have made the contract, playing East for the spade queen and West for the diamond ace and the heart king-jack. Indeed, there is little else he can do, and both Vlad Isporski for the Spring Foursomes Winners and David Horton for Australia made nine tricks in spades in this way. However Zia won the club lead with the king and switched to the heart two!
From Silverstone’s point of view this was clearly a singleton, so he rejected the spade finesse and cashed the trump ace and king, getting the bad news. He exited with a club to the ace and Zia played the heart three, by now, a real singleton.
Silverstone won in dummy and led a spade. Zia went up with the queen, played a diamond to his partner’s ace and Mohan had no difficulty giving Zia his heart ruff for down one.