January 25th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 8 Comments
|
When one plays Drury is there not the risk of losing the club suit as a passed hand? If so, how does one combat that?
Passed Over, Sioux Falls, S.D.
Drury (in which the passed hand response of two clubs to a major-suit opening, showing a maximum pass, and a fit) keeps you low on occasions, and lets you explore for the right game efficiently. You minimize the risk you describe if you stretch to open one club with 11 points and six clubs in first or second chair. With fewer points, pass, then respond one no-trump (or three clubs to show real clubs and no major-suit fit, if necessary).
I know this sounds like a very basic question, but to preempt do I open two or three? I realize that to preempt in clubs I would have to say three, but for the other suits is a preempt bid at the two- or three-level?
Learning Fast, San Antonio, Texas
Please do not apologize for asking questions. The game is hard enough, and if you cannot learn by asking, it is even harder. Both calls are preempts, showing less than opening values; two-level bids show six, three-level bids show seven-card suits.
I never know what to do when partner opens and I have a four-card major with a five-card minor, and 10 points or more. Holding ♠ K-10-4-3, ♥ J-5, ♦ K-6, ♣ A-10-6-4-3, what should I bid in response to an opening bid of one diamond or one heart?
Humble Pie, Madison, Wis.
With four spades and a five-card minor, one tends to bid the major if the hand is not worth a force to game. On stronger hands, as here, bid two clubs then two spades, and plan to force to game. However, if you would be happy to play a 4-3 spade fit (on the example hand shift the club ace into the spades) so that you had a chunky four-card suit, and a weak five-carder in clubs, then you can sensibly respond one spade.
|
I always read your column daily, but occasionally, like today, I am at a loss to understand the bidding. How in the world can authors keep any credibility by writing a book for beginners and say it is acceptable to jump raise your partner in a major with only nine high cards points? Your question was "After reviewing dummy, what should your plan be?" the plan is obvious. Get a new partner!
Fifth Beatle, Seneca, S.C.
Not all nine-counts are created equal, and while with scattered values and four trumps I'd raise a major to two, the hand in question in the article had soft working trump honors, and a useful four-card side-suit. It was ♠ Q-J-4-2 ♥ A-Q-6-3 ♦ 10-4-2 ♣ 4-3 and was surely not a million miles from a limit raise. And would holding an additional value such as the club jack really make a real difference to you?
Did you watch the junior bridge tournament in Istanbul this summer, live or online? And if so what was your impression of the standard of bridge played?
Keen Spectator, Phoenix, Ariz.
I did watch some of the bridge online at Bridge Base, and I was especially impressed by the under-21 players from Sweden and the USA who played with maturity well beyond their years. I expect to see many of them in Open World Championships, sooner rather than later.
|
January 24th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
Man is the only kind of varmint that sets his own trap, baits it, and falls into it.
John Steinbeck
| South |
North |
| East-West |
♠ 8 4 3
♥ K J 7 6 4 3
♦ K 2
♣ A 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ K Q 6 2
♥ —
♦ Q J 8 5
♣ Q J 10 7 3 |
♠ 9 7 5
♥ 9
♦ A 10 7 6 4
♣ 9 6 5 2 |
| South |
♠ A J 10
♥ A Q 10 8 5 2
♦ 9 3
♣ K 8 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♥ |
Dbl. |
4♥ |
All pass |
♣Q
Having rebid hearts (which suggests five good ones or a six-card suit) you do not need to re-emphasize that suit. The choice is to rebid two no-trump to show the diamond stopper, or to give preference to clubs on a doubleton. Though this sequence would, traditionally promise three trumps. I prefer to give preference now rather than later. We can always get back to no-trump if partner simply needs a single stopper.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 8 4 3
♥ K J 7 6 4 3
♦ K 2
♣ A 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♥ |
Pass |
2♣ |
Pass |
| 2♥ |
Pass |
2♠ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
January 23rd, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 13 Comments
We never do anything well till we cease to think about the manner of doing it.
William Hazlitt
| South |
North |
| Both |
♠ 9 6 4 2
♥ Q 7 6
♦ 9 3 2
♣ 8 6 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ 10 7
♥ 9 8 4
♦ 8 6 5
♣ K Q J 9 2 |
♠ K 8 5 3
♥ 10 5 3 2
♦ A K 4
♣ 7 5 |
| South |
♠ A Q J
♥ A K J
♦ Q J 10 7
♣ A 10 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 2♣ |
Pass |
2♦ |
Pass |
| 2 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
♣K
To bid a major here requires either five cards or a four-card suit where you would not be unhappy to be raised with three. Neither of your majors meets that criterion so settle for a simple raise to two diamonds – in my opinion a cuebid raise should either have a fourth trump or should be a little better put together than this hand. It never hurts to have a maximum for your bidding once in a while.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K 8 5 3
♥ 10 5 3 2
♦ A K 4
♣ 7 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
1♣ |
1♦ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
January 22nd, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 2 Comments
A brain of feathers, and a heart of lead.
Alexander Pope
| West |
North |
| East-West |
♠ Q 10
♥ K J 10 6
♦ Q J
♣ Q J 7 6 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ A K J 9 2
♥ 9 5
♦ K 7 4 2
♣ A 5 |
♠ 8 7 6 4
♥ 3 2
♦ 10 6 3
♣ 10 9 8 2 |
| South |
♠ 5 3
♥ A Q 8 7 4
♦ A 9 8 5
♣ K 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
1♠ |
Pass |
Pass |
| 2♥ |
Pass |
2♠ |
Pass |
| 3♦ |
Pass |
4♥ |
All pass |
♠K
It is normal to reopen with a double when you are short in the opponents' suit, in case partner was lurking with a penalty double. Here, though, your clubs seem too good for that to be possible and your hearts are too weak to welcome a response in that suit. So simply bid two diamonds now – with passing a viable if pessimistic alternative, in case the opponents have missed the boat in hearts.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A K J 9 2
♥ 9 5
♦ K 7 4 2
♣ A 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♠ |
2♣ |
Pass |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
January 21st, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 8 Comments
Nobody is smarter than you are. And what if they are? What good is their understanding doing you?
Terence McKenna
| North |
North |
| North-South |
♠ K 3 2
♥ 7 3
♦ A 4
♣ A K Q 10 8 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ 10 9 8 5 4
♥ A J 10
♦ J 10 8 2
♣ 7 |
♠ J
♥ Q 9 8 6 5
♦ Q 9 5
♣ 9 6 3 2 |
| South |
♠ A Q 7 6
♥ K 4 2
♦ K 7 6 3
♣ J 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1♣ |
Pass |
| 1♦ |
Pass |
3♣ |
Pass |
| 4♣ |
Pass |
4♦ |
Pass |
| 4 NT |
Pass |
5♦ |
Pass |
| 6 NT |
All pass |
|
|
♠10
Your partner's double here suggests a balanced hand – and indicates the possibility of defending if you have the appropriate hand. Passing would be a reasonable gamble here but you seem to have too much in spades and not enough aces to want to defend. Accordingly, a retreat to three spades seems wise.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A Q 7 6
♥ K 4 2
♦ K 7 6 3
♣ J 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
Pass |
| 1♦ |
Pass |
1♠ |
2♣ |
| 2♠ |
3♣ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
January 20th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 3 Comments
No man can lose what he never had.
Izaak Walton
| North |
North |
| East-West |
♠ A K
♥ J 4 3
♦ Q 6 5
♣ Q J 10 9 7 |
| West |
East |
♠ J 9 7 3 2
♥ 10 7 5
♦ 3 2
♣ K 6 2 |
♠ 10 5 4
♥ A Q 9 8
♦ 10 9 8 7 4
♣ A |
| South |
♠ Q 8 6
♥ K 6 2
♦ A K J
♣ 8 5 4 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1♣ |
Pass |
| 3 NT |
All pass |
|
|
♠3
Just as in today's deal you were all set to jump to three no-trumps, but the opposition intervention allows you to cuebid two hearts, and maybe reach the no-trump game from partner's hand. That would be a good idea any time partner had a positional heart stopper (such as queen doubleton or queen-third).
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 8 6
♥ K 6 2
♦ A K J
♣ 8 5 4 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
Pass |
1♣ |
1♥ |
| ? |
|
|
|
January 19th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 7 Comments
To dry one's eyes and laugh at a fall, And, baffled, get up and begin again.
Robert Browning
| South |
North |
| East-West |
♠ Q 10 4
♥ K 7 2
♦ J 10 9 5
♣ Q 8 7 |
| West |
East |
♠ 9 8 6 3
♥ A Q J 10 9
♦ A 6
♣ 5 4 |
♠ 5
♥ 8 5 4 3
♦ 8 7 4 3 2
♣ A 9 6 |
| South |
♠ A K J 7 2
♥ 6
♦ K Q
♣ K J 10 3 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♠ |
2♥ |
2♠ |
3♥ |
| 4♠ |
All pass |
|
|
♥A
You might look for an alternative to leading a doubleton honor into a hand that has promised at least one heart guard. But here any choice looks just as dangerous, and the one thing you know about a heart lead is that you are planning to set up a long suit, to which partner will have an entry. So lead the heart jack.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ J 7 2
♥ J 4
♦ Q 7 5 2
♣ 8 5 4 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1♥ |
1 NT |
| All pass |
|
|
|
January 18th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 8 Comments
|
What is your opinion on opening two no-trump with a weak doubleton, or with a five-card major, or indeed with both? I recently picked up ♠ A-Q-10-7-3, ♥ 9-5, ♦ A-Q-5, ♣ A-K-J, and elected to open one spade. My partner disagreed with my perception of the hand's flaws for an opening of two no-trump. What do you think?
Looking Lively, Pleasanton, Calif.
You should appreciate that all the alternatives to opening two no-trump are far more seriously flawed. You misstate the hand's strength by opening one spade — and also leave yourself without any sensible rebids no matter what partner does. Open two no-trump and settle for imperfection. The best is the enemy of the good.
Do you favor an ace or king opening lead from length holding including both cards, and what is your rationale for the choice?
Robber Baron, Atlanta, Ga.
The king from ace-king for me. The only real problem holding opposite an ambiguous king lead is something like jack-third (and this really only presents a problem with dummy holding neither the queen nor ace, and 3-plus cards. In other words, you generally know when to signal attitude and when not. Additionally, this method lets an ace lead deny the king.
How much do you need to make a free bid in response to a take-out double? In second seat after hearing the auction start one diamond – pass — one no-trump double – two clubs, should I bid two spades holding: ♠ J-9-7-3, ♥ 7-5, ♦ 10-8-6-5, ♣ A-7-4, or is passing more discreet?
Entry-Level, Great Falls, Mont.
This hand is on the cusp for acting. I probably would stretch to bid, buoyed by the fact that my failure to act initially or cuebid two diamonds now limits my hand a little. But make my side-suit shape flatter and I could be persuaded to pass, especially if the vulnerability was against me.
|
Holding: ♠ 10-8-6-5, ♥ K-2, ♦ Q-9-8-6-3 ♣ A 4 I heard my partner open one diamond, and my RHO overcall one heart. I thought all three of the choices of raising diamonds to the two- or three-level, doubling, or bidding one no-trump had merit. What do you say?
Spoiled for Choice, Boise, Idaho
When you hold support for partner's minor and four cards in the other major you will normally double first, then support partner. Bidding one spade shows five here, of course. One no-trump looks wrong with only one heart stop, and if you raise diamonds you may never find spades. By the way, remember that a jump raise of diamonds in competition is frequently played these days as preemptive rather than invitational.
I wonder if you could tell me what criteria one should use as to whether to pass or open (and if the latter, at what level) a hand like: ♠ Q-10-6-5-4-3, ♥ A-J, ♦ Q-J-5, ♣ J-3. How do position and vulnerability – or even the form of scoring – affect this question?
Careful Does It, Montgomery, Ala.
Almost any 11-count without a vulnerable singleton honor is a one-level opening for me. Change the diamond five into a small club and I might open two spades in second seat. The most important piece of advice I can give is always to open when you have a good suit. No hand with a good suit falls between a weak-two and one-level opening bid. You can pass a hand with a bad suit, of course. This applies at any form of scoring. In second seat be more disciplined than in first and surely in third seat.
|
January 17th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 8 Comments
Vanity can easily overtake wisdom. It usually overtakes common sense.
Julian Casablancas
| East |
North |
| East-West |
♠ A 5
♥ A K 10 2
♦ 7 3
♣ A K J 9 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q 7
♥ J 8 5 4
♦ A K Q 2
♣ Q 10 5 |
♠ K J 9 8 6 4 3
♥ 7 3
♦ J 6 5
♣ 3 |
| South |
♠ 10 2
♥ Q 9 6
♦ 10 9 8 4
♣ 8 7 6 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
3♠ |
| Pass |
Pass |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| 4♣ |
Pass |
5♣ |
All pass |
♦K
There is a real temptation to raise to three hearts, but if you play New Minor Forcing (where a bid of two clubs is forcing and the way you start describing most invitational or game-forcing hands) then this sequence is weak and denies invitational values with both majors. North should have less than invitational values, and you should pass and hope to go plus.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 7
♥ J 8 5 4
♦ A K Q 2
♣ Q 10 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♦ |
Pass |
1♠ |
Pass |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
2♥ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
January 16th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Friday, January 2nd, 2015
We must change (our ideas) when they have served their purpose, as we change a blunt lancet that we have used long enough.
Claude Bernard
| West |
North |
| Both |
♠ 6 2
♥ Q 9 2
♦ 9 5 4 3
♣ A K J 10 |
| West |
East |
♠ A 4
♥ A K J 7 4 3
♦ Q 7 6
♣ Q 5 |
♠ 9 7 5 3
♥ 8
♦ 10 8 2
♣ 9 8 7 3 2 |
| South |
♠ K Q J 10 8
♥ 10 6 5
♦ A K J
♣ 6 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
1♥ |
Pass |
Pass |
| Dbl. |
2♥ |
Pass |
Pass |
| 2♠ |
Pass |
3♠ |
All pass |
♥K
The pessimistic options would be to pass two hearts, or give preference to two spades. This hand feels a little too good for those cautious actions. With three working cards for my partner, I would guess to raise to three hearts, as an invitation. Yes, I am a trump short, but I've done worse.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 6 2
♥ Q 9 2
♦ 9 5 4 3
♣ A K J 10 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1♠ |
Pass |
| 1 NT |
2♦ |
2♥ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
|
Gunnar Hallberg is not only one of the best players around, he is also a fine analyst, with a good eye for a deal. He sent me this apparently simple board from an online teams game, telling me that both his partner and his opponents could have done better. But now you are warned, you won't fall into the traps, will you?
At the table the contract of four hearts received a top club lead. Declarer won the ace and drew trumps, then stripped off the clubs, and led a diamond to the king and ace. Back came a spade to the jack and queen and West cashed his diamond winner then played a second spade; 10 tricks made.
The defensive error is easy to spot; had West underled his diamond queen, East would have won his 10 and played a second spade, for down one. But declarer’s slight slip is far harder to spot. He could surely have made the defenders’ life more difficult if he had given up on the overtrick after winning the club king at trick one. After taking out the trump and leading a club to the king, a low diamond from dummy would have made East’s life VERY hard. He needs to go in with the 10 to have any chance to set the hand. Be honest, would you have found the play?
I suppose one could argue that the play is unlikely to cost; but I’m not sure I would see the position coming unless I was very wide awake.