June 9th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
But as I raved and grew more fierce and wild At every word, Methought I heard one calling ‘Child’.
George Herbert
| S |
North |
| N-S |
♠ J 10 8
♥ A K 3
♦ 9 7
♣ A Q 5 3 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ 9 5 3
♥ 10 8 6 5 2
♦ 10 2
♣ K 7 6 |
♠ 4
♥ Q J 9 4
♦ K Q J 5 4 3
♣ J 10 |
| South |
♠ A K Q 7 6 2
♥ 7
♦ A 8 6
♣ 9 8 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
2 ♣ |
3 ♦ |
| 3 ♠ |
Pass |
4 ♥ |
Pass |
| 5 ♦ |
Pass |
5 ♥ |
Pass |
| 6 ♠ |
Pass |
7 ♠ |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♦10
There is room for discussion as to what is right here. Some would rebid two clubs (unattractive with a five-card suit) some will rebid one no-trump — equally unattractive with a small doubleton in a side suit, to my mind. I prefer to raise to two spades, judging my good trump intermediates and sidesuit doubleton to offer as much as any four-card trump holding in a balanced hand.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ J 10 8
♥ A K 3
♦ 9 7
♣ A Q 5 3 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♣ |
Pass |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
June 8th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 7 Comments
Survival is nothing more than recovery.
Dianne Feinstein
| S |
North |
| Both |
♠ Q 10 8 5
♥ K 9 7
♦ 7 6 5 3
♣ 10 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ J 4 3
♥ Q 5 3
♦ J 9
♣ K 8 7 6 3 |
♠ 9 2
♥ 8 6 4 2
♦ A 10 8 2
♣ A 5 4 |
| South |
♠ A K 7 6
♥ A J 10
♦ K Q 4
♣ Q J 9 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 2 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♣6
My best guess is that diamonds offer a far more fertile chance to defeat the game here than do clubs. That being so, I will lead the diamond ace, prepared to surrender the overtrick at teams, from time to time, while maximizing my chance of leading the right minor, or perhaps shifting to clubs if the play to trick one makes continuing diamonds impractical.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 7 6 4 3
♥ 10 8
♦ A Q 3
♣ 5 3 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
1 ♠ |
| Pass |
2 ♥ |
Pass |
2 NT |
| Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
|
June 7th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 8 Comments
|
I am often puzzled as to whether it is better to pass information to partner at the risk of helping declarer out. For instance where do you stand on ‘coded nines and 10’s’ against no-trump? In this scenario a jack denies a higher honor. What about whether to lead from a four-card suit with the small card the two, making it clear you had just four cards, as opposed to a four-card suit with the small card the three or four?
Full Marks, Detroit, Mich.
I’m not prejudiced against but rather in favor of leading deuces. The reason is that at least my partner won’t wrongly continue the suit, playing me for five when I only have four. But I prefer not to lead coded nines and 10s at trick one. I do find them too revealing, but when dummy is visible, the risks of the coded leads diminishes greatly.
I have seen you mention in passing that one should apply a different minimum standard for a vulnerable preempt, as opposed to what is required at favorable vulnerability. Could you discuss this a little further?
Minnie Mouse, Raleigh, N.C.
Non-vulnerable preempts in third or even first seat my standards are low. I don’t like to preempt on bad suits either with side defense or with a good second suit, but other than that, anything goes. By contrast, when vulnerable in second seat my preempts are by the book. I might allow myself a little more latitude in other seats vulnerable, or in second seat non-vulnerable – when I have only one opponent to worry about.
Do you have any predictions for the success of the US men, women and seniors in the next world championships?
Nostradamus, San Antonio, Texas
|
The USA women and seniors are always going to be in serious contention for the gold medal. They rate to be about even money for a gold or silver medal. The open team is pretty much a crap-shoot. I’d guess we are favorites for a bronze medal, an outsider for the gold or silver medal, because so many teams are truly at the top level, and playing full-time these days.
I was in second chair with: ♠ A-7-4-2, ♥ K-Q-3, ♦ 4, ♣ K-Q-10-8-4, and doubled my LHO’s one diamond call. My partner jumped to two hearts and the next hand bid three diamonds. Do you agree with my decision to pass now, and to pass my partner’s double of three diamonds? This was not a success!
Missing Link, Fredericksburg, Va.
With only three trumps you should not raise hearts. Your partner will expect you to have four trumps to raise here. I have to admit that I would pass the double just like you did, and wonder whether maybe my partner was at fault here for his double.
With ♠ A-Q-6-4-3, ♥ Q-4, ♦ A-Q-7-4 ♣ J-4 I assume you would overcall one spade over one club rather than doubling? If you do that, your LHO bids one no-trump and the auction is passed back to you. Do you bid or pass now?
It Takes Two to Tango, Little Rock, Ark.
Rightly or wrongly I would not pass at my second turn. I’d guess to bid two diamonds, conscious that I have no guarantee of a fit, but feeling that I have too many high cards to pass. I admit this could easily be wrong.
|
June 6th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
Under the bludgeonings of chance My head is bloody but unbowed.
W. E. Henley
| W |
North |
| None |
♠ K 8 5 4
♥ J 5 2
♦ K J 2
♣ A 7 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ 7 6 3
♥ A Q 10 8 4 3
♦ 5
♣ K 8 4 |
♠ 10 2
♥ 9
♦ Q 10 9 6 3
♣ Q J 6 5 3 |
| South |
♠ A Q J 9
♥ K 7 6
♦ A 8 7 4
♣ 10 9 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
2 ♥ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| 4 ♠ |
All pass |
|
|
♦5
A simple raise here shows 12-14 and three or four trumps (with a guarantee of four trumps if a support double is available to show a three-card raise). Yes, you do have a decent hand, but with the heart king devalued because of the overcall to your left, a raise to two spades is quite sufficient, and a call of three spades would be a pronounced overbid.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A Q J 9
♥ K 7 6
♦ A 8 7 4
♣ 10 9 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♦ |
1 ♥ |
1 ♠ |
2 ♥ |
| ? |
|
|
|
June 5th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 23 Comments
I’ll love you till the ocean Is folded and hung up to dry.
W. H. Auden
| S |
North |
| N-S |
♠ —
♥ A K J 10 2
♦ K 10 8 7
♣ A 7 6 5 |
| West |
East |
♠ K 4 3
♥ 7 5
♦ J 9 6 2
♣ J 10 9 3 |
♠ A Q 10 9 7 2
♥ 6 4 3
♦ 3
♣ Q 8 2 |
| South |
♠ J 8 6 5
♥ Q 9 8
♦ A Q 5 4
♣ K 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♦ |
Pass |
1 ♥ |
2 ♠ |
| Pass |
3 ♠ |
4 ♠ |
Pass |
| 5 ♥ |
Pass |
6 ♦ |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♠K
Yes, your partner has denied primary spade support and indicated a good suit of his own. But it is still completely impractical to consider passing when a singleton trump in support may be more than enough to allow you to hold your spade losers to one. Rebid two spades, suggesting a six-carder, and at least moderate values, and let partner take it from there.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A Q 10 9 7 2
♥ 6 4 3
♦ 3
♣ Q 8 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♦ |
Pass |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
2 ♦ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
June 4th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 9 Comments
I have hardly ever known a mathematician who was capable of reasoning.
Plato
| S |
North |
| Both |
♠ A K 9 4 3
♥ A 6 5
♦ 10 6 4
♣ K Q |
| West |
East |
♠ 2
♥ 10 9 8 7 2
♦ Q 9 8
♣ 9 7 5 4 |
♠ J 10 7 6 5
♥ J 3
♦ K J 2
♣ 10 6 2 |
| South |
♠ Q 8
♥ K Q 4
♦ A 7 5 3
♣ A J 8 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
2 ♥ |
Pass |
| 2 ♠ |
Pass |
4 NT* |
Pass |
| 6 NT |
All pass |
|
|
*Quantitative
♥10
This is largely about personal style, but for me, with the same hand but my long suit either hearts or diamonds, an overcall feels right. I’d worry that doubling would lose my ability in competition to get my suit in. With my actual hand, it is a toss-up. I could either double or bid one spade, down-valuing my clubs. Equally, with a small club instead of a diamond, I would surely upgrade the hand to a double.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A K 9 4 3
♥ A 6 5
♦ 10 6 4
♣ K Q |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
1 ♣ |
| ? |
|
|
|
June 3rd, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 7 Comments
An umbrella is of no avail against a Scotch mist.
J. R. Lowell
| W |
North |
| None |
♠ A 9
♥ 9 8 6 5
♦ K Q 10
♣ A K J 5 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q J 7 6 4
♥ Q
♦ 7 6 3
♣ 10 8 6 2 |
♠ K 8
♥ A 10 7 4
♦ J 8 5 4
♣ Q 4 3 |
| South |
♠ 10 5 3 2
♥ K J 3 2
♦ A 9 2
♣ 9 7 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
1 ♣ |
Pass |
| 1 ♥ |
Pass |
4 ♥ |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♠Q
One possibility is to cuebid two clubs to get partner to pick a major, but I believe you are about a queen short of an invitational sequence. I think I prefer the simple route of bidding one spade, planning to compete to two hearts when given an opportunity, so as to get both suits in economically. If the auction stops in one spade we will not have missed game.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 10 5 3 2
♥ K J 3 2
♦ A 9 2
♣ 9 7 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♣ |
Dbl. |
1 ♦ |
| ? |
|
|
|
June 2nd, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 7 Comments
Among all forms of mistake, prophecy is the most gratuitous.
George Eliot
| S |
North |
| Both |
♠ 8 6
♥ 6
♦ A K 7 6 2
♣ Q J 9 7 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ 10 9 7 5 4 3
♥ K Q J 7 2
♦ 10
♣ 2 |
♠ K J 2
♥ A 10 9 4
♦ Q J 8 4 3
♣ 8 |
| South |
♠ A Q
♥ 8 5 3
♦ 9 5
♣ A K 10 6 5 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♣ |
2 ♣* |
3 ♦** |
4 ♣ |
| 4 ♠ |
Pass |
6 ♣ |
All pass |
*Michaels, showing at least five cards in each major
**Showing a club fit
♥K
You have a straightforward preference to two spades here, a call that is consistent with holding two spades rather than three, since you might jump in spades now with three (or have raised at your second turn with three decent trump). In context, therefore, your trump support is outstanding.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A Q
♥ 8 5 3
♦ 9 5
♣ A K 10 6 5 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♣ |
Pass |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
| 2 ♣ |
Pass |
2 ♥ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
June 1st, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
It has been my philosophy of life that difficulties vanish when faced boldly.
Isaac Asimov
| S |
North |
| Both |
♠ A 9 2
♥ Q J 6
♦ K J 8 6
♣ 10 5 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ J 6 5 3
♥ K 10 7 2
♦ Q 3
♣ K 4 2 |
♠ Q 10 8 7
♥ A 9 8 5 4
♦ —
♣ Q 9 8 6 |
| South |
♠ K 4
♥ 3
♦ A 10 9 7 5 4 2
♣ A J 7 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♦ |
Pass |
2 ♦* |
Pass |
| 3 ♣ |
Pass |
3 ♦ |
Pass |
| 5 ♦ |
All pass |
|
|
*At least an invitational raise
♥2
I would lead the diamond ace to try to get a force going on declarer, expecting him to have relatively short diamonds. Yes it might set up a diamond winner in dummy, but this is against the odds. And in any event a slow discard for declarer may not be critical.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ 9 4 2
♥ 10 7 6 3
♦ A 7 6 4
♣ K 8 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♦ |
1 ♥ |
| 2 ♦ |
2 ♥ |
3 ♦ |
3 ♥ |
| All pass |
|
|
|
May 31st, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 12 Comments
|
The law regarding dealing plainly states that cards will be dealt one at a time. Do you have any thoughts about back-and-forth dealing whereby 12 of the cards in two hands are dealt two at a time and the 13 in each of the other hands are dealt one at a time? I called a director about this at a regional tourney and was told it was all right. I dislike this, since many people do not shuffle “thoroughly” as that law states.
Given the Pip, Greenville, S.C.
I hate people who don’t deal in the regular fashion (some deal in five piles, others do the sort of thing you describe). That said, the lack of shuffling and irregular dealing are such small absurdities that I reserve my fire for the more serious infractions. I try to breathe deeply and let it pass over me.
How would you advance at your third turn here? I held: ♠ Q-6-4-3, ♥ A-Q-8-7-3, ♦ K-Q-3, ♣ A and opened one heart and heard a one spade response. I elected to jump to four clubs (though of course a small singleton would have been preferable) over the one spade call. My partner now bid four diamonds and I was not sure whether to sign off, use Blackwood or cuebid next.
Yellow Light, Ketchikan, Alaska
My view is that one more cue-bid of four hearts is quite sufficient. If your partner signs off in four spades, you will surely have done enough, given your very weak trumps, in context. If you had the spade jack you might be able to take control, but as it is I’d worry about the possibility of losing two trump tricks, unless partner can find a further call.
There are plenty of people at my club who are less than proficient in the use of the bidding box, some because they have a physical disability, some because they reveal their lack of confidence in their actions. Does any penalty arise if you take a bid out of the bidding box and then put it back? Does it matter if the action was accidental, or if you changed your mind?
Shifting Sands, San Luis Obispo, Calif.
|
You can normally correct a call selected by accident even if it is put on the table. (This applies even after a call by your LHO, though he then gets to change his call too). In some cases if you change your mind about a bid, you are allowed to correct it before the next call. However this may pass Unauthorized Information to your partner, and there might be further consequences. It is always best to call the director if something like this happens.
I have just retired from the legal profession and would like to consider joining a bridge club or find a regular card game for beginners. I loved playing bridge in college about 45 years ago but since then my activities have been limited to a friendly game of hold’em poker. Do you have any suggestions?
On the River, Miami, Fla.
Go to the ACBL website and you will be able to find details of neighboring clubs. Good luck and good hunting!
When my partner held: ♠ A-10-8-6-5-2, ♥ J-3, ♦ 10, ♣ A-J-9-4 yesterday, he did something I did not agree with. He responded one spade to my one diamond opening, and I now leapt to four spades. What if anything is best now?
Santa Claus, Muncie, Ind.
It would be hard to argue with driving to six spades. Facing a typical 18-19 balanced hand, (because you did not make a splinter jump) slam is likely to have play while reaching a grand slam looks unlikely. You could argue that a slower route may tell the opponents what to lead if you make a cuebid. And you may give them a chance to double a Blackwood response for the lead.
|
|
When this deal came up in the final set of a knock-out match the pair sitting North-South were some way behind, which might partly explain (if not fully justify) the reason that North jumped to the grand slam. He expected that his partner would have extras for his combination of the cuebid and jump to slam, and he was hoping that the auction had made the club finesse a favorite to succeed. In a sense he had done well, because if the club finesse had lost, even six spades would have been in jeopardy.
On the lead of the diamond 10, declarer could see that the club finesse was necessary but it was by no mean sufficient. He would also need clubs to break 3-2.
After winning the opening lead and drawing two rounds of trumps, declarer could cross his fingers and take the club finesse. Then he cashed the club ace, and after that declarer’s remaining club was thrown on dummy’s heart winner.
The clubs were ruffed out, and the last trump was drawn with dummy’s jack. Declarer found himself taking six trump tricks, two hearts, a diamond and four clubs, 13 in all.
Of course when he came to score up the board, North-South discovered that the pair in the other room had stopped in game, so all the additional effort was unnecessary. By the way, in six spades on a diamond lead it looks right simply to play for a diamond ruff in dummy and to take the club finesse.