January 19th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 7 Comments
To dry one's eyes and laugh at a fall, And, baffled, get up and begin again.
Robert Browning
| South |
North |
| East-West |
♠ Q 10 4
♥ K 7 2
♦ J 10 9 5
♣ Q 8 7 |
| West |
East |
♠ 9 8 6 3
♥ A Q J 10 9
♦ A 6
♣ 5 4 |
♠ 5
♥ 8 5 4 3
♦ 8 7 4 3 2
♣ A 9 6 |
| South |
♠ A K J 7 2
♥ 6
♦ K Q
♣ K J 10 3 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♠ |
2♥ |
2♠ |
3♥ |
| 4♠ |
All pass |
|
|
♥A
You might look for an alternative to leading a doubleton honor into a hand that has promised at least one heart guard. But here any choice looks just as dangerous, and the one thing you know about a heart lead is that you are planning to set up a long suit, to which partner will have an entry. So lead the heart jack.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ J 7 2
♥ J 4
♦ Q 7 5 2
♣ 8 5 4 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1♥ |
1 NT |
| All pass |
|
|
|
January 18th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 8 Comments
|
What is your opinion on opening two no-trump with a weak doubleton, or with a five-card major, or indeed with both? I recently picked up ♠ A-Q-10-7-3, ♥ 9-5, ♦ A-Q-5, ♣ A-K-J, and elected to open one spade. My partner disagreed with my perception of the hand's flaws for an opening of two no-trump. What do you think?
Looking Lively, Pleasanton, Calif.
You should appreciate that all the alternatives to opening two no-trump are far more seriously flawed. You misstate the hand's strength by opening one spade — and also leave yourself without any sensible rebids no matter what partner does. Open two no-trump and settle for imperfection. The best is the enemy of the good.
Do you favor an ace or king opening lead from length holding including both cards, and what is your rationale for the choice?
Robber Baron, Atlanta, Ga.
The king from ace-king for me. The only real problem holding opposite an ambiguous king lead is something like jack-third (and this really only presents a problem with dummy holding neither the queen nor ace, and 3-plus cards. In other words, you generally know when to signal attitude and when not. Additionally, this method lets an ace lead deny the king.
How much do you need to make a free bid in response to a take-out double? In second seat after hearing the auction start one diamond – pass — one no-trump double – two clubs, should I bid two spades holding: ♠ J-9-7-3, ♥ 7-5, ♦ 10-8-6-5, ♣ A-7-4, or is passing more discreet?
Entry-Level, Great Falls, Mont.
This hand is on the cusp for acting. I probably would stretch to bid, buoyed by the fact that my failure to act initially or cuebid two diamonds now limits my hand a little. But make my side-suit shape flatter and I could be persuaded to pass, especially if the vulnerability was against me.
|
Holding: ♠ 10-8-6-5, ♥ K-2, ♦ Q-9-8-6-3 ♣ A 4 I heard my partner open one diamond, and my RHO overcall one heart. I thought all three of the choices of raising diamonds to the two- or three-level, doubling, or bidding one no-trump had merit. What do you say?
Spoiled for Choice, Boise, Idaho
When you hold support for partner's minor and four cards in the other major you will normally double first, then support partner. Bidding one spade shows five here, of course. One no-trump looks wrong with only one heart stop, and if you raise diamonds you may never find spades. By the way, remember that a jump raise of diamonds in competition is frequently played these days as preemptive rather than invitational.
I wonder if you could tell me what criteria one should use as to whether to pass or open (and if the latter, at what level) a hand like: ♠ Q-10-6-5-4-3, ♥ A-J, ♦ Q-J-5, ♣ J-3. How do position and vulnerability – or even the form of scoring – affect this question?
Careful Does It, Montgomery, Ala.
Almost any 11-count without a vulnerable singleton honor is a one-level opening for me. Change the diamond five into a small club and I might open two spades in second seat. The most important piece of advice I can give is always to open when you have a good suit. No hand with a good suit falls between a weak-two and one-level opening bid. You can pass a hand with a bad suit, of course. This applies at any form of scoring. In second seat be more disciplined than in first and surely in third seat.
|
January 17th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 8 Comments
Vanity can easily overtake wisdom. It usually overtakes common sense.
Julian Casablancas
| East |
North |
| East-West |
♠ A 5
♥ A K 10 2
♦ 7 3
♣ A K J 9 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q 7
♥ J 8 5 4
♦ A K Q 2
♣ Q 10 5 |
♠ K J 9 8 6 4 3
♥ 7 3
♦ J 6 5
♣ 3 |
| South |
♠ 10 2
♥ Q 9 6
♦ 10 9 8 4
♣ 8 7 6 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
3♠ |
| Pass |
Pass |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| 4♣ |
Pass |
5♣ |
All pass |
♦K
There is a real temptation to raise to three hearts, but if you play New Minor Forcing (where a bid of two clubs is forcing and the way you start describing most invitational or game-forcing hands) then this sequence is weak and denies invitational values with both majors. North should have less than invitational values, and you should pass and hope to go plus.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 7
♥ J 8 5 4
♦ A K Q 2
♣ Q 10 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♦ |
Pass |
1♠ |
Pass |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
2♥ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
January 16th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Friday, January 2nd, 2015
We must change (our ideas) when they have served their purpose, as we change a blunt lancet that we have used long enough.
Claude Bernard
| West |
North |
| Both |
♠ 6 2
♥ Q 9 2
♦ 9 5 4 3
♣ A K J 10 |
| West |
East |
♠ A 4
♥ A K J 7 4 3
♦ Q 7 6
♣ Q 5 |
♠ 9 7 5 3
♥ 8
♦ 10 8 2
♣ 9 8 7 3 2 |
| South |
♠ K Q J 10 8
♥ 10 6 5
♦ A K J
♣ 6 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
1♥ |
Pass |
Pass |
| Dbl. |
2♥ |
Pass |
Pass |
| 2♠ |
Pass |
3♠ |
All pass |
♥K
The pessimistic options would be to pass two hearts, or give preference to two spades. This hand feels a little too good for those cautious actions. With three working cards for my partner, I would guess to raise to three hearts, as an invitation. Yes, I am a trump short, but I've done worse.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 6 2
♥ Q 9 2
♦ 9 5 4 3
♣ A K J 10 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1♠ |
Pass |
| 1 NT |
2♦ |
2♥ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
January 15th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
Oh, 'tis a glorious thing, I ween, To be a regular Royal Queen! No half-and-half affair I mean, But a regular Royal Queen!
W. S. Gilbert
| North |
North |
| Neither |
♠ A 10 6
♥ A 4
♦ K 10 9 7
♣ A 10 7 6 |
| West |
East |
♠ J 9 8 3 2
♥ K 7 2
♦ 6 4 3 2
♣ 9 |
♠ —
♥ Q J 10 9 8 6
♦ A Q 8 5
♣ Q 8 5 |
| South |
♠ K Q 7 5 4
♥ 5 3
♦ J
♣ K J 4 3 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1 NT |
2♥* |
| 2 NT** |
3♥ |
Pass |
Pass |
| 3♠ |
Pass |
4♠ |
Pass |
| Pass |
Dbl. |
All pass |
|
*Hearts and a minor
**Lebensohl
♥2
Despite the attractive prospects this hand held when you picked it up, the hand has turned to ashes. With no obvious spade or club fit having emerged, since you have neither aces, nor any fit for diamonds, you should pass two diamonds, and hope to make it.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K Q 7 5 4
♥ 5 3
♦ J
♣ K J 4 3 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
Pass |
1♦ |
Pass |
| 1♠ |
Pass |
2♦ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
January 14th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 8 Comments
Take therefore no thought for the morrow; for the morrow shall take thought for the things of itself.
Book of Matthew
| North |
North |
| East-West |
♠ A K 9 7 3
♥ 5 4 3
♦ A 7 3
♣ A Q |
| West |
East |
♠ 10 8 4
♥ 8 6 2
♦ K 10 5 2
♣ 10 3 2 |
♠ Q 5 2
♥ A K 7
♦ J 9 6 4
♣ J 5 4 |
| South |
♠ J 6
♥ Q J 10 9
♦ Q 8
♣ K 9 8 7 6 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1♠ |
Pass |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
2 NT |
Pass |
| 3 NT |
All pass |
|
|
♥8
There are two questions here. The first is whether to go low with a response of three hearts, or to commit the hand to game. In the latter case the next question is whether to bid four hearts or to offer a choice of games with a four diamond cuebid. Given the solidity of the heart spots, a 4-3 fit may play just fine, so I would bid four hearts here.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ J 6
♥ Q J 10 9
♦ Q 8
♣ K 9 8 7 6 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| Pass |
3♦ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
January 13th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Tuesday, December 30th, 2014
With regard to excellence, it is not enough to know, but we must try to have and use it.
Aristotle
| South |
North |
| Both |
♠ K 4 2
♥ Q 6 4 3
♦ 8
♣ K J 10 3 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ J 7
♥ A K 8 7 5
♦ 9 7 6 4
♣ 8 4 |
♠ A 9 5
♥ J 10
♦ K J 10 5
♣ 9 7 6 5 |
| South |
♠ Q 10 8 6 3
♥ 9 2
♦ A Q 3 2
♣ A Q |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♠ |
Pass |
2♠ |
Pass |
| 3♦ |
Pass |
4♠ |
All pass |
♥K
It is tempting to do more than raise to three clubs, but bear in mind that a singleton diamond is not exactly an asset, your spade king looks poorly placed, and your heart queen my well be worthless. Three clubs is quite enough here – though to do less would be extremely cowardly.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K 4 2
♥ Q 6 4 3
♦ 8
♣ K J 10 3 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1♦ |
Pass |
| 1♥ |
1♠ |
2♣ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
January 12th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 3 Comments
Valiant in velvet, light in ragged luck, Most vain, most generous, sternly critical, Buffon and poet, lover and sensualist.
W. E. Henley
| North |
North |
| East-West |
♠ 7 6
♥ 9 5
♦ K Q 6 4 3 2
♣ J 5 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ 10 3
♥ J 7 4 3 2
♦ A 10
♣ 10 7 6 2 |
♠ J 9 8 5 2
♥ K Q 8
♦ 8 7 5
♣ Q 4 |
| South |
♠ A K Q 4
♥ A 10 6
♦ J 9
♣ A K 9 8 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
2♦ |
Pass |
| 2 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
Pass |
| 6 NT |
All pass |
|
|
♣7
Even though you may be ruffing with trump tricks, you should lead your singleton club, since it also rates to set up winners for your side. More importantly, nothing else is very attractive – is it?
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 9 8 3
♥ J 8 3 2
♦ A 10 4 3
♣ 8 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| Pass |
Pass |
1♣ |
1♠ |
| Dbl. |
Pass |
2♣ |
2♠ |
| All pass |
|
|
|
January 11th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 11 Comments
|
Do you take an interest in bridge played in Europe? Which countries are currently strongest outside the US? I know Italy used to be at the very top, but I read that their team had broken up. As an Italian-American I take a passing interest in these things!
Azzurri, Fayetteville, N.C.
The Italian team was sponsored for many year by Madame Lavazza, of the coffee manufacturing family. She is no longer directly involved in international play, and the team has therefore fragmented but it may yet resume or re-form. They failed to qualify for the next major world championships – an indication of at least a temporary decline.
I found myself in fourth chair holding: ♠ K-J-6-3-2, ♥ Q-9, ♦ 8-3, ♣ Q-10-4-3 and heard my partner overcall one heart over one diamond. My RHO upped the ante to two diamonds, and I did not know if I had enough to bid. Can you advise me, if I should act, and if so whether a call of two spades would be more appropriate than a raise to two hearts.
Advance with Caution, Detroit, Mich.
Supporting with a decent hand and a strong doubleton may be a reasonable option on some occasions, but there is a better call to describe your hand. Doubling two diamonds should not be for penalty of a bid and supported suit. It should show the unbid suits, and values. Admittedly, you have a minimum for the action, but you have the perfect shape for the call.
Could you please help me solve this bidding problem which came up at a club game? My partner opened two diamonds, and holding: ♠ K-10-9-8-2, ♥ K-Q-J-3-2, ♦ Q, ♣ K-4 I looked for a fit by bidding spades then hearts. This was not a success; we ended in four hearts, down four. What should I have bid here?
Ray of Sunshine, Montreal
|
After a preempt, the target for both sides is to reach the best contract possible, not the best possible spot. Here you MIGHT have a spade or heart fit, but you rate not to. And if you do find a 5-3 fit you might still play better in the minor. In conclusion, pass two diamonds and hope your partner can come close to making it.
I had one of my best hands of the month today, and was unsure what to bid after I had opened one heart and heard a one spade response. My hand was: ♠ Q-J, ♥ A-J-7-4-3, ♦ A-2, ♣ K-Q-J-4. How do you rate the choice between three clubs and two no-trumps?
Upwardly Mobile, West Palm Beach, Fla.
A call of three clubs would be a game force and a slight overbid (though throw in some better heart intermediates and you are not far off the target). With such disparity in the minors, a call of two no-trumps feels undescriptive, so my choice would be to bid two clubs, hoping not to play there. But if we do, a partscore may well be the limit of the hand.
If I open with one no trump, should my partner respond into the better of his five-card suits, or into the worse suit?
Running to Daylight, San Francisco, Calif.
I'm assuming you have two five-card suits and enough to be looking for game. In that case Stayman and transfers are the tools to help you find a fit. Stayman will help you find a fit in the major, while transferring and bidding again will show your partner what you have. Neither of these initial actions guarantees values, though. You would transfer into a major with five or six cards in that suit, and a Yarborough.
|
January 10th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
The man recovered of the bite, The dog it was that died.
Oliver Goldsmith
| North |
North |
| East-West |
♠ 5 2
♥ A K Q J 9
♦ Q J 6 3
♣ Q 10 |
| West |
East |
♠ A Q 8 7 3
♥ 8 6
♦ K 10 4
♣ 6 3 2 |
♠ J 10 9 6
♥ 10 7 4 3 2
♦ 7
♣ K 5 4 |
| South |
♠ K 4
♥ 5
♦ A 9 8 5 2
♣ A J 9 8 7 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1♥ |
Pass |
| 2♦ |
Pass |
3♦ |
Pass |
| 3 NT |
All pass |
|
|
♠7
Having shown your minor-suit pattern accurately, you should now bid three no-trump, to indicate you have a spade card. Let your partner look at his own hand and decide what to do next. You have painted him a nice picture of what you have.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K 4
♥ 5
♦ A 9 8 5 2
♣ A J 9 8 7 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♦ |
Pass |
1♥ |
Pass |
| 2♣ |
Pass |
2♠ |
Pass |
| 3♣ |
Pass |
3♦ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
|
In today's deal the slip that declarer made was an elementary one, but the play seemed so straightforward that many players would relax, expecting to have 10 tricks on top, and would not see the significance of their mistake.
Against four spades West decided to go for a forcing defense by leading the heart ace then queen. It looks normal for South to take this with the king and discard a club from hand, assuming that he would simply lose the two minor-suit aces in the fullness of time.
This was what our declarer did, but he paid for his carelessness by going down. He drew two rounds of trump to find the bad news, then advanced the diamond king, and West won the first diamond (if he ducks, declarer reverts to clubs and survives unscathed) and played a third heart to reduce declarer to trump equality with him. Now declarer tried the club king. When East ducked, declarer played a second club and East won and gave his partner a club ruff. Had declarer drawn trump before playing a second club, the defenders could have run the hearts when in with the club ace.
The correct discard at trick two is a diamond. Declarer then draws trumps and continues by playing on clubs. The defenders can take their ace and force declarer again, but he runs his winners and concedes trick 13 to the diamond ace. In retrospect it is hard to imagine why one would take any other approach…and yet, the mistake is hardly an unreasonable one.