March 16th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 2 Comments
Criticism is easy, art is difficult.
Philippe Destouches
| South |
North |
| East-West |
♠ 9 8
♥ 10 5 2
♦ A K 8 6 4
♣ 5 4 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ K J 7 4
♥ J 8 6 3
♦ 10
♣ J 10 9 6 |
♠ 10 3 2
♥ Q 9 7
♦ Q J 7 3
♣ 8 7 2 |
| South |
♠ A Q 6 5
♥ A K 4
♦ 9 5 2
♣ A K Q |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 2 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
♣J
Your partner is marked with at least scattered values and close to a maximum pass. The question is whether to go aggressive; if you did, you would probably lead a club rather than a heart, since even though dummy rates not to have long majors, your club holding is relatively safe. Or you could try to go passive with a spade. I vote for clubs, but make the club 10 the nine and I might change my mind.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ 10 5 4
♥ K 7 6 3
♦ Q 5
♣ J 10 3 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
Pass |
Pass |
2 NT |
| All pass |
|
|
|
March 15th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 14 Comments
|
Assuming you need five tricks with no outside information, holding the doubleton queen in dummy, and A-K-10-3-2 in hand, after playing the queen, is the percentage play to play for the drop or to finesse the 10?
Witch of Eastwick, Trenton, N.J.
The answer is a tossup. The math says the chance of a 3-3 break is just over one third, and the chance of a doubleton jack is one in six. So the chance of playing from the top is just fractionally over one half. Just for the record, with Q-10 facing A-K-4-3-2 the best line is to lead low to the 10, rather than playing for the drop.
After you hear your partner open one heart, and the next hand overcalls two clubs, would you start with a negative double, as I did, holding: ♠ A-Q-3-2, ♥ 5-3, ♦ K-Q-3, ♣ J-9-4-2? If so, partner responds two spades, and you have to make a rebid. What would be your choice now?
Finding Nemo, Asheville, N.C.
You are by no means guaranteed to have an eight-card spade fit, as partner may have been forced to bid a three-card suit, so it would be premature to raise to four spades. I would bid two no-trumps, suggesting invitational values with a club stopper, surely holding four spades, else you would not have doubled in the first place. Your partner can now choose the strain and level he wants to play at.
I'm trying to learn how to make my opponents' life more difficult as declarer. Is there a general rule as to whether declarer, as fourth hand, should win the trick with the bottom or the top card from a sequence of equals? Similarly, when following suit, should one follow with the top or bottom of a sequence?
Harry Houdini, Seattle, Wash.
|
There is a general rule — with one common exception. When following suit or winning a trick, play the higher of equals, which will generally help to confuse opponents about the location of the lower honor. But at no-trump, when winning the first trick when holding either the ace-king or ace-king-queen, take the trick with the king.
Were you at the recent world championships in Sanya, China? Do you have any comment on how the events were run?
Grocer Jack, Chicago
I was not at the tournament, which seems to have been less popular than many of the recent big championships. Perhaps this was the distance of Sanya from Europe and most major cities? I know there were Internet problems and logistical problems at the event, but I fear these are the norm rather than the exception nowadays.
As opener I was unsure how forcing a new suit by responder should be at his second turn. I was recently dealt ♠ K-4, ♥ J-7-2, ♦ Q-3, ♣ A-Q-9-7-5-4, and opened one club, then rebid two clubs over my partner's response of one spade. What was I supposed to bid over my partner's call of two diamonds — is that call forcing, encouraging or weak?
Trumpet Voluntary, Elmira, N.Y.
A new suit by responder is forcing, even by a passed hand. Your duties are to support partner's first suit with three trumps or a strong doubleton, to rebid no-trump if you have the fourth suit controlled, or otherwise to make any other natural and descriptive call. Here supporting to two spades seems right — partner should not expect you to have three good trumps, since you might already have raised him.
|
March 14th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 2 Comments
Thinking to me is the greatest fatigue in the world.
Sir John Vanbrugh
| South |
North |
| Neither |
♠ 10
♥ Q J 3
♦ J 10 9 4 2
♣ K 7 5 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ J 7 4 2
♥ 5 2
♦ K Q 8 7
♣ Q 9 6 |
♠ A 8 5 3
♥ 9 7
♦ 6 3
♣ J 10 8 4 3 |
| South |
♠ K Q 9 6
♥ A K 10 8 6 4
♦ A 5
♣ A |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♥ |
Pass |
2♥ |
Pass |
| 6♥ |
All pass |
|
|
♦K
It is tempting to advance with a call of one no-trump, but this hand seems generally too weak for that call. Yes, spades may not be our side's best spot, but the risks associated with bidding and getting the auction too high are surely more significant. If the opponents decide to double one spade for penalty, you may change your mind as to where to play.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 10
♥ Q J 3
♦ J 10 9 4 2
♣ K 7 5 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
1♣ |
1♠ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
March 13th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 8 Comments
Personally I think that competition should be encouraged in war and sport and business, but that it makes no sense in the arts. If an artist is good, nobody else can do what he or she does and therefore all comparisons are incoherent.
Edward St. Aubyn
| South |
North |
| Neither |
♠ Q 7 5
♥ 10 8
♦ K J 6 4 2
♣ 10 8 5 |
| West |
East |
♠ J 10 9 6
♥ 7 6 4 2
♦ 10 5 3
♣ A 7 |
♠ A K 8 3
♥ 5 3
♦ Q 9 7
♣ Q 6 4 2 |
| South |
♠ 4 2
♥ A K Q J 9
♦ A 8
♣ K J 9 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♥ |
Pass |
1 NT |
Pass |
| 3♣ |
Pass |
3♥ |
Pass |
| 4♥ |
All pass |
|
|
♠J
Painful as it may be to sell out here, it seems to me that your best chance to go plus here is to pass. You showed an extremely good hand and could not get your partner interested in bidding on. Surely he would have acted with any weak hand with heart support, so your best chance here may be to pass and hope to beat three diamonds.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 4 2
♥ A K Q J 9
♦ A 8
♣ K J 9 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
Pass |
Pass |
1♦ |
| Dbl. |
1♠ |
Pass |
Pass |
| 2♥ |
3♦ |
Pass |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
March 12th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 20 Comments
No man who is correctly informed as to the past will be disposed to take a morose or desponding view of the present.
Lord Macaulay
| South |
North |
| Both |
♠ 4 3
♥ K J 9
♦ J 10 6 4
♣ 9 8 6 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ A 9 8 7 5
♥ 8 7 4
♦ K 7
♣ 10 4 3 |
♠ Q J 10
♥ 6 5
♦ 9 8 5 2
♣ K Q 7 5 |
| South |
♠ K 6 2
♥ A Q 10 3 2
♦ A Q 3
♣ A J |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 2 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
♠7
Your partner's double is take-out, suggesting real extras, but your hand seems eminently suitable for defense. I would pass expecting partner to have a strong hand with maybe 4-4-2-3 pattern and 18+ points, and that the opponents would have nowhere to run.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 4 3
♥ K J 9
♦ J 10 6 4
♣ 9 8 6 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| Pass |
1♠ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| 2♣ |
2♦ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
March 11th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 8 Comments
To see what is in front of one's nose requires a constant struggle.
George Orwell
| South |
North |
| Neither |
♠ J 8 5
♥ 10 9 7 2
♦ J 5 2
♣ A K Q |
| West |
East |
♠ 9 7 6 3
♥ A K J 4
♦ A 10 6
♣ 7 3 |
♠ 4
♥ Q 8 6 5
♦ Q 9 8 4 3
♣ 5 4 2 |
| South |
♠ A K Q 10 2
♥ 3
♦ K 7
♣ J 10 9 8 6 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♠ |
Pass |
1 NT* |
Pass |
| 2♣ |
Pass |
3♠ |
Pass |
| 4♠ |
All pass |
|
|
*Forcing
♥K
To me this is a textbook raise to three no-trumps without going through Stayman. Factors in favor of this approach are the combination of your excellent values coupled with square side-suit shape and weak hearts, all of which argue that finding hearts might be the only way to go minus. And the simple raise gives far less away about your and your partner's shape to the opening leader.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 8 5 2
♥ 10 9 7 2
♦ J 5 2
♣ A K Q |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
Pass |
2 NT |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
March 10th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
If you care enough for a result, you will most certainly attain it.
William James
| South |
North |
| East-West |
♠ 8 5
♥ A 6
♦ A Q 7 5 4
♣ 8 6 4 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ J 10 9 3
♥ J 8
♦ K 10 8 6
♣ Q J 9 |
♠ Q 7 6 4 2
♥ Q 10 9 2
♦ 2
♣ K 10 2 |
| South |
♠ A K
♥ K 7 5 4 3
♦ J 9 3
♣ A 7 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
♠J
You have more than enough to bid on here, given your double fit plus the knowledge of partner being really short in spades. But bidding four hearts would be lazy; you must bid four clubs to keep partner in the picture and to help him judge the five- or six-level. Would it amaze you if you were cold for slam in either clubs or hearts? It certainly wouldn't surprise me!
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 7 6 4 2
♥ Q 10 9 2
♦ 2
♣ K 10 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1♥ |
Pass |
| 2♥ |
2♠ |
3♣ |
3♠ |
| ? |
|
|
|
March 9th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 19 Comments
Misery still delights to trace Its semblance in another’s case.
William Cowper
| South |
North |
| Neither |
♠ A J 10 7 4
♥ A 9 5
♦ 4 2
♣ Q 6 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ 3
♥ Q 8 7 6 2
♦ K 8 3
♣ J 10 7 2 |
♠ 5
♥ K J 10 3
♦ J 9 7 6
♣ K 9 8 3 |
| South |
♠ K Q 9 8 6 2
♥ 4
♦ A Q 10 5
♣ A 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♠ |
Pass |
2 NT |
Pass |
| 3♥ |
Pass |
3♠ |
Pass |
| 4 NT |
Pass |
5♥ |
Pass |
| 5 NT |
Pass |
6♠ |
All pass |
♥6
I don't particularly like the trump lead here (dummy rates to be very short and we might be pickling partner's vulnerable honor. So though I am not a fan of leading doubletons in declarer's suit, I will start off with the diamond eight, knowing that the auction has suggested to my partner that declarer won't be overloaded in diamonds, and thus he may work out not to give me a ruff.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ A 10 6 5
♥ 9 6 4
♦ 8 5
♣ A Q 4 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| Pass |
1♦ |
Pass |
1♥ |
| Pass |
2♣ |
Pass |
2♥ |
| All pass |
|
|
|
March 8th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 7 Comments
|
When you open one no-trump and partner responds with Stayman, how do you deal with intervention? Can you ever bid at the three-level?
Coping Mechanism, Texarkana, Texas
If the opponents double, the simple option is to redouble to show very good clubs, while two diamonds shows real diamonds, and pass is the default call with nothing to say. A more sophisticated approach is to pass without a stopper and use any action to show a stopper. Over higher intervention, bid at the two-level if you can, with double penalties. Bids at the three-level show a five-card major and a maximum.
I got criticized for opening the following hand: ♠ A-Q-3-2, ♥ Q-J-3, ♦ 10, ♣ Q-9-4-3-2. Where do you stand on this, and would your position change depending on position or vulnerability?
Light Brigade, Bremerton, Wash.
5-4 hand patterns with easy rebids are tempting to open. I'd be much happier with a little more in my long suit or chunkier intermediates; but non-vulnerable I don't need much convincing to get in there. This is especially so in first or third seat.
I picked up: ♠ 10-7-4, ♥ Q-10-8-5, ♦ A-Q-9-5, ♣ A-Q and opened one diamond in second seat. My LHO overcalled one spade, partner made a negative double, and my RHO raised to two spades. Should I bid three hearts now or pass?
Lone Granger, Fresno, Calif.
I think your weak spade length is favorable for action. Bidding three hearts is certainly reasonable here, but there is a conventional gadget that might allow you to distinguish between a real invitation and a purely competitive action. Details of how to use a call of two no-trump as artificial (the so-called good-bad two no-trump) can be found here.
|
In fourth seat, not vulnerable, I held ♠ J-10-9-7-6-5, ♥ J-5-3, ♦ A-4, ♣ 6-4. My LHO, vulnerable, opened with one spade, which my partner doubled. My RHO passed, and after some thought so did I. We set the contract two tricks, for 500 points. My partner insists I should have bid one no trump, allowing him to bid at the two-level. My argument is that even plus 110 or 140 versus the 200 that I considered probable was a poor return.
Hair Gel, Albuquerque, N.M.
I like your reasoning – it is the 9-7 of trumps that persuade me! If your partner cannot be convinced by the result that you achieved at the table, he is indeed a hard nut to crack.
In yesterday's Casper Wyoming Tribune, the partner used Blackwood, but opener's response was five spades with only one ace. Why wasn't the response five diamonds?
Goodnight Irene, Casper, Wyo.
My apologies for losing the footnote that should have gone with the Roman Keycard Blackwood response. Bridge Guys’ definition sets out how this version of Blackwood allows you to find out about the trump king and queen. This is by no means an essential part of modern bidding but honesty compels me to admit that more and more players do use a gadget of this sort when asking for aces.
|
March 7th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 2 Comments
His imagination resembled the wings of an ostrich. It enabled him to run, though not to soar.
Lord Macaulay
| North |
North |
| Both |
♠ 10 8 6 2
♥ A Q J 7 6
♦ Q J 10
♣ A |
| West |
East |
♠ 3
♥ 10 9 5
♦ K 7 6 3
♣ Q J 10 9 4 |
♠ Q 9 7 5
♥ 8 3
♦ 8 4 2
♣ K 8 5 3 |
| South |
♠ A K J 4
♥ K 4 2
♦ A 9 5
♣ 7 6 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1♥ |
Pass |
| 1♠ |
Pass |
3♠ |
Pass |
| 4 NT |
Pass |
5♥* |
Pass |
| 6♠ |
All pass |
|
|
*Two keycards and no trump queen
♣Q
It bears repeating that the flipside of playing negative doubles is that you are compelled to re-open in these sequences with shortage in the opponents’ suit. Here you have the perfect shape to double, and anything your partner does will be fine by you (though you are of course hoping for a penalty pass from your partner).
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 10 8 6 2
♥ A Q J 7 6
♦ Q J 10
♣ A |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♥ |
2♣ |
Pass |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
|
Nobody ever pretended that bridge is a simple game, and all too often what makes it especially complicated is the inability to see the wood for the trees. Very few deals boil down to a simple analysis of requiring a specific number of tricks from one suit -there are all too often complicating factors which require you to play off one suit combination against another.
However, today’s deal is one where, if playing teams or rubber bridge, we can focus on a single theme and not worry too much about the other suits. Playing three no-trump on a top club lead from West, we can win in hand and should concentrate our energies on making nine tricks. With six sure winners outside diamonds, and no obvious danger suit, we simply require to take three diamond tricks. If we only need three tricks in the suit we can afford to lose two tricks, so at trick two we simply duck a diamond. East might do best to overtake his partner’s 10 and shift to a spade. If he does so, we duck his play of a low spade, and cover his 10 with the queen. On regaining the lead we can advance the diamond nine, planning to cover an honor from West, or duck again if West discards on this trick. Whatever happens after that, we can ensure our nine tricks against any lie of the cards.
Note that if you take either the first or second round of diamonds, the contract becomes unmakable.