May 15th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 20 Comments
The Mind of Man My haunt, and the main region of my song.
William Wordsworth
| East |
North |
| Both |
♠ J 9 8 ♥ A 7 ♦ A K 10 3 ♣ 10 7 6 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ 7 4 3 ♥ J 9 8 5 4 2 ♦ 6 2 ♣ K 3 |
♠ — ♥ 10 6 ♦ Q 8 5 4 ♣ A Q J 9 8 5 2 |
| South |
♠ A K Q 10 6 5 2 ♥ K Q 3 ♦ J 9 7 ♣ — |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
3 ♣ |
| 4 ♠ |
Pass |
5 ♦ |
Pass |
| 6 ♣ |
Pass |
6 ♦ |
Pass |
| 7 ♠ |
All pass |
|
|
♥5
The underlying message from this auction will not be agreed by everyone, but I believe that at this point in the auction one should not try to improve the partscore. With a bad hand, one passes three clubs and hopes for the best. A call of three hearts here is natural suggesting extra hearts and not a complete bust, and seems the right call now.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 7 4 3 ♥ J 9 8 5 4 2 ♦ 6 2 ♣ K 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♠ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| 2 ♥ |
Pass |
3 ♣ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
May 14th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 14 Comments
One has not only an ability to perceive the world but an ability to alter one’s perception of it; more simply, one can change things by the manner in which one looks at them.
Tom Robbins
| South |
North |
| Neither |
♠ J 5
♥ J 9 4
♦ Q 4 3
♣ A Q 7 5 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ 10 7 3
♥ Q 6 2
♦ A 9 8
♣ 10 8 4 2 |
♠ A 9 8 4
♥ A 8 5 3
♦ 10 5 2
♣ J 6 |
| South |
♠ K Q 6 2
♥ K 10 7
♦ K J 7 6
♣ K 9 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♣2
While you have a maximum for your initial call, you have no clear way forward, and it seems like a breach of the law of total tricks to advance to the three-level with only three-card support. A three-club call here would suggest six, and a hand suited to offense than this, but it may be the least lie. Double would be penalty here, by the way, and pass could easily work out here.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ J 5
♥ J 9 4
♦ Q 4 3
♣ A Q 7 5 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♥ |
Pass |
| 2 ♥ |
Pass |
Pass |
2 ♠ |
| ? |
|
|
|
May 13th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 15 Comments
Better the day, better the deed.
Thomas Middleton
| South |
North |
| North-South |
♠ A K 10
♥ A 10 3
♦ A 6 4 3
♣ K J 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ 5 2
♥ Q 9 8 6 2
♦ Q 10 9 8
♣ 8 4 |
♠ J 8 3
♥ J
♦ K J 7 5
♣ 10 9 7 6 5 |
| South |
♠ Q 9 7 6 4
♥ K 7 5 4
♦ 2
♣ A Q 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
2 ♣ |
Pass |
| 2 ♥ |
Pass |
3 ♦ |
Pass |
| 4 ♣ |
Pass |
4 ♦ |
Pass |
| 5 ♣ |
Pass |
6 ♠ |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♣8
It is very tempting to raise partner; after all one is always told to support with support. Here I’m dubious as to whether this is right, as your whole hand is defense to diamonds, and your partner may picture a more offensively oriented hand than this. Nonetheless I will raise, with misgivings. With the spade 10 instead of the jack, I pass.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ J 8 3
♥ J
♦ K J 7 5
♣ 10 9 7 6 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| Pass |
Pass |
1 ♠ |
2 ♦ |
| ? |
|
|
|
May 12th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
It’s sometimes funny to watch some people doing something the wrong way but doing it confidently. Even more funny, they succeeded.
Toby Beta
| South |
North |
| Both |
♠ 4 3
♥ K J 9 8 4
♦ 3
♣ A J 8 6 5 |
| West |
East |
♠ J
♥ 5 3 2
♦ K 8 7 5 4
♣ K 7 3 2 |
♠ A K 8
♥ Q 10 6
♦ Q 10 9 6 2
♣ 10 9 |
| South |
♠ Q 10 9 7 6 5 2
♥ A 7
♦ A J
♣ Q 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
1 NT |
Pass |
| 3 ♠ |
Pass |
4 ♠ |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♦5
My best guess would be to bid four hearts – which is what you were surely intending to bid had East passed. Once in a while hands like this produce lots of tricks on offense, but declarer can run the diamond suit in one no-trump doubled. So I would be reluctant to try to defend here. And if East is playing silly games, let him try and sort that out at the five-level on the next round.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 4 3
♥ K J 9 8 4
♦ 3
♣ A J 8 6 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♦ |
Dbl. |
1 NT |
| ? |
|
|
|
May 11th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
The remedy is worse than the disease.
Francs Bacon
| South |
North |
| East-West |
♠ A Q 5
♥ J 9 5
♦ 5 2
♣ K Q 10 7 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ 8 4 3
♥ K 8 4
♦ K Q J 10 3
♣ 9 2 |
♠ 7 2
♥ Q 10 7 2
♦ 9 8 7 4
♣ A 5 3 |
| South |
♠ K J 10 9 6
♥ A 6 3
♦ A 6
♣ J 8 6 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
2 ♣ |
Pass |
| 2 ♠ |
Pass |
4 ♠ |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♦K
Although there are unlikely scenarios in which a top diamond could be right, if declarer is threatening to build the hearts or spades for a discard, I suspect a diamond will cost more often than it would gain. Put me down for a mundane small heart lead – and not the heart seven or nine under any circumstances.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 10 3 2
♥ 9 7 4
♦ K Q 10 3
♣ 8 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
3 ♥ |
5 ♣ |
| All pass |
|
|
|
May 10th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 10 Comments
|
In third chair I held: ♠ Q-10-5-3, ♥ J-7-5, ♦ K-5, ♣ K-J-7-3, and heard my partner open one heart. Can you comment on the merits of the direct raise, a response of one spade, or starting out with a response of one no-trump.
Mixing it up, Memphis, Tenn.
If you use the direct raise to two hearts as constructive, with a one no-trump response as forcing, I’d raise directly. Try not to jump raise (either immediately or at the second turn) with a mundane 10-count – which this surely is. I would not respond one spade unless I planned to jump to three hearts facing my partner’s response. And I’d try to have good spades for that auction if I did.
Is Drury the answer to all problems when facing a potentially light third-in-hand opener? Is there not the risk of losing the club suit as a passed hand?
Gumboots, Rockford, Ill.
Drury (the passed hand response of two clubs to a majorsuit opening showing a maximum pass, and a fit) has many plusses. It keeps you low on occasions, and lets you explore the right game efficiently. You minimize the risk you describe if you stretch to open one club with 11 points and six clubs in first or second chair. With fewer points, pass, then respond one no-trump (or three clubs if necessary).
My partner and I disagreed over a recent hand. I had: ♠ A-J-5-2, ♥ 10-8-7-5-4, ♦ Q-2, ♣ J-4, when you hear your partner open one no-trump? I chose to use Stayman and pass the response of two spades, judging that I had improved the contract already. Nine tricks were the limit on the hand, but my partner said I owed him a bid. Any thoughts?
Head Cook, West Palm Beach, Fla.
I would use Stayman as you did, planning to bid two no-trump over a two diamond response. But I would have raised two spades to three, and would have raised a two heart response to game – so I feel you did not do enough, irrespective of the result actually achieved on this hand.
|
I play the rule of 15 to decide whether to open a fourth hand (adding my HCP points to the number of spades I hold.) A person I respect says I should have 16 pts. How many points do your recommend?
Pearson Pointer, Vancouver, British Columbia
Don’t be guided by that rule alone. With 13 or more HCP open, and don’t worry about such issues. With 11-12, look at your controls and ease of rebid. Consider the vulnerability (always open unfavorable, since neither opponent bid when they had the chance, and partner might pass 11-12 hands in 2nd). At favorable be more discreet – partner didn’t open when he might have done! Certainly use 15 not 16 as the guideline. You paid your entry fee; bid when you can.
When considering whether to open two no-trump, should you be put off by holding a weak doubleton? I assume a five-card major is not a serious drawback, but what about a five-card minor AND a four-card major? I recently held: ♠ A-Q-7-3, ♥ 9-5, ♦ A-Q-J-7-5, ♣ A-K, and elected to open one diamond. My partner disagreed with my perception of the hand’s flaws for an opening of two notrump. What do you think?
Lincoln Lawyer, Riverside, Calif.
I agree with you that opening two no-trump unnecessarily preempts yourself when you have an easy and far more descriptive route available, namely to open one diamond and then to jump or reverse into spades. Sometimes one settles for a two no-trump opening when all the alternatives are more seriously flawed, but not today.
|
May 9th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 12 Comments
Tugging all day at perverse life: The indignity of it!
Theodore Roethke
| South |
North |
| Both |
♠ A 7 6 3
♥ 6
♦ A Q J 5 3 2
♣ J 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ 5
♥ A Q J 10 2
♦ 10 9 7
♣ 10 9 7 2 |
♠ K 9 4 2
♥ K 8 7 4 3
♦ 8 4
♣ A Q |
| South |
♠ Q J 10 8
♥ 9 5
♦ K 6
♣ K 8 6 5 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| Pass |
Pass |
1 ♦ |
1 ♥ |
| 1 ♠ * |
4 ♥ |
4 ♠ |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
* Four+ spades
♥A
Assuming you play the forcing no-trump in response to an opening bid, is there ever a hand where you would be tempted to pass the response? Yes, and this is it, since your option would be to bid two clubs on a doubleton or to rebid those feeble hearts and promise six in the process. So does your partner have a sense of humor? Now might be the moment to find out…
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K 9 4 2
♥ K 8 7 4 3
♦ 8 4
♣ A Q |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♥ |
Pass |
1 NT |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
May 8th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 10 Comments
Income tax returns are the most imaginative fiction being written today.
Herman Wouk
| South |
North |
| East-West |
♠ A K Q 10 2
♥ A Q
♦ 5 2
♣ Q 10 5 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ 8 6
♥ J 8 7
♦ Q 10 6 3
♣ K 8 6 4 |
♠ J 9 5 3
♥ 9 6 5 2
♦ J 4
♣ J 9 2 |
| South |
♠ 7 4
♥ K 10 4 3
♦ A K 9 8 7
♣ A 7 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♦ |
Pass |
2 ♠ |
Pass |
| 2 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
Pass |
| 6 NT |
All pass |
|
|
♠8
The choice here is a call of two clubs or a bid of two no-trump. The latter gets across the invitational nature of the hand, while not the skewed honor structure and the side four-card suit. The two club call may lead to a missed game facing a hand with no fit but 8-9 HCP say. Overall, though, if your partner does not pass the two club bid it lets you follow up to show the extras and leaves you far better placed.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A K Q 10 2
♥ A Q
♦ 5 2
♣ Q 10 5 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
1 NT |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
May 7th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 19 Comments
Be calm in arguing; for fierceness makes Error a fault and truth a discourtesy.
George Herbert
| South |
North |
| East-West |
♠ 5 3
♥ 7 5 4
♦ 9 4
♣ K J 10 8 7 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q 10 8 7 4
♥ 9 8
♦ Q 10 5
♣ A 6 5 |
♠ J 9 6 2
♥ K 10 6 2
♦ J 8 6 2
♣ 4 |
| South |
♠ A K
♥ A Q J 3
♦ A K 7 3
♣ Q 9 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 2 ♣ |
Pass |
2 ♦ |
Pass |
| 2 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♠7
With such a choice of four-card suits to bid, is there a right answer? (Anyone who bid one no-trump will be sent to bed without supper.) Yes, respond one heart here, hoping to find a major-suit fit if there is one. If you bid one diamond, your partner may bypass his own four-card major, expecting you to have bid a major with a hand of less than invitational values.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 9 6 2
♥ K 10 6 2
♦ J 8 6 2
♣ 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
1 ♣ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
May 6th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 11 Comments
The road to success is dotted with many tempting parking spaces.
Will Rogers
| North |
North |
| East-West |
♠ Q J 7
♥ 8 6
♦ A Q 7
♣ A 9 6 4 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ 2
♥ Q 9 7
♦ J 10 9 8 4 3
♣ K J 3 |
♠ 10 9 8 3
♥ J 10 5 4 3
♦ 5 2
♣ Q 7 |
| South |
♠ A K 6 5 4
♥ A K 2
♦ K 6
♣ 10 8 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♣ |
Pass |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
2 ♠ |
Pass |
| 3 ♥ |
Pass |
4 ♠ |
Pass |
| 4 NT |
Pass |
5 ♠ |
Pass |
| 6 ♠ |
All pass |
|
|
♦J
You have no reason to be ashamed of this hand – yet. If you do not compete to two diamonds, you may miss out on a partscore. By bidding, you help to push your opponents higher, though the risk that your partner may play you for a slightly better hand – or suit – is not negligible. Still, bidding is more fun than passing, isn’t it?
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 2
♥ Q 9 7
♦ J 10 9 8 4 3
♣ K J 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♣ |
1 ♠ |
2 ♣ |
| ? |
|
|
|
|
Neither North nor South held back on this deal. North’s five diamond call was a cuebid in support of spades, and a further exchange of cuebids saw North at his next turn guarantee first round heart control when he bid six diamonds, since he was looking for a grand slam when South had denied the heart ace. Now South decided the grand slam was unlikely to be worse than a diamond finesse.
West led the heart five against seven spades, and declarer saw that there was no rush to take the diamond finesse. After winning the heart lead in hand, then entering dummy with a top trump, declarer ruffed a club in hand. Now he repeated the process, then cashed the remaining hearts and ran all but one of his trumps. When East turned up with only two cards in the majors, the prospects of a diamond finesse succeeding were poor, but look what happened to East when declarer discarded dummy’s small diamonds on the trumps.
In the four-card ending South had reduced to one trump and three diamonds, while dummy had two clubs and the diamond ace-king. That left East struggling for a discard from his three diamonds to the queen and the club ace-queen. If he threw a club, dummy’s ten could be established with a ruff; when he parted with a diamond, declarer cashed both of dummy’s diamonds. Now South’s diamond jack became a winner, while he still had a trump in hand to reach it.