June 28th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 3 Comments
|
I recently missed a game when I responded one no-trump to a one diamond opening on an unpromising eight-count with 3-3-3-4 pattern and no 10s. My partner raised to two no-trumps, and I expected him to be a shapely hand in the strong no-trump range so I passed. It turned out he had 18 points. I thought one would jump to game with that hand?
Wrong Brother, Atlanta, Ga.
I’ll stay on the fence for this. To me your partner has a fair case; since the range for one no-trump is 6-10 you don’t have to bid game with a square 18-count, Though equally you might bid two no-trump with a semi-balanced 16-17. Thus in response I’d treat an eight-count as an acceptance. However, if I didn’t trust partner I’d certainly pass.
If you open one club holding: ♠ 3, ♥ A-J-6, ♦ K-Q-4-2, ♣ A-K-9-3-2 and partner responds one spade, should you jump to two notrumps, or bid two diamonds as a reverse?
A Suitable Case, Holland, Mich.
With an unbalanced hand like this one, bid your suits not no-trump. Switch the minors and I’d have more sympathy with the jump in no-trump, as I would not yet have shown my extras, but I think I’d still settle for bidding out my hand pattern with a two-club call, not a game-forcing bid of three clubs. I hope there will be time for no-trump on the next round.
When you hear an opening four hearts to your right, and you hold a 14-count with 3-1-4-5 pattern, do you pass or double? And what if the auction comes round to you in balancing seat?
Streaky Bacon, New Smyrna Beach, Fla.
|
You would have a 100% unanimous panel vote if this were a problem. A double of four hearts suggests a good hand, more for take-out than optional, so most would feel obliged to act. Yes, holding only three spades isn’t great, but doubling is the flexible and consultative call. It won’t always work, but it is clearly the best way to have a dialogue not a monologue.
I’m reading in your columns a use of the term New Minor. This seems to work like Stayman, but when does it apply, and would you encourage a relative newcomer to consider learning it?
Conventional Chuck, Palm Springs, Calif.
I am opposed to teaching anyone new conventions. But I admit that after opener’s rebid of one or two no-trump this gadget (which uses an unbid minor suit by responder at his second turn as forcing) is a sensible way to ask opener to reveal three-card support for responder, or to announce four cards in an unbid major.
I was stuck for a call holding: ♠ Q-7-3, ♥ Q-8-6-2, ♦ J-4-3, ♣ 1-0-8-7 when my partner doubled an opening bid of one heart. How would you compare passing, bidding one no-trump, or inventing a suit?
Two in the Glue, Wichita Falls, Texas
Passing is unacceptable here (one needs real trump length and trump tricks to do that) so your choice appears to be to invent a suit or to risk one notrump, which suggests a rather better hand than this. I guess I’d try one no-trump and cross my fingers; bidding one spade always seems to backfire here, since partners seem to raise excessively on finding a fit. Thus two clubs would be my second choice.
|
June 27th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 13 Comments
The universe is simple; it’s the explanation that’s complex.
Woody Allen
| E |
North |
| Both |
♠ K Q 5 2
♥ A K J 10 4
♦ 4 2
♣ A 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ J 10 6
♥ Q 7
♦ J 10 8 7 5 3
♣ J 6 |
♠ A
♥ 9 8 6 3
♦ A 9 6
♣ K Q 9 8 3 |
| South |
♠ 9 8 7 4 3
♥ 5 2
♦ K Q
♣ 10 7 5 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
2 ♣* |
| Pass |
Pass |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| 2 ♠ |
Pass |
3 ♣ |
Pass |
| 3 ♠ |
Pass |
4 ♠ |
All pass |
*11-16 points; five plus clubs in an unbalanced hand
♣J
Depending on the vulnerability and form of scoring you might be prepared to risk pre-balancing with a double here. Yes, you might catch LHO with a strong hand, but at pairs, or non-vulnerable you should risk a double to show a three-suited hand with opening values and short spades.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A
♥ 9 8 6 3
♦ A 9 6
♣ K Q 9 8 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
Pass |
1 ♣ |
| Pass |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
2 ♠ |
| ? |
|
|
|
June 26th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Friday, June 12th, 2015
There are some people who live in a dream world, and there are some who face reality; and then there are those who turn one into the other.
Douglas H. Everett
| S |
North |
| None |
♠ K 5
♥ A 6 3 2
♦ Q 10 8 6 2
♣ J 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q 9 8 3
♥ K Q 7
♦ K 7 5
♣ 9 8 3 |
♠ 10 2
♥ J 9
♦ J 9 4 3
♣ A 10 7 5 2 |
| South |
♠ A J 7 6 4
♥ 10 8 5 4
♦ A
♣ K Q 6 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
1 NT |
Pass |
| 2 ♥ |
Pass |
3 ♥ |
Pass |
| 4 ♥ |
All pass |
|
|
♣9
This hand is tailor made for a take-out double. When the opponents bid and raise a suit, sandwiched around your partner’s overcall, your double suggests both unbid suits, or one unbid suit and some support for partner. Here, you will be happy to hear partner pick a red suit or repeat his spades. The same logic applies when RHO bids a new suit at his first turn. Doubling shows the fourth suit and values.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K 5
♥ A 6 3 2
♦ Q 10 8 6 2
♣ J 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| Pass |
1 ♣ |
1 ♠ |
2 ♣ |
| ? |
|
|
|
June 25th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
Tomorrow night I’m giving a lecture on silence and invisibility. Don’t be surprised if I don’t show up.
Jarod Kintz
| N |
North |
| E-W |
♠ A
♥ K 6 2
♦ 10 8 7 5 2
♣ A 9 6 5 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q J 10 8 3
♥ Q 9 4 3
♦ 4 3
♣ 8 2 |
♠ 9 6 5
♥ 10 8 5
♦ A J 9
♣ K Q J 7 |
| South |
♠ K 7 4 2
♥ A J 7
♦ K Q 6
♣ 10 4 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♦ |
Pass |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
2 ♣ |
Pass |
| 3 NT |
All pass |
|
|
♠Q
I hope there will not be too many readers who have shuddered at the idea of responding light, and who now want to shut up shop in one notrump. We all know that this hand will play better in hearts or spades than in no-trump. Bid two hearts and let partner pick where he wants to play. (If you had game interest you would use ‘New Minor’ by bidding two clubs over one notrump as a forcing enquiry.)
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ Q J 10 8 3
♥ Q 9 4 3
♦ 4 3
♣ 8 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
1 ♦ |
Pass |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
1 NT |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
June 24th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
Disappointment to a noble soul is what cold water is to burning metal; it strengthens, tempers, intensifies, but never destroys it.
Eliza Tabor
| S |
North |
| None |
♠ J 9 2
♥ A 7 6 3
♦ A 2
♣ A 9 7 6 |
| West |
East |
♠ A 7 3
♥ 5 2
♦ J 8 7 5 4
♣ 4 3 2 |
♠ K 10 8 5 4
♥ K 8
♦ 10 6 3
♣ Q 8 5 |
| South |
♠ Q 6
♥ Q J 10 9 4
♦ K Q 9
♣ K J 10 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♥ |
Pass |
2 NT* |
Pass |
| 4 ♥ |
All pass |
|
|
*Game-forcing heart raise
♦4
Bid three hearts now. Your partner presumably has short clubs and worry about your side’s club stoppers for no-trump. You have no reason to commit to no-trump yet, particularly when you have a four-card major to show. If your partner rebids three spades rather than three no-trump, you can reconsider what strain or level is appropriate here.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ J 9 2
♥ A 7 6 3
♦ A 2
♣ A 9 7 6 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♣ |
1 ♦ |
Pass |
| 2 NT |
Pass |
3 ♣ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
June 23rd, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
It is hard to be defensive toward a danger which you have never imagined existed.
John Christopher
| W |
North |
| E-W |
♠ K 9 4 2
♥ 10 3
♦ K Q 5 3
♣ J 7 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ J 8 3
♥ 9 5 4 2
♦ 10 8 7 6
♣ Q 2 |
♠ 7 6 5
♥ A
♦ J 9 2
♣ A K 10 9 6 5 |
| South |
♠ A Q 10
♥ K Q J 8 7 6
♦ A 4
♣ 8 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
Pass |
1 ♣ |
| 1 ♥ |
Pass |
1 NT |
Pass |
| 4 ♥ |
All pass |
|
|
♣Q
Had your partner doubled an opening bid of one club or one heart, you might have been tempted by what looked like a working second suit in diamonds to jump to two spades. On the actual auction, your diamonds look badly placed and bidding one spade (planning to compete again if necessary) seems the logical way to go.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K 9 4 2
♥ 10 3
♦ K Q 5 3
♣ J 7 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♦ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
June 22nd, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 7 Comments
The secret of life is honesty and fair dealing. If you can fake that, you’ve got it made.
Groucho Marx
| W |
North |
| N-S |
♠ A J 2
♥ K J 8 7
♦ A Q 3 2
♣ K 10 |
| West |
East |
♠ 10 9 8 7 5
♥ 10 6 4
♦ 7 5
♣ 8 5 4 |
♠ K 4
♥ 9 5 3 2
♦ K J 10 4
♣ A Q 6 |
| South |
♠ Q 6 3
♥ A Q
♦ 9 8 6
♣ J 9 7 3 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
1 ♦ |
Pass |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
2 NT |
Pass |
| 3 NT |
All pass |
|
|
♠10
The choice seems to be between a top club and a low heart. I can see the arguments for both sides, but with my spades and diamonds apparently lying well for declarer, I will go for the more aggressive choice of a heart rather than a club. I’m hoping to set up hearts before the opponents establish a black suit for a discard.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 8 3
♥ Q 10 6 3
♦ A 10
♣ 9 8 6 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
Pass |
1 ♦ |
| Pass |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
2 ♦ |
| All pass |
|
|
|
June 21st, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 5 Comments
|
I was brought up on fourth highest leads, occasionally leading second highest from three or four small. But my new partner advocates third and fifth leads against suits. What do you advocate in this regard?
Given the Pip, Greenville, S.C.
While I normally play fourth highest leads, I may lead second from four small cards against no-trump, but from three cards I lead low or top. At suit contracts, third and fifth leads may help your partner to distinguish your suit length. But fourth highest leads may be more helpful in allowing your partner to work out the strength of your suit.
In a recent “Bid With The Aces,” North opened one spade then made a “free” rebid of two hearts after his RHO overcalled his partner’s one no-trump response with a call of two diamonds. Doesn’t that show a big hand? If so, his partner, with 10 HCP and five clubs, should maybe bid a game forcing three clubs? With diamonds controlled, North could then can play in three no-trump, or show his major-suit pattern.
Sideshow Bob, Duluth, Minn.
After a one no-trump response opener’s two hearts rebid over two diamonds simply shows 5-4 shape, not extra values. One makes the call with almost any hand of that pattern. Over that, a cuebid of three diamonds would be artificial by South, but three clubs would be just a long suit, to play. South (with a 2-3-3-5 10-count and no diamond stop) isn’t worth any more than an invitation to game by raising to three hearts…if that.
What is the appropriate procedure to be followed if declarer leads out of his hand, when he should be leading from the board?
Picky-picky, Carmel, Calif.
If declarer leads from the wrong hand, either defender can condone the lead by following suit, or discarding as appropriate, or saying that they accept the lead. If attention is drawn to the irregularity, declarer can correct his play, and lead any suit he likes from the correct hand. He does NOT have to play the suit led.
|
My partner opened one heart and jumped to three hearts over my game-forcing two club response. I held: ♠ A-Q-10-3, ♥ —, ♦ 2, ♣ A-K-10-9-7-6-5-3. I realized that the void in my partner’s long suit was bad, but we could not agree if I should insist on playing clubs as opposed to hearts. Most pairs went down in impossible heart, club, and notrump slams so we were not alone. My partner had seven non-solid hearts and a club singleton with the spade and diamond kings.
Taking the Mickey, Fayetteville, N.C.
If playing 2/1, your partner’s auction promised a solid suit, or a solid suit missing the ace or king. Incidentally, note that a club slam is not much worse than 50% and in the unlikely event of no diamond lead you would surely make it. I agree responder should downgrade his hand, but slam may easily be cold facing some uninspiring minimums for the auction. So I’d surely make at least one slam try for clubs.
My partner opened one club and I held: ♠ J-7-3, ♥ 10-8-6-2, ♦ A-10-6, ♣ Q-9-5. Would you advocate responding one diamond, one heart, or one no-trump?
Quantity Surveyor, Great Falls, Mont.
One no-trump is a reasonable option, but tends to deny a four-card major. Do you have a four-card major? It depends on your definition of a suit. I have a preference on minimum hands for bidding the majors as soon as possible — otherwise the suit may get lost altogether. Give me the spade queen instead of the three and yes, you might sell me on a no-trump response.
|
June 20th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 13 Comments
What is a society without a heroic dimension?
Jean Baudrillard
| S |
North |
| E-W |
♠ A 10 6 3
♥ 6
♦ 10 6 2
♣ A Q 7 6 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ J 9 7
♥ 10
♦ Q J 9 8 7 3
♣ K 10 8 |
♠ 8 4 2
♥ K Q 8 5
♦ A K 5 4
♣ 9 5 |
| South |
♠ K Q 5
♥ A J 9 7 4 3 2
♦ —
♣ J 4 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♥ |
Pass |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
| 4 ♥ |
All pass |
|
|
♦Q
You are far too good to pass, since you could be cold for game in two or three different strains. While this is a normal response of one spade to an opening one heart bid, I would prefer to bid two clubs in response to an overcall. It may make it harder to get to spades, but I would avoid responding in a four-card suit if I had a sensible alternative.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A 10 6 3
♥ 6
♦ 10 6 2
♣ A Q 7 6 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♦ |
1 ♥ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
June 19th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 3 Comments
The reasonable man adapts himself to the world; the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself. Therefore all progress depends on the unreasonable man.
G. B. Shaw
| E |
North |
| N-S |
♠ 8 7 4
♥ A Q J
♦ A Q 4 2
♣ A Q 8 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q 10 9
♥ 10 7 5 3
♦ 9 7
♣ K 9 4 2 |
♠ 5
♥ 9 8 6
♦ K J 10 6 5 3
♣ 10 7 5 |
| South |
♠ A K J 6 3 2
♥ K 4 2
♦ 8
♣ J 6 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
3 ♦ |
| 3 ♠ |
Pass |
4 ♦ |
Pass |
| 4 ♠ |
Pass |
4 NT |
Pass |
| 5 ♥ * |
Pass |
6 ♠ |
All pass |
* Two of the five-key cards but no trump queen
♦9
What should you expect your partner to have? Not just clubs! He’d open three clubs or bid two clubs over one spade. All passed hands jumps facing opening bids or overcalls can’t be natural and weak – you’d do something else at either your first or second turn. I’d advocate playing this jump as spade fit (typically four-card support) and a decent club suit; so now a jump to four spades must be right.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A K J 6 3 2
♥ K 4 2
♦ 8
♣ J 6 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
Pass |
1 ♦ |
| 1 ♠ |
Dbl. |
3 ♣ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
|
In bridge one should never say never, and while an even trumpbreak is normally top of declarer’s wish list, there are always exceptions. Sometimes one has to project the complete distribution, and work out that bad splits can be more productive than a favorable break. That is especially true of hands like today’s.
After a fairly sporting auction by North, Augustin Santamaria of Argentina reached a delicate four spade game, a contract that was made even more challenging by the fact that the auction had indicated the danger of bad splits. On the lead of the club jack, Santamaria took dummy’s ace and played a low diamond. East won his diamond ace, cashed the club queen, and exited with a diamond.
At this point Santamaria was in a very awkward position; he could see that if trumps were two-two, then unless West specifically had the doubleton jack-10 of trumps, the defense could promote a trump winner for themselves by leading a third round of clubs after taking the ace of trumps. Therefore when declarer led the spade seven from hand and West followed with a small trump, declarer went for his only legitimate chance to make the hand by ducking in dummy! When East produced the spade ace there was no longer any possibility of the defense producing a second trump trick. Thus the contract made, for a 12 IMP pickup for Argentina, on the way to an upset in their knock-out match from the 1986 Rosenblum Cup.