February 24th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 7 Comments
Sometimes we focus so much on what we don't have that we fail to see, appreciate, and use what we do have!
Jeff Dixon
| South |
North |
| Neither |
♠ J 7 5 4
♥ K 4 3 2
♦ K
♣ J 7 3 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ A K Q 9 8 3
♥ A 9 5
♦ 4 3
♣ 9 5 |
♠ 10 2
♥ 10 7 6
♦ Q 10 8 5
♣ K 10 8 4 |
| South |
♠ 6
♥ Q J 8
♦ A J 9 7 6 2
♣ A Q 6 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♦ |
1♠ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| 2♦ |
2♠ |
Pass |
Pass |
| Dbl. |
Pass |
2 NT |
Pass |
| 3♣ |
All pass |
|
|
♠K
There is no single best treatment after opener's reverse, but I recommend that raising either of opener's suits is game-forcing. A rebid of your own suit (two hearts here) shows at least five cards and is a one-round force. The cheaper of fourth-suit and two no-trumps is an artificial negative, the other call being forcing. So here preference to three clubs is natural and forcing; perfect!
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ J 7 5 4
♥ K 4 3 2
♦ K
♣ J 7 3 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| Pass |
Pass |
1♣ |
Pass |
| 1♥ |
Pass |
2♦ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
February 23rd, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
Suspicion is the company of mean souls, and the bane of all good society.
Thomas Paine
| South |
North |
| Neither |
♠ A Q 2
♥ A K 10 9
♦ A J 5
♣ Q 6 5 |
| West |
East |
♠ J 8 7 4 3
♥ 7 3
♦ K Q 8
♣ A 7 3 |
♠ 6
♥ Q 6 5 4
♦ 9 7 3 2
♣ K 8 4 2 |
| South |
♠ K 10 9 5
♥ J 8 2
♦ 10 6 4
♣ J 10 9 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| Pass |
1♠ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
♦Q
All four suits look like they will or may cost a trick. My best guess would be that a diamond is least likely to be expensive; partner may have no honors in the suit or you may not do anything for declarer that he could not do himself. I'd lead the four – your partner will have a shrewd idea you won't be leading from a vulnerable honor, and once in a while the eight may be too valuable to waste.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ J 9 2
♥ J 6 3 2
♦ 10 8 4
♣ J 8 6 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
Pass |
2 NT |
| Pass |
6 NT |
All pass |
|
February 22nd, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 10 Comments
|
Can you define what is meant by a responsive double? Do they only apply after opening bids are doubled, or do they apply after overcalls?
Granny Smith, Rockford, Ill.
Since you asked a technical question, I'll define the terms precisely. A responsive double applies only after an opening bid is doubled and that suit is raised. Fourth hand's double suggests both majors if a minor is raised, and it suggests hearts if spades have been raised. But it denies spades if hearts have been raised, since you would bid them if you had them. After the opponents raise a suit around an overcall, double is takeout, just not technically a responsive double. Call it fourth suit or competitive.
What would you bid when you hear one club to your left, passed round to you, and you hold: ♠ A-Q-3-2, ♥ Q-5-3, ♦ K-10, ♣ J-9-4-2?
Keeping Mum, Troy, N.Y.
I would balance with a call of one no-trump, despite the possibility that my LHO is very strong, or that we are rescuing the opponents from an embarrassing spot. More often, either we or they could make a contract here – and sometimes both sides might make their contracts, or you can make game. The range for a balancing one no-trump is 11-14 here.
My partner and I are trying to establish what is the best way to continue after our weak-two gets doubled for take-out. We have heard of a convention called McCabe, but what does a redouble mean, and should new suits be rescues, promise a fit, or be lead-directing?
Having a Fit, Peru, Ind.
After your partner's weak-two is doubled – so that you do not rate to be on lead — redouble is strong, new suits to play at the two level, but are lead-directing at the three-level with at least a partial fit. Raises remain preemptive, while jumps show real suits plus a fit for partner. That lets a call of two no-trumps transfer to three clubs. This lets you get out in your own suit, or invite in partner's suit if followed by supporting partner. Incidentally, I suggest that after your partner opens or overcalls with a preempt, new suits by you should also be fit and lead-directing. Don't rescue yourself till they double for penalty.
|
You recently ran a hand where you held: ♠ 6-5-2, ♥ 7-5-4-2, ♦ A-10, ♣ K-J-7-6. You heard one diamond to your left, doubled by your partner. What I would need, in addition to my eight points and the diamond doubleton, to bid two hearts, rather than one? Does the fact that I am a passed hand have any bearing, or do I still need 10 points or so?
Gail Warning, Saint John, New Brunswick
A two heart response to the double is a real invitation – so using this hand as a template I'd jump with two hearts with the same hand but hearts such as J10xx or better. Use a nine-count with either a five-card suit or chunky intermediates or a second suit as a typical sound minimum.
What guidelines do you suggest for when you should use Stayman in response to a one no-trump or two no-trump opening? What if you have a four-card major and the values for game but a fully balanced hands?
Goal Tender, Palm Springs, Calif.
When you have a balanced hand, especially in a 4-3-3-3 pattern, with surplus values for game and a poor four-card major, consider playing no-trumps not a suit. The tipping point may be if you have soft values (typically the minor honors) in your short suits. The logic for this is that your hand may offer no ruffing values, since your queens and jacks may solidify partner's holding.
|
February 21st, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 16 Comments
Half the failures in life arise from pulling in one's horse as he is leaping.
Julius and Augustus Hare
| South |
North |
| North-South |
♠ J 5 3 2
♥ Q 7 4
♦ 10 8 6
♣ K J 9 |
| West |
East |
♠ K 9 4
♥ 10 6 3
♦ Q J 9
♣ 8 5 4 2 |
♠ A Q 7 6
♥ 5 2
♦ A 4 3 2
♣ 10 7 6 |
| South |
♠ 10 8
♥ A K J 9 8
♦ K 7 5
♣ A Q 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♥ |
Pass |
1♠ |
Pass |
| 2 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
♦Q
The auction has timed out perfectly for you. You can double one spade for take-out, showing extra values with a real heart suit and a hand that is at least playable in clubs. You were right not to double at your first turn, by the way, since if the opponents had bid spades you might have found it hard to get your hearts in conveniently.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 10 8
♥ A K J 9 8
♦ K 7 5
♣ A Q 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
1♦ |
| 1♥ |
Pass |
Pass |
1♠ |
| ? |
|
|
|
February 20th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 7 Comments
It's the little details that are vital. Little things make big things happen.
John Wooden
| South |
North |
| North-South |
♠ 4 2
♥ J 10 6
♦ Q 10 9 8 4
♣ 8 7 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ K Q J 7
♥ 5 3 2
♦ K 3 2
♣ 10 9 4 |
♠ 10 8 6 5 3
♥ 9
♦ J 7 6 5
♣ Q J 6 |
| South |
♠ A 9
♥ A K Q 8 7 4
♦ A
♣ A K 5 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 2♣ |
Pass |
2♦ |
Pass |
| 2♥ |
Pass |
4♥ |
Pass |
| 6♥ |
All pass |
|
|
♠K
Your minor-suit values aren't likely to be pulling their full weight, but your partner has shown a really strong hand and your additional shape entitles you to bid game here – with one important caveat. The better your partner, the more likely he is to have what he has shown. With a weak player, I might pass and apologize later.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 10 8 6 5 3
♥ 9
♦ J 7 6 5
♣ Q J 6 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| Pass |
1♦ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| 1♠ |
2♣ |
3♠ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
February 19th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 13 Comments
If all the good people were clever, And all clever people were good, The world would be nicer than ever We thought that it possibly could.
Elizabeth Wordsworth
| North |
North |
| North-South |
♠ A 10 7 6 2
♥ K J 9 3
♦ 7
♣ K J 6 |
| West |
East |
♠ 3
♥ 10
♦ K Q 8 5 4
♣ A Q 10 9 5 4 |
♠ K Q J 4
♥ 2
♦ J 10 9 6
♣ 8 7 3 2 |
| South |
♠ 9 8 5
♥ A Q 8 7 6 5 4
♦ A 3 2
♣ — |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1♠ |
Pass |
| 3♥ |
4♣ |
4 NT |
Pass |
| 5♥ |
Pass |
6♥ |
Pass |
| Pass |
Dbl. |
Pass |
Pass |
| Rdbl. |
All pass |
|
|
♠3
Your partner's cuebid asks you to bid no-trump with a club stopper and you are more than generously provided for in that department. If your partner is coming in either spades or hearts he can raise you at your next turn, but for the time being the no-trump game looks the most likely to make.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A 10 7 6 2
♥ K J 9 3
♦ 7
♣ K J 6 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1♦ |
Pass |
| 1♠ |
2♣ |
2♦ |
Pass |
| 2♥ |
Pass |
3♣ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
February 18th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
Think what our Nation stands for, Books from Boots’ and country lanes, Free speech, free passes, class distinction, Democracy and proper drains.
John Betjeman
| South |
North |
| East-West |
♠ J 5
♥ Q 6 5
♦ 10 7 5 2
♣ K 8 4 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ —
♥ K 9 7 4 3
♦ K 9 3
♣ Q J 10 7 6 |
♠ Q 9 8 3
♥ 10 8 2
♦ Q 6 4
♣ 9 5 2 |
| South |
♠ A K 10 7 6 4 2
♥ A J
♦ A J 8
♣ A |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 2♣ |
Pass |
2♦ |
Pass |
| 2♠ |
Pass |
2 NT |
Pass |
| 3♠ |
Pass |
4♠ |
All pass |
♣Q
In third seat I can see the logic of opening one heart, or even preempting to two hearts. It does feel right to bid though. Yes, you have only a nine-count but quite a lot of offense, and no reason to assume your side cannot get into the auction and make your opponents' life more difficult.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ —
♥ K 9 7 4 3
♦ K 9 3
♣ Q J 10 7 6 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
Pass |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
February 17th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 10 Comments
It is necessary to relax your muscles when you can. Relaxing your brain is fatal.
Stirling Moss
| South |
North |
| Both |
♠ 8 4 2
♥ 10 3
♦ K 10 4 2
♣ K 6 4 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ 6 5
♥ A 9 8 6 5 2
♦ 5
♣ J 10 8 7 |
♠ Q J 10 9 7 3
♥ K J
♦ J 9 7 6
♣ 9 |
| South |
♠ A K
♥ Q 7 4
♦ A Q 8 3
♣ A Q 5 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 2 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
♥6
The hand is absolutely maximum for a jump to two no-trumps here, which is not unusual but shows a balanced 19-21 in protective seat. With only a doubleton spade, it feels right to make this call rather than double, since spades are not really on the agenda from your perspective.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A K
♥ Q 7 4
♦ A Q 8 3
♣ A Q 5 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
1♥ |
Pass |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
February 16th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 2 Comments
Nothing can stop you moving forward, unless you yourself surrender under pressure.
Anil Sinha
| South |
North |
| Both |
♠ 9 6
♥ 10 8 3
♦ A 5 3
♣ A J 8 6 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ J 8 5 4 2
♥ Q 9 2
♦ J 8 4
♣ 7 5 |
♠ A Q 3
♥ 7 6 5 4
♦ 9 7 6 2
♣ K 4 |
| South |
♠ K 10 7
♥ A K J
♦ K Q 10
♣ Q 10 9 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♣ |
Pass |
2♣ |
Pass |
| 3 NT |
All pass |
|
|
♠4
Your approach might vary depending on whether you are playing pairs or teams. At pairs you might go for the most passive option, the top of your doubleton heart. At teams I'd guess a spade lead might be the lead most likely to set the game. Of course leading from either four-card suit might work, but neither suit is attractive on this auction.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ K 5 3
♥ 8 7
♦ Q 7 4 3
♣ J 9 5 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
2 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
| All pass |
|
|
|
February 15th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 11 Comments
|
Holding: ♠ 7-6-2, ♥ A-6, ♦ A-9-8-5-4-2, ♣ K-9, what is your response after partner, dealer, opens one spade, and your RHO doubles? Do you raise partner, bid your suit, or redouble to show strength — or does the redouble show tolerance for spades? Also, what bid would you recommend without the intervening takeout double?
Double Trouble, Charlottesville, Va.
Without a double the least lie here would be to bid two diamonds — even if you play it as forcing to game. All those aces and kings look like an opening bid, don't they? Over a double, redouble shows 10+ and tends to be made on hands without spade support. Two diamonds should be played as natural and non-forcing, unlike a one-level response after a double, which should be a one-round force by an unpassed hand. Since a spade raise would be a distortion, the redouble wins hands down, to be followed by a spade raise.
Is partner obliged to accept a Jacoby Transfer or can he bid something else and if so must this be alerted?
Quatre Saisons, Montreal
Having methods where some other call than completing the transfer is allowed is a good idea. Any transfer-break must be alerted if it has an agreed meaning. Simplest is to break to three of your major with four trumps and a non-minimum. Bidding a new suit will happen very rarely; but simplest is to play such bids as a doubleton ace or king with a big fit. A more complex answer is to add a break to two no-trumps as three good trumps and a maximum.
Is it ever acceptable to overcall into a four-card suit? Would you pass, overcall, or double, when your RHO opens one diamond and you have: ♠ K-Q-10-7, ♥ K, ♦ A-J-5, ♣ K-10-7-5-3?
Logophile, Janesville, Wis.
Double looks wrong with a singleton major and these values, while passing feels cowardly. That leaves an overcall of one no-trump, two clubs or one spade. I marginally prefer bidding the good four-card major to introducing a weak club suit, although I could live with either action. One no-trump with a bare ace, rather than the king might be possible?
|
In fourth seat you hold: ♠ A-K-Q-3, ♥ 10, ♦ A, ♣ A-K-Q-J-7-3-2. Peacefully minding your own business, you hear a weak two diamonds to your left and a theoretically forcing response of two hearts to your right. I just blasted into six clubs, but alas, our opponents took the save in six hearts, for just 300. At the other table our teammates took the save in seven hearts over the making six spades for -500. How would you bid this hand?
Monster Mash, Houston, Texas
A double of two hearts is one of those areas even well-established partnerships don't agree on, so three diamonds may be a safer cuebid, planning to bid six clubs next, then maybe six spades over six hearts next time. This is a gamble, I admit, but not an unreasonable one. I hate to defend lower than seven hearts with this hand.
Playing strong twos, our general agreement is that we open two clubs with four or fewer losers. But we have had strong disagreement as to whether or not that should be a one-suiter, since my partner insists on doing it with a two-suiter, even if her best suit is my artificial diamond response. Is there a best theoretical approach?
Powerhouse Pat, Grand Forks, N.D.
The problem with opening two clubs when you hold long diamonds is that the action gets too high too fast. I say open one diamond with marginal hands, but another possible fix after the two-club opener is as follows. Use a jump to three of a major over the two diamond negative as four in that major and five or more diamonds, unbalanced. Thus a rebid of three diamonds is one-suited in principle.
|
|
All the deals this week comes from last year's NEC tournament in Yokohama. In three clubs Willie Whittaker received repeated spade leads, and ruffed, then unblocked the diamond king and led a heart to the queen and ace. Back came a heart, after which declarer can succeed by cashing his winners, taking a trump finesse, then ruffing two diamonds in dummy to score the ace-queen of clubs and four red-suit winners, plus three ruffs. Instead Whittaker played to ruff a diamond before cashing the second heart trick and that let West get a heart away. Better defense for West would have been to lead the third top spade when in with the heart ace, which promotes an additional trump winner and ensures the defeat of the contract.
In the other room the contract of three diamonds looked more playable; but again, if the defenders play three top spades early on, it may let East discard a heart loser.
In fact, though, after a top spade lead West shifted to trumps. Declarer voluntarily ruffed a spade to hand, and that let West subsequently play a third spade without setting up dummy’s jack. Declarer subsequently misjudged the play to go down two.
By contrast, when Ashley Bach for team Lorentz played three diamonds, he ruffed the spade at trick two and led the heart queen to the ace. He won the trump return, crossed to the heart jack and played three rounds of trumps. East could take two trump tricks but then had to lead a heart or club, allowing declarer to test both suits, and come home with nine tricks.