May 25th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 5 Comments
To fall into a habit is to begin to cease to be.
Miguel de Unamuno
| N |
North |
| Both |
♠ K 7 4
♥ J 5 4
♦ K Q 7 6 5
♣ 10 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q
♥ 3
♦ A J 8 4
♣ A 9 7 6 5 3 2 |
♠ J 10 9 8 2
♥ 10 7 6 2
♦ 9 3 2
♣ Q |
| South |
♠ A 6 5 3
♥ A K Q 9 8
♦ 10
♣ K J 8 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
Pass |
Pass |
| 1 ♥ |
2 ♣ |
2 ♥ |
Pass |
| 4 ♥ |
All pass |
|
|
♣A
In situations of this sort you tend to lead the unbid suit unless your holding is hugely unattractive or some other lead stands out. In this case while a heart lead might well cost a trick, it could also easily be the suit in which you need to set up tricks or cash out winners before they are discarded. Equally importantly, nothing else looks attractive either, a passive trump being the alternative.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ 6 4 2
♥ K 9 6 5
♦ Q 7 6 2
♣ J 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♦ |
Pass |
1 ♠ |
| Pass |
2 ♣ |
Pass |
3 ♠ |
| Pass |
4 ♠ |
All pass |
|
May 24th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 8 Comments
|
What is your take on the merits of using a one no-trump overcall in the sandwich seat (between two bidding opponents) as natural and strong as opposed to artificial and the other two suits? And what about in balancing seat?
In the Hot Seat, North Bay, Ontario
Playing one no-trump here as artificial and two-suited is wrong because you already have two ways to show the unbid suits (by doubling or bidding two notrump). You should keep the bid by an unpassed hand as natural and 16-18 points. In balancing seat, by the way, you may be surprised to learn that experts without exception play the jump to two no-trump as strong and balanced – about a two no-trump opener, or a little less.
I held ♠ 9, ♥ A-J-7-4-3-2, ♦ K-7-3, ♣ Q-J-3, and responded two hearts to one spade. My partner had an ill-fitting 12-count and we ended up in three no-trump, down three when neither major behaved. Afterwards my partner suggested I did not have enough to force to game. I respectfully disagree; what say you?
Over the Top, Houston, Texas
This was a sensible choice by you. Your call of two hearts is just fine – you would open, so you should force to game. In a perfect world if rebidding your suit was not a game force you might go that way, but here it is a case of omelets and broken eggs. Occasionally ill-fitting hands with the approximate values for game will get too high. Shrug your shoulders and move on.
Recently you ran a deal where West overcalled two spades over one spade, without the sort of strength I’d expect for this call. What does the bid mean? I read it for short spades and a very strong hand so I did not understand what happened in the auction thereafter. Was it a misprint? Could West have bid two hearts rather than two spades?
Fall Guy, Doylestown, Pa.
|
My apologies, I should have put a footnote to say that the two spade call was a Michaels Cuebid, showing five hearts and five of a minor. (West’s call is often played this way, but a footnote was appropriate.) Sorry!
Playing the weak two bid, some of my regular game have been taught that the appropriate range is five to 10 points with a six-card suit, while others have been taught a range of six to 12 points. Which is correct?
Hi-Lo Countryman, Wilmington, N.C.
12 counts are REALLY exceptional for a 2-level bid, and 11-counts are fairly unusual, except when first or second in hand vulnerable. My general rule is that when you look at a 10-11 count with a six-carder, add on two points for the six-card suit and one for any side four-card suit. If and only if the total comes to 13, open at the one-level so long as you have an ace and a king, or three kings, or else some decent defense. Otherwise bid at the two-level.
How should one play a redouble of a cuebid in a slam-going auction? Should that promise first-round control or is it sufficient for that sequence to show second-round control?
Show and Tell, Elkhart, Ind.
My view is that the redouble should show first-round control (by either hand). A pass of the double by second hand should be constructive – some people play this sequence promises second-round control, and that is certainly sensible enough, though it requires agreement. Whether you play this way or not, reversion to the trump suit is the weakest option always, and a new cue-bid denies any control in the doubled suit.
|
May 23rd, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 2 Comments
To elope is cowardly; it is running away from danger; and danger has become so rare in modern life.
Oscar Wilde
| S |
North |
| Both |
♠ J 10 6 4
♥ 5 3
♦ A 6 4 2
♣ Q 8 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q 8 2
♥ Q 9
♦ Q J 10 9 5
♣ A 10 7 |
♠ 3
♥ J 10 8 6 4
♦ K 7 3
♣ K J 9 5 |
| South |
♠ A K 9 7 5
♥ A K 7 2
♦ 8
♣ 6 3 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
2 ♠ |
Pass |
| 3 ♥ |
Pass |
4 ♠ |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♦Q
Your partner’s three heart call is a probe for no-trump. While you cannot bid no-trump yourself, you have a choice as to whether to bid four or five diamonds. The meaning of a jump to five diamonds depends a little on partnership style. I prefer not to play it simply as weak, more about a minimum with all my values in our bid suits. This hand qualifies for a five diamond bid either way.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ J 10 6 4
♥ 5 3
♦ A 6 4 2
♣ Q 8 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♦ |
Pass |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
3 ♣ |
Pass |
| 3 ♦ |
Pass |
3 ♥ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
May 22nd, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
Lucky to touch it, a shilling a day!
Rudyard Kipling
| S |
North |
| E-W |
♠ K J 9 8 3
♥ A 5
♦ 3 2
♣ 8 5 3 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ A 4
♥ K Q 10 9
♦ J 10 8 4
♣ A Q 9 |
♠ 2
♥ J 8 7 4 3 2
♦ 7 6 5
♣ J 10 7 |
| South |
♠ Q 10 7 6 5
♥ 6
♦ A K Q 9
♣ K 6 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♠ |
Dbl. |
3 NT* |
Pass |
| 4 ♠ |
All pass |
|
|
*Better than a preemptive raise to four spades
♥K
I have a secret hankering to bid three spades as a fit-jump (promising five decent spades and club support) but this is not a standard agreement so I must find a different approach. Here a simple call of two spades should be natural (and indeed some play it as forcing). I’d expect four spades to be the easiest game to make here if I can find any sort of spade fit; the club support can wait. So two spades it is.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K J 9 8 3
♥ A 5
♦ 3 2
♣ 8 5 3 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♥ |
2 ♣ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
May 21st, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 14 Comments
Art is the elimination of the unnecessary.
Pablo Picasso
| S |
North |
| E-W |
♠ 10 7 4 2
♥ A K 6 4
♦ A 5
♣ 9 6 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ 6
♥ J 10 8 2
♦ 10 6 4 3
♣ 10 8 7 5 |
♠ Q J 9
♥ Q 9 3
♦ K 8 7 2
♣ J 4 3 |
| South |
♠ A K 8 5 3
♥ 7 5
♦ Q J 9
♣ A K Q |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
2 NT* |
Pass |
| 3 ♠ |
Pass |
4 ♠ |
Pass |
| 6 ♠ |
All pass |
|
|
*Game-forcing spade raise
♥J
There are two bids I could not stomach making here. The first is passing; in third seat this is a full opener and passing makes your opponents’ life far too easy. The second is opening one club – anyone who does that deserves to find their partner raising clubs, or leading a club against the opponents’ final contract. Open one heart for the lead; if necessary put down dummy with a spade in your hearts…
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 10 7 4 2
♥ A K 6 4
♦ A 5
♣ 9 6 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
Pass |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
May 20th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 9 Comments
I love my fellow creatures – I do all the good I can – Yet everybody says I’m such a disagreeable man! And I can’t think why!
W. S. Gilbert
| S |
North |
| E-W |
♠ A 9 4
♥ Q 10 6 5
♦ A 4
♣ 9 8 7 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q 7 2
♥ J 3 2
♦ J 9 7 3
♣ A Q 3 |
♠ K 10 8 5
♥ 9 8 4
♦ 10 5
♣ K 10 5 2 |
| South |
♠ J 6 3
♥ A K 7
♦ K Q 8 6 2
♣ J 6 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
2 ♣ |
Pass |
| 2 ♦ |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♦3
This hand is far too good to pass two clubs — you might miss a cold game or even a slam. A simple invitational raise to three clubs should suffice. You may belong in three no-trump, but it will be up to partner to move toward game if he has extra values.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A 9 4
♥ Q 10 6 5
♦ A 4
♣ 9 8 7 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♦ |
Pass |
| 1 ♥ |
Pass |
2 ♣ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
May 19th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 10 Comments
In our plain defects, We already know the brotherhood of man.
Christopher Fry
| W |
North |
| Both |
♠ Q 8 6
♥ A 7 5
♦ A Q 5
♣ 9 7 4 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ 2
♥ J 9 8 3 2
♦ 8 6 2
♣ K Q J 6 |
♠ J 10 9 4
♥ 6
♦ J 9 7 3
♣ 10 8 5 3 |
| South |
♠ A K 7 5 3
♥ K Q 10 4
♦ K 10 4
♣ A |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
1 ♣ |
Pass |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
1 NT |
Pass |
| 3 ♥ |
Pass |
3 ♠ |
Pass |
| 4 NT |
Pass |
5 ♠* |
Pass |
| 6 ♠ |
All pass |
queen |
|
*Two key cards plus the trump
♣K
It is tempting to raise to three clubs, but my guess would be that I don’t have quite enough to invite game. A fifth club would make the raise far more attractive, or perhaps as little as an extra queen on the side. As it is, pass, and apologize if you have missed game.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 2
♥ J 9 8 3 2
♦ 8 6 2
♣ K Q J 6 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♠ |
Pass |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
2 ♣ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
May 18th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
‘Danger!’ said the old cob. ‘Danger! I welcome danger and adventure. Danger is my middle name.’
E. B. White
| N |
North |
| None |
♠ Q 8 6
♥ Q J 2
♦ A J 8 6
♣ K J 9 |
| West |
East |
♠ J 9 5
♥ K 7 3
♦ Q 2
♣ A 10 8 6 5 |
♠ 10 4 3 2
♥ 10 8 5 4
♦ 7 5 4
♣ Q 3 |
| South |
♠ A K 7
♥ A 9 6
♦ K 10 9 3
♣ 7 4 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♦ |
Pass |
| 3 NT |
All pass |
|
|
♣6
With your heart suit an unattractive one to lead from, the choice is whether to lead trumps or play for club ruffs. The opponents are known to be in a 5-3 or 4-4 fit (since partner’s double guarantees at least three spades), so leading a trump might mangle partner’s holding. And the possibility of club ruffs looks as good as any way to set up tricks for your side, so I would lead the club jack.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ 10 3
♥ A 10 8 6 5
♦ J 10 6 4
♣ J 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♦ |
Dbl. |
1 ♠ |
| 2 ♥ |
2 ♠ |
3 ♥ |
3 ♠ |
| All pass |
|
|
|
May 17th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 7 Comments
|
Last week at our club a question arose regarding an Alert. In a Flannery sequence does a response of two hearts or two spades require an Alert, on the grounds that those responses indicate no game interest? Many of our newer or non-Flannery players would be shut out of the auction, because of the lack of an Alert.
Level Pegging, Bellevue, Wash.
I believe no Alert is required. The bids are a natural suggestion of a place to play. In a bridge club you’d assume that either the opponents will know this, or be able to work it out. I’m no great fan of using conventions to bamboozle opponents, but we can’t spoon-feed everyone – just in case they aren’t paying attention. By contrast, a jump to three hearts or three spades, if weak, should be Alerted, since the alternative interpretation of forcing or invitational could easily be assumed here.
Recently one of my opponents mentioned Goldwater’s Rule after a bid out of turn. I didn’t understand the explanation – could you clarify it for me please.
Term Limits, Eau Claire, Wis.
Tournament Director Harry Goldwater produced a rule but it was for a lead out of turn not an insufficient call. He suggested that when a lead is made out of turn, you should accept it, on the grounds that anyone who cannot work out who is on lead, probably won’t know what to lead either.
Can you comment on the rebid problem here? I held:
♠ Q, ♥ K-9-7, ♦ K-Q-8-7-4, ♣ A-J-9-3. I opened one diamond and chose to rebid two clubs over my partner’s one spade response. When my partner raised to three clubs, would you pass or explore for game – or even up and bid three no-trump? My partner had stretched with an eight-count and five clubs, so no game was good.
Third Time Lucky, Durango, Colo.
Your soft cards strongly suggest five clubs is not going to make, so the question is how much you need to go looking for no-trump. I would feel far happier with the diamond 10 instead of the four. As it is I would pass reluctantly, expecting neither of our side-suits would set up easily, even if we overcame a weakness in hearts.
|
I read your column daily in Spokane’s Spokesman Review. In a column around two years ago, you responded to a reader’s request for recommendation for a book for beginners. You recommended two books as I recall. I cut out the article, planned to order at least one of the books, but lost the page I had cut out. I would like to read up on a little bit before I join a bridge group of some kind — hopefully at my skill level.
Johnny on the Spot, Spokane, Wash.
Here are some suggestions: Planning the Play of a Bridge Hand, by Barbara Seagram & David Bird, or Bridge for Dummies by Eddie Kantar. And the Audrey Grant series for ACBL are all excellent.
I was dealt ♠ J-9, ♥ Q-7-3-2, ♦ A-10-8-6-4, ♣ K-7 and heard my LHO open one heart, over which my partner overcalled one spade. Now came two clubs on my right. Was I supposed to bid at all – and if so what would you recommend? I chose to raise spades treating my doubleton as the equivalent of three small trumps. Was this reasonable?
Advance with Care, Albuquerque, N.M.
In this seat some play fourth-suit doubles here (also called snapdragon or competitive doubles). This would show good but not great diamonds, together with spade tolerance, and values. The same principle would apply if your RHO had raised hearts as opposed to bidding a new suit. Double would be take-out and value-showing.
|
May 16th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 2 Comments
The blazing evidence of immortality is our dissatisfaction with any other solution.
Ralph Waldo Emerson
| North |
North |
| North-South |
♠ K Q 9
♥ A K
♦ Q J 7 6
♣ A Q J 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ 8 7 4 3 2
♥ 6 2
♦ K 10 9 8 5 4
♣ — |
♠ A J 10 6 5
♥ J 4
♦ A
♣ K 10 7 6 3 |
| South |
♠ —
♥ Q 10 9 8 7 5 3
♦ 3 2
♣ 9 8 5 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
2 ♣ |
2 ♦ * |
| Pass |
3 ♣ |
Dbl. |
5 ♣ |
| 5 ♥ |
All pass |
|
|
* Hearts or the black suits
♠8
These days Leaping Michaels is a popular treatment after your opponents open with a weak two bid. Here a jump to four clubs would show clubs and a major – which would seem ideal. However you need a better hand than this to take the action. A simple call of two spades (hoping to get another chance) is the most sensible course of action.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A J 10 6 5
♥ J 4
♦ A
♣ K 10 7 6 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
2 ♦ |
| ? |
|
|
|
|
All this week’s deals come from recent trials for the US National open team, since the trials are currently being held this week in Schaumburg, Illinois.
Against four hearts, Eric Greco, West, started off with ace and a second club, giving the defense the first two tricks, and signaling for the lower suit in the process. Now Geoff Hampson, East, knew that his partner had the diamond ace. It would have been right to play diamonds if he had a potential trump trick himself, but he knew that he did not, so he played the spade jack, correctly won by declarer’s ace.
South then made the mistake of drawing two rounds of trump, using high hearts from hand. Now when he led a diamond towards dummy, Greco covered the 10 with the jack (allowing declarer to win one, but not two diamond tricks). At this point when declarer surrendered a spade, Hampson could return a trump, killing dummy’s ruff. There was no way to come home now — although declarer could have succeeded by taking only one trump and then playing on diamonds, when he can arrange the spade ruff.
In the other room the club ace was led and a second club ruffed, again with West giving a diamond suit-preference signal. On East’s instinctive diamond return, West won the ace to lead a third club, but there was no trump promotion when declarer ruffed with the heart jack. Since two top diamonds could take care of the spade losers, the contract succeeded.