April 30th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 2 Comments
My name is Ozymandias, king of kings: Look on my works ye mighty, and despair!
Percy Shelley
| South |
North |
| North-South |
♠ K J 9
♥ A 5 2
♦ 6 4 3 2
♣ 10 8 7 |
| West |
East |
♠ 6 3
♥ 9 6
♦ Q J 10 8 7
♣ K J 4 2 |
♠ 10 8 7 5 2
♥ J 10 7 4
♦ A 5
♣ 9 3 |
| South |
♠ A Q 4
♥ K Q 8 3
♦ K 9
♣ A Q 6 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 2 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
♦Q
If you play that you can use Stayman and then sign off in two spades over a two diamond response, you should do that. If that sequence would mean something else for you, your choice is to transfer into spades and risk missing a better heart contract or bid Stayman and follow up with two hearts, when you might play a 4-3 heart fit instead of a superior contract in spades. You pay your money…
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 10 8 7 5 2
♥ J 10 7 4
♦ A 5
♣ 9 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
1 NT |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
April 29th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Wednesday, April 15th, 2015
Thinking nothing done while anything remained to be done.
Lucan
| West |
North |
| East-West |
♠ 8 4 3
♥ K 3
♦ A 7 5 2
♣ 7 6 4 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ A K Q 10 2
♥ 7
♦ J 9 4
♣ Q J 10 8 |
♠ J 9 5
♥ J 9 4 2
♦ Q 10 8
♣ 9 5 3 |
| South |
♠ 7 6
♥ A Q 10 8 6 5
♦ K 6 3
♣ A K |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1♠ |
Pass |
Pass |
| 3♥ |
Pass |
4♥ |
All pass |
♠K
Do not be put off by your weak spades from raising to two spades here. Yes, there are lies of the cards where you might walk into a penalty – but one doesn’t avoid crossing the road because a car might jump a red light and hit you. You have the values and shape for a raise, so bid your hand and let the chips fall where they may.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 8 4 3
♥ K 3
♦ A 7 5 2
♣ 7 6 4 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1♠ |
1 NT |
| ? |
|
|
|
April 28th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
The liar’s punishment is, not in the least that he is not believed, but that he cannot believe anyone else.
George Bernard Shaw
| South |
North |
| Neither |
♠ 8 4 2
♥ K Q J
♦ K Q 10 9
♣ 8 5 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ A Q 10 6
♥ 9 7 6
♦ 4
♣ J 9 7 6 2 |
♠ 7 5 3
♥ 10 5 3
♦ 7 5 2
♣ A Q 10 4 |
| South |
♠ K J 9
♥ A 8 4 2
♦ A J 8 6 3
♣ K |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
♣6
A call of two hearts may look obvious here, and so it is. But in making that call, be aware that you are suggesting not only a four-card heart suit with equal or probably longer diamonds, but also you are guaranteeing a hand that wants to force to game. Had you held a weaker hand, you would almost certainly have started by responding one heart.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K J 9
♥ A 8 4 2
♦ A J 8 6 3
♣ K |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
1♣ |
Pass |
| 1♦ |
Pass |
1 NT |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
April 27th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 2 Comments
I only ask for information.
Charles Dickens
| West |
North |
| East-West |
♠ Q J 6
♥ A 5
♦ K 10 8 6 5 2
♣ J 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ K 9
♥ K Q 8 7 2
♦ 7
♣ 9 8 7 6 2 |
♠ 3 2
♥ J 10 6 4 3
♦ 9 4 3
♣ A 10 5 |
| South |
♠ A 10 8 7 5 4
♥ 9
♦ A Q J
♣ K Q 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
1♦ |
Pass |
| 1♠ |
Pass |
2♠ |
Pass |
| 4 NT |
Pass |
5♦* |
Pass |
| 6♠ |
All pass |
|
|
*Regular Blackwood; one ace
♥K
A trump lead looks highly dangerous here — partner rates to have two or three cards to an honor since declarer might easily have only three spades. The best approach to a passive lead that I can find is the diamond jack, and since your partner is marked with scattered values, it is as good as anything else.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ J 9 2
♥ A J 7 5 3
♦ J 3
♣ Q 8 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
1♣ |
| 1♥ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
1♠ |
| Pass |
2♠ |
All pass |
|
April 26th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 7 Comments
|
I’m not sure what the technical merits of having the ranges of my two no-trump opening call as 20-21 or 20-22 might be. The same applies for the range of the two no-trump rebid after opening two clubs.
Stepping Out, Tupelo, Miss.
I think one cannot get too delicate here. Use the range for the two no-trump opening as 20 to a bad 22 with the two club opening and two no-trump rebid as 22+ to 24. There are too many hands and not enough ways to describe them, and driving to game singlehandedly with fewer than 25HCP feels wrong to me.
I have recently been converted to playing the forcing no-trump in response to major-suit openings. My partner wants to play it in response to an opening in third and fourth seats too. Is that sound?
Carol Singer, Hartford, Conn.
This approach is not one I would recommend. The forcing no-trump is designed to allow you to invite at no-trump or in partner’s major. These are not hand-types one need to show as a passed hand. Drury deals with invitational hands, while with the balanced hand one can bid one no-trump then two no-trump. Playing one no-trump as non-forcing lets you stop right there with two balanced hands facing one another.
I was in fourth chair with: ♠ K-3, ♥ Q-8-6-5, ♦ J-6-5-4-2, ♣ K-J. I heard my partner open one diamond, and my RHO overcall one spade. I thought there was some merit in raising diamonds, whether to the two- or three- level, or doubling, or even bidding one no-trump. What do you say?
Pick and Shuffle, Monterey, Calif.
|
Normally when you hold four cards in the unbid major you will double first, then support partner if you can. One no-trump looks wrong with only one spade stop, and if you raise diamonds you may never find hearts. Incidentally, a jump raise of diamonds in competition is frequently played these days as preemptive rather than invitational.
What is your opinion on how one should signal at the first trick? I use attitude signals, but cannot ever agree with my partner about when suit preference and count signals should be more relevant.
Laid Back Larry, Mason City, Iowa
Join the club, Larry. Attitude signals are sometimes of relevance even when dummy has a singleton, and you can usefully signal count when you know partner already knows your attitude. But when a shift appears mandatory (or when your holding is already precisely defined) suit preference has its place. But it not only can be overdone, it frequently is.
My unremarkable hand was: ♠ J-8-2, ♥ A-5-3-2, ♦ J-5-3, ♣ K-9-4. The auction proceeded round the table: two hearts to my left, four spades from my partner, five hearts to my right. What would you do now with nobody vulnerable, and why? Would the form of scoring matter?
Under the Gun, Newark, N.J.
With the heart ace surely facing a void, I would double at pairs, and hope to beat them. If my partner has eight solid spades we may not do so, but he is at liberty to pull the double with a real freak, I think. He can trust the opponents to have a lot of hearts, plus something more. At teams, I might well bid on, unprepared to suffer a double-game swing.
|
April 25th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
There are two sides to every question.
Diogenes
| South |
North |
| Both |
♠ A Q 9 8
♥ K 9 8 3
♦ A Q 4
♣ 10 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ 10 6
♥ J 7 6 5 4
♦ 7 6
♣ J 7 4 2 |
♠ J 5 2
♥ Q 2
♦ K 10 5 2
♣ Q 9 6 5 |
| South |
♠ K 7 4 3
♥ A 10
♦ J 9 8 3
♣ A K 8 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
2♣ |
Pass |
| 2♠ |
Pass |
4♣ |
Pass |
| 4♥ |
Pass |
6♠ |
All pass |
♣4
You showed a poor hand at your first turn and a really bad one at your second turn. But your partner is still interested in game, so he must have at least a 20-count or the equivalent. I’d raise him to game, albeit without a great deal of confidence, assuming I really trusted him. I certainly wouldn’t redouble!
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 10 6
♥ J 7 6 5 4
♦ 7 6
♣ J 7 4 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| Pass |
1♦ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| 1♥ |
Pass |
2♦ |
Pass |
| 2♥ |
Pass |
3♥ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
April 24th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 5 Comments
Men were not intended to work with the accuracy of tools, to be precise and perfect in all their actions.
John Ruskin
| West |
North |
| North-South |
♠ J 6 2
♥ Q 6
♦ K J 7 4
♣ A K 9 8 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q 10 8 7
♥ K 2
♦ A 3 2
♣ Q 10 7 4 |
♠ K 9 5 4 3
♥ J 9 8 3
♦ 10 9
♣ 3 2 |
| South |
♠ A
♥ A 10 7 5 4
♦ Q 8 6 5
♣ J 6 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1♣ |
Pass |
1♥* |
| Dbl. |
2♠ |
Dbl. |
3♠ |
| Pass |
Pass |
4 NT |
Pass |
| 5♦ |
All pass |
|
|
*Spades
♠7
It would be simple just to bid five hearts here. But this hand has quite significant slam potential, so it might be more discreet not to commit your hand to a single contract. Try a bid of four no-trump, suggesting two places to play, planning to convert a response of five clubs to five hearts, making a slam-try for hearts.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A
♥ A 10 7 5 4
♦ Q 8 6 5
♣ J 6 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
3♠ |
Dbl. |
4♠ |
| ? |
|
|
|
April 23rd, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 5 Comments
Scenery is fine – but human nature is finer.
John Keats
| North |
North |
| East-West |
♠ K Q 8
♥ 4
♦ A 10 7 2
♣ A K Q 7 5 |
| West |
East |
♠ A J 9 4 3
♥ 9 7
♦ Q 8 5 3
♣ J 3 |
♠ 10 7 6 5
♥ K Q 5 3
♦ K 9
♣ 10 9 4 |
| South |
♠ 2
♥ A J 10 8 6 2
♦ J 6 4
♣ 8 6 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1♣ |
Pass |
| 1♦* |
Pass |
2♦ |
Pass |
| 2♥ |
Pass |
2 NT |
Pass |
| 4♥ |
All pass |
|
|
*Hearts
♦5
You do not have to do more than raise to three spades now. While you surely will not sell out if your partner bids just four spades, you should let your partner take control. He can ask you for aces or controls as he sees fit, and he will be better placed than you to know how far to go.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 10 7 6 5
♥ K Q 5 3
♦ K 9
♣ 10 9 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| Pass |
Pass |
2♣ |
Pass |
| 2♦ |
Pass |
2♠ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
April 22nd, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
For everything you have missed, you have gained something, and for everything you gain, you lose something.
Ralph Waldo Emerson
| East |
North |
| Neither |
♠ J 10 6 3
♥ A Q 9 7
♦ A 8 3
♣ K 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ K 7 4 2
♥ J 10 4 3 2
♦ 10 7
♣ J 2 |
♠ Q
♥ K
♦ K Q 9 6 4
♣ 10 9 7 6 5 3 |
| South |
♠ A 9 8 5
♥ 8 6 5
♦ J 5 2
♣ A Q 8 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
Pass |
| 1♦* |
Pass |
1♥ |
Pass |
| 1♠ |
Pass |
4♠ |
All pass |
*Precision
♦10
Your hand is worth an invitation to game, and the obvious suit in which you should play is diamonds (notwithstanding the fact that your clubs are better than your diamonds, your partner rates to have longer diamonds than clubs). So bid three diamonds, and let your partner decide where, if anywhere, to go from here.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A 9 8 5
♥ 8 6 5
♦ J 5 2
♣ A Q 8 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
1♦ |
Pass |
| 1♠ |
Pass |
2♣ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
April 21st, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 10 Comments
A thing long expected takes the form of the unexpected when at last it comes.
Mark Twain
| South |
North |
| North-South |
♠ J 5 2
♥ 9 5 4
♦ A 9 7 4
♣ 8 7 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ A Q 10 8 7
♥ A K J 2
♦ 5
♣ A 5 3 |
♠ 9 6 4
♥ 8 7 6
♦ K J 10 2
♣ 9 6 2 |
| South |
♠ K 3
♥ Q 10 3
♦ Q 8 6 3
♣ K Q J 10 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♦ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
Pass |
| 1♥ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
Pass |
| 2♣ |
Dbl. |
All pass |
|
♥K
Your hand is obviously worth a drive to game, but is it possible that your side can make slam? Yes it is, though you will need some fairly specific cards opposite, which partner never seems to have. Maybe if you bid three hearts and get raised to four hearts (or hear a four club cuebid from your partner) you might consider going past game.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A Q 10 8 7
♥ A K J 2
♦ 5
♣ A 5 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♠ |
Pass |
2♠ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
|
At the Dyspeptics Club, the post mortems are often more fun than watching the bridge. As a spectator remarked, what North’s comments lack in accuracy, they more than make up for in vitriol.
Against three no-trump West led the diamond queen and East scored his diamond ace, and returned the suit. Declarer won, tested hearts, then took the club finesse for his ninth trick. West won his king and cashed out for down one.
When South complained that every card was wrong, North snarled that it was his bad luck that every one of his partners was wrong-headed. That was true up to a point, but he then went on to say that the contract could always be made. He was only partly right.
When South wins the diamond king, he must strip West of his major suit cards, ending in dummy. Next he leads a diamond, and West can cash his diamonds but then has to lead into declarer’s club tenace. Equally, if East returns a club at trick two, declarer plays low and West wins the jack and exits with a diamond. The six major-suit winners reduce everyone to four cards, and so West cannot keep three winning diamonds and the club king.
There is a winning defense, but it is not one to be found at the table. East must play low at trick one, and now the defenders are a step ahead. West has two entries in clubs and that gives him an escape from the endplays.