January 10th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
The man recovered of the bite, The dog it was that died.
Oliver Goldsmith
| North |
North |
| East-West |
♠ 5 2
♥ A K Q J 9
♦ Q J 6 3
♣ Q 10 |
| West |
East |
♠ A Q 8 7 3
♥ 8 6
♦ K 10 4
♣ 6 3 2 |
♠ J 10 9 6
♥ 10 7 4 3 2
♦ 7
♣ K 5 4 |
| South |
♠ K 4
♥ 5
♦ A 9 8 5 2
♣ A J 9 8 7 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1♥ |
Pass |
| 2♦ |
Pass |
3♦ |
Pass |
| 3 NT |
All pass |
|
|
♠7
Having shown your minor-suit pattern accurately, you should now bid three no-trump, to indicate you have a spade card. Let your partner look at his own hand and decide what to do next. You have painted him a nice picture of what you have.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K 4
♥ 5
♦ A 9 8 5 2
♣ A J 9 8 7 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♦ |
Pass |
1♥ |
Pass |
| 2♣ |
Pass |
2♠ |
Pass |
| 3♣ |
Pass |
3♦ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
January 9th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 7 Comments
Seek not to be good, but aim not to be great.
Lord Lyttelton
| East |
North |
| North-South |
♠ A J 2
♥ A J 8 3
♦ A K Q J 2
♣ 7 |
| West |
East |
♠ 10 7 5 3
♥ 7 5
♦ 10 5
♣ Q 8 6 4 2 |
♠ K Q 6
♥ K Q
♦ 6 3
♣ A K 10 9 5 3 |
| South |
♠ 9 8 4
♥ 10 9 6 4 2
♦ 9 8 7 4
♣ J |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
1♣ |
| Pass |
1♠ |
Dbl. |
2♥* |
| Pass |
3♣ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| 3♥ |
Pass |
4♥ |
All pass |
*Showing three spades, five or more clubs, and a good hand.
♠7
While there is no clear-cut agreement on what a redouble means, I think it simply shows extras and guarantees real clubs. For the record, a call of one no-trump would show 18-19 balanced. And while you might bid a second suit with 4-5 pattern and real extras, you can also start with a redouble and then bid on later. Here your redouble will tell your partner you have clubs and a strong hand.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K Q 6
♥ K Q
♦ 6 3
♣ A K 10 9 5 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♣ |
Pass |
Pass |
Dbl. |
| ? |
|
|
|
January 8th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 15 Comments
Christmas is over and Business is Business.
Franklin Pierce Adams
| South |
North |
| Neither |
♠ A 9 7
♥ 8 7
♦ A 6 4 3 2
♣ K 5 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ 8 6 5 4 3
♥ 9 2
♦ 9 5
♣ Q J 10 7 |
♠ K Q J
♥ Q J 10 6
♦ Q J 8 7
♣ 9 4 |
| South |
♠ 10 2
♥ A K 5 4 3
♦ K 10
♣ A 8 6 3 |
It is Xmas; your choice!
That depends…
Eli Culbertson might have argued that two aces and a king constituted an opening bid, especially when coupled with a five-card suit. I would probably look at the very poor spot-cards and decide that I could afford to pass this hand, but would not disagree strongly with someone taking the other approach. Give me the diamond 10-9, or a little more shape in the side-suits, and I'd change my mind.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A 9 7
♥ 8 7
♦ A 6 4 3 2
♣ K 5 2 |
January 7th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 3 Comments
Greedy with the property of others, extravagant with his own.
Sallust
| West |
North |
| Both |
♠ A 10 9 8 3
♥ 3 2
♦ 9 8 6 2
♣ Q 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ 6 2
♥ K 5
♦ 10 5
♣ K J 9 8 7 6 2 |
♠ J 7 5 4
♥ A 8 7 6
♦ 7 4 3
♣ 10 5 |
| South |
♠ K Q
♥ Q J 10 9 4
♦ A K Q J
♣ A 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
3♣ |
Pass |
Pass |
| Dbl. |
Pass |
3♠ |
Pass |
| 3 NT |
All pass |
|
|
♠6
Your partner's double followed by a cuebid shows real extras in high-cards. You have the perfect hand to jump to three spades, suggesting five spades and a little more in high cards than he might expect. Let him make the running from there. My second choice would be to bid four spades.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A 10 9 8 7
♥ 3 2
♦ 9 8 6 2
♣ Q 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| Pass |
1♦ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| 1♠ |
Pass |
2♦ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
January 6th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 12 Comments
But knowledge to their eyes her ample age Rich with the spoils of time did ne’er unroll.
Thomas Gray
| North |
North |
| East-West |
♠ A 10 6
♥ 9 7 4
♦ 8 7 6
♣ K Q 5 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ J 8 7 3
♥ J 6
♦ A J 9 5
♣ 10 8 7 |
♠ 2
♥ K Q 10 8 5 2
♦ K 10 4 2
♣ 6 3 |
| South |
♠ K Q 9 5 4
♥ A 3
♦ Q 3
♣ A J 9 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
Pass |
2♥ |
| 2♠ |
Pass |
3♠ |
Pass |
| 4♠ |
All pass |
|
|
♥J
It looks simple enough to raise to three clubs here – and no one could really argue with that. But if you consider, as I do, that you are top of the range for that action, you can bid two spades instead to show that you have a maximum club raise with a spade feature. The point is that your partner will then know how to evaluate his major-suit cards better.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A 10 6
♥ 9 7 4
♦ 8 7 6
♣ K Q 5 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
Pass |
1♦ |
Pass |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
2♣ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
January 5th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
Reading is to the mind what exercise is to the body.
Sir Richard Steele
| South |
North |
| None |
♠ Q 9 4
♥ K J 9
♦ K 7 6 3
♣ K 6 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ K 10 6
♥ 8 4
♦ Q J 10 9 4
♣ A 4 2 |
♠ 8 7 5 3
♥ 7 6 5 2
♦ 8 5
♣ Q 8 5 |
| South |
♠ A J 2
♥ A Q 10 3
♦ A 2
♣ J 10 9 7 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
♦Q
While I would never go so far as to say you should never lead your honor from a three-card suit in this position, I would say that the normal lead from your diamond holding is a small card. Imagine declarer with either AJ2 or KJ2 of diamonds to see why leading the queen is potentially such a bad idea.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ J 9 4
♥ J 7 3 2
♦ Q 7 5
♣ 10 5 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| Pass |
Pass |
1♦ |
1 NT |
| Pass |
2 NT |
All pass |
|
January 4th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Sunday, December 21st, 2014
|
As a general rule, where do you stand on when redoubles are for rescue after an overcall, and when they simply show good hands – or something else? For instance, after an overcall, would my partner's redouble of a negative or takeout double be for rescue? Or would it show a good hand? In the latter case, is support implied or denied?
Blue for Danger, Twin Falls, Idaho
Redouble by an unpassed hand should show close to opening values, and by a passed hand show decent values. Though such doubles may not be specifically directed towards penalties, all subsequent doubles by either player would be for blood. Redoubles should only be for rescue when someone has made a penalty double, or when there has been a penalty pass of a take-out double.
I am a rubber bridge player, and like to keep it simple. In response to a one club opening bid, I say, if you have a four card major, bid it. My partner had ♠ 7-5, ♥ K-Q-J-9, ♦ A-10-8-5-3, ♣ 3-2 and responded one diamond. I took that as probably weak with no four-card major so bid one no-trump and we missed a playable four heart contract. Where do you stand here?
Old Fashioned, Los Angeles, Calif.
I'm with you. With a one-bid hand, go for majors not minors first. And as opener I would rebid one no-trump over one diamond, in a 4-3-3-3 shape with either major, as you did. I believe a rebid in a major suggests at least four clubs, and if balanced, the hand will deliver decent suits. Playing that way lets partner give preference freely to two clubs.
Last week in our rubber game I responded one heart to one club with: ♠ 9-2, ♥ K-10-6-4, ♦ A-7-2, ♣ A-J-4-2 and after my partner's limit raise to three hearts I simply bid game. We made six hearts when my partner produced a singleton diamond and 16 points, and I was told I had not done enough. Can you comment?
Weak End, Milford, Pa.
|
There is no guarantee of a second fit on this hand (your partner might have only four clubs, or even a 3-4-3-3 18-count). However, your controls argue that you might eke out a four club cuebid in case partner can take control. One effort is more than enough, though. Let partner take it from there.
I do not find it easy to distinguish in a competitive auction between when a cuebid asks, and when it shows. Are there some simple rules I should know?
Socrates, Wilmington, N.C.
After your side opens the bidding, most cuebids below three no-trump are looking for stoppers in the suit bid by the opponents (if you had the suit under control, you would bid no-trump yourself.) But when they have bid or shown two suits, you bid the suit you have stopped. In just the same way, when your side has bid two suits, you show not ask in a third suit; but when you have bid three suits, you ask not tell in the fourth.
My partner and I play relatively disciplined take-out doubles of preempts, but can you comment on whether it is right to double a four-level preempt with a balanced hand? Or should you be more oriented to take-out, or indeed to penalties? And what are you supposed to do with a strong balanced hand over a preempt to four of a major?
Silent Speaker, Olympia, Wash.
Sometimes you may feel too strong to pass and collect a penalty in 50s against a game your way. Since partner will tend to pull either a double of four hearts or four spades with a lot of shape it will (rarely) be right to pass and try to go plus if the alternative is less palatable. I do play a call of four no-trump over four of a minor is natural, but two-suited over a major.
|
January 3rd, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Saturday, December 20th, 2014
Our discussion is on no trifling matter, but on the right way to conduct our lives.
Plato
| South |
North |
| Both |
♠ 3
♥ K 7 2
♦ A Q 10 9 2
♣ A K 8 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ A Q J 6 4
♥ J 9 8 5 3
♦ 5
♣ 9 4 |
♠ 10 9 7 2
♥ Q 6
♦ 7 3
♣ Q 10 7 6 5 |
| South |
♠ K 8 5
♥ A 10 4
♦ K J 8 6 4
♣ J 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♦ |
2♦* |
3♠** |
Pass |
| 3 NT |
Pass |
4♣ |
Pass |
| 4♥ |
Pass |
4 NT |
Pass |
| 5♥ |
Pass |
6♦ |
All pass |
*Majors
**Short spades, agreeing diamonds
♦5
This hand is closer to a two diamond overcall than some, but facing a passed hand I feel like I need more for a two diamond overcall than this. Give me the diamond 10 in place of the four, and you might tempt me into indiscretion. As it is, I pass.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K 8 5
♥ A 10 4
♦ K J 8 6 4
♣ J 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
Pass |
Pass |
1♠ |
| ? |
|
|
|
January 2nd, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
Everything is funny as long as it happens to someone else.
Will Rogers
| South |
North |
| Neither |
♠ K Q 5
♥ A 7 6 3
♦ 8 6
♣ A K Q 7 |
| West |
East |
♠ A 3 2
♥ 10 8 2
♦ Q J 10 7 5
♣ 8 5 |
♠ 4
♥ K J 9 4
♦ 9 4 3 2
♣ J 10 4 3 |
| South |
♠ J 10 9 8 7 6
♥ Q 5
♦ A K
♣ 9 6 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♠ |
Pass |
2♣ |
Pass |
| 2♠ |
Pass |
3♠ |
Pass |
| 4♠ |
Pass |
4 NT |
Pass |
| 5♦ |
Pass |
6♠ |
All pass |
♦Q
The choice here is to rebid two no-trump to show the nature of your hand, ignoring your small doubleton in a side-suit, or to reverse into two hearts, later pretending that you have a 3-4-1-5 pattern. Of the two, I believe that the first route will work better if your side belongs in game or higher, as you will get to show your majors along the way so long as partner has enough to act over your rebid.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K Q 5
♥ A 7 6 3
♦ 8 6
♣ A K Q 7 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♣ |
Pass |
1♠ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
January 1st, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 8 Comments
Cunning is the dark sanctuary of incapacity.
G. K. Chesterton
| South |
North |
| East-West |
♠ 4 3 2
♥ Q 8 6 3
♦ 10 7 5 2
♣ K 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ 8
♥ J 10 9 5
♦ Q 9 3
♣ J 9 7 6 5 |
♠ Q J 10
♥ 7 4 2
♦ 8 4
♣ Q 10 8 4 2 |
| South |
♠ A K 9 7 6 5
♥ A K
♦ A K J 6
♣ A |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 2♣ |
Pass |
2♦ |
Pass |
| 2♠ |
Pass |
3 NT |
Pass |
| 4 NT |
Pass |
5♣ |
Pass |
| 5♦ |
Pass |
5♥ |
Pass |
| 6♠ |
All pass |
|
|
♥J
When the opponents overcall over a two club opening, you can stretch to make a positive response with fewer values – a six- or seven-count with a decent five-carder would suffice. When you are weak and balanced I suggest you double with 0-4 high-cards, and pass with 5-7. On that basis, this hand would qualify for a pass.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 4 3 2
♥ Q 8 6 3
♦ 10 7 5 2
♣ K 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| Pass |
Pass |
2♣ |
2♦ |
| ? |
|
|
|
|
Today's hand occurred in the quarter-finals of the 1995 Marlboro Venice Cup between USAI and USAII. The match was eventually won comfortably enough by USAI, who lost the finals to Germany.
Both tables finished up in the inferior contract of three no-trumps rather than the excellent five diamonds, and received the lead of a spade round to the king.
It is worth giving a moment’s thought to what declarer’s best line is now. Would you rather play a straightforward percentage line, or go for the psychological line? I suppose a lot depends on the quality of your opponents. The unsuccessful declarer for USAII decided to postpone the decision of which minor to play on till the last minute. She cashed four rounds of hearts, on which West, Carol Simon, threw a (discouraging) diamond 10, and an encouraging club two. After a lot of thought, South decided to believe the defenders, and took the diamond finesse, to go two down.
At the other table the declarer was Rosanne Pollack, who could see that if the hearts did not behave, the simple diamond finesse would not be enough; she decided instead to play for the combination shot of laying down the diamond ace at trick two, then taking the top hearts. Finally she took the club finesse and ended up with 11 tricks. I think USA I earned their swing on this board, don’t you?