December 30th, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 8 Comments
A smile is the chosen vehicle for all ambiguities.
Herman Melville
| East |
North |
| East-West |
♠ J 8 4
♥ K J 10 5 3
♦ 8 3 2
♣ 8 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ —
♥ 9 7 6 4 2
♦ A J 7 5 4
♣ Q J 9 |
♠ A 9 2
♥ A Q 8
♦ 9 6
♣ A K 10 6 5 |
| South |
♠ K Q 10 7 6 5 3
♥ —
♦ K Q 10
♣ 7 3 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
1 NT |
| 3♠ |
Dbl. |
4♠ |
Dbl. |
| All pass |
|
|
|
♣Q
Even when you are a passed hand, you should beware of responding at the two-level with a five-card suit and less than real invitational values. Here, for example, a response of two diamonds would be acceptable if your heart two was the diamond queen. However, on your actual hand it is wiser to respond one no-trump, so as to avoid having to play in spades unless your partner really wants to do so.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ —
♥ 8 7 6 4 2
♦ A J 7 5 4
♣ Q J 10 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| Pass |
Pass |
1♠ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
December 29th, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 3 Comments
You see, but you do not observe.
Sir Arthur Conan Doyle
| West |
North |
| East-West |
♠ 7 6 4
♥ 10 6 5 2
♦ A Q J 10 8
♣ K |
| West |
East |
♠ A K J 8 3
♥ K
♦ 7 2
♣ Q 6 4 3 2 |
♠ Q 9 2
♥ 9 8 4
♦ K 5 4
♣ 10 9 8 7 |
| South |
♠ 10 5
♥ A Q J 7 3
♦ 9 6 3
♣ A J 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
1♠ |
Pass |
Pass |
| 2♥ |
Pass |
2♠ |
Pass |
| 4♥ |
All pass |
|
|
♠K
There is no good reason not to lead hearts here. I can make a decent case for leading the queen rather than a low heart, since if dummy has the king, and your partner the ace-jack, you might in this way be able to lead hearts repeatedly, and force declarer to ruff, thus depriving him of trump control. I'm not sure I'd make this play without the heart 10.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ K 8 4 2
♥ Q 10 3
♦ Q 8 2
♣ J 9 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| Pass |
1♦ |
1♥ |
1♠ |
| 2♥ |
Pass |
Pass |
2♠ |
| All pass |
|
|
|
December 28th, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 2 Comments
|
My partner opened the bidding in second seat with one club, and my RHO overcalled two hearts. I responded three diamonds, assuming it to be forcing, but my partner passed with a minimum and a misfit. My partner says my three diamonds bid is just competitive and if I wanted to force I should double. I contend that as an unpassed responder, my new suit response is forcing. I can see the logic in each argument. What do you say?
Miked Up, Harrisburg, Pa.
I'm delighted to say you are right and he is wrong. After an overcall, new suits by an unpassed responder are all natural and forcing – for one round, though not to game. However, new suits at the three-level are game-forcing. Yes, you can double with moderate hands hoping to get a second shot but you must bid your good hands out at once to avoid being preempted out of your suit.
I moved East from San Francisco, and almost everyone of the players here is a Life Master of one kind or another. They defend with something called "odd or even" though they have never learned to count! Do you recommend I should take this up, or try to persuade them to take up something else instead?
Nonplussed Newbie, Spartanburg, S.C.
Odd/Even discards are somewhat sophisticated but not a bad idea. (This Bridge Hands link might help.) Their benefit is that you do not have to discard from the suit you like to get the message across. Give them a try – but encourage your partner to count too…
As a refugee from a style 50 years ago, where jumps were strong, I realize I have a lot to learn. When it is correct to play jump raises as preemptive, and when to play a more traditional style of limit or forcing raise?
Dinosaur Dan, Wausau, Wis.
|
In uncontested auctions you need both a limit raise and a forcing raise. (In the majors that would be shown by a jump raise and Jacoby two no-trump, while in the minors the inverted raise is the way to show at least a limit raise). In contested auctions the focus changes, to require you to be able to raise partner as fast and safely as possible; jump-raises are made with distributional hands. A cue-bid (or a jump to two no-trump after an opening bid gets doubled) shows a limit raise or better.
I recently misread an auction where my partner balanced over one heart with a call of one spade; then when opener competed to two diamonds, my partner balanced again, this time with a double. Should this be penalty, cards, or take-out?
Desperately Seeking Sanity, Dover, Del.
After overcalling or balancing, most doubles facing a silent partner are for take-out. Here I expect your partner might be something like 4-5 or 3-5 in the unbid suits, with at least opening values, unwilling to sell out when the opponents appear to have found a fit.
I passed in first chair with: ♠ A-J-8-7-2, ♥ 10-2, ♦ K-9-3-2, ♣ Q-4 and responded one spade to my partner's one heart opening bid. What was my best course of action over his two-club rebid?
More or Less, Panama City, Fla.
As a passed hand you could bid two diamonds, the fourth suit, or make a natural bid of two no-trump, both of which are only a trifle optimistic; give me the diamond 10 in addition and I'd follow the latter route. As an alternative, giving preference to two hearts is better than rebidding the spades. Your hand offers a ruffing value, and you know you have at least a partial fit in hearts.
|
December 27th, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 8 Comments
All men are liable to error, and most men are, I many points by passion or interest, under temptation to it.
John Locke
| North |
North |
| Neither |
♠ A K Q 10 8
♥ A K Q J 10
♦ 4
♣ K Q |
| West |
East |
♠ 6
♥ 9 5 3
♦ A Q 10 9 7 5 3 2
♣ 2 |
♠ J 7 5 4 2
♥ 6 2
♦ 8 6
♣ 10 9 8 5 |
| South |
♠ 9 3
♥ 8 7 4
♦ K J
♣ A J 7 6 4 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
2♣ |
Pass |
| 3♣ |
5♦ |
6♦ |
Pass |
| 6 NT |
All pass |
|
|
♥5
It is acceptable to preempt with six clubs, since no weak-two bid is available, but only if non-vulnerable. Also, the suit should have at least two of the top four clubs and not too much outside defense. The flaws here are that you might lose many trump tricks facing a singleton, while taking too many tricks on defense. I'd pass; change the club three to the 10 and you could sell me on the action.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 9 3
♥ 8 7 4
♦ K J
♣ A J 7 6 4 3 |
December 26th, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 5 Comments
When I consider how my life is spent, I hardly ever repent.
Ogden Nash
| South |
North |
| East-West |
♠ A 10 2
♥ Q 4
♦ A Q 6
♣ A Q 10 7 6 |
| West |
East |
♠ 9 8 5
♥ 7 5
♦ 9 7 4 3
♣ J 8 5 2 |
♠ K 7 4
♥ A K 10 9 8 6 2
♦ K J 2
♣ — |
| South |
♠ Q J 6 3
♥ J 3
♦ 10 8 5
♣ K 9 4 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| Pass |
Pass |
1♣ |
4♥ |
| Pass |
Pass |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| 4♠ |
All pass |
|
|
♥7
A jump to two no-trump suggests your basic hand type (balanced with 18-19 high cards). Do not worry about the weak heart stopper, let partner know what you have and expect such minor flaws to balance out in the long run. This way you let your partner take control and find a spade or club fit, as appropriate.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A 10 2
♥ Q 4
♦ A Q 6
♣ A Q 10 7 6 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♣ |
Pass |
1♠ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
December 25th, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 5 Comments
I would rather be right than President.
Henry Clay
| North |
North |
| East-West |
♠ A K 9 4 2
♥ 4 3
♦ 9 2
♣ K J 9 6 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q J 10 6 5
♥ A J 9 7
♦ A
♣ A 4 2 |
♠ 8 7
♥ 8 6 2
♦ Q 5 4 3
♣ 8 7 5 3 |
| South |
♠ 3
♥ K Q 10 5
♦ K J 10 8 7 6
♣ Q 10 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1♠ |
Pass |
| 2♦ |
Pass |
2♠ |
Pass |
| 2 NT |
All pass |
|
|
Your call!
In this auction your partner's double should simply be high cards and not a penalty double. So you can describe your hand simply enough by bidding four hearts now. (For the record with a trump stack but moderate values his best bet is to pass and hope you can reopen with a double, or to gamble out three no-trumps if he is too strong to risk passing out the hand in three spades.)
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 3
♥ K Q 10 5
♦ K J 10 8 7 6
♣ Q 10 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
2♠ |
| 3♦ |
3♠ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
December 24th, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Wednesday, December 10th, 2014
I wish you would read a little poetry sometimes. Your ignorance cramps my conversation.
Anthony Hope
| West |
North |
| North-South |
♠ A K J 9
♥ A Q J 6 4
♦ K 10 5
♣ 7 |
| West |
East |
♠ —
♥ K 10 9 3
♦ A Q J 8
♣ K J 10 5 4 |
♠ 10 6 4 2
♥ 8 5 2
♦ 9 6 4 3
♣ 9 6 |
| South |
♠ Q 8 7 5 3
♥ 7
♦ 7 2
♣ A Q 8 3 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
1♦ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| 2♠ |
Pass |
4 NT |
Pass |
| 5♦ |
Pass |
6♠ |
All pass |
♦A
Your partner's double shows extras, typically with something like a doubleton spade and three hearts. It feels right to me to give preference to three diamonds rather than rebidding at no-trump or spades. Your hand may offer heart ruffs if they don't lead trumps, and maybe spades or clubs will ruff out if they do. Would a call of three clubs be natural and non-forcing here? I'm not sure!
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 8 7 5 3
♥ 7
♦ 7 2
♣ A Q 8 3 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| Pass |
1♣ |
1♦ |
1♥ |
| 1♠ |
2♥ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
December 23rd, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
A vein of poetry exists in the hearts of all men.
Thomas Carlyle
| West |
North |
| Both |
♠ Q 7 6 2
♥ Q J 2
♦ K 8 5 3 2
♣ Q |
| West |
East |
♠ A 9 3
♥ K 10 8
♦ J
♣ A J 10 7 5 3 |
♠ 10 8 5 4
♥ 7 6 5 4
♦ Q 10 7
♣ 8 4 |
| South |
♠ K J
♥ A 9 3
♦ A 9 6 4
♣ K 9 6 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
1♣ |
1♦ |
Pass |
| 3 NT |
All pass |
|
|
♣J
You really don't know where to go on this hand; one possibility is to rebid two no-trumps, but it might be a better spot played from your partner's hand (if he has the spade queen for example). Since you cannot raise either red suit, and rebidding clubs seems unnecessary, maybe you should bid two spades, as the fourth suit, to get partner involved in the decision of whether to play no-trump.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A 9 3
♥ K 10 8
♦ J
♣ A J 10 7 5 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♣ |
Pass |
1♦ |
Pass |
| 2♣ |
Pass |
2♥ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
December 22nd, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 17 Comments
It is good to be out on the road, and going one knows not where, Going through meadow and village, one knows not whither or why.
John Masefield
| South |
North |
| Both |
♠ Q J 2
♥ J 10 4 3 2
♦ K 5
♣ 10 5 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ 10 9 8 3
♥ 9 6 5
♦ J 9
♣ K J 7 3 |
♠ K 6 4
♥ Q 8 7
♦ 10 8 7 4 3
♣ Q 6 |
| South |
♠ A 7 5
♥ A K
♦ A Q 6 2
♣ A 9 8 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 2 NT |
Pass |
3♦* |
Pass |
| 3♥ |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
*Transfer to hearts
♠10
One normally tries to lead trumps against an auction of this sort. But here your partner rates to be overruffing dummy, and leading hearts might restrict his opportunity to do that. It feels right to lead clubs rather than diamonds, though it wouldn't surprise me if a diamond worked better.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ A J 5 3
♥ 10 8 7
♦ J 2
♣ 10 8 6 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| Pass |
1♦ |
Pass |
1♠ |
| Pass |
1 NT |
Pass |
2♥ |
| All pass |
|
|
|
December 21st, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
|
Could you clarify for me what sort of values you would need to back into the following 'live' auction. Say you pass over a one club opening bid, but then after LHO bids one spade, and RHO raises to two spades, you step in with a double. Does this show a good hand or just balancing values? And is it take-out for the two unbid suits, or a three-suited hand short in spades?
Re-entry Permit, Fredericksburg, Va.
This sort of sequence provokes much discussion. Since your LHO could be about to jump to four spades, I think you need a good hand to come in here. So a three-suiter with full opening values is most likely, since two no-trump might show the unbid suits. In balancing seat, of course, I'd expect this double to be two-suited, and not necessarily a good hand.
Can you discuss the technical merits in a reasonable standard pair game of the third-seat opening of one spade as opposed to one club with: ♠ A-Q-3-2, ♥ Q-5-3, ♦ K-10, ♣ J-9-4-2? How important is vulnerability in the equation?
Planning Ahead, Albuquerque, N.M.
In third seat the logic of opening a lead-directing major suit on hands where you intend to pass the response, whatever it is, does make sense. Here you are not ashamed of opening one club and rebidding one spade or one no-trump, while the spades are not quite good enough to look forward to a lead from shortage – or a raise on three. Change the spades spots to include the 10 and you'd persuade me.
I've read many snooty comments about ace-asking gadgets, specifically about Gerber, though many experts seem to favor cuebidding over Blackwood. Where do you stand?
Bashful Basher, Levittown, Pa.
|
Two points: cuebidding requires judgment, Blackwood requires the ability to count up to (or down from) four, and even keycard Blackwood only involves five keycards and the trump queen. That said, don't ever use Blackwood or Gerber if you can calculate that you won't know what to do over a normal response. I'm not as concerned as some about asking for aces with two losers in a side-suit; the opponents don't always cash them…
In first chair with ♠ A-9-7-2, ♥ 7, ♦ A-Q-10-5-2, ♣ K-Q-4 I opened one diamond, and heard my partner respond one spade. Without intervention this feels like a simple bid of three spades. But in fact I heard my RHO skip to three hearts. Was I right to bid three spades now, or should I have done more?
Competing Forces, Edmonton, Alberta
As you correctly imply, a three spade bid in competition might be distinctly shaded by comparison one in an uncontested auction. That might persuade you to jump to four spades now, since your partner could reasonably assume that you would compete to three spades with a balanced minimum opener with four spades. Clearly you do have a much better hand than that.
I believe you are not the world's biggest fan of playing inverted minors — and if so how forcing should they be, to game, or for one round?
Raising Arizona, Corpus Christi, Texas
I'm not opposed to playing inverted minors although I'm not their greatest fan, and do not play them in competition. I think at teams one should play the raise as forcing to three of the minor, but at pairs if opener or responder rebids two no-trump or three of the agreed minor after the Inverted Minor, I play this can be passed.
|
|
The East hand might be too good for a strong no-trump, but when you decide to open one, North-South compete aggressively over it to four spades, trying to put you under the maximum pressure at favorable vulnerability. Your double closes the auction; plan the defense on the lead of the club queen.
It may look appealing to overtake partner’s club queen and switch to a diamond, but there can surely be no hurry to do that. Your partner’s take-out double of three spades makes it clear that the hearts are not a serious source of tricks from declarer’s perspective, so you should focus your attention on preventing declarer from utilizing dummy’s other assets, namely the third trump.
The defense to keep all your options open is to overtake the club at trick one, winning the king to make the position plain to your partner. You should then switch to a low trump. If declarer plays a second club, the earlier play should make it plain to you to go up with the king of clubs, and play ace and another trump.
Declarer’s best move, incidentally, is to win your first trump play in dummy and advance the heart jack, which you must cover. He can win the third round of trumps in dummy and exit with a club, but you will win this and shift to the diamond nine. Your partner should duck declarer’s king, and later collect two diamonds tricks, for down 500.