March 10th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
If you care enough for a result, you will most certainly attain it.
William James
| South |
North |
| East-West |
♠ 8 5
♥ A 6
♦ A Q 7 5 4
♣ 8 6 4 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ J 10 9 3
♥ J 8
♦ K 10 8 6
♣ Q J 9 |
♠ Q 7 6 4 2
♥ Q 10 9 2
♦ 2
♣ K 10 2 |
| South |
♠ A K
♥ K 7 5 4 3
♦ J 9 3
♣ A 7 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
♠J
You have more than enough to bid on here, given your double fit plus the knowledge of partner being really short in spades. But bidding four hearts would be lazy; you must bid four clubs to keep partner in the picture and to help him judge the five- or six-level. Would it amaze you if you were cold for slam in either clubs or hearts? It certainly wouldn't surprise me!
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 7 6 4 2
♥ Q 10 9 2
♦ 2
♣ K 10 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1♥ |
Pass |
| 2♥ |
2♠ |
3♣ |
3♠ |
| ? |
|
|
|
March 9th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 19 Comments
Misery still delights to trace Its semblance in another’s case.
William Cowper
| South |
North |
| Neither |
♠ A J 10 7 4
♥ A 9 5
♦ 4 2
♣ Q 6 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ 3
♥ Q 8 7 6 2
♦ K 8 3
♣ J 10 7 2 |
♠ 5
♥ K J 10 3
♦ J 9 7 6
♣ K 9 8 3 |
| South |
♠ K Q 9 8 6 2
♥ 4
♦ A Q 10 5
♣ A 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♠ |
Pass |
2 NT |
Pass |
| 3♥ |
Pass |
3♠ |
Pass |
| 4 NT |
Pass |
5♥ |
Pass |
| 5 NT |
Pass |
6♠ |
All pass |
♥6
I don't particularly like the trump lead here (dummy rates to be very short and we might be pickling partner's vulnerable honor. So though I am not a fan of leading doubletons in declarer's suit, I will start off with the diamond eight, knowing that the auction has suggested to my partner that declarer won't be overloaded in diamonds, and thus he may work out not to give me a ruff.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ A 10 6 5
♥ 9 6 4
♦ 8 5
♣ A Q 4 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| Pass |
1♦ |
Pass |
1♥ |
| Pass |
2♣ |
Pass |
2♥ |
| All pass |
|
|
|
March 8th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 7 Comments
|
When you open one no-trump and partner responds with Stayman, how do you deal with intervention? Can you ever bid at the three-level?
Coping Mechanism, Texarkana, Texas
If the opponents double, the simple option is to redouble to show very good clubs, while two diamonds shows real diamonds, and pass is the default call with nothing to say. A more sophisticated approach is to pass without a stopper and use any action to show a stopper. Over higher intervention, bid at the two-level if you can, with double penalties. Bids at the three-level show a five-card major and a maximum.
I got criticized for opening the following hand: ♠ A-Q-3-2, ♥ Q-J-3, ♦ 10, ♣ Q-9-4-3-2. Where do you stand on this, and would your position change depending on position or vulnerability?
Light Brigade, Bremerton, Wash.
5-4 hand patterns with easy rebids are tempting to open. I'd be much happier with a little more in my long suit or chunkier intermediates; but non-vulnerable I don't need much convincing to get in there. This is especially so in first or third seat.
I picked up: ♠ 10-7-4, ♥ Q-10-8-5, ♦ A-Q-9-5, ♣ A-Q and opened one diamond in second seat. My LHO overcalled one spade, partner made a negative double, and my RHO raised to two spades. Should I bid three hearts now or pass?
Lone Granger, Fresno, Calif.
I think your weak spade length is favorable for action. Bidding three hearts is certainly reasonable here, but there is a conventional gadget that might allow you to distinguish between a real invitation and a purely competitive action. Details of how to use a call of two no-trump as artificial (the so-called good-bad two no-trump) can be found here.
|
In fourth seat, not vulnerable, I held ♠ J-10-9-7-6-5, ♥ J-5-3, ♦ A-4, ♣ 6-4. My LHO, vulnerable, opened with one spade, which my partner doubled. My RHO passed, and after some thought so did I. We set the contract two tricks, for 500 points. My partner insists I should have bid one no trump, allowing him to bid at the two-level. My argument is that even plus 110 or 140 versus the 200 that I considered probable was a poor return.
Hair Gel, Albuquerque, N.M.
I like your reasoning – it is the 9-7 of trumps that persuade me! If your partner cannot be convinced by the result that you achieved at the table, he is indeed a hard nut to crack.
In yesterday's Casper Wyoming Tribune, the partner used Blackwood, but opener's response was five spades with only one ace. Why wasn't the response five diamonds?
Goodnight Irene, Casper, Wyo.
My apologies for losing the footnote that should have gone with the Roman Keycard Blackwood response. Bridge Guys’ definition sets out how this version of Blackwood allows you to find out about the trump king and queen. This is by no means an essential part of modern bidding but honesty compels me to admit that more and more players do use a gadget of this sort when asking for aces.
|
March 7th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 2 Comments
His imagination resembled the wings of an ostrich. It enabled him to run, though not to soar.
Lord Macaulay
| North |
North |
| Both |
♠ 10 8 6 2
♥ A Q J 7 6
♦ Q J 10
♣ A |
| West |
East |
♠ 3
♥ 10 9 5
♦ K 7 6 3
♣ Q J 10 9 4 |
♠ Q 9 7 5
♥ 8 3
♦ 8 4 2
♣ K 8 5 3 |
| South |
♠ A K J 4
♥ K 4 2
♦ A 9 5
♣ 7 6 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1♥ |
Pass |
| 1♠ |
Pass |
3♠ |
Pass |
| 4 NT |
Pass |
5♥* |
Pass |
| 6♠ |
All pass |
|
|
*Two keycards and no trump queen
♣Q
It bears repeating that the flipside of playing negative doubles is that you are compelled to re-open in these sequences with shortage in the opponents’ suit. Here you have the perfect shape to double, and anything your partner does will be fine by you (though you are of course hoping for a penalty pass from your partner).
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 10 8 6 2
♥ A Q J 7 6
♦ Q J 10
♣ A |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♥ |
2♣ |
Pass |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
March 6th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 2 Comments
Nothing encourages creativity like the chance to fall flat on one's face.
James D. Finley
| South |
North |
| East-West |
♠ 10 7 6 4
♥ 8 5 3
♦ 8 7 3
♣ 10 7 5 |
| West |
East |
♠ J 8 3 2
♥ 10 9 6 2
♦ Q 10 5 2
♣ Q |
♠ A Q 9 5
♥ J 7 4
♦ J 9
♣ J 8 6 4 |
| South |
♠ K
♥ A K Q
♦ A K 6 4
♣ A K 9 3 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 2♣ |
Pass |
2♦ |
Pass |
| 3♣ |
Pass |
3♦* |
Pass |
| 3 NT |
All pass |
|
|
*Second negative
♥10
The value call here is to bid three spades, showing a preemptive not a limit raise. If the vulnerability discourages you from that action then you might bid just two spades. Incidentally, with limit raise values you should either double one no-trump or bid two no-trumps, which is an artificial call, guaranteeing support. You cannot want to invite in no-trump – you would surely double them instead.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ J 8 3 2
♥ 9 8 6 2
♦ Q 10 5 2
♣ Q |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
Pass |
1♠ |
1 NT |
| ? |
|
|
|
March 5th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 9 Comments
The most dangerous of our calculations are those we call illusions.
George Bernanos
| South |
North |
| East-West |
♠ Q 9 4
♥ Q 10 6 2
♦ A Q 2
♣ J 5 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ K 10
♥ 8 7 4
♦ J 10
♣ K Q 9 8 6 2 |
♠ J 6 5
♥ A J 9 5
♦ 9 7 6 5 3
♣ 4 |
| South |
♠ A 8 7 3 2
♥ K 3
♦ K 8 4
♣ A 10 7 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♠ |
2♣ |
3♣ |
Pass |
| 4♠ |
All pass |
|
|
♣K
Your inclination might be to let sleeping dogs lie, and pass out one diamond. That might work out well for you, but the percentage action is surely to balance with a call of one no-trump, showing a maximum pass with a diamond stop. Unless your LHO has a moose, this rates to play well enough for your side.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 9 4
♥ Q 10 6 2
♦ A Q 2
♣ J 5 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| Pass |
1♦ |
Pass |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
March 4th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 14 Comments
In small proportions we just beauties see; And in short measures life may perfect be.
Ben Jonson
| South |
North |
| Neither |
♠ J 9 8
♥ J 6 5 4
♦ A J 8 7
♣ 8 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ 5 3 2
♥ 10 7
♦ 6 4 2
♣ J 10 9 4 2 |
♠ 6 4
♥ A K Q 3 2
♦ Q 10 9
♣ K Q 6 |
| South |
♠ A K Q 10 7
♥ 9 8
♦ K 5 3
♣ A 7 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♠ |
Pass |
2♠ |
Dbl. |
| 4♠ |
All pass |
|
|
♣J
My views here may seem somewhat sacrilegious amongst the 'Majors first at all costs' but I would raise to two diamonds rather than bid one heart. The former preempts a level of the auction, and tells partner where you live. Bear in mind that in third seat partner with limited values will tend to bid suits he wants led. So you shouldn't worry about facing three small diamonds here.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ J 9 8
♥ J 6 5 4
♦ A J 8 7
♣ 8 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| Pass |
Pass |
1♦ |
Dbl. |
| ? |
|
|
|
March 3rd, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 13 Comments
There is nothing to winning, really. That is, if you happen to be blessed with a keen eye, an agile mind, and no scruples whatsoever.
Alfred Hitchcock
| South |
North |
| Neither |
♠ K J 6
♥ J 5
♦ K 8 3
♣ A 9 6 5 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q 5 4
♥ A 9 8 7 4
♦ Q J 7
♣ J 2 |
♠ 7
♥ K Q 10 3 2
♦ 9 6 4 2
♣ Q 8 3 |
| South |
♠ A 10 9 8 3 2
♥ 6
♦ A 10 5
♣ K 10 7 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♠ |
Pass |
2♣ |
Pass |
| 2♠ |
Pass |
4♠ |
All pass |
♦Q
Since you have already denied four spades at your last turn, it feels right to raise three spade to four spades. Even if you are playing a 4-3 fit, this will surely be the game with the best chances for your side.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K J 6
♥ J 5
♦ K 8 3
♣ A 9 6 5 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
1♥ |
| Dbl. |
Pass |
2♥ |
Pass |
| 3♣ |
Pass |
3♠ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
March 2nd, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 10 Comments
People say that life is the thing, but I prefer reading.
Logan Pearsall Smith
| South |
North |
| East-West |
♠ Q 6 4
♥ Q 10
♦ A 3 2
♣ K J 7 5 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ A J 9
♥ J 6 4 3
♦ Q 10 6
♣ Q 10 8 |
♠ K 7 5 3
♥ K 7 5 2
♦ 8 5
♣ 9 6 2 |
| South |
♠ 10 8 2
♥ A 9 8
♦ K J 9 7 4
♣ A 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♦ |
Pass |
2♣ |
Pass |
| 2 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
♥3
Dummy rates to be pretty strong, since West doesn't seem to have that many hearts. Since your partner didn't overcall, you could make a good case for underleading the club ace to the first trick. Much depends on your partner's ability to take a joke, though. If he is the sort of person who has never underled an ace and doesn't expect you to do that, maybe lead a low spade or start with the club ace.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ J 5 4
♥ K 8 3
♦ 9 6 5
♣ A 9 6 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| Pass |
1♦ |
Pass |
3♥ |
| Pass |
4♥ |
All pass |
|
March 1st, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 10 Comments
|
I opened one heart in first seat with: ♠ A-Q-9-7, ♥ A-Q-8-6-5, ♦ 10-5, ♣ K-3 and heard my partner raised to two hearts and RHO now joined in with three clubs. How would you rate my options of pass, double, three diamonds, and three hearts?
Big Game Hunter, Richmond, Va.
Passing is unduly pessimistic while double should be strong and extra values, not quite what you have. Your real extra distribution makes bidding three hearts as a purely competitive maneuver logical enough, but slightly pessimistic. Meanwhile a call of three diamonds is an unspecified game-try (one does not have space to make the call about diamonds). I'd settle for that action.
My partner and I want to establish a firm agreement about what is the significance of discarding an honor at your first opportunity. Equally, when you follow with an honor under a high-card lead from your partner, or an honor from dummy, what should that mean?
Fever Pitch, Newark, N.J.
If you drop an honor on partner's high-card lead, it suggests either at most a doubleton, or a suit solid down from that card, denying a higher honor. Similarly discarding a queen would suggest the jack and maybe the 10, but no king. Warning: very occasionally playing an unnatural honor might be suit-preference, or a wake-up call to find an unusual play.
Holding ♠ A-7-3-2, ♥ A-5-3, ♦ Q-9-5, ♣ A-4-2, I opened one club and heard my partner respond one heart. What is my best rebid now, one spade, one no-trump or two hearts?
No Second Chance, New Orleans, La.
I prefer a rebid of one no-trump – I might even try two hearts, though that would be very rare on a 4-3-3-3 pattern. I'd be unhappy to make a call of one spade, which to my mind guarantees shows at least four clubs. If you buy in to the idea that rebidding one spade then raising hearts would show a 4-3-1-5 pattern and a non-minimum, you have to go some way other than bidding one spade at your second turn. Otherwise you never get to show delayed heart support without promising extras.
|
Yesterday I played in a rubber group for the first time, and opened one no-trump on 17 points with a doubleton heart ace. My partner responded three hearts and when I played safe and raised to game we made six. Although they play transfers, she thought her bid showed a game force with six hearts. I thought it was better to make the strong hand declarer, and that the transfer would have given more room for the exchange of more information.
Chatty Kathy, Grenada, Miss.
One does not have to play conventions here but if playing transfers (and especially if playing Texas Transfers as well) then a two-level transfer and jump to game can be used for a mild slam try. Now we can get sophisticated and use the three-level bids for some of the awkward hands such as hands with both minors, or even 5-5 hands with both majors.
I have the feeling you like to get into auctions quickly, but would you make a take-out double after hearing one club to your left, and one spade to your right holding: ♠ Q-10-5, ♥ A-K-7-5, ♦ K-7-5, ♣ A-8-3?
Trouble City, Bellevue, Wash.
I consider action here mandatory. I think direct action safer than passing and then balancing. But I would refer to bid one no-trump showing a strong balanced hand, rather than double, despite my four-card holding in the other major. You should not play one no-trump as unusual, except by a passed hand – you have double and a call of two no-trump for the unbid suits.
|
|
There are enough inferior plays and cutting comments at the Dyspeptics Club to provide splendid entertainment – though a significant portion of the discussions might carry an R-rating.
In three no-trumps one might have expected South to make a play first, and start thinking about what he should have done later. Instead, declarer captured the spade lead in hand, and actually paused to consider what might go wrong. The only danger that he could envisage was a 4-1 diamond break, so he improved on the simple finesse by leading to the diamond ace. Had East held a significant singleton or West the diamond king, this line would have worked, but in fact the shortage of entries to dummy would have left declarer awkwardly placed against anything but a singleton king. And today with East having a small singleton, his line failed. When South complained about his bad luck he received the verbal equivalent of raspberry from his partner. Can you see why?
Leading the nine to the ace might have covered the situation where East had a singleton king, eight or 10, but it is possible to do even better. Best of all would have been to lead the diamond jack from hand at the second trick. If West covers with the king declarer can win the ace and lead to his nine to ensure four diamond tricks. This line works against any singleton in East bar a singleton king, and also against a singleton king or 10 in West.