April 19th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 9 Comments
|
We play two over one, and recently I was criticized for my handling of this collection. I held: ♠ 10-7-2, ♥ Q-8-3, ♦ A-K-J-7-3-2, ♣ Q, and responded with a forcing one no-trump to one spade, then jumped to three spades over my partner’s two club call. I was told later that I should force to game with 12 points – but the comical denouement to this deal is that with trumps 4-1 the limit of the hand was eight tricks. Down one was a shared top!
Yellow-Bellied Sap-Sucker, Dayton, Ohio
I think you used good judgment not to force to game, since the bad trump and singleton honor make this worth less than the high cards suggest. At teams I might drive the hand to game notwithstanding that, but at pairs use your judgment, and assume your partner will understand, even if he doesn’t agree.
With what range hands should one make a splinter-raise of one’s partner? This question applies both to responder to an opening bid, and by opener to his partner’s response.
Love Lorn, Spartanburg, S.C.
In the absence of complex agreements a splinter in response to an opening shows the equivalent of an opening bid. One should not do it with a really strong hand but should start with a Jacoby Two no-trump or the equivalent. As opener, splinter in response to a one-level response with 17+, shortness, and four-card trump support. In rebidding after a one-level opening and two-level response, assuming you are already in a game force, you do not need real extras to make a splinter-bid.
Can you tell me what are the rules relating to played cards by the defenders or declarer (or dummy for that matter)? The two common issues that seem to create problems are dropped cards, or cards called by declarer then retracted.
Legal Seagull, Richmond, Va.
|
Taking your second question first: a card called for declarer but retracted in the same breath can be changed. The director should make that a high hurdle to cross, though. A dropped card – one that was clearly not intended to be played — should be retracted without penalty, though a defender may create unauthorized information for his partner in the process. Finally: to simplify what the laws says, a card held by a defender such that it can be seen by his partner should be deemed played, whereas a card is played by declarer when it touches the table.
Do you like the use of coded nines and tens in suit or no-trump play by the defense? By this I mean that both on opening lead and in mid-play, tens and nines show zero or two high honors.
Rosetta Stone, Levittown, Pa.
On opening lead my experience has been that declarer gains more from these methods than third hand. Conversely, in mid-play a defender should be able to work out when not to give away unnecessary information to declarer, so that their use makes reasonable sense.
How can I differentiate between the times to overcall in a moderate five-card suit and when to double or pass? The hand that triggered this issue was that I held: ♠ K-10-3, ♥ K-9-6-5, ♦ K-10-9-8-5, ♣ 3, and was not sure what to do over an opening call of one club on my right.
Wonder Woman, Durham, N.C.
Your hand poses an awkward problem. With minimum values and a five-card suit, I am happy to overcall, especially in a major. But with five diamonds and 4-3 in the other suits I would lean towards doubling if I had another queen. Action here is surely right; get in while you can – the quick and dirty approach is safest and most effective.
|
April 18th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 7 Comments
Pray for the repose of his soul. He was so tired.
Baron Corvo
| North |
North |
| North-South |
♠ 7 5 4
♥ 9
♦ A Q J 6 2
♣ K Q 10 9 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q J 3 2
♥ Q 7
♦ K 9 7 3
♣ 7 6 5 |
♠ K 9 8 6
♥ A 5 4
♦ 8 5
♣ A 8 3 2 |
| South |
♠ A 10
♥ K J 10 8 6 3 2
♦ 10 4
♣ J 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1♦ |
Dbl. |
| 4♥ |
All pass |
|
|
♠Q
When passed for penalties on an auction of this sort, you should run, rather than sit it out. One possibility is to bid one spade, but you have no real certainty this will be much better. One alternative is to redouble, planning to sit for one heart if partner bids it, or to redouble one diamond if that is where he escapes to.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K 9 8 6
♥ A 5 4
♦ 8 5
♣ A 8 3 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
Pass |
Pass |
| 1♣ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
April 17th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 2 Comments
In life we have to size up the chances and calculate the possible risks and our ability to deal with them and then make our plans accordingly.
Freya North
| West |
North |
| Both |
♠ 9 8
♥ J 6 3
♦ 10 7 5 4 2
♣ K 8 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ 10 6 5 4
♥ 9
♦ A
♣ A Q J 9 5 3 2 |
♠ 7 2
♥ K Q 8 7 5 2
♦ Q 9 8
♣ 10 6 |
| South |
♠ A K Q J 3
♥ A 10 4
♦ K J 6 3
♣ 7 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1♣ |
Pass |
1♥ |
| Dbl. |
3♣ |
Pass |
Pass |
| 3♠ |
Pass |
4♠ |
All pass |
♦A
Unless you have specifically agreed to the contrary, a new suit here is natural and forcing, so you cannot pass. One option is to rebid three hearts (which I would do with better heart intermediates) but as it is, I think it is better to temporize with a call of three diamonds. That might be what partner needs to hear to bid no-trump, or it might allow him to suggest heart tolerance.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 7 2
♥ K Q 8 7 5 2
♦ Q 9 8
♣ 10 6 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 2♥ |
Pass |
3♣ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
April 16th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 10 Comments
The subject of oratory alone is not truth, but persuasion.
Lord Macaulay
| South |
North |
| Both |
♠ 8 4 3
♥ 6 2
♦ K J 7 6 5 4
♣ 8 6 |
| West |
East |
♠ 9 6 5 2
♥ J 10 9 7 3
♦ —
♣ A 7 5 3 |
♠ Q J 10 7
♥ 8 5 4
♦ A 10 9 2
♣ K 2 |
| South |
♠ A K
♥ A K Q
♦ Q 8 3
♣ Q J 10 9 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 2 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
♥J
I’m not going to tell you that you will never miss game if you pass two hearts. Very occasionally your side will be able to make game. But once you have a strong no-trump to your right, game can hardly be laydown, and additionally you don’t want to stop partner from balancing in these auctions. Pass, and apologize later if you are wrong.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ Q J 10 7
♥ 8 5 4
♦ A 10 9 2
♣ K 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
1 NT |
| Pass |
Pass |
2♥ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
April 15th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 11 Comments
His life was gentle and the elements so mixed in him that nature might stand up and say to all the world, this was a man.
William Shakespeare
| South |
North |
| Both |
♠ J 8
♥ J 10 3
♦ K 10 5 4 2
♣ 9 8 7 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q 6 4 3
♥ 8 6
♦ 8 3
♣ A Q J 10 3 |
♠ 10 5 2
♥ Q 9 5 2
♦ A 9 6
♣ 6 4 2 |
| South |
♠ A K 9 7
♥ A K 7 4
♦ Q J 7
♣ K 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 2 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
♣Q
I tend to respond one no-trump for both strategic and tactical reasons with hands like this. We will occasionally get too high, but I feel the necessity to keep the opponents from getting their act together is well worth the occasional investment. Using a forcing no-trump is helpful here, since when followed with a heart preference it is entirely consistent with these values.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ J 8
♥ J 10 3
♦ K 10 5 4 2
♣ 9 8 7 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1♥ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
April 14th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
When people will not wed their own minds, they are apt to be overrun with nettles.
Horace Walpole
| North |
North |
| Neither |
♠ A 9 6 3 2
♥ A 3
♦ A 9 5
♣ J 6 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ K 10 8 7 5
♥ 6
♦ Q 10 7 4
♣ 10 9 8 |
♠ J 4
♥ Q 8 4 2
♦ 8 6
♣ A K 7 5 4 |
| South |
♠ Q
♥ K J 10 9 7 5
♦ K J 3 2
♣ Q 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1♠ |
Pass |
| 2♥ |
Pass |
2♠ |
Pass |
| 3♥ |
Pass |
4♥ |
All pass |
♣10
The three club call should be a very good hand — and it should not be a limit or game-forcing hand in spades, since with that you would bid spades or jump descriptively to the four-level. Initially I’d expect partner to want me to bid three no-trump with a diamond stopper, but you are way too good for that action. Cuebid four clubs and find out what your partner wants to do next.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A 9 6 3 2
♥ A 3
♦ A 9 5
♣ J 6 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1♦ |
Pass |
| 1♠ |
2♣ |
3♣ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
April 13th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Monday, March 30th, 2015
To most people nothing is more troublesome than the effort of thinking.
James Bryce
| East |
North |
| Neither |
♠ K 5 4
♥ Q 10 8
♦ A K 6 2
♣ A K 5 |
| West |
East |
♠ 3
♥ J 5 4 3 2
♦ 5 4
♣ J 10 9 8 6 |
♠ A 10 9 8 7 2
♥ 7 6
♦ J 9 8 7
♣ 7 |
| South |
♠ Q J 6
♥ A K 9
♦ Q 10 3
♣ Q 4 3 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
2♠ |
| Pass |
Pass |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| 3 NT |
Pass |
4 NT |
Pass |
| 6 NT |
All pass |
|
|
♣J
Declarer rates to have the top end of a strong no-trump with four spades and most likely five clubs, with either two cards in each red suit or a singleton diamond and three hearts. Meanwhile, dummy rates to have only three clubs, as he did not revert to three clubs, perhaps with five diamonds. Since West did not try one no-trump at his second turn, I’d go after hearts as our most likely source of tricks.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 7 3
♥ A 8 5 2
♦ J 6 3
♣ Q 10 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
Pass |
1♣ |
| Pass |
1♦ |
Pass |
1♠ |
| Pass |
2♣ |
Pass |
2 NT |
| All pass |
|
|
|
April 12th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 3 Comments
|
What does the Sandwich no-trump mean — and would you advocate playing it?
Dave in the Deli, Macon, Ga.
Bidding in sandwich seat refers to being in fourth seat when both opponents have acted. Some play that a one no-trump call shows the two unbid suits. But since you could double or jump to two no-trump to show hands of this general shape, the bid of one no-trump here should be reserved for balanced hands of, say, 16-19 points. As a passed hand, one no-trump must be unusual.
I disagreed with my partner who held: ♠ K-Q-10, ♥ A-10-9-8-6, ♦ —, ♣ A-10-9-5-3, when a weak two diamonds opening was passed round. He bid two hearts, and I passed, holding five small spades and a singleton diamond. My sole assets were king-queen-fifth of diamonds! What are the merits of two hearts as opposed to double?
Soupy Susan, Salinas, Calif.
I took a small sample here. My panel is split between pass and double.
The downside of double is that we play spades when we belong in a round-suit; any other action from partner will be more than welcome. So I vote for double, but I think it is close.
I am never confident what to do as opener when my partner raises my second suit. For example, holding: ♠ K, ♥ K-Q-7-3-2, ♦ A-5-2, ♣ K-9-7-2, I heard my partner respond one spade to my one heart opening, then raise my two club rebid to three. Was I supposed to pass or drive to three no-trump?
Jack Sprat, North Bay, Ontario
|
Partner sometimes produces a courtesy raise with four trumps and nine HCP or so, but you should not assume that to be the case. Rather than going to three no-trump, I’d temporize with the fourth suit, three diamonds, hoping partner can produce heart support. Or perhaps he can bid three no-trump himself — which might be a good idea if he had the doubleton diamond queen or the king-jack of diamonds.
When your partner opens a major-suit and the next hand doubles, how do you deal with all the hands in the range of 4-10 HCP with three or four trumps? The vocabulary of raising or jump raising seems a bit impoverished!
Dromedary, Tupelo, Miss.
Simplest is to play the jump raise as rather weaker than normal. However, with a high-card limit raise or better, jump to two no-trump, a scheme known as known as “Jordan” or “Truscott”. Incidentally, some people also play a two-club response after the double as purely artificial, showing 7-9 points and three trumps, thus letting the simple raise suggest 4-6 points. I like this idea.
After you hear one heart to your right you hold: ♠ A-K-Q-2, ♥ 5-3-2, ♦ K-Q-5-3, ♣ 9-4, and have to decide on a call. My partner said I must pass because I don’t have a five-card suit for an overcall, can’t bid NT because I have no stoppers in hearts and clubs, and can’t double because I can’t support all unbid suits. What’s the best solution?
Side-show Bob, Muncie, Ind.
Double is not perfect but certainly almost palatable. Sometimes partners don’t bid clubs, sometimes they have six of them. Overcalling one spade is also acceptable, but switch the diamonds and spades and double is clear — for me. There are many who require the perfect hand to double but as I get older and the number of deals left for me to play goes down, I bid when I can. I may not get another chance…
|
April 11th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
The secret of genius is to carry the spirit of the child into old age, which means never losing your enthusiasm.
Aldous Huxley
| South |
North |
| Both |
♠ 10 9 2
♥ J 9
♦ K 9 8 5 4
♣ 6 5 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ K 5
♥ Q 10 8 7
♦ Q J 7 2
♣ Q J 2 |
♠ Q 8 7 3
♥ K 5 4
♦ A 6
♣ 10 9 7 3 |
| South |
♠ A J 6 4
♥ A 6 3 2
♦ 10 3
♣ A K 8 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 NT |
All pass |
|
|
♦2
Without the competition to two diamonds your raise to two hearts would suggest extras (maybe 16-18 and four trumps). In competition the call could easily be made on any shape-suitable double with four trumps. Does that mean you should do more here? No it does not. You are close to a maximum for your call but certainly within range – and partner can bid on with hopes of game.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A J 6 4
♥ A 6 3 2
♦ 10 3
♣ A K 8 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
1♦ |
| Dbl. |
Pass |
1♥ |
2♦ |
| ? |
|
|
|
April 10th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 2 Comments
The old know what they want; the young are sad and bewildered.
Logan Pearsall Smith
| South |
North |
| Both |
♠ 10 9 3
♥ A K
♦ 10 8 7 4
♣ K 7 6 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ J 7 4
♥ 10 9 7 4
♦ 9 6 3
♣ Q 10 3 |
♠ Q 8 5
♥ Q 8 5 3 2
♦ A J 5
♣ J 8 |
| South |
♠ A K 6 2
♥ J 6
♦ K Q 2
♣ A 9 5 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
♥10
The modern style (which I certainly would not insist you play) is to use all jump raises facing an opening or overcall in competition as shapely, not based on an invitation in high cards. But I would not bid three hearts here at any vulnerability. You are not just weak with a square distribution, you have all your assets – such as they are – in the side suits. A simple raise to two hearts should more than suffice.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ J 7 4
♥ 10 9 8 4
♦ J 9 3
♣ Q 10 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1♦ |
1♥ |
Dbl. |
| ? |
|
|
|
|
For many years the three major US tournaments, the Vanderbilt, Spingold, and Reisinger were used as qualifying events for the US trials, so the fields effectively consisted only of American players. When the trials opened up to everyone, about 20 years ago, foreign players started to come in greater numbers to the US national tournaments.
As the events got stronger (they are basically the equivalent of world championships now) foreign winners started to emerge. But it took until 2008 for a Polish team to win the Vanderbilt, and their performance was even more impressive when you consider that they played throughout as a team of four.
But, of course, when you play every board, you will not get everything right. Krzysztof Martens showed me this deal to indicate how tiredness can get the better of everybody. Four hearts is not a great spot — especially on a spade lead. Martens took his spade ace and played on diamonds by taking the finesse. East ruffed the third round, so Martens overruffed and played a club to the king, which held the trick. Then a heart towards the king left the defenders no chance.
The defenders could and should have prevailed by winning the club ace and under-leading in spades to allow the lead of the fourth diamond, ruffed with the heart ace. That promotes the heart queen to the setting trick. And declarer could and should have countered that by discarding his spade on the third diamond.