April 25th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
There are two sides to every question.
Diogenes
| South |
North |
| Both |
♠ A Q 9 8
♥ K 9 8 3
♦ A Q 4
♣ 10 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ 10 6
♥ J 7 6 5 4
♦ 7 6
♣ J 7 4 2 |
♠ J 5 2
♥ Q 2
♦ K 10 5 2
♣ Q 9 6 5 |
| South |
♠ K 7 4 3
♥ A 10
♦ J 9 8 3
♣ A K 8 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
2♣ |
Pass |
| 2♠ |
Pass |
4♣ |
Pass |
| 4♥ |
Pass |
6♠ |
All pass |
♣4
You showed a poor hand at your first turn and a really bad one at your second turn. But your partner is still interested in game, so he must have at least a 20-count or the equivalent. I’d raise him to game, albeit without a great deal of confidence, assuming I really trusted him. I certainly wouldn’t redouble!
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 10 6
♥ J 7 6 5 4
♦ 7 6
♣ J 7 4 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| Pass |
1♦ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| 1♥ |
Pass |
2♦ |
Pass |
| 2♥ |
Pass |
3♥ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
April 24th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 5 Comments
Men were not intended to work with the accuracy of tools, to be precise and perfect in all their actions.
John Ruskin
| West |
North |
| North-South |
♠ J 6 2
♥ Q 6
♦ K J 7 4
♣ A K 9 8 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q 10 8 7
♥ K 2
♦ A 3 2
♣ Q 10 7 4 |
♠ K 9 5 4 3
♥ J 9 8 3
♦ 10 9
♣ 3 2 |
| South |
♠ A
♥ A 10 7 5 4
♦ Q 8 6 5
♣ J 6 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1♣ |
Pass |
1♥* |
| Dbl. |
2♠ |
Dbl. |
3♠ |
| Pass |
Pass |
4 NT |
Pass |
| 5♦ |
All pass |
|
|
*Spades
♠7
It would be simple just to bid five hearts here. But this hand has quite significant slam potential, so it might be more discreet not to commit your hand to a single contract. Try a bid of four no-trump, suggesting two places to play, planning to convert a response of five clubs to five hearts, making a slam-try for hearts.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A
♥ A 10 7 5 4
♦ Q 8 6 5
♣ J 6 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
3♠ |
Dbl. |
4♠ |
| ? |
|
|
|
April 23rd, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 5 Comments
Scenery is fine – but human nature is finer.
John Keats
| North |
North |
| East-West |
♠ K Q 8
♥ 4
♦ A 10 7 2
♣ A K Q 7 5 |
| West |
East |
♠ A J 9 4 3
♥ 9 7
♦ Q 8 5 3
♣ J 3 |
♠ 10 7 6 5
♥ K Q 5 3
♦ K 9
♣ 10 9 4 |
| South |
♠ 2
♥ A J 10 8 6 2
♦ J 6 4
♣ 8 6 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1♣ |
Pass |
| 1♦* |
Pass |
2♦ |
Pass |
| 2♥ |
Pass |
2 NT |
Pass |
| 4♥ |
All pass |
|
|
*Hearts
♦5
You do not have to do more than raise to three spades now. While you surely will not sell out if your partner bids just four spades, you should let your partner take control. He can ask you for aces or controls as he sees fit, and he will be better placed than you to know how far to go.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 10 7 6 5
♥ K Q 5 3
♦ K 9
♣ 10 9 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| Pass |
Pass |
2♣ |
Pass |
| 2♦ |
Pass |
2♠ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
April 22nd, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
For everything you have missed, you have gained something, and for everything you gain, you lose something.
Ralph Waldo Emerson
| East |
North |
| Neither |
♠ J 10 6 3
♥ A Q 9 7
♦ A 8 3
♣ K 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ K 7 4 2
♥ J 10 4 3 2
♦ 10 7
♣ J 2 |
♠ Q
♥ K
♦ K Q 9 6 4
♣ 10 9 7 6 5 3 |
| South |
♠ A 9 8 5
♥ 8 6 5
♦ J 5 2
♣ A Q 8 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
Pass |
| 1♦* |
Pass |
1♥ |
Pass |
| 1♠ |
Pass |
4♠ |
All pass |
*Precision
♦10
Your hand is worth an invitation to game, and the obvious suit in which you should play is diamonds (notwithstanding the fact that your clubs are better than your diamonds, your partner rates to have longer diamonds than clubs). So bid three diamonds, and let your partner decide where, if anywhere, to go from here.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A 9 8 5
♥ 8 6 5
♦ J 5 2
♣ A Q 8 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
1♦ |
Pass |
| 1♠ |
Pass |
2♣ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
April 21st, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 10 Comments
A thing long expected takes the form of the unexpected when at last it comes.
Mark Twain
| South |
North |
| North-South |
♠ J 5 2
♥ 9 5 4
♦ A 9 7 4
♣ 8 7 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ A Q 10 8 7
♥ A K J 2
♦ 5
♣ A 5 3 |
♠ 9 6 4
♥ 8 7 6
♦ K J 10 2
♣ 9 6 2 |
| South |
♠ K 3
♥ Q 10 3
♦ Q 8 6 3
♣ K Q J 10 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♦ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
Pass |
| 1♥ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
Pass |
| 2♣ |
Dbl. |
All pass |
|
♥K
Your hand is obviously worth a drive to game, but is it possible that your side can make slam? Yes it is, though you will need some fairly specific cards opposite, which partner never seems to have. Maybe if you bid three hearts and get raised to four hearts (or hear a four club cuebid from your partner) you might consider going past game.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A Q 10 8 7
♥ A K J 2
♦ 5
♣ A 5 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♠ |
Pass |
2♠ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
April 20th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 7 Comments
But what’s the odds, so long as you’re happy?
George du Maurier
| South |
North |
| Both |
♠ A J 3
♥ Q 7
♦ Q 9 2
♣ A K 8 7 6 |
| West |
East |
♠ K 9 7 6
♥ 6 3 2
♦ K J 7 4
♣ 10 4 |
♠ Q 10 8 5 4 2
♥ 9 8 5 4
♦ —
♣ J 9 5 |
| South |
♠ —
♥ A K J 10
♦ A 10 8 6 5 3
♣ Q 3 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♦ |
Pass |
2♣ |
Pass |
| 2♥ |
Pass |
2 NT |
Pass |
| 3♣ |
Pass |
3♦ |
Pass |
| 4♦ |
Pass |
4 NT |
Pass |
| 5♥ |
Pass |
6♦ |
All pass |
♠6
Since partner is marked with scattered values, I can see a good case for leading the diamond king. I agree it could cost a trick, but it might turn your heart queen into a winner via a ruff or overruff. My second choice would be a club as the most passive option, rather than a spade, I think.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ K 9 4 2
♥ Q 5
♦ K 3
♣ J 8 6 4 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
2♥ |
| All pass |
|
|
|
April 19th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 9 Comments
|
We play two over one, and recently I was criticized for my handling of this collection. I held: ♠ 10-7-2, ♥ Q-8-3, ♦ A-K-J-7-3-2, ♣ Q, and responded with a forcing one no-trump to one spade, then jumped to three spades over my partner’s two club call. I was told later that I should force to game with 12 points – but the comical denouement to this deal is that with trumps 4-1 the limit of the hand was eight tricks. Down one was a shared top!
Yellow-Bellied Sap-Sucker, Dayton, Ohio
I think you used good judgment not to force to game, since the bad trump and singleton honor make this worth less than the high cards suggest. At teams I might drive the hand to game notwithstanding that, but at pairs use your judgment, and assume your partner will understand, even if he doesn’t agree.
With what range hands should one make a splinter-raise of one’s partner? This question applies both to responder to an opening bid, and by opener to his partner’s response.
Love Lorn, Spartanburg, S.C.
In the absence of complex agreements a splinter in response to an opening shows the equivalent of an opening bid. One should not do it with a really strong hand but should start with a Jacoby Two no-trump or the equivalent. As opener, splinter in response to a one-level response with 17+, shortness, and four-card trump support. In rebidding after a one-level opening and two-level response, assuming you are already in a game force, you do not need real extras to make a splinter-bid.
Can you tell me what are the rules relating to played cards by the defenders or declarer (or dummy for that matter)? The two common issues that seem to create problems are dropped cards, or cards called by declarer then retracted.
Legal Seagull, Richmond, Va.
|
Taking your second question first: a card called for declarer but retracted in the same breath can be changed. The director should make that a high hurdle to cross, though. A dropped card – one that was clearly not intended to be played — should be retracted without penalty, though a defender may create unauthorized information for his partner in the process. Finally: to simplify what the laws says, a card held by a defender such that it can be seen by his partner should be deemed played, whereas a card is played by declarer when it touches the table.
Do you like the use of coded nines and tens in suit or no-trump play by the defense? By this I mean that both on opening lead and in mid-play, tens and nines show zero or two high honors.
Rosetta Stone, Levittown, Pa.
On opening lead my experience has been that declarer gains more from these methods than third hand. Conversely, in mid-play a defender should be able to work out when not to give away unnecessary information to declarer, so that their use makes reasonable sense.
How can I differentiate between the times to overcall in a moderate five-card suit and when to double or pass? The hand that triggered this issue was that I held: ♠ K-10-3, ♥ K-9-6-5, ♦ K-10-9-8-5, ♣ 3, and was not sure what to do over an opening call of one club on my right.
Wonder Woman, Durham, N.C.
Your hand poses an awkward problem. With minimum values and a five-card suit, I am happy to overcall, especially in a major. But with five diamonds and 4-3 in the other suits I would lean towards doubling if I had another queen. Action here is surely right; get in while you can – the quick and dirty approach is safest and most effective.
|
April 18th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 7 Comments
Pray for the repose of his soul. He was so tired.
Baron Corvo
| North |
North |
| North-South |
♠ 7 5 4
♥ 9
♦ A Q J 6 2
♣ K Q 10 9 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q J 3 2
♥ Q 7
♦ K 9 7 3
♣ 7 6 5 |
♠ K 9 8 6
♥ A 5 4
♦ 8 5
♣ A 8 3 2 |
| South |
♠ A 10
♥ K J 10 8 6 3 2
♦ 10 4
♣ J 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1♦ |
Dbl. |
| 4♥ |
All pass |
|
|
♠Q
When passed for penalties on an auction of this sort, you should run, rather than sit it out. One possibility is to bid one spade, but you have no real certainty this will be much better. One alternative is to redouble, planning to sit for one heart if partner bids it, or to redouble one diamond if that is where he escapes to.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K 9 8 6
♥ A 5 4
♦ 8 5
♣ A 8 3 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
Pass |
Pass |
| 1♣ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
April 17th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 2 Comments
In life we have to size up the chances and calculate the possible risks and our ability to deal with them and then make our plans accordingly.
Freya North
| West |
North |
| Both |
♠ 9 8
♥ J 6 3
♦ 10 7 5 4 2
♣ K 8 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ 10 6 5 4
♥ 9
♦ A
♣ A Q J 9 5 3 2 |
♠ 7 2
♥ K Q 8 7 5 2
♦ Q 9 8
♣ 10 6 |
| South |
♠ A K Q J 3
♥ A 10 4
♦ K J 6 3
♣ 7 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1♣ |
Pass |
1♥ |
| Dbl. |
3♣ |
Pass |
Pass |
| 3♠ |
Pass |
4♠ |
All pass |
♦A
Unless you have specifically agreed to the contrary, a new suit here is natural and forcing, so you cannot pass. One option is to rebid three hearts (which I would do with better heart intermediates) but as it is, I think it is better to temporize with a call of three diamonds. That might be what partner needs to hear to bid no-trump, or it might allow him to suggest heart tolerance.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 7 2
♥ K Q 8 7 5 2
♦ Q 9 8
♣ 10 6 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 2♥ |
Pass |
3♣ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
April 16th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 10 Comments
The subject of oratory alone is not truth, but persuasion.
Lord Macaulay
| South |
North |
| Both |
♠ 8 4 3
♥ 6 2
♦ K J 7 6 5 4
♣ 8 6 |
| West |
East |
♠ 9 6 5 2
♥ J 10 9 7 3
♦ —
♣ A 7 5 3 |
♠ Q J 10 7
♥ 8 5 4
♦ A 10 9 2
♣ K 2 |
| South |
♠ A K
♥ A K Q
♦ Q 8 3
♣ Q J 10 9 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 2 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
♥J
I’m not going to tell you that you will never miss game if you pass two hearts. Very occasionally your side will be able to make game. But once you have a strong no-trump to your right, game can hardly be laydown, and additionally you don’t want to stop partner from balancing in these auctions. Pass, and apologize later if you are wrong.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ Q J 10 7
♥ 8 5 4
♦ A 10 9 2
♣ K 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
1 NT |
| Pass |
Pass |
2♥ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
|
This is the last board this week from a past Yeh Bros Cup event. Reaching slam is not so hard; making it is another matter, but here are the lines chosen by a couple of successful declarers.
Bauke Muller of the Netherlands played six spades on the lead of the club four (third from an even number, low from an odd number). He won and drew trump, ending in hand, then took a diamond finesse. When the defenders continued the attack on clubs, West let go the club two – confirming an original four-card suit. Now declarer played three rounds of hearts, ruffing the third, then ruffed a club. In the three-card ending he knew East had begun with precisely three spades, two hearts and four clubs so it was marked to finesse against the diamond 10. Had West tried to conceal the club distribution, the count might have been far harder to confirm.
Paul Hackett of England also played slam here, from the North seat, on a trump lead. He won in hand and went to the club ace to take a losing diamond finesse. Back came a trump (yes, a club makes declarer’s task harder) so Hackett won and played three rounds of hearts ruffing in dummy. Then he played the last trump and took the diamond jack, and led a diamond to the ace. Now the last trump executed a double squeeze: with East guarding diamonds and West guarding hearts, neither player could keep the clubs; so trick 13 was scored by the club eight.