April 9th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
You have to keep a watch on the Swiss.
Anonymous
| East |
North |
| North-South |
♠ A
♥ A 10 8 4
♦ K 7 4
♣ A J 7 6 5 |
| West |
East |
♠ 8 6 2
♥ K J 7 5 2
♦ J 8 6 5 3
♣ — |
♠ K J 10 5 3
♥ 6
♦ A
♣ Q 10 9 4 3 2 |
| South |
♠ Q 9 7 4
♥ Q 9 3
♦ Q 10 9 2
♣ K 8 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
1♣ |
| Pass |
1♥ |
Pass |
1♠ |
| Pass |
Pass |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| 1 NT |
2♦ |
Dbl. |
2♠ |
| 2 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
♠8
You have a choice here. You can simply raise to two hearts, a relatively wide-ranging action in competition, or you can double for take-out. With three hearts and limited values, I think I will settle for the raise. Switch the hearts and clubs and the double stands out, and equally, with an extra king, doubling gets the high cards across nicely.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 9 7 4
♥ Q 9 3
♦ Q 10 9 2
♣ K 8 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1♣ |
1♥ |
2♣ |
| ? |
|
|
|
April 8th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
From recovery to rags and rags to recovery symbolizes art — a perfect compilation of human imperfections.
Chris Jami
| West |
North |
| North-South |
♠ A K 8 7
♥ A Q 5 3
♦ Q 6 3
♣ 4 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ 6 4 2
♥ J 2
♦ —
♣ K J 9 8 7 6 5 2 |
♠ J 10 9 3
♥ K 10 8
♦ K 9 8 7
♣ Q 10 |
| South |
♠ Q 5
♥ 9 7 6 4
♦ A J 10 5 4 2
♣ A |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
3 NT* |
Dbl. |
5♣ |
| 5♦ |
All pass |
|
|
*A minor-suit preempt
♣8
Despite the two aces I’m not sure I want to defend here. Immediate action suggests a minimum hand and a minimum in high cards and defense, so I guess I would bid two diamonds. (Yes, if you pass and partner doubles now, you might elect to defend, but you may not be able to describe your hand accurately if he does anything else.)
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 5
♥ 9 7 6 4
♦ A J 10 5 4 2
♣ A |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♦ |
Dbl. |
Rdbl. |
1♠ |
| ? |
|
|
|
April 7th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
He who desires but acts not, breeds pestilence.
William Blake
| South |
North |
| Both |
♠ J 6
♥ A 8 6 4
♦ A 7
♣ K Q 9 8 5 |
| West |
East |
♠ 5 3
♥ K 9 2
♦ J 10 8 5 2
♣ A 10 2 |
♠ K 8 2
♥ J 10 7
♦ K Q 9 4
♣ J 6 3 |
| South |
♠ A Q 10 9 7 4
♥ Q 5 3
♦ 6 3
♣ 7 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 2♠ |
Pass |
4♠ |
All pass |
♦J
An easy one this morning. Rather than rebid a five-card club suit, however chunky it might appear, it is almost always better to rebid one no-trump, and since you do have a quasi-balanced minimum with stoppers in both red suits, that shouldn’t be too painful. And just for the record, a call of two hearts is a reverse, since it forces partner to the three-level to give preference to clubs, and shows 17+ with this shape.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ J 6
♥ A 8 6 4
♦ A 7
♣ K Q 9 8 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♣ |
Pass |
1♠ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
April 6th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 12 Comments
Judge not according to the appearance.
The book of John
| West |
North |
| Both |
♠ Q 6 5
♥ K J 4 2
♦ —
♣ A K Q J 10 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ A 10 4
♥ 10 9 5 3
♦ K Q 9 3 2
♣ 6 |
♠ J 9 7 3
♥ 6
♦ A 8 7 6
♣ 9 8 4 3 |
| South |
♠ K 8 2
♥ A Q 8 7
♦ J 10 5 4
♣ 7 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
1♣ |
Pass |
| 1♥ |
2♦ |
4♦ |
5♦ |
| 6♥ |
All pass |
|
|
♦K
Since you have raised diamonds, and are relatively unlikely to hold two small cards in that suit, it feels right to lead the seven. By suggesting no honor in that suit, you make it easier for your partner not only to prevent declarer sneaking through a singleton honor, but also to find a shift if necessary.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ 9 7 5 4
♥ A Q 7 3
♦ 7 5 2
♣ J 6 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
2♦ |
Dbl. |
| 3♦ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
4♠ |
| All pass |
|
|
|
April 5th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
|
Could you give me your instinctive reaction as to whether, or when, defenders ought to signal their length in the suit declarer is playing on? I have encountered partners who insist on being given such information, and those who claim to know better than me what is in my hand.
Helping Hans, Lorain, Ohio
My feeling is that while one must give count when helping partner work out when to win or duck an honor, those situations are the exceptions. And one tends to know them when one sees them without needing to make a firm agreement on when to give count. The weaker the declarer, the more inclined you should be to give count. And the weaker your partner, the less information you should give him; he will not notice anyway!
In third seat I held: ♠ A-Q-7-3, ♥ Q-8-6-5-3, ♦ 2, ♣ Q-10-2. I responded one heart to my partner’s one diamond opening bid. When he raised to two hearts was I supposed to invite game by bidding three hearts? I can see arguments for doing both more or less!
Levelling Out, Casper, Wyo.
The hand is not good enough to drive to game, but passing seems a little tame. Rather than pass the buck to partner with a call of three hearts, you might bid two spades. That suggests this sort of hand-pattern, and lets partner look at his cards and evaluate his range and degree of fit.
What is your view on concealing a four-card spade suit in response to a one heart opening bid? Under what circumstances might this be acceptable?
Rose Red, Tempe, Ariz.
|
I assume you do not play Flannery (a two-diamond or two-heart opening to show four spades and five hearts) when a response of one spade would almost guarantee five. You should not bid a four-card spade suit when you have three hearts, in any range up to a limit bid, since otherwise when you support hearts, your partner will expect you to have a doubleton heart.
I assume you would not open this 11-count in first or second seat: ♠ A-9-4, ♥ J-3, ♦ K-J-7-2, ♣ Q-9-5-3? What about in third or fourth seat? And would the vulnerability affect your decision?
Quicksilver, Nashville, Tenn.
I see no reason to open in first or second seat. But in third seat a one diamond lead directing opening bid seems to make reasonable sense – at any vulnerability.
Several of our bridge group are elderly and reneges do happen from time to time. Would you list the different possibilities for penalties after a renege happens?
Slippery Sam, Durango, Colo.
If you did not take the trick and your side won no others, there is no penalty. If you took the revoke trick and no others, the penalty is one trick. If you did not take the trick but subsequently won one or more tricks, then the penalty is one trick. If you won the revoke trick with the illegally played card, (typically by trumping or overtrumping in error) AND your side won a subsequent trick, the penalty is two tricks. A tournament director may always adjust the score if equity has not been restored by the penalty.
|
April 4th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
I am a mystery wrapped in an enigma wrapped in a pita. Why the pita? That counts as another mystery.
Demetri Martin
| West |
North |
| Neither |
♠ 5 4 2
♥ J 10 9 7
♦ K 6 5 3
♣ 7 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q
♥ A Q 8 4 2
♦ 10 7 2
♣ K 6 5 3 |
♠ J 10 9 7
♥ 5
♦ J 9 8 4
♣ J 10 9 8 |
| South |
♠ A K 8 6 3
♥ K 6 3
♦ A Q
♣ A Q 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1♥ |
Pass |
1♠ |
| Dbl. |
2♣ |
Pass |
Pass |
| 2 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
♣3
Your partner’s double is take-out, but does not guarantee perfect shape — he might have only two diamonds or be 3-3 in the red-suits. Still, you do not want to select clubs and miss an eight-card fit. I would bid two no-trumps as a scramble rather than as an attempt to play there, expecting partner to pick his better minor in context. I can then correct three clubs to three diamonds to let him pick a red suit.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 5 4 2
♥ J 10 9 7
♦ K 6 5 3
♣ 7 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1♠ |
2♣ |
2♠ |
| Pass |
Pass |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
April 3rd, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 10 Comments
In a serious struggle there is no worse cruelty than to be magnanimous at an inopportune time.
Leon Trotsky
| South |
North |
| East-West |
♠ A
♥ A 9 4 2
♦ A K 7 5 3
♣ Q 6 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ 10 8 7 2
♥ 10 7 6
♦ 9 2
♣ J 10 8 5 |
♠ K J 9 5 3
♥ K Q 8
♦ Q 10 4
♣ 9 2 |
| South |
♠ Q 6 4
♥ J 5 3
♦ J 8 6
♣ A K 7 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♦ |
Pass |
2♦ |
2♠ |
| 2 NT |
Pass |
3♠ |
Pass |
| 4♣ |
Pass |
4♦ |
Pass |
| 5♦ |
All pass |
|
|
♠2
The general rule in responding to one club is to bid majors first on any hand that is invitational or weaker in strength. But with any game-force you should bid your suits in their natural order. So here, with such good diamonds and relatively weak hearts, you do not want to distort your hand by bidding your weaker and shorter suit first. Respond one diamond.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A
♥ A 9 4 2
♦ A K 7 5 3
♣ Q 6 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1♣ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
April 2nd, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 5 Comments
There are occasions when it is undoubtedly better to incur loss than to make gain.
Plautus
| North |
North |
| Neither |
♠ 9 5
♥ A Q 8 5 2
♦ A K 9 7 3
♣ A |
| West |
East |
♠ J 10 8 6 4 3 2
♥ J 7 3
♦ —
♣ J 8 3 |
♠ K Q
♥ 9
♦ J 10 8 6 4 2
♣ K 10 7 4 |
| South |
♠ A 7
♥ K 10 6 4
♦ Q 5
♣ Q 9 6 5 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1♣* |
Pass |
| 1♥** |
2♠ |
3♥ |
3♠ |
| 4 NT |
Pass |
5♦ |
Pass |
| 6♥ |
All pass |
|
|
*Strong
**8-11 high-card points
♠8
I am all for preempting when I have a reasonable excuse, and especially in first seat, which is the ideal moment to put the cat amongst the pigeons. But here you have no excuse to bid, with tricks galore outside your weak long suit. It might work to preempt, but the odds are against it, and you destroy partnership trust that way.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K Q
♥ 9
♦ J 10 8 6 4 2
♣ K 10 7 4 |
April 1st, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 9 Comments
There are always loose ends in real life.
Robert Galbraith
| West |
North |
| Neither |
♠ J 9 5
♥ J 8 6 3
♦ A J 10 7
♣ K Q |
| West |
East |
♠ 8
♥ 7 5 4 2
♦ K 9 4 2
♣ A 10 8 4 |
♠ Q 7 6 3 2
♥ —
♦ Q 8 5 3
♣ J 7 6 5 |
| South |
♠ A K 10 4
♥ A K Q 10 9
♦ 6
♣ 9 3 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
1♣* |
Pass |
| 1♥ |
Pass |
2♥ |
Pass |
| 4♦ |
Pass |
5♣ |
Pass |
| 6♥ |
All pass |
|
|
*Two-plus cards
♦2
When you have opened on skinny values and are facing a passed hand, there is always a temptation to pass partner’s response. Here the attractions of doing so are that you have a reasonable fit and are not especially worried about keeping the opponents out. You have the other major under control, so simply pass and hope to stay low.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ J 9 5
♥ J 8 6 3
♦ A J 10 7
♣ K Q |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
Pass |
Pass |
| 1♦ |
Pass |
1♠ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
March 31st, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
Scenery is fine — but human nature is finer.
John Keats
| North |
North |
| Both |
♠ 10 9 3
♥ A K Q 3
♦ A K J 7 2
♣ 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ A 6
♥ 10 7 6 5
♦ 9 6 5 4
♣ A J 10 |
♠ K 8 5 2
♥ J 4 2
♦ 10 8 3
♣ Q 8 6 |
| South |
♠ Q J 7 4
♥ 9 8
♦ Q
♣ K 9 7 5 4 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1♦ |
Pass |
| 1♠ |
Pass |
2♥ |
Pass |
| 2 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
♥5
With such shortage in diamonds, you would assume your LHO is about to repeat his diamonds. It feels right to get involved as soon as you can do so, by introducing your club suit now. Yes, you would rather have a better suit, but as a passed hand your partner ought not to play you for the earth.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ Q J 7 4
♥ 9 8
♦ Q
♣ K 9 7 5 4 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| Pass |
1♦ |
1♥ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
|
In important events these days you can watch the experts on the internet, but you can also attend the tournament and watch them play live on close-circuit TV, with commentators watching the players’ every move.
Today’s deal was played under just such conditions 50 years ago by Montreal expert Sam Gold. He was able to outplay the analysts, who of course could see all four hands.
Gold had done well in the auction, since he reached a vulnerable game with decent chances rather than trying for a penalty double of two spades, a contract that is hard to defeat by more than one trick, even after a trump lead. But while Gold was planning his play in three no-trumps, the commentators said that finding the right line to bring home nine tricks would be beyond most people. But Sam proved them wrong.
After winning dummy’s spade ace, a low diamond went to East’s ace, more or less confirming him to have singletons in each red suit. East returned the spade jack to Gold’s queen, and Sam next ran the diamond 10 through West. When this held the trick, a diamond was led to the king, and the heart ace cashed, removing East’s lone heart.
Now Gold came back to his hand with a top club, and took his master diamond for his seventh trick. When he exited with a high spade, East could score his three remaining spades, but then had to lead into the club tenace in dummy and concede nine tricks.