|
What is your take on the merits of using a one no-trump overcall in the sandwich seat (between two bidding opponents) as natural and strong as opposed to artificial and the other two suits? And what about in balancing seat?
In the Hot Seat, North Bay, Ontario
Playing one no-trump here as artificial and two-suited is wrong because you already have two ways to show the unbid suits (by doubling or bidding two notrump). You should keep the bid by an unpassed hand as natural and 16-18 points. In balancing seat, by the way, you may be surprised to learn that experts without exception play the jump to two no-trump as strong and balanced – about a two no-trump opener, or a little less.
I held ♠ 9, ♥ A-J-7-4-3-2, ♦ K-7-3, ♣ Q-J-3, and responded two hearts to one spade. My partner had an ill-fitting 12-count and we ended up in three no-trump, down three when neither major behaved. Afterwards my partner suggested I did not have enough to force to game. I respectfully disagree; what say you?
Over the Top, Houston, Texas
This was a sensible choice by you. Your call of two hearts is just fine – you would open, so you should force to game. In a perfect world if rebidding your suit was not a game force you might go that way, but here it is a case of omelets and broken eggs. Occasionally ill-fitting hands with the approximate values for game will get too high. Shrug your shoulders and move on.
Recently you ran a deal where West overcalled two spades over one spade, without the sort of strength I’d expect for this call. What does the bid mean? I read it for short spades and a very strong hand so I did not understand what happened in the auction thereafter. Was it a misprint? Could West have bid two hearts rather than two spades?
Fall Guy, Doylestown, Pa.
|
My apologies, I should have put a footnote to say that the two spade call was a Michaels Cuebid, showing five hearts and five of a minor. (West’s call is often played this way, but a footnote was appropriate.) Sorry!
Playing the weak two bid, some of my regular game have been taught that the appropriate range is five to 10 points with a six-card suit, while others have been taught a range of six to 12 points. Which is correct?
Hi-Lo Countryman, Wilmington, N.C.
12 counts are REALLY exceptional for a 2-level bid, and 11-counts are fairly unusual, except when first or second in hand vulnerable. My general rule is that when you look at a 10-11 count with a six-carder, add on two points for the six-card suit and one for any side four-card suit. If and only if the total comes to 13, open at the one-level so long as you have an ace and a king, or three kings, or else some decent defense. Otherwise bid at the two-level.
How should one play a redouble of a cuebid in a slam-going auction? Should that promise first-round control or is it sufficient for that sequence to show second-round control?
Show and Tell, Elkhart, Ind.
My view is that the redouble should show first-round control (by either hand). A pass of the double by second hand should be constructive – some people play this sequence promises second-round control, and that is certainly sensible enough, though it requires agreement. Whether you play this way or not, reversion to the trump suit is the weakest option always, and a new cue-bid denies any control in the doubled suit.
|
At the 1996 trials the encounter between the teams captained by Edgar Kaplan and Howard Weinstein went down to the wire. With 32 boards to go Kaplan led by 19, but they lost the last two sets, and with them the match.
This board featured an unlikely game coming home with nine tricks. Weinstein doubled a weak two spade opening, and heard his partner bid two notrump — which the partnership played conventionally as a negative. This is an extension of the Lebensohl convention. Weinstein now guessed to raise to three notrump, giving his partner Ralph Katz the delight of playing the contract.
Katz won the opening spade lead in dummy, and immediately led a low heart to his hand, as East (Bart Bramley) ducked, to pass the diamond nine. Bramley won the diamond queen, and returned the club nine; Katz took his club queen, and played a heart to the ace and another heart.
Bramley took his king and got out with a low club, but Katz could win in dummy and throw Bramley in with his club winners. Bramley had two clubs to cash, but at trick 11 he was obliged to lead a diamond into dummy’s tenace for the contract, and a 10 IMP pick-up to Weinstein.
The trials were eventually won by the Robbins team, who defeated my squad in the semi-finals. They say you only remember your losses, not your victories. In this case, that is certainly true!